Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

Course: Big Data Integration
Code: 203008077

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Step 2 Big Data Analytics and Machine
Learning

1. Activity Description

Type of activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 1
Highest score of the activity: 175 points
The activity starts on: Wednesday, The activity ends on: Sunday, October
September 4, 2024 13, 2024
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

Distinguishes what problems are and what are not big data through the reformulation
from the data science for a correct choice of model predictions based on data.
The activity consists of:

Dear Student at the end of step 2, you should have the following products.
• Activity 1. Conceptual Map
• Activity 2. Description of Data domain
• Activity 3. Description of Data training, validation, and test
• Activity 4. The distinction of Machine Learning for computer processing
• Activity 5. Pass and obtain accreditation Big Data 101, for the IBM certification.
• Activity 6. Socialization in the Forum

For the development of the activity, it is recommended:

➢ Read the activity guide and rubric evaluation carefully.

1
 ➢ Review each of the steps proposed for the solution of the 6 activities, it is
recommended not to skip steps and read them in order.
➢ Review the general guidelines for the preparation of the learning evidence to be
delivered.
➢ Make significant contributions in the forum for the development of the work.

Detailed description of the activities to be carried out

Activity 1. Conceptual Map
For the development of this exercise, it is necessary to review the references in the
Learning Environment (Unit 1 - Historical interpretation and review of Big Data-
Contents and bibliographic references)
After reviewing the suggested references, the student must make a conceptual map
with the following concepts:

• Business Analytics.
• Data and Statistical Methods.

For the construction of the conceptual map, tools such as Cmaptools, GoCongr,
PowerPoint, among others, can be used; then, this conceptual map has to be shared
in the discussion forum.

Activity 2. Description of Data domain

Using an illustrative scheme, you should portray a Venn Diagram of the 5 Vs
attributes of Big Data, including the following points for statistics domain:

• Description of Data processing.

• Data analysis.

2
• Data visualization.

Activity 3. Description of Data training, validation, and test

Taking into account the bibliographic references and others sources, the student
must create a presentation of 3 slides including the explanation of the Data training,
validation and test.

Activity 4. The distinction of Machine Learning for computer processing

Based on the references, you have to make a comparison chart where you include
and explain the importance of Machine Learning for computer processing
(Unsupervised, Supervised and Reinforcement Learning).

Activity 5. Pass and obtain accreditation Big Data 101, for the IBM
certification.
For the development of this exercise, it is necessary to review the references in the
Learning Environment (Unit 1 - Historical interpretation and review of Big Data-
Contents and bibliographic references).

After reviewing the suggested references, the student will go on the Cognitive Class
platform as a continuation of your academic progression. The task involves your
enrollment in a course that builds upon the concepts and lessons covered in our prior
learning guide activities. By successfully completing this course, you will not only
exhibit your comprehensive understanding of the material but also obtain the esteemed
IBM certification, symbolizing your mastery in this domain.

Activity 6. Socialization in the Forum

3
You must share the development of Activity 5 in the forum and provide feedback on
the Exercise that some classmates shared too.

For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must:

• Review the presentation of the course, accept the rules and conditions for the
development of the course and review the course agenda.

In the Learning Environment, you must:

• Revise the bibliographic reference of the Unit 1 - Historical interpretation and
review of Big Data.
• Share in the discussion forum the development of Activity 5.
• Feedback about Activity 5 shared by a classmate in the discussion forum.
In the Evaluation Environment, you must:
• Upload the PDF document with the parameters requested in the step 2

Evidences of individual work:

The individual evidence to be submitted is:

The final document delivered must have a cover, the development of the 6 activities
and bibliographical references
Evidences of collaborative work:
No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Individual evidences, consider the following:

• Make a general survey of the course and of each of the environments before
approaching the development of the activities.

• Identify the resources and referents of the unit to which the activity corresponds.

4
• Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

• Participate in the discussion forum applying the rules of Virtual Netiquette,

always showing respect for the ideas of your peers and the faculty.

• Do not commit fraud, plagiarism or acts that threaten the normal academic
development of activities

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.

5
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

3. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Intermediate Unit 1
The highest score in this activity is 175 points
First evaluation High level: The student presented clearly the topic chosen in a
criterion: conceptual map made with a digital tool.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
The student and 35 points
distinguishes the
main concepts of Average level: The student presented in an acceptable way the
Business Analytics topic synthesized in a conceptual map, however, the digital tool
and Data and management is regular.
Statistical Methods. If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
and 19 points
This criterion
represents 35 Low level: The student doesn’t synthesize the topics in a
points of the total conceptual map. Either does not carry out the activity in the
of 175 points of English language
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 9 points
Second evaluation
High level: The student clearly presented the chosen topic in
criterion:
the presentation prepared with a digital tool
If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
Description of Data
and 35 points
domain

6
This criterion Average level: The student presented a discussion on the
represents 35 description of the data domain, however, some ideas lack clear
points of the total arguments.
of 175 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
the activity. and 19 points

Low level: The student does not present description of the data
domain. Either does not carry out the activity in the English
language
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points
and 9 points
Third evaluation High level: The student presented the Description of Data
criterion: training, validation and test.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
Description of Data and 35 points
training, validation
and test Average level: The student presented the description of the
training, validation and testing of data, however, some
This criterion comparisons lack clear arguments.
represents 35 If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
points of the total and 19 points
of 175 points of
the activity. Low level: The student does not present the description of the
training validation and data test. Either does not carry out the
activity in the English language
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points
and 9 points
Fourth evaluation
criterion: High level: The student makes the distinction of Machine
Learning for computer processing
The distinction of If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
Machine Learning and 35 points
for computer
processing. Average level: The student makes the distinction of machine
learning for computer processing, however, some ideas
This criterion mentioned lack clarity.
represents 35 If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
points of the total and 19 points
of 175 points of
the activity.

7
 Low level: The student does not present the distinction of
machine learning for computer processing. Either does not carry
out the activity in the English language
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points
and 9 points
Fifth evaluation High level: The student enrolls in the course, completes it, also
criterion: attaches the certificate and badges as evidence of their learning
process.
Pass and obtain If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
accreditation Big and 35 points
Data 101, for the
IBM certification Average level: The student enrolls in the course and passes
it, but does not attach the certificate and the badges, or does
This criterion not obtain these certifications, as evidence of their learning
represents 35 process.
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
of 175 points of and 19 points
the activity.
Low level: The student does not enroll in the course or does
not complete it.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 9 points