pecuniary that exclusive

: be
courts
or
assumed. the
presumption oflaw barred suitrelevantthosesuits right
ManiTewari, violate to
generally ofIntroduction.
Procedure, whicha
ovable
operty; of profits;or "Suits Section instituted such any try a case
Everyexistence that being of to Application
or in v. by of all civil isare
officer statute, principles
1981 a
(d)
charge (c) (b) (a) or jurisdiction Balkrishna, a to
which bring used of
for for for
to
16, inState,
a civil
should persongeneral mention of civil the nature 1973. almost
a
forother ALJ
be as of a a naturesuits a criminal
to
foreclosure, the
the instituted C.P.C. the suit civilcognisance suit However,
the upon it the right principles1317.]
having
of mean
is governed and
rmination partitionrecovery
limitations in shall
court withappoints
jurisdictionmade to
be AIR natural
nature. in areordinarilyof of ORIGINAL
Petitions
nature
PETITION
immovable a
deals respect
of be institute 1953 a A this
within civil civil formal
a
in by
where
regard grievance ofsuit
justice, is
sale of the institutedin in contexteither nature. practice,then Code
ofprescribed with Nag law (Anand naturetried
applications or CHAPTER 6
immovable
or lowest
favourthis
of is
the
immovable of a
to said can
or it Suits
property;
redemption
of subject-matter the their 302.]
a suit of on expressly
behalf. in is of
the
by civil of Babu jurisdiction
that and
According civil governedCivilthe
any placegrade a It to be
grounds
bysubject-matter.
pecuniary, presenting jurisdiction in
civil challenged be even the words for
are
other property;property any There court is
Agarwal
a impliedly court. Procedure,
competent of nature a
civil or civilseeking somewhat
in fundamental of executive to Petitions' by
right thsituate.Subject
e law, suing are should impliedly theofcourt
with a in general
court Section Every the
territorial v. in
case suits different plaint has, barred legal Code 1908
to which Every a Ajodhya a civil has identical
or to not civil and civil person and
independently policy. orders,
barred. 9,
or of
without try to principle when court, jurisdiction court remedy. except
of
interest a lays it. suit grades court,
be that C.P.C., Suits'
Criminal
mortgage or the
(R.V.S. Prasad which except has whenterms
to
down shall other court lightly andevery it the It Suit are
rent the of of is is all a
1n

tolimitsdisposeshall record courtsalleged of suit instituted

subject-matter situate carries
of jurisdiction of wherewrong
obedience, theshall
defendant
the whereexercisewhich
tojurisdiction.
clearly:
provision two the whose
person where
Section According Providedpropertyattachment,
distraint
be or
limitationdefamatory
Section either following Theoption the on of or Section The th e
have
the to,
of may or to property within
the of a on instituted (f) (e)
jurisdictionbusiness the to oraforesaid court statement its the more be jurisdiction immovable
in
business, be
(b) (a) "Where
movablesubject-matter any
if local the relief is for for
resides in jurisdiction
of 19, jurisdictionsame uncertain 18, any instituted that
20, Calcutta A, A movables satisfied of to property situate
the is suit courts limits C.P.C., the court is the compensation the
aforesaid, C.P.C. section sought a in
of residing or a competent to situate
orresiding
C.P.C. plaintiff property, suit provisions relating
effect jurisdiction or property suit trecovery he
B. illustrations personally of that within of suit, withinpersonally the either :
cause that any contains is can
B or another of which is deals : as jurisdiction 17,
defendant to court
of provided immovable effect providedthe situate, ORIGINAL
PETITION
every relates may Delhi. in one for tothere C.P.C., in be obtain
held
of in in if laysdisputewith as the entire the within of
for
Delhi, compensation of the
action sue
Delhi, either works court the regards the that and local
the local
ofworks entirely
or by immovablewrong
suit attached tocourt, C.P.C. is that, if court relief
to A Wrong down th e propertythat ofclaim different actually in or the
beats and is property
thereupon ground provision the
shall
arises.othereither of for immovable
property.
suits propertylimits courts limits for within the respecting, on local to
publishes the the the was that are the the in
immovavle obtained
is behalf immovable
besuits B gain,
suit innature suitwere and for respect courts, gain." andcourt limits
in said fo r fo r cognizable
ofare for of property
It
instituted laysCalcutta Section19 defendant done
in respect proceed the isthe jurisdiction the
wrong
compensation voluntarily through
within of
Calcutta. courts." maywithin situate is its situate, uncertain.place
of local the or of
to in within and jurisdiction
one decreealleged property
the whose property;
down Calcutta be the compensation actually
be the
resides,
done ofvaluewith within
to of by thdefendant
e
limits
instituted suit his
in
instituted or explain
will place entertain anyinstitution value
such any local jurisdiction
that
a in B local the to uncertainty,
in Where resides,
in of
may local the for respect of
of of court.portiondispute may personal
court the the whose mnay, under
toDelhi.
"Subjectstatements or
limits person wrongS of the
thosewhich it
of limits
carrieslimits suing suit local suit and the be or for 97
Sue at is of
within where to
the the of
A
 the
prescribed." is the toarising at
Particulars ascertain lays
Section To its defendants thatresides, the gain:for orand more local
the
down presentation Section where goods to
either in works
admits. for
portion defandant,
unsound
of so plaint
shallThe basis
Delhi.
deliver understand atsole
"a) 20,
Explanation.-A
any or ic) for in timevoluntarily (b
than (alimits)
the (i) what accordingly
(h) (g) ( (e) d) (c) b) (a) the Thus,
B
26,Calcutta, B the such or ofany the
of carries by Aare principal
place one, of
purposes awhere of the the the where the the t he to
particulars
following a C.P.C. them
cause
gain, who carrT1es the of
statement his his
meaningful
is case defendant, whose
the resides, theat PLEADING.
relief facts factsmind, name, name, name be original it of a twherehe as do
ofcommencement
faras is a on in to on
theagent
the
claim, the contained
containthe clear lays where tradesman above corporation
offñce aforesaid, either
not jurisdction
of
jurisdiction plaintiff
constituting
showing
which statement a
plaintiffdescription of provision
they
description petitition a
plaint business." Calcutta.
East in it action,
reside,
defendant
business s , time
0r or DRAFTING
of the th e plaint that down has in
the court oT
the
Calcutta, provisions,: India the carTnes the each of
amount the that canbe Indian in also wholly
or following in must : plaint that" cause A shallacquiesce leave or or of of AND
value plaintiff has the tothe and or in may Calcutta. a or, personally
voluntarily the where
cOmmencement on the
the in
and
relinquished; allowed
so ascertained;
cause that
defendant and placewhich plaint. contain. suit. is such
Every of buys subordinate in beor
Railway
carry
of business,
CONVEYANCING
of court action sue tollowing respect deemed in incourt there
suit, defendants
ofallowed an onthe
court-fees,
the claims; effect;
of place particulars : Therefore, other Bgoods B part, such
ofthe important suit for personally
business, provided
or works actually are
subiject-matter a hasaction residence Order Comapny.
has carries
set-oïf is the illustrations oÌ to or
or
jurisdiction; of suit mannershall requests ofA office, anyinstitution;
arises. more
actually of
a arisen, carry isfor personally thewhere
and minorresidence is VII, it price
So or document is be Aand on cause
at n given,gain, and than suit,
far brought;of Rule instituted
when necessary as delivers
or of business on there
relinquished or the th e
suchOn business or
as of in attanh action of or One, works w
a plaintifi 1, may
the the it of C.PC. which Delhigoods the are
and arose, person the at
case usuit the to be by A i
a

facts called
is shall andmentioning is The shouldimportant
the particulars fullbeen age suit andmore the mentioned suit only a exclusive exercised officer.e.g. is
Presiding
Thechronological
should
in specify
claim. plaint brought.
regard
of
plaintiff not description of
numbered Particulars
and, name, without
(b) year The It (a)
facts The unsound (e) mention
(d) name instituted. (c)
constituting the be the plaintiffs is
beThe his mentioned, be The
Cause instituted Minor Particulars
parties. therefore, description should or e jurisdiction
thplaint In In by also Inthe In In InThere
complete.
should facts next in of of
mentioned. person re re the the the the
relation
tomaterial suit filled plaint
order the may the each like than place
natrimonial proper
cause mind, vz.
There shall civil Supreme
High HighCourt Court
offriend correct or have plaint. the No. be is
be constituting the there defendant Defendant and full 1,
name, in shall
no
action,The
to in aperson
in one,
2, and which
written. suite.g. byfor next original withCourt to Court
narrated The
of facts the cause
defendant may complete regarding
regarding of of need
separate statemnent or his to If description 3.the giving
t he mention Court District Munsif contain
aetion. vague
be guardianparticulars
name suffer. will the If father's there be All
place
is jurisdiction,
contain regard
or of ORIGINAL
PETITION
cause
of indicates particulars office jurisdiction. of
of be must one to
given the concerned a the Judicature mentioning the
mentioning
statement paras action unsound correct
As should postal plaintiff.-The of
be suit the to the of Judge East
The of plaint to by difficultly defendant.-Defendant name,
are or which residence filled of Supremea India
cause of be more name
action
in that a of such t h e subject-matter.
suit type
facts and the name statedmore the address No..... number etc. at.....
a duly must person the be andage of at at.
concise it person
than includes persons
made are respective
in number. of at. the of
therein of to when of mind,-Every minor. defendant.
efiect each Court New
or numbered. in
iscorrectly
anddefendants of
afterwards of jurisdiction the
particulars show action next and name
who serving
very should the
articulars shall one plaintiff plaint 2017. is Delhi. court
form Similarly,
it address numbered complete
address
postalagainst or
the contain defendant. name, plaintiff. court. left At of
the arose. inessential Thus other
should be ascertained be shall Hence, the th e in
relevant although
genuineness The such the by blank which
should made. suit of than whom given. father's
is
must which
in if summons the partythe tothere containnext th. In time court Judge
should plaintiff be its the suit by to like one are If
be COurt. we twhich
he
particulars be defendant Therefore,
one, suit of is the
the given bodyplaintiffJhall a ascertain 1, of name, stated plaint
file havingbeing or
filing
notavoided. minor before 2, the suit
same must of and the has the a is 99
be his in
the be 3.
 100
of of repeated
action
eterniiningcase. should plaint the of sue
out intentionally e litigation.
thwhole practicable,
meaning
disposed subjects necessary
claims.every
hiwhi
s fact
[Sidramappa ch Ltd., not fact not the
plaintalleged th e claim
particulars petitionomitted.
or fact
should
particulars iss appropriate
propert
the plots y
actiorn Causedisclosing pleadings
in be plaint The causearose
court (f) of The incause Order Order AlR
the any shall or
inThe be must and viz.
Sections be that a respect of in
Jurisdiction,-The causemust main th e of of in for 1979 alternative facts stated
required
is As bepleader is place. the
made. fgiar ven. action verhouses
mentioned the has of I , dispute ambiguityshouldstate whether
averments not. as of
inthis beI , v.the
of
a y Number
the relinquishes,actionclaim the framed RuleRajashetty, action cause SC wil may
jurisdiction. of be of
objective Rule thWhere in as
court 15court action the same rule
and plaintiff
is 134.] be
e
factually enable one be the
has
The to material be thplaint
e
If PLEADING,
to determined andwhich 2, 1, possible betomust clearly of
essential means of in inprecise in the
in 20 tohas portion
of where C.P.C. suit.
is toC.P.C. so
action. the the a the
pleaded
relief language pleaderalleged be be Plot case andDRAFTING
show
whichjurisdiction must any the
obviousprevent as AlR to concise suit and and
of It the
The to lays plaint
statement amount or
the verygiven.
specified. or isthe
the that would
plaint
be in
aforesaid so
portion provides
plaintiff
to prove
1970 bundle H.D.
a defendant
is the on grounds ofshould by if House,
related
the omitted a
intention that
aford be legally careful need same AND
claimed. a plaintifd further down was torm, filed the statute law
Code the must single established before
suit SC Vashishta claimed. other. ensure location,
be. The CONVEYANCI to NG
but not of all ground that
provision his that
is ofsufficient of but the f or the
and basis and should
court
should of suffice or litigation 1059.] based on in place
time
and
the contain suit entitled behind matters tacts. underwhich duly which dateon
property,
Civi!relevant relinquished.claim,omits every "Every essential he with the cause the The that
has for by A can As whereof drafting
and v. The recovery ofplaintiff court
surrounding be
be only the to final the precision.
to has which supported
is he to suit it
concerning cause Glaxo of the no
Procedure
jurisdiction
brought. all that sue is in suit succeed full
particulars tactSof to facts shall make dispute plaintiff facts dismiss lack stated been action to the relevant the mentioned
the in shall
to decision ofLaboratories
petition
mention the prevent shall, of ascertainmust h occurrencedescription cause ofof
the
ar1sing
reliefs not
respect action in There did plaintiff petition..
by boundaries
showing in which the a money, application
provide to whole includethe should them." to the gve particular is
afterwards respect upon as material arise material at
further far supportmeans case it suit earlier,
sho from such may the
try in o>, AlI
cause The th e (1 as of
ue tne ha or of be as is
o

74.] were jurisdiction

State
action, Rajaram, bethe foexercise r and and Thewhere indicates want to
10-A,
grant primary
to (AIR is apply tother
on he or pecuniary
shall the Mosis,
different
the having property Pulvarising
jurisdiction
adopted v. the
evidence suchexeption Nagarjun foundparty whena
advance the no same in provisioncourt Pecuniary (ii) delivered, A
Railway court (i) over facts This of court thOrder e
As th estate (g) suit he
foundation1957 torelief wholly
injurisdiction
reliefrelief (1995) Territorial proper
pleadings, aany Relief of for as AIR against they the must
proposes is that plaint
in to duty general alternative,
extent given of Industries can against Section subject-matter to an in VII,
the as onthe the Andhra specifically
which th e purpose Construction v. or 1951 assume can the
which Rule
of 2 court show
of relief
claimed.Order the Mad since be
Habibullah, in
jurisdiction.
important
hall
case aforesaidthe
he cause
court inrule as lowest in entertained whom reach
onl y to court
is
facts issues Pra. the claimed may
Code LJR plaint in part Bom Jurisdiction.-It that
a 20 the at 10
if and of v. a non-resident jurisdiction institute may
even the grade Jurisdiction.-For respect
determining
pecuniary (C ) it against suit any (1)
entitled of is
plaint.
784)
the always it payment Jai part
Company arose 125 is
with thfunction
e
returnshouldprovides
proved justice toand of
if general plaintiff byhad it
relief limits 357)] should Glass of at AIR seeking
of of
court stage ORIGINAL PETITION
do it shall Civil the the the the
the
to justice the has In the been be
competant
There plaint
of causeplace 1934 within (FB).] persons
of of be Code when arm suit. has suit of to of
plaint get in and Vishram given
which
not Procedure
VIE,
and
Ltd., foreigner the have the that
therule. evidence, been defendant is jurisdiction court the jurisdiction. A is
asked where
of All its of plaint
does case.
on not
and
not be Rule
the
are
guiding fled Chemicalsaction AIR
740;
jurisdiction-territorial,
Court of itthe who true has
pleader suit
been subject
Under to entitled
laid necessary as to jurisdiction. Civil cannot
the
rules the Arjun for.
thplaintiff
e 7try a
different fee.
in money 2007 if in law. are that proper instituted. at be
not A
impede provides it. suit see any
down in the to returned to
facts
plaintiff the his
And
court and Johnfactor
suit, Put.arose also,
Procedure.
India Butissue, within It the
contain relief
or v. to was(NOC) ordinarilyjurisdiction
would ensure stage
to must courts its plaintiff' s
that relief Ltd,there. (Gaekwa, an
it. are Irukulla written may claims provisions
established rules, procedure
meant the in
Devadoss and payable R.K. cannot process their
ofThe to
ask that market
a ought Thus, is
in for same accordance be AIR 1119 exception not that
specific the clear generalforor"every
think
in not Maheshwari (Bhagwan jurisdiction the rule be
statement." either instituted in [Sreenivasa be the
pecuniary
to this Shankariah, case awhich
India the 1985 (M.P). or Barodacause disclaim against
to the presented
rule v.value proper try suit
clearly of
upon court be then goods is courts court
just singlyplaint
with with Ruth value Rul e
prayer given is where there shall of
Cal of v. to it. for 101
the can an the to
 102
Mowaji,market not ofof cause of frombeingaction based vexed reliefs,respect
defendant ifreliefs. first ofrelinquished.
buthe I , time heto his
mention the essentialorma(Sudarshan
y compelrelief 1981BLJ679.])been may 1984 for
1981
pecuniary the any Rule sue more A the
according action.
(i) As This Order and but A shall claim. Set-off(h) whole be It BLJ stated be
Punj
The of entitled
claims a
the
the ontwice he of It one plaintiff in
of goes hiplaintiff
against
m granted, relief.
ILRvalue
Valuation,-The action court then 2 he respect
not the
plaint
available
ingredient 236]
plaintiff A
matter plaintiff the must rule shall except
omits, the lays II, cause (2) is According exact such Singh not as 128.)
jurisdiction. for afterwards without particular may
suit same
for toestablish is same down Rule provides in under may but to required even Thus Multipurpose
Bom t1he ofto which
on
more thbased
e hot respect of of, or
reliefs.
and to v. do PIFADING,
the has which
ofhis cause oramount
to substance ththee ofMohan not also
must 543.] was
cause afterwards 2(3) action. have a
subject-matter e fact than
thomission same that no relinquished plaintif. saying
the so, though
equitable
special to a intentionally Order granting while soabandon by
distinctly The
be plaintiff
valuation the the entitled (i)
on with
relates
of "A
obligation
ofcheck many sue
plaint.In
defendant
[Thakur as rule. DRAFTING
ofcause. the
one action the lt which that Lal, to Cooperative
valued
valuation suit action, that
rule
principle
the person 18 in I , ground
rules filedrelief sue rest not for causes Rule AA 1988 affect a[Kashi relief
and claiming
to the To leave may to respeCt has
hasreguires
is splitting
torelinquishes notplaintiff Ram part or AND
arnd of offor in the themore latter
(ii) raise
for omission
entitled permitted of sue claim. a defendants, on
entitled of (2),
2
been the civil Srin. the
of under
CONVEYANCING
the been
a any of the Sahai Chowdhary
arately court
purposes has suit second that that sue in
action of his whic hSociety
every plaintiff than th e set-off relief, may reliefcourt's
LJ
suit.
nothing filed. suit the relief
the for claim respect up the C.P.C. Themerely suit
Order
is to in to to Sinha claim relief
fees, court, all to of any choose
the 13 v.
[Kulu required make suit suit regard and plea
one defendant more sue at
portion plaintiff different by
of so or in sue any of a portionwhere or pecuniary (GJ and State
without court the v. or v.isVII,
give pecuinary but to to for relief, the omitted." toany a particular relinquished form &
on than forlatter partclaim alpOint
l f the
relief
Bhiwanj do include in relief former
to sue a
to
plaintiff Mst. Mujataba soughtRule of
in according this of one of so is claim kinds
with for respect leave and that should ofthem., plaintiff must jurisdiction, courtgiveupOr
of Bihar,
for such one of
required the Bimla or
his the so count, ofsuit, arising
that omittod
his any of has 7,
consider Hasan,
plaint jurisdiction
V the
purpo ol
the obtained (iii)cause
omitted.
wnole
suit
not
such
all relief
reliefs; several claim Order omits Out
plaint. relief the
one
is cannot
Devi
CPC.
not AIR,
ca that were the be out of to
of in
the i

to claims payableCourt-Fees
cause as fixed determines
declaration
court-fees waluation
though
court relief of valuation in statement
i.e. different of court, valuations
their required to is the to a
Vaman hadWhich
court-tee, tee be by been connection byAct Schedules4improperly
149
be above do plaint.
written which
adjurisdiction Orderascertain Valuation suit In
and Under and ofcourt-fee
whom
of th e
where of The , to valorem
soclaimed or on suits both of
paid, character fixed in action on need
by rule, correctthe Clause court-fee
for of also ofeach. Act, without the his
such such law 28 the
provisions upon character, VII,whether reliefs, several may
Mahadeo been to bythe Order the the
of
all for
the court-fee such th e for the ofand stamped
the plaint is andvaluefurther, where has bepecuniary claim
fee the Code the where under-valued the e.g.
purposes Rule athe should But
which be
paid whole they and courtpaper (b) is claimclaims th e given, a
suit is feecourt the Court Act. VII, in where bonds, been
Lotlikar, payable of Court,
of
valuation
shall ofcharged though of of 1 the valuation consequential
a stated for
is time must document prohibit th e Rule suits for be claim
in
is payable, may, or Civil
But Section insufficiently to the court-fees. the (i) suit for
the
paid jurisdiction
but a the ORIGINAL
the and supply be of determining or the
separately fixed PETITION
to Fees fails relief the in
being any be the above fo
11, under
r the
subject-matter
the in requires isreliefs. same embraces on
valuation it purposes
firstshall on in Procedure, rejected. within and may
AIR be construed
part Act provisions a 4 toclaimed recovery
C.P.C. court-fees most within
purpose of the court-fee one
such to in its the relief,
reiected mentioned
court of
do the rule The thcause
e of
1989instance.havediscretion pay force ofand he stamped,
trequisite a cases that the the given, plaint. beparagraph. the of
so, Similarly, plaintiff,
time clearlyCourt-Fees
there of of several
of
payment, any from tw o suit mentioned no
Bom the the Section and 1908 Court-Fees of the properly
is
money,
is jurisdiction
thforum
pecuniary
e
ofclaim is court
court.
in relating to they of action as value
In whole fee Order
fling, are required valuations the According payable
is distinct
same be lays
toto.
17] case prescribed
interpreted
at
are in plaint and
stamp-paper
according on may plaint
of
court-fee
the in Valuation fees
the any fixedprovisions suit givesrespect and for
force to
11 VII, the
th e beingdownproperty Act, appeal. and
Chandrakant document or very recording Act shall valued in jurisdiction aggregate
of of be for
must is causes th e e.g.
stage the by on
those rise is written to of
default and part the RuleFirst plaintiff, required the are required
are that the of in of
court-fees for alongwith
pertinent be to the th e Section purposes jurisdiction
within but for etc. contain separately to each of
effect
allow
as Suits 11
mandatory clausecourt, where valuationcompletely casessame.purposes suit the
of inthe any and or rejected. the rejection of several of action, that
and on so such
payment respect the Valuation receiving by the as the 17, for suit 103
Lotlikar document
as case has Sections Section aplaint (c) fails the the only The a of
inSecond timebeing a
if person this of
such may not in
r. of ot
 104
Plaintiff's
valuation v. court
within v. the to
concerned, courtwhen must
value
therebyCharan, tofollowcase,Mudaliar, value
Fees accepted
a[Rupchand
subject ofthe Ahmed
case suits Clause Raghavachariar, trial by of The
put jurisdiction Thevaluesthehe the to the any be
by Act the taken
for
obtain a the falls matter of
for otherwise prayed;obtain is enforce
it property
instance, suits
"In Bin, time
make
Appellate in
no question objection
the higher virtue
79 should a as
Court-Fees appeal.
In which
of (iv) the first
AIR Khan purpopses is
Invalue
d under claim, a all () (e) (d) joint-family(c) (b) (a)
of AIRgiven, objection up at
purposes of criterion a firstinstance the
an
valuation Cas for the
of 1949
the Chand
not
of such the
for fordeclaratoty
for for t he
towherein for Section 1956
th e
20 Court regarding of PLEADING,
a reliefprovided court.jurisdiction
djudication Section Mad be upon court,sought."
Act,reliefsuits easements-for
account-for an
enforce themovable
a right correctit
MLJ can earliest
982.]
purposes section,
suit of of declaratory the Hyd is
only at
of v. injunction-to property; to case 7 open be the DRAFTING
ourt-fee. As or whichrevenuea butbeing
448.]resorted
fBalwant the
sought
subject-matter a of
49.)
valuation,
726. ] Where th e
on
jurisdictional 8 matter for) decree shareright property of the Limbaji to taken earliest
to whenopportunity.
th e a the ofAn it plaintiff
a to documents Court the If isunder AND
from matter of to the simply and fiscal is no
court-fee.value
plaint exception,the
Narayan, of
accounts
valued arise a decree in to th e cOurt in there raised,
(K. a for or court objection stage -yaluation the or
CONVEYANCING
Suits jurisdiction obviously
fact,enactment, rightobtain order, anyshare of Fees 11
superior
Ojha of the lays shall out market-value-for movableno
plaintiff
th
the
e byhas that It
for fact, for in propertyrelating has to it is
Valuation purposes. such according to and in Act above and
purp0ses however, purposes ILR down state the of anwhere reject
plaintiff taken is been should clear
v. Rajabola
purDOses joint-family
property--to no on
Jagranicourt the such
as land;someconsequential lays should
plaint injuncton;
plaintiff 11ofthecertain has the market-value,
on to the being prejudice it.
[Palammal Bom valuation
th e consequential
benefit
and down policy
be
and of ofAct. must of nothing amount to
th e title: (Raghavachariar does
Desai actual which at or plaint. over-valuation be
raised
Kaur, jurisdiction valuation
court rules
the asked courtthe in
jurisdiction to is for be 591.) memorandum ground as given of
(not not caused law
amount follomo
ILR put not v. made in v. The amount cannot befor to relief-to
as
by effect in
Radnte depends. do herein the
entitlea
a such Rathna Court of value with relief that for
ne
46
lowe 1s when the at
Al and o a
oi

AIR same
CLJpurposes
94.34
] Section
the ofthe A19.1
enactment
the 881.] a and to th e
A Wrong.
allows Theunless successful,
encouragement or It
common be limited the 1992 In as
subject-matter
right The
Parues C plaint. is prayers means plaint.
For on of shouldunlimited
payment court7
Petition (add (add the Butconsidered. unlimited Sujir the of of
I. The or it the (3) defendant
(2) (1) SC construction the valuation are
hereto That description description plaintiff
isThe ifshould jurisdiction)
be
but Where 1526) Keshey jurisdiction
valuation
does it inact a of purposes this of
petitioner under partiesillegal,court evasion.
jurisdiction
taken Court two
IN or
cannot the partyto
jurisdiction court-fee
does in of
under not beThe has the different the of
referred MODEL and plaint
favour. attempt those the Naick of
Act, THE forbid.
as
for F'e es a
and may has
palpably can so of not Supreme
a should the suit suit
an Section and
states: plaintiff be construed
provision
Nanhe valuing correct; onthe shouldquestion
1996 residence) COURT
Petition no successfully preclude cases right v. the Act ORIGINAL
PETITION
agreement
their residence) avail Deokali into an from itself latter things. for for
PETITIONS FORM OF (P. right touched valuation decide Sujir
court-fee. in and
for 12 1Urumaabsurd,
FORMNo.themselves only evasion a Lal to Court
of purposes purposes
dispute declaratory of a
examining claimed where the Section
section
under to
Koer as suit, th e raise Ganesh
court-fee Where
the
removal of versus
OF........AT.NOOH.... interfere who but evade v.not Court a has cases
of the manifestly v. Joginder
of
Court it asthe
preliminary objection (Sailendra of of
reference can v. in is there 8
arising the to
is the even disclosed Nayak,
laid
is mentioned determining
Section Mohideen,
Arbitration of Kedar shape. the thefurnish the suit that of court-fees
of any in put Court Fees th e down t he is
the the devicecourt-fee, Chandra, valuation inplaint linked the any
outArbitrator. illogical Nath, Where plaint is and [(1992) v. Suits
to 12 camouflage suits byissue; Ramesh
valuation Fees Act, as valuation
of...
arbitration, 110 valuation
chance
a
orthe
filed
the with therein, conflict the and
and ILR does alone memorandum filed
follows: 1 Valuation
Ind or the Act he AIR being on in court
plaintiff jurisdiction SCC jurisdiction valuation
arithmetically 39 averments Chandra,
the RespondentPetitioner
Conciliation Cas that of not
ofCalevasion must..
by 1924 of that
a
in court befobetween
r
dated...he the courts (with 731
arbitration 752.] the his casting escape fiscal
on
the the Act, of 106
plaint suit, 704.1 merit It Cal has of :
law is is
 106
about
OIl.......e.*..
is ofthe appointed
arbitration.
of...of.....a.by
ppointed
Date. diiference
Place.
therein. are Dated.. thmisconduct.
referred.Section
e about evidence
respondentof
(2) (1) C In Place... rent not arbitratorunderthe
That Thatthe 4. said 3. 2.
Petition (add the correct
Verification,-It arbitration 5. 4
The GE Rs.....fromlower proceeding That That of..
2. 1. 1890,for (add (add That
12 months arbitrators,
descriptionmatter IN
and
inthe
the
That
That petitioner
description) Petition of on the
THE to it the
than arbitrator
description
description the
under of my agreement is has have
arbitrator
with said
arbitratorsrespondent
has differences ..as
P A absence reference
on........... PLEADING,
diedappointment
Guardianship
Case
COURT
A, Arbitration a standard rentthe the
abovementioned and knowledge fit taken passed by
statesSection a under is the the an
minor case
.whomatter the
.........a.t.. and and
and residence) verified refuses commenced
OF. shall respondent. of reference ofarbitrator
entered on.. DRAFTING
petitioner
was as Guardians in flat the since
residence)
residence) FORMNo. 2 andwhich opinion
under 10 andAdvocate cease was
residing of that petitioner on to Or he AND
of Versus Conciliation since....... on
a further and
has rent hear nor referred under and
is : the
guadian AT...KAITHAL......
JUDGE
No.....of..
belief. the Sd to the The entered having the on.......a.nd CONVEYANCING
the and have court from has the
at....... Guardians contents arbitrator the reference
Nothing proceedings the
son Wards submitted made
ontaken by
arisen said
effect should
Act, petitioner
the
the them provisions
of of
stated respondent arbitrators to...
P the 1996 issum a his no
and
Act, has with remove borrowed reference. to on. on....
who guilty tobut proceedings
award
said
Respondents been in the . of
Wards Petitioner 1890 respect and him of
was.....(add paras appointed
minor Petitioner order him of at has arbitration
..between the
Petitioner concealed althet
Sd judicial by
a taken
Act, Sd no. tounder said
rate th and
1-5 the that of

10. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3.
12. 9.
11.
That guardian
Shri... said Shri. That has That and That
That That approximately........y That That
as

That
person habits year, has.. theThat appointed
in minor,
the Shri.
deteriorate
purpose. repair,
a
person Thatbrought That
development it toThe sum been no(iii) (ii)
(i) the the (iii) properties,
is
take goodnearest law Shri.........died (ii) (i) the the A
apprehended mortgagees
the items and L but
it of and circumstances, and and the
which to guardian
ofappointed ......... other said said saidA is
be is proceedings about of
.children the
present
up in Nos. person th e a
ppointed in unlessproperty good a male
said relations A
given is is
A minor,
the of is
value, proper person....of.. ..(add (add . is
(i) of dd
good not
environment of
that.............should
Rs... character relation proposed minorth e
.of.......elder
appointment on..........at.......... either the governed entitledresiding ORIGINAL
PETITION
interest and and address, below-
items and they of ..of.. address,
address, having
character.
conducive
as trealise
he
to
(i)
person
the having resides
and
..was Or person of ars e
by
guardian (i) Or itare
and of as is property the
by in with. of
of property is of said Will
description age. been
and in at parareputation to an guardian, the is appointed
description
description saidHindu
or
his
the in their with subject. brother ....
to
which (ii) theonce minor. be income said invalid propertyof
minor own
of
minor will at appointed 5 his a.s of the born
the his security; of interest once above the the Law. right
repaired, minor, is and said and and and now .who
that proper the not para family
of guardian of said by on.....He
person be and a of
realise
said are about
land-owner. effectno of the relationships)Pthe t0 is
and 5expended of guardian of is minor, Will relationships)
relationships) living
a at.......He or several related
above the will in good married
and education
fit minor said bysaid
its in minor
bad Rs. of of are
and the but court.
operties fullthreaten
such seriouslystate business minor P minor assets to is
is for of He under :
proper beingvalue. case said the as him now
this that the ..a and 107
and of is is
 108
therein. 1-12 Dated.
Place.
Petition Date. Place.
13.
The of Verification,It
are
1, minor.
It the of
the IN (iv) (iii) (i)
That
petitioner correct behalf.
thisinand (viii) (vii) (vi) (v) (ii) is
of THE the
Guardians thread-wearing that said that accepted
the maintenance
of that fixedthat
appointed
minor;
said therefore
any said Rs. saidceremony;
a balance that
the C deducted) thatabove;Rs.........y
properties that
the said
(add COURT to said the
guardian a security PLEADING,
Original
Petition
No.. such sum the sums the a
my ......... rents sum
minorstates the of said at.......and
sum as L
guardian
description knowledge is other for said said minor the prayed
or
In outcosts and th e sureties
and OF verified mentioned
payment guardian
per guardian of as ofand of to some
guardian
DRAFTING
has as the of cent the
guardian net the Rs...... Rs... be
DISTRICTFORMNo. 3 direction of mortgage to education his that
under the this given
attained Wards of
matter Advocate
per
income
costs immovable
remuneration
expend of other AND
and that income
of may the Shri.
t:he and petition in may by of
Sd as annum of may
the fitCONVEYANCING
the ...a
Act, of belief. the of the of be of .asaid the
said JUDGE para the month month
the residence) items be
A the of mortgage the the
be properties at L: person and
...and
1890, minor contents
court th e may as application at minor, sum
liberty
appointed
age Minor of..
Nothing 5
liberty inminor:
said beinterestabove (i) at proper
respect may may
i.......had
....year8. for AT maydirected liberty of and
FARIDABAD stated minor;mentioned and
to
after out ofShri..........nay
be
removal under has Rs. the beguardianproperty person
deem and at(ii)raisein... of allowedof
payment to fixed
been the
minor; the
in to tothe of
Section fit the invest ....i.n
income collection
Petitioner Petitioner be apply in
may may
for
of concealedparas be paid para rate the sum to of
Sd Sdgiven of
E the the be be the be
the said the any his
of
39 no. ( or 10 of of

therein. are Place....

Date.Place.
C, A, Dated...
Petition D B, correct 4. 3. 2.
Verification,It 7. Thatthe 6. The 5.
The That at.Thatminor
on....been
(add (add the omissions,ThatminorThat atmosphere.
acquiring
2. 1. may of It
IN
That petitioner
and That the is
descriptiondescription
of to saidpetitioner (iii) (ii) the isthe the appointed the
THE prayed (ii) ()
be
my guardian
property AB, said not bad said minor
as minor
the appointed minor
the following
personsare
COURT knowledge .......a.dd He
thelooking
respondentstates now
petitioner No....of.
Original
Petition is that
....add is guardian habits minor guardian
is
and and verified of
: has
of related case in.... is ORIGINAL
studying PETITION
Wards major
and the the constantly
the as In OF in attained
after in
residence) residence) FORMNo. 4
address
description)addressand is
re, Advocate place.his said said may has the of
has
petitioner under DISTRICT and that to Or
was her not th e
under versuS A,
attained belief. the
guardian
Sdminor the be,been company
goingbeing
B, and property. puberty person
appointed Act, : fit minor namely:
minor contents description) guilty
Section and to down
on.......in JUDGE Nothing brought
1890 be be and of....... and
the another as
removed of .class
in....
age a appointed under the in property
41 stated the
guardian AT his
ofcase has following up
of suitable guardiantheof
21
PALWAL
from : studies
N0...of.
the been in in
of
years Petitioner paras guardian of
Respondent Applicant congenial th e
of
Guardians Applicant guardian the
concealed acts and .school
the no. Sd said
on. Sd office 109
or is
person 1-6
 In 110
Petition Date. therein.
Place... are Dated.Place.
Application re,
6. 5. That 4. 3. Shri........0f
2.
That 1.
The correct
Verification,-It the....
That 7. 3
Estate 6. 5. 4.
Thatexecuted.
That by
kept property That testament
the tìmeaccepted of.......(add
same Thatpetitioner on the.property
on That by
him shallThat from...property That books That
C.
the to the D the
the the athe said
draft ofthe was
of..
my and the by on the the the
correct Shri........a.fo probate under IN said court) of
partition
petitioner saidtestatorat testatorat.........0on.....n in takingthe
was said by
drafted aforesaid Probate THE knowledge that respondent
hi s respondent respondent belonging
(when account, respondentPLEADING,
the description is account. Bank said to
Will theof lost
copyShri....having Section
of verified thepossession
account,
guardian. such th e
is of said Petition
COURT
latter be
the
to DRAFTING
was was of orthe
by................
not resaid statescopy FORMNo. 5 be date be title has
the Will be last the
the said looted Shri..... andAdvocate
that heretofore directed account,
named duly time forthcoming. country or
237 and cease directed orderedaccounts directed
of deeds, not
said duly as No.....ofOF.AT beliet. the Sd
or
this
petitioner. AND
and th e draft of
residence) control delivered
executed. under to to
as
prepared
the Will was
said died
.testator. died Indian
on....... contents allow
be
to petition. pay to Jewellery toCONVEYANCING
the all executed
presence Nothing have
maintained were
an and his of
AMBALA belonging deliver tound submit
render and
said
during lost 2017 to
executor the any the
this documents Succession stated scrutinized
to the
will petitioner to and
terms ofhis Will has authority the
by.........f.... original
copy disturbances witnesses .at.. by tothe have petition
in dated... last Petitioner been in the th e petitioner other
the was whereof Deceased paras petitioner been
last and Act Petitioner Petitioner
said to
petitioner
to accounts
and
er
said after Will concealed operate operate passed mt
initialled movable for Sd no, Sd du
Will at were Shri what
will. ..Was *no the and 1-5 u
of the

A Date..........Dated.......*.**.
therein. are
Place.
C Place....
Petition (add (add
The correct
Verification,-It
10. 8. 7.
9.
4. 3. 2. 1.
description
description the directed
petitioner.
probate
Shri....o.f..
produced by Shri. Ithas That That
petitionerThat
within
That:granting That That
dated.....duly
respondent
detailspetition. executed. That
petitioner
under to is, been
Original THE IN my the the to (ii) (i)
(iii) (ii) (i) the Shri......of....died
this the therefore,
ofunder .dated.
the .................

revocation made the following amount assets

the aforesaidSection and and In
knowledge the jurisdiction
respondent court said is best
on........... residence)
residence) Probate
OF......AT
COURT
re, verified copy Section to
probate which
Shri......left Estate any of to ORIGINAL
PETITION
FORM No. 6 prayed properties
granted states of263 .initialled
of the about
Petition andAdvocate
that other of are
Between the
was the ofof...d.eceased 267 belief this
(No........of.....) and Rs..likely
certified-to-be-true belief. the Sd said .who thatcourt
on.... grantas the of
probate court of
guilty under No. contents
by of
Indian Will has
Indian the to
Nothing the the for the
a at. of FATEHABAD : come
the a said
of of last probate : (now testator application
petitioner
probate
copy no
.of. stated Succession
possession
the the
Succession Petitioner
testator to
Respondent has lost)
Will of the
following is
copy said as of
been in be
annexed testamentand paras aforesaid, the the hands
thereof, Act are
of
Will Petitioner
Petitioner concealed granted said
Act Will
acts, the Sd no. Sd to situate of
for Will.
to to 1-9 and the
to be be of
111
order
give the the
 112
therein. are
Date.Place. Dated.
Petition Place...
The correct is
Verification,-It 7. 5.
4. 3. 2. 1. (2) (1) 6.
That the That accordingly
theto has That
inhas case)....
testament.
That That herewith.
That That
petitioner
certificate for CA
(add (add to
(iv) (iii) (ii) (i)
point suggestions
Probate court.
into Chapter
that accountpreparing
that respondent
testator that on . the it (ii) estate() the obtained on
the
the Shri....of....ied
the IN my is, the
description grant of PLEADING,
description THE the the possession therefore, petitioner
value said states case In
No.......
Probate knowledge of law (o r grant
by....Municipal writing
Committeeissued of the by
under
re,
HIGH verified
probate respondent
VII the an be of to by
of Wil the ofinventory directed the said justifymeans fraudulently
the wasannexed,
as
and FORM Partestate .....y prayed is obtained theDRAFTING
concealing
of
follows: and estateCOURT andAdvocate of probate
of
Section that interested the of Or probate
deceased
residence) th e DX to
assets duly Act residence) oforbe
directed the untrue AND
on........... of.....deceased No. 7 belief. the Sd Wil ofthe thereof; be this that
the handed in grant. theCONVEYANCING
executed
dated....is
which 276 OF.....T.. contents said properties case for facts of
be
Indian court the in
allegations th e
Nothing reasons the
of delivereddeceased
at.......A exhibittoNo............of
over
are the be following from said
and stated Succession due
likely revoked
to of
Indian has the th e the
by Wil
duly his copy by in administration of
Petitioners been in accordance an a making
false
court the
to the petitioner said fact
last paras or
witnessed.
come
tisne
of
SuccessiOn Petitioner Petitioner respondent Act:
concealed
inventory
annulled, .......to
the
essential
respondent
material
deceased
to
Wil Sd. no. Sd :
after
filed wd 1-6 with of
the and

Haryana
Narnaul, rloHari PreetKamini, Place.........*****.
do IN Date.........e**...
petition (or that and Date. Place...belief.
and
declare Place....
Dated.
Petition that
House
2. 1.
"The Lal, Vihar, Shri THE Verification.-I,
testamentI Verification,-I,
8. 7.
tothe
was that 6. 5.
ThatHindu That
petitioner wlo petitioners. the India.
throughout It estate That
probateSchedule jurisdiction That
the petitioner'sThat
s/o Keshri, COURT be
for No. Narnaul, Shri present
said what is
the Sohan his jurisdiction
beforeVedic Restitution 13, of prayed
of
no the the
r/
Harilalo testator
last the is of
petitioner most the Himmat OF and application
the the of petitioners
Lal, House PetitionNo.Restitution
MATRIMONIAL
PLEADINGS stated propertiesof hands
rules Haryana (Section Will testator E, A that the
THE saw this
and Hindu acknowledged one aforesaid, aforesaid. said
respectfully and said
and and Colony,
of No. DISTRICT
and
the
therein probate of.....High High 13
ORIGINAL
PETITION
after 9 FORMNo. 8 of Petitioner) (for
the Will has Ks............ are
Conjugal 2, testament mentioned Advocate Sd- property of
ceremonies
respondent Marriage Versus of of said the
H.M. isthe or
been Court thnamed
e
the Conjugal witnesses of for
states testator true ..deceased
the
the
JUDGE Act, petitioner Lettersmade is testator as
marriage, Rights
Act, 2017 of in
writing in to said annexedCourt executors
were
on as Rights myaffix the the well
1955) to to
under 1955. AT Willintended of
1-1-2007
married Respondent presence). above th e best in any asare
under Petitioner annexed hi s Administration and...igh
herewith. in
the MAHENDERGARH the may in
situate
:i aforesaid of other the
signature
petition, territories
petitionerlawtully at
Section my
above to
Witness be said
Narnaul. to Petitionerinformation have Court
Sd the Petitioner granted within
last Sd Will.
theretodeclare petition, Sd
as 9 above effect of for Court. within
and of will the the
per to 113
a
 114
Place...
Date.
Place... therein. also are
Date..
IN true true
Verification,-I 11. 10. 9. 8. 7.
6. 5. 4. 3.
That That the Court That this That That witht eaddress
petitioner. That That
.....

for
THE
as to (b) (a) petition The
The therefore the jurisdiction at excuse. respondent
COURT per
the
pendente Thedecree
petitioner. live The petitionerKurukshetra
exercise petitioner, ordinary partiesthe petitioner the theremarriage in there more the there ofboth
(Section best for
advicemyof Hon'ble Hon'
with ble it cause India hasrespondent than PLEADING,
isthe have both
may the of has
Petition of do has
OFJ0 lite ofthe
therefore, has original regarding
this between
beenbefore been two
one
Respondent.
hereby
my Court purposes jurisdiction which is of arDRAFTING
e
THE of
Court
atpassed
be
her
petitioner aftixed were
Courtaction
cohabited
daughter Hindu
knowledge the conjugal may nothis the no years has
Hindu for
FORMNo. 9
verify may matrimonial married this proceedings
DISTRICT Judicial Advocate. rate prays ofthe situated accrued and collusion withdrawn AND
with be petitioner
petition. without Cammy of and and
Marriage that
be
of rightspleased andjurisdiction
requisite try
to thpetition.
e CONVEYANCING
and pleased that as livedare
Separat:.on Rs. costs. to jurisdiction respondent.
petition betweenthe
the and within well to the domicile
JUDGE Nothing
been
has
belief. respondentand
the of any
1000 withallow to : the
12under
Act, contents to Court
entertain
and the as any society
reasonable
grant
direct is
p.m. the the petitioner
last years
Remaining
parasare territorial filed kind of
GURGAON1955)
AT Court-fees fee of of
one
petitioner the Haryana.
of respondent.
tine
in this thisresided respectofin the oi roof
favour respondent stamn without
Petitioner parasPetitioner maintenance within
cause
petitioner
age
Sd petition.Court
limits
together any in
living
at
Sdconcealed delay. the
no. of a and and
The free and the
1-1 the to of

Sir, Sector XY. Sector Roshan A..

Date.Place.
The
Petition
...
ication,-I 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. 13, 15, Lal,
9. 8. 7. s/o wlo
Thatharmfulpetitioner
apprehension That That after
and therefore That That
Gurgaon. Petitioner
That
on
The Court
fo r That
therefore,
entertain
petition. this petitioner is Thatdelay.
improper petition.
respondent. Gurgaon, Gurgaon,
(b) (a) 1-1-2006 for Shri r/oShri
the situated there treated the thethere the both the House
respondent
pendente The petitioner,
separation The Judicial
petitioner. fees the the
respondent marriage
Y. B,
Hon'ble purpose The respondent
or of itmarriage the respectfully Haryana Haryana d/o
Hon'ble notional this and said is is is according
stamp comnmitting her one No.10,Petition
Shri
do within
the
petition injurious
no in not Petitioner rlo
lite Hon' b le Marriage 1955
SeparationAct,
hereby therefore, of marTiage collusion the with feasible son and between House ORIGINAL
PETITION
Courtalong Court in
of respondent is
at jurisdiction value mischievouslytreating of submits no.........
favour the the is mind such to Versus
the with for also and No.
verify may may Court being with adultery, 2 Hindu
Petitioner
rate prays fixed ofordinary was toyears
Respondent
Gurgaon.
domicileof 60,
be of be
costs. the
the crueltyof live the as under of
have filed the the Vedic under
that pleased of pleased
the that petition and
amount has
solemnised living 2017
petitioner abused petitioner
Rs. respondent and with and Section
the Court gotlocal been without petitioner as
1,000 petitioner : the with Respondent rites
:
to maliciouslyto are
contents to has
jurisdiction residing her
pass fees. is limits causerespondent. with and
p.m.grant been Rs. at..... any
in
to
in
theHindus, 10
that Respondent of Petitioner
the and a
decree presenting
unnecessary
of
live different petitioner.
a cruelty
severe ceremonies
of in affixed at....... charged Hindu
Petitioner reasonable before took
paras maintenancefavour against tothis with it
of andthe will place
Sd andthe try ways
judicial hereon Court,which the and 115
no. of this the be at
and or
1-7 the the
 Date.....Place.
(a)(a) amended
Sir, HUDA, rlLeel
HUDA, Vimr/o my, Rohtak
underSonepat,
Haryana o a
conceal
th erei
ed nparas. are 1 6
petition
filing of Before
At The
House House true
the 2. That 1. Petition Ram, are
Section dlo to
7. 6. 5. 4. 3. Marriage Marriage,
were/are
petition That Petitioner
at.......... up No. No. IN als o
There
respondent
consummated
marriage. the That time
s/o the
That petitioner.
marriageofofThat moremental
divorce.
petitioner That with
the Shri
20, Shri THE(Under
to for a 6, true best
the 13 Sector Raj,
the after date. Sector
Shiva, COURTsection
than the 1s
titioner
in and
one
Hindu Hindu
married
beforestatusmarriagewas most dissolution of being PLEADI of NG,
is Husband
Status (An my
view respondent
3 cohabited the Unmarried Hindu 2, Petition
3, Petition
Divorcefor
physical
years.
entitled boy respectfully
solemnisation followsasafñdavit,
the and OF13FORM advisededgeDRAFTING
knowl
of of of
has marriageplace Marriage Versus
DISTRICT
tothe cruelty
6 of No.. 1955)
Hindu
has vearstogether residencePlaceof No.10 by AND
not the duly marriage
myand
RohtakRohtak
circumstances of states
solemnised
of CONVEYANCING
in
dissolution and been out andattested Marriage
JUDGE
of residence Act, 2017 belief.
any Advocate.
as
ofmarriage as
alsoshe
treating at 1955 by
manner
ccessory
been thishusband unmarried
HinduHindu
married under
the Contents
is
between Act,
AT
Status Wife of (No. Nothing&
wedlock time filed decree ROHTAK
mentioned has the the the
Respondent
25
Petitioner
Petitioner
of
and and herewithi
of
parties Sd
desertpetitioner
ed who
petitioner filing partiesthe of of
remaining
has
residence Place of 1955)
divorce been
by
above 1s
wife SonepatSonepat of to
a him Yi this the as
or decre the
to for with
and

true are Place.

Place..
Date..... Date.
Sir, 10.
true
Verification.-I 13. 12. 11. 9. 8.
on 14.
The IN the That There
The Thatlimitsmarriage filingThat Thatconnived
granted.Thererespondent. any
8. 1. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. to petitionerpetition.
Divorce.
Respondent Petition THE manner
henceThat That falseThat That That
That That Written (Under basis my there the
That
denied. Written petitioner, the ofthe
has is of
COURT knowledge nothis at
th e th e the the the of properhusband the bynot has petition
the allegation
the the
Statement
under
Section legal do
andthe
or other
petition. condemned or
contents contents
contents contents Statement ordinary been not condoned
Petitionercontents
contentscontents respectfully on
Leela hereby therefore, Court ORIGINAL
PETITION
SectionPetition OF advice. and behalf any legal been is
respondent and
on THE 13FORMNo. 11
of of of of Ram belief.
verify original
fee wifeprevious not the the
of of the of of
Against ground any
is para para para para on 13 Nothing prays of of
para para DISTRICTHindu
no....... cruelty. acts
respondent. not para states behalf Versusof Rs. last any unnecessary presented
Rest that may civil
no. no, complained
no.
no. entitled no. no, no. Hindu
Petition
Marriage
that proceedings
parties. why
of has the resided
3 2 1 as paras dissolvedbejurisdiction
8 7 5 of4 of of of ofVimmy 2017 the the in
of of are under Marriage JUDGE contents
been has
the the th e the the or
the the to for are marriage relief collusion
the denied. petition Act, beentogether with improper off
petitionpetition petitionpetition petitionRespondent: Divorce concealed
also
AT of of and
decree Act, ROHTAK 1955) Petitioner believed Petitioner bya affixed this regard should
paras between has
These within with
are are are are are are 1955 delay
therein. Sd
decree of court. not
of
admitted.
Sd no. on to not
unnecessary
ecessary admitted.admitted. the
divorce. admitted. are to
1-12 the the the the be in in 117

totally be
 Date. concealed
therein. Place.. 118
steius
ber (ü (1)
marTAge
Before Place.. are Date.
OF
PETITION
petition
filing
tbe A: true
Verification.-I 10.
Most OF
Respectfully
showeth
DIVORCE 9.
3.bether (* the 2 1.
THE
N
THE to Therefore,hence That
kindly denied. denied.
hence
DaTage
i1 beforetherewith
marriage
petutin copy That
heThat filed is is to
(n time the
ny.the t filed Hindu COURT
this FOR the
a the of HINDU a best be
party herewith marriage Bø
paragraph were
the
ritesDISSOLUTION NO.......OF
PETITION2016 dismissed contentsit PLEADING.
ast status MUTUAL of do
Status relevant OF is
as MARRIAGE (DISTT.),
DELHI
NHMA my
hereby
resiced
arrage is and prayed
a PRINCIPAL ofDRAFTING
Hindu
1olows: and An was THE FORMNo.12 knowledge with
Husband paras
state Age ceremonies
extract verify
solemnizedCONSENT
marriageplaceafmdavit. that
together ANDMATTER costs.
ogether 9-13 AND
br Residence Place of ACT, PETITIONER
OFNO. 2 N0. 1
PETITIONER the
the of from and that CONVEYANCING
reigon JUDGE, of
residence duiy MARRIAGE petition
andplace and on.
betweer 1955
UNDER OF belief the the
wh the
the at attested contents petition
where or Hindu .......
.a.t. (NO.
|eir the FAMILY and of
names n0t Status
Age of the SECTION the
is time the stating 25 BY nothing of are
sex. the Marriage
Registerparties petitioner
as TO Petitioner
paras
of Wife parties A COURTPetitioner unnecessary
dstes parties part of DECREE Sd has Sd
the thesecertifed A 1955)
fling according 13-B(1) no.
children, oi ResidencePlaceof to been may
of to facts 1-9
his
birh the the
the or

believed
Verifiedat. paras. 1 marriage
consent.
mutual to
respectfully
Bimla
Smt. 2. 1. Dated.
ro
Robtak Kumar. 1HUDA,House Shri
RamHaryana
Rohtak, to........o.f grant
BEFORE In Thatth10.e 7. 6. 5. 4.
The 9. 8.
House KantiDheeraj. Note.-An view That theThat
proceedings.
instituting That or That since.That ages).or
That
marriage
influence.
undue
No. to above between thisgranted.
a entertain
Owner be decree and
of the the the
No. 2,
Lal, THE the there there the
Sector true named humbly the
petitioner of petitioners petition mutualshouldparties parties
and 10, both afidavits ..are
..Place) petition
MIOTOR by above is has .and
Prem slo divorce
Drirer Bhim.
Shris'o No. Widow of
resident himher.petitioner
true petition. no not beto
Petition
late no.Petition
MAC.I.
Before prayed consent
is have to ORIGINAL
PETITION
iacts other the
Colony, 2, are No. been not dissolved.
not the
of VERIFICATION
to
ACCIDENT
Shri FORMNo.13 onPRAYER submit petition
f petitioners the true 1 that and legal presented
a of states mutual any has petition
been
Kanti and
Versus petitioner's circumstances,this that ground
unnecessary not
to Petitioner have able
Lal CLAIM is the on consent
Hon'ble this in been have
solemn mutually to
2017 of to petitioner's Court why collusion. obtained live
be been
information NO. Court
thereby or
TRIBUAL
ROHTAR
appended). affrmation it relief together
PETITIONER
PETITIONER NO. 2 improper
Peaioners PETITIONER
PETITIONERNO. 2NO. 1 2 is, has agreed living
on by
may mostjurisdiction
therefore, should
knowledge dissolving
the force, since
reoeived be separateiy
and
that round of delay
pleased not fraud theirthen.
NO. 1 119
paras the to be in
and and
 Name12.
11. 10.
attended
oner/Officer
Medicalwho 9. 8. 7.
startinginvolved 6.Nameand 5. 4. 3. 2. respect 1.
Nature give
travelling whom
registered. was StationName Place,
Wasaccident compensation s/o HR-12-9999)
2.carno 120
evidence.amount Does
Supported paywhom Monthly dead. Occupation
employer Age Full Name
person
dead. Shri We, Oriental
the the income of
and addres8 of
on and ofcompensation
journey in took in date compen
the
th e and thRohtash the
injuries name byperson of e
the the whose
address and person income of Insurance
by tax? of
person Father's for heirs
of injury,
addresstheof the income the
dead and place
accident, time sation the
addresstheof the who
sustained. ofMotor jurisdiction
in in person
If
of
the and PLEADING,
destination. or of
documentary s0, person dead. person Vehicledeath
person. places is
respect of tax is the name Co.,
the
the accident. respect diedlegal
claimed state
Vehicle claimed,
if Police
case the
to persondead. dead ofetc. of in
Rohtak... DRAFTING
ofs0, the dead. representatives
of be the Shri
of accident,
are
st-mortem
Government
2/2017)
P.M.R.No. Dr.
injury) in
Fatal Nounder No. City
Rohtak
stand,bus approximately
Approximately tax Income
Rs.25,000
month
per Business
applicable
Not years
Shopkeeper) (A 54House KantigivenKanti
Rohtak AND
ordinary Rohtash.death
10,00,000 SectionClaim
60,000Vehicles
PK. and 46 annually CONVEYANCING
Section Police hereby
Lal,below Lal.
No. of
respectively
Huda, sufficient of of Act, 166 for
course Tax the Shri (Rs.
Hospital,
on Station,
2017 (vide 2, Necessary
s/o
apply 1988 and
304-A, at Shri
Respondents
compen
sation
Rs. Sector late Kanti ten
7-7-2017Medical of to dated 3.30 Annexure paying
Payee, for Shri to140
279Rohtak, 20,000 Rohtash on the
Rohtak naturecause 2,particulars the Lal, lacs) of
of
p.m., Kanti account tune the
7-7-2017, H.U.D.A., grant s/o and
Officer, I.P.C. FIR. income
I)
(vide (headdeath near Motorofunder
did Lal, Shri Rs,
in of of Rs.

ace-Rohtak
-9-2017 24. 23. 22. 21. 20. 19. Nameand18. Has17. Name16.and 15. 14. Period13.
No.
condoned. disposal deceased.Relationship result. what
with with insurer vehicle. theof
vehicle
documentary thereon
evidence).
2, 2. 1. Causesubmission
description whichReasons be
Any Amount Title applicants Name
Registration expenditure
SectorDheeraj,
Smt. necessaryother
the of the any and
of of of
of involved (to
Bimla, or the the address of
n0. accident delay of information
the compensation owner/insurer,claim
2, s/o grounds or propriety
withaddress addresstheof number be if
vehicle.
isthe claim. in treatmnent
helpful any,
H.U.D.A.,widow Late
sought the been of supported
with
accident.
the &
claim
Shri for that deceased theof incurred ORIGINAL
of in of lodged
if owner type PETITION
Shri
late brief to
Haryana.
Rohtak, Kanti be
late the may the so of by &

Lal no.petition
Kanti
Petitioner
ofPetitioners
Rs. As No House
Oriental HR-12-9999
Ram Carno. Death
spoton
Lal the taken Thedeceased
handed Rohtak The in The
going intoxicated No representatives
No60,000
Kanti
bothLal the mentioned
a delay 10,00,000 2
same police on car rash Act,under is Kumar,
No.
Government
over Hospital,in
whereafter foot. Shri
respondent the no
Insurance
1988 10
day took hit and
and
are
1
to Section (Rs. of widow is in Prem s/o
He the was
Kanti
the the the negligent ten theheirs
legal
and the the Co., Shri
residents died Colony,
post-mortem
dead son,
petitioners.
Petitioners dead Lal, headdriving was
lacs)
166deceased. of title
on Rohtak Bhim,
Sd and and
petitioner
deceased
House of body body the whomanner. of Rohtak
of heavily
his
140 Rs. the rlo
was on and spot. was the
121
car
122
PLEADING, DRAFTING AND CONVEYANCING

Verification.-We, do hereby verify that the contents of paras No.

the best of our
1 to 24 of the claim petition are true and correct to
knowledge and belief. Nothing has been concealed therein.
Place-Rohtak Sd
Date-1-9-2017 Petitioners