Chapter 1 Introduction To Psychological Assessment
Chapter 1 Introduction To Psychological Assessment
Assessment
Testing= Measure
Assessment= Answering a referral question RA 10029 Philippine Psychology
Act of 2009
Testing Assessment
Objective
Process
The tester is not key to the process; The assessor is key to the process of
practically speaking, one tester may be selecting tests and/or other tools of
substituted for another tester without evaluation as well as in drawing conclusions
appreciably affecting the evaluation. from the entire evaluation.
Skill of Evaluator
Psychometrician Psychologists
The Tools of Psychological Assessment
a. The Test -just like how medical science have medical tests, psychology have
psychological tests
i. Format varies: Pencil and paper, digital, ii. Administration procedures: One-on-
one, group
iii. Scoring and Interpretation varies
iv. Scoring is the process of assigning suchevaluative codes or statements to
performance on tests, tasks, interviews or other behavioral samples
The next time you have occasion to stream a video, fire-up that Blu-ray player, or
even break- out an old DVD, take a moment to consider the role that video can
play in assessment. In fact, specially created videos are widely used in training and
evaluation contexts. For example, corporate personnel may be asked to respond
to a variety of video-presented incidents of sexual harassment in the workplace.
Police personnel may be asked how they would respond to various types of
emergencies, which are presented either as reenactments or as video recordings
of actual occurrences. Psychotherapists may be asked to respond with a
diagnosis and a treatment plan for each of several clients presented to them on
video. The list of video’s potential applications to assessment is endless.
ii. Psychologists – They can administer, score, and interpret psychological tests
(including projective tests). They can also diagnose and give psychotherapy to
people who are suffering from mental disorders.
The test taker We have all been test takers. However, we have not all approached
tests in the same way. On the day a test is to be administered, test takers may
vary with respect to numerous variables, including these:
■ The amount of test anxiety they are experiencing and the degree to which
that test anxiety
might significantly affect their test results
■ The extent to which they understand and agree with the rationale for the
assessment
■ Their capacity and willingness to cooperate with the examiner or to
comprehend written test
instructions
■ The amount of physical pain or emotional distress they are experiencing
■ The amount of physical discomfort brought on by not having had enough to
eat, having had
too much to eat, or other physical conditions
■ The extent to which they are alert and wide awake as opposed to nodding off
■ The extent to which they are predisposed to agree or disagree when
presented with stimulus statements
■ The extent to which they have received prior coaching
■ The importance they may attribute to portraying themselves in a good (or
bad) light
■ The extent to which they are, for lack of a better term, “lucky” and can “beat
the odds” on a
multiple-choice achievement test (even though they may not have learned the
subject matter).
d. Society at large -it exerts effort to determine what tests must be developed or be
removed. The societal need for “organizing” and “systematizing” has historically
manifested itself in such varied questions as “Who is a witch?,” “Who is
schizophrenic?,” and “Who is qualified?” The specific questions asked have
shifted with societal concerns. The methods used to determine the answers
have varied throughout history as a function of factors such as intellectual
sophistication and religious preoccupation. Society at large exerts its influence as
a party to the assessment enterprise in many ways. As society evolves and as the
need to measure different psychological variables emerges, test developers respond
by devising new tests.
a. Educational setting
ii. Aptitude test – Tests that measure a person’s potential cognitive ability
iii. Diagnostic test – Tests that measure what a person knows about a
certain topic or subject (Quizzes can be a formed of this) iv. School
grades/cards
b. Clinical Setting
i. Psychotherapy assessment
The tests employed in clinical settings may be intelligence tests, personality tests,
neuropsychological tests, or other specialized instruments, depending on the
presenting or suspected problem area. The hallmark of testing in clinical settings is
that the test or measurement technique is employed with only one individual at a time.
Group testing is used primarily for screening—that is, identifying those individuals
who require further diagnostic evaluation.
d. Geriatric Settings