Course-Pack - M.Tech 3rd Sem Final
Course-Pack - M.Tech 3rd Sem Final
FRAMEWORK
The Course Pack is a comprehensive and complete pedagogical guideline document that describes the components of
instruction delivery by a faculty member. It consists of the scheme of the course, Course Overview, Course Objectives,
Prerequisite course, Program-specific Outcomes (PSOs), Course outcomes (COs), Bloom’s taxonomy (Knowledge Levels),
Types of Courses, Course articulation matrix, Course assessment patterns, Course content, Lesson Plan, Bibliography,
Problem-based learning/case-studies/clinical, and Student-Centred learning (self-learning towards life-long-learning).
It not only provides a uniform design of Course delivery across the University but also ensures freedom and flexibility to
introduce innovations in learning and teaching and create vivid kinds of assessment tools (alternate assessment tools)
by a faculty member.
The course pack is developed by the faculty member teaching a course. If more than one faculty
teaches the same course, all the faculty members teaching the course shall be formed as a cluster,
and a senior faculty member (Course-lead) lead the Course delivery design in a team effort. The
Course Pack provides ample scope and opportunity to bring innovations in teaching pedagogies in a
school/department.
Hence, the Course pack is a comprehensive learning-teaching strategy framework to be followed by
all the faculty members in schools/departments in the university. It is not only a tool for measuring
the learning of a class but also analyses the achievement levels (learning outcomes of the course) of
all the students in a class in a continuous manner.
Activity Credits Weekly Hours Total Number of Classes per Assessment in Weightage
Semester
Lecture 0 0
Tutorial
Instruction CIE SEE
Practical
Tutorial
Practical 2 4
Theory
delivery
0 4
Self-study
Total 3 8 00 60 50% 50%`
Course Lead Course Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma
Coordinator
2. COURSE OVERVIEW
The “Quantitative and Communication Proficiency - PR” course aims to equip students with the
necessary skills, knowledge, and mindset to thrive in the professional world. It focuses on developing
essential competencies that are crucial for success in various careers, including communication skills,
professional etiquette, problem solving abilities, adaptability, and self-awareness. Through a combination
of conceptual learning, practical exercises, case studies, and real-world simulations, students will enhance
their readiness to enter the workforce confidently and effectively.
3. COURSE OBJECTIVE
1. Develop effective communication skills for professional settings, including
written, verbal, and non-verbal communication.
2. Understand and demonstrate professional etiquette, including workplace norms,
ethics, and cultural sensitivity.
3. Enhance critical thinking and problem-solving abilities to address challenges
encountered in professional environments.
4. Cultivate adaptability and resilience to navigate changes and uncertainties in the
workplace.
5. Foster self-awareness and self-management skills for personal and professional
growth.
6. Learn techniques for effective time management, organization, and prioritization
of tasks.
7. Develop teamwork and collaboration skills through group projects and activities.
8. Gain insights into leadership principles and practices for aspiring leaders &
4. PREREQUISITE COURSE
PREREQUISITE COURSE REQUIRED YES
PO1 An ability to independently carry out research /investigation and development work to solve practical problems.
Students should be able to demonstrate a degree of mastery over the area as per the specialization of the program.
PO3 The mastery should be at a level higher than the requirements in the appropriate bachelor program:
Engineering Knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an
PO3.1 engineering specialization to the solution of complex Computer Science and engineering problems.
Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex Computer Science and
engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences,
PO3.2 and engineering sciences.
Design/Development of Solutions: Design solutions for complex Computer Science and engineering problems and
design system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the
PO3.3 public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems: Use research-based knowledge and research methods including
design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid
PO3.4 conclusions.
Modern Tool Usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT
tools including prediction and modeling to complex computer science and engineering activities with an
PO3.5 understanding of the limitations.
The Engineer and Society: Apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety,
PO3.6 legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
Environment and Sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and
PO3.7 environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of the engineering
PO3.8 practice.
Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and
PO3.9 in multidisciplinary settings.
Communication: Communicate effectively on complex Computer Science and engineering activities with the
engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports
PO3.10 and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and
management principles and apply these to one's own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects
PO3.11 and in multidisciplinary environments.
Life-Long Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and
PO3.12 life-long learning in the broadest context of technological changes in the field of Computer Science.
• Leadership Skills
• Time Management
• Introduction to Group Dynamics and Group Effectiveness
• Resume Writing
• Video Resume
• Group Discussion
• Preparing for Video Interview
• Interview FAQs and Do’s & Don’ts
• PI Concepts - APPLEIT
• Mock Interviews
• Dressing Etiquette
• Syllogism
• Data Arrangement
• Seating Arrangement
• Crypto Maths
• Calendars
• Venn Diagram
UNIT 8: Revision
CO-3 Analyze the transition of campus to corporate and prepare for professional adaptation
PO3.11
PO3.12
POs
PO3.5
PO3.1
PO3.3
PO3.4
PO3.6
PO3.2
PO3.7
PO3.8
PO3.9
PO2
PO1
Cos
2 2
CO-1*
2 1 1 2
CO-2
2 1 2 2
CO-3
1 2
CO-4
Self-study
Self-study
Practical
Practical
Type of Course Remarks
Tutorial
Tutorial
Theory
Theory
Total
Total
Total no. of
classes
REFERENCE BOOKS:
LABORATORY 25 25 50 50 100
*
Passing Criteria-30% of marks to be secured in the lab Exam conducted by two examiners (one internal and one external)
The ability to use and apply the knowledge in different ways may not be the focus of the assessment. With regard
to designing assessments, the faculty members must be willing to put in the time required to create a valid, reliable
assessment, that ideally would allow students to demonstrate their understanding of the information while remaining.
The following are the five main areas that assessment reporting should cover.
1. Learning Outcomes: At the completion of a program, students are expected to know their knowledge, skills, and
attitude. Depending on whether it is a UG or PG program, the level of sophistication may be different. There should
be no strict rule on the number of outcomes to be achieved, but the list should be reasonable, and well-organized.
2. Assessable Outcomes: After a given learning activity, the statements should specify what students can do to
demonstrate. Criteria for demonstration are usually addressed in rubrics and there should be specific examples of
work that doesn’t meet expectations, meets expectations, and exceeds expectations. One of the main challenges
is faculty communication whether all faculty agreed on explicit criteria for assessing each outcome. This can be a
difficult accomplishment when multiple sections of a course are taught or different faculty members. Hence there
is a need for common understanding among the faculty on what is assessed and how it is assessed.
3. Assessment Alignment: This design of an assessment is sometimes in the form of a curriculum map, which can be
created in something as easy as an Excel spreadsheet. Courses should be examined to see which program outcomes
they support, and if the outcome is assessed within the course. After completion, program outcomes should be
mapped to multiple courses within the program.
4. Assessment Planning: Faculty members need to have a specific plan in place for assessing each outcome. Outcomes
don’t need to be assessed every year, but faculty should plan to review the assessment data over a reasonable period
of time and develop a course of action if the outcome is not being met.
5. Student Experience: Students in a program should be fully aware of the expectations of the program. The program
outcomes are aligned on the syllabus so that students are aware of what course outcomes they are required to
meet, and how the program outcomes are supported. Assessment documents should clearly communicate what is
being done with the data results and how it is contributing to the improvement of the program and curriculum.
Designing quality assessment tools or tasks involves multiple considerations if it is to be fit for purpose. The set of
assessments in a course should be planned to provide students with the opportunity to learn as they engage with
formative tasks as well as the opportunity to demonstrate their learning through summative tasks. Encouraging the
student through the use of realistic, authentic experiences is an exciting challenge for the course faculty team, who
are responsible for the review and quality enhancements to assessment practices.
b) Summative assessment
The goal of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning at the end of a Course by comparing it against some
standard or benchmark. Examples of summative assessments include:
⚫ a final project
⚫ a paper
⚫ Semester-End Examination (For courses running in Semester mode)
⚫ End-Term Examination (For courses running in Annual Mode)
#
Typical Rubric for the Internal Assessments
Type of Assessment Tools QUIZ AAT$/MOOC Certifications
Internal Assessments 10 15
$
AAT is Literature survey, Seminar, Assignment, Term Paper, Slip Test (or) MOOC Certificate relevant to the course
@
Lab Work-15 marks + Lab Record-10 marks
*
Passing Criteria-30% of marks to be secured in the lab Exam conducted by two examiners (one internal and one external)
Technical
Type of Assessment Tools Preliminary Project Plan TRL-1 Viva-voce
Seminar
Course-based Project Work 05 05 10 05
PPP (Preliminary Project Plan): The preliminary project plan (PPP) provides an initial, overview of the project and all of its known
parameters. It outlines the project’s objectives, relevance to the program, merit, and conformity to current industry/ government
policy, proposed methodology, and expected outcomes. It should also include any known constraints related to the time
frame (Gantt Chart), budget, etc.
TRL (Technology Readiness Level)-1: Basic Research: Initial scientific research has been conducted. Principles are
qualitatively postulated and observed. Focus is on new discovery rather than applications.
12.4 Assessment Pattern for Two Credit MOOC Courses (Online/Self-Paced Learning)
LABORATORY 25 25 50 50 100
@
Lab Work-15 marks + Lab Record-10 marks
*
Passing Criteria-30% of marks to be secured in the lab Exam conducted by two examiners (one internal and one external)
SEMINAR/PROJECT/INTERNSHIP 25 25 50 50 100
@
Rubric to be specified by the concerned Faculty
Final Marks
CIE+SEE
Result Analysis
Experimental/
Identification
Methodology
Applicability
Conclusion/
Type of Course
Problem
Findings
Formulation
of Problem TRL (Technology Readiness Level) Presentation Viva Voce
Statement
20 (TRL-1 to TRL-4)
10 0 marks for 5 marks for 10 marks 15 marks 20 marks 10 10
no TRL TRL-1 for TRL-2 for TRL-3 for TRL-4
How many different words can be formed from the letters of the word ‘RAINBOW’ in which
39 W comes before N? K1
40 Two coins are tossed, find the probability that only one head is obtained. K1
41 Two dice are rolled, find the probability that the sum is equal to 5. K1
A box contains 4 chocobars and 4 ice creams. Tom eats 3 of them, by randomly choosing.
42 What is the probability of choosing 2 chocobars and 1 ice cream? K3
An experiment succeeds twice as often as it fails. What is the probability that in the next 5
43 trials there will be four successes? K3
44 If ABCD x 9 = DCBA, then K2
45 EAT + THAT = APPLE, find the values of all the letters. K3
Directions: The question given below has four groups of three statements each. Read the
statements in each group carefully and identify the group/groups where the third statement
logically follows the first two statements in the group. (A) No sitar is a guitar. No guitar is a
violin. No violin is a sitar. (B) Ragas are songs. Some pops are not songs. Some pops are not
ragas. (C) Some costume designers are not hair designers. All designers are not hair designers.
Some designers are not costume designers. (D) AC’s are not DC’s. Some DC’s are not BC’s.
Some AC’s are not BC’s. (1) Only B and D (2) Only A and D (3) Only B (4) Only A and B
46 (5) None of these K2