Drugs
Drugs
DOI: 10.5923/j.phr.20160602.01
1
Dept of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
2
Dept of Nursing, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
3
Dept of Nursing, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Nigeria
4
Dept of Nursing, College of Medical Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
Abstract Drug Abuse is becoming an increasing problem in Nigeria. This study sought to determine the prevalence of
drug abuse among students in a tertiary institution in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. The study adopted a descriptive survey
design. The sample size for this study was 800 students (n=800). Structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Three
research questions and one hypothesis was answered. Descriptive statistics and Pearson product moment correlation were
used for data analysis using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS). Results showed that majority of the
respondents were young people within the age group of 20-25 years and a higher proportion of respondents were male
students. This study reveals that 46.6% of the sample respondents have taken drugs for non-medical purposes at least once.
Coffee and alcohol were the most commonly abused drugs. Majority of the respondents agreed that students take drugs as a
result of poor teacher-student relationship, improper parental upbringing, as well as the influence of peer pressure. Results
also revealed that the null hypothesis which states that there is no significant relationship between university environment and
drug abuse among UNIBEN students is rejected while the alternate hypothesis is upheld. It is therefore recommended that
Public health intervention aimed at preventing drug use among students should be designed to raise awareness about the
negative effects of drug abuse.
Keywords Prevalence, Drug abuse, Students
Ethical consideration: A permit was obtained from the sample while females in the sample were 44.3 per cent as
chairman of research committee, university of Benin and shown in table 3.
informed consent from all respondents. The questionnaires
Table 4. Frequency distribution of students’ level
were clearly explained to the selected students before and
during the process of answering them. Level Frequency Percentage (%)
100 24 3.0
200 144 18.0
2. Results
300 258 32.3
The result from table 1 indicates that four faculties 400 290 36.3
participated in the prevalence of drug abuse among students 500 84 10.5
in university of Benin survey, the four faculties have equal
Total 800 100
number of respondents. The information is presented
graphically in table 2. The respondents (students) are between one hundred (first
Table 1. Frequency distribution of sampled students in each faculty year) and five hundred level (fifth year), but the four hundred
level students (fourth year) formed the bulk of the subjects
Faculty Frequency Percentage (%)
used for the study (36.3%), the group with the smallest
Law 200 25.0 number of participants is one hundred level students (3.0%)
Basic medical sciences 200 25.0 as shown in table 4.
Social science 200 25.0 Table 5. Frequency distribution of students’ age
Engineering 200 25.0
Age Frequency Percentage (%)
Total 800 100
Less than 20 years 175 21.9
fifty one 351 (43.9%) have taken drugs other than for Results in table 10 reveals that majority of the respondents
medical purpose. 411 (51.4%) have not taken while 38 (4.8%) ticked “no” to items “1 to 5”. Are these drugs in readily
students did not respond to the item. Therefore 46.6% of the available in the school? (55.5%); Have you been taken drugs
sample respondents have at one time or the other used drugs before gaining admission into the university? (71.9%); did
for non-medical purposes. you start taking drugs when you gained entry (admission)
into the university? (79.6%); has the university environment
Table 7. Prevalence rate of drug abuse
influenced you in the use of drugs? (79.9%) and is drug
Question Yes No
No abuse common in your faculty? (72.1%). The large number
response of persons who disagreed to the items show that accessibility
Have you ever used drugs 351 411
38 (4.8%)* to drug is low within the school environment. This implies
for non-medical purposes (43.9%) (51.4%) that the rate of drug abuse among UNIBEN students is high.
*figures in parenthesis are in parentages Furthermore table 9 reveals the drugs commonly abused by
students.
Result in table 8 reveals that majority of the respondents
(82.0%) did not respond to the item measuring the duration Research question two
of drug abuse, 77.08% of respondents who responded to the ● Which types of drugs are commonly abused by the
item have been taking drug for less than four years, while students?
12.5% have taken drug more than four to five years and only To answer this research question the frequency count and
10.41% have taken drug more than six years and above. The percentage of students’ response was analysed and presented
large percentage of respondents who have taken drug less in table 8.
than four years could be subjects with a four year academic Table 12 reveals that out of the eight (8) commonly abused
programme on the average. substance/drugs, the rate of abuse varies. Students seem to
Result in table 9 shows that majority of the respondents abuse the following type of drugs respectively: Coffee 294
disagreed to item “1 and 3”. “Is any member of your family a (36.8%); Alcohol 237 (29.6%); Spirit 237 (29.6%); Kola nut
drug abuser?” (69.1%), Have you engaged in illegal 128 (16.0%); Cigarette 103 (12.9); tobacco 84 (10.5%);
activities to obtain any drugs? (82.9%) while 59.6% agreed Marijuana (Weed) 78 (9.8%) and Cocaine 52 (6.5%). The
to “item 2” Do you feel normal /okay when some drugs are result presented is from a sample of 800 students, but only
not at your reach? This implies that the factors that instigate 300 students responded to the items while about 500 students
students to take drugs are external or environmental, coupled did not tick so show their agreement or disagreement.
with ease of access.
Table 8. Shows duration of drug abuse by the students: Frequency and percentages were used to answer this research question
Duration of drug abuse Less than four years Four to five years Six years and above No response
For how long have you been using the drugs? 111 (13.9%) 18 (2.3%) 15 (1.9%) 656 (82.0%)
1 Is any member of your family a drug abuser? 214 (26.8%) 553 (69.1%) 33 (4.1%)
2 Do you feel normal/okay when some drugs are not at your reach? 477 (59.6%) 250 (31.3%) 73 (9.1%)
3 Have you engaged in illegal activities to obtain any drugs? 103 (12.9%) 663 (82.9%) 34 (4.3%)
1 Are these drugs in readily available in the school? 286 (35.8%) 444 (55.5%) 70 (8.8%)
5 Is drug abuse common in your faculty? 166 (20.8%) 577 (72.1%) 57 (7.1%)
Public Health Research 2016, 6(2): 31-37 35
Table 11. Frequency of commonly abused drugs among the university students
Table 12. Frequency of factors influencing drug consumption among the university students
NO
STATEMENT (FACTORS) SA A D SD
RESPONSE
Students take drugs to increase intelligence 118 (14.8%) 205 (25.6%) 259 (32.4%) 173 (21.6%) 45 (5.6%)
Most students take drugs out of curiosity 198 (24.8%) 358 (44.8%) 173 (21.6%) 34 (4.3%) 37 (4.6%)
People abuse drugs because they have a lot of pocket money 86 (10.8%) 246 (30.8%) 296 (37.0%) 120 (15.0%) 52 (6.5%)
The availability of drugs can lead to its abuse 293 (36.6%) 297 (37.1%) 139 (17.4%) 25 (3.1%) 46 (5.8%)
Poor teachers/parental example and upbringing could be a
355 (44.4%) 338 (42.3%) 41 (5.1%) 22 (2.8%) 44 (5.5%)
cause to make students abuse drugs
Peer group/peer pressure is capable of influencing student
461 (57.6%) 217 (27.1%) 57 (7.1%) 21 (2.6%) 44 (5.5%)
into taking of drugs
Students take drugs out of frustration 223 (27.9%) 312 (39.0%) 156 (19.5%) 58 (7.3%) 51 (6.4%)
Table 13. Frequency of “peer influence amongst the students in the consumption of drugs?”
Research question three (84.7%) and Students take drugs out of frustration “535”
(66.9%).
● What are the factors that influence students into taking
The respondents sampled showed disagreement (SD & D)
of these drugs? To answer this research question the
to the following items: students abuse drugs to increase
frequency count and percentage of students’ response
intelligence“432” (54.0%), People abuse drugs because they
was analyzed and presented in table 12.
have a lot of pocket money“416” (52.0%). In furtherance,
Table 12 reveals the factors influencing drug abuse among Table 13 explains peer influence on drug abuse among the
the university students. Students seem to show agreement university students.
(SA & A ) to the following as potent factors in drug abuse Table 13 reveals students response in relation to peer
amongst the university students: Most students take drugs influence on drug use and types of drug. Majority of the
out of curiosity “556” (69.6%), The availability of drugs can respondents agreed that (always or occasionally) friends
lead to its abuse “590” (73.7%), Poor teachers/parental encourage them to take: Coffee 535(66.9%); Alcohol 533
example/ improper upbringing could be a factor in students (66.7%); Cigarette 344 (57.1%); Marijuana (weed) 418
abuse drugs “693” (86.7%), Peer group/peer pressure is (52.2%) and Kola nut 411 (51.4%).
capable of influencing student into taking of drugs“678” Majority of the students seem to show disagreement
36 Adeyemo Florence O. et al.: Prevalence of Drug Abuse Amongst University Students in Benin City, Nigeria
(never or no response) to the taking of the following drug also showed that 7 out of 10 undergraduate students had
type: Cocaine 421 (52.6%), Tobacco 421 (56.2%) and Spirit used drugs in the past [the commonest was alcohol (58%)].
514 (54.3%). Coffee and alcohol were the most commonly abused drugs
(36.8%) and (29.6%) respectively, this is however consistent
with finding from advisory council on the misuse of drugs
3. Hypothesis (2006) that says alcohol is the most popular drug misused by
young people. Only very few respondents abuse cocaine
There is no significant relationship between university (6.5%), this is similar to the finding by Adelekan (1999) who
environment and drug abuse among the university students. showed that the consumption of cocaine amongst youths in
The independent variable in this hypothesis is university rural area was quite low.
environment while the dependent variable is drug abuse, The study explained that majority of respondents did not
Pearson product moment was used to analyse the data respond to this question, but 77.08% of respondents who
collected and presented in table 14. responded to the item have been taking drug for less than
Table 14. Pearson product moment correlation between university four years. This is in line with the study conducted by the
environment and drug abuse National Survey on Drug Use and Health (Andrews et al.,
Variable N Mean SD r-value Sig. 2001) which revealed that more than half of the students in
University
the U.S tried an illegal drug before they graduated from high
800 15.82 3.31 0.713 .000 school.
environment (x)
Drug abuse (y) 800 18.04 4.55
Majority of the respondents agreed that students take
drugs as a result of poor teacher/ parental upbringing and
*significant at 0.05 level; df = 798; critical r-value = 0.170 also the influence of peer pressure, this correlates with
The result in table 14 reveals that the calculated r – value studies conducted by Maithya (2009) and Kiiru (2004) which
of 0.713* is greater than the critical r-value of 0.170 at .05 showed that some students take drugs as a result of poor
level of significance with 798 degree of freedom with this teacher/parental role modelling and influence of peer
result, the null hypothesis which states that there is no pressure respectively.
significant relationship between university environment and Lastly, result also revealed that the null hypothesis which
drug abuse among the university students is rejected while states that there is no significant relationship between
the alternate hypothesis is upheld. university environment and drug abuse amongst university
students in Benin is rejected while the alternate hypothesis is
upheld. This implies that, there is significant relationship
4. Discussion of Findings between university environment and drug abuse amongst the
university students especially those residents in the school
Eight hundred students from four faculties and sixteen hostels.
departments (four departments in each faculty) were
randomly selected to participate in this study. Majority of the
respondents are Christians followed by Muslim and African 5. Conclusions
traditional religion respectively. Majority of the respondents
The study shows that an average number of students
were young people within the age group of 20-25 years
(43.9%) in University of Benin were exposed to drugs.
which is in line with the findings of Nevadomsky (1985) and
Alcohol and coffee were the most commonly abused drugs
in contrast with findings from the study conducted by Otiena
and the least was cocaine. There is an increasing trend in
(2009) and Odejide (2000) which reported mean age of most
Nigeria and other developing countries. Also students have
respondents (drug abusers) to be about 18 years respectively.
difficulties stopping habitual use of alcohol. Most students
The study also revealed that a higher proportion of
abuse drugs as a result of poor teacher/parental upbringing
respondents were male students and this suggests that the
and also the influence of peer pressure. There is need for
compulsive use of drugs is associated majorly with male
early intervention that targets tertiary school students. More
gender which is in line with the study of Enakpoya (2009).
students should be made to develop drug abuse prevention
The gender differences in drug abuse are said to have their
strategies that target students at high risk. Appropriate
foundation in the very first stage of drug involvement and the
intervention, health education efforts, support and referral
opportunity to use the drugs. If given the opportunity to use
system should be established in tertiary institution to help
the drugs, male and female are equally likely to use them
curb this habit and counseling programmes be incorporated
(Anthony et al., 1999).
into the Universities health care system (Kiiru, 2004).
The result of this study further reveals that 43.9% of the
sample respondents have in one time taken drugs for reasons
other than for medical purposes which is an upsurge as 6. Recommendations
compared to the study conducted by Maithya (2009) which
showed that 29.6% students reported drug use other than for The following recommendations were made on the basis
medical purposes. Singh and Singh (1979) in their findings of the findings of this study:
Public Health Research 2016, 6(2): 31-37 37