Performance Measurement - Formatted
Performance Measurement - Formatted
Key Concepts
Vision statement
Mission statement
which is in line with the values and expectations of the stakeholders. It includes:
• General goals
• Culture
• Stakeholders
Mission Statement:
Characteristics of mission statement
• Brevity
• Flexibility
• Distinctiveness
Coca cola mission: To refresh the world, To create value and make difference, To inspire
Mission statement : What’s wrong with the world and how you intend to fix it.
Vision statement : What the world will look like after you’ve finished changing it.
Goals:
The goals set for different parts of the organization should be consistent with each other (goal
Non-operational goals: Not all the goals can be measured. For example, a university
Goals:
• If the departments achieve their objectives, the organization will achieve its goal.
• Specific
• Measurable
• Attainable
• Result orientated
• Time bounded
Objectives:
Primary Objectives: are the main objectives, like profit maximization.
Secondary Objectives: are objectives that helps in achieving the primary ones, like cost
Strategic objectives: would include matters such as required level of company profitability.
Tactical objectives: would concern with efficient and effective use of organizational
resources.
Operation objectives: would include guidelines for ensuring that specific tasks are carried
out.
Objectives:
Trade-off between the objectives: It relates, when some objectives might be achieved on the
expense of others. For example, a company’s objective of achieving good profits and
profit growth might have adverse consequences for the cash flows of the business, of the
Short-termism: is when there is a bias towards short-term rather than long-term performance.
It is often due to the fact that managers' performance is measured on short-term results.
Objectives:
Methods to encourage a long-term view:
• Ratio analysis.
• Variance analysis
RATIO ANALYSIS: Several profitability and liquidity measures can be applied to divisional
performance reports.
1. Financial Performance Measures:
Profitability Ratios: The operating efficiency of a firm and its ability to ensure ample returns to
Gross profit margin: Gross profit margin ratio indicates how efficiently the material, labour
100
1. Financial Performance Measures:
Operating profit margin: Operating profit is an income of the company that is generated
from its own operations. It excludes income from investment in other businesses. The
operating profit ratio measures the operating efficiency and pricing efficiency through
cost control. If profit margin unsatisfactory means excessive cost or low selling price.
100
100
1. Financial Performance Measures:
Return on capital employed (ROCE): This ratio expresses profits earned as a
proportion of capital employed. It illustrates how efficiently the company is using its
capital to generate profits.
100
Advantages:
• Easy to Calculate
• Easy to Understand
• Uses easily available data
• Measures how well a business is utilizing the funds invested in it.
Disadvantages of ROCE:
• Manager feels reluctant to invest in P & M
• Unfair to compare ROCE of two different departments with Assets of two different age
• Short-termism
Residual income = Profit before interest and tax + Profit from any other investments –
(net) assets to gearing $1 sales. Generally, the higher a company’s total net asset
turnover, the more efficiently its assets have been used. The total net asset turnover is
and prospective and present shareholder, will also be interested in the measure. It is
calculated as,
attributable to each ordinary share or, what each share has generated in terms of
profits. Investors compare the EPS of the company with the industry average and with
ℎ ℎ
ℎ
ℎ
Price earnings ratio (P/E ratio) : Price earnings ratio compares current market price of
each share with the per share earnings in order to assess the company’s performance. A
high P/E ratio indicates that investors are expecting higher growth in future compared to
companies with low P/E ratio. It is more useful to compare one company’s P/E ratio with
that of the other companies in the same industry or the market in general and with the
financial health of any company too much liquidity is a misuse of money, and too little leads
Current ratio: Current ratio measures the short-term solvency of a firm. The higher the
current ratio, the larger is the amount of current assets in relation to current liabilities and
the company’s ability to meet its current obligations is greater too. If the current ratio is
2:1 or more, the company is generally considered to have good short-term financial
strength. If the current ratio is less than 1 (liabilities exceed current assets), the company
%
Quick ratio or acid test ratio: Quick ratio determines the relationship between liquid
assets and current liabilities. Liquid assets are the assets that can be easily and
immediately converted into cash without loss of value. A quick ratio of 1 to 1 or more
' ( "$
& "$
%
Receivables collection period:
Credit Sales
Credit Purchases
Gearing Ratios: The debt position of a company indicates the amount of other people money
(other than the owner’s money) that is being used by it in generating its profit. Typically,
attention is placed on long-term debts, since these commit the company to pay interest over
Gearing ratio (debt to equity ratio): The ratio indicates the relationship between the long-
term funds provided by the loan group and those provided by the company’s owner. The
figure is only meaningful in light of the company’s business and comparison with other
organizations within the industry is useful.
Dividend cover: A high dividend covers means that a high proportion of profit is being
retuned, which might indicates that the company is investing to achieve earning growth
in the future.
• Based on historical data and thus the ratio may not be a good guide to the future.
• Quality of the analysis is determined by the quality of the accounting information.
• Difference in accounting practices adopt by company over the treatment of fixed asset
depreciation and revaluation , stock valuation, research and development expenditure,
good will write off and profit recognition
• The change value of money and differences in trading enjoinments over time
• A difficulty in deciding on a suitable yardstick and the interpretation of change.
• The use of ratios to measure performance may encourage sub-optimal behaviours by
managers e.g. short term manipulation of results
• Ratios are normally based exclusively on finance, and reflect only financial indicators of
performance. There are of coursed non financial implications associated with performance
Traceable And Controllable Costs
The main problem with measuring controllable performance is in deciding which costs
are controllable and which costs are traceable. The performance of the manager of the
division is indicated by the controllable profit (and it is on this that he is judged) and the
shareholders?
3. Internal business perspective (process efficiency) – “what must process we excel at?”
1. Financial perspective: This considers how the organisation can create value for its
stakeholders. Performance measures are likely to include traditional financial measures of
profitability, cash flow and sales growth. This focuses on satisfying shareholder value.
Appropriate performance measures are ROCE and Profit Margins.
excel if it is to achieve customer satisfaction and financial success. Measures might include
the speed of innovation, the quality of after sales service or manufacturing time. This aims to
measure the organization’s output in terms of technical excellence and consumer needs.
Unit cost
Quality measurement
Balanced Scorecard
4. Innovation and learning perspective: This looks at the organisation’s capacity to maintain
its competitive position through the acquisition of new skills and the development of new
products and services. This focus on the need for continual improvement of existing
products and techniques and developing new ones to meet customers’ changing
needs.
Advantages Explanation
Managers need to look at both internal and external matters affecting
All four perspectives
the organization. They also need to link together financial and non-
considered by
financial measures. Therefore they can see how factors in one area
managers
affect all other areas.
It can be difficult to incorporate objectives into control systems such as
Consistency budgets. So targets set by a budget, say, may conflict with objectives.
between Moreover, staff may put their own interpretation on objectives against the
objectives, control actual intention of the original objective. The balanced scorecard should
systems and staff improve communication between different levels of the organisation. The
balanced scorecard strives to keep all these factors in balance.
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Balance Scorecard
Disadvantages Explanation
Some measures in the scorecard, such as research funding and cost
Conflicting measures reduction, may naturally conflict. It is often difficult to determine the
balance that will achieve the best results.
Not only do appropriate measures have to be devised but the number
Selecting measures of measures used must also be agreed. Care must be taken that the
impact of the results is not lost in a sea of information.
Measurement is only useful if it initiates appropriate action. Non-
Expertise financial managers may have difficulty with the usual profit measures.
With more measures to consider this problem will be compounded.
Even a financially trained manager may have difficulty in putting the
Interpretation
figures into an overall perspective.
Application Of Balanced Scorecard
Balanced Scorecard For A Restaurant
Goals Measures (KPI)
Financial success
To grow and open new restaurants New restaurants opened
Profitable Net profit margins
Customer Satisfaction
Great services Excellent results on customer survey
Repeat business Customers booking to come again
Innovative food New menus on a regular basis
Process Efficiency
Timely food delivery Time from order to delivery
Efficient staff Processing of food order, few mistakes
Low food wastage Amount of food discarded
Growth
Trained staff Employees with relevant training
New menu choices Number of new dishes introduced
Value For Money (Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness)
Value for money means providing a service in a way which is economical, efficient and
effective. It is often referred to as the 3E's - Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness.
• Economy: It implies that the least possible cost should be incurred for acquiring and using
resources, while maintaining the appropriate quality ('doing things at a low price') like more
clean plates per pound.
• Effectiveness: It focuses on the achievement of the desired objectives through the spending
of available funds. It is concerned with the relationship between the planned results and the
actual results of projects, programs and other activities ('doing the right things'). Like plates
as clean as they should be
• Efficiency: It is attaining desired results at minimum cost. It implies the maximizing of output
input ratio i.e. per unit of input the output should be the most. It is concerned with the
relationship the resources (input) and the output of goods, services and other results. Ideally,
maximum output should be achieved for a given input.
Performance Measurement In Service Sectors:
There are 6 key dimensions to performance in the service sector:
1. Competitive Performance
2. Financial Performance
3. Quality
4. Resource utilization
5. Flexibility
6. Innovation
Together these areas influence the competitiveness of the business and ultimately its
profitability.
Performance Measurement In Service Sectors:
Ability to respond in This will depend on type of services professional service such as legal
advice must tailored exactly the customer’s needs
customer’s specification
This is measureable in quantity terms. E.g. train company can measure
Coping with demand
exact overcrowding
Performance Measurement In Service Sectors:
6. Innovation: How much cost it will take to develop new service and how effective this
• Time between the identification of customer need and for a new service and making
it available.
Benchmarking
comparators, through whose use relative levels of performance (and particularly areas of
Types of benchmarking
within an organisation. Data for this is easy to obtain and conditions are often comparable.
Learning may be limited as comparisons are only being made within the same company.
Benchmarking
2. Competitive benchmarking: This involves comparing performance with that of direct
competitors. The potential for learning is improved but data may be difficult to obtain. For
commercial reasons firms are often unwilling to divulge information to direct competitors.
The growth of benchmarking clubs and trade associations has reduced the problems of
competitive benchmarking.
3. Functional benchmarking: Various functions in the business are compared with those
recognised as the best external practitioners of the function. A manufacturing company
could compare its invoice preparation time with that of a credit card company, its delivery
time with a firm of couriers etc. The potential for learning how to improve performance is
very high, but comparability problems sometimes exist. (This is sometimes referred to as
operational or generic benchmarking)
Benchmarking
4. Strategic benchmarking: This involves comparison of performance with competitors at the
strategic level. Areas such as market share and return on capital employed could be
considered. Such comparisons are important in designing competitive strategy.
Reverse engineering: Buying a competitor’s product and dismantling it in order to understand its
content and configuration.
PROBLEMS:
• Tunnel vision: an obsession with maximizing measured performance at the expense of non-
measured performance e.g. staff welfare.
• Myopia (shortsightedness): maximizing short run performance at the expense of long run
success.
• Manipulation of data: “creative” reporting e.g. trying to classify all adverse variances as
planning variances.
• Gaming: e.g. building slack into budgets.
Solutions:
• Participation: involve staff at all levels in the design and implementation of the system.
• Encourage a long-term view among staff e.g. through company share option scheme.
terms of inputs and outputs which ties in with the Value for Money criteria.
• Economy
• Efficiency
• Effectiveness
• Judgments.
• Comparisons.