7 Ca-At (I) 836-2024

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

14

THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL


AT NEW DELHI
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPEAL (AT) (INSOLVENCY) NO. ______ OF 2024

Arkay Logistics Limited …. Appellant


Versus
Mr. Abhijit Guhathakurta,
Liquidator of EPC Construction (India) Limited .… Respondent

MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL PREFERRED UNDER SECTION 61 OF

INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016, AGAINST THE

ORDER DATED 08.01.2024 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE NATIONAL

COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH COURT-II

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

I. DETAILS OF THE APPEAL

The present Appeal is being filed under Section 61 of the

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on behalf of the Appellant,

Arkay Logistics Limited, seeking appropriate orders and directions

setting aside the impugned order dated 08.01.2024 passed by the

Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai [“Hon’ble

Adjudicating Authority”] in IA No. 2777 of 2022 in CP. (IB)

No.1832/IBC/MB/MAHG/2017 titled Mr. Abhijit Guhathakurta

Liquidator of EPC Construction (India) Ltd., v. Arkay Logistics

Limited in the matter of IDBI Bank Ltd. v. EPC Constructions

(India) Ltd. Copy of the impugned order dated 08.01.2024, passed


15

by the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench,

is annexed hereto and marked as ANNEXURE – A/1.

II. DATE OF RECEIPT OF IMPUGNED ORDER

That the Impugned Order dated 08.01.2024 passed by the Hon’ble

Adjudicating Authority in Interlocutory Application being IA No.

2777 of 2022 in CP. (IB) No.1832/IBC/MB/MAHG/2017 and was

uploaded from the website of Hon'ble National Company Law

Tribunal on 09.01.2024 as it was not uploaded prior thereto. The

Present Appeal and a website copy of the impugned order are

being filed.

III. ADDRESS OF the Appellant

The Address of the Appellant for services is set out as under:

i) Address of the Appellant

Arkay Logistics Limited


Office No. 261, Level 2,
Upper Level, Kamala House,
Senapati Bapat Marg, Kamala City,
Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400013

ii) Address of Legal Representative

MR. HIMANSHU SATIJA / GANDHI LAW ASSOCIATES /


HARSH SAXENA / SHEVAAZ KHAN
D-2, L.G.F., GULMOHAR PARK
NEW DELHI-110049
MB: +91-8527559185
Email: [email protected]

IV. ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT

The address of the Respondents for service of all notices in the

Appeal is set out as under:


16
Mr. Abhijit Guhathakurta
Liquidator of EPC Constructions (India) Limited
1st Floor, Tower-II, Equinox Business Park
(Peninsula Techno Park), Off BKC
LBS Marg, Kurla (W)
Mumbai-70

V. JURISDICTION OF THE HON’BLE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

The Appellant humbly submits that the subject matter of the

Appeal is within the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble National Company

Law Appellate Tribunal [“Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal”] as

Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [“Code”]

states that any person aggrieved by an Order or decision of the

Hon’ble Adjudicating Authority may prefer an Appeal to this

Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal.

VI. LIMITATION

The Appellant declares that the present Appeal has been filed

within the period specified in sub-section (2) of Section 61 of the

Code, as the specified time period of 30 days for preferring the

present Appeal has not yet expired.

VII. FACTS OF THE CASE

1. The Appellant herein, namely, Arkay Logistics Limited had

various business dealings with the Corporate Debtor namely,

EPC Constructions (India) Ltd. (Formerly known as Essar

Projects (India) Limited). In light thereof, Appellant had

receivables from the Corporate Debtor namely, EPC

Constructions (India) Ltd. (Formerly known as Essar Projects

(India) Limited) to the tune of Rs. 16,35,63,970/-.


17
2. The Corporate Debtor, vide Assignment Agreement dated

15.06.16 (“Assignment Agreement”), assigned all its liabilities

(including liabilities towards Appellant) to one entity namely

Imperial Consultants & Securities (“ICS”) w.e.f. 01.04.16. As per

statutory requirements, the said assignment was done after taking

consent from the Appellant.

3. Pursuant to the said Assignment Agreement, the Corporate

Debtor vide its letter dated 15.06.16 informed the Appellant

about the assignment of the debt due to the Appellant to ICS.

4. That ICS, through a letter dated 01.07.16, provided assurance

to the Appellant regarding the repayment of the outstanding

amount by 31.12.16. Additionally, ICS, in the aforementioned

correspondence, suggested to the Appellant that in the event of

ICS's default in payment, the Appellant would retain the right to

rescind its acceptance of the Assignment Agreement, thereby

reinstating the liability of the Corporate Debtor to repay the said

debt to the Appellant.

5. The Appellant vide its letter dated 02.01.17 duly notified ICS of

its failure to fulfill the payment obligation by the agreed deadline

of December 31, 2016. Consequently, the Appellant exercised

its right to revoke the assignment, thereby entitling the Appellant

to outstanding receivables amounting from the Corporate

Debtor herein.

6. The Corporate Debtor vide its letter dated 14.02.17 requested

the Appellant herein to reconsider the revocation of assignment

agreement with the following broad proposal:


18
 The Appellant’s outstanding dues will be cleared by the

Corporate Debtor on or before 31.03.2017;

 The Appellant shall be required to refund the said amount

within 15 days in case receipt of any payment from ICS under

the Assignment Agreement.

7. That in the interim, as the Corporate Debtor was facing a

liquidity crunch, it had also taken a short-term advance of INR

3,00,00,000 (Rupees Three Crores Only) from the Appellant.

8. Therefore, from 01.03.17 to 18.01.18, in lieu of the debt due and

payable by the Corporate Debtor to the Appellant, the Corporate

Debtor paid an amount of INR. 18,10,00,000 (Rupees Eighteen

Crores Ten Lakhs Only) to the Appellant. In addition, the

Appellant has placed its own fixed deposits as the security to

facilitate the issuance of Bank Guarantee for fulfilling the

conditions of the contract secured by the Corporate Debtor and

the Liquidator, while acting as the Monitoring Agency of the

Corporate Debtor, has admitted the fact in its affidavit-in-reply

dt. 25.09.20 to the application bearing no. 1152 of 2020 in CP

(IB) 3249 of 2018 filed by the Appellant’s Interim Resolution

Professional before the Hon’ble NCLT, Mumbai that the

Applicant has provided the security for the facility extended to

the Corporate Debtor by Axis Bank Limited for an amount of

Rs.21,18,00,000/- through its Two (2) fixed deposits booked by

Axis Bank Limited for an amount of Rs.14,58,00,000/- and

Rs.6,60,00,000/- bearing no. 917040024014860 and

917040024016002, respectively, totaling to an amount of


19
Rs.21,18,00,000/-.

9. In the meanwhile, the Adjudicating Authority, vide its order

dated 20.04.18, initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution

Process of EPC Constructions (India) Ltd.

10. The Adjudicating Authority vide its order dated 07.05.21

directed for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor as a going

concern and appointed Respondent No. 1 as its Liquidator.

11. Pursuant thereto, the Respondent No. 1 filed an Interlocutory

Application being IA No. 2777 of 2023 before the Hon’ble

Adjudicating Authority, praying inter alia for a direction against

the Appellant to pay an amount of Rs 18.10 Cr to the Corporate

Debtor.

A copy of the Application bearing I.A. No. 2777 of 2023 filed by

the Respondent No. 1 is annexed herewith and marked as

Annexure – A-2.

12. It is the case of the Respondent No. 1 that:

(a) On 18.01.17, the Corporate Debtor had been awarded a

contract by GSPL India Gasnet Limited ["GIGL"] on 18.01.2017,

pursuant to which it had to submit a Performance Bank

Guarantee ["PBG"], amounting to INR 21,17,00,000 [Indian

Rupees Twenty-One Crores Seventeen Lakhs Only].

(b) Owing to the liquidity problems at that time, the Corporate

Debtor requested the Appellant to arrange for issuance of the

required PBG from their existing line of credit with Axis Bank.

Such an arrangement was agreed to, and Axis Bank at the

You might also like