Moot Proposition
Moot Proposition
Moot Proposition
PROPOSITION
1. The Union of Vedanta was famous for its rich traditions and heritage. After years of colonial
rule and a long freedom struggle, it gained independence in 1947. Vedanta's legal history
is rich and diverse, evolving through ancient texts that propounded modes of societal
governance. The Mauryavan and Lakshayana empires of Vedanta had well-defined legal
systems. After a prolonged colonial experience, Vedanta's independence in 1947 led to
significant legal reforms, including the adoption of the Constitution in 1950. Today,
Vedanta boasts a complex legal landscape blending ancient traditions with modern statutes,
fostering a dynamic and evolving legal system. Contemporary Vedanta is a vibrant
democratic nation marked by cultural diversity, technological advancements, and economic
growth. With a population exceeding a billion, it navigates the challenges of development,
urbanization, and social equality.
3. Enacted in 2000, the Vedanta Information Technology Act (“VITA”) was a response to the
evolving landscape of technology, digitization, and the burgeoning use of electronic
transactions. Its primary aim was to provide legal recognition to electronic documents and
facilitate e-commerce while addressing the challenges posed by cybercrimes. VITA
establishes a framework for the governance of cyberspace, outlining regulations and
penalties for offenses related to unauthorized access, hacking, data breaches, and
cyberterrorism.
4. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and clauses (z) and (zg) of sub-
section (2) of section 87 of the VITA, the Government of Vedanta enacted the VITA
(Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 (“VITA Rules”).
The need for the VITA Rules, as stated in the governmental memorandum of reasons, arose
due to the surge in digital communication, increased social media usage, and concerns
regarding the spread of misinformation, fake news, and online abuse. These rules aim to
create a regulatory framework for digital platforms, making them more accountable for the
content hosted on their platforms.
5. The Union Government, on April 6, 2023, issued amendments to the VITA Rules, 2021,
known as the ‘VITA Amendment Rules, 2023’. These amendments primarily govern online
gaming, and the verification of information deemed “false,” “fake,” or “misleading”
concerning the Union Government, among many other things. The current VITA Rules are
divided into three parts: Part I outlines preliminary definitions and groundwork; Part II
details the due diligence to be undertaken by intermediaries and provisions for a grievance
[Type here]
redressal mechanism; and Part III outlines the code of ethics and procedures and safeguards
concerning digital media.
6. Launched in 2008, ‘WeTube’ is a new and popular phenomenon in Vedanta, where users
can create channels and upload videos for the public to view. Many individuals from
various personal and professional backgrounds have started uploading videos on WeTube,
including journalists, filmmakers, music series channels, comedians, and vloggers.
WeTube boasts a user base of 17.5 million users within Vedanta itself.
7. Mehul, a Vedantan stand-up comedian, is renowned for his observational humor that
highlights the absurdities of life. His comedic routines encompass subjects like politics,
taxi rides, bachelorhood, and television commercials, which he routinely posted on his
WeTube account. Very soon, his followers and views surged, and it became a widely
followed channel. He gained notoriety when a video clip from one of his shows, posted on
WeTube in 2015, resulted in death threats due to his satirical commentary on Vedantan
hyper-nationalism. Consequently, he has become a contentious figure in public media and
discussions. Over time, he began shifting the focus of his videos on WeTube from issues
of routine living to political commentary and humorous satires.
8. Since 2018, Mehul has been a passionate critic of the ruling Vedanta Praja Party (“VPP”).
Vedanta has been ruled by the VPP since 2005. The government, led by Prime Minister
Narsingh, won 303 seats out of the 545 contested in the last elections. The opposition, in
the minority, is led by the Vedanta Democratic Party (“VDP”), which has remained vocal
and watchful of the government since it came to power. The government is often criticized
by the opposition for issues related to economic policies, socio-religious diversity, and
alleged erosion of democratic institutions. Sharing a similar sentiment and disapproval of
the Supreme Court of Vedanta, Mehul posted a monologue on his WeTube channel, which
has 2.5 million followers, on November 22, 2023, where he made the following remarks:
“Once a roadblock to national development, this Supreme Court has been full of bigotry! It is
completely flooded with majoritarian bias, political influence, and controversial decisions. No
wonder they came up with Temple and Citizenship approvals. It is good for nothing but eroding
institutional autonomy, curtailing dissent, and showing zero responsiveness to government
initiatives. The Supreme Court is the biggest joke of the nation. Let’s call it the Supreme Joke of
Vedanta.”
9. On October 7, 2023, an armed conflict erupted between two nations, Fixreal and Galentine,
both situated on the western fringe of the same continent that Vedanta is part of. On that
day, a group referred to as 'Tumbles,' designated a terrorist organization by Fixreal, initiated
a multi-pronged invasion of southern Fixreal from the neighboring region known as the
'Trapezia Strip.' The attack reportedly involved a barrage of rockets, with approximately
3,000 militants breaching the Trapezia–Fixreal barrier and targeting Fixreali military bases,
civilian population centers, and even a nearby music festival. However, some nations
attributed responsibility to Fixreal, criticizing it for historically occupying Galentinian
lands, thereby justifying the attack. In response, Fixreal declared a state of war, marking
the commencement of military escalation in the region, the first since 1973. By the end of
November 2023, thousands of Galentinians had lost their lives, and the widespread civilian
casualties led to accusations of war crimes against both Fixreal and Galentine/Tumbles.
10. In the Combined Nations General Assembly (“CNGA”), Vedanta abstained from voting
for a ceasefire in the Fixreal-Galentine conflict, protesting the omission of any “explicit
[Type here]
condemnation” of the heinous October 7 terror attack by Tumbles militants on Fixreal.
However, through indirect channels, Vedanta has also sent supplies to the affected people
of Galentine. Vedanta’s stance on the international issue has been complex and is said to
stem from a strategic necessity of preserving relations with multiple global powers, an
aversion to terrorism due to its domestic experiences, and long-term diplomatic interests.
Others have interpreted this as apathy toward humanitarian concerns.
11. On 25th November, investigative journalist Yumna Haider, whose account has around 4.3
million followers, also posted a video on WeTube condemning the supporters of Fixreal.
She stated that the failure to differentiate between Tumbles and Galentinians is akin to
forgetting the miseries of innocent civilians. Sharing her perspective on the situation, she
posted a video on WeTube, stating:
12. “Vedanta’s abstention from voting on Fixreal comes in the face of the suffering of innocent
people. This omission has officially made us murderers by endorsing violence and war
crimes. Vedanta should hang its head in shame today. This Prime Minister also has blood
on his hands, and we should not forget that, even when foreign policy says otherwise, we
stand united against Fixreal's war crimes. We dismiss any claims of terrorists invading
Fixreal as mere propaganda to justify an intended war on Galentine.”
13. In a curious turn of events, on the morning of 26th November 2023, Mehul found his
WeTube account partially restricted. He was unable to post any videos. His account showed
that these actions were taken in accordance with WeTube’s community guidelines, terms
of use, and its legal obligations under the laws of Vedanta. However, he was still allowed
to comment on videos, react with emoticons, and post 24-hour short stories on his account.
These restrictions were lifted one month later. By the end of December 2023, seven
individuals accused Mehul of contempt of court and sued him over his video. The Attorney
General of Vedanta granted mandatory approval to initiate contempt proceedings,
following which the video was removed by WeTube, and his account was suspended
indefinitely.
14. Yumna’s video was also flagged with a ‘sensitive content warning’ on the morning of 27th
November 2023. By the end of November, large groups on social media criticized Yumna
for her remarks on the Fixreal-Galentine issue, accusing her of being dogmatic and
insensitive to the experiences of terrorism felt worldwide. Numerous channels published
videos claiming that her statements could undermine Vedanta's long-standing neutral
stance, which was crucial for preserving its friendly relations with other nations. As a result,
she was also restricted from posting videos of the maximum allowed length. Her video time
limit was reduced to 10 minutes per video, and she was no longer allowed to post short
stories due to the nature of her page, which had a large following based on her journalistic
reputation. She could only like content posted by others but was prohibited from
commenting on it.
15. The Supreme Court of Vedanta initiated contempt proceedings against Mehul on 1st
December 2023. In response, both Mehul and Yumna filed writ petitions in the High Courts
of Vedanta within their respective territorial jurisdictions, challenging the constitutionality
of the VITA Rules, 2021. Their petitions argued that the VITA Rules failed to adequately
regulate platforms like WeTube and left citizens’ freedoms at the discretion of private
entities. They viewed the restrictions placed on their accounts as violations of their
fundamental rights guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution. They opposed the VITA
Rules on the grounds that the regulations promoted self-censorship by imposing
[Type here]
unnecessary burdens on private companies and lacked sufficient safeguards to foster a
culture where dissent is protected, not suppressed.
16. While these petitions were pending in the High Courts, the Supreme Court exercised its
power to transfer the case from the High Courts to itself at the request of the Attorney
General. The Supreme Court was convinced that the legal questions raised in these petitions
were substantially similar to those in a case already pending before the Supreme Court.
Given the broad reach of the social media platform involved and its public function, the
Supreme Court admitted the writ and issued notices to the Union of Vedanta and WeTube
to appear for the matter. It restricted its adjudication to the following two issues, scheduling
the case to be heard in 2024:
I. Whether the VITA Rules, 2021, and VITA Amendment Rules, 2023, violate
fundamental rights under Part III of the Constitution of Vedanta?
II. Whether the restrictions enforced by WeTube under the VITA Rules, 2021, violate
the fundamental rights of the petitioners?
Note:
• The laws of Vedanta are pari materia with the laws of India.
• All references are fictional. The legal system, history, and political circumstances of India
apply mutatis mutandis to Vedanta. For the sake of argument, please assume WeTube is
equivalent to YouTube, CNGA to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), VITA
Rules to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics
Code) Rules, 2021, and VITA to the Information Technology Act, 2000 of India.
• Counsel may articulate and present submissions on any number of sub-issues under the
aforesaid two issues, but cannot add, or amend the given issues.
[Type here]