RPH Reviewer
RPH Reviewer
RPH Reviewer
Agrarian reform
→ is essentially the rectification of the whole system of agriculture.
Important aspect of the Philippines because nearly half of the population is employed in the agricultural sector,
and most citizens live in rural areas.
Centered on the relationship between production and distribution of land among farmers.
Rectification
it is the act of correcting something or making something right.
Encomienda System
an abusive and unfair system
Filipino farmers were made to sell their products at a low price or surrender their products to the
encomenderos, who resold this at a profit
"compras y vandalas" became a norm for filipinos
"Compras y vandalas" refers to stealing goods from stores and vandalizing property, typically during civil
unrest.
Also, Filipinos were required to render services to their encomenderos that were unrelated to farming.
Hacienda System
developed in the beginning of the 19th century
The economy was tied to the world market as the Philippines became an exporter of raw materials and importer
of goods.
Agricultural exports were demanded
In 1860, Spain enacted a law ordering landholders to register their landholdings and only those who knew
benefitted from this.
Lands were claimed and registered in other people’s names, and many peasant families who were assigned to
the land in the earlier days of colonization were driven out or forced to come under the power of these people
who claimed rights to the land because they held a title.
Before the colonization, Filipinos had communal ownership of land.
This system became source of hatred and discontent for Filipinos.
Religious Orders (Biggest Landowners in the Philippines) – main source of abuse and exploitation as they
increased the rent paid by the Filipinos.
Filipinos fought the Philippine Revolution in a confluence of motivations, but the greatest desire for freedom
would be the necessity of owning land.
Upon the end of the Philippine revolution, the revolutionary government would declare all large landed estates,
especially the confiscated friar lands as government property.
The entrance of Americans would signal a new era of colonialism and imperialism. They are aware that that the
main cause of social unrest in the Philippines was landlessness. They attempted to put an end to the deplorable
conditions of the tenant farmers by passing several land policies to increase the small landholders and distribute
ownership to a bigger number of Filipinos.
Torrens system to address the absence of earlier records of issued land titles and conduct accurate land surveys.
Homestead program
1903
Allowing a tenant to enter into an agricultural business by acquiring a farm of at least 16 hectares.
Limited to areas in Northern Luzon and Mindanao
Landownership worsened
There is no limit to the size of landholdings people can possess.
The accessibility of possession was limited to those who can afford to buy, register, and acquire fixed property
titles
Not all friar lands acquired by the Americans were given to landless peasant farmers.
Some lands were sold or leased to American and Filipino business interest.
This Land reform program was also implemented without support mechanisms.
The system introduced by the Americans enabled more lands to be placed under tenancy and led to widespread peasant
uprisings, such as the Colorum and Sakdal Uprising in Luzon.
“Sakdal” – to accuse
Title of the newspaper helmed by Benigno Ramos.
He rallied support from manila and nearby provinces thru publication which led to the establishment of
Partido Sakdalista in 1933.
Demanded reforms from the government such as abolition of taxes and equal or common ownership of land
among others.
The commonwealth failed due to budget allocation for the settlement program and widespread peasant uprisings and
the World War 2 put a halt to all interventions to solve these problems as the Japanese occupied the country.
- The administration spearheaded the establishment of the Agricultural and Industrial Bank to provide easier terms in
applying for homestead and other farmlands.
- Despite a more vigorous effort toward agrarian reform, the situation for the farmers remained dire, since the
government lacked funds and provided inadequate support services for the programs.
- The landed elite did not fully cooperate and criticized the programs.
Primary Source: Declaration of Policy under RA No. 3844 or Agricultural Land Reform Code
Source: Section 2 of RA 3844
lt is the policy of the state:
1. To establish owner-cultivatorship and the economic family-size farm as the basis of Philippine agriculture and, as
consequence, divert landlord capital in agriculture to industrial development.
2. To achieve a dignified existence for the small farmers free from pernicious institutional restraints and practices.
3. To create a truly viable social and economic structure in agriculture conducive to greater productivity and higher
farm incomes.
4. To apply all labor laws equally and without discrimination to both industrial and agricultural wage earners;
5. To provide a more vigorous and systematic land resettlement program and public land distribution; and
6. To make the small farmers more independent, self-reliant and responsible citizens, and a source of genuine
strength in our democratic society.
- Congress did not make any effort to come up with a separate bill to fund its implementation, despite being one of the
most comprehensive pieces of land reform legislation ever passed in the Philippines, and even though it proved
beneficial in the provinces where it was pilot tested.
• In 1972, President Marcos declared Martial Law, eliminating the landlord-dominated Congress and expanding
executive power for a fundamental restructuring of the government, addressing rural structural issues.
• During the Marcos regime, the Code of Agrarian Reform of the Philippines, also known as Presidential Decree No.
27, became the core of agrarian reform in the Philippines.
Primary Source: Presidential Decree No. 27, 21 October 1972
• This shall apply to tenant farmers of private agricultural lands primarily devoted to rice and corn under a system of
sharecrop or lease-tenancy, whether classified as landed estate or not;
• The tenant farmer, whether in land classified as landed estate or not, shall be deemed owner of a portion constituting
a family-size farm of five (5) hectares if not irrigated and three (3) hectares if irrigated;
• In all cases, the landowner may retain an area of not more than seven (7) hectares if such landowner is cultivating
such area or will now cultivate it;
For the purpose of determining the cost of the land to be transferred to the tenant-farmer pursuant to this Decree, the
value of the land shall be equivalent to two and one-half (2 1/2) times the average harvest of three normal crop years
immediately preceding the promulgation of this Decree;
The total cost of the land, including interest at the rate of six (6) per centum per annum, shall be paid by the tenant in
fifteen (15) years of fifteen (15) equal annual amortizations;
The defaulting tenant-farmer must pay the amortization due to the farmers’ cooperative, which has recourse rights. The
government guarantees these with government-owned shares. Land title isn't issued until full-fledged member of a
recognized cooperative.
Title to land acquired pursuant to this Decree or the Land Reform Program of the Government shall not be transferable
except by hereditary succession or to the Government in accordance with the provisions of this Decree, the Code of
Agrarian Reforms and other existing laws and regulations;
The Department of Agrarian Reform through its Secretary is hereby empowered to promulgate rules and regulations for
the implementation of this Decree.
"Operation Land Transfer" on lands occupied by tenants of more than seven hectares on rice and corn lands
commenced, and through legal compulsion and an improved delivery of support services to small farmers, agrarian
reform seemed to be finally achievable. Under the rice self-sufficiency program.
'Masagana '99," farmers were able to borrow from banks and purchase three-hectare plots of lands and agricultural
inputs. However, the landlord class still found ways to circumvent the law. Because only rice lands were the focus of
agrarian reform, some landlords only needed to change crops to be exempted from the program, such as coconut and
sugar lands. Lands worked by wage labor were also exempt from the program, so the landed elite only had to evict their
tenants and hired workers instead.
Landlessness increased, which made it all the more difficult for the program to succeed because landless peasants were
excluded from the program. Many other methods were employed by the elite to find a way to maintain their power and
dominance, which were worsened by the corruption of Marcos and his cronies who were also involved in the
agricultural sector.
The current Constitution has been in effect since 1987. There were only three (3) other constitutions
that have effectively governed the country: the 1935 commonwealth constitution, the 1973 constitution, and
the 1986 freedom constitution.
1. Assembly of Representatives
Legislative power was vested in this unicameral body
4 years term
Additional power vested:
1. The right to select its own officers
2. Right of censure and interpellation
3. The right of impeaching the president, cabinet members, the chief justice of the
Supreme Court, and the solicitor-general.
Because of the additional power vested (judicial), these members became also the
judicial body.
2. President
Executive power
elected by a constituent assembly of the Assembly of Representatives and special
representatives.
4 years without re-election.
There was no vice president, and in case of a vacancy, a president was to be selected by
the constituent assembly.
The 1899 Malolos Constitution was never enforced due to the ongoing war. The Philippines was effectively a
territory of the United States upon the signing of the Treaty of Paris between Spain and the United States,
transferring sovereignty of the Philippines on 10 December 1898.
The constitution was drafted to meet the approval of the United States government, and to ensure that the
United States would live up to its promise to grant independence to the Philippines.
The constitution created the Commonwealth of the Philippines an administrative body that governed
the Philippines from 1935 to1946.
It is a transitional administration to prepare the country toward its full achievement of independence.
It originally provided for a unicameral National Assembly with a president and vice president elected
to a six-year term without re-election.
It was amended in 1940 to have a bicameral Congress composed of a Senate and a House of
Representatives, as well as the creation of an independent electoral commission, and limited the term
or office of the president and vice president to four years, with one re-election.
The draft of the constitution was approved by the constitutional convention on 8 February 1935, and
ratified by then U.S. President Franklin B. Roosevelt on 25 March 1985.
Elections were held in September 1935 and Manuel L. Quezon was elected President of the
Commonwealth. The Commonwealth was briefly interrupted by the events of the World War II, with
the Japanese occupying the Philippines. Afterward, upon liberation, the Philippines was declared an
independent republic on 4 July 1946.
Only the House of Representatives can initiate the impeachment of the president, members of the Supreme
Court, and other constitutionally protected public officials such as the Ombudsman. The Senate will then try
the impeachment case. This is another safeguard to promote moral and ethical conduct in the government.
Attempts to Amend or Change the 1987 Constitution
1. The first attempt was in 1995, when then Secretary of National Security Council Jose Almonte drafted a
constitution, but it was exposed to the media and it never prospered.
2. The second effort happened in 1997, when a group called PIRMA hoped to gather signatures from
voters to change the constitution through people's initiative. Many were against this, including then
Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago, who brought the issue to court and won-with the supreme Court
judging that a people's initiative cannot push through without an enabling law.
Federalism
supported by President Duterte in the 2016 presidential elections
As a form of government, a central governing authority and constituent political units constitutionally
share sovereignty.
Applied to the Philippines, the country will be broken into autonomous regions.
Each region will be further divided into local government units.
The regions will have the primary responsibility of industry development, public safety and
instruction, education, healthcare, transportation, and many more.
Each region will also take charge of their own finances, plans for development, and laws exclusive to
their area.
The national government, on the other hand, will only handle matters of national interest such as
foreign policy and defense, among others. In this system, it is possible for the central government and
the regions to share certain powers.
Benefits of Federalism
1. Each region may custom fit solutions to problems brought about by their distinct
geographic, cultural, social, and economic contexts.
2. Regions also have more power over their finances, since they handle majority of their
income and only contributes to a small portion to the national government. They can
choose to directly fund their own development projects without asking for the national
government's go signal.
3. A federal system could also promote specialization, since the national government could
focus on nationwide concerns while regional governments can take care of administrative
issues.
4. A federal form of government could also solve a lot of decade-old problems of the country.
It may be a solution to the conflict in Mindanao, since a separate Bangsamoro region could
be established for Muslim Mindanao.
5. It could address the inequality in wealth distribution and lessen the dependence to Metro
Manila, since regions can proceed with what they have to do without needing to consider
the situation in the capital.
Cons of Federalism
1. While it creates competition among regions, it could also be a challenge to achieving unity in the
country.
2. There might be regions which are not ready to govern themselves, or have lesser resources, which
could mire them deeper in poverty and make development uneven in the country.
3. There could be issues regarding overlaps in jurisdiction, since ambiguities may arise where national
ends and regional begins, or vice versa. As a proposed solution to the conflict in Mindanao, we must
also remember that the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) has already been created,
and the conflict still continues.
4. Federalism may not be enough for those who clamor separation. Any effort to shift the system of
government also entails costs, and it would not be cheap. It would cost billions to dismantle the
current system and would take a long time before the system normalizes and irons out its kinks.