RP1 - Copy - EDITED 2
RP1 - Copy - EDITED 2
Department of Education
Region II – Cagayan Valley
Schools Division of Quirino
DIFFUN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
LABORATORIES
Researchers
A Research Paper
Presented to the
Philippines
Research Teacher
Chapter 1
Rationale
Science laboratories are commonly adapted by students who want to expand their
understanding in science concept and theories. One of the main methods of effective teaching
and learning is to conduct an experiment to gain better understanding of something the student
interested in. By maximizing experimentation, learners will be more likely to achieve these ideas
if they are designed with clear learning outcomes in mind. Students desire to understand how and
why laboratory experiment require to perform. Lacking any one of these, the experience loses
educational value of them. By addressing this issue and enhance authentic research experience
Several studies report that positive attitude toward mathematics and science tend to
decline with age, from primary through the secondary school years. These unfavorable attitudes
could be attributed to the fact that science education in secondary and high school fails to engage
students at satisfactory level. This may result from financial, safety, and practical limitations
restricting the possibility for implementing educational experiences that truly inspire students
(Makransky, et al., 2020). Students often arrive at practical with no clear ideas of the techniques
employed, the skills required to conduct the experiment, or understanding of the underlying
scientific principles. Preparation is key as it effects confidence, attitude and success toward
Students who conducted experiments in a lab setting reported higher level of perceived
relatedness, competence, and flow experience. This suggests that visiting outreach science
laboratories beneficial for student perception of connection, effectiveness, and enjoyment during
experimentation (Kirchhoff et al., 2023). They believe that these measures enable student to
achieve optimal learning development. Teachers also expressed the belief that science
experiment can enhance student retention and appreciation of science concept (De Borja et al.,
2020). Science laboratories are crucial process, facilitating active student participation and
Research Questions
1.What are the benefits that learners can achieve in performing laboratory experiments?
2.What is the main purpose by performing an experiment inside the science laboratory?
The scope of our study is to maximize the experiment experience in a science laboratory.
It is definite to the Grade 11 SHS students of DNHS. The study limits its coverage to the Grade
11 STEM students in Diffun National High School, the main purpose of this study is to explore
ways to enhance the learning and practical engagement of STEM students inside of science
laboratories, this study aims to create a more enriching and effective educational experience for
STEM students.
Our study is can be used to improve learning skills, learning development and effective
educational experience.
Students Students can gain more knowledge about the topic and have a better awareness
Teachers By using teaching strategies, the laboratory experiment can explore different
techniques of the teachers that can be effective for student learning outcomes.
Future Researchers Foundation and starting point of the future researchers to build upon
and explore additional aspects related to optimizing the learning effectiveness, engagement and
Chapter 2
This chapter presents the relevant literature and studies that the researcher considered in
strengthening the importance of the study. The study was designed to maximize the experience
of STEM students in senior high school (SHS) experiments inside science laboratories. It’s also
represent the synthesis of the study to fully understand the research for better comprehension.
Related Literature
The National Research Council’s (NCR) report that the experiences of high school
students nationally are described along with recommendations for improving and supporting
these experiences. Since the NCR report was published, science laboratory experiences for
students have received still greater prominence in U.S. as leaders of the National Science
Research and Science Education. Linda Froschauer, current NSTA President, articulated the
organization’s strong commitment to laboratory experience stating that “Science educators are
firmly committed to the role of the laboratory in the teaching and learning of chemistry, physics,
biology, and earth science”(Campbell & Bohn 2016). Until now the Inquiry-based learning (IBL)
been considered as essential component of science education for more than 50 years. Due to its
long-lasting importance and the extensive literature on the topic, the term IBL is accompanied by
The National Research Council (NCR) defined IBL as activities in which learners
scientists study natural world propose explanations based on the evidence derived from their
work (Kranz et al., 2022). Besides, The American Chemical Society (ACS) continues to
emphasize the importance of a hands-on laboratory experience in all areas of science. The
laboratory environment allows students to gain a first-hand experience with course concepts and
further provides them with the opportunity to explore methods used by scientist in their
discipline (Mojica & Upmacis, 2021).This study, stylized view of lab task allocation is that the
supervisor is responsible for upstream tasks such as problem identification and coordination,
while students are engaged in downstream tasks such as experiments. For example, the National
Research Council (NRC, 1998) illustrates the operation of American life science labs as follows:
addressed, specifying the methods to be used, obtaining necessary funding, finding the suitable
The research personnel in the group usually work on more specific tasks that pertain to
the construction of research tools or the acquisition and analysis of data” (Shibayama, 2018).
According to (Hodson, 2014), and much of the science education research literature, doing
science (laboratory work) is seen as a means of accomplishing both learning science and learning
concepts, theories, and explanatory models, and to learn how to carry out scientific
investigations. When the students do not engage in and observe the experiments themselves, they
lose the sense that the data represents something real; the data comes across as model data”
rather than as “actual data” that they themselves had a hand in producing (Finne et al., 2023).
They believe that these measures enable students to achieve optimal learning development.
Teachers also expressed the belief that science experiments can enhance student retention
and appreciation of science concepts (De Borja et al., 2020). It has been described that laboratory
work positively influences science education and enhances science students’ cognitive skills.
Still, shortage of equipment, low quality of laboratory material and overcrowded classes are
precautions and standards as being essential to high-quality educational and working conditions.
In general, academic institutions have made progress in minimizing the risk factors in teaching
laboratories by introducing less hazardous materials and procedures and through supervised
The students experienced that the presence in the laboratory provided them with an
embodied structure. The students describe the importance of being physically present in the
specialized environment of the laboratory, with all their senses at work. The embodiment
experienced by the students is related to the physical embodiment described by Kersting and
Related Studies
that engaging in laboratory work should be part of science education. However, it is important to
distinguish between doing science and teaching science. Evidence for the quality of teaching and
learning in the laboratory is ambiguous (Finne et al., 2022). Practicum activity emphasizes that
students acquire new experience, anticipation, curiosity, motivation, confidence and the greatest
significant aspect because they have a deeper learning understanding (Putri et al., 2021).
Learning analytics, referring to the measurement, collection, analysis, and reporting of data about
learners and their contexts in order to optimize learning and the environments in which it occurs,
laboratory skills in K-12 science classroom ( Jiang et al., 2023).The students perform hands-on
experiments in small groups cooperatively under the close supervision of the local staff
comprised of “real” scientists and/or preservice teachers acting as tutors using laboratory
equipment that is used in scientific research but not normally available at schools due to its high
costs (Kirchhoff et al,. 2023). Experiential learning provides students ample times and space to
engage to in this process of learning through the senses. This hands-on approach allows student
experiential learning is superior in fostering knowledge retention and application (Lashley et al.,
2020). According to Rebecca Rivard (2020), This outbreak simulation in Stem courses provides
colleges students with a practical experience that enhances their ability to apply laboratory skills
in real world scenarios. By engaging in grant writing, presentation skills and, experimental
design, data analysis, and adapting to field experiments, students develop a comprehensive
understanding of research processes. This hands on approach helps bridge the gap between
theoretical learning and practical application, fostering improved engagement and understanding
among participants.
A range of theories currently exists on learning, learning styles, and learning provision
should aim to give each learner the opportunity to engage in the manner that suits them best.
Learners, especially those within the STEM curricula, are known to respond effectively to a high
level of practical learning application and to the development of knowledge through experience
(Morton, 2022). The impact of experiment was expressed in the cognitive, affective, and
through laboratory exploration and level of engagement and interaction (Goldina & Barattini,
2018). The aims of Science Education in the Philippines are to develop scientific literacy among
learners, with the guiding principle of the Science Curriculum, Science experiments or hands-on
An individual could put theory into practice student are able to spend time interacting
with samples (e.g., rocks, minerals, and fossils) and conduct activities. Science classes should
happen in laboratory and involves students either in carrying out practical task for themselves or
observing their performance by teacher. Also, Students who were exposed to well-designed
exposure to reactions, materials, and equipment in a lab setting (De Borja et al., 2020). Students’
experiences and perceptions about the laboratory is key to understanding the laboratory
Finne (2022) believed that the experimentation is a central part of science. Campbell &
Bohn (2016) defined that science laboratory experiences for students have received still greater
prominence as reported from the national research council's (NRC).The experience of the high
school students nationality are described along with recommendations for improving and
supporting these experiences. While Kranz (2022) states that NRC defined Inquire-based
learning as activities in which learners develop knowledge and understanding scientific ideas, as
well as an understanding of how scientist study natural world propose explanations based on the
evidence derived from their work. Shibayama (2018) also stated that NCR defining the scientific
question to be addressed, specifying the method to be used, obtaining necessary funding, finding
the suitable environment, and attracting the research personnel. These studies together verified
that the experience in science laboratories support the learners and educators to expand their
Thomas & Meldrum (2018) found that the students experience and perception about the
decisions. Goldina & Barattini (2018) added that the impact of the experiment was expressed in
Similarly, Rivard (2020) observed the practical experience of the students to enhance
their ability to apply laboratory skills in real world scenarios. In addition, De Borja (2020)
addressed that students who are exposed to well-designed laboratory experience develop
problem-solving and critical -thinking skill, as well as gain exposure to reactions, materials, and
equipment in lab setting. However, Kirchhoff (2023) also found that the laboratory equipment
that is used in scientific research is not normally available at school due to its high cost. These
theories testified that the students who exposed in science laboratories can gain more
Doosti (2015) described that laboratory work positive influences science education and
enhance science students’ cognitive skills. Siniyeh and Shehri (2020) added that the academic
institutions have made progress in minimizing the risk factors in teaching laboratories by
introducing less hazardous materials and procedures and through supervised experimentation.
Lashley (2020) analyze that the experimental learning provides students ample time and space to
engage to this process of learning through the sense. Finne (2023) found that the students
describe the importance of being physically present in the specialized environment of the
laboratory, with all their sense at work. While Jiang (2023) reported that the data about learners
and their context in order to optimize learning and the environments in which it occurs, is
providing to be a powerful approach for understanding and improving science learning. Morton
(2022) added that the learners who within STEM curricula, are known to respond effectively in
high level in practical learning application and to the development of knowledge through
experience. These concepts support that the laboratory experiment have a comprehensive
Chapter 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter describes the method and the procedure of this study which includes
research design, sampling techniques, data, collection, presentation, and data analysis.
Research Design
The research design that will utilize in this study is phenomenology design. The
of view. We choose phenomenology because this is the design that appropriate for the problem
that we are investigating, we want to the perspective of the students that their experience. Using
this particular design, we would achieve the result that we are aiming for in our study.
participants unit are selecting in grade 11 Stem students which have certain characteristics that
has been determine with different experiencing in laboratory experiment activities. Semi-
The sample for this study 10 out of 86 grade 11 Stem students are only selected
randomly. The sample will include both male and female students using diversity. Each of grade
11 enrolled in Stem curriculum active to participate semi structured interview, and able of
To gather data from the participants, the researcher created an interview guide. When the
guide is finished, the researcher will ask the teacher to examine it. Upon the approval of the
research questionnaires, the researcher multiplied them by the number of copies sufficient to
accommodate all the respondents. After that, the researcher will assist the respondents in
understanding the aim of the research study so they can accurately answer the questions by
simply explaining it to them. This will provide the context and importance of their response to
our study. Researchers have to record the respondents' answers during the interview to have
Data Analysis
In this chapter will investigate the experiment experience inside science laboratories and
the impact on grade 11 STEM students using the qualitative analysis. Interpretive
phenomenological analysis will be used to accurately interpret the findings and used to analyze
the data collected from the semi-structured interview with a sample of 10 students.
purposive sampling refers to a group of non-probability sampling techniques that allows for the
selection of grade 11 STEM students with different experience experiment inside science
experiencing experiment inside science laboratory while focusing on the research question.
3.2 Findings
Grade 11 STEM students experiencing struggles and difficulties affecting the experiment
inside science laboratories leading some problems. Common problems that trigger in this are
making mistakes, insufficient with equipment, lacking of experience, having short time, and
problem -solving, causes to unfinished the experiment. They can cope up with this by seeking
some help from the teachers and peers that have the appropriate experience.
3.3 Discussion
In findings show that the experience experiment inside science laboratories affects grade
11 STEM students’ performance. Usual effects like management of time, coping strategies,
sufficient equipment and help of the teachers to manage the experiment. It's important to support
students with effective strategies to improve their experience in having science laboratories.
3.4 Informed consent, secrecy, anonymity, minimizing potential harm, and participant
transparency will be our top priorities when it comes to ethical considerations to our participants.
Questionnaire