9.mode 2
9.mode 2
Mode 2:
The multidisciplinary worked are Michael Gibbons, Camille
Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter
Scott and Martin Trow.
‘Mode 2’ knowledge is generated within a context of
application. This is different from the process of application
by which ‘pure’ science, generated in theoretical/
experimental environments, is ‘applied’; any technology is
‘transferred’; and knowledge is subsequently ‘managed’. The
context of application, in contrast, describes the total
environment in which scientific problems arise,
methodologies are developed, outcomes are
disseminated, and uses are defined.
Multidisciplinary teams are brought together for short
periods of time to work on specific problems in the real
world for knowledge production (applied research) in
the knowledge society.
1|Page
Mode 2 KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION
‘Mode 2’ characteristic is ‘trans-disciplinarity’, by which is
meant the mobilization of a range of theoretical
perspectives and practical methodologies to solve
problems.
‘Mode 2’ is the much greater diversity of the sites at
which knowledge is produced, and in the types of
knowledge produced.
‘Mode 2’ knowledge is that it is highly reflexive. The
research process can no longer be characterized as an
‘objective’ investigation of the natural (or social) world, or as
a cool and reductionist interrogation of arbitrarily defined
‘others’.
5 characteristics of mode 2
Commercialization of research.
The development of mass higher education.
The role of the humanities in the production of
knowledge.
Globalization.
To apply the idea of ‘Mode 2’ were the least well
developed.
Mode 2 can be explained by the way research funds are
distributed among scientists and how scientists focus on
obtaining these funds in terms of five basic features
Knowledge produced in the context of application
Transdisciplinarity
Heterogeneity and organizational diversity
Social accountability and reflexivity
Quality control
2|Page
Mode 2 KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION
Development of concept
Gibbons and colleagues argued that a new form of knowledge
production began emerging in the mid-20th century that was
context-driven, problem-focused and interdisciplinary.
It involved multidisciplinary teams that worked together for
short periods of time on specific problems in the real world.
Gibbons and his colleagues labelled this "Mode 2" knowledge
production.
He and his colleagues distinguished this from traditional
research, labelled 'Mode 1', which is academic, investigator-
initiated and discipline-based knowledge production.
In support, Limoges wrote, "We now speak of 'context-driven'
research, meaning 'research carried out in a context of
application, arising from the very work of problem solving and
not governed by the paradigms of traditional disciplines of
knowledge.
John Ziman drew a similar distinction between academic
science and post-academic science.
In 2001 Helga Nowotny, Peter Scott and Michael
Gibbons extended their analysis to the implications of Mode 2
knowledge production for society.
End
Anni Karenina.G
M.Arch (gen)
4|Page