4 Thgradefractionsunit
4 Thgradefractionsunit
I,
By the end of the 4th grade Fractions module for fraction equivalence and ordering (4.NF.l and 4.NF.2)
Standards:
• 4.NF.1. Explain why a fraction alb is equivalent to a fraction (n x a)/(n x b) by using visual
fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the
two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate
equivalent fractions.
• 4.NF .2. Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by
creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such
as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same
whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions,
e.g., by using a visual fraction model.
The goal of Lessons 1- 5 is for students to understand how to create equivalent fractions using
area models and number lines and to develop an understanding of the written algorithm as a result of
this work. Over the course of the first 4 lessons students should primarily be working with the models
to find their answers; the connection between that work and the written algorithm should happen
organically. The algorithm should not be forced too quickly nor should it be avoided if it is student-
generated. As students discuss their strategies and the patterns that they notice, there will be some
students who begin to see the connection between the number of pieces into which each unit fraction
is broken and the number by which we multiply the numerator and denominator. Other students will
need more time to "sit" with that idea before they are ready to formalize it. As the connection begins
to surface throughout class discussions, a response such as, "Hmmm, Mary has made an interesting
observation. Let's make a note of it and see if her idea continues to work as we explore other
models." Subsequent group discussions should provide students the opportunity to revisit the
hypothesis, add to it, clarify it, and possibly change it if the original observation is found to not always
hold true. Once students have progressed through work with both the area and number line models
Lesson 5 can be used to cement the algorithm for all and to practice. For example .... "Today we are
going to think about Mary's observation, finalize it, and create a class algorithm that we will practice.
Remember that a few days ago Mary suggested .... when we got to the number line models we
modified this idea to .... Does anyone think that they can now state ONE rule that we could use to solve
all of these problems without drawing a model? And can you explain why this rule works by thinking
about our models?" The end goal of this day's lesson is for students to know the steps of the
algorithm, how each step connects to how they modified their models to solve a problem, and to begin
to develop fluency with the algorithm alone.
Lesson 6 - 7 (if needed): additional lesson days should be used to reinforce the concepts and the
algorithm learned in Lessons 1- 5 before administering the Formative Assessment for Equivalence.
• Can a model of % be partitioned to show sevenths? Why or why not? (in Lesson 1 Student
Worksheet)
• What patterns can I find when I keep partitioning unit fractions repeatedly (each unit into two
pieces, then each NEW unit into two pieces again, etc.) How many times can I keep partitioning?
Is there an end? (Lesson 1 Independent Problem Set Challenge Sheet)
• Can I work backwards? For example, if! end with the fraction 12/16, what fraction(s) might I
have started with? Could I have started with 4/5? Why or why not? Are there multiple fractions
with which I could have started? Why? Can I find other fractions that could have multiple
starting fractions?
• If I start with 8/10, can I tum it into xiS? What would x be? Our "rule" states: To make an
equivalent fraction, we can partition (break) each unit fraction into smaller equal pieces. Then
we multiply the numerator and denominator by the number of pieces we have in each unit
fraction. Does this rule work for 8/10 = xiS? Why or why not? How might we change the
wording in the rule to allow for this type of problem?
4.NF.2. Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating
common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2.
Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the
results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual
fraction model.
The goal of Lessons 9 - 20 is for students to understand how to compare and order fractions
using a variety of strategies including area models (physical and paper), number lines, benchmark
fractions, and by finding equivalent fractions. The strategy of finding equivalent fractions should
ultimately connect back to the work done in Lessons 1- 8 and should be supported with both area
models as well as the written algorithm for common denominators. After students activate prior
knowledge learned in third grade throughout Lessons 9 and 10, Lesson 11 offers a "free explore"
opportunity for students to generate their own strategies for comparing fractions with different
numerators and different denominators using whatever tools and reasoning strategies they have. This
lesson should end with a collection of class-generated strategies posted on the classroom wall.
Lessons 12 -15 provide students with a closer experience with each of the most important strategies.
If the group does not generate one of the strategies in these lessons the teacher should include "his"
strategy with a prompt such as, "Hmm, this is how I would compare those fractions- who thinks they
can explain my strategy?" If other strategies are generated by students the teacher should feel free to
add additional days to explore them. Wherever possible in Lessons 12 -14, the teacher should refer
back to the partitioning strategies studied in Lessons 1- 8. The lesson outlines provide more specific
suggestions where appropriate. This referring back will be helpful as students move into Lesson 15.
Lesson 9 (1 day)
Learning Goal: Students will understand that in order to compare fractions the fractions must
refer to the same whole. (Goal to post for students: Today we will discover when we can and cannot
compare two fractions). In this lesson, students will be asked to create a situation in which 1/2 is
greater than 1/2. They will develop and post a rule similar to the following: "In order to compare two
fractions, they MUST refer to the same size whole. If they refer to different size wholes we CANNOT
compare them."
Lesson 11 (1 day)
Learning Goal: Students will begin to develop strategies for comparing fractions with
different numerators and different denominators. (Goal to post for students: Today we will explore
ways to compare fractions with different numerators and denominators). In this lesson, students will
have the opportunity to develop a variety of strategies for comparing fractions; they will generate a
class list of possible strategies that will be explored in further depth over the next few lessons.
Lesson 14 (1 day):
Learning Goal: Students will compare fractions with different numerators and different
denominators usin'g 1 whole as a benchmark. (Goal to post for students: Today we will compare
fractions using 1 whole as a benchmark). In this lesson, the students will explore and practice
comparing fractions using 1 whole as a benchmark. Area models and number lines will be used to
support this approach.
Lesson 19 (if needed): (an) additional lesson day(s) should be used to reinforce the concepts and the
algorithm learned in all lessons 1 - 15 before administering the Summative Assessment for Fraction
Equivalence and Ordering.
In order to compare fractions, there are many strategies that can be used. Some of the most effective
ones are described in this document.
It is not necessary that every student master every strategy; however, the teacher should be fa miliar
with as many strategies as possible in order to:
• recognize if a student-created strategy is mathematically correct
• have a "toolkit" of strategies that can be used by students
It is essential for students to remember that the fractions being compared MUST refer to the same
whole.
Students can compare area models to compare fractions either by using physical fraction
manipulatives or by drawing pictures. In an area model, the model that represents the larger area is
the larger fraction.
3/4
5/6
3/4 5/6
..~~\
. ~~!f . . ,,- :
,. 1; .......:.. .
I"
l! ~
:.;. ... ~.
3/4 5/6
Students can use number lines to compare fractions by plotting the points on one or on two number
lines. The point further to the right represents the larger fraction.
- 1
0
,
2/3
1 •
1
5/8
- 1
0
+ 1 •
1
-Io + 1
1 ·
In order to show eighths I have to partition this number line differently. Think: I have 2 pieces; I need
8 ... how can I partition my number line to get 8 pieces? Each half needs to be partitioned into 4 pieces
so that I have 8 pieces in all. Now I can show 3/8.
1/2
3/8
o 1
Fractions that have the same denominator: Different number of same size pieces
Two fractions with the same denominator have a DIFFERENT NUMBER of the SAME SIZE pieces.
For example, 2/3 and 1/3 ... thirds of the same whole are the same size; if I have 2 pieces that's more
than one piece (a different number (2 or 1) of the same size pieces (thirds)).
2/3 1/3
Fractions that have the same numerator: Same number of different size pieces
Two fractions with the same numerator have the SAME NUMBER of DIFFERENT SIZE pieces.
For example, 3/4 and 3/5 ... fourths are bigger than fifths; if I have three fourths I have MORE than if I
have three fifths (the same number (3) of different size pieces (fourths and fifths)).
3/4 3/5
Using a benchmark of 1/2: To compare 3/8 and 5/6, I know that 3/8 is smaller than 1/2 because half
of 8 is 4. I know that 5/6 is larger than 1/2 because half of 6 is 3. If 3/8 is smaller than 1/2 and 5/6 is
larger than 1/2 then 5/6 > 3/8.
Using a benchmark of 1: To compare 6/7 and 7/8, I know that 6/7 is 1/7 away from 1 and 7/8 is 1/8
away from 1. I know that 1/8 is smaller than 1/7, so 7/8 must be closer to one (and therefore larger).
I can compare fractions by finding equivalent fractions using partitioning strategies; this strategy
connects to the traditional algorithm, but it is important for students to understand the partitioning
concept BEFORE they memorize the algorithm.
I can find out how many sixths I have in 2/3 by partitioning each
1/3 section into 2 more sections to get six.ths.
The connection to the algorithm is shown below (the partitioning is represented by the multiplier in
the algorithm).
4
6
4 FEO Comparing Fractions Strategies 4/10/12
Lesson 16 - 17 (if needed): additional lesson days should be used to reinforce the concepts learned in
Lessons 9 - 15 before administering the Formative Assessment for Ordering. Any worksheets for
comparing fractions can be used ifthe denominators are within the range for 4th grade (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8,
10, 12, 100). At this point students should be welcome to use whatever strategy they like for each
problem.
Lesson 19 (if needed): (an) additional lesson day(s) should be used to reinforce the concepts and the
algorithm learned in all lessons I - 15 before administering the Summative Assessment for Fraction
Equivalence and Ordering.
I Thirds I ·1o 1
1
·
I Fourths I ·1o 1
1
·
I Fifths I · 1
o t·
I Sixths I ·1o I I I I I t·
I Eighths I ·1 I I I I I I I 1 ·
0 1
I Tenths I .1 I I I I I I I I I 1 ·
0 1
I Twelfths I ·1o I I I I I I I I I I I t·
Lesson 1 (1- 2 days)
Learning Goal: Students will develop a rule for generating equivalent fractions by
partitioning area models and will begin to look for patterns in the fraction pairs (Goal to postfor
students: Today we will discover how to create equivalent fractions and look for patterns). In this
lesson, students will be challenged to create different fractions from an area model of the fraction 3/4.
As a class, they will record the fractions they've generated, look for patterns between the starting
fraction (3/4) and the newly created fractions, and describe any patterns they notice.
Introduction: Show students an area model** of the fraction % and activate prior knowledge
such as:
• The definitions of numerator, denominator, unit fraction
• % represents Y4 + Y4 + Y4
• Fractional parts must be equal in size
Pose the first guiding question for the day:
• Is there a way to make this model show a different fraction without changing the size of the
whole or the size of the shaded region?
Take at least one suggestion from the class and discuss as a group; one possibility would be to draw a
horizontal line across the middle of the fraction to generate 6/8. Once students understand the task,
direct them to use their student worksheet** to find as many other fractions as they can.
Student work time: Students use the student worksheet** to generate other fractions by
partitioning the unit fractions.
Possible scaffolding:
o Guiding questions: "If I draw a line like this(demo) on this model what fraction does it
become?" "What happens if I draw more lines? "
o See modified student worksheet**
Possible extensions:
o See the challenge question at the bottom of the student worksheet* *
Group Discussion: The goal of the group discussion is to guide students to make the following
discoveries:
o We can make an equivalent fraction by partitioninglbreaking each unit fraction into
smaller (equal) pieces
o There are patterns that we can see when we look at the fraction pairs
Generate a class chart** of some of the fractions that students found on their worksheets. Include both
the area model and the written fraction. Use another chart to record the patterns that are noticed.
Guiding questions could be:
• What do you notice about the fraction pairs? (Possible answers: In each pair, the
numerator and the denominator are multiplied by the same number; all the numerators
are multiples of 3 and the denominators are multiples of 4)
• How many fractions do you think I could make starting with %? (Possible answers:
infinite- no limit, etc)
• Could I tum % into a fraction with a denominator of 7? Why or why not?
•
4FEO Lesson 1 Outline 3/20/12
End the group conversation by asking students to come up with an ending for this statement: "To make
an equivalent fraction, we ... " this should get posted on chart paper** for all to see over the course of
the module.
Independent Practice Time: Following the group discussion, students should have time to work
some problems independently**.
Check for Understanding: Exit Ticket**: one possible exit ticket option could be:
Amy started with the fraction 114. She thinks that if she breaks each unit fraction into 2 pieces
she will get 2/6. Is she right? Why or why not? Draw a model to find your answer.
1
-4
1
-4
1
4
1
-4
We can make this area model show the equivalent fraction 6/8 by partitioning
(breaking) each 1/4 into 2 pieces.
3
4
1
-81 -
1
8 -1
8
3
4
6
- -8
-a
1
-
1 1
8
Use the models below to find as many other equivalent fractions as you can by
partitioning the % model. Write the name of each new fraction that you make.
3 3
4 4
3 3
-4 - - 4
3 3
4 4
3 3
4 4
Look at all the equivalent fraction pairs that you created. What patterns do you
notice?
Challenge Question: Can you change this model of % to show ihs? Why or
why not? Draw a picture to support your answer.
-- 1
4
1
4-
-4 -4 1 1
We can make this area model show the fraction 6/8 by breaking each 1/4 into 2
pieces.
3
4
-1
S
1
8
3
4
-
6
8
- -
1
8
1
8
3 3
4 4
3 3
4 4
3 3
4 4
3 3
4 4
3 3
4 - 4 -
3 3
-4 - 4
3 3
-4 - 4
",
3 3
-4 - 4
1.
2 2 4
3 3 6
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
I~
CHALLENGE QUESTION: Shara started with this model of~. She partitioned
each unit fraction into 2 pieces to make Model 2 then partitioned each new unit
fraction into 2 pieces to make Model 3.
Below each model, write the fraction that is represented by each model.
How did you figure out what the next 3 fractions would be?
Why do you think that 1 is the only odd number in all of these fractions?
Experiment with other fractions. What happens if you start with 1/3 and keep
partitioning each unit fraction into three pieces?
If she breaks each unit fraction into 2 pieces will she get 2/6? _ _
VVhynot? ___________________________________________
Check for Understanding: Exit Ticket: one possible exit ticket option could be: "Mark needs
to solve the following problem: 3/5 = xllO. Hedraws this model. He thinks that he should break each
unit fraction into 4 pieces. Is he right? Why or why not1"** Draw a model to find Mark's answer.
Use the models to find the missing numerators. Write the missing numbers in
the boxes.
3 D
1.
--=-
4 8
2.
2 D
=-
3 9
3.
2
=-
D
5 10
4.
D
--=-
3
6 12
5.
1
=-
D
3 12
1.
3 9
--=-
4 D
2.
2 6
=-
3 D
3.
2 =-
4
5 D
4.
3 6
=-
6 D
5.
1 3
=-
3 D
3 D
5 10
He draws this model.
Change Mark's model to find the answer. Write the missing number
in the box.
N
M
Cl
N
.......
rt'I
Qj
"8
~
OJ
c:
::::;
....
OJ
.0
E
::::I
Z
rt'I
c:
0
III
III
~
0 0
W
. LL
.r
Name Date------------
------------------------
- I
o
+ I·
1
We can make this model show the equivalent fraction 6/10 by partitioning
(breaking) each 1/5 into 2 pieces.
3/5
-Io +
6/10
1
1
·
Use the models below to find as many other equivalent fractions as you can by
partitioning the 3/5 model. Write the name of each new fraction that you make.
3
- 1 5
o 1
3
-Io 1·
1
5
3
- 1 5
o 1
3
-Io 1 · 5
-
1
3
- 1 5
o 1
3
- 1 1 · 5
o 1
Look at all the equivalent fraction pairs that you created. What patterns do you
notice?
How are the number line and area models the same?
1. ++-- 01______
+ _--+--~I' - -
o 1
2. ++--01----+-----+-+1.
o 1
3. ++--01~~______
+ ~I'
o 1
4.
°1
o
+ 1 ·
1
5.
°1 + 1 ·
- -
o 1
4
5
Could you find an equivalent fraction WITHOUT drawing an area model or a
number line? How?
Which do you like better- the area model or the number line? Why?
I Halves I -Io 1·
1
I Thirds I -Io 1
1
·
I Fourths I -Io 1 ·
1
I Fifths I - 1 1 ·
o 1
I Sixths I -Io I I I I I 1 ·
1
I Eighths I -I
0
I I I I I I I 1 ·
1
I Tenths I -I
0
I I I I I I I I I 1 ·
1
I Twelfths I -1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ·
0 1
Lesson 4(1 day)
Learning Goal: Students will find missing numerators and denominators in equivalent
fraction pairs using number lines. (Goal to post for students: Today we will use number lines to find
missing numerators and denominators). In this lesson, the teacher will challenge students to use
number lines to find missing numerators or denominators in equivalent fraction pairs. As a class, they
will review the patterns and strategies they have discovered in previous and move further towards
formalizing the written algorithm.
Introduction: Introduce the lesson by stating, "Yesterday we used number lines to create
equivalent fractions; today we are going to use number lines to find missing numerators and
denominators. We did this a few days ago with our area models. We might find that some of those
strategies will be helpful today." Show students the number line of2/3** and ask:
• Can you make this number line show sixths? How?
• Ifwe make sixths with this number line, what fraction do we have now?
Have students think a few minutes and then do a "tum and talk" or a "think-pair-share." Gather some
student thoughts then introduce the task for the day with the student worksheet. **
Student Work Time: Students should work on the student worksheet while the teacher
circulates.
Possible scaffolding:
o Students with fine motor issues might need additional supports as it might be hard to
segment the unit fractions with equal spacing accurately enough to get accurate answers;
these students could be provided with pre-segmented number lines on transparencies that
could be placed over the existing number line.
o Color coding the fraction lines might also be helpful- i.e., halves in red, fourths in blue-
this helps students distinguish and emphasizes equivalency (when one point gets two
colors it represents equivalent fractions).
Possible extensions: refer to the Challenge Ideas Outline. **
Group Discussion: The goal of the group discussion in Lesson 4 is to get students to use number
lines to help them solve problems when either the numerator or denominator is missing, to compare and
contrast the number lines and area models, and to move further towards the written algorithm. Guiding
questions should build on the students' understanding from previous lessons but could include:
• How did you use the number lines to help you?
• What was different about the problems today than the problems yesterday? Did you
think about them differently? Did you change your strategy at all? How?
• How was solving these problems with number lines the same or different than the area
models?
• Can we solve these problems without using a model? How?
Independent Practice Time: For the independent work time, any worksheets that provide
equivalent fraction problems with missing numerators and denominators can be used. HOWEVER,
students should be asked to draw number lines for some if not all of the problems. Students who clearly
understand the connection between the number line and the algorithm should not be required to do all
problems with number lines but should be asked to draw one to support/prove/justify their use of the
algorithm for 2 - 3 problems.
4FEO Lesson 4 Outline 3/20/12
Check for Understanding: Exit Ticket: one possible exit ticket option could be: "Jake needs
to solve the following problem: 3/5 = xllO. He thinks that he can figure this out without drawing a
number line or area model. How might he do this?"**
""
OJ
."
0
::?!
......
""N
OJ
C
~
....
OJ
.c
E
::>
Z
<I'
c
0
'"'"OJ
0
...J
0
w
u.
<I'
Name Date
Use the number lines to find the missing numerators. Write the missing numbers
in the boxes.
1. 1 D
=-
· 1
0
+ 1
1
·
3 6
2. 1 D
=-
· 1
0
+ 1
1
·
2 8
3.
2 D
=-
· 1
0
+ 1
1
·
5 10
4.
3 D
--=-
·1o + 1 ·
1 4 12
5.
4
--=-
D
·1o + 1 ·
1 6 12
6. . . . -.1----+-----------+----t--+I. 2 4
=-
o 1 3 D
7.
1 4
=-
·1o + 1 ·
1 2 D
8.
2 6
=-
·1o + 1 ·
1 4 D
9. CHALLENGE
9 18
·1o I + I
=-
1 ·
1 12 D
10. CHALLENGE
2 6
=-
D
. 1
1 · 8
o 1
1 D
--
3 6
He thinks that he can figure this out without drawing a number line
or area model. How might he do this?
If a student has earlier made this hypothesis the class should be asked to consider the statement and
determine whether they agree with it or not. Guiding questions could include:
• Cayla made an observation earlier about the number of new pieces and the "multiplier" in
the fraction pairs. Do you agree with her statement? Why or why not?
• Is this statement true for all of the problems that we solved over the last few days? Look
through your work to see if the number of new pieces in each unit fraction is the same as
the number we could use as the "multiplier."
• I'm going to write a fraction on the board without an area model or number line. Can
anyone create an equivalent fraction without having a model? How did you do this
without a model?
• What if! give you a missing numerator problem like this? How could we find the
missing numerator without using a model?
• When we were simply finding any equivalent fraction we could multiply the numerator
and denominator by any number, as long as we used the same number for both. Can we
still do that with missing numerator/denominator problems? Why not?
• How could we write these steps in words? How would we show these steps with
numbers only?
By the end of the discussion the class should have generated a written/verbal rule as well as examples
with numbers only and students should be ready to practice the algorithm independently.
Independent Practice: Any worksheets in which students need to generate equivalent fractions
or find missing numerators or denominators can be used. Students should be asked to show an area
model for 1 - 2 problems and a number line model for 1 - 2 problems.
4FEO Lesson 5 Outline 3/20/12
Possible scaffolding: students who need support should have worksheets with simpler problems
with a few examples worked. They should also be provided with step-by-step guides** such as the
samples included with this lesson. Ideally the step-by-step guides will reflect the thinking/language that
the class created as a group.
Possible Extensions: all students should be asked to demonstrate mastery of the algorithm as part
of today' s independent practice, but stronger students could be given more challenging fractions. Also,
these students could continue with any challenge work they began throughout the module as per the
samples provided on the Challenge Ideas Outline**.
Check for Understanding: as this lesson wraps up the lessons on equivalent fractions, the exit
ticket should give students an opportunity to reflect on what they've learned and, most importantly,
about what they are still confused. This will be important information for the teacher as the next step is
the formative assessment on equivalence; if students demonstrate continued confusion some
differentiated student work time should be provided.
Work with a partner. Create an example that shows that 1/2 can be
greater than 1/2. You can draw a picture or write in words.
Challenge question: Can 1/25 be greater than 1/27 Can 1/456 be greater than 1/27 Can
you make a fraction so small that it can NEVER be greater than 1/27
1) Sam ate ~ of his pizza and Sara ate ~ of her pizza. Sam said that he ate
4 4
more pizza than Sara. Use pictures and words to explain how Sam could be
correct.
Is she right? _ _ _ _ _ __
1) 30_2
4 4
2) 10 2
3 3
3) 30 5
6 6
4) 50 7
8 8
5) 30 8
10
4 FEO Lesson 10 Student Worksheet 4/10/12
10
Name Date- - - -
-----------------------
Part 2: Look at each fraction pair. Use> or < to show which fraction is
greater. You can use models or number lines to help you.
6) -20 2
4 8
o~
7) 1
3
8) 3
6
o 3
5
9) 40 4
6 8
10)
I have 3 pieces in
each fraction ...
2/3 1/3
I have 3 pieces
shaded ...
3/4
1) 10 2
4 4
2) 20 2
3 6
3) 20 4
6 6
4)
5) 40 5
10 10
4 FEO Lesson 10 Independent Practice Set 4/10/12
6)
7) 10 1
5 7
8) 60 9
12 12
9)
10) 30 5
6 6
Use <, >, or = to compare each fraction pair. Use a model or words to show your thinking.
~O~
2 3
2
~O~
3 6
3
-30
4
-5
10
4
~02..
4 8
5
-20
12
-
7
10
6
2..02-
4 8
1) Sheila wanted to compare 1/3 and 4/6 on ONE number line ... she started with this number line:
. I
o
+ I·
1
She wants to place 4/6 on the same number line to be able to compare; how can she determine where
4/6 belongs? Show your work on the number line above and explain how you found 4/6.
2) Jack wanted to compare 3/4 and 7/8 by drawing an area model. He started by drawing 3/4:
How can he change the model to show eighths? Show your work on the model above and explain how
you can use this to determine whether 3/4 or 7/8 is greater.
Use <, >, or =to compare each fraction pair. Use any strategy that you like;
20 4 10 2 10 1
5 5 2 3 2 8
20 7
5 8
4 0 2 30 5 50 4
8 5 4 6 8 5
20 7
3 10
4 FEO Lesson 11 Student Worksheet 4/10/12
Exit Ticket
Think about the strategies for comparing fractions that were shared
today.
What was one strategy that you want to learn more about?
20 4 10 2 10 1
5 5 2 3 2 8
20 7
5 8
4 0 2 30 5 50 4
8 5 4 6 8 5
50 6
12 12
What was one strategy that you want to learn more about?
Problem 1:
- 1
I 1 ·
0 1
Problem 2:
~
- 1
I 1
0 1
Problem 3:
-I0
I 1
1
·
Problem 4:
-I0
I 1
1
·
Problem 5:
- 1
I 1 ·
0 1
Problem 6:
- 1
I 1 ·
0 1
Problem 7:
~
- 1
I 1
0 1
Problem 8:
- 1
I 1 ·
0 1
20 4 10 4 10 1
5 5 3 6 2 8
20 7
4 8
50 2 30 2
8 5 4 6
70 4 50 7
12 10 12 12
50~
8 6
I I I
I I I I
Compare these two fractions by using the number lines.
20~
3 5
. I
o
I·
1
. I
o
I·
1
1. Mary drew a model of 1/3. She wants to use this model to make an equivalent fraction using sixths.
2 2x2
3 = 3x2
I Model A I I Model B I
I I I I
n n
I I I I I I I I I I
Part A: Answer: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
3/20/2012 1
3. Sue started with this area model.
OJ]
Part A: What fraction does this model represent? _ _ __
Part B: Change Sue's model to show a different equivalent fraction. What fraction does the model
show now? _ _ _ _ _ _ __
5. Part A: Use the number line to find the missing numerator. Make sure to show your work.
3 D
4 12
4
I 1/4 2/4
+
3/4
I
~
0 1
3/20/2012 2
4th Grade Fraction Equivalence and Ordering Module
Formative Assessment- Fraction Equivalence
Annotated Answer Key
Question 1
Concept Addressed: Generate equivalent fractions using visual models
~--+-------ll I I I I I I I NZN
Part B: Students must indicate "2/6" or "two-sixths" in their answer.
Notes to Teacher
The work in lesson 2 supports this concept.
Question 2
Concept Addressed: The equation alb =(n x a)/(n x b) corresponds to physically partitioning of each
unit fraction piece into n smaller pieces
Answer(s) and Exemplar Student Responses
Part A: Model A
Part B: Explanations should reflect the understanding that 2/3 =(2 x 2)/(2 x 3) corresponds to
physically partitioning each third into two equal pieces.
Exemplar reflecting full understanding: "Model A shows the equation because the "x2/1 in the
fraction means that each part was broken into 2 equal pieces. In Model B, the pieces are broken into 3
pieces. The equation for that model would show "x3/1 in the fraction./I
Exemplar reflecting partial understanding: "Model A shows the equation because each part
was broken into 2 equal pieces. In Model 8, the pieces are broken into 3 pieces./I (no connection
between the model and the equation)
Notes to Teacher
The work in lessons 1-5, but specifically lesson 5, supports this concept. The Progressions for the
Common Core Standards in Mathematics 3-5 Number and Operations-Fractions states that students
should "see that the numerical process of multiplying the numerator and denominator of a fraction by
the same number, n, corresponds physically to partitioning each unit fraction piece into n smaller equal
pieces. The whole is then partitioned into n times as many pieces, and there are n times as many
smaller unit fraction pieces as in the original fraction."
3/20/12
Question 3
Concept Addressed: Generate equivalent fractions using visual models
Answer(s) and Exemplar Student Responses
Part A: Student work should say "3/4" or "three-fourths."
Part B: The model should be partitioned in any mathematically correct way (allows a moargin of
error for line spacing) and the answer should match with the partitioning.
Notes to Teacher
The work in Lesson 1 supports this concept.
Question 4
Concept Addressed: Generate equivalent fractions and explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a
fraction (n x a)/(n x b) using visual models
Answer(s) and Exemplar Student Responses
Part A: any fraction that is equivalent to 3/5.
Part B: Work shown can include a visual model, a number line, or algorithmic numerical work
that supports the answer. Examples could include but are not limited to:
mE 3/5 = 6/10
.1I
0
I I I I 3/5+ I I
6/10
Notes to Teacher
The work in Lessons 1 - 5 supports this concept.
Question 5
Concept Addressed: Generate equivalent fractions using number lines.
Answer(s) and Exemplar Student Responses
Part A: The number "9" should be indicated. Work shown can include partitioning ofthe
number line and/or use of the written algorithm.
Notes to Teacher
The work in Lesson 4 supports this concept.
3/20/12
4th Grade Fraction Equivalence and Ordering Module
Formative Assessment- Fraction Ordering
Annotated Answer Key
Question 1
Concept Addressed: Generate equivalent fractions and explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a
fraction (n x a)/(n x b) using number lines.
Question 2
Concept Addressed: Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators by
creating common denominators or numerators and justify the conclusions using a visual fraction
model. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <.
Answer's} and Exemplar Student Responses
Part A: A mathematically correct model such as (but not limited to) the models below:
4
6
~
- 4- = -8-
6
10
12
.. II I I II I I.N
, I +I
10/12
I •
12 "---y--J o 1
Fig 3 Comparison on a number line
10
Fig. 1 Comparison of two wholes 12
Fig 2 Comparison on the same
whole
2/12/12 1
Part B: Explanations should be mathematically correct and should support the model drawn. A
full explanation should reflect the understanding that the greater fraction is the one that represents
more pieces of equal sized wholes (Figure 2), more pieces of the same whole (Figure 2), or a point to
the right of another point on a number line (Figure 3). Explanations must also include a correct
mathematical comparison using> or < symbols.
Notes to Teacher
The work in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ supports this concept.
Question 3
Concept Addressed: Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators by
comparing to a benchmark number such as 1 whole and justify the conclusions. Record the results of
comparisons with symbols >, =, or <.
Answer's) and Exemplar Student Responses
The explanation should describe a correct mathematical strategy that uses 1 to compare % and
9/10. One possible strategy is to recognize that % lacks ~ to make 1 whole; 9/10 lacks 1/10 to make 1
whole. The fraction 1/10 is smaller than ~, so 9/10 is therefore closer to 1 whole.
Exemplar reflecting full understanding: "Mary can think about which fraction is closer to 1
whole. Nine tenths is 1/10 away from one whole; % is U away. One tenth is smaller than U so 9/10 >
%."
Exemplar reflecting partial understanding: "Nine tenths is the greater fraction. (no
II
Notes to Teacher
The work in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ supports this concept.
Question 4
Concept Addressed: Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators by
creating common denominators or numerators and justify the conclusions using a number line. Record
the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <.
.I
3/4
0
t
Comparing on a number line
+
7/8 I
1
~
2/12/12 2
Part B: Explanations should be mathematically correct and should support the model drawn. A
full explanation should reflect the understanding that 7/8 is greater than % because it represents a
point to the right of the point 3/4 on the number line. Explanations must also include a correct
mathematical comparison using> or < symbols.
Exemplar reflecting full understanding: 1/7/8> %. I found 7/8 by breaking the fourths into two
pieces so I would have eighths. Then I found 7/8 on the number line. I know that 7/8 is to the right of %
so it is greater./I
Exemplar reflecting partial understanding: 1/7/8> %. I found 7/8 on the number line./I (no
explanation of how eighths were found nor that 7/8 is to the right of 3/4).
Notes to Teacher
The work in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ supports this concept.
2/12/12 3
-.
4th Grade Fraction Equivalence and Ordering (4.NF.l and 4.NF.2)
Formative Assessment Fraction Ordering DRAFT
.I o
1/5 2/5 3/5 4/5 I
1
2. Part A: In the space below, draw a model to determine which is greater: 10/12 or 4/6.
Part B: Explain your answer using the model above. Make sure to include a mathematical statement
that uses> or < to compare the two fractions.
2/12/2012 1
3. Mary says she can use 1 as a benchmark fraction to determine which is greater- 3/4 or 9/10.
Describe how Mary can use 1 to determine which fraction is greater. Make sure to include a
mathematical statement that uses> or < to compare the two fractions in your answer.
4. Part A: Use the number line below to determine which is greater- 7/8 or 3/4.
.I 3/4
I·
o 1
Part B: Explain your answer using the model above. Make sure to include a mathematical statement
that uses> or < to compare the two fractions.
2/12/2012 2
4th Grade Fraction Equivalence and Ordering (4.NF.l and 4.NF.21
Summative Assessment DRAFT
o
I I
1
2
o
I I
1
I
2 3
I I
1
4 ""4 """"4
I
o 2
I I
3
I
4 I I
6
I
7
I
1
8 ""8 8 ""8 s- a ""8
Answer - - - - - is equivalent to
1/25/2012 1
3. Mike made 3 equal"jumps" on a number line and landed here:
o
I·
1
Mary says she can make the same point show the fraction 6/8.
.I
o
I·
1
Part A: Change the number line model above so that the point represents the fraction 6/8.
1/2S/2012 2
4. Look at the two models below. Write the fraction shown by each model.
I Fraction _ __
I Fraction, _ __
1 lx2
-
4 4x2
Part A: In the space below, draw a model or a number line that represents this equation.
Answer - - - - - - - -
1/25/2012 3
6. Mary says that the fractions 4/5 and 8/10 are equivalent.
Is she correct?_ _ _ _ _ _ __
7. John says the fraction 1/2 is a/ways bigger than the fraction}t Which model below shows that John
is wrong?
Model A Model B
1/25/2012 4
8. Use the number line below to determine which is greater- % or 5/8.
.I
o
I·
1
Explain your answer. Make sure to include a mathematical statement that uses> or < to compare the
two fractions.
9. Which model below will help Mary determine whether 2/3 is bigger than 3/57
Model A Model B
2 2
3 3
_3_ 3
t--t--'-It--+--t 5 5
1/25/2012 5
10. Mike says he can use Yz as a benchmark fraction to determine which is greater- 5/8 or 4/10.
Describe how Mike can use Yz to determine which is greater. Make sure to include a mathematical
statement that uses> or < to compare the two fractions.
1/25/2012 6