Case Study No. 3
Case Study No. 3
Case Study 3
Bangladesh, one of the world’s poorest countries, has long depended heavily upon
exports of textile products to generate income, employment, and economic growth.
Most of these exports are low-cost finished garments sold to mass-market retailers
in the West, such as Walmart. For decades, Bangladesh was able to take advantage
of a quota system for textile exports that gave it, and other poor countries,
preferential access to rich markets such as United states and the European Union.
On January 1, 2005, however, that system was scrapped in favour of one that was
based on free trade principles. From then on, exporters in Bangladesh would have
to compete for business against producers from other nations such as China and
Indonesia. Many analysts predicted the quick collapse of Bangladesh’s textile
industry. They predicted a sharp jump in unemployment, a decline in the country’s
balance of payments accounts, and a negative impact on economic growth.
Bangladesh’s advantage is based on a number of factors. First, labor costs are low,
in part due to low hourly wage rates and in part due to investments by textile
manufacturers in in productivity-boosting technology during the past decade.
Today, wage rates in the textile industry in Bangladesh are about $50 to $60 a
month, less than half the minimum wage in China. While this pay rate seems
dismally low by Western standards, in a country where the gross national income
per capita is only $470 a year, it is a living wage and a source of employment for
some 3 million people, 85 percent of whom are women with few alternative
employment opportunities.
Bangladesh also has the advantage of not being China! Many importers in the West
have grown cautious about becoming too dependent upon China for imports of
specific goods for fear that if there was disruption, economic or other, their supply
chains would be decimated unless they had an alternative source of supply. Thus,
Bangladesh has benefited from the trend by Western importers to diversify their
supply sources. Although China remains the world’s largest exporter of garments,
with exports of $120 billion in 2008, wage rates are rising quite fast, suggesting the
trend to shift textile production away from China may continue. Bangladesh,
however, does have some negatives, most notable are the constant disruptions in
electricity because the government has underinvested in power generation and
distribution infrastructure. Roads and ports are also inferior to those found in China.
Case Questions:
1. Why was the shift to a free trade regime in the textile industry good for
Bangladesh?
Answer:
The shift to a free trade regime in the textile industry was good for
Bangladesh because it allowed the country to become one of the world's lowest-
cost producers of textile products. This shift led to increased exports, higher
incomes, employment, and economic growth in Bangladesh. The free trade regime
created room for competition with other industrial giants, enabling Bangladesh to
sell its products at a relatively low cost and capture the market.
Furthermore, because the government did not interfere with trade,
Bangladesh was able to take use of its comparative advantage in low labor costs to
sell its goods at a low cost and earn substantial profits.
2. Who benefits when retailers in the United States source textiles from low-wage
countries such as Bangladesh? Who might lose? Do the gains outweigh the losses?
Answer:
The consumers benefit as the cost of the products are lower in the United
States. The producers also benefit because they are making money from selling
their textiles to the United States. The people of the low-wage country also benefit
as they are receiving a living wage, respective to their country, and they are able to
find a job that otherwise would not be there. Textile producers in the United States
or other higher-wage countries lose as the manufacturing is being done elsewhere.
The gains outweigh the losses because the consumers and low-wage producers are
better off with the outsourcing the production of textiles. Only the high-wage
producers of textiles will be worse off, which is a lesser impact than that from
outsourcing textile production.
3. What international trade theory, or theories, best explain the rise of Bangladesh
as a textile exporting powerhouse?
Answer:
The international trade theory that best explains the rise of Bangladesh as a
textile exporting powerhouse is the theory of absolute advantage and theory of
comparative advantage.
Submitted by: