Assignment - 2, Report
Assignment - 2, Report
DISASTER
MANAGEMENT
21ART-427
Submitted By-
Bhuvnesh Sharma
Kainaat Abedi
UID: 21BAr1037
21BAR1041
Semester 7th
SEISMIC RETROFITTING TECHNIQUES FOR BUILDINGS
Seismic retrofitting refers to the process of strengthening and upgrading existing buildings and
structures to improve their resistance to seismic forces. The primary goal of retrofitting is to
enhance the structural performance of a building during an earthquake, thereby reducing the risk
of damage or collapse. This process involves various techniques designed to mitigate the effects of
seismic activity on structures that were not originally built to withstand such forces.
Enhancing Safety
Minimizing Economic Loss
Preserving Historical and Cultural Heritage
Ensuring Compliance with Modern Building Codes
Supporting Community Resilience
Public safety only: The goal is to protect human life, ensuring that the structure will not collapse
upon its occupants or passersby, and that the structure can be safely exited. Under severe
seismic conditions the structure may be a total economic write-off, requiring tear-down and
replacement.
Structure survivability: The goal is that the structure, while remaining safe for exit, may require
extensive repair (but not replacement) before it is generally useful or considered safe for
occupation. This is typically the lowest level of retrofit applied to bridges.
Structure unaffected: This level of retrofit is preferred for historic structures of high cultural
significance.
NEED OF RETROFITTING IN EXISTING EARTHQUAKE VULNERABLE BUILDINGS
Buildings have been designed according to a seismic code, but the code has been upgraded in
later years;
Buildings designed to meet the modern seismic codes, but deficiencies exist in the design
and/or construction;
Essential buildings must be strengthened like hospitals, historical monuments and architectural
buildings;
Important buildings whose services are assumed to be essential just after an earthquake like
hospitals;
Effectiveness of each methods varies a lot depending upon parameters like type of structures,
material condition, amount of damage, etc.
Under minor but frequent shaking, the main members of the building that carry vertical and
horizontal forces should not be damaged; however building parts that do not carry load may
sustain repairable damage;
Under moderate but occasional shaking, the main members may sustain repairable damage,
while the other parts of the building may be damaged such that they may even have to be
replaced after the earthquake; and
Under strong but rare shaking, the main members may sustain severe (even irreparable)
damage, but the building should not collapse.
EARTHQUAKE DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
RETROFITTING TECHNIQUES
GLOBAL LOCAL
MASS REDUCTION
BASE ISOLATION
MASS DAMPERS
BEAM JACKETING
COLUMN JACKETING
Studies have shown that externally bonded FRP composites can be applied to various
structural members including columns, beams, slabs, and walls to improve their structural
performance such as stiffness, load carrying capacity, and ductility.
3-D Model of a Building Wall Stresses before After installation of Additional FRP
Retrofitting Steel Window Retrofitting
frames
It is the most powerful tool for passive structural vibration control technique
Significantly Increase the Period of the Structure and the Damping so that the Response is
Significantly Reduced
ELASTOMERIC ISOLATORS
The structure is supported by bearing pads that have curved surface and low friction.
During an earthquake, the building is free to slide on the bearings.
These are specially designed base isolators which works on the principle of simple pendulum.
It increases the natural time period of oscillation by causing the structure to slide along the
concave inner surface through the frictional interface.
Typically, bearings measure 3 feet in dia., 8 inches in height and weight being 2000 pounds
Benicia Martinez Bridge, California is one of the largest bridges to date to undertake a
seismic isolation retrofit.
Largest seismic isolation bearings, measuring 13 feet in diameter, and weighing 40,000
pounds. They have a lateral displacement capacity of 53 inches, a 5 million pound design
dead plus live load, and a 5 second period.
Bearing used in Benicia Martinez Bridge (left) and Benicia Martinez Bridge (right)
Comparison Stresses in Z direction for Fixed Base (left) and Isolated Base (right)
Comparison of Shear Stresses in Y-Z direction for Fixed Base(left) and Isolated base (right)
ADVANTAGES OF BASE ISOLATION
Expensive
Cannot be applied partially to structures unlike other retrofitting
Challenging to implement in an efficient manner
Allowance for building displacements
Inefficient for high rise buildings
Not suitable for buildings rested on soft soil.
SEISMIC DAMPERS
Seismic Dampers are used in place of structural elements, LIke diagonal braces, for controlling
seismic damage in structures.
It partly absorbs the seismic energy and reduces the motion of buildings.
Types:-
Viscous Dampers (energy is absorbed by silicone-based fluid passing between piston-cylinder
arrangement),
Friction Dampers (energy is absorbed by surfaces with friction between them rubbing against
each other), and
Yielding Dampers (energy is absorbed by metallic components that yield).
IS: 1893-2002 (part-1) Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (Part 1: General
Provision and Buildings) - Code of Practice
IS: 4326-1993 Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of Buildings - Code of Practice
IS: 13920-1993 Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to Seismic Forces
Code of Practice
IS: 13935-1993 Repair and Seismic Strengthening of Buildings - Guidelines
IS: 13828-1993 Improving Earthquake Resistance of Low Strength Masonary Buildings - Guidelines
IS: 13827-1993 Improving Earthquake Resistance of Earthen Buildings - Guidelines
CONCLUSION
REFRENCES
Agarwal, P. and Shrikhande, M., 2006, Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, 2nd Edition,
Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.
Cardone, D. and Dolce, M., 2003, Seismic Protection of Light Secondary Systems through Different
Base Isolation Systems, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7 (2), 223-250.
Constantinou, M.C., Symans, M.D., Tsopelas, P., and Taylor, D.P., 1993, Fluid Viscous Dampers in
Applications of Seismic Energy Dissipation and Seismic Isolation, ATC-17-1, Applied Technology
Council, San Francisco.
EERI, 1999, Lessons Learnt Over Time Learning from Earthquakes Series: Volume II Innovative
Recovery in India, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland (CA), USA.