ResearchMethod Expectedquestions
ResearchMethod Expectedquestions
Qualitative research is concerned with understanding human behavior and the reasons that
govern such behavior. It involves data collection methods like interviews, focus groups, and case
studies. It seeks to provide insights into how and why people make decisions, providing a deeper
understanding of motivations, emotions, and social contexts.
Quantitative research, on the other hand, involves the collection of data that can be quantified
and subjected to statistical analysis. It aims to determine the relationship between variables and
often uses surveys, experiments, and structured interviews to collect data. For example,
measuring customer satisfaction on a scale of 1-10 would be quantitative.
The literature review is a critical component of the research process that involves reviewing and
summarizing relevant previous studies. It helps in identifying gaps in current knowledge,
understanding the current state of the field, and providing a context for the new research. The
literature review helps in avoiding duplication, refining the research problem, and guiding the
development of research methodology. Additionally, it establishes a theoretical foundation and
justifies the significance of the new research by showing how it builds upon or diverges from
past work.
1. Identifying the Broad Area: Begin by identifying a general area of interest or a topic
relevant to your field.
2. Literature Review: Conduct a detailed review of existing literature to understand what
has already been studied and where the gaps are.
3. Defining the Problem: Narrow down the broad area to a specific, researchable issue or
question.
4. Operational Definitions: Clearly define the variables and terms to avoid ambiguity in the
research.
5. Setting Objectives: Formulate clear objectives that state what the research aims to
accomplish.
Variables are the characteristics or properties that can change or vary within an experiment or
study. Researchers identify variables by first defining the research problem and objectives. Once
the research questions are framed, the variables are determined as they represent the data to be
collected.
For instance, in a study measuring the impact of study hours on exam performance, study hours
is the independent variable, and exam performance is the dependent variable. The researcher
defines these variables by providing operational definitions, such as how study hours will be
measured (e.g., number of hours per week) and how exam performance will be evaluated (e.g.,
percentage scores).
Independent Variable: This is the variable that is manipulated or changed to observe its
effect on other variables. For example, in a study on the effect of fertilizer on plant
growth, the amount of fertilizer used is the independent variable.
Dependent Variable: This is the variable that is measured or observed to assess the effect
of changes in the independent variable. Continuing the example, the growth of the plant
(measured in height or biomass) is the dependent variable.
1. Clarity: The problem should be clearly defined and well-structured to avoid confusion.
2. Researchable: The problem must be researchable within the constraints of time,
resources, and the availability of data.
3. Significance: The problem should address an important issue that contributes to
knowledge in the field.
4. Feasibility: The problem should be manageable in terms of scope and complexity,
ensuring the research can be completed with available resources.
5. Novelty: It should provide scope for new insights or solutions, filling gaps in the current
literature.
Null Hypothesis (H₀): States that there is no effect or relationship between variables (e.g.,
"There is no difference in exam performance between students who study 5 hours a day
and those who study 2 hours a day").
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): Suggests that there is a significant effect or relationship
(e.g., "Students who study 5 hours a day perform better than those who study 2 hours a
day").
10. Explain the different scales of measurement used in research.
1. Nominal Scale: Categorizes data without any order or ranking (e.g., gender, race, etc.).
2. Ordinal Scale: Involves ordered data, but the difference between values is not meaningful
(e.g., ranking 1st, 2nd, 3rd in a race).
3. Interval Scale: Measures differences between values with meaningful intervals but
without a true zero (e.g., temperature in Celsius).
4. Ratio Scale: Has all the characteristics of an interval scale with a true zero (e.g., height,
weight, and age).
Operational definitions are specific descriptions of concepts that allow them to be measured or
observed. In research, operational definitions ensure that everyone involved in the study has a
clear understanding of the concepts being examined and how they will be measured. This
eliminates ambiguity and makes the research replicable.
Example: In a study on academic performance, “performance” might be operationally defined as
the students' average grade percentage across five subjects. In another study on stress, "stress"
might be defined as a score on a stress scale questionnaire.
Validity refers to the extent to which a research instrument measures what it is supposed to
measure. For instance, a test designed to assess math skills should measure math ability and not
reading skills. Validity can be further divided into content validity, construct validity, and
criterion validity. Reliability, on the other hand, refers to the consistency of a measurement. If a
research instrument yields the same results on repeated trials, it is considered reliable. For
example, a reliable weight scale will give the same reading every time it measures the same
object under the same conditions. A research study must aim for both validity and reliability to
ensure accurate and dependable results.
13. Discuss the difference between applied research and fundamental research.
Applied research is aimed at solving practical problems and often has immediate applications in
the real world. It is solution-oriented and usually conducted to improve practices, policies, or
products. For example, research on the effectiveness of a new teaching method in classrooms is
applied research. Fundamental research, also known as basic research, is conducted to expand
the general knowledge base and often has no immediate application. It seeks to understand
fundamental principles or phenomena, such as studying the behavior of subatomic particles in
physics. While applied research addresses specific, real-world problems, fundamental research
focuses on generating knowledge for the sake of knowledge.
A conceptual framework is a structure that a researcher uses to guide the study, linking concepts
and theories to form a coherent system of understanding. It outlines the key variables and
relationships that are important to the research question and provides a context for interpreting
the results.
Developing a conceptual framework typically involves:
1. Literature Review: Identifying existing theories and research related to the study topic.
2. Defining Variables: Determining the key variables that will be studied.
3. Establishing Relationships: Hypothesizing the relationships between variables.
4. Diagrammatic Representation: Creating a visual model to illustrate the relationships
between the key concepts.
For example, in a study on job satisfaction, the framework might show how factors like
salary, work environment, and job autonomy influence employee satisfaction.
1. Clear and Precise: The hypothesis should be clearly defined and leave no room for
ambiguity.
2. Testable: It should be possible to test the hypothesis with data and research methods.
3. Specific: The hypothesis should specify the relationship between variables clearly.
4. Consistent with Existing Knowledge: The hypothesis should be based on and align with
established theories or empirical findings.
5. Relevance: The hypothesis should address a significant question or problem related to the
research study. For example, a good hypothesis could be: "Students who spend more time
studying will have higher exam scores than those who spend less time."
1. Ambiguity in the Problem: The problem may be too broad or vague, making it difficult to
define precisely.
2. Literature Gaps: A lack of relevant or sufficient literature can make it hard to refine the
problem.
3. Practical Constraints: Time, funding, and resource limitations may restrict the scope of
the problem.
4. Stakeholder Expectations: Conflicting expectations from stakeholders (e.g., sponsors,
advisors) can complicate the problem definition.
5. Operationalization: Defining abstract concepts in measurable terms can be challenging.
To overcome these challenges, researchers must conduct a thorough literature review,
consult with experts, and carefully delimit the scope of their study.
Research objectives are formulated by clearly defining what the researcher aims to achieve in the
study. They guide the entire research process, providing a focus for data collection and analysis.
To formulate research objectives:
1. Identify the Main Research Problem: Clearly state what issue or question the research
seeks to address.
2. Specify the Scope: Narrow down the problem to make it manageable and focus on
specific aspects.
3. Use Action Words: Objectives should start with verbs such as "analyze," "investigate,"
"determine," or "explore."
4. Keep Objectives Realistic: Ensure that the objectives can be achieved with the available
resources. Example: In a study on job satisfaction, an objective might be, "To investigate
the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover in IT companies."
Ethical considerations are critical in research to ensure that participants are treated fairly,
respectfully, and safely. Some key ethical issues include:
1. Informed Consent: Participants must be fully informed about the study and give their
voluntary consent to participate.
2. Confidentiality: Researchers must protect the privacy of participants by ensuring that
their data is kept confidential.
3. Avoiding Harm: The researcher must avoid causing physical, psychological, or emotional
harm to participants.
4. Deception: Misleading participants about the purpose or nature of the research should be
avoided unless absolutely necessary, and debriefing should follow.
5. Data Integrity: Researchers must present data honestly and accurately, avoiding
fabrication or manipulation. Ethical research maintains the credibility of the study and
protects the welfare of participants.
Extraneous variables are variables that are not the focus of a study but can influence the
outcome, potentially leading to biased results. These variables can interfere with the relationship
between the independent and dependent variables.
For example, in a study on the effect of a new teaching method on student performance, factors
like classroom environment or students' prior knowledge could be extraneous variables.
Researchers can control extraneous variables by:
The methods of data collection in research can be classified as primary and secondary:
1. Primary Data Collection: This involves gathering new, firsthand data directly from
sources. The main methods include:
o Surveys: Use of structured questionnaires to gather data from a large group.
o Interviews: Face-to-face or telephonic conversations to gather detailed responses.
o Observation: Recording behaviors or events as they occur.
o Experiments: Manipulating variables in controlled conditions to observe effects.
2. Secondary Data Collection: This involves using existing data collected by other sources
like books, journals, reports, and databases. Examples include government publications,
industry reports, and academic research.
22. What are the advantages and limitations of using questionnaires in data collection?
Advantages:
Limitations:
1. Limited Depth: They may not provide in-depth insights into complex issues.
2. Misinterpretation: Respondents may misinterpret questions, leading to inaccurate data.
3. Low Response Rate: Particularly in online surveys, response rates can be low.
4. No Flexibility: There is no opportunity to clarify answers or probe deeper.
23. Compare the interview method and observation method in data collection.
Interview Method:
Observation Method:
Sampling is the process of selecting a subset of individuals from a population to represent the
whole population. There are two main types of sampling:
1. Probability Sampling: Every individual has a known, non-zero chance of being selected.
o Simple Random Sampling: Every member has an equal chance of selection.
o Stratified Sampling: The population is divided into strata, and random samples are
taken from each.
o Cluster Sampling: The population is divided into clusters, and a random sample of
clusters is selected.
2. Non-Probability Sampling: Individuals are selected based on subjective judgment, and
not all individuals have an equal chance of selection.
o Convenience Sampling: Selecting participants who are easily accessible.
o Purposive Sampling: Selecting individuals based on the purpose of the study.
o Snowball Sampling: Existing participants refer other participants.
1. Population Size: The total number of people in the group being studied.
2. Confidence Level: The level of certainty the researcher has that the sample represents the
population (e.g., 95% confidence level).
3. Margin of Error: The allowable difference between the sample results and the true
population value (e.g., ±5%).
4. Variability: The degree to which the population is homogeneous or heterogeneous.
Greater variability requires a larger sample size.
5. Available Resources: Time, cost, and logistical constraints also influence sample size
decisions.
Probability sampling ensures that every individual in the population has a known, non-zero
chance of being selected. The main types are:
1. Simple Random Sampling: Each member of the population has an equal chance of being
selected.
2. Stratified Sampling: The population is divided into strata (subgroups), and random
samples are drawn from each stratum.
3. Cluster Sampling: The population is divided into clusters, and entire clusters are
randomly selected for study.
4. Systematic Sampling: Selecting every nth individual from a list of the population.
Non-probability sampling is where not all members of the population have an equal chance of
being selected. It is often used when probability sampling is impractical. Examples include:
Primary Data:
Collected directly by the researcher for the specific purpose of their study.
Examples: Surveys, interviews, experiments, observations.
Advantage: Highly relevant and specific to the research question.
Disadvantage: Can be time-consuming and expensive to collect.
Secondary Data:
Collected by someone else for a different purpose but used by the researcher.
Examples: Government reports, academic articles, historical records.
Advantage: Easily accessible and often less costly.
Disadvantage: May not exactly fit the current research needs or be outdated.
29. How is data editing and coding done in the research process?
Data editing involves reviewing collected data to correct errors or inconsistencies, ensuring
completeness and accuracy. It can be done manually or electronically.
Manual Editing: Checking each questionnaire or survey response for missing data or
mistakes.
Electronic Editing: Using software to identify inconsistencies or outliers.
Data coding involves assigning numerical or symbolic codes to responses so that they can be
entered into a computer for statistical analysis. For example, in a survey on gender, “Male”
might be coded as “1” and “Female” as “2.”
Statistical tools are used to organize, summarize, and analyze data to derive meaningful insights.
Their roles include:
1. Descriptive Statistics: Summarizing data using measures like mean, median, mode, and
standard deviation.
2. Inferential Statistics: Making predictions or inferences about a population based on
sample data (e.g., hypothesis testing, regression analysis).
3. Data Visualization: Representing data graphically using charts and plots (e.g., bar charts,
histograms) to identify patterns or trends.
4. Hypothesis Testing: Using tools like t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-square tests to test
hypotheses about relationships between variables.
Data tabulation involves organizing data into tables for easier analysis. It helps in summarizing
large amounts of data, allowing for comparison and interpretation. Classification involves
grouping data into categories based on characteristics to simplify complex datasets. It helps in
identifying patterns, trends, and relationships within the data, making it easier to analyze and
draw conclusions.
32. How can data reliability and validity be ensured in research?
Ensuring that research instruments measure what they are intended to (content validity).
Aligning the research methods with the objectives of the study.
Consulting experts during the development of the research instrument for feedback.
1. Title and Abstract: The title should be concise and descriptive, and the abstract should
provide a brief summary of the research objectives, methodology, findings, and
conclusions.
2. Introduction: This section outlines the background of the study, the research problem,
objectives, and the significance of the research.
3. Literature Review: Summarizes the existing research and theoretical framework,
highlighting gaps that the current study addresses.
4. Methodology: Describes the research design, sampling methods, data collection
techniques, and analysis procedures.
5. Results: Presents the findings of the research, often using tables, graphs, and statistical
data.
6. Discussion: Interprets the findings in the context of the research question and compares
them with existing literature.
7. Conclusion and Recommendations: Summarizes the main findings and suggests areas for
further research or practical applications.
8. References/Bibliography: A list of all sources and literature cited in the report.
9. Appendices: Additional materials such as questionnaires, raw data, and detailed tables
that support the research but are not included in the main text.
1. Title Page: Includes the title of the research, the researcher’s name, institutional
affiliation, and date of submission.
2. Abstract: A concise summary of the entire report, covering the research objectives,
methodology, findings, and conclusions.
3. Introduction: Explains the background, significance of the research, and research
objectives.
4. Literature Review: A comprehensive review of related studies, identifying gaps the
current research seeks to fill.
5. Methodology: Details the research design, sampling techniques, data collection methods,
and analysis procedures.
6. Results: Presents the findings in an organized manner, often using tables, figures, and
statistical analysis.
7. Discussion: Interprets the findings, comparing them with previous research, and
discussing their implications.
8. Conclusion: Summarizes the main findings and offers recommendations for further
research or practical application.
9. References: Lists all sources cited in the report.
10. Appendices: Contains supplementary material, such as questionnaires, datasets, and
detailed calculations.
36. What are the ethical issues associated with data collection and analysis in research?
1. Informed Consent: Participants must be fully informed about the research and voluntarily
agree to participate.
2. Confidentiality: Researchers must protect participants' personal data and ensure that it is
not disclosed without consent.
3. Anonymity: Participants’ identities should not be linked to their data unless they have
given explicit permission.
4. Honesty in Data Collection: Researchers should avoid fabricating or manipulating data
and report findings truthfully.
5. Avoiding Harm: Data collection methods should not cause physical, psychological, or
emotional harm to participants.
6. Proper Data Analysis: Data should be analyzed objectively, and results should not be
manipulated to fit predetermined outcomes.
37. How do you ensure the accuracy and precision of data collected through surveys?
1. Pilot Testing: Conducting a pilot test helps to refine the survey instrument and identify
any confusing or unclear questions.
2. Standardization: Using a standardized format for questions and response options helps in
maintaining consistency across respondents.
3. Clear Instructions: Providing clear, concise instructions to respondents helps to minimize
misunderstandings.
4. Avoiding Bias: Questions should be carefully worded to avoid leading or biased
responses.
5. Cross-Validation: Using multiple questions to measure the same construct (triangulation)
can improve the accuracy of the data.
6. Follow-Up: Conducting follow-up surveys or interviews with participants can help clarify
ambiguous or incomplete responses.
38. What is the significance of using graphs and tables in research reports?
1. Simplify Complex Data: Visuals make it easier to understand and interpret large volumes
of data.
2. Highlight Key Findings: Graphs and tables allow researchers to emphasize the most
important trends or patterns.
3. Improve Readability: Visual elements break up the text and make reports more engaging
and easier to read.
4. Facilitate Comparison: Tables and graphs make it easy to compare different sets of data,
identify relationships, and draw conclusions.
5. Enhance Credibility: Clear visual representation of data adds credibility to the findings
and supports the arguments made in the report.
39. Explain the process of testing hypotheses with statistical tools.
The process of testing hypotheses using statistical tools involves the following steps:
1. State the Hypotheses: Formulate the null hypothesis (H₀) and alternative hypothesis (H₁).
2. Select a Significance Level: Determine the significance level (usually 0.05) that will be
used to test the hypothesis.
3. Choose a Statistical Test: Depending on the type of data and the research design, select
an appropriate test (e.g., t-test, chi-square test, ANOVA).
4. Calculate the Test Statistic: Using the collected data, calculate the test statistic.
5. Compare with Critical Value: Compare the test statistic with the critical value from
statistical tables.
6. Draw Conclusions: If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, reject the null hypothesis
(H₀). Otherwise, fail to reject H₀.
Referencing and citation are important in research writing for several reasons: