https://www.eejournals.

org Open Access

EURASIAN EXPERIMENT JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH

(EEJPH)
ISSN: 2992-4081 ©EEJPH Publications
Volume 5 Issue 3 2024

Page | 1

The Role of Public Health in Reducing Tobacco Use

Nambi Namusisi H.

School of Natural and Applied Sciences Kampala International University Uganda

ABSTRACT
Despite reducing global prevalence, tobacco smoking continues to be a major public health concern.
Public health plays an important role in lowering tobacco consumption through evidence-based initiatives
such as education, cessation programs, and legislative interventions. This article investigates the
comprehensive strategy that public health agencies take, which includes prevention, community-based
programs, and worldwide collaboration. The significance of law in establishing tobacco control strategies
is discussed, with a focus on excise taxes, smoking prohibitions, and advertising limitations. While public
health efforts have yielded remarkable results, continuing innovation and global collaboration are critical
to combating tobacco addiction and minimizing its negative health consequences.
Keywords: Public health, tobacco control, smoking cessation, legislation, tobacco use prevention.
INTRODUCTION
For over a century, tobacco use has represented a major public health problem. Due to the pronounced
negative population health effects associated with tobacco use, including respiratory complications,
cancer, and cardiovascular disease, a significant amount of attention is dedicated to studying the
consequences of exposure to tobacco. Pragmatically, the global tobacco use prevalence is declining yet
still represents a considerable health care burden. Moreover, despite international efforts to halt global
tobacco use, this substance is responsible for killing about one-half of its users. With a resultant economic
burden on the health care system of $1.4 trillion annually, the severity of tobacco use as a public health
issue cannot be understated [1, 2]. Public health has traditionally been tasked with reducing the
prevalence of tobacco use in the population. This is not a new idea, with senior U.S. government officials
in 1925 stating that in preventing tobacco use, "it is our duty, as well as the part of wise statesmanship, to
make the masses of the people realize the health and national efficiency consequences of immorality
practiced…to wage a great educational battle in favor of personal right living." Despite significant
developments in this area, both in response to smokers and the substance, there is no one-size-fits-all
approach. This paper aims to set the stage for the following substantive papers in this issue, which outline
several key approaches to the public health endeavor [3, 4].
Public Health Strategies for Tobacco Control
Public health uses a strategic framework to address the issue of tobacco use comprehensively, focusing on
prevention as well as cessation. Prevention interventions encompass a wide variety of strategies,
including school prevention programs, youth access reduction, restricting advertising, and promoting
smoke-free environments. Comprehensive cessation programs have systematically increased the
availability of counseling and pharmacological interventions for adults and shown long-term reductions
in smoking rates of between 11 and 18 percent. Tobacco control is driven in large part by the availability
of data about smoking behaviors and correlates; surveillance data and analysis are readily available to
public health practitioners [5, 6]. Since the 1980s, dozens of studies have shown that tobacco control
strategies are effective at reducing smoking rates. Direct and mass population education is extremely
useful to inform individuals and communities about the risks of tobacco use and the benefits of not
smoking. Mass media, community outreach, print materials, and local and state health department
programming provide valuable information about risk factors and disease prevention to millions of people
who want to quit tobacco use. On a community level, health education builds awareness about tobacco use
and provides information that changes knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes related to tobacco use and
secondhand smoke exposure. It also helps communities take action to prevent and manage tobacco-
https://www.eejournals.org Open Access
related diseases. Importantly, health education reinforces positive behaviors associated with quitting and
maintaining a tobacco-free lifestyle [7, 8]. The collection, dissemination, and utilization of surveillance
data on which populations are smoking and dying from tobacco-related diseases is the foundation of our
understanding, addition, and strategy within the public health approach to tobacco control. The public
health approach fosters coordination and collaboration within the public health, healthcare, and public
policy communities to develop targeted interventions that are effective, sustainable, and promote healthy
environments for all. Moreover, interventions and education strategies are tailored to the unique
Page | 2
demographics and characteristics of military and veteran populations. State, county, and city
governments work collaboratively with the private sector, healthcare stakeholders, educators, and
constituents to move Team Up and Health to practice the 3Ps of a public health approach: preventing
initiation, promoting quitting among adults and youth, and protecting all community members from the
health effects of secondhand smoke in an effort to create mass behavior change that will influence future
generations not to use tobacco. These strategic programming approaches and evidence-based strategies
have had a demonstrable impact and results [9, 10]. Public health successes demonstrate the need and
effectiveness of the prevention side of the public health approach to tobacco control. However, new
additional approaches are needed to address the depth of and stronghold held by tobacco addiction. Public
health and the nation must constantly innovate to find new and effective ways to address this serious
health issue [11, 12].
Legislation And Policy Interventions
Some of the most effective interventions in reducing tobacco use involve legislation and policy. This text
is not intended to be an exhaustive review of all relevant laws, regulations, and policies concerning
tobacco control. But some are so significant and far-reaching that they are mentioned here. At the local
level, there are complete or partial smoking bans in city parks, beaches, and outdoor dining areas. At the
national and international level, there are talks and treaties governing trade agreements, tobacco
advertising, cigarette marketing, and graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging. One of the
strongest interventions is the use of excise taxes on cigarettes and then spending the money to prevent
more smoking or to treat smoking-related diseases. Scientific understanding of the relationship between
specific policies and reductions in the consumption of tobacco products is still evolving [12, 11]. Public
policy generally, and health policy specifically, are important determinants of population health. Reducing
tobacco use to a marginal, if not altogether obsolete, behavior is of value to public health. An important
goal of public policy in a free society is to create the conditions that make it easy for people to live healthy
lives. Policies are put into place based on the principles of public health and justice. The intention is to
promote public health among all citizens, particularly those who suffer disparities in cancer incidence and
death. It is much easier to prevent a health risk for everyone than to try and treat only those who can
avail themselves of clinical care. Even non-smokers would find public health benefits from different
policies and laws. Given the geographic range of local tobacco control advocacy, different rules imposed
across village, town, city, and country lines would be confusing and unnecessarily complicated. However,
a barrier to this law is the enforcement and compliance of cost and ready availability of smoking cessation
and treatment services. Enforcement and compliance with a law raise the financial question of equal
availability to all people and races, and this is a problem for someone poor. Public health advocacy and
public health lawyers have spent decades creating, implementing, and defending this law. National efforts
continue to support this ongoing advocacy. Legislative support eases the path of laws that help promote
public health in the long run. Generally speaking, then, passing a law that requires tobacco control is an
easier and financially expedient way of making the desired changes in the tobacco landscape [13, 14].
Community-Based Programs and Education Campaigns
To effect change at the community level, public health agencies engage in efforts to support community
organizational activities. Grassroots participation in tobacco control activities leads to sustainable efforts
and broad community engagement. A targeted approach in tobacco control must be culturally sensitive,
age and gender-specific, population and issues or types of use specific, and consist of appropriate
community intervention and assessment tools. Community education must include emotional appeals,
education and information, and cessation and disease prevention [15, 16]. Educational campaigns aimed
at raising knowledge levels are an important part of any community program. Such campaigns are
effective in several areas including general awareness of the subject matter, beliefs, and intentions, and
there has been some initial success with actual behavior change. For example, educational campaigns and
other community programs that include group strategies, social support, public policy, and the like lead to
an increase in intention to quit, an increase in perceived community norm about smoking, and an increase
in success rates of those who do attempt to quit [17, 3].
https://www.eejournals.org Open Access
The Smoke-Free Community Grant Program successfully employed strategies in prevention, cessation,
and changing public opinion through public education. Key components of this program have been in
changing the quality-of-life surrounding tobacco use and in using signage for both public awareness and
as a constant reminder of the Clean Indoor Air Act. Results from a community intervention program
whose primary goal is to help communities develop capacity to address tobacco industry advertising and
promotions as well as cessation and education programs have shown effectiveness. In California, the use
of a broad-based media campaign was credited by many for the decline in smoking rates. Finally, several
Page | 3
states are using the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation methodology to involve whole
communities in comprehensive tobacco control programs [18, 19]. Public health has provided a sound
infrastructure for tobacco control. The community level of those programs must be complemented and
supported. Community-level tobacco control advocates must make an effective case demonstrating the
promise of success at that level of prevention. Data is accumulating which supports the cost-effectiveness
of state program interventions. Follow-up evaluation data is necessary to show the impact of state
program expenditures on tobacco consumption levels. Research on best practices to reduce the incidence
of tobacco consumption in the community is critical to communicate the promise at the retail level of the
four P's of tobacco control. There is a compelling case to be made that national interests are well served
by sustained funding of community tobacco control activities [20, 21].
Global Efforts and Collaborations
Efforts to reduce tobacco use have expanded globally, spawning numerous frameworks and initiatives.
The development of a comprehensive model of guiding principles for reduced tobacco use has been
coordinated by various organizations and governments. Moreover, professional organizations, as well as
associations, have fostered collaborations, using shared resources, knowledge, and best practices to raise
the profile of smoking cessation and tobacco control [22, 23]. There is substantial evidence that
collaborations can be effective. Several countries are leaders in this work. Public health professionals
conducted comprehensive surveillance of individuals' tobacco use and behaviors. In addition to protecting
their populations, leaders in tobacco use prevention also contributed to the development of tobacco
taxation models. Furthermore, organizations can provide valuable technical assistance in simplifying
policy guidance, especially for clinical efforts. However, implementing a broad global approach to
addressing the tobacco epidemic could be more complex in a low-resource setting, where resources are
already highly concentrated in other areas, such as the fight against infectious diseases, maternal and
child health, physical infrastructures, and education. To date, there has been no binding international
treaty on tobacco smoking reduction measures. As a result, during the last decade, there has been
increasing collaboration and consensus among countries on tobacco control regulations through
international and regional declarations [24, 25]. Ironically, some countries that have developed their
smoke control laws have pushed tobacco exports, lobbied against international smoke control treaties,
and funded extensive advertising abroad to popularize their tobacco products. Therefore, current
achievements and effective cooperation must continue, and public health must be regarded as a global
issue rather than one distinct to public health or global health alone. To tackle the worldwide rise in
chronic and lifestyle-related illnesses, the treatment of tobacco-related diseases deserves emphasis and
needs to foster novel global collaborations [26, 27].
CONCLUSION
Public health efforts have made substantial progress in reducing tobacco use globally, demonstrating the
effectiveness of prevention programs, community outreach, and legislative measures. However, the
persistence of tobacco addiction and its widespread health consequences demand continuous innovation
and robust global collaboration. Coordinated efforts from governments, healthcare sectors, and
communities remain essential in sustaining progress, protecting vulnerable populations, and ensuring a
tobacco-free future.
REFERENCES
1. O'Leary R, Polosa R. Tobacco harm reduction in the 21st century. Drugs and Alcohol Today.
2020 Sep 10;20(3):219-34.
2. Padhiary S, Samal D, Khandayataray P, Murthy MK. A systematic review report on tobacco
products and its health issues in India. Reviews on environmental health. 2021 Sep 27;36(3):367-
89. [HTML]
3. Rigotti NA, Kruse GR, Livingstone-Banks J, Hartmann-Boyce J. Treatment of tobacco smoking:
a review. Jama. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):566-77. ucdavis.edu
4. Glynn TJ, Hays JT, Kemper K. E-cigarettes, harm reduction, and tobacco control: a path
forward?. InMayo Clinic Proceedings 2021 Apr 1 (Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 856-862). Elsevier.
mayoclinicproceedings.org
https://www.eejournals.org Open Access
5. Gøtzsche PC, Demasi M. Interventions to help patients withdraw from depression drugs: A
systematic review. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine. 2024 Jan 1;35(2):103-16.
medrxiv.org
6. Berg CJ, Krishnan N, Graham AL, Abroms LC. A synthesis of the literature to inform vaping
cessation interventions for young adults. Addictive behaviors. 2021 Aug 1;119:106898.
7. Glasser AM, Roberts ME. Retailer density reduction approaches to tobacco control: a review.
Health & place. 2021 Jan 1;67:102342.
Page | 4
8. Egbe CO, Magati P, Wanyonyi E, Sessou L, Owusu-Dabo E, Ayo-Yusuf OA. Landscape of
tobacco control in sub-Saharan Africa. Tobacco Control. 2022 Mar 1;31(2):153-9. bmj.com
9. St Claire S, Gouda H, Schotte K, Fayokun R, Fu D, Varghese C, Prasad VM. Lung health,
tobacco, and related products: gaps, challenges, new threats, and suggested research. American
Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 2020 May 1;318(5):L1004-7.
physiology.org
10. Mackay JM, Dorotheo EU, Assunta M, Ritthiphakdee B. Tobacco control in Asia-Pacific: wins,
challenges and targets. Tobacco Control. 2022 Mar 1;31(2):146-9. bmj.com
11. McKinlay JB, Marceau LD. Upstream healthy public policy: lessons from the battle of tobacco.
Political And Economic Determinants of Population Health and Well-Being:. 2020 Nov 25:201-
20. psu.edu
12. Flor LS, Reitsma MB, Gupta V, Ng M, Gakidou E. The effects of tobacco control policies on
global smoking prevalence. Nature Medicine. 2021 Feb;27(2):239-43.
13. Fleischer NL, Donahoe JT, McLeod MC, Thrasher JF, Levy DT, Elliott MR, Meza R, Patrick
ME. Taxation reduces smoking but may not reduce smoking disparities in youth. Tobacco
control. 2021 May 1;30(3):264-72. nih.gov
14. Kaplan BA, Koffarnus MN, Franck CT, Bickel WK. Effects of reduced-nicotine cigarettes across
regulatory environments in the experimental tobacco marketplace: a randomized trial. Nicotine
and Tobacco Research. 2021 Jul 1;23(7):1123-32. nih.gov
15. Speer PW, Gupta J, Haapanen K, Balmer B, Wiley KT, Bachelder A. Developing community
power for health equity: a landscape analysis of current research and theory. Nashville:
Vanderbilt University, September. 2020 Sep.
16. World Health Organization. Guidance on engagement of communities and civil society to end
tuberculosis. World Health Organization; 2023 Oct 11.
17. Vallata A, O'Loughlin J, Cengelli S, Alla F. Predictors of cigarette smoking cessation in
adolescents: a systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2021 Apr 1;68(4):649-57.
18. Kegler MC, Dekanosidze A, Torosyan A, Grigoryan L, Rana S, Hayrumyan V, Sargsyan Z, Berg
CJ. Community coalitions for smoke-free environments in Armenia and Georgia: a mixed
methods analysis of coalition formation, implementation and perceived effectiveness. PloS one.
2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289149. plos.org
19. Hellesen S, Bankston-Lee K, Maytum C, Tong EK. Strategies and lessons learned for smoke and
Tobacco-Free policy change on community colleges with community-based support. Journal of
American College Health. 2022 Nov 17;70(8):2406-15. [HTML]
20. Singh A, Owusu-Dabo E, Mdege N, McNeill A, Britton J, Bauld L. A situational analysis of
tobacco control in Ghana: progress, opportunities and challenges. Journal of global health
reports. 2020;4.
21. Barnett R, Jiang S, Peng S. Evaluating China’s record of tobacco control. InSmoking
Environments in China: Challenges for Tobacco Control 2021 Dec 10 (pp. 247-285). Cham:
Springer International Publishing. [HTML]
22. Sóñora G, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Barnoya J, Llorente B, Szklo AS, Thrasher JF.
Achievements, challenges, priorities and needs to address the current tobacco epidemic in Latin
America. Tobacco control. 2022 Mar 1;31(2):138-41. bmj.com
23. Willett J, Achenbach S, Pinto FJ, Poppas A, Elkind MS. The tobacco endgame: eradicating a
worsening epidemic a joint opinion from the American Heart Association, World Heart
Federation, American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Journal of
the American College of Cardiology. 2021 Jul 6;78(1):77-81. jacc.org
24. Underwood JM. Overview and methods for the youth risk behavior surveillance system—United
States, 2019. MMWR supplements. 2020;69.
25. Donaldson SI, Dormanesh A, Perez C, Majmundar A, Allem JP. Association between exposure to
tobacco content on social media and tobacco use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA
pediatrics. 2022 Sep 1;176(9):878-85. jamanetwork.com
https://www.eejournals.org Open Access
26. Borges LC, Menezes HZ, Souza IM. Dilemmas in the implementation of the world Health
organization framework convention on tobacco control. Cadernos de saude publica. 2020 Feb
21;36:e00136919.
27. Milsom P, Smith R, Baker P, Walls H. Corporate power and the international trade regime
preventing progressive policy action on non-communicable diseases: a realist review. Health
policy and planning. 2021 May 1;36(4):493-508. oup.com
Page | 5
CITE AS: Nambi Namusisi H. (2024). The Role of Public Health in
Reducing Tobacco Use. EURASIAN EXPERIMENT JOURNAL OF
PUBLIC HEALTH, 5(3):1-5