Nian Guo Dong
Nian Guo Dong
Nian Guo Dong
1 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Address for correspondence Hao Hong, MD, Department of
Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College,
Wuhan, Hubei, PR China Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Road,
Wuhan, 430022, China (e-mail: [email protected]).
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Abstract Background Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard approach for several
cardiac diseases. In this retrospective study, we compared right anterolateral mini-
hospital. The aims of this retrospective study were to compare mitral valve was inspected and examined revealing a compe-
the safety, efficacy, cosmetic outcome, and cost between the tent valve. Atrial septal was reconstructed with a Dacron
two approaches. patch, (Boston Scientific Ltd., St. Albans, United Kingdom),
before closure of the left atrium. The left atriotomy was closed
using double-layer continuous Prolene 4–0 (Ethicon, Somer-
Materials and Methods
ville, New Jersey, United States) running sutures. Once the
Preoperative Clinical Data patient was weaned from CPB, a TEE control was always
After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board, performed to look for residual tumor, adequate removal of air,
we retrospectively collected the medical data of 30 patients and a residual interatrial shunt. Pericardial and pleural drains
who underwent RALT and 36 patients who underwent SMS were inserted. The thoracotomy was closed and the femoral
between January 2009 and June 2015. LAM was diagnosed vessels were decannulated.
using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed by
experienced echocardiographers. Patients underwent LAM Standard Median Sternotomy Group
resection by the same surgical team in RALT and SMS groups. Surgery was performed via full median sternotomy, under
Selection for one of the two approaches was chosen by CPB, mild hypothermia, topical cooling, and hyperkalemic
specialists’ recommendation and the patients. All patients cardioplegia. Aortic and bicaval cannulation was always
were fully informed about two approaches and gave consent performed. Special attention was taken to avoid cardiac
Abbreviations: CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; ICU, intensive care unit; PRBC, packed red blood cells; RALT, right
anterolateral minithoracotomy; RMB, Renminbi, the Chinese currency; SMS, standard median sternotomy.
Note: Data presented as mean þ standard deviation, median (interquartile), or n (%).
operative profiles in each group. The aortic cross-clamp and not significantly increased with RALT approach (►Table 2). In
CPB time for RALT group were 50.2 5.8 and 87.8 10.4 addition, when compared with SMS group, our study did
minutes, respectively; for SMS group, they were 47.6 5.9 demonstrate a shorter length of ICU and postoperative
and 83.6 8.4 minutes, p ¼ 0.078 and p ¼ 0.076, respective- hospital stay in RALT group. These reductions in the lengths
ly. The dimensions of myxoma were similar in two groups of stay are most likely due to the following reasons: (1)
(p ¼ 0.073 and p ¼ 0.124). The incisions included RALT inci- enhanced recovery noted with minimally invasive surgery;
sion, incision for Chitwood clamp, incision for intraoperative (2) less surgical trauma and less pain; and (3) a faster return to
drainage, incision for postoperative drainage, and femoral normal activity.12–14 As length of stay may be considered a
incision. The total incision length was significantly shorter in surrogate marker for resource use, a prolonged length of stay
RALT group compared with SMS group (p < 0.001). There was increases hospital cost at all levels.15,16 Previous reports
no conversion from RALT approach to SMS. For RALT and SMS showed that shorter hospital stay resulting from a minimally
groups, respectively, the ICU length of stay was 29.2 6.5 invasive approach has been equated to a 7 and 34% cost
versus 43.5 6.9 hours (p < 0.001), and the postoperative saving, respectively.17,18 Similar results were noted in our
hospital length of stay was 5 days (IQR: 4–6) versus 8 days study, when we analyzed the cost data in two groups. The
(IQR: 7–10) (p < 0.001). The total cost in RALT group was reduction in the length of ICU and hospital stay in RALT group
27,000 RMB (IQR: 25,000–29,000) versus 33,000 RMB (IQR: did equate to a reduction in total hospitalization cost.
31,000–35,000) in SMS group (p < 0.001). This was a short-term, single-center, retrospective study of
Discussion
LAM resection via SMS has been demonstrated as a safe surgery,
Funding
with minimal mortality and a minimal rate of recurrence and
This work was supported by grants from the National
this approach is considered as a routine approach in such cases.8
Natural Science Foundation of China (grand number
As technology advances, the minimally invasive approach is
81300174, 31330029) and Research Fund for the Doctoral
becoming more popular in routine cardiac surgery practice.
Program of Higher Education of China (fund number
Although initially more complicated for the surgeon, this type
20120142120078).
of surgery can potentially lessen incisional pain, minimize inci-
sional length, improve cosmetic results, decrease morbidity,
enhance functional recovery, and shorten hospital stay.9 The
Conflict of Interest
RALT approach is an excellent route to the interatrial cavity. It has
None declared.
provided surgeons with a satisfying surgical field and provided
the patients with cosmetic satisfaction, especially for young
women. Small and low chest wall incisions were used in RALT
approach. The incision can be hidden, with minimal dermatic References
scar in the front compared with SMS. 1 Shapiro LM. Cardiac tumours: diagnosis and management. Heart
The present study illustrates the successful application of 2001;85(2):218–222
2 Imperio J, Summers D, Krasnow N, Piccone VA Jr. The distribution
RALT technique in the resection of LAM. We did not find
patterns of biatrial myxomas. Ann Thorac Surg 1980;29(5):469–473
significant differences in terms of mortality and composite
3 Vistarini N, Alloni A, Aiello M, Viganò M. Minimally invasive video-
postoperative complications between RALT and SMS groups, assisted approach for left atrial myxoma resection. Interact Car-
suggesting that RALT approach is not inferior to SMS diovasc Thorac Surg 2010;10(1):9–11
approach. At 12 months of follow-up, we demonstrated 4 Actis Dato GM, De Benedictis M, Actis Dato A Jr, Ricci A, Sommariva L,
that there was no evidence of death, residual tumor, recurrent De Paulis R. Long-term follow-up of cardiac myxomas (7-31 years).
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1993;34(2):141–143
tumor, and residual interatrial shunt in the two groups.
5 Larrieu AJ, Jamieson WR, Tyers GF, et al. Primary cardiac tumors:
Previous study showed that prolonged operative time is a
experience with 25 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;83(3):
potential drawback of minimally invasive surgery.10 With 339–348
increased surgeon experience, the time might decrease.11 Our 6 Shahian DM, Labib SB, Chang G. Cardiac papillary fibroelastoma.
study showed that the aortic cross-clamp and CPB time was Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59(2):538–541
7 Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo MJ, et al. Long-term outcomes cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg 1997;226(4):
with a minimally invasive approach for resection of cardiac 421–426, discussion 427–428
masses. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90(4):1251–1255 13 Glower DD, Landolfo KP, Clements F, et al. Mitral valve operation
8 Reber D, Birnbaum DE. Recurrent cardiac myxoma: why it occurs. via Port Access versus median sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
A case report with literature review. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1998;14(Suppl 1):S143–S147
2001;42(3):345–348 14 Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve
9 Bjessmo S, Ivert T. Cardiac myxoma: 40 years’ experience in 63 surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(6):455–462
patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63(3):697–700 15 Lamelas J, Sarria A, Santana O, Pineda AM, Lamas GA. Outcomes of
10 Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy minimally invasive valve surgery versus median sternotomy in
versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a patients age 75 years or greater. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91(1):79–84
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 16 Black D, Pearson M. Average length of stay, delayed discharge, and
2009;137(3):670–679.e5 hospital congestion. BMJ 2002;325(7365):610–611
11 Luo H, Wang J, Qiao C, Zhang X, Zhang W, Song L. Evaluation of 17 Navia JL, Cosgrove DM III. Minimally invasive mitral valve oper-
different minimally invasive techniques in the surgical treatment of ations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62(5):1542–1544
atrial septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148(1):188–193 18 Chitwood WR Jr, Elbeery JR, Chapman WH, et al. Video-assisted
12 Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: the “micro-mitral” oper-
valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of ation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113(2):413–414