0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views18 pages

LABREPORT219

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 18

ANALYSIS OF WASTEWATER

Arias, Julia Lourdette; Borja, Patrice Camille; Derecho, Mae Ann

ABSTRACT The significance of monitoring physicochemical parameters in laboratory wastewater had


been a constant concern for the university over the years. The sets of experiments were carried out to
analyze ammonia, phosphate and nitrite content using colorimetric methods. The results showed that the
concentrations for each are relatively low.

Water is an extremely essential using spectrophotometric method. It is expected


substance for all living organisms. The quality that the data from such analyses will provide an
of water is a vital concern for mankind as it is insight to future actions which might be taken by
related to human and environmental welfare. the university.
Wastewater, especially, is subject to numerous
pathogenic microorganisms and high content of METHODOLOGY
organic matter as well as inorganic pollutants
such as heavy metals. Disposal then of untreated Ammonia analysis by phenate colorimetric
or failed treatments to waste into the method. Wastewater sample from the Physical
environment will endanger all life forms at the Chemistry Laboratory was collected using
long run. Thus, it is of importance to monitor the 500-mL polyethylene bottle and refrigerated
physicochemical parameters in order to produce prior to analysis. Analysis of ammonia in the
the correct assessment of its potential to affect sample was performed using the
organisms and also to provide further treatments spectrophotometric phenate method . Ten
needed before discharge to the environment. milliliters each of the sample was pipetted out to
Among such parameters analyzed are six different test tubes for replication. A drop
nitrite, phosphorus content and ammonia. (0.05 mL) of manganese sulfate solution,
Nitrogen and phosphorus are both components MnSO​4​, was added to each test tube containing
critical nutrient in the metabolism of all forms of the sample. The test tubes were then shaken with
life. However, it is known that increase in such the addition of 0.50 mL hypochlorous reagent
parameters also induce harm to the aquatic and continuously done after the immediate
environment. In the case of nitrites and addition of 0.60 mL phenate reagent. Vigorous
phosphorus, over-nutrient leads to high algal shaking was observed at this period of the
growth and thus causes deprivation of oxygen to method. After 10 minutes, the absorbance of the
other life forms. Hence, a competition forms six samples were read using a UV-Vis Double
with other living organisms which leads to Beam Spectrophotometer at 630 nm.The color
eventual death of the flora and fauna around and formation is stable for at least 24 hours.
on the area (eutrophication). Ammonia on the A stock solution was prepared using
other hand, becomes toxic once it exceeds the pre-dried NH​4​Cl diluted to 250-mL. A working
natural concentrations. standard was taken from this stock solution and
With the number and varied experiments was then used to prepare a series of 5 standard
conducted in laboratories and non-observance of solutions of 50-mL each which covers the
proper waste management at times practiced by expected concentration range of the sample. The
students, the quality of wastewater had been a standard solutions along with the solutions for
constant concern of University of San Carlos. In recovery were treated as that of the samples.
this paper, a set of experiments which utilizes
the indicators of water quality i.e pH, NO2​-​, Phosphate analysis by direct ascorbic acid
NH​3​, and P levels, of wastewater from the colorimetric method. Into a 125-ml Erlenmeyer
Physical Chemistry laboratory were determined flask, 50.0 ml of the water sample was pipetted
out and added with a drop of phenolphthalein Table 1. The pH of the sample was taken
indicator. If a red coloration develops 5N of beforehand and was determined to be 8.13.
sulfuric acid was added dropwise to discharge Calibration curves and calculations are given as
the color. Then, 8.00 ml of the combined reagent supplementary materials.
was added and mixed thoroughly. Absorbance Analysis of ammonia for the wastewater
was measured in a span of 30mins, after samples was done using the phenate colorimetric
allowing the solution to react for 10 minutes. method. In this method, ammonia (NH​3​) reacts
Recovery test and quality control of the sample with a hypochlorite to produce monochloramine.
were also measured at the end of sample It is further reacted with phenate and sodium
analysis. hypochlorite in the which gives the intensely
blue compound, indophenol (Park et al., 2009).
Nitrite analysis by NED colorimetric method. Using the equation calculated from the
Wastewater sample was collected on January 20, calibration graph, the sample concentration was
2017 at 10:30 in the morning from Phychem lab. found to have an average concentration of
Prior to this, stock nitrite (NO​2​-​) solution was 3.62E-2 ± 8.47E-4 ppm NH​3​. The percent
prepared and standardized using standardized recovery was determined to be 85%. The
potassium permanganate (KMnO​4​) solution and wastewater was from a laboratory which has not
sodium oxalate (Na​2​C​2​O​4​). A color reagent was utilized ammonia water recently and thus there
also prepared beforehand and stored in a dark is no expected increase in its levels.
bottle inside the refrigerator. Through the entire There are three possible ways to
procedure, a determine the phosphate content of a water
water blank was carried and necessary sample, the one identified and performed in this
corrections were made. experiment is the direct ascorbic acid
The pH of the water sample was colorimetric method for phosphates. It follows
checked immediately. It was ensured to be in the the principle of reacting the ammonium
range of pH 5-9. Fifty mL of the clear sample molybdate and potassium antimonyl tartrate
was quantitatively transferred to a 100-mL solution in the acidic medium of the diluted
beaker and 2-mL of the color reagent was then sample solutions of orthophosphate to form the
added. The absorbance was read after 10 intensely colored antimonyl phospho- molybdate
minutes but before 2 hours at 543 nm using complex. The observed coloration is
Milton Roy Spectronic 20. proportional to the phosphate concentration.
From the stock NaNO​2 solution, 1.018 x The concentration of phosphate present
10​-3 mg/mL solution was prepared. From this in the water samples were calculated to be equal
new stock solution, a ​series of standards were to 0.01744 mg P L​-1 and 0.01730 mg P L​−1 at the
prepared into 50-mL volumetric flasks and average absorbance of 0.126 and 0.125,
diluted to the mark with deionized water. respectively (refer to Table 1); with a percent
Two-mL of color reagent were added to each recovery equal to 90%. From the data calculated,
and allowed to equilibrate for more than 10 the method used to determine the amount of
minutes before reading. phosphate that is present in the wastewater is
Recovery was done to the samples by suitable for the kind of sample analyzed. This is
adding a known amount of standard and treating in accordance to the Standard Methods for the
the solution with color reagent. Examination of Water and Wastewater that
referred ascorbic acid as a method of
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION determination used for samples containing
phosphates at a range of 0.01 to 6 mg P/L.
Results of wastewater analysis for The average concentration of the sample
ammonia, phosphate and nitrite using is 6.329 x 10​-5 ​mg N/L and the computed percent
spectrophotometric method is summarized in recovery was determined to be 118.75%.
Relative to others, nitrite concentration is
extremely low as can be shown in figure 1. This
is suggested to be due to lack of experiments
performed on the sampling day.
The low levels of these chemical
indicators are to be expected with the kind of
wastewater sampled. Most chemicals, if deemed
too high, pollutes the environment. These would
commonly come from municipal or domestic
discharges.
Figure 1. Wastewater analysis graph
showing ammonia (violet), phosphate (brown)
and nitrite (green) concentrations relative to
each other.
Table 1. Summary of results from spectrophotometric analysis of wastewater

Ammonia Phosphate Nitrite

(mg NH​3​/ L) ( mg P/ L) (mg NO​2​—​N/ L)

Trial 1 0.03712 0.01744 6.269 E-5

Trial 2 0.03566 0.0173 6.39E-05

Trial 3 0.03520 0.01744 6.51E-05

Trial 4 0.03566 0.01744 6.27E-05

Trial 5 0.03728 0.01744 6.27E-05

Trial 6 0.06504 0.01744 6.27E-05

%Recovery 85% 90% 118.75%

Average 3.6163 E-2 1.7417 E-2 6.3412 E-5

standard
deviation 8.4681 E-4 5.7155 E-5 1.0772 E-6

CONCLUSION

The analysis of inorganic components in the is still highly suggested that environmental
wastewater sample from Physical Chemistry safety should be kept through proper waste
laboratory did not show any alarming results management especially involving chemicals.
which may need immediate action. However, it
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

I. Ammonia

a. Methodology

Reagents

● Ammonia-free water
● Hypochlorous acid reagent- add 10 mL 5% NaOCl solution (commercial bleach) to 40 mL
ammonia-free water. Adjust pH to 6.5-7.0
● Manganese sulfate solution- dissolve 25 mg MnSO​4​.5 H​2​O in 50 mL ammonia-free water
● Phenate reagent- dissolve 1.25 g NaOH and 5g phenol in 50 mL ammonia-free water. Prepare
weekly because this darkens on standing
● Stock ammonium solution - dissolve 381.9 mg anhydrous NH​4​Cl dried at 100​o​C in water and
dilute to 1-L volumetric flask
● Standard ammonium solution- Dilute 1.00 mL of stock ammonium solution to 250-mL
volumetric flask with ammonia-free water.

b. Calibration curve

Figure 2. Calibration curve for ammonia analysis

c. Wastewater sample data


Absorbance Concentration (ppm)

0.069 0.03712

0.050 0.03566

0.044 0.03520

0.050 0.03566
0.071 0.03728

0.055 0.06504

II. Phosphate

a. Methodology

Reagents
● Phenolphthalein indicator
● 1N NaOH
● Potassium antimonyl tartrate solution
● Ammonium molybdate solution
● 0.01 M Ascorbic Acid
● Standard Phosphate solution

In a 500ml volumetric flask, 1.3715g of potassium antimonyl tartrate solid was dissolved in 400 ml
distilled water and diluted to the mark.
In another 500 ml glass stoppered volumetric flask, 20 g of ammonium molybdate solids were dissolved
in distilled water, mixed thoroughly and diluted to the mark.
For the ascorbic acid solution (0.01 M), 1.76g of ascorbic acid solid was dissolved in 100 ml and stored in
a glass stoppered bottle.
The following proportions of 50ml 5N sulfuric acid, 5ml potassium antimonyl tartrate solution, 15ml
ammonium molybdate solution and 30 ml ascorbic acid were combined and mixed thoroughly forming
100 ml of the combined reagent used for the analysis of phosphate in water. The stability of the reagent is
only for 4hrs hence the solutions were combined prior to the analysis.
Standard phosphate solution was prepared through dissolving 219.5 mg of anhydrous KH​2​PO​4 and diluted
to 1000ml [1.00ml = 50.00 µg PO​4​2−​—P].
b. Calibration curve

Figure 3. Calibration curve for phosphate analysis


c. Wastewater sample data

Absorbance Concentration (ppm)

0.126 0.01744

0.125 0.01730

0.126 0.01744

0.126 0.01744

0.126 0.01744

0.126 0.01744

III. Nitrite

a. Methodology
Potassium permanganate (0.05 N) was standardized using anhydrous sodium oxalate. About 100-120 mg
of Na​2​C​2​O​4 ​was dissolved in 100 mL water, added with 10 mL of 1+1 H​2​SO​4 ​and heated to 90-95 deg. C.
This solution was titrated with KMnO​4 to a slightly pink endpoint that persisted for at least a minute.
0.025 M Na​2​C​2​O​4 was
​ standardized using volume ratio with KMnO​4.

Sodium nitrite stock solution was prepared by dissolving 0.6196 g commercial reagent grade NaNO​2 in
deionized water in a 500 mL volumetric flask. For the standardization, the following procedures were
followed: Pipet in order 50.00 mL standardized 0.05 N KMnO​4 solution, 5.00 mL concentrated sulfuric
acid and 50.00 mL stock nitrite solution. The solution was warmed gently on a hot plate while titrated
with .025M Na​2​C​2​O​4 to colorless. The excess oxalate was titrated with 0.05 M KMnO​4 to the faint pink
endpoint. A water blank was carried through the procedure.

The concentration of NO​2​—​N was calculated using the equation below:


(BxC)−(DxE)x 7
A= F

where:

A= [NO​2​—​N] in stock nitrite solution, mg/mL


B= total volume of standard KMnO​4​ solution used, mL
C= KMnO​4 ​standard solution used, N
D= total volume standard Na​2​C​2​O​4 solution​
​ used,
​ mL
E= Na​2​C​2​O​4 standard​
​ solution​
​ used,
​ N
F= volume of stock NaNO​2​ solution taken for titration
Sample calculation for NaNO​2 standardization:

((50.50 mL)(0.05127 N KMnO4)− (15.00 mL)(0.05126 N Na2C2O4))x 7


[NO2—N] = 50.00 mL NaNO2 = 0.2548 mg N/mL

b. Calibration curve

Figure 4. Calibration curve for nitrite analysis

c. Wastewater sample Data

Absorbance Concentration (ppm)

0.126 0.01744

0.125 0.01730

0.126 0.01744

0.126 0.01744

0.126 0.01744

0.126 0.01744

You might also like