Using A MEMS Microphone in A 2 Wire Microphone Circuit
Using A MEMS Microphone in A 2 Wire Microphone Circuit
AN-1181
INTRODUCTION
MEMS microphones are being used to replace electret condenser microphones (ECMs) in audio circuits. These two types of micro-
phones perform the same function, but the connection between the microphone and the rest of the system is different for ECMs and
MEMS microphones. This application note explains those differences and provides design details for a simple MEMS microphone based
replacement circuit.
VBIAS
RBIAS
1µF
OUTPUT
ECM
GROUND
An example of a common use of an ECM is as an in-line voice microphone in a headset connected to a phone. In this application, the
connector between the headset and the phone has four pins: left audio output, right audio output, the microphone signal, and ground.
The output signal and DC bias voltage of the ECM are carried on the same signal line in this design. The bias voltage source is
typically about 2.2 V.
A key advantage of using a MEMS microphone instead of an ECM is its improved power supply rejection (PSR). A MEMS microphone
typically has a PSR of at least −70 dBV, while an ECM has no power supply rejection because the bias voltage is connected to the
microphone directly through a resistor.
InvenSense Inc.
InvenSense reserves the right to change the detail 1745 Technology Drive, San Jose, CA 95110 U.S.A Document Number: AN-1181-00
specifications as may be required to permit improvements +1(408) 988–7339 Revision: 1.0
in the design of its products. www.invensense.com Release Date: 12/31/13
AN-1181
CIRCUIT CHANGES TO REPLACE AN ECM WITH A MEMS MICROPHONE
The basic challenge to using a MEMS microphone in a system originally designed around an ECM is that there are not separate signals
for power and the microphone output, such as with the headset microphone. A MEMS microphone can be used in a design like this if
some small changes are made to the circuit. First, the DC bias provided downstream in the signal chain must be isolated from the
output signal of the microphone. Second, this DC bias must be used to power the MEMS microphone without allowing the output signal
of the microphone to interfere with the power supply. The DC bias isolation can be provided with an AC-coupling capacitor and the
MEMS microphone power can be provided from a carefully-designed circuit that serves as a voltage divider and a low-pass filter. The
ADMP504 MEMS microphone is used as an example in the following design. A 2.2 kΩ bias resistor is used here.
R1
C2 VBIAS
VDD
2.2kΩ
ANALOG
MEMS C1 1µF
MICROPHONE MICROPHONE
OUTPUT OUTPUT SIGNAL
GND
GROUND
HEADSET
CONECTOR
Figure 2. MEMS Microphone with a Single Wire for Power and Output Signal
Figure 2 shows an example of a design that achieves this. In a headset design, the portion of the circuit to the left of the headset
connector would be in the actual headset, and the 2.2 kΩ bias resistor and 1 μF coupling capacitor would be in the source device,
such as a smartphone.
Resistors R1 and RBIAS form a voltage divider with the MEMS microphone to bring the VBIAS voltage down to the supply voltage at the VDD
pin. Depending on the values of VBIAS, RBIAS and the desired VDD voltage, Resistor R1 may need to be very small, as is seen in the example
below. The necessary series resistance (RBIAS + R1) can be calculated by modeling the microphone as a resistor through which a fixed
current is flowing. The typical supply current of the ADMP504 when VDD = 1.8 V is 180 μA. Using Ohm’s law with 1.8 V on VDD, this
microphone can be modeled as a 10 kΩ resistor. The voltage divider equation used to solve for the appropriate value for resistor R1 is:
[Microphone VDD] = [Bias voltage] × (10 kΩ/(10 kΩ + R1 + RBIAS)).
From this equation, it can be calculated that a 2.2 kΩ RBIAS resistor and a 499 Ω R1 resistor divide the voltage from the 2.2 V bias voltage to
the 1.73 V microphone VDD. There is a trade-off in choosing the value of R1; a higher value results in a lower VDD, but this larger value
may also be necessary to prevent C2 from being too large, as described below.
Two different models of this voltage divider are shown in Figure 3. On the left, the ADMP504 microphone is modeled as a 180 μA
current source, and on the right the microphone is modeled as a 10 kΩ resistor with a 1.8 V VDD.
VBIAS VBIAS
2.2V VDD 2.2V
R1 RBIAS R1 RBIAS
IMIC RMIC
180µA 10kΩ
Capacitor C1 AC-couples the microphone output so that its biased output is isolated from the microphone bias voltage supplied from the
phone. This capacitor also forms a high pass filter with RBIAS, R1, and the microphone’s equivalent resistance for a given VDD. The
total resistance to be considered in calculating the high-pass filter corner frequency is the series resistance of RMIC and R1 in parallel
with RBIAS. This resistance can be calculated by the equation RTOTAL = ((RMIC + R1) × RBIAS)/(RMIC + R1 + RBIAS).
For the example given here, RTOTAL = 1810 Ω. The high-pass filter corner frequency is given by
f−3 dB = 1/(2π(RTOTAL × C1)
For a filter corner at least an octave below the low-frequency roll-off of the ADMP504 at 100 Hz, C1 should be at least 1.8 μF.
Figure 4 shows a complete headset circuit using the ADMP504 MEMS microphone and appropriate resistor and capacitor values, based
on the given VBIAS and RBIAS values with which we’ve been working.
R1
1.8V 499Ω
C2
10µF
VDD
C1
ADMP504 1.8µF
OUTPUT AC SIGNAL + DC BIAS
GND
GROUND
CONCLUSION
The circuit described here allows a MEMS microphone to be used in a design where there are not separate signals available for
power and the microphone output. The circuit uses only two capacitors and one resistor to enable a MEMS microphone to be used
in a 2-wire microphone circuit.
This information furnished by InvenSense is believed to be accurate and reliable. However, no responsibility is assumed by
InvenSense for its use, or for any infringements of patents or other rights of third parties that may result from its use. Specifications
are subject to change without notice. InvenSense reserves the right to make changes to this product, including its circuits and
software, in order to improve its design and/or performance, without prior notice. InvenSense makes no warranties, neither
expressed nor implied, regarding the information and specifications contained in this document. InvenSense assumes no
responsibility for any claims or damages arising from information contained in this document, or from the use of products and
services detailed therein. This includes, but is not limited to, claims or damages based on the infringement of patents, copyrights,
mask work and/or other intellectual property rights.
Certain intellectual property owned by InvenSense and described in this document is patent protected. No license is granted by
implication or otherwise under any patent or patent rights of InvenSense. This publication supersedes and replACes all information
previously supplied. Trademarks that are registered trademarks are the property of their respective companies. InvenSense sensors
should not be used or sold in the development, storage, production or utilization of any conventional or mass-destructive weapons
or for any other weapons or life threatening applications, as well as in any other life critical applications such as medical equipment,
transportation, aerospACe and nuclear instruments, undersea equipment, power plant equipment, disaster prevention and crime
prevention equipment.
©2013 InvenSense, Inc. All rights reserved. InvenSense, MotionTracking, MotionProcessing, MotionProcessor, MotionFusion,
MotionApps, DMP, and the InvenSense logo are trademarks of InvenSense, Inc. Other company and product names may be
trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated.