Law of Sea or Maritime Jurisdiction
Law of Sea or Maritime Jurisdiction
Law of Sea or Maritime Jurisdiction
1. Territorial seas
a. It is that part of the sea which is directly next to the coastline and bounded by the high seas.
b. Article 2 of the Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and Article 3 of the UN Convention on
law of seas, both express that states exercise sovereignty over this zone subject to the provisions of the
respective conventions and other rules of international law.
c. The territorial sea forms an undeniable part of the land territory.
d. According to UNCLOS, it is believed that every coastal state has territorial sea. The sovereignty of the
coastal state extends to the sea-bed and sub-soil of the territorial sea and the airspace above it.
e. The coastal States exercise a wide variety of exclusive power over the territorial sea which depends
largely on the municipal law rather the international system.
f. Coastal states can control the entry of foreign vessels from trading or fishing activities to preserve it
for their own citizens.
g. Width of the Territorial Sea
• Width of the territorial sea up to which the states can exercise sovereignty has been subjected to a
long line of historical development.
• Article 3 of the 1982 Convention, however, notes that all states have the right to establish the
breadth of the territorial sea up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles from the baselines. This
is clearly in line with state practice
CASE LAW: Low water line
It was the Anglo Norwegian Fisheries case which propounded the principle regarding the
determination of the baseline w.r.t geographical realities. In this case, the method applied by the
Norwegians affected the fishing interest of UK because the straight baseline method applied then
created a chance to cover those parts of the sea which belonged to High-Sea zone. The court
upheld the straight baseline method applied by Norway due to the peculiar nature of its coastline.
The method that determines the rule regarding the 12 Nautical miles limit depends mainly on the
nature of the state’s geographic position, normally Low water line is preferred however in cases
of countries like Norway straight baseline method can be applied.
h. The Right of Innocent Passage:
• The right of foreign merchant ships (as distinct from warships) to pass unhindered through the
territorial sea of coast has long been an accepted principle in customary international law, the
sovereignty of the coast state notwithstanding.
• UNCLOS in its Article 19 provides for an exhaustive list of activities for which the passage is
considered as innocent, the main factor to keep in mind is peace, good order, or security of the
coastal State. Article 24 prohibits coastal States from hampering the innocent passage of foreign
ships through the territorial sea unless specifically authorized by other Articles of the LOSC.
i. Other aspects of the territorial sea are:
• Internal water: As per Article 8 of UNCLOS, internal waters include that part of the sea which
does not belong to either the high seas or the territorial rather covers all the waterways on the
landward side of the baseline. One of the major differences between the territorial sea and the
internal water is that there exists no right of innocent passage in case of the former.
• Bays: Bays are one of the major complex issues under maritime laws, it may enclose a line
which leaves internal waters on its landward side and provides a baseline for delimiting the
territorial sea.
• Islands: The 1958 convention defines Islands consist of a naturally formed area of land,
surrounded by water, which is above water at high tide. These islands are capable of forming
continental shelf zone, Exclusive Economic zone, Contiguous zone, territorial sea zone however
if there is no habitat capable of surviving on an island it may not form EEZ. Where there exists a
chain of islands which are less than 24 miles apart, a continuous band of the territorial sea may
be generated.
• Archipelagic states: Group of Islands: The states having above such characteristics has
sovereignty over the waters enclosed by the baselines subject to limitations created by the
provisions of this Part of the convention. These limitations consist of the right of innocent
passage for ships of all states, and, unless the archipelagic state designates sea lanes and air
routes, the right of archipelagic sea lanes passage through the routes normally used for
international navigation.
2. Contiguous zone
a. It is that part of the sea which is located beyond and adjacent to the territorial waters of the coastal
states. The development of this zone arose due to the need of the state to strengthen its regulation over
the territorial sea.
b. It extends up to 12 nautical miles from the territorial sea.
c. The objective of this zone is only for certain purposes as provided in the article 24 of the convention
like to prevent infringement of customs, immigration or sanitary laws of the coastal state, or to
conserve fishing stocks in a particular area, or to enable the coastal state to have exclusive or principal
rights to the resources of the proclaimed zone. The formation of this zone is only for special purposes
as prescribed in the convention, it does not provide any air and space rights to the states.
3. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
a. The object for this zone arose due to controversy regarding fishing zones. Due to a lack of regulation
of limit regarding fishing zone, states began to claim the wide depth of region under this zone.
b. In the case of Tunisia vs Libya, the court regarded that the concept of Exclusive Economic Zone can
be associated as a part of Customary International Law.
c. Article 55 of the UNCLOS describes the extension of this region from the baseline is up to 200
nautical miles from the breadth of the territorial sea.
d. In the case of Coastal states as per article 56 of the convention, these states have sovereign rights over
the Exclusive Economic Zone for the purpose like:
• Exploiting and exploring, conserving and managing natural resources
• or the establishment of an artificial island, Marine Scientific research
e. Other rights as specified in part IV of the convention
f. In case of other states, it provides rights and duties of that which can be compared to the high seas such
as freedom of navigation, laying of pipelines and submarine cables, they have to keep in mind the
rights and duties of Coastal states during the exercise of their own power.
4. Continental Shelf
a. This zone arose due to the concept of Geography.
b. As per 1982 convention, it includes a natural seaward extension of a land boundary. This seaward
extension is geologically formed as the seabed slopes away from the coast, typically consisting of a
gradual slope (the continental shelf proper), followed by a steep slope (the continental slope), and then
a more gradual slope leading to the deep seabed floor. The limit up to which its length extends up to
200 nautical miles.
c. These three areas, collectively known as the continental margin, are rich in natural resources, including
oil, natural gas and certain minerals.
d. The coastal states exercise an extensive sovereign-rights over this zone for the purpose of exploiting its
resources.
e. The coastal state may, under article 80 of the 1982 Convention, construct and maintain installations
and other devices necessary for exploration on the continental shelf and is entitled to establish safety
zones around such installations to a limit of 500 metres, which must be respected by ships of all
nationalities.
f. EEZ and Continental shelf is almost similar in nature however the major point of difference between
the two is that under the 1982 convention a continental shelf can exist without an EEZ but there cannot
be an EEZ without the demarcation of the Continental shelf.
g. Delimitation of the continental shelf
• The measurement of the range of this zone has led to several controversies and a long line of
legal custom that has led to the need for the evolution of this concept.
• In the case of Nicaragua vs Honduras, the international court has dictated on the importance of
the establishment of a maritime boundary. The concept of the median line has been used to
determine the delimitation of the territorial sea within the opposite and the adjacent coast.
Initially, the issue was taken up in the North Sea Continental Shelf cases, wherein the Court
took the view that delimitation was based upon consideration and weighing of relevant factors in
order to produce an equitable result.
• Later, in the case of Libya Vs Malta, the Court emphasised the close relationship between
continental shelf and economic zone delimitations and held that the appropriate methodology was
first to provisionally draw an equidistant line and then to consider whether circumstances existed
which must lead to an adjustment of that line.