EIGHT CASE STUDIES

ON INTEGRATING
THE UNITED NATIONS’ NORMATIVE
AND OPERATIONAL WORK

A study commissioned by the United Nations Development Group

September 2015
 2

Table of Contents

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................5
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 10
INTERNATIONAL NORMS AND STANDARDS ........................................................................ 12
METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 17
CASE STUDIES .................................................................................................................... 19
ALBANIA: BRINGING WOMEN’S HUMAN RIGHTS HOME....................................................................... 19
MOZAMBIQUE: PROMOTING SOCIAL PROTECTION FLOORS .................................................................. 25
YEMEN: COOPERATION ON STRENGTHENING THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN YEMEN ............................ 31
MOLDOVA: UNCT STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN SUPPORTING CRPD IMPLEMENTATION .............................. 36
NEPAL: A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH TO TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN NEPAL .................................. 48
CHINA – FIJI – GUATEMALA: REDUCING HIV-RELATED STIGMA AND DISCRIMINATION AND INCREASING
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ....................................................................................................................... 54
ZAMBIA: UN JOINT PROGRAMME ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE ........................................................ 60
FINDINGS, COMMON APPROACHES AND LESSONS LEARNED .............................................. 63
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................... 70
ANNEX: INTERNATIONAL NORMS AND STANDARDS ........................................................... 72
Acronyms and abbreviations 3

CD Capacity development

CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child

CRPD Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

CS Civil society

DaO Delivering as One

DOCO Development Operations Coordination Office

DPO Disabled people’s organization

DV Domestic violence

ECOSOC Economic and Social Council

ES Environmental sustainability

EU European Union

FGM Female genital mutilation

GBV Gender-based violence

GE Gender equality

HIV Human immunodeficiency virus

ILO International Labour Organization

IOM International Organization for Migration

IPO Indigenous peoples’ organizations

LDC Least developed country

LIC Lower-income country

MIC Middle-income country

MP Member of parliament
NGO Non-governmental organization
4
OHCHR Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

PLHIV People living with HIV

QCPR Quadrennial comprehensive policy review of operational activities for

development of the United Nations System

RC Resident Coordinator

RBM Results-based management

SC Steering committee

SMART Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound

TJ Transitional justice

TOC Theory of change

UN Women United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women

UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS

UNCT United Nations Country Team

UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework

UNDG United Nations Development Group

UNDP United Nations Development Programme

UNEG United Nations Evaluation Group

UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

UNFPA United Nations Population Fund

UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund

UNIPP United Nations Indigenous People’s Partnership

UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

UNPRPD United Nations Partnership to Promote the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

WHO World Health Organization

 5

Executive Summary
The United Nations System has shown the importance and use of international norms
and standards for the UN Country Teams (UNCTs) in identifying and designing intervention
strategies in various contexts. While the particular instruments and mechanisms vary from
country to country, the common thread is the use of the human rights-based approach (HRBA)
in every case study. This report shows how different UN agencies, in widely different
situations, have developed and carried out joint programming for the implementation of
United Nations norms and standards. Tangible results also arose from the commitment of
Member States to review and reform their national legislation, norms and practices and align
these with international norms and standards. As a keeper of international norms and a
mentor for good practices, UN Country Teams have developed various interventions that are
based on the UN’s international norms and standards, but that are operationalized and
tailored to the specific needs of each country. A few examples of how UNCTs have used UN
normative instruments to support national priorities are the implementation of CEDAW
recommendations in Albania and Zambia, of Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities (CRPD) articles in Moldova, of ILO Conventions in Bolivia and of the Convention on
the Rights of the Child (CRC) in Yemen.

The case studies demonstrate the importance of long-term commitment and support
in complex contexts where the national legislation and practice may not be fully aligned with
international standards (e.g., Nepal and Yemen). In these cases, the role of the UN has been
critical in developing the capacity of civil society to claim and defend basic rights. Of particular
importance is the participatory approach that requires vigorous engagement, from the start, of
representative members and organizations of civil society in this process of national
empowerment and capacity development. Thus, the case studies identify important findings,
common approaches and lessons for the United Nations to continue to work collectively and
coherently by targeting five different levels:

1. Targeted advocacy, including through awareness-raising and identification of

champions within national constituencies, to promote UN universal values
2. Legislative change to ensure that national legislation is in line with international norms
and commitments
3. Capacity development to ensure that governments and civil society can implement the
6
international norms to which a given country has subscribed
4. Leveraging the work of relevant UN mechanisms – such as recommendations made by
universal periodic review, committees on the application of standards, treaty bodies,
special procedures and supervisory bodies of other UN conventions – as entry points
for UN interventions in support of national efforts
5. Promotion of wider stakeholder participation in development processes by using the
convening power of the UN as an impartial partner

The case studies present the following overall findings:

1. International norms and standards are the bedrock of the UN’s work at country level.
They represent the UNCT’s commitment and driving force for an integrated, people-
centred approach to ‘leave no one behind’. Human rights and gender equality are at
the heart of all of the case studies presented, regardless of the target group
concerned. Whether it is the rights of women (Zambia, Albania), of indigenous people
(Bolivia), of persons with disabilities (Moldova), of PLHIV (China/Fiji/Guatemala), of
children (Yemen) or of all human beings regardless of gender, sex or age (Mozambique
and Nepal), the commitment to and concern for the defence of human rights are the
foundation and cornerstone of the UN’s efforts.
2. Member States widely recognize the UN as an impartial, trusted and consequently
preferred development partner. This strong comparative advantage of the UN System
is sometimes insufficiently exploited in certain countries. The adoption of international
standards is an aspiration for all member countries, yet it is sometimes difficult for
them to accomplish alone. Nevertheless, the UNCTs need to continue to be vocal and
to advocate for these standards and values, as called for in the new UNDG guidance
for RC on human rights.
3. The UN’s international norms and standards are relevant and applicable in every
country context, whether in development or post-conflict and transition. By
integrating international normative standards into common programming, the UN
System can effectively support Member States in addressing the development needs
of the poorest and most vulnerable segments of society, regardless of the country
context, level of human development and geographical and cultural specificities.

The case studies identify the following lessons that can further success:
1. Leadership in the UN System is crucial. Having an RC with the strategic vision,
7
commitment and leadership contributes immensely to the success of the strategy (as
in Albania, Moldova and Nepal). In addition to the strong leadership role of the RC, a
strong and committed UNCT – including the leadership of relevant normative agencies
– is equally critical. As normative support of the UNCT increases, it becomes more
important than ever for the RC and UNCT to act as One Leader.
2. Delivering together is key to relevance and results. The UN’s international norms and
standards helped to forge a common goal and vision so that every agency could
contribute its best on the basis of its comparative advantage and area of competency.
Joint programmes with a division of labour that recognized the know-how and
technical capacity of the agencies enabled a more holistic and effective programming
strategy. Other programmes adopted less formal mechanisms for joint actions. Either
way, having a common framework and a clear structure enhanced implementation
and facilitated results.
3. Not all success drivers are technical or programmatic. While difficult to show and with
little quantitative evidence in this report to support this claim, communication, social
skills and sustained commitment – in other words, the human factor – are key
elements of success that must be recognized and incorporated into the planning of
strategic interventions. This also requires a good capacity for networking with national
partners (and donors where possible) and a degree of persuasion to show that
changes will produce a ‘win-win’ situation for all stakeholders.
4. Societal changes take time; no one should expect a ‘Cinderella effect’ from UN
interventions (i.e., Member State turning into an international standard champion on
the flip of the UN wand). In Albania, for instance, CEDAW was ratified in 1993, but the
country still needs assistance in implementing the recommendations. The efforts
regarding social protection in Mozambique started 10 years ago. The work on
transitional justice in Nepal started after the signing of the CPA in 2006 and, at the
time of the case study submission, the two transitional justice commissions were still
not functional. A sustained commitment from the UN is required and the process
should not be abandoned once the project’s or programme’s pro forma objectives
have been completed.
5. Success in applying international norms and standards is not always entirely
contingent on grand funding, especially if the entry points are strategic. This fact
clearly makes UN support efficient in terms of value-for-money. Of course, sufficient,
predictable and sustained funding will always remain indispensible for such work.
 6. As the UN moves away from service delivery and towards policy and normative
8
support, the UN must better communicate results in these areas. This requires ‘telling
the story’ of what has been achieved and how.

Many countries aspire to live up to their commitments to international standards, but

do not always have the necessary capacity or know-how to implement them. The UN, through
the country teams, has accumulated experience in supporting national efforts and promoting
wider and more inclusive processes. The report thus makes the following recommendations to
help countries achieve this, particularly with respect to the Agenda 2030:
1. Ensure that UNCTs fully embrace human rights-based approaches to programming as
the core of their work and use the UN Charter and the unique mandate of the UN
regarding human rights as a source of comparative advantage.
2. Ensure common understanding, language and advocacy regarding international norms
and standards. Not all agencies are equally focused on international norms and
standards, and their understanding of the relevance of these norms and standards to
their work may vary. Common messages from the principal actors regarding the
operationalization of international norms and standards would help to forge a
common vision and commitment across UN agencies.
3. Develop strong leaders and staff – including national staff – across the UN System who
can be agents for change and inspire governments and citizens to uphold the UN
values; rally the UN System to support them.
4. Use the UN’s international norms and standards to break down sectoral and
organizational silos to achieve inter-agency integration.
5. Ensure long-term commitment and support to the core UN values beyond the period
of a specific programme or the term of an individual RC or UNDAF programming
framework. In order to ensure continuity, investment in capacity development of UN
national staff and government and other national stakeholders with respect to the
core values of the UN is critical.
6. Develop staff capacity and skills to advocate the fundamental values of the UN’s
international norms and standards. Strengthen system-wide knowledge management
and sharing of thematic- and country-specific expertise, tools, experience and
knowledge.
7. Build the evidence base for development frameworks based on the application of
normative principles. Academic institutions and NGOs can have a valuable role in
developing national capacities. Led by national demand and in coordination with
 governments, the UN development system should explore opportunities to connect
9
academic institutions and NGOs, as such connections would improve the links between
research, practical learning and innovation.
8. Ensure that UNDAF Results Groups and other relevant coordination mechanisms
within UNCTs have normative and operational focus, capacity and policy support.
9. Strengthen regional UNDG teams’ role in quality assurance, including with respect to
the application of normative principles in development frameworks.
Introduction 10

In adopting the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, Member States stressed the
important role and comparative advantage of the UN System in supporting the achievement of
the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and sustainable development. Within the Economic
and Social Council (ECOSOC) dialogue for the longer-term positioning of the UN development
system, Member States also broadly agreed that key comparative advantages of the UN
System, such as its normative role, universal legitimacy, neutrality, global reach and convening
power, should guide UN functions in the post-2015 environment.
The General Assembly, through the quadrennial comprehensive policy review of
operational activities for development of the United Nations system QCPR, “encourages the
United Nations System to promote sustainable development outcomes through strengthening
normative and operational linkages within the United Nations system and, in this regard, to
direct particular efforts to supporting programme countries, at their request, in building
national capacity for inclusive, equitable, participatory, transparent and accountable national
development processes, in order to target and empower the poor and people in vulnerable
situations.” The United Nations Development Group (UNDG) has therefore defined within its
strategic priorities for 2013-2016 a series of targets that include “sharing of good practices and
lessons learned, and strengthening the normative approach and operational linkages, including
human rights and gender equality.”1
The new development agenda is “grounded in the UN Charter, the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, international human rights treaties” and other instruments,
including the Declaration on the Right to Development and its core aim to “realize the human
rights of all” (Preamble). To be ‘fit for purpose’, the UN System requires an understanding of
inequality and of the implications of reducing inequality and discrimination in accordance with
the UN’s human rights-based approach to sustainable development.

Based on previous reviews and analysis conducted under the UNDG, notably the 2011
CBI study “UNCTs engaging in national policy dialogue: Lessons from the field”, the primary
difficulty in ensuring successful linkages has been the lack of practical recommendations for
the integration of international norms and standards into the everyday work of the UNCTs. The
primary objective of the current report is therefore to identify, at the country level, those

1
UNDG Strategic Priorities 2013-2016, p. 7
cases where international norms and standards have been successfully applied to UN
11
programming.

The UN’s normative work is defined by the UN Evaluation Group (UNEG) as “the
support to the development of norms and standards in conventions, declarations, regulatory
frameworks, agreements, guidelines, codes of practice and other standard setting instruments
at global regional and national level. Normative work also includes the support to the
implementation of these instruments at the policy level, i.e., their integration into legislation,
policies and development plans, and to their implementation at the programme level.” 2 This
definition specifies three categories of normative work: “a) the development of norms and
standards, b) the support to governments and others to integrate the norms and standards
into legislation, policies and development plans; and c) the support to governments and others
to implement legislation, policies and development plans based on the international norms,
standards and conventions.”3

The credibility and value-added of the United Nations are based on its recognized
impartiality and political neutrality, on its technical capacity to help countries apply
international standards and norms and on its ability to ensure that international good
practices are followed. In carrying out the post-2015 agenda and meeting the challenges of
reaching the SDGs by 2030, these will be essential, as international norms and standards must
be the cornerstone of all UN intervention strategies through the sharing of a common vision
and framework.

2
UNEG Handbook for Conducting Evaluations of Normative Work in the UN System,
http://www.uneval.org/papersandpubs/documentdetail.jsp?doc_id=1484, 4 February 2014, p. 5
3
Ibid., p. 5
International norms and standards 12

The United Nations is the custodian of international norms and standards. These
include UN declarations, conventions, conferences and covenants and other mechanisms that
assist countries implement international norms and standards, all of which share core
universal values. These instruments allow countries to align their national legislations and
practices to international standards, most often with the active support of the United Nations.
The cornerstone of the UN values is the fundamental respect and commitment to the defence
of human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the
General Assembly in 1948. Other international agreements and instruments have since
reflected other aspects of the Member States’ commitment to universal values, elaborating
specific rights or categories of rights as well as the rights of specific groups.

Also a part of UN human rights standard-setting, the Convention on the Elimination of

All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) was adopted by the General Assembly
in 1979, showing the universal commitment towards gender equality and the empowerment
of women. In 1995, the Fourth Wold Conference on Women adopted the Beijing Declaration
and Platform of Action, recalling that a “transformed partnership based on equality between
women and men is a condition for people-centred sustainable development.”4 On 9 March
2015, the Commission on the Status of Women adopted a political declaration on the occasion
of the 20th anniversary of the Beijing Conference, calling on the UN System to continue to
support the full, effective and accelerated implementation of the Beijing Declaration and
Platform for Action.

In 1992 in Rio, the UN Conference on Environment and Development marked the

international community’s commitment to sustainable development, adopting ground-
breaking instruments regarding climate change, desertification and biological diversity, which
transformed international environmental law. Two decades later, the Rio+20 Conference led
Member States to develop the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 2030 Agenda
for Sustainable Development, building upon the achievements and lessons from the
Millennium Development Goals.

4
Beijing Platform of Action, RES/A/CONF.177/20 (1995), Annex II, § 1
 The UN has a broad range of instruments (see Annex 1) to help Member States to
13
meet their international commitments. In this, UN international norms and standards are a
driver of global transformation.
Integrating the normative and operational work of the UN could build on three main
ideas: 1) localizing the implementation of international norms and standards; 2) ensuring UN
programming that is norm based and; 3) feeding back operational experience into
international normative standard setting.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the changing policy environment

The emphasis on the normative and operational linkage takes place in a rapidly
changing UN development system. Adopted in September 2015, the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development marks a fundamental paradigm shift in the dominant model of
development, with a much broader – and more normative – approach than the MDGs. Its 17
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and related 169 targets mirror the international human
rights framework encompassing all civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including
the right to development. It includes dedicated goals on fighting inequalities and promoting
“more peaceful, just and inclusive societies as well as an enabling international environment”.
The Agenda is explicitly “grounded in the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, international human rights treaties” and other instruments, including the
Declaration on the Right to Development (§ 10). References to human rights permeate the
whole Outcome Document, establishing that the core aim of the SDGs to “realize the human
rights of all” (Preamble) and emphasizing “the responsibilities of all States […] to respect,
protect and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of
any kind” (§ 19). There are also a reaffirmation of some specific human rights, including those
to water and sanitation, labour rights, development and self-determination. The Agenda is
truly transformative commitment in that it is “to be implemented in a manner that is
consistent with the […] obligations of states under international law” (§ 18). Like the human
rights agenda, the Agenda is also universal, applicable to all Member States (§ 5).
The radical transformation brought about by the 2030 Agenda clearly puts the core of
the UN’s values and norms at the centre of the UN’s development intervention and calls upon
the UN System to become “fit for purpose”. This will entail a more systematic integration of
UN normative frameworks in relation to human rights (including fundamental rights and
principles at work), gender equality and the environment into UN operational activities; it will
14
also entail enhanced capacity of UN country presences to provide support on human rights
and the rule of law.

Enlisting UN joint programming/operations to support the implementation of international

norms and standards
The UN System has a common mandate to promote respect for international norms
and standards, including the principles of equality and non-discrimination, through the 1945
UN Charter. Member States agreed in Article 1 of the UN Charter that a core purpose of the
UN is “to achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic,
social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for
human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex,
language, or religion.“
The UN development system uses the United Nations Development Assistance
Framework (UNDAF) as the overall strategic planning document for implementing country
level operations. It brings together the UNCT and is regularly adjusted through mid-term and
final evaluations and reviews. The UNDAF preparation process has benefited from specific
guidelines that allow UNCTs to incorporate the UN values and principles into the country
strategy and programming. The UNDAF has played a key role strengthening normative and
operational linkages by UNCTs. According to the 2014 UNDG results report for example, 59 per
cent of UNCTs engaged with the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process, while 82 per cent
supported governments in mainstreaming human rights in national development policies and
programs. Moreover, 61 per cent of UNDAFs feature specific gender results at the outcome
level.
Within the UN reform process, one such example was the launch in 2007 of the
Secretary-General’s Delivering as One (DaO) initiative. Based on the report of the Secretary-
General’s High-Level Panel on System-Wide Coherence in 2006 and the support of the General
Assembly to further strengthen coordination and management of United Nations operational
activities, Albania, Cape Verde, Mozambique, Pakistan, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uruguay and Viet
Nam piloted an integrated approach of the UN System based on the ‘one leader, one budget,
one programme, one office’ principle. Four of the submissions and two of the selected case
studies in this report are from these DaO countries (Uruguay, Tanzania, Albania and
Mozambique). The United Nations has also been increasingly working with joint programme
models in which various agencies collaborate in a common programme and bring their specific
expertise within a holistic approach, shared vision and common goals.
The application of UN programming principles
15
All UN agencies have a common responsibility to promote the norms, standards and
principles of the UN System, particularly when framing UN country programming.
Intergovernmental negotiations for the adoption of the 2030 Agenda recognized human rights,
equality and sustainability as three fundamental principles. The 2010 UNDG guidance on the
application of the five programming principles to the UNDAF has helped UNCTs better
understand how to reflect international norms and standards into their common programming
work. The five programming principles used universally by UNCTs are:5

 Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA)

 Gender equality (GE)
 Environmental sustainability (ES)
 Capacity development (CD)
 Results-based management (RBM)

The first three principles are normative, while the last two are enabling.6 All have
defined the UN’s support to programming countries for the achievement of the MDGs and
remain increasingly relevant for the implementation of the post-2015 Sustainable
Development Agenda, particularly as greater focus is being placed on accountability and on
communicating results.
The three normative principles connect international norms, standards and goals to the
development process and are mutually reinforcing (see Figure 1). Where they intersect, they
spotlight:

Figure 1: Three reinforcing normative  Access to quality goods and services,

principles Environmental and control of resources, particularly for
Sustainability
Human Rights - Millennium Declaration & MDG7
- Rio Declaration and Agenda 21
- UN Charter
- Millennium Declaration
- 2005 World Summit
Access to,
and control of
- Declaration on Sustainable
Development and Plan of
vulnerable and excluded groups, including
ecosystem Implementation (WSSD)
- The Universal Declaration
resources (esp. - Multilateral Environmental
- Standards in 9 core human
rights treaties
- International labour
vulnerable,
excluded
Agreements (MEAs) in 3 clusters:
climate, biodiversity, chemicals.
women and girls
groups) - National action plans and reviews
standards
- Treaty body reports
- National laws, policies,
Shared
and plans
underlying
Increased role
principles


of women in
Empowerment of
women and girls and
decision-making
and their access to
Increased environmental and human
fulfillment of their and control over
human rights ecosystem
resources
rights protection, including the protection
Gender equality
- UN Charter (esp. Article 1)
- Millennium Declaration & MDG3
- TCPR 2004 & 2007
of women’s human rights
- 2005 World Summit
-Beijing Platform for Action
(4th WCW)
Shared Underlying Principles: - National action plans and
(1) Accountability reviews
(2) Public participation, inclusion
and access to information
(3) Equality and non-discrimination

5
UNDG, The Impact of UN Coordination: Stories from the Field, Synthesis of 2011/2012 Resident
Coordinator Annual Reports, p. 20
6
Taken from the UNDAF guidelines 2010
 The empowerment of women, girls and marginalized and excluded groups in decision-making
16
processes affecting their lives

The two enabling principles make the normative principles operational in the UNDAF. They
help to demonstrate effectiveness and accountability for the use of resources.

Capacity assessment and development provide the ‘how’. Capacity assessment and
development are means, not ends. UNCT-supported capacity assessments help to:

 ‘Unpack’ capacity needs identified by the normative principles

 Identify gaps between desired future capacities and current levels
 Help formulate capacity development strategies
Figure 2: Two enabling principles and expected results

Results-based management (RBM) makes it

Human
operational and helps to ensure accountability and to
Environmental
Rights Sustainability
Shared
underlying
Principles
connect analysis to planning and management, with:

Shared Underlying
Principles
Gender equality  Formulation of specific, measurable, achievable,
(1) Accountability
(2) Public participation,
Inclusion, and access
to information
relevant, time-bound SMART results with stakeholders
Capacity Development
 Arrangement of resources to achieve results
Results Based Management

 Functioning mechanisms and processes for

monitoring and reporting on UNDAF performance
 Use of UNDAF performance information with stakeholders for decision-making
 Use of lessons and good practices in the next UNDAF cycle

The norms and standards underpinning these principles are universal, so they are
applicable to all contexts and to all people in all countries. The normative principles are based
on law, internationally agreed development goals and treaties, national laws and
commitments. Moreover, they are relevant to government-UN cooperation, everywhere and
always. The conceptual framework can be applied to any programme intervention, in any
country, by any organization, for any of the development priorities, and with any partner.
Methodology 17

Under the UNDG Programming Working Group, a task team consisting of

representatives from DOCO, ILO, OHCHR, UN Women, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNEP and UNFPA
oversaw the development of the case studies. Specifically, the task team sought to show:

1. Practical examples of how norms and standards have been successfully used at the
UNCT level and how they have enhanced sustainable results and more equitable,
inclusive, participatory and transparent development processes

2. How UN-specialized agencies and departments with strong normative experience and
more operationally-oriented agencies have engaged in joint programmatic approaches

3. How the Delivering as One approach has achieved internal UN policy coherence and
jointly addressed cross-cutting issues, where applicable

4. Evidence of institutional capacity shifts and updated institutional arrangements to

respond to the normative-operational linkages, as well as to the post-2015 agenda

The task team also defined the following themes for the identification of the case
studies:

1. Facilitation of national engagement with human rights mechanisms and use of their
outputs via UN programming and policies in support of national efforts

2. Application of a human rights-based approach and a strengthening of gender equality

in areas such as economic empowerment, education, food, access to health care and
housing

3. Mainstreaming of human rights and promotion of gender equality in national

development planning and budgets

4. Achievement of full and productive employment and decent work for all, as guided by
the norms and standards of the ILO conventions

5. Promotion of environmental sustainability

6. Promotion of inclusive and peaceful society, including through access to justice, rule of
law and anti-corruption efforts

In August-September 2014, a call for case study proposals was issued to all UN Country
Teams; the call drew 24 proposals, which were reviewed against the following criteria:
 1. The extent to which the UN has addressed international norms and standards in an
18
integrated manner, involving more than one agency

2. Demonstrated impact of the normative/operational linkages approach on the

development issue in question (e.g., results focus, evidence of results achieved)

3. Potential for useful recommendations and lessons learned for global context (learning
value, transferability and replicability)

4. Balance of region and country context

This study is based on the UNEG norms and standards for Evaluation in the UN System,
2005. Although the study is not a formal evaluation report, a main concern has been to
validate the results obtained through proper evidence. Wherever possible, this included third-
party information, external evaluations, government sources and data, civil society and other
implementing partners’ data, media sources and articles, cross-validation with other UN
agencies, and triangulation of the documentation provided (i.e., confirmation by three
separate sources) to ensure that the findings and results were credible and evidence-based.
Case studies 19

Albania: Bringing women’s human rights home

Abstract

The case study covers the time from July 2007 to December 2014. UNDP had already
had a long presence in Albania, so the establishment of the UNIFEM/UN Women office in
Tirana (in 2007) allowed the two UN agencies to join forces to help the country contextualize
the CEDAW requirements and further advance women’s rights in policy and practice. Although
Albania had ratified the CEDAW in 1993, the country took 10 years to present its combined
initial and second periodic reports. The first CEDAW Committee’s concluding observations
became a work plan for Albania and a platform for the UN to support that country’s ambitions
to comply with international women’s rights standards.

Background

According to the UN Development Programme Human Development Index, the

country ranks 56 in the world, but, when factors related to gender empowerment are taken
into consideration, the country drops to a ranking of 72. The country is similarly ranked with
respect to women’s economic activity and representation in parliament (UNDP Human
Development Report, 2005).

Although there are no accurate national statistics concerning domestic violence in

Albania, some studies by Albanian NGOs reveal that the problem is serious and prevalent.
Indeed, almost 40 percent of women surveyed claimed to have been victims of regular physical
violence. As if this were not troubling enough, the percentage of abused women and girls in
rural areas is twice as high as that in cities (NHDR Report, 2005).

Discrimination against women and violence are closely interlinked. For that reason,
General Recommendation 19 of the CEDAW states that gender-based violence is a form of
discrimination that gravely affects women's enjoyment of their human rights. Although the
Albanian constitution and law guarantee women equality with men, Albanian women suffer
extreme gender-based discrimination.

According to Albania’s Common Country Assessment (CCA), gender inequality in

Albania exists primarily for two reasons: 1) the country is “a male-dominated society” where
women are seen as inferior to men and 2) the state machinery for the promotion of gender
equality and protection of women is weak. Indeed, Albanian society has a history of male
20
domination, a reflection of the strong patriarchal tradition in the Balkans. Women have been
taught to accept submissive roles. The problem of domestic violence is still not a topic of
necessary public discussion. In addition, women’s awareness about their rights in the family is
unsatisfactory. The idea that physical and psychological violence are somehow part of
marriage dominates in many cases. Poverty and unemployment have become the most
significant risks factors for women’s vulnerability to domestic violence, as they make it far less
likely or even impossible that abused women can leave their abusive partners.

Implementation strategy

UNDP and UN Women have followed a transformational and holistic strategy to

combat gender inequality from different angles, across sectors, at various levels and for a
sustained period of time. Various initiatives demonstrate this, including:
1. Support in developing the first and second National Strategies on Gender Equality
and Domestic Violence (2007-2010 and 2011-2015) inspired by CEDAW standards and
the CEDAW Committee concluding observations (the second strategy also contains a
costed action plan).
Technical support of Labour, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (at present
Ministry of Social Welfare and Youth) in drafting the Gender Equality Law and in
convincing members of parliament of its importance. The UN also mobilized the
national women’s movement to lobby and advocate for adoption of the law. The law
passed on 24 July 2008, stipulating a 30-percent quota in elected and nominated
decision-making positions. Subsequently, to ensure the implementation of the quota
provision for representation in parliament ahead of the 2009 general elections, the UN
advocated and provided technical expertise to political parties in introducing the quota
 in the Electoral Code (adopted in December 2008). The Gender Equality Law contains
21
provisions regarding the responsible organs for attaining gender equality and their
duties and adopts the CEDAW’s definition of gender discrimination, its prescribed
court procedures and its sanctions.
2. UNDP and UN Women engaged the best international and legal expertise to review
the Albanian legislation from the gender equality perspective and helped the
Ministry of Equal Opportunities to develop a comprehensive set of legal proposals to
remove discriminatory provisions from Albanian legislation. This normative and
CEDAW-compliant package is one of the priorities established by the Government of
Albania to advance its EU integration process.
3. Numerous trainings sought to equip relevant professionals (judiciary, lawyers, law
students, public administration, public oversight bodies, etc.) with a good
understanding of gender equality and of Albania’s international commitments
regarding women’s rights and with skills to interpret and apply national legislation
pertaining to gender. In particular, UNDP and UN Women supported the
establishment of gender equality focal points in line ministries (as foreseen in the
Gender Equality Law) and heavily supported the development of their technical skills
in mainstreaming gender and ensuring implementation of international and national
legislation. In order to translate UN support commitments into realities throughout the
country, the UN also helped municipalities develop local gender equality plans and to
budget for them, combined with awareness raising on equality between men and
women.

These efforts were articulated through a series of interventions. Initially, the project
Domestic Violence – No Longer a Family Issue operated from October 2006 until December
2008 primarily to support lobbying and implementation capacities of the new law against
domestic violence. It was comprised of three components:
1. Policy review for a protective legal and social environment for women who suffer
violence – Supported the formalization of the National Strategy and Action Plan
against domestic violence, development of implementing regulations on the basis and
for the implementation of the newly enacted Domestic Violence Law
2. Law enforcement and relief services through community coordination –Strengthened
the capacities of law enforcement institutions such as Ministry of Interior or
specialized NGOs and CBOs at the grassroots level to address domestic violence
 3. Raising awareness to change attitudes – Focused on prevention and empowerment
22
programmes in schools to change societal attitudes through broad awareness-raising
programmes, improved curricula and teacher training.

In continuation of these efforts, a new UN Joint Programme on Gender Equality in

Albania, entitled Support to the Implementation of the National Strategy for Gender Equality
and Domestic Violence (NSGE-DV) – Advancing Democratic Governance in Albania, was
operated from 2008 until 2011. This joint programme was implemented by four UN agencies
(UNIFEM, UNDP, UNFPA and UNICEF) and had four goals:
1. To give the national government capacity to more effectively monitor and implement
the NSGE-DV
2. To improve the public sector’s response to women’s needs and priorities at the local
level
3. To involve women in accountability processes that promote gender equality
4. To improve coordination of external support to government and civil society in
advancing gender equality
Progress and results
The UN’s efforts were significant, although changing mind-sets about gender
discrimination remains a work in progress and requires a continuous will to keep efforts in
gender mainstreaming and knowledge dissemination active for many years. However, national
mechanisms are being created and civil society and women’s organizations are taking up the
challenge and starting to demand their rights.

The two key results are structured around different axes, but are mutually supportive:
one in the legislative sector, the other in working with civil society and the general public.
1. The adoption of the Gender Equality Law in 2008, which led to the integration of the
30-percent quota requirement into the Electoral Code of 2008, is a key achievement.
In the 2005 national elections, only 7 percent of elected MPs were women. With the
introduction of the new quota system, the number of women elected in the 2009
national elections as MPs doubled to 16.4 percent, and further increased to 20.7
percent in the 2013 elections. .
2. Understanding and awareness about gender equality for all levels of society have
grown. As a result of the extensive public awareness and advocacy campaign in
support of the new legislation, the number of reported cases of domestic violence has
increased significantly, demonstrating increased awareness among citizens and
increased trust in the responsible bodies. From 2005 to 2009, the number of reported
 cases increased from 94 to 1,217; by the end of September 2010, that number had
23
grown to 1,483, reaching 3,094 by 2014. Requests for protection orders presented to
the courts by the police increased from 377 in 2008 to 859 in 2010, reaching 1,882 in
2014.

Outcomes
1. The number of women elected to parliament in 2009 was double that elected to the
previous parliament. These women became the main supporters for further
improvements in national legislation, such as the adoption of the Anti-Discrimination
Law of 2010 and the integration of a number of anti-sexual and gender-based violence
provisions into the Criminal Law (2012-2013).
2. Women lawyers’ organizations began to take the new norms developed under CEDAW
to a) support women seeking their rights in courts and other administrative bodies; b)
scrutinize courts’ application of CEDAW and domestic norms; and c) advocate for
further normative and judicial practice changes through strategic litigation cases.
3. Gender equality norms and strategic priorities also found way into other sectoral
policies such as the National Justice Sector Strategy, National Vocational Training and
Employment Strategy, National Action Plan for Women’s Entrepreneurship. A Council
of Ministers Decision required every ministry to include at least one objective in its
mid-term budgetary programme and action plans.
4. Increasing use of courts by women has contributed to courts referring explicitly to
CEDAW and Gender Equality Law provisions.
5. Awareness campaigns in implementation of the National Strategy on Gender Equality
have become smarter, focusing more on men and boys to challenge gender
stereotypes and combat gender-based violence. Politicians are starting to use the term
‘gender equality’ in their electoral campaigns and in their political programmes.
Lessons learned
1. Changing the mind-set of culturally rooted traditions takes time and requires a
sustained programmatic framework and long-term commitment from the UN, using
normative principles as the banner under which national priorities are developed.
2. Normative developments may serve as the driving force for gains in other aspects of
women’s human rights, so investing in these lays the groundwork for more solid future
interventions aiming at gender-transformative results.7

7
As defined by UNDP, the term ‘gender-transformative results’ explicitly seeks to redefine and
transform gender norms and relationships to redress inequalities and discriminations in social, economic
 3. Combined interventions in development of norms and policy design, in building skills
24
for understanding and applying those norms, in spreading knowledge of rights and
remedies and in building supporting partnerships with men and boys are more likely to
succeed not only in ensuring compliance of domestic laws with human rights
conventions, but also in supporting a more sustained and transformative change.
Therefore, working at multiple levels and in a holistic manner enhances the prospects
of positive global impact.
4. A good fit between UN agencies and their respective staff in terms of combination of
talents and funds, a relevant division of labour and mutual reinforcement of gender
equality messages in interaction with national counterparts, seems to be producing
visible results for Albania.
5. The case study may be equally applicable to most of the other States Parties to UN
norms, but it is especially relevant for EU aspirants and Council of Europe members
because EU women’s and human rights standards conform with UN standards and
compliance mechanisms; in accepting those standards, aspirant countries thus tacitly
accept UN standards and mechanisms.
6. While CEDAW was the trigger for Albania to seriously address gender equality issues,
an important enabling factor was the commitment and leadership of the UN Resident
Coordinator towards gender equality, which further enhanced the work of the four UN
agencies under the UN Joint Programme and under the Delivering As One modality
applied in Albania.

and political structures, norms, institutions and relations. The aim is to transform the systems and
institutions where inequalities are created and maintained; this involves the redistribution of power,
control and resources.
Mozambique: Promoting social protection floors
25
Abstract

The case study deals with the establishment of a social protection platform for
Mozambique through the collaborative efforts of the UN Country Team. UNICEF, ILO and WFP
are working at different levels to support the development of a social protection floor for the
country. Efforts started in 2005 and have been ongoing for 10 years, with key inputs at
different stages. Previously, the UN Country Team had different projects that were not
connected with each other and there was little shared understanding about social protection.
The ILO standards on the Social Protection Floor (SPF) provide an overarching framework for
the government to have a holistic approach to social protection while also providing the tools
that allow the definition of priorities though the Assessment-Based National Dialogue (ABND).
The ability to cost the benefits with a long-term perspective has allowed the government to
increase coverage of beneficiaries while also reviewing the budget allocation for social
protection.

Background

The ILO Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (No. 202), adopted by the
International Labour Conference, reaffirms that “the right to social security is a human right”
and that social protection is universal, “based on social solidarity”. It also recalls previous
international labour standards that are of relevance and “important references for social
security systems”. The four guarantees defined under ILO Recommendation No. 202 – access
to essential health care and basic income security for children, for persons in active age unable
to earn sufficiently and for older persons – offer a rights-based framework. Conducting
Assessment-Based National Dialogue is a useful first step to assess a country’s current offers
and gaps in terms of social protection (SP) schemes and to promote an inclusive national
dialogue on social protection policy options.

Mozambique is at the initial stages of developing its social protection systems.

Together with the UN Country Team, the government identified the Social Protection Floor
framework and the Assessment-Based National Dialogue as central tools in defining national
policies and implementation frameworks in social protection.

Over the last two decades, Mozambique’s economy has grown at unprecedented
speed. However, this has not translated into equal progress in poverty reduction and human
development. There is a large consensus now that social protection is a crucial instrument to
accelerate the reduction of extreme poverty and to accelerate progress to the MDG objectives.
For this reason, the country is now establishing sound policy and institutional frameworks to
26
deliver effective social protection mechanisms.8

The UN was recognized amongst cooperating partners for its capacity and unique
expertise at the macro level in the areas of social protection financing and the establishment
of a rights-based legal and institutional framework, grounded in international social security
standards.
Implementation strategy

With the central objective of promoting capacity-building of national stakeholders, the

intervention strategy has three main axes: 1) technical assistance to the development of
policies and systems; 2) training (including in-job training); and 3) knowledge development. In
practical terms, the initiative comprises practical assistance with specific economic feasibility
studies, legal expertise, support to national dialogue processes and advice on the governance
and administrative aspects of implementing national social protection floors; this reflects the
principles of ILO Recommendation No. 202. The initiative also includes a regional peer learning
process promoting a South-South approach. As countries from the South move forward in their
development process, they can have a more active role in the shaping of the development
agenda, and their experience and lessons learned become relevant to addressing global
challenges. Innovative solutions from the South are increasingly being shared among
developing countries as South-South cooperation9 enables strategic partnerships that are seen
as coherent and essential initiatives to propel development.

8
For instance, the UNDAF 2007-09 established within its human capital cooperation area the objective
of extending social protection to vulnerable groups such as children, youth and women. The Joint
Programme on Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality, which ran from May 2007 to December
2011, had an important role in promoting training and communication material on legislation protecting
women worker’s rights, in particular ILO Convention No. 100 on equal remuneration, No. 111 against
discrimination in employment and No. 183 on maternity protection.
Within this context, Mozambique approved the Law on Domestic Violence against Women (Law
29/2009) and the Law for the Prevention and Combat against Trafficking in Persons, particularly Women
and Children (Law 6/2008). Final Programme Narrative Report of the Joint Programme on Women’s
Empowerment and Gender Equality (MOZ0853OUF), December 2011.
9
In March 2012, the Governing Body of the ILO adopted a strategy to promote South-South and
triangular cooperation, which reaffirms that South-South and triangular cooperation is paramount to
the mainstreaming of the Decent Work Agenda. The ILO’s strategy is consubstantiated in the policy
document ‘South–South and triangular cooperation: The way forward’, which states:
“South-South and triangular cooperation is a manifestation of solidarity among the countries and
peoples of the South that contributes to their national well-being, national and collective self-reliance,
and the attainment of internationally agreed development goals, including the Millennium Development
Goals. South-South and triangular cooperation should not be seen as official development assistance,
but as a partnership among equals based on solidarity, and is not a substitute for, but rather a
complement to, North–South cooperation. From this stems the concept of ‘triangular cooperation’,
which is defined as South–South cooperation supported by a Northern partner. South-South and
 There is considerable potential for promoting social security through South-South and
27
triangular cooperation via the Community of Portuguese Language Countries (CPLP), whose
current Member States are Angola, Brazil, Cabo Verde, Guinea-Bissau, Equatorial Guinea,
Mozambique, Portugal, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Timor-Leste. To this end, at the 12th
Ministerial Meeting on Work and Social Affairs, held in Maputo from 23-25 April 2013,
ministers discussed the challenges related to social protection and food security. Indeed, these
countries signed the Maputo Declaration, which highlights the efforts of the CPLP to adopt
public policies that foster the creation and consolidation of social protection systems in line
with the concept of the ‘social protection floor’ approved by the International Labour
Organization.10

Three UN agencies share most efforts of the UN System: the ILO, which focuses mainly
on the policy level; UNICEF, which works on system development; and WFP, which is engaged
at the micro-implementation level.

triangular cooperation takes different and evolving forms, including, inter alia, the sharing of knowledge
and experience, training, and technology transfer. It embraces a multi-stakeholder approach.”
http://ilo.org/gb/GBSessions/GB313/pol/WCMS_172577/lang--en/index.htm
10
The Maputo Declaration also reaffirms the joint commitment of the CPLP Member States to
implement social protection measures to address poverty and vulnerability as well as emergency
situations in the CPLP sphere. It also asserts the political will to improve coordination in order to
continue strengthening policies and programmes aimed at extending social protection and combatting
child labour. In addition, it advocates for a renewed support for South-South and triangular cooperation
as a means to contribute to the implementation of the Decent Work Agenda and its four strategic
objectives in the framework of the CPLP, with a special focus on combatting child labour, strengthening
the role of labour inspection and promoting social protection.
http://www.cplp.org/Files/Billeder/cplp/redes/TrabSegSocial/01_Dec-Map_XIIRMTAS_CPLP.pdf
 UN Joint Programme on Social Protection
Mozambique is a flagship country for the One UN Initiative, which promotes increased 28
coordination between clusters of UN agencies. Since 2007, the United Nations Children
Fund (UNICEF), the World Food Programme (WFP) and the International Labour
Organization (ILO) have collaborated with the Ministry of Women and Social Action
(MMAS) and the Ministry of Labour (MITRAB), to develop and expand the social protection
system. The National Institute for Social Action (INAS), the executive arm of MMAS, is the
main implementing partner. The Ministry of Planning and Development (MPD) and the
Ministry of Finance are also involved. This collaboration, led by the Government of
Mozambique, is considered a ‘best practice’ of One UN Joint Programme support in the
establishment of a national SPF.
The UN Joint Programme on Social Protection was created to support MMAS and INAS in
strengthening their planning and budgeting capacity, evaluating existing social protection
programmes, developing the National Strategy for Basic Social Security (ENSSB) and
improving coordination and implementation.
From the government's point of view, UN joint planning is important because it diminishes
the administrative and transaction costs for government, ensures greater accountability
and more transparency when assessing results and guarantees that resources are directed
at the priority areas established by the ENSSB. ‘‘Before, we had to deal with multiple
partners, with various priorities and different approaches. It was extremely complicated.
Sometimes the objectives overlapped; sometimes they wanted to finance the same areas.
It was difficult to direct them to the priorities. With this joint approach, we know which
partners we need to deal with regarding which issues,’’ reflects Elsa Alfai, MMAS.
From the perspective of the UN agencies, the joint approach creates a stronger political
voice for the UN, increases delivery, reduces fragmentation and replication and improves
the credibility of UN agencies as providers of technical assistance and evidence-building. It
also contributes to more coordinated action between UN agencies and the government and
strengthens the position of UN partners within the Social Action Group under
Mozambique’s Poverty Reduction Action Plan 2011-2014.

Progress and results

In the political sphere, social protection has become more important among
programmatic tools. In parallel, the reinforcement of legal tools, including the Social
Protection Law, the Regulation on the Basic Social Security Subsystem and the Regulation on
the Coordination of the Compulsory Social Security System, also plays an important role in the
institutionalization of social protection.

Outcomes
1. The results came with the approval of the National Strategy for Basic Social Security11
in 2010, and, particularly after 2011, with the increasing fiscal space allocated by the

11
The National Strategy for Basic Social Security (ENSSB) was adopted by the government through
Resolution No. 17/2010 of 27 May 2010. It defines the guidelines and actions for basic social protection
 government to the sector. Figures indicated an increase from 0.18 percent of GDP in
29
2008 to 0.5 percent in 2014 and translated into an increase in the number of
beneficiaries from 167,000 to 440,000. At the same time, the amount of transfers
more than doubled.
‘‘We faced social pressures to respond more efficiently to the problems of more
vulnerable groups. Although we had already implemented programmes, there was a
call for stronger, broader programmes. That opportunity led us to analyse, in a much
deeper way, what we were doing,” recalls Elsa Alfai, MMAS. “The Prime Minister
contacted the ILO and the IMF to discuss the role of social protection in mitigating the
impacts of the food and fuel crisis. This created a very important opening; several
government leaders began to better understand the concepts and the positive impact
that social protection could have in improving people’s lives.”
2. The government currently finances 90 percent of its programmes.
Lessons learned
1. It is critical to respect the government’s pace and ownership to ensure sustainable
changes. Ownership must be built from within the government.
2. Investing in the development of technical knowledge among key agents and
ministries is necessary to successfully increase political influence. Capacity
development is a necessary, integral part of the holistic support provided.
3. Alliances with international actors, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF),
have been essential for funding.
4. Having a coordinated approach enables the UN System to have a stronger political
voice. It increases its delivery and coordination capacity regarding social protection by
avoiding fragmentation and redundancy and improves the agencies’ credibility.
5. The creation of strong UN teams around the concept of Social Protection Floors
reinforces the capacity of the UN System to promote a rights-based approach in
social protection. Because it is not always possible to promote immediate universal
coverage, advocating for a rights-based framework should influence the policymaking
and the implementation levels. Creating a common understanding around social

2010-2014, ensured not only by the Ministry of Women and Social Action but also by other institutions
such as the Ministries of Health, Education and Justice. The ENSSB includes social assistance
programmes focused on those who are extremely poor and lack the physical capacity for work,
development programmes focused on those who are extremely poor but have the physical ability to
work, and social services providing institutional support to people in vulnerable situations. "Estudo
sobre a aplicação das Convenções n.° 138 e n.° 182 da OIT e suas recomendações na legislação nacional
dos países da CPLP", ILO-CPLP, December 2012, pp. 35-52.
http://www.cplp.org/Files/Billeder/MIC_CTI/PALOP_Studies_Mozambique_PT_Web.pdf
 protection, spread over multiple layers of the society, is essential to making social
30
protection part of the social contract and building a more inclusive society.
6. Strong importance of the participatory process used to develop the strategy led to
greater buy-in from government and civil society.
‘‘During that process, the key stakeholders began to move in the same direction. It
fostered greater understanding of social protection and enabled the development of
the system,’’ reports Olívia Faite, Head of the Social Assistance Department, INAS.
7. The establishment of medium- and long-term programmatic tools as enablers for
developing adequate social protection response was important.
Yemen:12 Cooperation on strengthening the juvenile justice system in Yemen
31

Abstract
In order to implement the international norms and standards to which Yemen is a
signatory, UNICEF and OHCHR have been working to strengthen the juvenile justice system in
Yemen through reform of national legislation, cooperating to eradicate the juvenile death
penalty and advocating against some traditional harmful practices such as child marriage and
female genital mutilation (FGM). Important results, such as the suspension of three cases of
juvenile death sentences by the President of Yemen, have been achieved through joint UN
advocacy, while awareness is being raised and technical capacity is being developed within
government and civil society to support the drafting of legislation in line with the Convention
on the Rights of the Child. In January 2014, the National Dialogue Conference in Yemen, which
involved various Yemeni political, social, age and gender groups, concluded its deliberations
and came out with sets of outcomes to mark the political, economic and legislative future of
Yemen. These included clear outcomes in relation to defining the ‘age of the child’, agreeing to
set the minimum age for marriage and criminalizing harmful social practices such as FGM.
Background
In recent years, Yemen has faced social and political challenges to socio-economic
development. The associated deterioration of the security situation has been particularly harsh
for women and children. The civil unrest that erupted in 2011, in which there were calls for
political and economic reform, ended with a peaceful transfer of power. However, while the
transitional government is in its third year, there continues to be uncertainty.
Children in Yemen face serious challenges. Yemeni national legislation is not fully
compatible with international standards, including with respect to its lack of determination of
the age of majority (juvenile justice law and children’s rights law, for example, differently
define the age of majority). Accordingly, with the low birth registration rate (22 percent),
Yemen is one of the few remaining countries in the world that still apply the death penalty to
child perpetrators. Furthermore, there is no minimum legal age for marriage. In addition, social
norms and traditions still support FGM, regardless of its physical and psychological
implications. Children in contact with the law have been and continue to be especially
vulnerable; for most of them, diversion from the criminal court system is impossible.
Consequently, children’s rights are violated daily in Yemen.
Implementation strategy

12
This case study was developed before the war erupted in Yemen on 26 March 2015.
 Since May 2013, the OHCHR and UNICEF have been coordinating actions to
32
strengthen the juvenile justice system in Yemen. While working under separate projects, both
agencies have been collaborating closely in order to make the juvenile justice system
compliant with international norms. For example, while UNICEF reviewed national legislation
to identify gaps and to highlight inconsistency related to children’s rights, OHCHR developed a
Country Situation Note to help the government align its legislative framework with
international human rights standards. This strategy sought to work within the national system,
as the new Government of Yemen wished to incorporate international standards into its own
legislation and practice.

Two critical entry points were:

1. Children under Yemeni law are considered to be objects rather than subjects of
rights and social actors; there is no accountability for crimes committed by parents
or legal guardians, such as torture, FGM and corporal punishment, as well as regarding
forced marriages. As the law does not ensure the protection of children, it was
necessary to advocate for change of the law.
2. There are children in Yemen on ‘death row’. When the government agreed to open
the central prison to the UN to undertake a survey, the size of the problem surprised
everyone, even though penal law states that no one under 18 should be executed. This
raised concerns by children’s rights activists and created momentum to change the
law.
The shared implementation strategy and joint efforts were grounded on the following
components:

1. Reviewing national legislation in Yemen to identify gaps, highlight contradictions and

assess compatibility with international standards
2. Supporting the drafting of a new children’s rights law that addresses previous
limitations and stipulates the age of majority in line with international standards,
including by setting the minimum age of criminal responsibility at 12 and the upper
age for juvenile justice at 18 instead of at 15. Additionally, the new draft law includes
provisions on criminalizing harmful social practices such as FGM and proposes to set a
minimum legal age for marriage.
3. Supporting a programme to build the capacity of law enforcement bodies (police,
judges, and prosecutors), social workers, community leaders and civil society
 organizations in order to improve their skills, knowledge and behaviour in dealing
33
with children in conflict with the law.
4. A focused advocacy programme on eradicating juvenile death penalty, which has
involved direct contacts with the President’s Office, the Supreme Court, the media and
civil society organizations. This issue was also included in the fourth periodic report by
the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the human rights situation in Yemen that
was submitted to the Human Rights Council in July 2013 (A/HRC/24/34).
5. Joint advocacy efforts to ensure the adoption of the new children’s rights law by the
government.
6. Jointly campaigning for three cases of juvenile offenders sentenced to death. As their
age was not properly verified, the programme supported the approval and creation of
a forensic committee to investigate their age and the age of all child-offenders accused
of capital offenses.
7. Supporting the engagement of individuals, civil society and others with UN human
rights mechanisms, namely the Committee on the Rights of the Child.
8. Monitoring, documenting and reporting on human rights violations, including
children’s rights violations
Progress and results
1. The draft of the proposed children’s rights law is currently under discussion in the
Cabinet and is to be forwarded to Parliament for final endorsement. Currently, an
interministerial committee is reviewing the draft law with support from UNICEF and
OHCHR. The UN is working with and supporting the Ministry of Legal Affairs to conduct
targeted advocacy to ensure ratification by Parliament.
2. Because of the joint advocacy work between UNICEF and OHCHR, the President of
Yemen has ordered the suspension of three juvenile death sentences that the
previous president had approved; the president has an ordered the Supreme Court to
reinvestigate these cases, including the ages of the juveniles. Furthermore, another 51
cases involving death sentences handed down by first instance courts, appeal courts or
supreme courts were suspended and the President ordered that an independent
forensic committee determine the ages of the juveniles at the time of their offences.
The President also ordered that the forensic committee review all cases involving
children accused of severe offences.
Outcomes
34
1. Increased collaboration between two UN agencies to help the National Constitutional
Drafting Committee incorporate the National Dialogue Conference outcomes into the
new constitution, specifically with a focus on children’s rights. OHCHR is further
supporting the Committee on the overall human rights framework to ensure that the
Constitution is in line with international human rights standards.
2. UNICEF hired a legal expert to lead on the National Technical Reform Committee and
the associated legal review. This review was later used by the Ministry of Legal Affairs
to inform the drafting process of the new children’s rights law.
3. A Memorandum of Understanding has been developed between the Ministry of
Human Rights, the Higher Council for Motherhood and Childhood, the Coordination
Commission for Yemeni NGOs for Children’s rights, UNICEF and the OHCHR in order to
establish a national observatory on the rights of the child in Yemen. The Minister of
Human Rights is committed to including national independent human rights in
institutions based on the Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (the
Paris Principles) as a priority and the creation of the National Observatory will be part
of the national human rights institutions.

Lessons learned

1. The willingness of the Government of Yemen to apply the international standards to

which it has subscribed, and the current transitional government that offers a chance
to engage on the compatibility between the national legislation and practices and
international standards as it relates to juvenile justice, were the triggers and entry
points that allowed the UN to successfully pursue efforts. Another enabling factor has
been the commitment of the Minister of Human Rights.
2. A more formal coordination structure is desirable between UN agencies, as is having
joint working modalities defined with agreed upon tasks and responsibilities for
systematic support and collaboration. At the same time, international norms and
standards helped to forge a common understanding between the two agencies on
how to address the issue. Such a common basis helped in having ongoing follow-up;
continuous support and joint interventions were timely. This was done through
bilateral meetings creating common platforms such as the UN working group on the
Rule of Law chaired by OHCHR by and ensuring a regular flow of communication that
 allowed both agencies to follow up on progress, discuss obstacles and agree on the
35
way forward.
3. Developing the capacity of key national stakeholders is critical for success and
longer-term sustainability. UNICEF’s Justice for Children project includes a strong
capacity-building component of government and civil society counterparts that
improves the juvenile justice sector.
4. Getting interministerial level support and civil society organizations on board for the
establishment of a National Technical Reform Committee for the legislative review
was key to ensuring local ownership of the process and gaining local support.
5. Given the challenges of operationalizing children’s rights, this case is a model that best
focuses on similar normative rights frameworks that require capacity and reform
rather than large-scale service delivery.
Moldova: UNCT Strategic Action Plan supporting CRPD implementation
36

Abstract
In 2012, the UNCT Moldova was invited to submit project ideas for funding under the
UN Partnership to Promote the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNPRPD) Fund in the
context of its first Call for Proposals (UNPRPD Round 1). The intervention was designed with
four mutually reinforcing components led by OHCHR, UNDP, UNICEF and WHO. The
objectives, particularly the critical entry points, were developed in an open process engaging
all UN entities under strong RC leadership. Drawing from the expertise and comparative
advantage of working on disability and human rights, the four UN entities finalized the project
details and were responsible for project implementation, which gave strategic support for
implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The
programme directly fit with the United Nations-Republic of Moldova Partnership Framework
(UNPF) 2013–2017, which includes targeted human rights outcomes under UNPF Pillar 1 and
mainstreamed human rights commitments throughout.
Background

Moldova, with a population of 3,559,541, has more than 176,000 persons with disabilities.
Although the population has decreased by 2 percent within the last 10 years, the total
number of persons with disabilities has increased by 20 percent. Mental and intellectual
disabilities are among the top five areas of disability in Moldova. In 2010, approximately
60,000 persons were under psychiatric supervision. Of the total number of persons with
disabilities in the country, annual growth rate of primary disability is about 9 percent.
Research indicates that persons with mental or intellectual disabilities are more vulnerable
to exploitation, violence and abuse and other losses of human rights. At its first Universal
Periodic Review in October 2011, the Government of Moldova committed to continue
efforts to combat discrimination on grounds of disability. In addition, the government has
committed, as recommended by the Committee on the Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights, to removing legal and practical obstacles that prevent or limit the persons with
mental or intellectual disabilities from fully exercising their fundamental human rights
(E/C.12/MDA/2).
Background
37
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) and its Optional
Protocol, which is one of nine ‘core’ international Human Rights treaties, was adopted by the
UN General Assembly on 3 December 2006 and entered into force in May 2008. The UNCT
Moldova directed its efforts in advancing normative standards of the CRPD at the country level
by promoting its ratification, inspired by the unprecedentedly participatory and inclusive
process of drafting the Convention at the international level that had capacitated people with
disabilities and their representing organizations involved along with the state representatives
in the lead at all stages, from the beginning of the negotiations in 2002 until the work was
finalized in August 2006.

In Moldova, the understanding of the human rights and disability situation, of the
capacity and technical assistance needs of the state and of the priorities of the disabled
peoples’ organizations (DPOs) and the other human rights organizations working to advance
the rights of persons with disabilities, was shaped throughout a long-lasting process of
cooperation that began in 2009.

In the early phase of cooperation in 2009 and 2010, the UN entities provided extensive
support for consolidating the voices of persons with disabilities to promote ratification of the
CRPD and to build states’ understanding of the importance of adhering to the UN’s
international norms and standards; this was necessary at the outset in order to ensure states’
willingness to ratify the Convention.

Consequently, the question of whether and how to translate the principles of the
CRPD and its ground-breaking vision into the national legislation and policies was to be
handled by the UN OHCHR, UNICEF, UNDP and WHO after the September 2010 ratification.
UN efforts worked to build the political will to bring domestic law into line with international
human rights standards, leveraging in particular the county’s ambitions for European
integration and the comparative advantage and convening power of the UN to facilitate
dialogue among national authorities, broader civil society and disabled persons’ organizations.
The fully CRPD-compliant Law on the Social Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities came into
force in late 2011.

While Moldova ratified the CRPD and adopted a national law on the rights of persons
with disabilities, the government lacked the capacities to translate the law from the books
into concrete actions. The call for proposals under the UNPRPD Fund in 2012 provided an
opportunity for the UNCT to develop a consolidated support of the government and civil
38
society to implement the law, to develop targeted plans and to carry out concrete activities.
The UNCT proposal was accepted and, under the UNPRPD, four UN agencies divided
the labour, with each agency primarily responsible for the achievement of the outcomes under
each of the five pillars as described under the implementation strategy (see table below).
Implementation strategy
The actual implementation began in January 2013 and lasted 24-months in order to
ensure completion of the original scope of work and to meet the expectations regarding the
reforms concerning legal capacity, deinstitutionalization, inclusive education and torture in
psychiatry. Throughout implementation, the four partner agencies had quarterly meetings to
assess progress, discuss challenges and potential threats to the successful implementation and
strategize further steps. In addition, UN implementing partners used, on a quarterly basis, the
already existing governmental platforms, such as the National Council on Disability and the
National Council on Child Protection, to bridge and consolidate partnerships across different
partner ministries and other state entities directly responsible for the outcomes of the
intervention. To make the intervention fully effective and more responsive, persons with
disabilities and their representative organizations participated in meetings with state
stakeholders on the National Council on Disability and in quarterly consultations with the UN
implementing agencies.

Project architecture

Each of the four participating UN agencies has taken a specific responsibility using the
CRPD articles as entry points:

Article
Agency Content

OHCHR (lead) & UNDP 12 Equal recognition before the law

OHCHR & UNDP (lead) 13 Access to justice for persons with disabilities on
an equal basis with others

WHO (lead), UNICEF, 19 The right to live independently and to be

OHCHR & UNDP included in society

UNICEF (lead) & OHCHR 24 The right to education

OHCHR & UNDP (lead) 33/29 National monitoring and implementation/

 empowerment of persons with disabilities (PWD)
39

Synergies of work were ensured mainly by the great commitment of the Human Rights
Adviser (originally placed by OHCHR and co-funded by the UNCT agencies) and the strong
support of the RC. General secretarial assistance was provided by the National Human Rights
Officer, who facilitated: dialogue amongst the implementing partners; narrative quarterly and
annual reporting to the donors and the board; coordination of schedules; the tracking of
events and deadlines for intervention; and liaising with the UNPRPD technical secretariat.

The UN implementing team benefited from consultation with Headquarters, as in the

case of the involvement of the UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights. During
implementation, it also found guidance in the recommendations, issued by the Special
Procedure mandate holders who visited the country, on measures to improve the
intervention’s outcomes; these visitors included the special rapporteur on the rights of persons
with disabilities and the special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights.
Progress and results

Building on previous efforts since 2009, a key result was greater collaboration on
disability rights across the UNCT, the government and disabled people’s organizations in
Moldova. The intervention brought together: four UN entities; four ministries (i.e., the
Ministries of Education, Social Protection, Justice, Health and Finance) and other state
institutions and ministries under the coordination of the vice-prime minister; and civil society
organizations and disabled people’s organizations which formed a national independent
monitoring mechanism to promote the rights of persons with disabilities. This collaboration
among all stakeholders produced outcomes at different levels:
1. Within the UNCT, sensitivity toward disability grew. This mainstreamed disability into
new support interventions by agencies either individually or in partnership with other
members of the UN family. Benefits included: the physical accessibility of the UN
building was ensured; two women with disabilities were hired to coordinating
positions on the UN staff; accessibility for persons with disabilities was required for UN
procurement; and three new programmes mainstreamed disability and human rights.

2. Increased familiarity of Moldovan disabled persons’ organizations with international

human rights policies regarding disability, the UN System and the diplomatic
community. Examples of such fruitful engagement are: the participation of Moldova’s
National Independent Monitoring Mechanism to the High-Level Meeting on disability
 and development in the context of shaping the post-2015 Agenda in September 2013;
40
participation of Moldovan women with disabilities in the CEDAW country review
process in November 2013; participation of the Moldovan disability rights community
in the drafting process for CRPD General Comment No. 1 (2014) on Equal Recognition
Before the Law.
3. The first Organization of Users of Psychiatry was created and empowered to
participate in the promotion of disability rights. Experts participated at every major
event in order to guarantee that the voices of persons with disabilities were at the
forefront of the project. As a result of UNPRPD support, this organization convened
and filed a request for official registration with the Ministry of Justice. The group
commented on CRPD Committee Draft General Comment on Article 12: Equal
recognition before the law. UNPRPD began work to create independent bodies that
will monitor the implementation of the Convention, in line with its Article 33(2).
4. Strengthened capacities of judges to consider standards of international law in cases
that contravene provisions of domestic law. One case, in Chisnau, involved a judge
who rejected the application that the parents of an 18-year-old woman had lodged
seeking to have her declared mentally incompetent. The free legal aid lawyer
representing the interests of the girl and the judge assigned to the case had both
participated in trainings on CRPD Article 12 organized within the framework of the
project. Judges have also begun to require the application of a provision of the Civil
Code that provides for a form of supported decision-making instead, as required by
Article 12 of the CRPD. Furthermore, due to the extensive advocacy efforts of the
UNPRPD project, the Deputy Prime Minister firmly committed in February 2013 to
place the implementation of CRPD Article 12 on the government agenda.
Subsequently, an interministerial working group developed, with assistance from the
project, a Draft Law on Support in Exercising Legal Capacity, which proposes to replace
the current guardianship system with supported decision-making. The government is
currently reviewing the draft law. Influenced by research carried out by the project,
the President of the Supreme Court of Justice issued a judgment on the right to legal
capacity for persons with psychosocial and intellectual disabilities. Civil Code reform of
guardianship provisions was planned amidst wider Civil Code reform during 2014 and
is a government commitment within Moldova’s current National Human Rights Action
Plan.
5. Increased capacity of local authorities to support children with disabilities in
accessing quality mainstream education in their communities. The government was
 capacitated to develop a national body for the coordination and methodological
41
guidance of inclusive education processes, the National Centre for Psycho-pedagogical
Assistance. After the pilot phase of the programme, the government decided to
extend psycho-pedagogical assistance services to each of the 35 districts and
municipalities of Moldova, with partial support of UNPRPD. Furthermore, the
Ministry of Education identified the allocation of adequate resources, including
funding from the state budget, as a priority for 2013. In order to further
institutionalize these advancements, a study of the regulatory framework for inclusive
education was conducted and a series of changes introduced to the Code on
Education. Additionally, a national curriculum on inclusive education was developed
and more than 500 teachers and educational administrators were trained at the
national and local levels. The National Bureau of Statistics adopted indicators on
inclusive education and guidelines to support improved data collection that will
improve the monitoring of the progress of the project’s interventions.

6. Access to effective independent complaint mechanism and judicial representation for

people from psychiatric hospitals and social care homes.
7. Effective capacity of the National Council on Prevention and Elimination of
Discrimination to act effectively on cases of discrimination on grounds of disabilities
in all areas of life (employment, health care, education, justice, etc.);
8. Ability of persons with psychosocial or mental disabilities to work with
governmental bodies on developing integrated socio-medical support services,
necessary to support living and inclusion in the community and to prevent
hospitalization. In December 2013, the Moldovan Ministry of Labour, Social Protection
and Family began review of a draft National Strategy and Action Plan on Adult
Deinstitutionalization, developed in consultation with representative organizations of
persons living with psychosocial and mental disabilities with the support of the
UNPRPD project. Starting in January 2014, mental health care was integrated into
primary health care and community health centres opened in every region to ensure
that persons with psychosocial disabilities can enjoy their right to independent living in
their own communities, as required by Article 19 CRPD. Consequently, new
admissions to residential institutions have slowed and some current residents were
reintegrated into their communities of origin. Parallel to the work on
deinstitutionalization, extensive support was provided to the Ministry of Health to
implement the National Mental Health Programme 2012-2016. A major milestone in
 this process was the decision – adopted by the Ministry of Health Collegium – to
42
create community mental health centres in all districts of the country, starting on 1
January 2014. The centres will be essential in the decentralization of psychiatric care
and the integration of mental health services into the primary health care system.
9. In Moldova, the UNPRPD supported the piloting of an Ombudsperson for Psychiatry,
an independent complaint and monitoring mechanism intended to ensure that
persons in psychiatric facilities have access to effective remedy in case of violations of
their rights. The impact of the Ombudsperson was felt at the level of individuals (who
were able to successfully bring forward complaints about abuses they had
experienced) as well as across the broader psychiatric system (where awareness of
CRPD provisions significantly increased). In September 2013, at the end of her visit to
Moldova, UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights Magdalena
Sepulveda stated, “I was favourably impressed with the pilot Ombudsperson for
Psychiatry arrangement, as well as with the positive changes and human rights
scrutiny provided by the arrangement. I urge the Government to swiftly formalize and
fully institutionalize the position of Ombudsperson for Psychiatry.” Based on the
positive changes brought about in the Moldovan psychiatric system by the
Ombudsperson, the government committed to the full formalization of the position
(with a fully independent mandate and adequate resources from the State budget)
from July 2014.

10. Committed state authorities to the legal capacity reform. A draft law on supported
decision-making and regulation of a national agency on coordination and monitoring
support agreements was elaborated and is pending government approval.
11. An implementation and coordination mechanism within the executive branch of
government was created and the executive branch was capacitated.
12. Civil society’s understanding of the rights of persons with disabilities significantly
increased.
Lessons learned
1. A key aspect to creating an enabling environment and national ownership was the
inclusion of disabled persons’ organizations in all programmatic stages of the
intervention, including in the design, implementation and monitoring and in the
evaluation of results.
2. Another indispensable condition is the creation of national ownership and
43
development of the political will towards reform in order to apply international
standards such as those of the CRPD.
3. Working together with national counterparts to build awareness and technical
capacity for carrying out implementation is is essential for success.
4. Coordination and common planning amongst the broader UNCT under the committed
leadership of the RC and the formulation of interventions on the basis of the
comparative advantages of the individual agencies that are promoting the rights of
persons with disabilities, are essential for mission success.
5. The push from civil society and the work of the UN Special Rapporteur for Disability
and Human Rights were essential to fostering government willingness to address this
issue.
Bolivia: UNIPP (United Nations Indigenous People’s Partnership)
44

Abstract

The main purpose of the programme in Bolivia was to strengthen the capacity of the
government and indigenous peoples’ organizations to implement the right to free, prior and
informed consultation (FPIC) in all areas of development that affect their interests, in
accordance with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provisions
in the ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169).

The programme aimed at contributing to the construction and implementation of a

regulatory framework for the exercise of the right to national consultation, training civil
servants and indigenous organizations, at developing a methodology for participatory
assessment for Highly Vulnerable Indigenous Peoples and at strengthening their capacity to
formulate their own priorities in development processes and to participate in the formulation,
implementation and evaluation of national and regional development plans.

Background

The Constitution of Bolivia states in Article 30 II (15) that "nations and native
indigenous peoples are entitled to the following rights: [...] To be consulted through
appropriate procedures and in particular through its institutions, whenever legislative or
administrative measures likely to affect them. In this context, it shall respect and ensure the
right to prior consultation undertaken by the State, in good faith and agreed with respect to
the exploitation of non-renewable natural resources in the territory they inhabit." This article
of the constitution reflects the provisions contained in Article 6 of the ILO Indigenous and
Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169) and in Article 19 of the UN Declaration on the Rights
of Indigenous Peoples. However, despite this recognition, implementation of the right to
consultation is only referred to in the Hydrocarbons Law.

The OHCHR in Bolivia has registered several complaints by indigenous organizations

concerning government failure to implement projects or to adopt rules in accordance with
international human rights or national law.

The Vice Ministry of Decolonization made a diagnosis of the situation of racism and
discrimination in Bolivia under the joint programme Fostering Peaceful Change, which has the
support of various agencies of the United Nations System in Bolivia. It stated that:
1. Public entities do not consult them to define public policy and, when they do, their opinions
45
are not heard or considered.

2. In the development and implementation of projects, they are considered only formally or
they learn when entering the execution, therefore lacking of cultural relevance, causing (for
example) the destruction of sacred sites and natural chains of water supply, which endangers
sustainability.

3. The right to prior consultation of indigenous peoples is enshrined in the Constitution as a

result of the elevation to the status of international law instruments; however, the right
mechanisms and instruments have not been developed. This acrimonious contention over
various interpretations has led to social conflict.

In this context, the UN in Bolivia has brought together five UN agencies – UNDP, ILO,
OHCHR, UNFPA and UNICEF – to support the rights of indigenous peoples in line with ILO
Convention No. 169 and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Implementation strategy

The programme has three strategic pillars:

1. Strengthening regulatory capacities of the right to prior consultation at the national
level under the support of processes of formulation, consultation and coordination of
specific laws and regulations. These should include legislators, indigenous
organizations, women and other relevant stakeholders such as teenagers, youth and
elderly people.
2. Strengthening of the capacities for implementing the right to prior consultation
through systematic training processes first targeting state officials, indigenous leaders
and other sectors dealing with indigenous peoples. In all processes, the equitable
representation of women as well as the participation and inclusion of the needs and
rights of children and adolescents will be promoted. Furthermore, specific activities
with indigenous women will be undertaken in order to acknowledge and address their
demands.
3. Strengthening the capabilities of highly vulnerable indigenous peoples to represent
their interests by supporting the development of diagnostic and comprehensive
development plans as a platform for the people involved in their relations with state
and private development institutions.
 The programme partnered with two organizations – the Central Indigenous Peoples
46
of the Amazonian Pando (CIPOAP) and the Central Indigenous Women from Amazonian
Pando (CIMAP) – to assist the elaboration of participatory diagnostics and development
plans of five indigenous peoples that live in the Pando Region. Of these, three (the Yaminahua,
Machineri and Esse Ejja) are defined as “’highly vulnerable’” because of their decreasing
population.
Progress and results
1. Support for two meetings of the National Commission on the Right to Consultation
that took place in August and December 2013. The meetings gathered representatives
of the government and indigenous peoples’ organizations (IPOs) from all regions of the
country. The new law proposal, in line with international standards, was agreed upon
by the representatives of government and all major IPOs in the country and will be
submitted to the next Legislative Assembly.
2. The programme facilitated the Third International Conferences on the Right to
Consultation in coordination with the Ministry of Interior in Bolivia, with the aim of
discussing fundamental issues concerning the right to consultation, and supported
the realization of more than 60 sectorial and regional events that were organized at
the request of the government and indigenous peoples’ organizations in 17 cities.
The main purpose of these events was to review the first draft of the proposed law
concerning the right to consultation. UN experts participated in several of these
events, providing training and advisory services supporting international legislation
and law proposals.
3. The programme organized the first multinational meeting of indigenous and public
universities for the right to consultation and the elimination of racism and all forms
of discrimination in partnership with the Vice Ministry of Decolonization. The aim of
the meeting was to promote a more active role of the academic community in
supporting the rights of indigenous peoples. Representatives attended the meeting
from public and indigenous universities, the Ministry of Education and the
Ombudsman’s Office. Three out 11 universities expressed their formal commitment to
contribute to the consultation process with indigenous peoples.

Outcomes
1. The project promoted the more active participation of indigenous women in the
process of consultation, allowing for the inclusion of a more explicit gender
perspective in the law project with the incorporation of UN Women.
 2. Meetings were organized by the programme in which the indigenous peoples’
47
organizations presented their plans to local and national governments and to
cooperation agencies. The national and departmental governments have reportedly
expressed their willingness to include indigenous demands in their future planning and
budgets.
3. The project shared the inputs from the process with the Vice Ministry of Indigenous
Justice, which promoted participation of concerned parties in crafting the Law on the
Protection of the Indigenous Peoples and Nations in Danger of Extinction in a State of
Voluntary Isolation and Non-Contact. The Legislative Assembly approved this law in
December 2013.
Lessons learned
1. By emphasizing a rights-based approach, it is possible to link the issue of indigenous
peoples’ access to justice and other issues with the different UN agencies’
programmatic actions toward indigenous peoples and thereby to strengthen the
collaborative work carried out within the UN. This further facilitates resource
mobilization within the agencies.
2. Generally, the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples is part of a process that
takes time; coordination of interventions at the national level remains a great
challenge. Substantial commitment and flexibility to negotiate outcomes are
required.
3. The rights-based approach is particularly relevant in those countries with highly
vulnerable indigenous peoples and is based on international norms and standards
that require the adaptation of national legislation and practices to international
standards.
4. A systematization effort designed for the Bolivian indigenous peoples was reportedly
undertaken at the national level, as the government is keen to show its efforts and
the results. While it is not targeted for a UN or international audience, it may be highly
relevant for most other countries in Latin America that have indigenous peoples and it
could be useful for the region if funding for such a Spanish-language publication can be
found.
Nepal: A human rights-based approach to transitional justice in Nepal
48

Abstract
The UN agencies in Nepal adopted a combined approach to work with duty bearers
and rights holders to ensure transitional justice (TJ) compliant with international standards,
yet implementable in the context of Nepal. In addition, TJ initiatives linked with efforts to
strengthen the longer-term rule of law, human rights and justice mechanisms. Despite visible
successes in the mobilization of a local civil society constituency with capacity to advocate for
TJ processes meeting international standards, challenges remain in ensuring that TJ more
broadly is implemented as part of sustainable peacebuilding.
Background
Nepal emerged from a decade long conflict in 2006 with the signing of the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). In this agreement, political parties committed to
transitional justice (TJ) processes determining the establishment of two truth-seeking
mechanisms: a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and a Commission on Inquiry on
Disappearances (CID).
The UN, as a third-party impartial caretaker and custodian of international standards,
has attempted to ensure that these mechanisms and the overall TJ process, including
reparations, are established and managed in line with international standards. Efforts of the
UN have been ongoing since 2007 and recognize the role that TJ plays in dealing with the past
and in building sustainable peace through addressing root causes of conflict. OHCHR, IOM and
UNDP, with support from their headquarters and their global missions, have been providing
niche technical assistance to this end. In addition, these agencies and others, including
UNODC, have contributed to overall justice sector reform efforts – for example, regarding
victims and protection legislation.
Major challenges are that there remains no common understanding of TJ in Nepal and
that the lack of a comprehensive national strategy for TJ makes it difficult to have a unified
approach. Understanding of TJ in Nepal is limited to the two commissions established by the
CPA. Furthermore, the TJ process is very much an indigenous and self-guided process driven by
the government, but with insufficient technical capacity and understanding of what constitutes
a comprehensive TJ process. Fear of prosecution is high and leads to narrow focusing on
amnesty and accountability.
Implementation strategy
49

Initially, OHCHR initiated a TJ project with four main outputs, namely: 1) advisory and
technical support to the Ministry of Peace and Reconstruction (MoPR); 2) support for efforts
assisting the establishment of TJ commissions; 3) collating allegations of serious violations of
international human rights and humanitarian laws; and 4) support to civil society organizations
to facilitate interaction between victims of the conflict and the TJ commissions. With the delay
of the establishment of the TJ commissions, the main focus of OHCHR’s work was on building
understanding of TJ, providing technical knowledge to the government and other stakeholders
and supporting the creation or strengthening of constituencies of conflict victims as advocates
for necessary standards in the TJ process.
Later, OHCHR and IOM jointly worked on drafting a reparations policy in compliance
with international norms and standards and feasible in the Nepal context. Moreover, efforts
focused on establishing effective and transparent mechanisms to provide reparations to the
victims of human rights violations of the armed conflict. With the delay in forming the TJ
commissions, the outputs of this project were not implemented as such, but nevertheless
contributed an important analysis of options and recommendations for the government that
could to be referred to and accessed when timely. The support of the global Peacebuilding
Fund for these activities was crucial.
At the same time, OHCHR and UNODC were working with duty bearers on developing
effective victim and witness protection mechanisms and comprehensive legislation relevant
for TJ and criminal justice cases. The aim was to connect efforts regarding the TJ mechanisms
with institutional reforms in the criminal justice system.
While the government tries to address all TJ issues within the two TJ commissions, the
law neither matches the promises of the government nor addresses the rights and
expectations of conflict victims. In January 2015, while the case on the TRC Act was still in the
Supreme Court, the government went ahead with establishing these TJ commissions, which
are not compliant with international standards. As a result, the UN country team, led by the
UN Resident Coordinator, shifted its approach from supporting the TJ process and establishing
the two TJ commissions to working exclusively with conflict victims.
The implementation was not structured around a single common programme for all
four UN agencies, but various interventions were undertaken at different stages and by
different agencies to address some of the aspects of TJ, as mentioned above. Despite the
complexities and delays in establishing the two TJ commissions, the UN scored some important
results.
Progress and results
50
1. The efforts to build local civil society’s understanding about TJ has led to a strong
national constituency that is able to negotiate and advocate for key TJ provisions in
line with international standards.
2. In a situation where the legislation presented by the government on the establishment
of the TJ commissions continues to be potentially contrary to the decision of Nepal’s
Supreme Court and international law in allowing for amnesty in cases of gross human
rights violations, the UN Resident Coordinator has convened a TJ Task Force to
promote a common UN position and understanding on TJ in accordance with the UN
Secretary-General’s Guidance Note on TJ (2010). The TJ Task Force has developed
common messaging, clarified roles and responsibilities and ensured coordination
between various UN agencies with respect to policy and legal issues and in
addressing the needs and demands of the victims.
Outcomes

1. Engagement with conflict victims has strengthened the capacity of the conflict victims
to seek judicial intervention and to seek TJ legislations compatible with the January
2014 decision of the Supreme Court of Nepal.

The Supreme Court of Nepal decision of 2 January 2014, made on the case filed against
the Truth and Reconciliation Ordinance 2013, included the following five points:

1. Review, reform and amend the ordinance not to include provision of amnesty
for serious human rights violations without the victims’ consent, which compromises
with the victims’ fundamental right to justice, right to life and liberty, right to
information and right against torture
2. Make criminal prosecution of persons accused of serious violation of human
rights certain, easy and uninterrupted
3. Review and amend the limitation of 35 days to file a case after receiving
recommendation from the Commission or a ministry on serious violation of human
rights
4. Reform laws and adopt practical measures to criminalize acts of serious human
rights violations, to manage truth-finding and reconciliation, to initiate campaigns for
reconciliation, to provide reparations to victims and their families, to ensure autonomy
 and impartiality of the TRC, to ensure victim and witness protection, to arrange in-
51
camera or distance hearing, etc.
5. Take assistance from conflict experts, organizations representing victims’
interest, human rights experts and other stakeholders on amnesty and other issues13

In February 2015, the Supreme Court of Nepal upheld its previous decisions on the
case filed against the Truth and Reconciliation Act, 2014, and noted the following
points:

1) The TRC cannot recommend amnesty to perpetrators of serious human rights

violations before charging them and determining their crime. There cannot be
amnesty in cases of serious human rights violations if the victims do not
consent.
2) Reconciliation should not be used as a means of amnesty in serious cases of
human rights violations. And victim's consent is must.
3) The commissions should follow the constitution, international law, human
rights instruments, principles of justice and past Supreme Court verdicts to
guide its work.
4) The judiciary shall decide whether the conflict-era cases that are under the
consideration of the regular court system should be handed over to the TRC
and CID. No cases under the jurisdiction of court may be handed over to any
other institution for final decisions.

2. Since 2009, the process of forming the TJ commissions was delayed and became
gradually politicized. In January 2014, the Supreme Court of Nepal issued a
decision in order to make new legislation for TJ and the two commissions so they
would be compliant with international standards. In February 2015, the Supreme
Court of Nepal upheld its previous decisions and ruled out that the commissions
should work in compliance with international and national laws. UNDP and the UN
Regional County Office have methodically facilitated the victims’ groups to
develop a common platform that an overwhelming number of groups can support
in order to pursue advocacy, capacity development and programming for a victim-
centric TJ process. UNDP and the UN Regional County Office have engaged and

13
069-WS-0057 – Rephrased and summarized decision of the Supreme Court of Nepal, 2 January 2014
 provided technical support to the victims’ platform to engage with the TRC and the
52
CID and ensure that both TJ commissions’ work is victim-centric.
Lessons learned
1. Because the CPA required the establishment of TJ commissions, the development of a
strategy to holistically deal with the TJ process was skipped, leading to an incomplete
and fragmented approach towards TJ that should be avoided.
2. Limiting the TJ discourse and focusing heavily on amnesty and prosecution delayed the
work on other elements of the TJ process. In particular, victims themselves were not
consulted on their needs, something important in a context where victims’ needs vary
significantly particularly with respect to their socio-economic circumstances.
3. Building the understanding and networking of conflict victims has the challenge of
adopting methods that foster common ground rather than lead to competition and
polarization of victim groups.
4. Where the UN works heavily on building the understanding of rights holders on any
issue, governments may criticize it for raising expectations and generating seemingly
unmanageable demands.
5. The UN needs to constantly advocate for a TJ process that addresses the root causes
of the conflict. Where the TJ process is divorced from the drivers of conflict,
cleavages in society remain and injure the overall development of the country.
6. The UN needs to advocate for an inclusive TJ process. In Nepal, survivors of conflict-
related sexual violence and of torture risk being left out of the broader TJ processes
due to lack of data and political will.
7. It is critical to create a common understanding of TJ in the country, within
government and among development partners, some of which agree to support the
work of the TJ commissions, while others do not. The establishment of the TJ TFC is an
important step in the right direction. In this complex context, the work of the UN
centred on technical support and assistance to victims groups and civil society
organizations can empower national actors and develop capacity to claim, exercise
their rights and ensure that they are consulted at all stages of the TJ process.
8. Raising awareness and understanding of local stakeholders, duty bearers and rights
holders on TJ and related international standards is crucial, particularly to dismantle
myths around the TJ process and to ensure that TJ processes address root causes of
conflict and meet the needs of the victims. In addition, linking rule-of-law initiatives
and criminal justice systems’ strengthening with TJ efforts, and efforts to build both, is
 valuable, recognizing that the onus is on the criminal justice system to provide a legal
53
remedy for victims of conflict.
9. In supporting civil society organizations, care should be taken to assess the extent to
which they represent the interests of victims and to continuously expand
participation of diverse conflict victims in a manner that is conflict-sensitive and that
does no harm, fostering recognition of conflict victims’ groups as legitimate
stakeholders in the TJ process. In particular, consultations with victims of sexual
violence and children should adopt appropriate measures to ensure that no harm is
done.
10. Working with victims’ groups is a positive response and method for the UN to
remain engaged in TJ despite in-country legal provisions that may be contrary to
international law. Support to TJ overall can still be provided through strengthening
victims’ groups, without engaging with the flawed institutions.
11. The Nepal case study highlights the need for TJ processes to be relevant and adapted
to the specific context of the government and society.
China – Fiji – Guatemala: Reducing HIV-related stigma and discrimination and
54
increasing access to justice

This joint case study stems from UN agency initiatives, particularly from UNAIDS,
working to create enabling social and legal environments for successful HIV responses. In two
of the three cases (China and Fiji), results have been grounded on strong advocacy from the
UN and have removed punitive HIV-related laws and policies. In the case of Guatemala, the
initiative was established to increase access to justice for people living with and vulnerable to
HIV; this project was developed over two years.

Abstract and background

In Fiji in 2010, the UNAIDS Pacific Office, in collaboration with other partners in the
UN, civil society and government, were involved in the development of Fiji HIV Decree, which
was finally promulgated in 2011. When the President of Fiji promulgated the Decree on behalf
of the government, it was noticed that it contained elements that exacerbated HIV-related
stigma and discrimination by creating restrictions on entry and stay based on HIV status alone.
“HIV/AIDS is not a quarantinable disease for the purposes of the Quarantine Act (Cap. 112),
but the right of the State to refuse entry to Fiji of a person suffering from HIV/AIDS who is not
a Fiji citizen or a Fiji resident is preserved together with the discretion to the Minister
responsible for Health to permit a short term stay on reasonable grounds.” UNAIDS provided
technical advice and successfully recommended to drop this statement from the HIV Decree.

In Guangdong Province in China in January 2013, UNAIDS became aware of draft

legislation issued by the Department of Education of Guangdong Province that stipulated that
people living with HIV would not be eligible to serve as teachers in Guangdong. The UN
responded quickly with other UN agencies to address the problem and the legislation was
amended to remove the restrictions.

Guatemala’s legal framework and constitution protect individuals from discrimination.

However, enforcement of the laws is weak, particularly for people living with HIV (PLHIV) and
certain populations within Guatemala such as commercial sex workers, men who have sex with
men, and transgender people. These groups are particularly vulnerable to violations of their
human rights, which continue at unacceptable levels. Given the high number of human rights
violations experienced by PLHIV and key populations, civil society partners and government
face challenges in responding to their needs. In response, UNAIDS provided technical and
financial support to establish a group of 50 lawyers – Professional Leaders – that is led by an
attorney experienced in giving legal support to civil society organizations; the programme
55
provided pro bono legal services from November 2012 until October 2014. As a result of the
increase in legal aid, 584 cases were recorded between December 2011 and December 2012,
representing a 23 percent increase over 2011.

Implementation strategy

In China, as part of ongoing efforts of UNAIDS to address HIV-related discrimination,

UNAIDS regularly monitors new laws and policies relating to HIV and provides input where
appropriate. In January 2013, UNAIDS became aware of draft legislation issued by the
Department of Education of Guangdong Province that stipulated that people living with HIV
would not be eligible to serve as teachers in Guangdong. UNAIDS, together with UNESCO and
ILO, quickly responded to this draft, sending a formal letter to the Guangdong Bureau of
Education and issuing a public statement regarding the proposed legislation, emphasizing
the potential negative consequences of this legislation from a public health perspective and
the effect that it would have in propagating discrimination.
In Fiji, community and national consultations on the HIV Decree were held in the
Northern, Central and Western Divisions of the country in 2010. UNAIDS Fiji hired a consultant
to incorporate feedback from the partners, including UN agencies, regarding the HIV Decree. A
series of advocacy meetings were arranged by the Fiji Ministry of Health, with support from
UNAIDS and other partners. Seeing that the Decree posed serious human rights problems,
UNAIDS, in consultation with other partners, advised the government to amend the Decree.
UNAIDS provided technical assistance to the government on how to ensure that all aspects
of the HIV Decree would uphold the rights of people living with and vulnerable to HIV, with
specific reference to how to eliminate HIV- related restrictions on entry, stay and residence.
As a result of this process, the President of Fiji, at the 2011 International Congress on AIDS in
Asia and the Pacific (ICAAP) held in Busan, Republic of Korea, formally announced that Fiji
was lifting HIV-related restrictions on entry, stay and residence.
In Guatemala in 2012, UNAIDS, in collaboration with the organization Professional
Leaders/Action Foundation, established the Equal Access to Justice initiative. The initiative
began when UNAIDS identified a lawyer who had helped civil society organizations acquire
legal status. This attorney mobilized 50 lawyers who were willing to be trained in human rights
and HIV and to provide pro bono legal services. Human rights trainings included sensitization
to the realities of life for PLHIVs and members of certain populations; the sessions benefited
from the participation of various civil society organizations and the National Human Rights
Ombudsman. Thus, Professional Leaders, which offers comprehensive services, including social
56
work and psychological support, was born.

After training was implemented, UNAIDS facilitated the launch, with media presence,
of the Equal Access to Justice initiative, which representing an agreement to collaborate
among civil society, the Professional Leaders, the National Ombudsman for Human Rights and
the Dean of Law School from the National University of San Carlos. Furthermore, a letter of
agreement with the Legal Network and its Observatory on Human Rights of Key Populations
and HIV14* was signed; this provided a link to technical and financial support from UNDP, via
an existing framework for referral and cooperation employed by both organizations. The Equal
Access to Justice initiative builds on advances made by various partners in the national
response, including civil society organizations, UN agencies (namely OHCHR, PAHO/WHO,
UNFPA, UNDP) and other international organizations.

Progress and results

China
1. Following advocacy from UNAIDS, UNESCO and ILO, the Guangdong Province Bureau
of Education issued a final draft of the legislation, with the HIV-related restrictions
removed. The Guangdong Bureau of Education also issued a letter to UNAIDS, UNESCO
and ILO indicating that the joint advocacy initiative was a key factor in the decision to
remove the restrictions.
2. This legislative shift marked an important step forward for efforts to eliminate
discrimination against people living with HIV, broadening the range of career
opportunities available to people living with HIV in Guangdong, China’s most populous
province. In May 2013, UNAIDS issued a statement commending the legislative
changes, which constitute an important example of progressive policymaking.

Fiji
1. The HIV-related restrictions on entry, stay and residence were removed and
mandatory testing for HIV for travellers to Fiji was abolished.
2. Fiji is now seen as an exemplary point of reference in the removal of HIV-related
travel restrictions in the Pacific and advice is often sought on how Fiji was able to do
this. The speech of the President of Fiji at the Busan ICAAP was seen as an entry point

14
The Legal Network and its Observatory on Human Rights of Key Populations and HIV is a network
composed of more than 25 civil society organizations across the country. The referral of cases from civil
society and the National Ombudsman to Professional Leaders began in early 2014.
 to ensure that Fijian laws uphold the human rights of people living with HIV. Indeed,
57
since the Amendment Decree of 2011, Fiji has been the flag bearer for removal of HIV-
related restrictions on entry, stay and residence in the Pacific.

Guatemala

Six training workshops were implemented during 2013 to strengthen the abilities of
Professional Leaders, facilitated by the National Human Rights Ombudsman’s Office, the
National Diversity Network, UNAIDS, the National Legal Network and its Observatory on
Human Rights of Key Populations and PLHIV, and OHCHR. An informal agreement was reached
with the National Ombudsman’s Office to encourage case referrals. A formal letter of
agreement between Professional Leaders and the National Legal Network and its Observatory
on Human Rights of Key Populations and PLHIV, outlining case referral procedures, was signed.
1. To date, the National Ombudsman and CS organizations have referred 13 cases to
Professional Leaders, five of which have been resolved with financial restitution to
clients and eight of which are in the process of resolution. As of October 2014, UNDP
has come on board and is providing financing and technical assistance to the initiative.

Addressing HIV-related discrimination in the workplace

An integrated care unit in a private company informed the company’s human resources
department of an employee’s HIV status. The director of the department divulged this
information to other employees and, ultimately, management requested the resignation of the
employee. Legal assistance offered by the Equal Access to Justice initiative resulted in a
settlement for 32,000 Quetzals; a requirement that the employer provide employees
training about and sensitization to HIV; reinstate the employee; and provide references if
the employee should seek employment elsewhere.

2. The Equal Access to Justice initiative inspired and contributes to the measurement of
one of the indicators in the United Nations Development Assistance Framework 2015-
2019, providing a stimulus for the UN System and government partners to commit to
increasing the reporting of human rights violations as well as the processing and
resolution of cases.
Lessons learned
58
China
1. Joint efforts among UN agencies for supporting human rights issues should be
further promoted.
2. Targeted advocacy from UN agencies can influence legislation and align it with
international standards.
3. UNAIDS and ILO are working closely with the Ministry of Labour to remove
restrictions preventing PLHIV from being public servants in China.

Fiji
1. The President of Fiji played a key role in removing HIV-related travel and residency
restrictions. Having an influential and respected government leader who believes in
protecting the rights of people living with HIV is an asset when developing and passing
government policies.
2. Technical support provided by the UN and its partners is critically important in
influencing policy change at country level. The material provided by UNAIDS
headquarters assisted in advocating for the lifting of HIV-related restrictions on entry,
stay and residence.
3. As a Pacific country that has removed HIV-related travel restrictions, Fiji is a good
practice example to other countries in the region – Tonga, Samoa, the Solomon
Islands and the Republic of the Marshall Islands – that still have such restrictions.
Guatemala
1. A key to the success of this initiative has been the linking of different actors around a
common goal. Identifying members of the private sector – in this case, individual
attorneys with a willingness to work with PLHIV and key populations – has proven
invaluable to increasing the reporting of human rights violations and the provision of
quality legal services. As expressed by Julio Rodriguez, the leader of the initiative, “The
Equal Access to Justice initiative demonstrates our commitment. For us, it is very
important as it represents our social responsibility; we can help those who we know
are the most marginalized in our society.”
2. Building on previous efforts of key actors has allowed for a greater synergy between
implementers and projects geared to the defence of human rights. The national Legal
Network and its Observatory on Human Rights of Key Populations and PLHIV, UN
agencies (UNFPA, PNUD, OHCHR, PAHO/OMS), government partners and civil society
organizations had previously laid the foundation for the exercise of human rights. The
 Equal Access to Justice initiative builds upon this work and again brings together these
59
actors defend the human rights of those who might not otherwise have the resources
to do so themselves.
3. The Equal Access to Justice initiative can serve as a model for UN agencies that work in
human rights. Where there is great impunity and particular populations face
discrimination and thus restriction of their access to basic rights such as education,
health and employment, projects that bring together the expertise and passion of
individuals and organizations committed to the defence of human rights have the
capacity to fill existing gaps in government and civil society responses.
Zambia: UN Joint Programme on Gender-Based Violence
60
The UN Joint Programme on Gender-Based Violence (GBV), with its well-structured
approach and programme architecture, is an interesting example of having high potential for
strong results. However, as it started only in 2013 and remains a work in progress, it is not
presented as a full case study since validation of results cannot yet be undertaken. It
nevertheless can inform similar GBV joint programmes.
Abstract and background
Zambia is a signatory to the international instruments on gender equality, including the
CEDAW. In 2010, the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and
consequences, visited Zambia and commended the country’s efforts to establish a law that
would deal with GBV. However, her recommendations indicated that the enactment of the
Anti-Gender-Based Violence Bill should be accompanied by dedicated budget allocations for its
effective implementation and by action plans to build the capacity of all relevant actors. The
country enacted the Anti-Gender Based Violence Act in 2011. In July 2011, a combined 5th and
6th Periodic Zambia Country Report on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against Women (CEDAW, 1979) was presented to the United Nations
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (49th Session, 11-29 July
2011). The Committee’s Concluding Observations on Violence against Women, echoing the
previous year’s recommendations of the Special Rapporteur, noted that Zambia should
prioritize and ensure adequate resources for the full implementation of the Anti-Gender-Based
Violence Act (2011) and adopt comprehensive measures to address such violence. In this
context, the UN in Zambia developed a joint programme involving the ILO, IOM, UNICEF,
UNFPA, UNDP and WHO to support the government in implementing the recommendations
on violence against women contained in the CEDAW’s concluding observations and to
support institutional transformation to facilitate the implementation of the Anti-Gender-
Based Violence Act.
There are challenges and gaps in the provision of legal, protection, health and
psychosocial services to survivors of GBV. Access to justice and protection is impeded by
generalized impunity, limited numbers of shelters and insufficient legal representation. GBV
survivors have little awareness of their rights and are constrained by economic dependency.
Insufficient coordination among and inadequate capacities of service providers compound this.
Strategy and entry point
The UN launched the Joint Programme in mid-2013. The Programme has five
components:
 1. Legal and policy review. Reform, strengthening and implementation of relevant laws
61
and policies to include measures at the broadest level to ensure that women/girl’s
rights are recognized and protected.
2. Capacity development and service provision. Capacity development is targeted at
skills-building and learning, using a combination of trainings such as training of trainers
and cross-sectoral training to provide a comprehensive and effective response to GBV.
This strategy provides GBV survivors with immediate care, protection, relief and
rehabilitation through a comprehensive package including expansion, renovation and
improvement of the existing structures.
3. Advocacy and communication. These allow a cross-section of stakeholders to become
aware of their legal and human rights and the impact of GBV. These include
community mobilization programmes that are expected to change violence-related
attitudes and behaviours and to promote more equitable relationships between men
and women. This strategy also engages young men through men’s networks and other
forums to change harmful cultural attitudes.
4. Research and data generation. This strategy will streamline data collection and
analysis for focus on 10 or fewer GBV categories to ensure that incidence data is
recorded comprehensively and consistently. This strategy will also strengthen and
support existing mechanisms for gathering, processing and sharing GBV statistics.
5. Coordination, partnership and networking. This component seeks to strengthen and
harmonize relations and information sharing among the main implementing
stakeholders. It will further strengthen referrals and collaboration between GBV
service providers to reduce duplication of efforts and to minimize gaps and challenges.
Progress and results
1. In order to achieve the full implementation of the Anti-Gender-Based Violence Law,
the UN Joint Programme on Gender-Based Violence supported the development of
rules of court. Furthermore, the Programme has contributed greatly to the visibility
and recognition of gender-based violence as a social, public and human rights issue
among government ministries, NGOs and various public and private players in Zambia.
As a result, the number of reported cases increased from 9,738 in 2012 to 10,217 in
the last quarter of 2013 (source: Zambia Police Report on GBV Statistics).
2. At the national level, the key result is the development of the Health Sector Strategy
on Gender-Based Violence. The establishment of Gender-Based Violence District Task
Forces and health worker teams involved in gender-based violence management have
disseminated better information about migration and gender-based violence and
 coordinated the response to gender-based violence. Acknowledging that the
62
achievement of reproductive rights is determined largely by gender equality and
equity in the delivery of affordable and accessible services, the Joint Programme on
gender-based violence in Luapula and the north-western provinces of Zambia have
been working with the Provincial Medical Office and local civil society to implement a
model that addresses gender-based violence as part of an essential sexual
reproductive health package. The model is in line with the government’s National
Guidelines for the Multi-Disciplinary Management of Gender-Based Violence.
3. To increase the network of support, 480 community-based care providers have been
trained in community-based psychosocial care and support services for gender-based
violence survivors, while 60 community help desks were formed in three districts.
4. An important outcome of the anti-gender-based violence advocacy campaign, which
was supported by the Programme, was the judicial decision to explore the
establishment of a Fast-Track Gender-Based Violence Court within the criminal justice
system. To this end, consultative works and institutional requirements have been
gathered and are being translated into appropriate legislation.
Lessons learned
1. The CEDAW was the essential trigger for the Joint Programme, but the report from the
2010 visit of the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women was key in the
development of the Programme’s strategy.
2. The Programme must shift its focus to community-related interventions, where the
social, cultural and traditional issues that surround gender-based violence can be
addressed.
3. Women who have been in long-term relationships may themselves become
perpetrators of violence and, in some instances, kill their partners. Such cases have
fallen off the radar because they are not treated as GBV cases. There is a need to
document these and to develop strategies to support such women, who, while in
prison, are likely to be accompanied by their children.
4. Future research on women who commit violent acts in response to having been
abuses will provide information for developing strategies to support such women.
Findings, common approaches and lessons learned 63

General findings from the case studies

4. International norms and standards are the bedrock of the UN’s work at country level.
They represent the UNCT’s commitment and driving force for an integrated, people-
centred approach to ‘leave no one behind’. Human rights and gender equality are at
the heart of all of the case studies presented, regardless of the target group
concerned: men, women, children or all human beings. Whether it is the rights of
women (Zambia, Albania), of indigenous people (Bolivia), of persons with disabilities
(Moldova), of PLHIV (China/Fiji/Guatemala), of children (Yemen), or of all human
beings regardless of gender, sex or age (Mozambique and Nepal), the commitment
and concern for the defence of human rights are the foundation and cornerstone of
the case studies. Each case study draws on different international legal instruments to
support its approach: Zambia and Albania used the CEDAW as the entry point; Bolivia
used the ILO conventions and UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People;
Moldova used the CRPD and recommendations of special procedures; Yemen used the
CRC; Mozambique used the ILO recommendation on special protection floors; and
Nepal, Fiji, China and Guatemala used relevant international standards to protect
vulnerable groups from discrimination and exclusion.
5. Member States widely recognize the UN as an impartial and trusted partner. It has a
role as international standard-setting body and as development partner for each
Member State. The recognized political neutrality of the UN makes it often a more
acceptable partner for government than other development actors. This strong
comparative advantage of the UN System is sometimes insufficiently exploited in
certain countries. The adoption of international standards is an aspiration for all
member countries, yet it is sometimes difficult for them to accomplish it alone. The
political neutrality of the UN and its commitment to applying these international
standards are the reflection of its core values. Nevertheless, the UNCTs need to
continue to be vocal and to advocate for these standards and values, as called for in
the new UNDG guidance for RC on human rights.
6. The UN’s international norms and standards are relevant and applicable in every
country context, whether in development or post-conflict and transition. By
integrating international normative standards into common programming, the UN
 System can effectively support Member States in addressing the development needs
64
of the poorest and most vulnerable segments of society, regardless of the country
context, level of human development and geographical and cultural specificities. Using
the human rights-based approach (HRBA) as an entry point for identifying
programming priorities is demonstrably universally valid and applicable to any context.
In some of the countries presented, such as Nepal, the UN country teams faced
particularly complex and challenging situations in which it was critical to use and
uphold international standards. These examples demonstrate that, even in volatile and
potentially changing country contexts, the UN’s international norms and standards set
out the core principles that will guide the UN in defining its strategic priorities and
actions.

Common approaches followed by UNCTs

The case studies show that strong national commitment, leadership and ownership are
key to advancing the human rights agenda and improving the lives of the most vulnerable.
Many countries aspire to live up to their commitments to international standards, but do not
always have the necessary capacity or expertise to implement them. The UN, through the
country teams, has accumulated experience in supporting national efforts and promoting
wider and more inclusive processes by adopting five complementary strategies and
approaches: 1) fostering legislative change; 2) leveraging UN human rights mechanisms; 3)
targeted joint advocacy; 4) capacity development of duty bearers and rights holders; and 5)
promoting inclusive national reform process, including participation of wider stakeholders.
1. Legislative change and alignment of national laws and policies with international
norms and standards. The case studies show that a crucial entry point for the UN to
integrate the normative and operational frameworks consists in conducting gap
analyses of national legal frameworks against international standards. A robust
national legal and policy framework is necessary to uphold human rights values and
the UN has a clear comparative advantage in supporting governments to this end. In
all of the countries featured in the case studies, the UN country teams have directly
influenced or contributed to the development of national legislation or the
implementation of international instruments to which the country has subscribed.
Case studies also indicate that, when working at the policy and legislative levels, it is
important to foster national and participatory dialogue between duty bearers and
rights holders.
 In addition, the review of the national legislation can be used as an opportunity for the
65
UNCT to identify opportunities for integrated support to cross-cutting issues such as
gender equality or inclusive development processes. In most cases, these assessments
or gap analyses have been crucial for identifying capacity needs of rights holders and
duty bearers for the implementation of international standards and thus to bringing
together the UN System-wide response to complex issues.
One aspect that is not captured in the case studies and might require a longer period
to be appraised is the degree of enforcement of legislation. Legislative change is a
precondition for respect for universal values, but it is not necessarily sufficient to
ensure that human rights are being adequately safeguarded (e.g., Guatemala, Yemen,
etc.). The UN should therefore also seek to ensure that adequate monitoring and
support are given to the implementation of national legislation, as laws that are not
properly being enforced serve limited purpose and impunity is a key challenge in a
number of situations. This requires a sustained advocacy campaign from the UN and a
constant reminder of the country’s obligations and commitments towards
international standards; it also requires the long-term capacity development of critical
national counterparts.
2. Several cases mention the importance of the work of UN human rights mechanisms –
treaty bodies, special procedures, Universal Periodic Review and supervisory bodies of
instruments under special agencies such as ILO Convention – that provided entry
points for UN interventions (Moldova, Zambia) and created momentum to work
together with governments and civil society on programmatic actions aimed at
implementing international obligations or recommendations. National authorities see
the UN System as a trusted partner and thus as capable of presenting ‘criticism as a
friend’, i.e., by helping countries improve their human rights situations as a means
toward greater international legitimacy and by the UN’s ability to deliver development
services.
3. Targeted joint advocacy is necessary to create awareness and champions for UN values
and international commitments. This involves communicating, raising awareness and
engaging with different stakeholders in the process of change. It can be effective in
itself as a tool to bring about legislative change, as the case studies of Fiji and China
(Guangdong) have demonstrated. As the Fiji case also shows, it is similarly necessary in
order to find the champions within government and civil society who will be
committed to the application of these values and will likewise advocate and act in their
 constituencies to influence the necessary changes that will lead to application and
66
respect for international human rights norms and standards.
4. Capacity development is meant to provide the tools and expertise to operationalize
change. Sometimes, there is the willingness and commitment, but the technical skills
and capacities to actually implement legislation are lacking. All case studies
incorporate a capacity development component, as technical knowledge was essential
to supporting processes for change. The challenge remains for the UN to define clearly
what kind of capacity is being built, for what change and to what level, as capacity
development is not an end in itself, but part of the process to achieve the anticipated
results of the intervention strategy. The cases studies show that, when the UN comes
together, it more effectively addresses the capacity needs of the different
stakeholders (rights holders/duty bearers) so that they can be the agents of change.
UN joint efforts on capacity development have been crucial to strengthening
government policies and institutional capacities and to empowering those sectors of
society that are traditionally the most vulnerable, such as women, indigenous people,
youth, persons with disabilities, etc.
5. Some case studies have rightly included government and civil society in the
development processes, as, in many cases, the UN has been able to bring government
and civil society to the same table. This is important, as governments and civil society
often do not have a common platform or the systems to communicate and to develop
collaboration. In Mozambique, Yemen and Moldova, civil society was associated from
the start, helping develop national ownership and commitment. Even in countries
where there are difficulties in bringing government and civil society together, such as
in Nepal (where the politicization of the transitional justice mechanisms has led the UN
to concentrate its efforts on working with conflict victims to the detriment of the
transitional justice structures themselves), it is important to maintain and
communicate a clear position in line with fundamental international values and
commitments to human rights (something that is being done in Nepal with the
creation of the UN TJ Task Force). The case of Mozambique also demonstrates the
potential of the UN facilitating South-South partnership in linking the normative and
operational.

Key lessons learned from the case studies

1. The case studies demonstrate the importance of leadership in the UN System. Some
case studies pay tribute to the leadership role played by the RC as a key element of
 success. Having a RC with the strategic vision, commitment and leadership contributes
67
immensely to the success of the strategy (as in Albania, Moldova and Nepal). In
addition to the strong leadership role of the RC, a strong and committed UNCT –
including the leadership of relevant normative agencies – is equally critical. As
normative support of the UNCT increases, it becomes more important than ever for
the RC and UNCT to act as One Leader.
2. Delivering together is key to relevance and results. The case studies highlight
collaboration between two to six UN agencies. They also show that the UN’s
international norms and standards help to forge a common goal and vision so that
every agency can contribute its best on the basis of its comparative advantage and
area of competency. This indicates that joint programmes with a division of labour that
recognizes the expertise and technical capacity of the agencies enable a more holistic
and effective programming strategy. Some of the case studies are based on joint
programmes, while others adopted less formal mechanisms for joint actions, such as
the Yemen case study. Either way, all case studies recognize the value of joint actions;
having a common framework and a clear structure enhances implementation and
facilitates results. Interesting examples of how each agency can contribute to a specific
outcome have been highlighted; the Moldova case study, for example, shows each UN
agency taking the lead on selected articles of the CRPD.
3. Invisible drivers of success include communication and networking, social skills and
sustained commitment. When addressing the human factor, various aspects create
enabling conditions for the success of the case studies. Not all success drivers are
technical or programmatic. However, these are largely not reported in the
documentation, a fact that became clear from the Skype interviews with UNCT
members and national counterparts that the author of this report held during the case
study validation. Certain case studies stem from individual UN staff initiative and
commitment rather than from a request for assistance from the government or civil
society (e.g., Equal Access to Justice in Guatemala). In this context, in order to
convince national partners of the need for a change, the UN must strongly advocate
and raise awareness amongst its partners until national counterparts are supportive of
the strategy. This requires sustained and vigorous communication skills, a good
capacity for networking with national partners (and donors where possible), and a
degree of persuasion to show that the changes will result in a ‘win-win’ situation for all
stakeholders. While difficult to show and with little supportive evidence to sustain this
point in this report, the lesson here is that human communication and social skills are
 also key factors of success that need to be recognized and factored into the planning
68
of strategic interventions.
4. Societal changes take time. The case studies also highlight the fact that changes
require a long period in order to take effect, and no one should expect a ‘Cinderella
effect’ from UN interventions (i.e., Member State turning into an international
standard champion on the flip of the UN wand). Hence, there is a need for sustained
long-term commitment from the UN. In Albania, CEDAW was ratified in 1993, but the
country still needs assistance in implementing the recommendations, more than 20
years later. The efforts regarding social protection in Mozambique started 10 years
ago. The work on transitional justice in Nepal started after the signing of the CPA in
2006 and, at the time of the case study submission, the two transitional justice
commissions were still not functional. Changes of attitude and behaviour, such as
those concerning gender equality, require a long time – indeed, generations – to take
root. In other words, a single programme or intervention can be a good starting point
to initiate changes, but it should be clear that some changes can only fully be
appraised over the long term. The lesson here is that a sustained commitment from
the UN is required and that the process should not be abandoned once the project’s or
programme’s pro forma objectives have been completed. International norms and
standards remain the driver to sustain the UN’s commitment to its objectives after the
conclusion of specific interventions. It can also be used to further extend to some
specific aspects of the strategy that could not be fully implemented during the
intervention itself (e.g., Bolivia).
5. Success in applying international norms and standards is not always entirely
contingent on grand funding. For example, targeted advocacy in Fiji and China
produced results at very low cost. Similarly, the UNIPP project in Bolivia was initially
funded with a very small budget – US$190,000 over two years, albeit with additional
EU funding of over US$1 million. In Moldova, the CRPD implementation project was
US$372,570 over two years for the four UN agencies. Financial resources are therefore
not necessarily a precondition for the successful application of normative principles,
especially if the entry points are strategic, thus making UN support clearly efficient in
terms of value-for-money. Of course, sufficient, predictable and sustained funding will
always remain indispensable for such work.
6. More efforts are needed to communicate and report UN results in normative and
policy areas. As the UN moves increasingly away from service delivery and towards
policy and normative support, it becomes more imperative for the UN to better
communicate results in these areas. The UN remains better at saying what it does than
69
at what it achieves. To provide a more comprehensive vision of the UN’s added value,
the message of the operational value of the UN’s international norms and standards
needs to get out better. This requires ‘telling the story’ of what has been achieved and
how.
Conclusions and recommendations 70

The case studies show the diversity of the application of the UN’s international norms
and standards, ranging from quick and targeted advocacy leading to legislative change to
sustained long-term programming over a decade. They offer valuable insights into how the
UN’s international norms and standards and core programming principles – particularly its
human rights-based approach and promotion of gender equality – have helped Member States
develop and implement more internationally compliant legislation and practice. Specifically,
the strongest recipe for the successful integration of the UN’s international norms and
standards into its operational work at country level will include 1) an integrated, holistic vision
combining advocacy, awareness-raising, capacity development, concrete demonstrative
results, participation of all national stakeholders in an inclusive process and work at the policy
and legislative levels to ensure that national legislation is fully compliant with international
standards and 2) a dedicated UN team headed by a committed UN Resident Coordinator and
supported by long-term leadership from regional offices and HQ. In addition, the
communication skills and social networking capacities of the UN, while less tangible and
quantifiable, are nevertheless crucial human factors worthy of consideration and planning at
the inception of an activity.
In line with the post-2015 agenda and the SDGs, the UN’s international norms and
standards should remain the foundation of strategic UN programming. In a globalized world of
increasing complexity, supporting Member States in applying international standards and
being the guarantor of international norms are integral parts of the work of the UN System.
Over time, this will increase the number of fully compliant Member States (i.e., with respect to
the UN frameworks and legislation that they have approved) and empower civil societies in the
spirit of respect for all human rights and their underlying core UN values.
With respect to the 2030 Agenda, the UN System will need to:

1. Ensure that UNCTs fully embrace human rights-based approaches to programming as

the core of their work and use the UN Charter and the unique mandate of the UN
regarding human rights as a source of comparative advantage.
2. Ensure common understanding, language and advocacy regarding international norms
and standards. Not all agencies are equally focused on international norms and
standards, and their understanding of the relevance of these norms and standards to
their work may vary. Common messages from the principal actors regarding the
 operationalization of international norms and standards would help to forge a
71
common vision and commitment across UN agencies.
3. Develop strong leaders and staff – including national staff – across the UN System who
can be agents for change and inspire governments and citizens to uphold the UN
values; rally the UN System to support them.
4. Use the UN’s international norms and standards to break down sectoral and
organizational silos to achieve inter-agency integration.
5. Ensure long-term commitment and support to the core UN values beyond the period
of a specific programme or the term of an individual RC or UNDAF programming
framework. In order to ensure continuity, investment in capacity development of UN
national staff and government and other national stakeholders with respect to the
core values of the UN is critical.
6. Develop staff capacity and skills to advocate the fundamental values of the UN’s
international norms and standards. Strengthen system-wide knowledge management
and sharing of thematic- and country-specific expertise, tools, experience and
knowledge.
7. Build the evidence base for development frameworks based on the application of
normative principles. Academic institutions and NGOs can have a valuable role in
developing national capacities. Led by national demand and in coordination with
governments, the UN development system should explore opportunities to connect
academic institutions and NGOs, as such connections would improve the links between
research, practical learning and innovation.
8. Ensure that UNDAF Results Groups and other relevant coordination mechanisms
within UNCTs have normative and operational focus, capacity and policy support.
9. Strengthen regional UNDG teams’ role in quality assurance, including with respect to
the application of normative principles in development frameworks. The regional
UNDG teams are important in ensuring the quality of UNDAFs anchored in the UN’s
normative mandates and standards. To do this, the regional UNDG teams can facilitate
the sharing of expertise, information and capacities and ensure that UNCTs have
access to the UN’s normative expertise.
Annex: International norms and standards 72

International human rights treaties

Treaty Treaty body Number of

State parties as
of 17 August
2015

International Convention on the Elimination of Committee on the Elimination of Racial 177

All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965) (ICERD) Discrimination (CERD)

International Covenant on Civil and Political Human Rights Committee (CCPR) 168
Rights (1966) (ICCPR)
Optional Protocol (1966) 115
Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, aiming at 81
the abolition of the death penalty (1989)

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural 164
Cultural Rights (1966) (ICESCR) Rights (CESCR)
Optional Protocol (2008) 21

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Committee on the Elimination of 189

Discrimination against Women (1979) (CEDAW) Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)
Optional Protocol (1999) 106

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Committee against Torture (CAT) 158
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
(1984) (CAT)

Optional Protocol to the Convention against Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and 79

Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment (2002) (OPCAT) Treatment or Punishment (SPT)

Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) 195
(CRC) Optional Protocol to the CRC on the
involvement of children in armed conflict (2000) 159
Optional Protocol to the CRC on the sale of 169
children, child prostitution and child
pornography (2000)
Optional Protocol to the CRC on a
communications procedure (2011) 17

International Convention on the Protection of Committee on Migrant Workers (CMW) 48

the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members
of Their Families (1990) (ICMW)

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Committee on the Rights of Persons with 157
Disabilities (2006) (CRPD) Disabilities (CRPD)
Optional Protocol (2006) 86

International Convention for the Protection of All Committee on Enforced Disappearances 50

Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006) (CED)
(ICPED)
In addition to the International Bill of Rights and the core human rights treaties, there are
73
many other universal instruments relating to human rights. A non-exhaustive selection is listed
below.

WORLD CONFERENCE ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND MILLENNIUM ASSEMBLY

Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action

United Nations Millennium Declaration

THE RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION

United Nations Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and

Peoples

General Assembly resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, "Permanent sovereignty over
natural resources"

International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries

RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND MINORITIES

Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169)

Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic
Minorities

PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION

Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100)

Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111)

International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)

Declaration on Race and Racial Prejudice

Convention against Discrimination in Education

Protocol Instituting a Conciliation and Good Offices Commission to be responsible for seeking a
settlement of any disputes which may arise between States Parties to the Convention against
Discrimination in Education
Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on
74
Religion or Belief

World Conference against Racism, 2001 (Durban Declaration and Programme of Action)

RIGHTS OF WOMEN

Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action

Agreed conclusions of the Commission on the Status of Women

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)

Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women (CEDAW-OP)

Declaration on the Protection of Women and Children in Emergency and Armed Conflict

Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women

RIGHTS OF THE CHILD

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)

Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child
prostitution and child pornography (CRC-OPSC)

Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children
in armed conflict (CRC-OPAC)

Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138)

Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182)

RIGHTS OF OLDER PERSONS

United Nations Principles for Older Persons

RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons

Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons

Principles for the protection of persons with mental illness and the improvement of mental
75
health care

Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities

HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE: PROTECTION OF PERSONS SUBJECTED

TO DETENTION OR IMPRISONMENT

Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners

Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners

Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or
Imprisonment

United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty

Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
(CAT)

Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT)

Principles of Medical Ethics relevant to the Role of Health Personnel, particularly Physicians, in
the Protection of Prisoners and Detainees against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Principles on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty

Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials

Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials

United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules)

United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (The Beijing
Rules)

Guidelines for Action on Children in the Criminal Justice System

United Nations Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency (The Riyadh Guidelines)
76
Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power

Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary

Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers

Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors

Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary
Executions

Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation

International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for
Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules) - PDF

Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to
combat impunity

SOCIAL WELFARE, PROGRESS AND DEVELOPMENT

Declaration on Social Progress and Development

Universal Declaration on the Eradication of Hunger and Malnutrition

Declaration on the Use of Scientific and Technological Progress in the Interests of Peace and
for the Benefit of Mankind

Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Peace

Declaration on the Right to Development

Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights

Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity

PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Principles relating to the status of national institutions (The Paris Principles)

Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to
77
Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training

MARRIAGE

Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of Marriages

Recommendation on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage and Registration of

Marriages

RIGHT TO HEALTH

Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS

RIGHT TO WORK AND TO FAIR CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT

Employment Policy Convention, 1964 (No. 122)

FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION

Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87)

Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98)

SLAVERY, SLAVERY-LIKE PRACTICES AND FORCED LABOUR

Slavery Convention

Protocol amending the Slavery Convention signed at Geneva on 25 September 1926

Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and
Practices Similar to Slavery

Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29)

Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105)

Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the
Prostitution of Others

Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and
Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized
Crime

RIGHTS OF MIGRANTS
International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members
78
of Their Families (ICPMW)

Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, supplementing the United
Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime

NATIONALITY, STATELESSNESS, ASYLUM AND REFUGEES

Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness

Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons

Convention relating to the Status of Refugees

Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees

Declaration on the Human Rights of Individuals who are not nationals of the country in which
they live

WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, INCLUDING GENOCIDE

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against
Humanity

Principles of international co-operation in the detection, arrest, extradition and punishment of

persons guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity

Statute of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

HUMANITARIAN LAW

Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War

Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the
Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I)

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the
Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II)
Also available:
79
Ratifications and Reservations

Status of ratifications and signatures of human rights instruments

CD Compilation of International instruments - Universal instruments

Conventions, Declarations and Other Instruments found in General Assembly Resolutions

(since 1946)