Report Celent Na Policy Administration Systems 2020 Property Casualty Edition 202006
Report Celent Na Policy Administration Systems 2020 Property Casualty Edition 202006
Report Celent Na Policy Administration Systems 2020 Property Casualty Edition 202006
This is an authorized excerpt from a Celent report profiling Policy Administration vendors. The reprint was prepared
for Guidewire but the analysis has not been changed. For more information about the full report, please contact
Celent at [email protected].
CONTENTS
This report provides an overview of the policy administration systems available in North
America for property and casualty insurance carriers. The report profiles 31 policy
administration solutions, providing an overview of their functionality, customer base, lines
of business supported, technology, implementation, pricing, and support. Of those
solutions, 14 qualified for Celent’s ABCD rankings. Their profiles include customer
references and a Celent opinion of the solution. Those solutions are also ranked in the
ABCD Vendor View. Another 20 solutions did not qualify to be ranked in the ABCD
Vendor View, and those profiles do not include a customer reference or a Celent opinion.
Some vendors also appear in companion reports profiling these systems in Asia Pacific,
Europe/Middle East/Africa, and Latin America. Vendors that qualified are ranked in the
ABCD Vendor View grids.
This report is part of a series on policy administration systems (PAS) in North America,
Latin America, EMEA, and the Asia-Pacific. It profiles the majority of the property
casualty policy administration systems available in North America today. It uses Celent’s
ABCD vendor view, which is our standard representation of a vendor marketplace,
designed to show at a glance the relative positions of each vendor in four categories:
Advanced Technology, Breadth of Functionality, Customer Base, and Depth of Client
Services. Insurers should consider which of these factors are most important to them and
review the detailed profiles in this report to assess vendor suitability.
This report includes 14 systems that fully met the inclusion criteria for Celent’s ABCD
Vendor View as described in the “Report Methodology” section of this report. It also
profiles 17 additional vendors that did not meet the ABCD criteria. These vendors are
either new market entrants or, for a variety of reasons, did not fully meet the inclusion
criteria.
This report should help insurers define their core systems requirements and, where
appropriate, create a short list of vendors for evaluation. Expanded PAS functionality and
improved technology mean that insurers continue to have a wide spectrum of systems
and vendors to consider when they are looking for a solution to fit their needs. Insurers
should leverage their access to the authors through analyst access calls to learn more
about the vendors.
Chapter: Introduction
2
POLICY ADMINISTRATION SYSTEMS: DEFINITION AND
FUNCTIONALITY
DEFINITION
In one sense, the definition of a policy administration system (PAS) is very simple—it is
the system of record for all policies that an insurance company has written. At this most
basic level, a PAS is a repository of policy-level data related to objects of insurance,
coverages, limits, conditions, exclusions, duration of the policy, endorsements, and so
forth. A permanent policy record is created at the time a policy is issued, and it includes
the complete history of the policy through renewal, termination, cancellation, and/or
reinstatement.
Quick quote and full quote. Agents and underwriters often want to get a quick
indication of risk acceptability and price and to compare the price of different options.
Quick quote functionality allows a price to be generated with minimal data entry. The data
entry screen contains only those questions needed to calculate a rate or to determine the
basic terms and conditions of the policy. Sometimes the questions will include basic risk
acceptability questions, but quick quote is not usually intended to handle the full
underwriting of the policy. Many solutions support dynamic questions that expand and
change based on the answers to specific questions, allowing the system to prompt the
broker or underwriter to get more detailed information based on insured’s responses.
Multiple versions of the quote can be generated to see the impact of different terms,
conditions, and product choices. Some solutions handle side-by-side quoting by opening
separate windows. Some allow different quote versions to be saved. More and more are
offering side-by-side quoting in a single window. Once a quote is generated, some
solutions allow for multiple side-by-side views of different options. The user can change a
3
deductible in version one, or a limit in version two. Some solutions use drop downs to
show the different available options, with the price difference for each option shown next
to the label within the drop down itself. Most solutions include the ability to create and
display rating worksheets (a detailed listing of how the premium was calculated). Some
have the ability to show simplified versions to the brokers and detailed versions to the
underwriters.
ACORD upload: ACORD applications are the most commonly utilized form of application
in the industry. The data is commonly contained in the agents’ or brokers’ agency
management systems. Rather than requiring the broker to reenter the data on the
application, many systems allow brokers to upload an ACORD application and have the
data prepopulate the appropriate fields, retaining a copy of the ACORD application
elsewhere in the system.
Data upload: specialty and commercial lines policies often include large schedules of
drivers, locations, vehicles, or equipment. Many systems allow these schedules to be
imported or uploaded from an Excel spreadsheet. Some systems require that the
spreadsheet be formatted in a particular order. Some allow mapping of the spreadsheet
as the spreadsheet is being uploaded.
Data services: Underwriters rely heavily on third-party data or reports from external data
services. Most systems have some level of pre-integration with the most common data
service vendors. Some require the underwriter to manually request the external data.
Others use business rules to automatically send the data request and retrieve the data or
report. Some can take the data retrieved and populate the specific field; others store the
data as a record that the underwriter can review, and the underwriter can then enter the
data into the correct field in the policy record.
Automated underwriting: Many solutions have the ability to use business rules to
automate the underwriting process. The solutions use business rules to determine if the
transaction can proceed without human intervention, or if intervention is required, a task
is generated for the underwriter to review and act on. Some solutions can handle basic
Underwriter assignment: While some carriers still assign work manually, more and
more carriers are looking for automated support in the underwriting process. Solutions
handle underwriter assignment in a variety of ways, for example the ability to assign
policies/quotes to a team or individual using a round-robin capability, or the ability to
assign tasks to specific individuals based on specific criteria. Some solutions can assign
a transaction very granularly, based on line of business, agent, geography, and workload.
Most systems allow multiple underwriters to be assigned to work on a single account
handling different policies. Carriers also look for capabilities for manual assignment or
reassignment for both bulk transactions and single policies or accounts.
Automated renewals: Most solutions have the ability to handle no-touch automated
renewals. If the policy meets the carrier’s defined requirements, the information from the
original policy carries over to the renewal, and the policy is issued. Some allow business
rules to be used to apply an inflation factor automatically or to make other bulk changes
on policies as they renew. Those policies that do not meet the requirements are popped
out of the renewal cycle and assigned to an underwriter for intervention. Along with
automated renewals, look for automated non-renewals. Some solutions allow a policy to
be marked for non-renewal. Others allow business rules to be used to determine whether
an underwriter will allow the policy to renew. In the case of an automated non-renewal,
the system can generally send out the appropriate documents in the right time frame
according to the jurisdictional requirements of the policy.
4
Endorsements: All systems can handle endorsements. Almost all systems can handle
out-of-sequence endorsements as well. When it comes to out-of-sequence
endorsements, there are a variety of techniques in place. Some alert the underwriter to
the fact that the policy change is out of sequence. Each affected endorsement is
identified, and the underwriter can select which to back off and which to roll back on.
Others handle the back off and roll on automatically, only highlighting conflicts for an
underwriter’s intervention. At least one solution can handle multiple policy changes with
different dates on a single endorsement. Mid-term broker of record changes can often be
handled as a bulk transaction, but some systems require the changes to be implemented
policy by policy. Some allow a lot of flexibility as to when commission changes occur, and
some allow the commission to begin accruing to the new broker immediately. Others
begin commission accrual at the time of renewal.
Rating: Most, but not all, solutions include rating engines as a key feature. As vendors
create more sophisticated configuration tools, rate changes can be done by business
analysts rather than developers. The rate tables, rules, and algorithms are externalized
from the programming code. There are wide variations in the level of sophistication of the
rating engines. As carriers have moved to more complex rating algorithms, rating engines
have expanded their ability to support complex rating algorithms, including multivariate
rating and by-peril rating. The more precise an algorithm, the more precisely a risk can be
priced. As insurers extend their use of predictive models, they need algorithms that can
accommodate these models. Look for the ability to easily create subroutines; built-in
functions to handle minimum premiums, rate capping, or prorating; and the ease of
ordering the expression. Interpolation of rates is sometimes needed, like when a specific
rate is not provided in a rate table. Some tools include interpolation capabilities out of the
box. Rounding is another area to look at closely to ensure the ability to round with the
right level of granularity at any place in the expression. Most allow multiline, multilocation
rating on a single quote or policy. Many also allow multistate rating. Look for the ability to
use external party information sources (e.g., credit score, loss data, property data,
predictive scores etc.) in the rate algorithms during real-time calculation. Other features
to look for include the date management capabilities—the ability to manage multiple
dates based on the versions of the rate, table, or algorithm changes. Some solutions
require the versioning dates be embedded in the code or script. Others provide fields to
enter the dates. Some allow different versions or effective dates for renewals versus new
business.
5
Rating maintenance tools: For the easiest management and maintenance, rate tables
should be kept separate from the algorithms, and business rule definition and
management (e.g., automatic driver assignment) should be maintained separately from
the rating algorithms. It’s also helpful to keep deviations in a separate layer. Most
solutions allow the import or export of rating tables to or from spreadsheets. Look for how
the tool handles multidimensional tables. Look for the tools necessary to create the
algorithm—some have graphical Visio-like tools. Lastly, reusable rating components are
helpful, especially if there is a prebuilt library of product and rating rule components. Even
better is to have a repository of rules that is searchable and version controlled.
Testing, modeling, and analytical tools: Some solutions include very robust tools for
handling the rate analysis function. Testing, modeling, and product analysis tools that
allow an insurer to do an impact analysis to calculate the overall impact of a rate change
or a displacement analysis to identify the number of policyholders that will be affected are
included. Some include tools that make it easy to compare current rates against
proposed rates. Not all vendors have these types of tools built in. Some vendors have
business intelligence tools included and can set up reports that can provide some level of
analysis as well. Some solutions do not include any functionality for handling rate
analysis or testing. This is an area that is rising in priority for insurers. For more
information, see the report New Tools for Product Management: Four Tips for Getting It
Right.
Bureau support: Most developed markets globally have local definitions of products,
rates, and standards that inform the majority of the products in the market. In some
cases, this is imposed or managed by a particular distribution channel, in some it is
agreed to by a standards body, and in others is simply local convention. Increasingly it is
the distribution channels that are increasing product diversity and speed of change as
distribution partners impose standards of other parties. Examples include having to adopt
price comparison site data standards to appear on their lists or adopting a data standard
on a blockchain to participate in specific international marine opportunities, as seen in
InsurWave 1.
Vendor interpretation: Some vendors have their own teams of people that
support ISO content. Employees read the ISO circulars, interpret them, and send
the information to the insurer to determine if they wish to adopt the change. If the
insurer wishes to adopt the change, the vendor then loads the changes into the
policy administration system. The cost for this service is typically loaded on top of
the vendor’s annual maintenance fee for its solution. Some vendors provide
service-level guarantees to ensure the vendor does not miss a filing date.
ISO ERC support: The most significant option for rating engines is the ISO
Electronic Rating Content (ERC). With ERC, ISO offers its rating content in an
electronic format. This service has many features—all of which are intended to
streamline the process for insurers, allowing them to take revisions faster. ISO
provides all circulars in an electronic format. They provide loss costs, rules, and
forms attachment logic in both XML and Excel formats. ISO includes a reporting
utility that helps insurers identify and understand the differences between the
circular revisions and the insurer’s current rating structure, including their
program deviations. Insurers can subscribe to ISO ERC, but to get full value,
https://insurwave.com/
1
6
their policy administration or rating system needs to be able to absorb the XML
stream or Excel files.
Vendors that are ERC-enabled have invested in technical capabilities that allow
the rating solution to receive the ISO ERC changes from ISO. The vendor
creates a utility that receives the changes and transforms the data into the
solution’s data model. Typically, the solution provides additional tools to allow the
insurer to identify what changes were made and modeling tools to understand
the impact of those changes. Look for how many major and minor lines have
been enabled and how many are actually in production. For more information
about the benefits of ISO ERC, see our report Does ISO ERC Deliver the
Goods?
Fraud at quote: Fraud analytics at the point of sale is another new area we are starting
to see, particularly in markets with significant fraud issues. Many policy administration
systems can integrate with a third-party solution in this area. Some are beginning to work
on creating this capability themselves.
Reinsurance: One of the newer areas that vendors have begun to invest in is
reinsurance capabilities within the policy administration system. Most solutions do not
include this functionality. The most robust solutions allow for full program definition.
COMMON FUNCTIONALITY
There are a variety of functions that are not specific to underwriting or product
management, but can generally be found in a policy administration system.
Workflow: Some solutions serve more as data capture tools. Workflow is simulated with
screen flow. Other solutions have true workflow capabilities—the ability to automatically
generate and assign tasks based on event changes in a policy, time lapse, or data
changes in a field. Some of the solutions profiled have the capability to visualize the
workflow through graphical depictions. Some have a graphic design environment, with
automated background code generation. This means graphical depictions are
actionable—clicking on a step allows the carrier to modify that step, or steps can be
dragged and dropped to rearrange the sequencing. It is not uncommon for a software
vendor to use a third-party or open source tool to manage the workflow requirements.
Document creation: Most of the solutions include some sort of correspondence or forms
library for the most common forms and letters. Many integrate to third-party solutions to
provide additional capabilities because many of the built-in solutions are not robust
7
enough to handle production-level policy generation. Look for standard templates out of
the box. Many of the solutions will come preloaded with ISO, NCCI, or Bureau forms. The
forms attachment logic is typically included as part of the product definition, and the
templates themselves are included in the document creation tools. In addition to policy
forms, many systems can automatically generate correspondence using business rules
and task generation capabilities. When an event occurs, or the data within a field
changes, the solution can automatically create correspondence that can often be
delivered using a variety of mechanisms: mail, email, or SMS.
Reporting: Reporting capabilities vary widely across solutions. Virtually all solutions
integrate to a third-party reporting tool. Some include a third-party reporting tool out of the
box. Some solutions use open source reporting tools, and some have solutions built in-
house. Most include some level of prebuilt standard reports that can be subscribed to or
scheduled. Standard reports typically deliver operational reports, performance measures,
and some level of financial reporting. Look for the number of reports included out of the
box. Ad hoc capabilities vary widely. Some are quite easy to use, with the ability to drag
and drop data elements and build a report very simply. Many include dashboards with
graphical views of data, and many of those include drilldown capabilities.
Configuration tools: A general trend in insurance software is to create tools that allow
carriers to do more modifications of the system through configuration tools rather than
through code. The most robust tools allow carriers to easily add data elements, create
business rules, modify workflows, create forms, create screens, modify the user interface,
and even map interfaces, all using configuration tools. Some tools are extremely intuitive
with drag-and-drop and point-and-click capabilities. Others require knowledge of a
scripting language to make the changes. Many vendors are moving toward a dual
development environment with simplified tools and wizards meant for business analysts
to use to make general changes and a more robust environment meant for technical staff
to utilize.
Business rules: Look for the ability to design and execute business rules and
underwriting rules that are separate from the core program code. Carriers should assess
the ability to reuse and share rules. Some tools are extremely intuitive and use natural
language; others require knowledge of scripting. Some have visualization tools that allow
a carrier to use a Visio-like tool to build business rules. Some solutions include a
searchable and version-controlled rules repository. A few solutions offer tools to help
carriers conduct impact analysis of the rules or traceability tools to help them understand
how and when rules are being used. Since many carriers create hundreds or thousands
8
of rules, there should be a strong rules management environment with a well-organized
repository, version control and version storage, etc.
Data: Data is more and more important for carriers, and software vendors are
acknowledging this by building in more tools to help carriers with their data needs. Some
solutions deliver a certain number of extra fields that users can modify for their own use.
More common are configuration tools that allow the easy creation of data elements,
including the ability to mask data, encrypt data, add context-specific help text, and also
allow for modification of the data model. Self-documenting data dictionaries are available.
Some solutions come with an ODS out of the box and may even include a data
warehouse with the appropriate ETL tools. Most solutions are built on an industry
standard model such as ACORD.
The easiest solutions to use are those that have fields to enter the type of date and the
actual date by product or state. Some tools require the developer to enter the date in
XML. These are harder to audit.
Tools are available in some solutions that allow for auditability of versioning, and version
comparison reports come out of the box for some solutions. And, of course, look for
controls to manage concurrent changes on a release, e.g., locking out changes when
another is working on it.
As systems use more real-time data enrichment and models in their pricing, version and
change control will increase in complexity, as will audit requirements from regulators.
These capabilities may start to stretch into models and integrations that support changes
in the products.
9
handles multiple locations or vehicles on a policy. Performance as the system scales is
another important consideration.
Some of the additional end-to-end components defined here are also listed as core
processes of the PAS. This is not a contradiction. A vendor might bundle a component
with their PAS (for example, rating), but also consider it (and also sell it as) a separate,
stand-alone product. Alternatively, a vendor might provide a basic level of functionality in
one area, but also have an upgraded, higher-cost product or an ISV partnership with a
different vendor to provide an advanced solution (e.g., document creation).
In order to help insurers with their comparison of different solutions, each profile in this
report has a table summarizing whether the vendor in question offers one or more of the
following end-to-end components and whether the components are part of the base
offering or sold as a stand-alone system. We use the description “Yes—integrated into
the policy admin module” to mean that the functionality is part of a monolithic code base.
We use the description “Yes—separate module available from this vendor” to mean there
is a separate module available that has been integrated with the policy administration
system.
10
Table 1: Suite Components
SUITE AVAILABILITY
11
SUITE AVAILABILITY
ETL TOOLS ETL tools allow any organization to extract data from
numerous databases, applications, and systems,
transform the data into a usable format, and load the
data from all of these sources into a single
database, data mart, or data warehouse for
reporting, analysis, and data synchronization.
Source: Celent
12
REPORT METHOD
Celent’s ABCD Vendor View analysis is used to highlight vendors that have attained
success selling their systems in the North American market. In general, in order to have a
full profile and be included in the ABCD Vendor View grids, a policy administration
solution had to have:
• At least one new sale to one new customer in the region within the last 24 months.
• At least three live customers per region, at least one of which must be an insurer.
• Participation by at least three reference customers.
There are 14 solutions that meet these criteria and are included in this report with ABCD
profiles.
Even if a vendor is not included in the ABCD Vendor View, Celent provides a system
profile of many other solutions. Solutions that did not qualify to be ranked in the ABCD
Vendor View do not include a customer reference or a Celent opinion. There are 17
solutions that meet these criteria and are included in this report but are not included in
the ABCD Vendor View grids.
It is important to note that the information available in this report is also available through
Celent’s online resources. Prior to relying on the information for a particular vendor,
Celent suggests reviewing their online company and product profiles, which may be more
current.
LIMITATIONS
Celent believes that this study provides valuable insights into current offerings in policy
administration solutions. However, readers are encouraged to consider these results in
the following context. The vendors self-reported. Participants in the study were asked to
indicate which policy administration capabilities are provided in addition to providing
generic information about their client base. While this information was supplemented with
Chapter: Report Method
publicly available information where possible, Celent did not confirm the details provided
by the participants.
EVALUATION PROCESS
To analyze the capabilities of policy administration solutions that are active in the
insurance marketplace, Celent sent an invitation to participate in this year’s report to a
broad set of PAS vendors. There was no cost for vendors to participate.
13
Each participating vendor completed an online RFI in Celent’s VendorMatch/RFX
platform. The RFI requested information about the features provided in the solution, the
technology and architecture, the current client base, the pricing models, and the vendor
itself. RFIs were completed on 31 products for North America.
After Celent received completed RFIs from the vendors, each vendor was evaluated for
meeting the criteria for inclusion in the ABCD Vendor View analysis. Those vendors that
qualified for Celent’s ABCD evaluation provided a briefing and demo for Celent focusing
on usability and functionality for everyday users; product and rules configurability for IT
and system administration users; and the overall architecture of the system.
Celent also asked references provided by each vendor in the ABCD Vendor View
analysis to complete an online survey in order to obtain their view of the system’s
business and technology value.
The RFIs, the demos/briefings, and the reference surveys provided quantitative and
qualitative data that was used in the ABCD analysis of these vendors. This process is
described in the next section.
Vendors had an opportunity to review their profiles for factual accuracy and to provide
their own perspectives but were not permitted to influence the evaluation.
Some of the vendors profiled in this report are Celent clients, and some are not. No
preference was given to Celent clients for either inclusion in the report or in the
subsequent evaluations.
It should be noted that although a particular system is shown as implemented in only one
major line, it still may be capable of supporting both commercial and personal business.
For example, an insurer looking for a personal lines solution may wish to contact a
particular commercial lines vendor because of that vendor’s technology or delivery
capabilities.
14
CELENT’S ABCD VENDOR VIEW
While this is a standard tool that Celent uses across vendor reports in many different
areas, each report will define each category slightly differently. For this report, some of
the factors used to evaluate each vendor are listed in Table 3. Celent’s view of the
relative importance of each factor and of the solution and vendor’s capabilities also
contributes to the final rating.
Table 2: Examples of Possible Factors Used in Celent Policy Administration System ABCD
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY (AND Platform and codernity (Code base, platform, databases, localization
FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGY) capabilities, etc.)
User experience
CUSTOMER BASE Number of live insurers using the system for personal, commercial, or
specialty lines of business
DEPTH OF CUSTOMER SERVICE Size of professional services and support team in region Chapter: Celent’s ABCD Vendor View
Insurers’ post-implementation experiences
Source: Celent
15
XCELENT TECHNOLOGY AND XCELENT FUNCTIONALITY
Figure 2 positions each vendor along two dimensions: the vertical axis displaying the
relative rankings for Advanced Technology and the horizontal axis showing relative
Breadth of Functionality rankings. The XCelent Advanced Technology winner is
Guidewire PolicyCenter.
Guidewire
Guidewire InsuranceNow
PolicyCenter
Breadth of Functionality
Advanced Technology
Source: Celent
16
XCELENT CUSTOMER BASE AND XCELENT SERVICE
Figure 3 positions each vendor along two dimensions: the vertical axis displaying the
relative level of depth of customer service and the horizontal axis displaying the relative
customer base. The XCelent Customer Base award is given to Guidewire PolicyCenter.
Guidewire
PolicyCenter
Depth of Client Service
Guidewire
InsuranceNow
Client Base
Source: Celent
Celent advises insurers to consider past vendor results but not to compare the placement
of vendors in the charts from prior years, because not only is the market changing, but so
has our analysis. The criteria used to determine the A, B, C, and D rankings in this report
are broadly similar, but not identical, to the criteria used in the previous Celent PAS
vendor report published in 2018. For example, in this report, we are considering new
criteria in Advanced Technology related to microservices and integration approaches.
Chapter: Celent’s ABCD Vendor View
The market is also evolving due to acquisitions and partnerships, solutions development,
and alternative delivery models.
We suggest that insurers consider their specific needs and each vendor for what it offers.
Although they are very successful in one or more of the criteria, the XCelent Award
winners may or may not be the best match for an insurer’s specific business goals and
solution requirements.
17
VENDOR PROFILES
The profiles also include a list of in production and supported lines of business and a
table showing specific functionality capabilities. Additionally, the profiles include a table of
technology options.
If included in the ABCD Vendor View analysis, the vendor’s reference feedback gathered
through the use of an online survey is presented in the profile. Customer feedback
sections include a diagram that displays the average ratings given to the vendor in five
categories. Each average rating includes up to eight underlying ratings shown in Table 4
scored by the customer on a scale of one to five, where one means poor and five is
excellent. Open-ended comments regarding the system and the vendor are also included
in the feedback section.
DIAGRAM AVERAGE
(QUESTION ASKED) RATINGS INCLUDED IN AVERAGE*
FUNCTIONALITY
(How would you rate the features and New business quoting/issuance
functions you are currently using?)
Underwriting support
Underwriter desktop
Underwriter assignment
Document creation
Document management
Workflow/task generation
18
USER EXPERIENCE End users—e.g., underwriters or underwriting assistants
(How would you rate the technology of Flexibility of the data model
this solution on a scale of 1 to 5, where
1 means very poor and 5 means Scalability of the solution
excellent?)
Vendor's timing in improving technical performance through new
releases and fixes
(If you are familiar with the original Project management (estimations, scope creep, etc.)
implementation of this system at your
company, how would you rate this Implementation completed on time
vendor in the following areas?)
Implementation completed on budget
(After implementation, how would you Project management (estimations, scope creep, etc.)
rate the vendor's professional services
staff in the following areas?) Work completed on time
Staff turnover
Roadmap delivery
Source: Celent
*Scale 1 to 5, where 1 is poor and 5 is excellent. Not applicable or no opinion not included in average.
Concerning implementation costs and fees, Celent asked vendors to provide first-year
license and first-year other implementation costs (work by the insurer, vendor, or third
parties) for two hypothetical insurance companies:
19
• Insurance Holding Company B, with four operating companies, writing multiple lines
of business in five or more states, with a total combined direct written premium
(DWP) of US$2.1 billion.
When discussing insurance customers of the various solutions, the profiles may use the
terms very small, small, medium, large, and very large insurers.
• Very small insurers (tier 5) have under US$100 million in annual premium
20
GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE: GUIDEWIRE INSURANCENOW
COMPANY
Guidewire Software is a public company headquartered in San Mateo, California with
sales and professional services personnel located throughout North America. The
company has 2,355 employees, of whom 781 are in professional services and 198 in
technical support and licensing operations.
Guidewire will also continue its strategic relationship with Amazon to optimize its core
cloud services for the AWS cloud infrastructure.
Guidewire’s spend on R&D over the past two years has been approximately 40% of
license and maintenance revenues. Guidewire does not report on revenue or expense by
product.
21
Table 102: Company Snapshot
Source: Guidewire
USER CONFERENCES/PRODUCT WORKING The vendor offers an annual user conference or customer
GROUPS event.
Source: Guidewire
22
CELENT OPINION
InsuranceNow is an all-in-one solution with functionality for policy administration, billing,
claims, reinsurance, data reporting and visualization, portals, and other services. This
profile addresses the policy administration functionality within InsuranceNow.
InsuranceNow is currently available only within the US.
During 2019 Guidewire did a significant revamp of InsuranceNow’s UI. Navigation and
access to information within InsuranceNow policy administration is a strong point of the
solution. Clicking on items in a constantly-present side navigation panel enables access
to all major sets of information and processes within the life cycle of a claim. There is also
a set of context-sensitive go-to buttons on the right side of many screens.
Configuration is done in two environments: Studio for users with business analyst skills,
and any Java IDE (such as Eclipse) for developers. In Studio products, rules and tasks
can be created and managed in a well-designed tree and menu structure set of screens.
Once created, rates are displayed in Excel files. Tasks are typically associated with
product versions. InsuranceNow does not have a graphic workflow design environment.
More complex rating algorithms or product structures are typically created by developers
in their IDE.
OVERALL FUNCTIONALITY
Guidewire Software offers the following modules in the core system application.
Guidewire InsuranceNow is available on a standalone basis.
Source: Guidewire
23
OVERVIEW
Guidewire InsuranceNow is purpose-built for U.S. P&C insurers constrained by limited IT
resources. InsuranceNow provides insurers the freedom to focus on innovation and
service with a ready-to-go core system that is complete, not complex. Its all-in-one design
leads to rapid implementation and regular upgrades, keeping the client’s technology
current and its business agile.
The figure below shows Guidewire Software’s functionality and the production status of
key features for policy administration and servicing (PAS) systems.
Underwriter/adjuster assignment
Automated underwriter assignment
Out of office/vacation rules
Workflow
Automatic task generation/workflow
Quote
Multiline, multi-location rating on a single quote or
policy
Supports non-binding quoting (quick quote)
functionality that only includes rating/risk acceptability-
related questions
Side by side quotes
Underwriting
Automated STP underwriting
Includes underwriting analysis tools such as loss
analysis
Consolidated view of all policies of a single
policyholder
Endorsements, Renewals and Other Transactions
Supports automated cancellations
Handles out of sequence endorsements
24
Supported but Not
In Production with in Production with
Function Clients Clients Not Supported
Supports automated renewals
Excess, layers and reinsurance
Can document the layer, coverage, and limits when
other insurers are also covering parts of the total
exposure
Can indicate any reinsurance contracts which apply
Rate Calculations
Supports complex rating algorithms
Can use third-party data gathered real time as an
input to the rate calculation
If legal in clients’ territory, the system provides price
optimization features
Rating Maintenance
Rate table design and update management tools
Source: Guidewire
INTERNATIONALIZATION
25
CUSTOMER BASE
Guidewire InsuranceNow has 47 total customers.
Figure 27: Guidewire InsuranceNow client base by geography, line of business, institution type, and
deployment mode
P&C:
Comme
rcial
Lines,
44%
26
CUSTOMER FEEDBACK
Figure 28: Customer Feedback
5
Functionality, 3.86
4
Three clients provided feedback on Guidewire InsuranceNow. One client has been using
the system more than five years, one for one to three years, and one for less than one
year. Two have a mix of personal and commercial lines, and one has mostly personal
lines.
Personal Auto
Homeowners/Home
Renters/Contents
27
P&C LOBS AVAILABILITY
Umbrella
Commercial Auto
Commercial Property
Commercial Liability
Workers’ Compensation
Excess Policies
Legend: = Supported and in production; = Supported but not in production; X = Not supported
Source: Guidewire
TECHNOLOGY
Guidewire hosts all new InsuranceNow customers in Amazon Web Services (AWS). The
preferred technology stack for InsuranceNow includes the Amazon Linux AMI operating
system, Apache Tomcat 8 application server, Amazon Aurora database for operational
data, and Amazon Redshift database for reporting.
The primary UI for business users, developers, and configurators is 100% browser based
and provides a touch screen interface. The vendor does not have plans to change the
framework in the future.
Technology details for Guidewire InsuranceNow are provided in the table below.
28
Table 106: Technology options
CORE CODE MODIFICATION Core modifications are the exception to the rule.
29
DEPLOYMENT MODELS NA: public cloud:
Source: Guidewire
DATA
The InsuranceNow data model is proprietary, object-oriented, easily extensible, and
based on the ACORD standard.
The solution supports industry standard data model schemas by ACORD. The database
was designed from the ground up for this product. Clients can change the data model
through XML metadata. The data model can be released to the client, can be easily
published to a client's data model, can map to an intermediate format (such as an
industry standard) to share with a client.
INTEGRATIONS
Guidewire Software provides Web services, XML, not through web services, HTML,
HTTP, RESTful HTTP style services, JSON format, MQSeries, JMS or similar queue
30
technology, custom APIs, flat files, native messaging, and others as integration methods.
InsuranceNow can support a variety of methods for interfacing with external systems.
API details for the vendor are as follows: API is documented; external systems can
trigger an event in the system that can be responded to by a workflow or business rules
system; API management supports local or global standards such as ACORD application
creation and rendering; API sample codes are available to clients; API developer portal is
available for support and descriptions; API testing portal and the ability to use scripts on
website is available; the system allows API publishing in SOAP, REST, JSON, and XML
style services as APIs; API version management is available; access to the APIs is
managed and use of APIs tracked by developers; Guidewire Software provides
documentation and training for API integrations. The vendor does provide training for API
integrations. InsuranceNow currently comes out of the box with over 120 JSON-based
web service APIs. All business processing within InsuranceNow is designed as a Web
Service that can be exposed as an API.
The table below shows available products pre-integrated with Guidewire InsuranceNow.
INTEGRATION
Address verification tools: Service Objects DOTS Address Validation and Geocode,
Distribution management systems (e.g., commissions and licensing): InsuranceNow includes integrated
commissions and licensing, document creation systems: DocOrigin, Smart Communications,
Product configurator: InsuranceNow includes Studio, a tool to configure products and other system behavior
31
INTEGRATION
Credit/finance databases for both individuals and businesses: LexisNexis Insurance Score
Drivers/driving history databases for both individuals and businesses: LexisNexis MVR, Softech MVR
Insurance experience databases for both individuals and businesses: LexisNexis CLUE Auto and Property
Location/property databases for both individuals and businesses: Google Places, Clue Property Data Report
Medical databases for both individuals and businesses: Medicare 111 Query and Reporting through Perr &
Knight
Source: Guidewire
CONFIGURATION
InsuranceNow provides true end user configuration for rates and rating using Excel, a
business user configuration toolkit called Studio, and a technical configuration platform
for more experienced developers. True end users can set up rating algorithms and rates
using a standard Excel workbook. Business users can use Studio to perform product
configuration including the roll-out of new states and versions and business rule
configuration. Technical users can perform configuration using the InsuranceNow Eclipse
or IntelliJ IDEA JAVA integrated development environments (IDE), where they can
directly change the metadata files. Additionally, configurations that are made frequently
and are technically trivial—such as adding/removing an authority role for a user—can be
made directly in the InsuranceNow application by any authorized user. Guidewire
provides certification courses on configuration through Guidewire Education on all three
of these approaches.
The system supports reusable components that can be referenced in any product as
required for reuse. In addition, it supports cut and paste between products and
inheritance from a country-wide to a state level and between products for creation of
package products, etc.
They use open source tools to build automated functional tests (AFTs) including
Fitnesse, Selenium, and JUnit. Guidewire uses a continuous build framework utilizing
Hudson/Jenkins to facilitate and automate regression testing for their own development
with either continuous integration or continuous delivery. Impact analysis support for
developers is provided by the configuration and development user interface which helps
analyze these changes. Developers can analyze dependencies using tools in the IDE
including the ability to analyze module, backward, or cyclic dependencies. Developers
can also analyze references to any class, variable, method, or parameter.
For auditability, the system maintains a complete audit trail of all transactions and data
changes with before and after values, date, user, and time stamp.
The following changes require a restart of the server to take effect: change to a
document, change to user interface, change to underlying data model, new product
creation, product modification/configuration, new web service or integration point, screen
configuration/change, workflow change.
32
Table 108: Approach to System Changes
Table maintenance, list of values, etc. Configurable using simple tools targeted for a
business user
Product definition (insurance or banking products) Configurable using simple tools targeted for a
business user
Role-based security, access control, and Configurable using simple tools targeted for a
authorizations business user
Source: Guidewire
SECURITY
InsuranceNow conforms to SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II and PCI. To maintain these,
Guidewire undergoes a number of third-party audits throughout the year. Guidewire
Software is PCI compliant. One-time passwords, flexible user permissioning, out of band
identification, security tokens/pins, multi-factor authentication, and federated identity
support are available as authentication factors for internal and external users.
33
PARTNERSHIPS
Table 109: Partnerships
Source: Guidewire
34
IMPLEMENTATION, AND SUPPORT
Table 110: Implementation and Support
FUNCTION APPROACH
EMPLOYEES AVAILABLE /AVERAGE Guidewire Software has 979 staff with 15 average years of
EXPERIENCE LEVEL (YEARS) experience providing professional services/client support for
this solution.
The average number of customers per professional
services/client support staff is 19.
LOCATIONS OF EMPLOYEES Guidewire Software has employees across the world, with
1,472 employees in the United States and 883 employees
internationally.
If implementation resources need to be sourced from
different countries, the vendor applies specific rates by
location.
USE OF THIRD PARTIES They regularly work with third-party system integrators.
Conversion options: vendor or third-party.
Source: Guidewire
35
PRICING
Table 111: Pricing Models
Source: Guidewire
Source: Guidewire
36
GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE: GUIDEWIRE POLICYCENTER
- Advanced Technology
- Customer Base
COMPANY
Guidewire Software is a public company headquartered in San Mateo, California with
sales and professional services personnel located throughout NA, EMEA, APAC, and
LATAM. The company has 2,355 employees, of whom 781 are in professional services
and 198 in technical support and licensing operations.
With each major release of Guidewire’s InsuranceSuite and its associated products
PolicyCenter, BillingCenter, and ClaimCenter, Guidewire has upgraded the application,
underlying tools, third-party libraries, Java versions, and required application stack
options, often expanding the list of vendors supported.
Guidewire’s spend on R&D over the past two years has been approximately 40% of
license and maintenance revenues. Guidewire does not report on revenue or expense by
product.
NYSE: GWRE
Source: Guidewire
37
CURRENT RELEASE AND DATE OF 10.0.3/2020
RELEASE
TARGET MARKET Mid to large sized property and casualty insurers and
personal and commercial lines of business including
workers’ comp.
NEW CLIENTS SINCE 2017 North America: Canada: 10, United States: 35
LATAM: Argentina: 1
USER CONFERENCES/PRODUCT WORKING The vendor offers an annual user conference or customer
GROUPS event.
CELENT OPINION
Guidewire’s PolicyCenter has had a significant revamp of its UI. The most significant
addition is a left side, context sensitive navigation pane that provides relevant actions,
indicators for sequences to be completed, and links to pages for other information or
functions. Other features supporting ease of use include: a quick quote wizard having
pre-defined (and modifiable) coverage levels, an indicator of missing or erroneous data
that pops-in from the right margin, an easy to use table format for resolving out of
sequence endorsement issues, and options for making renewals automated or manually
processed.
38
projection changes as coverages, limits, deductions and other product characteristics
change. Additional license fees are required for all of these add-ins.
OVERALL FUNCTIONALITY
Guidewire Software offers the following modules in the core system application.
Guidewire PolicyCenter is available on a standalone basis.
SUITE AVAILABILITY
Source: Guidewire
OVERVIEW
Guidewire PolicyCenter™ enables property and casualty insurers to meet the needs of a
rapidly changing industry with more effective underwriting, agile policy and product
management, and excellent customer service.
PolicyCenter embodies 10 years of innovation through partnerships with more than 100
property and casualty insurers. Insurers leverage this experience and Guidewire’s
39
commitment to gain market-driven innovation in customer service, underwriting decision-
making, and policy management.
The figure below shows Guidewire Software’s functionality and the production status of
key features for policy administration and servicing (PAS) systems.
40
Supported but Not
In Production with in Production with
Function Clients Clients Not Supported
Product Design Tools
Base insurance product (templates)
Inheritance of product and rating rules
Rate Calculations
Supports complex rating algorithms
Can use third-party data gathered real time as an
input to the rate calculation
If legal in your territory, the system provides price
optimization features
Rating Maintenance
Rate table design and update management tools
Source: Guidewire
INTERNATIONALIZATION
Guidewire Software can support multiple currencies, with USD, GBP, EUR, AUD, CAD,
JPY, and RUB currently in production. Guidewire Software can support multiple
language, with English, French, German, Dutch, Japanese, Spanish, Chinese,
Portuguese, Italian, and Russian currently in production.
CUSTOMER BASE
Figure 30: Guidewire Software client base by geography, line of business, institution type, and
deployment mode in North America
Agents/Brokers
40%
Tier 5 21%
30% Tier 4 33%
19%
20% Tier 3 13%
41
Line of Business Distribution Deployment Type Distribution
P&C: Specialty,
9% Public cloud,
P&C: Workers
30%
Compensation,
8%
P&C: Private
Commercial cloud,
Lines, 34% 3% On-premise at the
customer, 68%
P&C: Personal
Lines, 48%
Source: Guidewire
CUSTOMER FEEDBACK
Figure 31: Customer Feedback
5 Functionality, 4.27
Three clients provided feedback on Guidewire PolicyCenter. One client has been using
the system for three to five years, one for less than one year, and one is still
implementing it. Two clients have all or mostly personal lines and one has a mix of
personal and commercial lines.
42
Clients felt the solution integrated most easily with their claims. Regarding their
implementation experience, the implementers‘ knowledge of the solution and relevant
technology received the highest marks. Finally, in the area of ongoing system support,
knowledge of the insurer’s business received the highest score.
Personal Auto
Homeowners/Home
Renters/Contents
Umbrella
Commercial Auto
Commercial Property
Commercial Liability
Workers’ Compensation
Legend: = Supported and in production; = Supported but not in production; X = Not supported
Source: Guidewire
TECHNOLOGY
Guidewire applications are built exclusively for the J2EE platform from a clean-sheet
design: they contain no legacy code. Each application runs as a standard three-tiered
architecture with a web client on the front end, an application server hosting the
application, and a database storing the content. Each layer of the application is built
using modern, proven technology. The applications run as clustered instances deployed
on the J2EE Server and connect to the Database via standard JDBC. All application
functionality is provided through a web browser interface, making it simple to provision
and update the application for internal and external users.
43
Guidewire’s technology core is based on the requirements of Guidewire’s customers.
Although each carrier is unique, they have a standard set of base requirements that need
to be addressed by the technology. Layered on top of the technology core is the base
functional content, in this instance, the PolicyCenter application. The final layer is the
customer-configured content, which is created using the tools from the technology core.
The underlying technology stack has always been a standard Java Enterprise Edition
(Java EE) server application server. Each Guidewire application is built and deployed as
a Web Application Archive (WAR) or Enterprise Application Archive (EAR) file to the
application server. It contains all the configuration, operational data, and data definition
files necessary to execute the application. The operational data for the Guidewire
application is stored inside a relational database. Only the versions of the underlying
databases and application servers have changed to stay current.
The primary UI for business users is 100% browser based. For developers and
configurators it is 100% browser based, thick client installed on a desktop. The vendor
does not have plans to change the framework in the future.
Technology details for Guidewire PolicyCenter are provided in the table below.
CORE CODE MODIFICATION Core modifications are the exception to the rule.
44
SCALABILITY Scalability metrics: Guidewire has performed extensive
load and stress testing on Guidewire PolicyCenter™ 9
modeling the demands of high-volume insurers. Current
results include successful testing at over 20,000,000 in-
force policies and 20,000 concurrent users.
Source: Guidewire
DATA
Guidewire Software's data model is designed by Guidewire. These models have been
designed to support the full policy and billing lifecycles with excellent run-time
45
transactional performance and can be easily extended on a per-carrier basis using the
included configuration tooling. During an implementation project, carriers are free to map
the data to industry models (such as ACORD) for data exchange in integration.
PolicyCenter includes out of the box functionality to process an ACORD FNOL XML file
to populate into an initial policy.
The database was designed from the ground up for this product. Clients can change the
data model using the included Guidewire Studio configuration tool. Customers never
modify the application source code for any reason. The data model can be released to
the client, can be easily published to a client's data model, and can map to an
intermediate format (such as an industry standard) to share with a client.
INTEGRATIONS
Guidewire Software provides Web services, XML, not through web services, HTML,
HTTP, RESTful HTTP style services, JSON format, MQSeries, JMS or similar queue
technology, custom APIs, flat files, native messaging, other as integration methods.
PolicyCenter's integration platform can integrate with any third-party system. They
recommend a more loosely coupled approach using Web services or specific sets of
Guidewire-provided integration APIs.
The table below shows available products pre-integrated with Guidewire PolicyCenter.
46
Table 118: Insurance Pre-Integrations
INTEGRATION
Agency/broker management connectivity solutions (those that manage the data transfer between a carrier's
systems and an agent/broker's systems): Vertafore TransactNOW
Loss control or premium audit systems: Utilant LC360; Guidewire Checking Audits
Policy administration systems: Guidewire PolicyCenter, Price optimization tools: Guidewire Predictive
Analytics
Credit/finance databases for both individuals and businesses: LexisNexis Consumer Credit Score
Demographic/consumer databases for both individuals and businesses: LexisNexis Consumer Credit Score
Drivers/driving history databases for both individuals and businesses: LexisNexis MVR
Insurance experience databases for both individuals and businesses: LexisNexis C.L.U.E.
Location/property databases for both individuals and businesses: CoreLogic® RCT Express
Source: Guidewire
47
CONFIGURATION
Guidewire Software provides specific tools for versioning parts of the configuration/code.
Guidewire provides testing tools that help evaluate the impact of change. Configuration
changes to the application will follow a build, test, deploy process. Customers typically
have multiple test environments in which impact testing can be performed before moving
changes to production. Guidewire Studio, built on JetBrains’ IntelliJ IDEA software, offers
a wide variety of refactoring options to track down and update any configured code
reference automatically. Refactoring options such as changing of class signatures,
encapsulating fields or methods, and move, migrate, replace options can be easily
accessible using the Refactor context menu within Studio. Additionally, Guidewire
provides a merge tool during the upgrade process to highlight files that have been
modified by the customer or modified with new content by Guidewire. A customer then
has the option of taking on the latest changes from Guidewire or maintaining their current
configuration.
Table maintenance, list of values, etc. Configurable using tools targeted for an IT user
Product definition (insurance or banking products) Configurable using simple tools targeted for a
business user
Role-based security, access control, and Configurable using simple tools targeted for a
authorizations business user
Source: Guidewire
SECURITY
Guidewire InsuranceSuite Cloud (including PolicyCenter) and Cyence products are ISO
27001 certified. Guidewire has demonstrated that it meets the Payment Card Industry
(PCI) standard and has completed AICPA SOC1 and SOC2 audits. One-time passwords,
flexible user permissioning, out of band identification, security tokens/pins, multi-factor
authentication, and federated identity support are available as authentication factors for
internal and external users.
Each customer has isolations for all their environments enforced at the network, compute
and storage level by combination of firewalls, software defined networks and container
technologies. Guidewire Cloud Platform enables end-to-end encryption with TLS 1.2 and
all systems are fully hardened. Additional security precautions are taken for DDoS and
malware protection. SOC 2 compliant logging and runtime scanning of containers is
enabled to find and mitigate vulnerabilities. Guidewire Cloud Platform systems have
48
encryption at rest, endpoint security, threat intelligence and cyberattack response
services for its operators.
PARTNERSHIPS
Table 120: Partnerships
Source: Guidewire
FUNCTION APPROACH
EMPLOYEES AVAILABLE /AVERAGE Guidewire Software has 979 staff with 15 average years of
EXPERIENCE LEVEL (YEARS) experience providing professional services/client support for
this solution.
The average number of customers per professional
services/client support staff is 7.
49
FUNCTION APPROACH
LOCATIONS OF EMPLOYEES Guidewire Software has employees across the world with
1,472 employees in the United States and 883 employees
internationally
If implementation resources need to be sourced from
different countries, the vendor applies specific rates by
location.
SLA AVAILABILITY Service scope included in base SLA: 24x7 service hours
Services available for additional fee: extended service
hours (beyond 9 am to 5 pm)
Features typically included in SLA: incident status updates
based on priority level of incident, metrics and reports,
ticket prioritization, upgrades
System availability: 96 to 100%
Source: Guidewire
PRICING
Table 122: Pricing Models
Source: Guidewire
Source: Guidewire
50
CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
FOR INSURERS
There is no single best policy administration solution for all insurers. There are a number
of good choices for an insurer with almost any set of requirements. An insurer seeking a
new policy administration system should begin the process by looking inward. Every
insurer has its own unique mix of lines of business, geography, staff capabilities,
business objectives, and financial resources. This unique combination, along with the
organization’s risk appetite, will influence the list of vendors for consideration.
Some vendors are a better fit for an insurance company with a large IT group that is
deeply proficient with the most modern platforms and tools. Other vendors are a better fit
for an insurance company that has a small IT group and wants a vendor to take a leading
role in maintaining and supporting its applications.
Most policy administration systems bring some level of out-of-the-box functionality for
various lines of business and operating models. Many systems offer powerful
configuration tools to build capabilities for both known and future requirements. We’re
increasingly seeing a growing focus on integration strategies, including a shift to a
microservices architecture.
We recommend that insurers that are looking for a policy administration system narrow
their choices by focusing on four areas:
• The functionality needed and available out of the box for the lines of business and
states desired. Check to see what is actually in production.
• The technology, including the overall architecture, the integration framework, and the
configuration tools and environment.
• The vendor’s stability, knowledge of, and investment in the solution.
• Implementation and support capabilities and experience.
FOR VENDORS
As a group, vendors continue to make significant investments in their policy
administration systems. The solutions are delivering more functionality, improving
configuration tools, and are more connected, with a new focus on integration. Although
these trends are all very good news for insurers, they do make the competitive
challenges facing vendors that much more daunting.
• Focusing on improving usability for both new and experienced users and managers.
• Making implementation faster and less expensive.
Chapter: Concluding Thoughts
• Continue to move to open APIs and other integration frameworks to drive the easy
orchestration of processes and data across external digital capabilities.
• Continuing to build out configuration environments to put change controls in the
hands of the carriers.
Was this report useful to you? Please send any comments, questions, or suggestions for
upcoming research topics to [email protected].
51
LEVERAGING CELENT’S EXPERTISE
If you found this report valuable, you might consider engaging with Celent for custom
analysis and research. Our collective experience and the knowledge we gained while
working on this report can help you streamline the creation, refinement, or execution of
your strategies.
Vendor short listing and selection. We perform discovery specific to you and your
business to better understand your unique needs. We then create and administer a
custom RFI to selected vendors to assist you in making rapid and accurate vendor
choices.
IT and business strategy creation. We collect perspectives from your executive team,
your front line business and IT staff, and your customers. We then analyze your current
position, institutional capabilities, and technology against your goals. If necessary, we
help you reformulate your technology and business plans to address short-term and long-
term needs.
Product and service strategy evaluation. We help you assess your market position in
terms of functionality, technology, and services. Our strategy workshops will help you
target the right customers and map your offerings to their needs.
Market messaging and collateral review. Based on our extensive experience with your
potential clients, we assess your marketing and sales materials—including your website
and any collateral.
52
RELATED CELENT RESEARCH
API and Affinity in Insurance: Revisiting our SOA Predictions and Path Forward
August 2019
The New Architecture for Core Systems: What It Is and How Quickly Vendors Are
Adopting It
March 2018
53
Copyright Notice
Prepared by
99 High Street, 32nd Floor 1 Rue Euler The Imperial Hotel Tower, 13th Floor
Boston, MA 02110-2320 Paris 1-1-1 Uchisaiwai-cho
75008 Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011
Tel.: +1.617.262.3120
Fax: +1.617.262.3121 Tel.: +33.1.45.02.30.00 Tel: +81.3.3500.3023
Fax: +33.1.45.02.30.01 Fax: +81.3.3500.3059
1166 Avenue of the Americas 55 Baker Street Unit 04, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10036 London W1U 8EW Central Plaza
19 Harbour Road, Wanchai
Tel.: +1.212.541.8100 Tel.: +44.20.7333.8333
Fax: +1.212.541.8957 Fax: +44.20.7333.8334 Tel.: +852 2301 7500
USA Italy
Brazil Switzerland