Technical Specification MEF 14

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

November, 2005

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Disclaimer The information in this publication is freely available for reproduction and use by any recipient and is believed to be accurate as of its publication date. Such information is subject to change without notice and the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) is not responsible for any errors. The MEF does not assume responsibility to update or correct any information in this publication. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the MEF concerning the completeness, accuracy, or applicability of any information contained herein and no liability of any kind shall be assumed by the MEF as a result of reliance upon such information. The information contained herein is intended to be used without modification by the recipient or user of this document. The MEF is not responsible or liable for any modifications to this document made by any other party. The receipt or any use of this document or its contents does not in any way create, by implication or otherwise: (a) any express or implied license or right to or under any patent, copyright, trademark or trade secret rights held or claimed by any MEF member company which are or may be associated with the ideas, techniques, concepts or expressions contained herein; nor (b) any warranty or representation that any MEF member companies will announce any product(s) and/or service(s) related thereto, or if such announcements are made, that such announced product(s) and/or service(s) embody any or all of the ideas, technologies, or concepts contained herein; nor (c) any form of relationship between any MEF member companies and the recipient or user of this document. Implementation or use of specific Metro Ethernet standards or recommendations and MEF specifications will be voluntary, and no company shall be obliged to implement them by virtue of participation in the Metro Ethernet Forum. The MEF is a non-profit international organization accelerating industry cooperation on Metro Ethernet technology. The MEF does not, expressly or otherwise, endorse or promote any specific products or services. The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. All Rights Reserved.

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Table of Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 1 Terminology......................................................................................................................... 1 Scope..................................................................................................................................... 4 Compliance Levels .............................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 Test Configuration .............................................................................................................. 7 Template for Abstract Test Cases for Traffic Management ........................................... 9 Abstract Test Cases for EVC Related Performance Service Attributes ...................... 10 Abstract Test Cases for Bandwidth Profiles Service Attributes .................................. 14 References .......................................................................................................................... 22

List of Figures
Figure 1; Relationship between different MEF Service Group documents and the Ethernet Services Test Definition Documents ...........................................................................................................................................................5 Figure 2: Relationship between Ethernet Service Documents and Abstract Test Cases for Ethernet Services at the UNI ......................................................................................................................................................................6 Figure 3: Test Configuration for Ethernet Services at the UNI .....................................................................................7 Figure 4: CE-VLAN ID/EVC Maps for the ingress and egress UNIs ..........................................................................8 Figure 5: Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes.............................................................................................................8 Figure 6: EVC Performance Service Attributes.............................................................................................................8

List of Test Cases

Test Case 1: Frame Delay Service Performance .......................................................................................................... 11 Test Case 2: Frame Delay Variation Service Performance .......................................................................................... 12 Test Case 3: Frame Loss Ratio Service Performance .................................................................................................. 13 Test Case 4: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR > 0 and EIR = 0 .......................................................... 15 Test Case 5: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR = 0 and EIR > 0 .......................................................... 16 Test Case 6: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR > 0 and EIR > 0 .......................................................... 17 Test Case 7: Bandwidth Profile per Ingress UNI ......................................................................................................... 18 Test Case 8: Bandwidth Profile per EVC .................................................................................................................... 19 Test Case 9: Bandwidth Profile per Class of Service .................................................................................................. 20 Test Case 10: Multiple Bandwidth Profiles at the UNI ............................................................................................... 21

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page i

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

1. Abstract
This document defines the requirements and corresponding test procedures for Service Performance and Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes that may be specified as part of a Service Level Specification (SLS) for an Ethernet Service. Requirements are derived from Metro Ethernet Forum Technical Committee documents.

2. Terminology
All to One Bundling Bandwidth Profile A UNI attribute in which all CE-VLAN IDs are associated with a single EVC. A characterization of ingress Service Frame arrival times and lengths at a reference point and a specification of the disposition of each Service Frame based on its level of compliance with the Bandwidth Profile. In this document the reference point is the UNI. A Service Frame that has the broadcast destination MAC address. A UNI attribute in which more than one CE-VLAN ID can be associated with an EVC. Committed Burst Size Customer Edge Customer Edge VLAN CoS Customer Edge VLAN ID An EVC attribute in which the CE-VLAN ID of an egress Service Frame is identical in value to the CE-VLAN ID of the corresponding ingress Service Frame. An association of CE-VLAN IDs with EVCs at a UNI. Customer Edge VLAN Tag Coupling Flag Committed Information Rate A set of Service Frames that have a commitment from the Service Provider to receive a particular level of performance. Information derivable from a) the EVC to which the Service Frame is mapped or b) the combination of the EVC to which the Service Frame is mapped and a set of one or more CE-VLAN CoS values. Color Mode

Broadcast Service Frame Bundling CBS CE CE-VLAN CoS CE-VLAN ID CE-VLAN ID Preservation

CE-VLAN ID/EVC Map CE-VLAN Tag CF CIR Class of Service Class of Service Identifier

CM

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 1

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Color Mode

CM is a Bandwidth Profile parameter. The Color Mode parameter indicates whether the color-aware or color-blind property is employed by the Bandwidth Profile. It takes a value of color-blind or color-aware only. A Bandwidth Profile property where a pre-determined level of Bandwidth Profile compliance for each Service Frame is taken into account when determining the level of compliance for each Service Frame. A Bandwidth Profile property where a pre-determined level of Bandwidth Profile compliance for each Service Frame, if present, is ignored when determining the level of compliance for each Service Frame. CBS is a Bandwidth Profile parameter. It limits the maximum number of bytes available for a burst of ingress Service Frames sent at the UNI speed to remain CIR-conformant. CIR is a Bandwidth Profile parameter. It defines the average rate in bits/s of ingress Service Frames up to which the network delivers Service Frames and meets the performance objectives defined by the CoS Service Attribute. CF is a Bandwidth Profile parameter. The Coupling Flag allows the choice between two modes of operations of the rate enforcement algorithm. It takes a value of 0 or 1 only. Equipment on the Subscriber side of the UNI. The user priority bits in the IEEE 802.1Q Tag in a Service Frame that is either tagged or priority tagged. The identifier derivable from the content of a Service Frame that allows the Service Frame to be associated with an EVC at the UNI. The IEEE 802.1Q Tag in a tagged Service Frame. Excess Burst Size A Service Frame sent from the Service Provider network to the CE. Excess Information Rate Ethernet LAN Service Ethernet Line Service An Ethernet Service Type distinguished by its use of a Multipointto-Multipoint EVC. An Ethernet Service Type distinguished by its use of a Point-toPoint EVC. An association of two or more UNIs that limits the exchange of Service Frames to UNIs in the Ethernet Virtual Connection.
Page 2

Color-aware

Color-blind

Committed Burst Size

Committed Rate

Information

Coupling Flag

Customer Edge Customer Edge VLAN CoS Customer Edge VLAN ID

Customer Edge VLAN Tag EBS Egress Service Frame EIR E-LAN Service E-Line Service Ethernet LAN Service Ethernet Line Service Ethernet Virtual Connection
MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

EVC Excess Burst Size

Ethernet Virtual Connection EBS is a Bandwidth Profile parameter. It limits the maximum number of bytes available for a burst of ingress Service Frames sent at the UNI speed to remain EIR-conformant. EIR is a Bandwidth Profile parameter. It defines the average rate in bits/s of ingress Service Frames up to which the network may deliver Service Frames without any performance objectives. Frame Delay Frame Delay Variation Frame Loss Ratio Short for Ethernet frame. The time required to transmit a Service Frame from source to destination across the metro Ethernet network. A measure of the delays experienced by different Service Frames belonging to the same CoS instance. The difference in delay of two Service Frames. A measure of the variation in the delays experienced by different Service Frames belonging to the same CoS instance. Frame Loss Ratio is a measure of the number of lost frames inside the MEN. Frame Loss Ratio is expressed as a percentage. A Service Frame sent from the CE into the Service Provider network. A Service Frame that is used for Layer 2 control, e.g., Spanning Tree Protocol. The process by which a Layer 2 Control Protocol Service Frame is passed through the Service Provider network without being processed and is delivered unchanged to the proper UNI(s). A Service Frame that has a multicast destination MAC address. An EVC with two or more UNIs. A Multipoint-to-Multipoint EVC with two UNIs is different from a Point-to-Point EVC because one or more additional UNIs can be added to it. An EVC with exactly 2 UNIs. An Ethernet frame transmitted across the UNI toward the Service Provider or an Ethernet frame transmitted across the UNI toward the Subscriber. The contract between the Subscriber and Service Provider specifying the agreed to service level commitments and related business agreements.

Excess Information Rate

FD FDV FLR Frame Frame Delay Frame Delay Performance Frame Delay Variation Frame Delay Performance Variation

Frame Loss Ratio Performance Ingress Service Frame Layer 2 Control Protocol Service Frame Layer 2 Control Protocol Tunneling Multicast Service Frame Multipoint-to-Multipoint EVC Point-to-Point EVC Service Frame

Service Level Agreement

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 3

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Service Level Specification Service Multiplexing Service Provider SLA SLS Subscriber UNI Unicast Service Frame User Network Interface

The technical specification of the service level being offered by the Service Provider to the Subscriber. A UNI service attribute in which the UNI can be in more than one EVC instance. The organization providing Ethernet Service(s). Service Level Agreement Service Level Specification The organization purchasing and/or using Ethernet Services. User Network Interface A Service Frame that has a unicast destination MAC address. The physical demarcation point between the responsibility of the Service Provider and the responsibility of the Subscriber.

3. Scope
This document defines the requirements and corresponding test procedures for Service Performance and Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes that may be specified as part of a Service Level Specification (SLS) for an Ethernet Service. As with MEF 9 Abstract Test Suite for Ethernet Services at the UNI [3], the tests in this specification are defined from the point of view of the Subscribers equipment that is used to access the services. The requirements defined in this document are based on Sections 6.7 and 7.10 of MEF 10 Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1 [1]. Section 6.7 of MEF 10 [1] defines three EVC Related Performance Service Attributes: Frame Delay Performance, Frame Delay Variation Performance, and Frame Loss Ratio Performance. Section 7.10 of MEF 10 defines Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes of an Ethernet Service at the UNI. Bandwidth Profiles Service Attributes are defined per Ingress UNI, per EVC, and per Class of Service. Six parameters are applied to Bandwidth Profiles: Committed Information Rate (CIR), Committed Burst Size (CBS), Excess Information Rate (EIR), Excess Burst Size (EBS), Coupling Flag (CF) and Color Mode (CM). In the absence of a standard way to color Service Frames, tests are not defined in relation to CF and CM parameters that may be applied to a Bandwidth Profile. Such tests may be added in the future when Service Frame Coloring is further specified. When combined with MEF 9 [3], this specification covers all of the EVC and UNI related Service Attributes specified in MEF 10 [1]. Together they provide a comprehensive set of Test Cases to determine the readiness of a Metro Ethernet Network (MEN) to deliver various Ethernet Services, such as Ethernet Line (E-Line) and Ethernet LAN (E-LAN) services when Service Performance and Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes are specified. Implementation specifications are outside the scope of this document. This document may be updated in the future to reflect new work in the MEF Technical Committee.

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 4

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

4. Compliance Levels
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [5]. All key words must be in upper case, bold text.

5. Introduction
This document completes MEF 9 [3] by adding requirements and test procedures for Service Performance and Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes defined in MEF 10 [1]. As with MEF 9, vendors can refer to the requirements and test procedures defined in this specification in the development and commercial cycles of their products, carriers can use them to ensure that the networks they deploy will have the ability to deliver Ethernet Services that support Service Level Specifications defined by the Technical Committee of the Metro Ethernet Forum and subscribers can attach to the MEN knowing that the Ethernet Services they access satisfy criteria based on accepted requirements and test procedures. The definition of the requirements a MEN must satisfy to deliver Services to which Traffic and Performance parameters are applied is tightly based on the MEF 10 [1]. The Ethernet Service Definition Framework was created by the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) to provide the service attributes and parameters to create an Ethernet service. The relationship between the Ethernet Services Test Definition documents and the two MEF services documents is illustrated in Figure 1. MEF 6 Ethernet Services Definitions

MEF 10 Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1

MEF 9 & MEF 14 Ethernet Services Test Definitions

Figure 1: Relationship between different MEF Services Group documents and the Ethernet Services Test Definition Documents

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 5

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

The fundamental service constructs defined in MEF 10 [1] are Ethernet Service Types. These have two types of Service Attributes associated with them, those associated with the UNI, and those associated with the EVC. This specification defines requirements and test procedures based on the Performance Service Attributes which are associated with the EVC and on the Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes which are associated with the UNI. MEF 10 [1] also defines the type of parameter values associated with each of these Service Attributes. A conceptual schematic of the relationship between the MEF Technical Committee Ethernet Services documents and the derived MEN requirements and correspondingly defined test definitions is represented in Figure 2.

ETHERNET SERVICES MODEL

ETHERNET SERVICES DEFINITIONS

ETHERNET SERVICES ATTRIBUTES MODEL LEVEL MEN REQUIREMENTS SERVICE LEVEL MEN REQUIREMENTS ATTRIBUTE LEVEL MODEL LEVEL TEST DEFINITIONS SERVICE LEVEL TEST DEFINITIONS ATTRIBUTE LEVEL TEST DEFINTIONS PARAMETER LEVEL TEST DEFINITIONS MEN REQUIREMENTS PARAMETER LEVEL MEN REQUIREMENTS ETHERNET SERVICES PARAMETERS

Figure 2: Relationship between Ethernet Service Documents and Abstract Test Cases for Ethernet Services at the UNI

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 6

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

6. Test Configuration
Although some tests may require very specific test configurations, most tests defined in this document are to be executed by attaching the Ethernet interface or interfaces of a Tester to the Ethernet interface or interfaces at the UNI. Since the UNI is the physical demarcation point which delimits the responsibilities of the Subscriber and the Service Provider, the Tester attached in this way sees a MEN from the point of view of the Subscribers equipment and can test a MENs ability to offer Ethernet Services to the Subscriber. We schematically represent the attachment of the Tester to the MEN in Figure 3
Test Configuration for Ethernet Services at the UNI
User Network Interface (UNI) Testers generating receiving monitoring frames at the UNI User Network Interface (UNI)

Metro Ethernet Network

Testers generating receiving monitoring frames at the UNI

Testers physically attach to the MEN at the UNI Testers may be attached to the MEN at multiple UNIs

Figure 3: Test Configuration for Ethernet Services at the UNI The Test Configuration for each Test Case describes the number of EVCs associating the number of UNIs in the Test Case and the number of CE-VLAN IDs mapped to the EVCs. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs in all Test Cases. CE-VLAN ID/EVC Maps are given for each Test Case.

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 7

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

In this document CE-VLAN ID/EVC Maps for the ingress and egress UNIs as in Figure 4, specific Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes as in Figure 5 and EVC Performance Service Attributes as in Figure 6 are suggested for each Test Case.
INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1

Figure 4: CE-VLAN ID/EVC Maps for the ingress and egress UNIs
Per Ingress UNI UNI Bandwidth Profile Parameters UNI A CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A Note 1 : (0 < CIR A UNI Speed), (CBS A maximum Service Frame size)

Figure 5: Bandwidth Profile Service Attributes

CoS Identifier 1

EVC Performance Service Attributes Frame Delay (FD) Performance Frame Delay Variation (FDV) Performance Frame Loss Ratio (FLR) Performance

Performance Objectives FD 1 FDV 1 FLR 1

Figure 6: EVC Performance Service Attributes

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 8

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

7. Template for Abstract Test Cases for Traffic Management

We adopt the following template for the definition of Abstract Test Cases for Management:
ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Name derived from reference document A punctuated alphanumeric string assigned to each defined requirement and test procedure couple using the following convention: one to three letter abbreviated source document name. section number - paragraph number in the section from which requirement is derived. This number always figures as the last number of an ID. Ethernet Services Model=M; Ethernet Services Definitions=S. Example: M.6.1-4 Reference document and section (and paragraph when useful for clarity) Functional, Conformance, Interoperability or Performance Mandatory, optional Brief description of the service requirement that the MEN MUST or SHOULD satisfy Succinct description of test purpose Succinct description of test bed configuration A sample VLAN ID/EVC Map is suggested. Variables augment it.

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1

Bandwidth Profile

Per Ingress UNI UNI Bandwidth Profile Parameters UNI A CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A Note 1 : (0 < CIR A UNI Speed), (CBS A maximum Service Frame size)

Service Performance

CoS Identifier 1

EVC Performance Service Attributes Frame Delay (FD) Performance Frame Delay Variation (FDV) Performance Frame Loss Ratio (FLR) Performance

Performance Objectives FD 1 FDV 1 FLR 1

Test Procedure Units Variables Results Remarks

Succinct description of the test procedure. CE-VLAN ID/EVC Maps are provided for all tests. Units can be time units, rates and counts in integers such as milliseconds, frames per second and numbers of valid frames. For the most part units used are defined in RFCs 2285, 2544, 2889. Variables such as number of UNIs, EVCs and CE-VLAN IDs and frame formats and lengths MUST be described. Description of the textual, numerical and/or graphical format in which to display test results. Results can be Pass or Fail. Description of any particular observations that might effect the test result

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 9

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

8. Abstract Test Cases for EVC Related Performance Service Attributes

In this section we assume familiarity with the MEF 10 Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1 [1] and, in particular, its section 6.7 which defines EVC Related Performance Service Attributes. Abstract Test Cases based on the EVC Related Performance Service Attributes described in the MEF 10 [1] are defined. There are three Test Cases defined in this section. Test Case 1: Frame Delay Service Performance Test Case 2: Frame Delay Variation Service Performance Test Case 3: Frame Loss Ratio Service Performance

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 10

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 1: Frame Delay Service Performance

ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration

Frame Delay Service Performance M.6.7.1 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory For all Service Frames declared Green and associated with a particular Class of Service Identifier on a Point-to-Point EVC that arrive at the UNI during a time interval T, Frame Delay Performance MUST be less than or equal to the Frame Delay Performance Objective Verify that for all Service Frames declared Green and associated with a particular Class of Service Identifier on a Point-to-Point EVC that arrive at the UNI during a time interval T, Frame Delay Performance is less than or equal to the Frame Delay Performance Objective At least one EVC associating at least two UNIs is configured and at least one Bandwidth Profile with CIR > 0 is associated with at least one of the UNIs. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs
INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1.

Per Ingress UNI

Bandwidth Profile

UNI Bandwidth Profile Parameters UNI A CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A Note 1 : (0 < CIR A UNI Speed), (CBS A maximum Service Frame size)

CoS Identifier

EVC Performance Service Attributes Frame Delay (FD) Performance

Performance Objectives FD 1

Service Performance

Test Procedure Units Variables Results Remarks

Tester offers Service Frames at the ingress UNI into the configured EVCs and measures Frame Delay as the time elapsed from the reception of the first bit of the ingress Service Frame declared Green until the transmission of the last bit of the Service Frame at the egress UNI. Frame Delay Performance is then calculated for a time interval T, as the P-Percentile of the Frame Delay for all Service Frames successfully delivered between the UNI pairs. Service Frames may be offered at an average rate up to CIR A Time units Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR A, CBS A , EIR A, EBS A,, UNIs interface Speed, number of EVCs per UNI, number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, number and values of CoS ID, time interval T, Performance Objective FD 1 Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 11

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 2: Frame Delay Variation Service Performance

ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Frame Delay Variation Service Performance M.6.7.3 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory For all Service Frames declared Green and associated with a particular Class of Service Identifier on a Point-to-Point EVC that arrive at the UNI during a time interval T, Frame Delay Variation Performance MUST be less than or equal to the Frame Delay Variation Performance Objective Verify that for all Service Frames declared Green and associated with a particular Class of Service Identifier on a Point-to-Point EVC that arrive at the UNI during a time interval T, Frame Delay Variation Performance is less than or equal to the Frame Delay Variation Performance Objective At least one EVC associating at least two UNIs is configured and at least one Bandwidth Profile with CIR > 0 is associated with at least one of the UNIs. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1.

Per Ingress UNI

Bandwidth Profile

UNI Bandwidth Profile Parameters UNI A CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A Note 1 : (0 < CIR A UNI Speed), (CBS A maximum Service Frame size)

CoS Identifier

EVC Performance Service Attributes Frame Delay Variation (FDV) Performance

Performance Objectives FDV 1

Service Performance

Tester offers Service Frames at the ingress UNI into the configured EVCs and measures Frame Delay Variation as the variation in the Frame Delay between a pair of Green Service Frames. Frame Delay Variation Performance is then calculated for a time interval T, as the P-Percentile of the difference between the frame delays of a Service Frame pair that satisfies the following two characteristics:

Test Procedure
1. 2. The two Service Frames that comprise the pair arrive at the ingress UNI within the time interval T The two Service Frames that comprise the pair arrive at the ingress UNI exactly t time units apart

Units Variables Results Remarks

Service Frames may be offered at an average rate up to CIR A Time units Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR A, CBS A , EIR A, EBS A,, UNIs interface Speed, number of EVCs per UNI, number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, number and values of CoS ID, time interval T, Performance Objective FDV 1 Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 12

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 3: Frame Loss Ratio Service Performance

ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Frame Loss Ratio Service Performance M.6.7.5 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory For all Service Frames declared Green and associated with a particular Class of Service Identifier on a Point-to-Point EVC that arrive at the UNI during a time interval T, Frame Loss Ratio Performance MUST be less than or equal to the Frame Loss Ratio Performance Objective Verify that for all Service Frames declared Green and associated with a particular Class of Service Identifier on a Point-to-Point EVC that arrive at the UNI during a time interval T, Frame Loss Ratio Performance is less than or equal to the Frame Loss Ratio Performance Objective At least one EVC associating at least two UNIs is configured and at least one Bandwidth Profile with CIR > 0 is associated with at least one of the UNIs. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1.

Per Ingress UNI

Bandwidth Profile

UNI Bandwidth Profile Parameters UNI A CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A Note 1 : (0 < CIR A UNI Speed), (CBS A maximum Service Frame size)

CoS Identifier

EVC Performance Service Attributes

Performance Objectives FLR 1

Service Performance

Frame Loss Ratio (FLR) Performance

Test Procedure Units Variables Results Remarks

Tester offers Service Frames at the ingress UNI into the configured EVCs and over a time interval T counts the number of Service Frames declared Green at the ingress UNI and successfully received at the egress UNI. Frame Loss Ratio Performance is then calculated as the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the number of Service Frames declared Green not delivered at the egress UNI divided by the total number of such Service Frames. Service Frames may be offered at an average rate up to CIR A Number of Service Frames Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR A, CBS A , EIR A, EBS A,, UNIs interface Speed, number of EVCs per UNI, number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, number and values of CoS ID, time interval T, Performance Objective FLR 1 Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 13

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

9. Abstract Test Cases for Bandwidth Profiles Service Attributes

In this section we again assume familiarity with the MEF 10 [1] and, in particular, its section 7.10 which defines Bandwidth Profiles Service Attributes. Abstract Test Cases based on Bandwidth Profiles Service Attributes described in the MEF 10 [1] are defined. There are seven Test Cases defined in this section.

Test Case 4: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR > 0 and EIR = 0 Test Case 5: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR = 0 and EIR > 0 Test Case 6: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR > 0 and EIR > 0 Test Case 7: Bandwidth Profile per Ingress UNI Test Case 8: Bandwidth Profile per EVC Test Case 9: Bandwidth Profile per Class of Service Test Case 10: Multiple Bandwidth Profiles at the UNI

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 14

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 4: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR > 0 and EIR = 0
ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR > 0 and EIR = 0 M.7.10.2.1-2 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory When a Bandwidth Profile is associated with a UNI, with a CIR > 0 and an EIR = 0, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI MUST NOT exceed the amount of traffic accepted as Green (W G ) at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, provided that the ingress traffic is greater than W G Verify that when a Bandwidth Profile is associated with a UNI, with a CIR > 0 and an EIR = 0, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI does not exceed the amount of traffic accepted as Green (W G ) at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, provided that the ingress traffic is greater than W G At least one EVC associating at least two UNIs is configured and at least one Bandwidth Profile is applied at the UNI. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1

Per Ingress UNI

Bandwidth Profile

UNI Bandwidth Profile Parameters UNI A CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A Note 1 : (0 < CIR A < UNI Speed), (CBS A maximum Service Frame size) Note 2 : (EIR A = 0) and (EBS A = 0)

Service Performance

Not Specified Tester offers Service Frames of length at an average rate greater than CIR A to the ingress UNI during a time interval T and measures the number of Service Frames delivered at the egress UNI. The amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must not exceed W G where: W G is the amount of traffic accepted as Green over the time interval T that should be delivered to the egress UNI Number of valid Service Frames Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR A, CBS A , UNIs interface speed, number of UNIs, number of EVCs per UNI, type of EVC (Point-to-Point and Multipoint-to-Multipoint), number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, time interval T, number and length of the offered Service Frames Pass or fail

Test Procedure

Units Variables Results Remarks

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 15

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 5: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR = 0 and EIR > 0
ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR = 0 and EIR > 0 M.7.10.2.1-2 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory When a Bandwidth Profile is associated with a UNI, with a CIR = 0 and an EIR > 0, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI MUST NOT exceed the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow (W Y ) at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, provided that the ingress traffic is greater than W Y Verify that when a Bandwidth Profile is associated with a UNI, with a CIR = 0 and an EIR > 0, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI does not exceed the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow (W Y ) at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, provided that the ingress traffic is greater than W Y At least one EVC associating at least two UNIs is configured and at least one Bandwidth Profile is applied at the UNI. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1

Per Ingress UNI

Bandwidth Profile

UNI Bandwidth Profile Parameters UNI A CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A Note 1 : (CIR A = 0) and (CBS A = 0) Note 2 : (0 < EIR A < UNI Speed), (EBS A maximum Service Frame size)

Service Performance

Not Specified

Test Procedure

Tester offers Service Frames of length at an average rate greater than EIR A to the ingress UNI during a time interval T and measures the number of Service Frames delivered at the egress UNI. The amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must not exceed W Y where: W Y is the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow over the time interval T that may be delivered to the egress UNI

Units Variables Results Remarks

Number of valid Service Frames Bandwidth Profile Parameters EIR A, EBS A , UNIs interface speed, number of UNIs, number of EVCs per UNI, type of EVC (Point-to-Point and Multipoint-to-Multipoint), number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, time interval T, number and length of the offered Service Frames Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 16

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 6: Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR > 0 and EIR > 0
ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Bandwidth Profile Rate Enforcement when CIR > 0 and EIR > 0 M.7.10.2.1-2 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory When a Bandwidth Profile is associated with a UNI, with a CIR > 0 and an EIR > 0, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI MUST NOT exceed the amount of traffic accepted as Green (W G ) plus the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow (W y ) at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, provided that the ingress traffic is greater than (W G + W y ) Verify that when a Bandwidth Profile is associated with a UNI, with a CIR > 0 and an EIR > 0, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI does not exceed the amount of traffic accepted as Green (W G ) plus the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow (W y ) at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, provided that the ingress traffic is greater than (W G + W y ) At least one EVC associating at least two UNIs is configured and at least one Bandwidth Profile is applied at the UNI. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1

Per Ingress UNI

Bandwidth Profile

UNI Bandwidth Profile Parameters UNI A CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A Note 1 : (0 < CIR A < UNI Speed), (CBS A maximum Service Frame size) Note 2 : (0 < EIR A < UNI Speed), (EBS A maximum Service Frame size) Note 3 : (CIR A + EIR A < UNI Speed) Not Specified Tester offers Service Frames of length at an average rate greater than CIR A + EIR A to the ingress UNI during a time interval T and measures the number of Service Frames delivered at the egress UNI. The amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must not exceed (W G + W y ) where:

Service Performance

Test Procedure

W G is the amount of traffic accepted as Green over the time interval T that should be delivered to the egress UNI W Y is the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow over the time interval T that may be delivered to the egress UNI

Units Variables Results Remarks

Number of valid Service Frames Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR A, CBS A , EIR A, EBS A, UNIs interface speed, number of UNIs, number of EVCs per UNI, type of EVC (Point-to-Point and Multipoint-to-Multipoint), number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, time interval T, number and length of the offered Service Frames Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 17

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 7: Bandwidth Profile per Ingress UNI

ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Bandwidth Profile per Ingress UNI M.7.10.3 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory When a per Ingress UNI Bandwidth Profile is associated with a UNI, the Bandwidth Profile MUST be applied to all ingress Service Frames at that UNI Verify that when a per Ingress UNI Bandwidth Profile is associated with a UNI, the Bandwidth Profile is applied to all ingress Service Frames at that UNI At least two EVCs associating at least two UNIs are configured such that each associated UNI is in at least two EVCs and at least one CE-VLAN ID is mapped per EVC. A per Ingress UNI Bandwidth Profile is associated with at least one of the UNIs. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 12 EVC 2 12 EVC 2 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1

Per Ingress UNI

Bandwidth Profile

UNI UNI A

Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR A CBS A EIR A EBS A

Note 1 : (0 < CIR A < UNI Speed), (CBS A maximum Service Frame size)

Service Performance

Not Specified Tester offers Service Frames of length into the configured EVCs at the ingress UNI and verifies that over a time interval T at least one Service Frame from each of the EVCs is delivered at the associated egress UNIs. Service Frames are offered at equal average rates into each of the configured EVCs at the ingress UNI, at an aggregate average rate greater than the CIR A. Tester also verifies that the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI does not exceed (W G + W Y ) where: W G is the amount of traffic accepted as Green over the time interval T that should be delivered to the egress UNI W Y is the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow over the time interval T that may be delivered to the egress UNI

Test Procedure

Units Variables Results Remarks

Number of valid Service Frames Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR A, CBS A, EIR A, EBS A , UNIs interface speed, number of UNIs, number of EVCs per UNI, type of EVC (Point-to-Point and Multipoint-to-Multipoint), number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, time interval T, number and length of the offered Service Frames Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 18

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 8: Bandwidth Profile per EVC

ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Bandwidth Profile per EVC M.7.10.4 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory When a UNI is associated with a per EVC Bandwidth Profile, the Bandwidth Profile MUST be applied to all ingress Service Frames at the UNI on that EVC Verify that when a UNI is associated with a per EVC Bandwidth Profile, the Bandwidth Profile is applied to all ingress Service Frames at the UNI on that EVC At least two EVCs associating at least two UNIs are configured such that each associated UNI is in at least two of the same EVCs and at least one CE-VLAN ID is mapped per EVC. A per EVC Bandwidth Profile is associated with at least one of the UNIs. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 12 EVC 2 12 EVC 2 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1

Per EVC EVC Bandwidth Profile Parameters EVC 1 CIR 1 CBS 1 EIR 1 EBS 1 EVC 2 CIR 2 CBS 2 EIR 2 EBS 2 Note 1 : (CIR 1 = 0), (CBS 1 = 0) and (EIR 1 = 0) and (EBS 1 = 0) Note 2 : (0 < CIR 2 < UNI Speed), (CBS 2 maximum Service Frame size) Note 3 : (CIR < UNI Speed)

Bandwidth Profile

Service Performance

Not Specified Tester offers Service Frames of length into the configured EVCs at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, at an aggregate average rate in excess of the sum of the CIRs of all the configured EVCs and measures the number of Service Frames delivered at the egress UNI. For EVC 1 , the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must be 0 and for every other configured EVC, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must not exceed (W G + W Y ) where: W G is the amount of traffic accepted as Green over the time interval T that should be delivered to the egress UNI W Y is the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow over the time interval T that may be delivered to the egress UNI

Test Procedure

Units Variables Results Remarks

Number of valid Service Frames Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR 2, CBS 2, EIR 2, EBS 2, UNIs interface speed, number of UNIs, number of EVCs per UNI, type of EVC (Point-to-Point and Multipoint-to-Multipoint), number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, time interval T, number and length of the offered Service Frames Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 19

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 9: Bandwidth Profile per Class of Service

ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Bandwidth Profile per Class of Service M.7.10.5 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Mandatory When a UNI is associated with a per Class of Service Bandwidth Profile, the Bandwidth Profile MUST be applied to all ingress Service Frames at the UNI with that specific Class of Service Identifier Verify that when a UNI is associated with a per Class of Service Bandwidth Profile, the Bandwidth Profile is applied to all ingress Service Frames at the UNI with that specific Class of Service Identifier At least one EVC associating at least two UNIs is configured and at least one CE-VLAN ID is mapped per EVC. A per Class of Service Bandwidth Profile is associated with at least one of the UNIs. At least two CoS Identifiers are used to identify the Class of Service applicable to the Service Frames offered at the UNI. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1

Per Class of Service CoS IdenCE-VLAN EVC Bandwidth Profile Parameters tifier CoS 1 1 CIR 11 CBS 11 EIR 11 EBS 11 EVC 1 2 7 CIR 12 CBS 12 EIR 12 EBS 12 Note 1 : (CIR 11 = 0), (CBS 11 = 0) and (EIR 11 = 0) and (EBS 11 = 0) Note 2 : (0 < CIR 12 < UNI Speed), (CBS 12 maximum Service Frame size) Note 3 : (CIR < UNI Speed)

Bandwidth Profile

Service Performance

Not Specified Tester offers Service Frames of length into the configured EVCs at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, at an aggregate average rate in excess of the sum of the CIRs of all the configured CoS IDs and measures the number of Service Frames delivered at the egress UNI. For CoS ID 1, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must be 0 and for every other configured CoS ID, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must not exceed (W G + W Y ) where: W G is the amount of traffic accepted as Green over the time interval T that should be delivered to the egress UNI W Y is the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow over the time interval T that may be delivered to the egress UNI

Test Procedure

Units Variables Results Remarks

Number of valid Service Frames Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR 12, CBS 12, EIR 12, EBS 12, UNIs interface Speed, number of UNIs, number of EVCs per UNI, number of CoS Identifiers per EVC, type of EVC (Point-to-Point and Multipoint-to-Multipoint), number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, number and values of CE-VLAN CoS, time interval T, number and length of the offered Service Frames Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 20

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

Test Case 10: Multiple Bandwidth Profiles at the UNI

ABSTRACT TEST SUITE FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: PHASE 1 Test Name Test Definition ID Reference Document Test Type Test Status Requirement Description Test Object Test Configuration
Multiple Bandwidth Profiles at the UNI M.7.10.6 MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] Conformance Optional Multiple models of Bandwidth Profile application MAY exist simultaneously at the UNI Verify that multiple models of Bandwidth Profile application can exist simultaneously at the UNI At least two EVCs associating at least two UNIs are configured such that each associated UNI is in at least two of the same EVCs and at least one CE-VLAN ID is mapped per EVC. A per EVC Bandwidth Profile and a per Class of Service Bandwidth Profile are associated with at least one of the UNIs. Testers are attached to all UNIs in the configured EVCs INGRESS UNI A EGRESS UNI B

VLAN-ID/EVC Map

CE-VLAN ID EVC CE-VLAN ID EVC 10 EVC 1 10 EVC 1 12 EVC 2 12 EVC 2 Use of other CE-VLAN IDs is permitted provided that configuration of the CE-VLAN IDs conforms to MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1], Section 7.5.1 Per EVC EVC Bandwidth Profile Parameters EVC 1 CIR 1 CBS 1 EIR 1 EBS 1 Note 1 : (0 < CIR 1 < UNI Speed), (CBS 1 maximum Service Frame size)

Bandwidth Profile

Per Class of Service CoS IdenCE-VLAN EVC Bandwidth Profile Parameters tifier CoS 1 1 CIR 21 CBS 21 EIR 21 EBS 21 EVC 2 2 7 CIR 22 CBS 22 EIR 22 EBS 22 Note 2 : (CIR 21 = 0), (CBS 21 = 0) and (EIR 21 = 0), (EBS 21 = 0) Note 3 : (0 < CIR 22 < UNI Speed), (CBS 22 maximum Service Frame size) Note 4 : (CIR < UNI Speed) Not Specified Tester offers Service Frames of length into the configured EVCs at the ingress UNI during a time interval T, at an aggregate average rate in excess of the sum of the CIRs of all the configured EVCs and CoS IDs and measures the number of Service Frames delivered at the egress UNI. For CoS ID 1, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must be 0 and for every other configured EVC and CoS ID, the amount of traffic delivered at the egress UNI must not exceed (W G + W Y ) where: W G is the amount of traffic accepted as Green over the time interval T that should be delivered to the egress UNI W Y is the amount of traffic accepted as Yellow over the time interval T that may be delivered to the egress UNI

Service Performance

Test Procedure

Units Variables Results Remarks

Number of valid Service Frames Bandwidth Profile Parameters CIR 1, CBS 1, EIR 1, EBS 1, CIR 22, CBS 22, EIR 22, EBS 22, UNIs interface Speed, number of UNIs, number of EVCs per UNI, number of CoS Identifiers per EVC, type of EVC (Point-to-Point and Multipoint-toMultipoint), number and values of CE-VLAN IDs, number and values of CE-VLAN CoS, time interval T, number and length of the offered Service Frames Pass or fail

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 21

Abstract Test Suite for Traffic Management Phase 1

10. References
Reference Reference Details

[1] Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1 [2] Services Definitions [3] Abstract Test Suite for Ethernet Services at the UNI

MEF 10 [Ethernet Services Attributes Phase 1] MEF 6 [Ethernet Services Definitions] MEF 9 [Abstract Test Suite for Ethernet Services at the UNI] Information technology Telecommunications and information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area networks Specific requirements Part 3: Carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) access method and physical layer specifications, 8 March 2002. (Normative) RFC 2119, Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels, S. Bradner, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt (Normative) RFC 2285, Benchmarking Terminology for LAN Switching Devices, R. Mandeville, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2285.txt RFC 2544, Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices, S. Bradner, J. McQuaid, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2544.txt RFC 2889, Benchmarking Methodology for LAN Switching Devices, R. Mandeville, J. Perser, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2889.txt

[4] IEEE 802.3 2002

[5] RFC 2119 [6] RFC 2285 [7] RFC 2544 [8] RFC 2889

MEF 14

The Metro Ethernet Forum 2005. Any reproduction of this document, or any portion thereof, shall contain the following statement: "Reproduced with permission of the Metro Ethernet Forum." No user of this document is authorized to modify any of the information contained herein.

Page 22