IT-110 INTEGRATIVE PROGRAMMING AND TECHNOLOGIES 1 ASSESSMENT 3 Second Semester, SY 2023-2024
Case Analysis: Software Security Practices of Most Used Applications
Objective: Assess the security practices of the most used application in the Philippines to find potential problems and areas for improvement. Instruction:
• Each group should have a minimum of 3 members and a maximum of 5.
• Choose an application: Discuss and select a widely used application in the Philippines. Assess its features and any reported security issues. • Security Analysis: The analysis will be divided into three (3) sections focusing on key security areas (e.g., user authentication, data security, network security). • Group Report: Make a brief report of your analysis. Include the chosen application, significant findings, identified threats, and suggestions for improvements. Prepare a short presentation to discuss your group's results with the class. • The findings of your reports should be printed on an A4 size paper, font is CAMBRIA size 12. • The activity is worth 100 points. The 70 points will be given by the instructor and the 30 points will come from the leader of each group. The leader of each group would grade their members based on their performance during the activity. Analysis Steps: 1. User Authentication and Authorization: • How does the app manage user registration and login? 2. Data Security • Are there any concerns about data leakage or unauthorized access? 3. Network Security • What communication protocols are used by the application? (e.g., HTTPS, secure data transfer). Does the application have any known vulnerabilities related to network communication? Group Evaluation Rubric (30 points)
points) points) Effort Produced Fully prepared; Minimal Little or no additional completed all preparation; evidence of resources for the agreed tasks; superficial preparation; no group; competent, but knowledge of effort shown extraordinary not extraordinary resources; effort minimal effort demonstrated Attitude Exceptionally Positive, Neutral; neither Disparaging; positive and supportive, encouraging nor negative, constructive; mostly discouraging; withdrawn, or encourages other constructive, and disinterested in belligerent; group members upbeat the performance absent of others Contribution Outstanding Good quality Poor quality work; Poor quality; contribution; work; few substantive little, if any, above and beyond; revisions or errors; much contribution to work is excellent additions are revision and group goals in form and necessary editing are substance required
Group Members Effort Attitude Contribution Total
Narrative and Documentation Report Rubrics (70 pts.)
Criteria Excellent Fair Poor
✓ The content is ✓ Major points are ✓ Content is comprehensive addressed, but not incomplete. and accurate. well supported. ✓ Major points ✓ The content ✓ Report is inadequate are not clear and purpose of or does not address and /or Content and the writing are course concepts. persuasive. development clear. ✓ Content is (25 pts) (40 points) (40 pts.) inconsistent concerning purpose and clarity of thought. (30-35 pts.) Republic of the Philippines CENTRAL BICOL STATE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE Impig, Sipocot, Camarines Sur 4408 Website: www.cbsua.edu.ph Email Address: [email protected]
Trunkline: (054) 881-6681
✓ Logical ✓ The organization is ✓ No
progression of clear. Transitions are discernable ideas with a present. organization. Organization clear structure (15-18 pts.) Transitions and that enhances are not Structure the thesis. present. (20 points) Transitions are (10 pts.) mature and graceful. (20 pts.) Grammar, ✓ Punctuation, ✓ A few errors in ✓ Distracting punctuation, spelling, and punctuation, errors in and spelling capitalization spelling, and punctuation, (10 points) are correct. No capitalization. spelling, and errors. (5-8 pts) capitalization. (10 pts.) (2-4 pts.)
Prepared by:
GEREMY B. ARCINO COS Instructor
Recommending Approval: Approved by:
GILDA J. TAUPA DENNIS C. GABON
Program Chairperson Dean, College of Information Technology