Chapter Three
Chapter Three
Theory of Ethics
1
This approach espoused by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, holds
that moral behavior produces the greatest good for the greatest
number.
of each decision alternative on all parties and select the one that
optimizes the satisfaction for the greatest number of people.
3
Utilitarianism is used frequently when business Simple cost-benefits
leaders make critical decisions about things analysis is not a utilitarian
like expansion, store closings, hiring, and calculus unless it includes
layoffs. consideration of all
stakeholders and a full
Utilitarian decision making relies on a systematic
accounting of
comparison of the costs and benefits to all affected
externalities, worker
parties.
preferences, potentially
Using such a cost–benefit analysis, a utilitarian
coercive actions related to
decision maker calculates the utility of the
customers, or community
consequences of all possible alternatives and then
and environmental
selects the one that results in the greatest benefit.
effects. 4
B. The Rights/Individualism View Of Ethics
Given human nature, it is difficult-if not impossible-to eliminate self-
interest.
The rights view of ethics says that ethical decisions are concerned with
respecting and protecting individual liberties and privileges such as
the rights of privacy, freedom of conscience, free speech, life and
safety, and due process.
5
Right views of ethics based on behaviour maintain the Right ethics; the view that
fundamental rights of all human being human rights – not a good
There are six moral rights that should be considered sequences – are
during decision making according to this view. fundamentals.
They are:
legal standards.
7
Three types of justice provide a framework for evaluating the
These are
Distributive justice,
Interactional justice.
8
9
D. Integrative-social Contracts Theory
Integrative social contracts theory proposes that ethical decisions should be
based on empirical (what is) and normative (what should be) factors.
This view is based on the integration of two “contracts” the general social contract
and a more specific contract among members of a specific community that might
be affected by a decision.
social contract whose terms allow for the generation of binding ethical obligations
through the recognition of actual norms created in real social and economic
communities.
10
2. Ethical Egoism & Subjectivism
Ethical Egoism Ethical Subjectivism
Egoism defines right or acceptable behavior Ethical subjectivism argues that no ethical
in terms of its consequences for the theory is objectively true. Statements
individual. They believe that they should
contained in those theories, such as the duty to
make decisions that maximize their own
act in one’s self interest, are only true as
self-interest, which is defined differently by
long as they are believed by the person
each individual.
holding the theory. Therefore, ethics
The egoist ‘s creed generally can be stated as
becomes less a matter of what is objectively
“Do the act that promotes the greatest good
true and more a matter of individual
for oneself”.
perception.
11
Cont’d Cont’d
Ethical subjectivist would argue that those
Many believe that egoistic people and
supposedly objective justifications are really
companies are inherently unethical,
just subjective statements of the person’s
are short-term oriented, and will take
values and desires.
advantage of any opportunity.
If Person A believes it is morally right to keep
For example, if you would benefit
100,000 instead of donating it to charity, then
more from keeping 100,000 than you
for Person A that is the ethical thing to do.
would from donating it to charity
However, if Person B believes donating the
then the morally correct decision
money to others would be ethically correct
would be to keep the money for
then for Person B that is the correct ethical
yourself if you are an ethical egoist.
decision.
12
Cont’d Cont’d
Ethical egoism contends each person has a People have different opinions, but where
duty to act in ways that promote his or her morality is concerned, there are no ʺfactsʺ
self-interest above the interests of all
and no one is ʺrightʺ. People just feel
others. When a moral decision must be
differently, and that’s the end of it. This is
made, the person should exclusively
the basic thought behind Ethical
consider how the results will benefit him or
her. Subjectivism.
However, there is also enlightened egoism. Ethical Subjectivism is the idea that our
Enlightened egoists take a long-range moral opinions are based on our feelings
perspective and allow for the well-being and nothing more. On this view, there is
of others although their own self-interest
no such thing as ʺobjectiveʺ right or
remains paramount.
wrong. 13
Cont’d Cont’d
An example of enlightened Ethical subjectivism contends
egoism is helping a turtle across that objective concepts of good
a highway because, if killed, the and evil or right and wrong do
person would feel distressed. not exist.
To feel good, or eliminate the This leads into other theories
chance of a feeling of distress, such as moral relativism which
the person helps the turtle to suggests these concepts are
cross the road. determined by agreement.
14
3. Principles of Business Ethics
In today ‘s ultra-competitive, high tech, interdependent business world,
but they must be regulated by core ethical principles like the ones described
below.
Ethical principles are universal standards of right and wrong prescribing the
kind of behavior an ethical company or person should and should not engage in.
15
Principles is characterized by its being permanent or remain constant, work
misrepresentations, overstatements,
Integrity refers to a wholeness of
partial truths, selective omissions, or any
character demonstrated by consistency
other means and when trust requires it, they
between thoughts, words and actions.
supply relevant information and correct
misapprehensions of fact.
17
3) Promise-Keeping: 4) Loyalty:
Ethical executives can be trusted because Ethical executives justify trust by being
they make every reasonable effort to fulfill loyal to their organization and the people
the letter and spirit of their promises and they work with.
commitments.
Ethical executives place a high value on
They do not interpret agreements in an protecting and advancing the lawful and
unreasonably technical or legalistic
legitimate interests.
manner.
18
5) Fairness: 6) Caring:
Ethical executives are fundamentally Ethical executives are caring,
committed to fairness. compassionate, benevolent and kind.
19
7. Respect for Others:
8) Law abiding:
Ethical executives demonstrate respect for
the human dignity, autonomy, privacy, Ethical executives abide by laws, rules and
rights, and interests of all those who have a
regulations relating to their business
stake in their decisions; they are courteous
activities.
and treat all people with equal respect and
dignity regardless of sex, race or national
origin.
20
9) Commitment to Excellence 10) Leadership:
Ethical executives pursue excellence in Ethical executives are conscious of the
informed and prepared, and constantly their position of leadership and seek to be
endeavor to increase their proficiency in positive ethical role models by their own
conduct and by creating a good
all areas of responsibility.
environment.
21
11) Reputation and Morale: 12) Accountability:
importance of their own and their personal accountability for the ethical
company’s reputation as well as the quality of their decisions and omissions to
importance of the pride and good morale themselves, their colleagues, their
of employees.
companies, and their communities.
22
“To Educate The Mind Without The Morals Is
Theodore Roosevelt
Thank you