1991 Revised Rule On Summary Procedure
1991 Revised Rule On Summary Procedure
1991 Revised Rule On Summary Procedure
Pursuant to Section 36 of the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980 (B.P Blg. 129)
and to achieve an expeditious and inexpensive determination of the cases
referred to herein, the Court Resolved to promulgate the following Revised Rule
on Summary Procedure:
I.
Applicability
Section 1. Scope. — This rule shall govern the summary procedure in the
Metropolitan Trial Courts, the Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, the Municipal Trial
Courts, and the Municipal Circuit Trial Courts in the following cases falling within
their jurisdiction:
A. Civil Cases:
B. Criminal Cases:
This Rule shall not apply to a civil case where the plaintiffs cause of action is
pleaded in the same complaint with another cause of action subject to the
ordinary procedure; nor to a criminal case where the offense charged is
necessarily related to another criminal case subject to the ordinary procedure.
II.
Civil Cases
Sec. 3. Pleadings. —
Sec. 4. Duty of court. — After the court determines that the case falls under
summary procedure, it may, from an examination of the allegations therein and
such evidence as may be attached thereto, dismiss the case outright on any of
the grounds apparent therefrom for the dismissal of a civil action. If no ground
for dismissal is found it shall forthwith issue summons which shall state that the
summary procedure under this Rule shall apply.
Sec. 5. Answer. — Within ten (10) days from service of summons, the defendant
shall file his answer to the complaint and serve a copy thereof on the plaintiff.
Affirmative and negative defenses not pleaded therein shall be deemed waived,
except for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. Cross-claims and
compulsory counterclaims not asserted in the answer shall be considered
barred. The answer to counterclaims or cross-claims shall be filed and served
within ten (10) days from service of the answer in which they are pleaded.
Sec. 6. Effect of failure to answer. — Should the defendant fail to answer the
complaint within the period above provided, the court, motu proprio, or on motion
of the plaintiff, shall render judgment as may be warranted by the facts alleged in
the complaint and limited to what is prayed for therein: Provided, however, that
the court may in its discretion reduce the amount of damages and attorney's fees
claimed for being excessive or otherwise unconscionable. This is without
prejudice to the applicability of Section 4, Rule 15 of the Rules of Court, if there
are two or more defendants.
If a sole defendant shall fail to appear, the plaintiff shall be entitled to judgment
in accordance with Section 6 hereof. This Rule shall not apply where one of two
or more defendants sued under a common cause of action who had pleaded a
common defense shall appear at the preliminary conference.
Sec. 8. Record of preliminary conference. — Within five (5) days after the
termination of the preliminary conference, the court shall issue an order stating
the matters taken up therein, including but not limited to:
a) Whether the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, and if so, the
terms thereof;
b) The stipulations or admissions entered into by the parties;.
c) Whether, on the basis of the pleadings and the stipulations and
admissions made by the parties, judgment may be rendered without the
need of further proceedings, in which event the judgment shall be
rendered within thirty (30) days from issuance of the order;
d) A clear specification of material facts which remain controverted; and
e) Such other matters intended to expedite the disposition of the case.
Sec. 9. Submission of affidavits and position papers. — Within ten (10) days
from receipt of the order mentioned in the next preceding section, the parties
shall submit the affidavits of their witnesses and other evidence on the factual
issues defined in the order, together with their position papers setting forth the
law and the facts relied upon by them.
Sec. 10. Rendition of judgment. — Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the last
affidavits and position papers, or the expiration of the period for filing the same,
the court shall render judgment.
However should the court find it necessary to clarify certain material facts, it
may, during the said period, issue an order specifying the matters to be clarified,
and require the parties to submit affidavits or other evidence on the said matters
within ten (10) days from receipt of said order. Judgment shall be rendered
within fifteen (15) days after the receipt of the last clarificatory affidavits, or the
expiration of the period for filing the same.
The court shall not resort to the clarificatory procedure to gain time for the
rendition of the judgment.
III.
Criminal Cases
Sec. 11. How commenced. — The filing of criminal cases falling within the
scope of this Rule shall be either by complaint or by information: Provided,
however, that in Metropolitan Manila and in Chartered Cities. such cases shall be
commenced only by information, except when the offense cannot be prosecuted
de oficio.
Sec. 13. Arraignment and trial. — Should the court, upon a consideration of the
complaint or information and the affidavits submitted by both parties, find no
cause or ground to hold the accused for trial, it shall order the dismissal of the
case; otherwise, the court shall set the case for arraignment and trial.
Sec. 14. Preliminary conference. — Before conducting the trial, the court shall
call the parties to a preliminary conference during which a stipulation of facts
may be entered into, or the propriety of allowing the accused to enter a plea of
guilty to a lesser offense may be considered, or such other matters may be taken
up to clarify the issues and to ensure a speedy disposition of the case.However,
no admission by the accused shall be used against him unless reduced to writing
and signed by the accused and his counsel.A refusal or failure to stipulate shall
not prejudice the accused.
Sec. 15. Procedure of trial. — At the trial, the affidavits submitted by the parties
shall constitute the direct testimonies of the witnesses who executed the same.
Witnesses who testified may be subjected to cross-examination, redirect or re-
cross examination. Should the affiant fail to testify, his affidavit shall not be
considered as competent evidence for the party presenting the affidavit, but the
adverse party may utilize the same for any admissible purpose.
Sec. 16. Arrest of accused. — The court shall not order the arrest of the accused
except for failure to appear whenever required. Release of the person arrested
shall either be on bail or on recognizance by a responsible citizen acceptable to
the court.
Sec. 17. Judgment. — Where a trial has been conducted, the court shall
promulgate the judgment not later than thirty (30) days after the termination of
trial.
IV.
COMMON PROVISIONS
Sec. 18. Referral to Lupon. — Cases requiring referral to the Lupon for
conciliation under the provisions of Presidential Decree No. 1508 where there is
no showing of compliance with such requirement, shall be dismissed without
prejudice and may be revived only after such requirement shall have been
complied with. This provision shall not apply to criminal cases where the
accused was arrested without a warrant.
Sec. 19. Prohibited pleadings and motions. — The following pleadings, motions
or petitions shall not be allowed in the cases covered by this Rule:
Sec. 20. Affidavits. — The affidavits required to be submitted under this Rule
shall state only facts of direct personal knowledge of the affiants which are
admissible in evidence, and shall show their competence to testify to the matters
stated therein.
A violation of this requirement may subject the party or the counsel who submits
the same to disciplinary action, and shall be cause to expunge the inadmissible
affidavit or portion thereof from the record.
Sec. 21. Appeal. — The judgment or final order shall be appealable to the
appropriate regional trial court which shall decide the same in accordance with
Section 22 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129. The decision of the regional trial court in
civil cases governed by this Rule, including forcible entry and unlawful detainer,
shall be immediately executory, without prejudice to a further appeal that may be
taken therefrom. Section 10 of Rule 70 shall be deemed repealed.
Sec. 22. Applicability of the regular rules. — The regular procedure prescribed in
the Rules of Court shall apply to the special cases herein provided for in a
suppletory capacity insofar as they are not inconsistent herewith.