Ch10 Tree Index
Ch10 Tree Index
Chapter 9
Introduction
As for any index, 3 alternatives for data entries k*:
Data record with key value k <k, rid of data record with search key value k> <k, list of rids of data records with search key k>
Choice is orthogonal to the indexing technique used to locate data entries k*. Tree-structured indexing techniques support both range searches and equality searches. ISAM: static structure; B+ tree: dynamic, adjusts gracefully under inserts and deletes.
2
Range Searches
``Find all students with gpa > 3.0
If data is in sorted file, do binary search to find first such student, then scan to find others. Cost of binary search can be quite high.
Index File
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page N
Data File
ISAM
P 0
index entry
K P K 2 Pm
Index file may still be quite large. But we can apply the idea repeatedly!
Non-leaf Pages
Comments on ISAM
Data Pages
File creation: Leaf (data) pages allocated sequentially, sorted by search key; then index pages allocated, then space for overflow pages. Overflow pages Index entries: <search key value, page id>; they `direct search for data entries, which are in leaf pages. Search: Start at root; use key comparisons to go to leaf. Cost log F N ; F = # entries/index pg, N = # leaf pgs Insert: Find leaf data entry belongs to, and put it there. Delete: Find and remove from leaf; if empty overflow page, de-allocate.
Index Pages
Root
40
20
33
51
63
10*
15*
20*
27*
33*
37*
40*
46*
51*
55*
63*
97*
20
33
51
63
Overflow Pages
23*
48*
41*
42*
20
33
51
63
10*
15*
20*
27*
33*
37*
40*
46*
55*
63*
23*
48*
41*
Data Entries ("Sequence set") Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke 9
Example B+ Tree
Search begins at root, and key comparisons direct it to a leaf (as in ISAM). Search for 5*, 15*, all data entries >= 24* ...
Root
13 17 24 30
2*
3*
5*
7*
14* 16*
B+ Trees in Practice
Typical order: 100. Typical fill-factor: 67%. Typical capacities:
average fanout = 133 Height 4: 1334 = 312,900,700 records Height 3: 1333 = 2,352,637 records Level 1 = 1 page = 8 Kbytes Level 2 = 133 pages = 1 Mbyte Level 3 = 17,689 pages = 133 MBytes
11
Redistribute entries evenly, copy up middle key. Insert index entry pointing to L2 into parent of L.
Entry to be inserted in parent node. (Note that 5 is copied up and s continues to appear in the leaf.)
2*
3*
5*
7*
8*
17
Entry to be inserted in parent node. (Note that 17 is pushed up and only appears once in the index. Contrast this with a leaf split.)
13
24
30
13
13
24
30
2*
3*
5*
7* 8*
14* 16*
v Notice that root was split, leading to increase in height. v In this example, we can avoid split by re-distributing entries; however, this is usually not done in practice.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke 14
If merge occurred, must delete entry (pointing to L or sibling) from parent of L. Merge could propagate to root, decreasing height.
15
Example Tree After (Inserting 8*, Then) Deleting 19* and 20* ...
Root
17
13
27
30
2*
3*
5*
7* 8*
14* 16*
22* 24*
27* 29*
Deleting 19* is easy. Deleting 20* is done with re-distribution. Notice how middle key is copied up.
16
30
22*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39*
Root
5 13 17 30
2*
3*
5*
7*
8*
14* 16*
17
Root
22
13
17
20
30
2* 3*
5* 7* 8*
14* 16*
17* 18*
20* 21*
18
After Re-distribution
Intuitively, entries are re-distributed by `pushing through the splitting entry in the parent node. It suffices to re-distribute index entry with key 20; weve re-distributed 17 as well for illustration.
Root
17
13
20
22
30
2* 3*
5* 7* 8*
14* 16*
17* 18*
20* 21*
19
Is this correct? Not quite! What if there is a data entry Davey Jones? (Can only compress David Smith to Davi) In general, while compressing, must leave each index entry greater than every key value (in any subtree) to its left.
3* 4*
6* 9*
10* 11*
12* 13*
21
Index entries for leaf pages always entered into rightmost index page just 3* above leaf level. When this fills up, it splits. (Split may go up right-most path to the root.) Much faster than repeated inserts, especially when one considers locking!
12
23
35
4*
6* 9*
10* 11* 12* 13* 20*22* 23* 31* 35* 36* 38* 41* 44*
Root
20
10
35
12
23
3* 4*
6* 9*
10* 11* 12* 13* 20*22* 23* 31* 35* 36* 38* 41* 44*
22
Slow. Does not give sequential storage of leaves. Has advantages for concurrency control. Fewer I/Os during build. Leaves will be stored sequentially (and linked, of course). Can control fill factor on pages.
23
A Note on `Order
Order (d) concept replaced by physical space criterion in practice (`at least half-full).
Index pages can typically hold many more entries than leaf pages. Variable sized records and search keys mean differnt nodes will contain different numbers of entries. Even with fixed length fields, multiple records with the same search key value (duplicates) can lead to variable-sized data entries (if we use Alternative (3)).
24
Summary
Tree-structured indexes are ideal for rangesearches, also good for equality searches. ISAM is a static structure.
Only leaf pages modified; overflow pages needed. Overflow chains can degrade performance unless size of data set and data distribution stay constant. Inserts/deletes leave tree height-balanced; log F N cost. High fanout (F) means depth rarely more than 3 or 4. Almost always better than maintaining a sorted file.
25
Summary (Contd.)
Typically, 67% occupancy on average. Usually preferable to ISAM, modulo locking considerations; adjusts to growth gracefully. If data entries are data records, splits can change rids!
Key compression increases fanout, reduces height. Bulk loading can be much faster than repeated inserts for creating a B+ tree on a large data set. Most widely used index in database management systems because of its versatility. One of the most optimized components of a DBMS.
26