0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Lecture 04

probability

Uploaded by

idly.sambar.rice
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Lecture 04

probability

Uploaded by

idly.sambar.rice
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Probability Theory and Random

Processes (MA225)
Lecture Slides
Lecture 04
Independence

Observe that P(B1 |W ) = 9/34 < 1/2 = P(B1 ), whereas


P(B2 |W ) = 5/17 > 1/6 = P(B2 ). Thus the “occurrence of one
event is making the occurrence of a second event more or less likely”.

Def: Let A and B be two events. They are said to be


a) negatively associated if P(A ∩ B) < P(A)P(B) ,
b) positively associated if P(A ∩ B) > P(A)P(B) ,
c) independent if P(A ∩ B) = P(A)P(B) .
I If P(B) = 0 then A and B are independent.
I If P(B) = 1 then A and B are independent.
I In particular any event A is independent of S and φ.

Theorem: If A and B are independent, so are A and B c , Ac and B,


Ac and B c .
Def: A countable collection of events E1 , E2 , . . . are said to be
pairwise independent if Ei and Ej are independent for i 6= j.
Def: A finite collection of events E1 , E2 , . . . , En are said to be
independent(or mutually independent) if for any sub-collection
En1 , . . . , Enk of E1 , E2 , . . . , En ,
k
\  k
Y
P Enk = P(Eni ) .
i=1 i=1

Def: A countable collection of events E1 , E2 , . . . are said to be


independent if any finite sub-collection are independent.
Remarks

I To verify the independence of E1 , E2 , . . . , En we must check


2n − n − 1 conditions. For example, for n = 3, the conditions that
need to be checked are
P(E1 ∩ E2 ) = P(E1 )P(E2 ), P(E1 ∩ E3 ) = P(E1 )P(E3 ), P(E2 ∩ E3 ) =
P(E2 )P(E3 ), P(E1 ∩ E2 ∩ E3 ) = P(E1 )P(E2 )P(E3 ).
I Independence implies pairwise independence.
I Pairwise independence does not imply independence in general.
Example 1: Let S = {HH, HT , TH, TT }. Suppose all elementary
events are equally likely. Let E1 = {HH, HT }, E2 = {HH, TH} and
E3 = {HH, TT }. Then E1 , E2 , E3 are pairwise independent but not
independent because

1/4 = P(E1 ∩ E2 ∩ E3 ) 6= P(E1 )P(E2 )P(E3 ) = 1/8 .


I P(E1 ∩ E2 ∩ E3 ) = P(E1 )P(E2 )P(E3 ) is also not sufficient.
Example 2: Let S = {(i, j) : i = 1, . . . , 6, j = 1, . . . , 6}. Suppose all
elementary events are equally likely. Define E1 = {1st roll is 1, 2 or 3},
E2 = {1st roll is 3, 4 or 5} and E3 = {Sum of the rolls is 9}.
Def: Given an event C two events A and B are said to be
conditionally independent if P(A ∩ B|C ) = P(A|C )P(B|C ).
Example 3: A box contains two coins: a fair coin and one fake
two-headed coin (P(H)=1). You choose a coin at random and toss it
twice. Define the following events.
A= First coin toss results in a H. B= Second coin toss results in a H.
C= Coin 1 (regular) has been selected.
Then A and B are conditionally independent given C . Are A and B
independent?

You might also like