The line graph gives information about the percentage of population using the internet in the USA,

Mexico and Canada from 1999 to 2009. Overall, the percentage of internet users in all countries
increased, albeit varying degree. It is also clear that the gap between countries widened, with
Canada taking dominance over the USA.

Focusing on from 1999 to 2005, the USA and Canada showed rising trends, with former starting the
period at 20% before increasing dramatically to 70 % in 2005. The latter experienced a sharp rise,
growing from 10% in 1999 to 70% in 2005. The percentage of Mexico saw a slight rise from almost 9
% at the beginning to 30% in half decade.

By 2009, the rate of internet user in Canada increased moderately from 70% in 2005 to 100% in
2009, taking the dominance over the USA. Regarding the USA, it showed a slight increase from 70%
to 80% at the end of the period. In the case of Mexico, it continued increasing from 30 % to 40% at
the last year.
The table compares consumers in terms of their spending on three categories in five countries in
2002, namely Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey. Overall, consumers in all countries spent the
highest proportion of their money on Food/Drinks/ tobacco as well as clothing and footwear, while
leisure and education was least attracted. It is also clear that turkey was dominant in first and third
categories; however, the Italy was in second category.

In detail, consumers in all countries spent most of their money on Food and drink, with Turkey
spending 32.14 %, followed by Ireland at 28.91%. The proportion of spending in the rest of countries
was approximately 15%.

Regarding to Clothing/footwear, the expenditure was lower. Only Italy (9%) spent higher than that of
other countries (6%) in question. Focusing on Leisure and Education, Turkey spent little money,
accounting 4.35%. The Ireland (2.21%) used money little as same as that of rest countries.
The table compares teachers’ earnings per year in five countries, namely, Australia, Korea,
Luxemburg, Denmark and Japan, along with the time it takes them to reach the maximum salary in
2009. Overall, Luxembourg stood out as the highest paying country, teachers in remaining countries
earned far less. It is also clear that it takes much time in Korea, Luxembourg and Japan to get
maximum salary.

Looking first at Asian countries, teachers in Korea earned an annual salary of 30,500 $ at their
starting careers, which was considerably more than that of Japanese (28,000$). After 15 year, the
salary in both countries increased to 52,600 $ and 49000 $ respectively. Turning to maximum salary,
teachers in Korea would obtain 84.500 $ in 37 years as opposed to Japanese teacher who obtain
62,400$ in 34 years of experience.

When it comes to European countries, teachers in Denmark and Luxembourg started their career
with 47,000 $ an 80,000 $ respectively. After 15 years of experience, teachers in former country
would generate 54,000$, while teachers in latter country would earn 112,000$. Teachers in
Luxembourg would work 30 years to get 139.000$as opposed to Danish teacher who would obtain
maximum salary (54000$) after working 8 years.

In Australia, teachers started their career with 34,600 $. Having worked 15 years, they would
generate 48,000 $ which is their maximum salary. They would work 9 years to earn maximum salary.
The bar graph compares the changes in the yearly rice production in four countries
in 2005, 2010, and 2015, measured in million tons. Overall, there was a general rise
in all countries in question, with the exception of country C. It is also clear that
country A and B produced higher amounts of rice in all years.

In detail, country A manufactured 45 mt in 2005, then this number increased

gradually to 50 mt until 2015. Regarding country B, the amount of rice was
approximately 26 mt at the beginning. This relative number experienced a dramatic
rise to around 43 mt before declining to 36 mt in 2015.

Focusing on country C and D, the quantities of countries were 5 mt and about 3 mt in

2005. The amount of rice in country C saw a growth by 2 mt in 2010 before falling to
5 mt in 2015. The amount of rice in country D stayed unchanged, and then this figure
increased to 5 mt in 2015.
In recent times, issues associated with the environment are becoming more
dangerous. I believe overpopulation and urbanization are the main causes, global
cooperation and regulation can solve these problems.

One major cause is overpopulation and this is creating problems. When there is no
enough space for accommodation, people start to seek suitable place for living in
farmlands, leading to elimination in the number of trees. Amazon, for instance, have
been cutting because of overpopulation in Brazil.

Beyond overpopulation, the increase in the number of factories results in

environmental issues. Many plants produce harmful gases, resulting in the rise of
carbon footprint. When there is large amount of carbon emission, it causes to global
warming. Tashkent, for instance, has been the most polluted city around the world
two times in statistics.

There is one solution to overcome these problems. When countries discuss together
on problems, they can find the way we solve the issues. In other words, there occurs
many ideas to put to use to tackle problems that affecting to people’s life. BMT, for
instance, that contains many countries, which can give their solutions to the
problems harming the environment, finding the many alternative solutions.

Apart from cooperative work, the policy and regulation can be another way of
tackling the challenge. Regulation can force people to do not harm the environment,
reducing the harm of people or factories. When there is law to protect the
environment, people would not throw rubbish outside. For instance, Hong Kong has
strict rule against making environment dirty. If people throw trash, they would be
paying 150$ in this city.

In conclusion, the one of main cause is population explosion, which is leading to

deforestation, with modernization releasing toxic gases. By creating rule and global
cooperation can tackle these challenges.
Many places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately,
tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not well managed.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world?

Numerous places in the part of the world consider tourism as majority of their
income. Unluckily, many problems can be created by tourism if it is not managed
well. I believe advantages -- economic benefits and cultural exchange -- of tourism
outweigh disadvantages.

One drawback has to do with environment associated with carbon footprint. As the sheer of
people want to travel countryside by using several type of vehicles, it may lead to increase in
carbon emission rate. In Italy and Vince, for instance, a daily influx of tourism on the road is
causing to traffic congestion, with the quality of life becoming worse for local residents.

Another disadvantage is connected with the cost. If there is a high demand for products,
seller may increase the cost of their products, which leads to high costs. Raised cost may
create many issues for local residents. In some cities of Uzbekistan, for instance, sellers
increased cost of food and accommodation, leading to inflation.

Despite negatives, one major advantage is economic boost. In other words, tourism can
generate revenue for the host country, which often becomes important part of the GDP.
Thailand and Greece, for example, heavily rely on the tourism, with millions of people
contributing the economy of country.
Beyond economic improvement, second benefit is cultural exchange. When people come
from abroad, they start to learn culture of host country. As local residents contact with them,
population would learn about their culture also and be able to speaking in tourist’s national
language.

In conclusion, tourism leads to issues such as rise in the rate of carbon emission and
inflation, its positives – economic development and learning about cultures -- outweigh
disadvantages.

Tourism has become a primary revenue stream for many countries across the world.
However, tourism also causes some problems when left to its own devices. The following
essay will examine some major issues stemming from tourism as well as acknowledging its
advantages.
To start, tourism has some concerning externalities to consider, the main one of which is
environmental damage. Severe environmental harm is done to the host country when hotels
and restaurants are built at the expense of natural habitats to serve incoming visitors. Loss
of natural habitats not only disturbs the wildlife of the host country, but also locals whose
livelihood depend on those places of nature. Many forms of pollution such as air, water,
noise, and light also compound when an increasing number of people visit a country for
entertainment. All these factors undermine/compromise the quality of life in the host country.
Additionally, there is an increased risk disease outbreak with constant movement of people
around the world. The fact that (modern transportation has enabled instant travel) is a
contributing factor to global pandemics, with COVID-19 being a salient example. Unless
carefully monitored, it is quite likely that more global pandemics will occur as a result of
mass tourism.

Tourism, on the other hand, can be equally virtuous. Evidently, it is a boon to the economy.
Many jobs are created in the hospitality industry with the growth of tourism around the world
seeing as staff is required to cater for the needs of tourists. This means more and more
people can earn a living, make purchases, and essentially, be a meaningful part of the
economy. My hometown, Bukhara, has benefitted greatly from tourism with the creation of
jobs for tour guides, taxi drivers, restaurant workers and hotel employees. Furthermore,
tourism reinforces deeper cultural understanding and exchange. That is, people gain
thorough insights into other cultures when they visit historical monuments, attend foreign
traditional festivals and try foreign cuisine. This, in turn, fosters stronger intercultural bonds
among nations.

In conclusion, while the main drawbacks of tourism are a detriment to the environment and
an elevated risk of global pandemics, the positive features range from economic growth to
strong cultural ties.

Revenue- daramod
Externalities- tashqi tasirlar
Severe- qattiq, keskin
Incoming visitors- tourist
Undermine- buzadi
Compromise- murosa qilmoq
Outbreak- otilib chiqish
Salient- mashxur
Boon- ezgulik
Reinforces- mustahkamlaydi

Cater- ovqat yetkizib turadigan ish

The bar chart compares three European countries in terms of their milk export numbers from
2008 to 2012, measured in millions of tons. Overall, there was a general rise in the figures
for milk exports in all countries in question. It is also clear that Russia exported the highest
amount of milk over the whole period, while Poland exported the least.

Focusing on Italy, the amount of milk that was exported started at around 17 mt in 2008, and
then this figure increased consistently to 20 mt in 2010 before witnessing a period of stability
for one year. In 2012, this figure increased to about 22 mt. Regarding Poland, the export of
milk was around 13 mt in the initial year. Then this number fell gradually to approximately 6
mt in 2010 before increasing to around 14 mt in the final year.

Focusing on Russia, the quantity of milk was approximately 24 mt at the beginning and this
number increased gradually to 40 mt before falling to 28 mt in 2012.