BASIC COMPUTATION & PRINCIPLES OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING

LAB. (CS - 291)RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptable

Assigned Expectations Marks
Content 4 3 1
0

Capability of writing Most of algorithms Some of algorithms Few of algorithms No algorithms or

Algorithm/Drawing or procedures are or procedures are or procedures are procedures are
Flow Chart written clearly. written written clearly. written.
undoubtedly.
All programs are
Capability of writing written precisely Some programs are Major errors in Programs are not
based on the program writing. written/wrong
Program written accurately.
question. program written.

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output Finding of results found.
output not found. output found.
are clear.

Completion of target 100% target has 75% target has 50% target has 25% target has

in Lab been completed. been completed. been completed. been completed.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab

Fair Copy in proper
Attention to Lab Fair next day of lab., Very poor
time but not with Late Submission.
Copy with proper presentation.
proper
documentation.
documentation.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O
Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> E
Between 10 – 06 ----> A
Between 05 – 00 ----> B
Signature with Date
Experiment No. Experiment Date

Experiment Name

NETWORK LAB ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC FOR STUDENT

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Expectations Unacceptable
Assigned Marks
Content 4
3
1 0

Attended in proper Attended in proper Attended but came

Attendance in Lab on
the Day of Experiment time & day with time & day without very late and with / Absent.
without Rough
with Rough Copy Rough Copy. Rough Copy.
Copy.

All steps/programs Major

steps/programs
Experimental are completely
are completely Some major errors. Wrong attempt.
procedure correct and
correct and minor
accurate.
mistake.
Represent all data Represent some Represent some
appropriately. data appropriately. data appropriately. No result
Result Analysis Finding of results Finding of results Finding of results
analysis.
are clear. are clear. are unclear.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab

Submission of Lab Fair Proper Time i.e. in next day Lab but Fair Copy in proper Late Submission.
Copy next day Lab. without Index or time for missed
Chanel File. Lab Experiment.

Marking Page No., Page No(s). and Page No., Exp.

Exp. Date(s) are Date, Exp. No. are
Attention to Lab Copy Exp. Date, Exp. No. Only Page No(s). is missing in other not available on
properly in every / are missing. pages after first first Page of Lab
page. Page of Lab Report. Report and other
pages also.
Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> Z (5)

Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> Y (4)
Between 10 – 06 ----> X (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> W(0)
Signature of the Examiner with Date
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
DATA STRUCTURE & ALGORITHM LAB (ES-CS - 391)
NAME………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………
YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...
UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX
DATE OF
EXP. DATE OF GRADE TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. EXP. /Marks SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION
 RUBRIC FOR DATA STRUCTURE & ALGORITHM LAB.

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Outstanding Excellent Average Below Average

Assigned
Marks
Parameters 4 3 2 1

All the steps are Most of the steps Few steps are None of the
Capability of writing implemented are implemented implemented steps are
Algorithm/Procedure correctly of an correctly of an correctly of an implemented of
algorithm algorithm algorithm an algorithm
Completeness of Completeness of Completeness of
code, consistent
Capability of writing code, Inconsistent code, consistent Program not
variable naming
Program variable naming and variable naming completed
and well
well formatted and unformatted
formatted
Completion in target 100% target has 75% target has been 50% target has 25% target has

in Lab been completed

completed been completed been completed
Most of the Some of the outputs Few outputs have None of the
Output outputs are are correct and well been found outputs are
correct and well formatted. correctly correct
formatted.
Proper Time i.e. in Late Submission Late Submission
Submission of Lab next day Lab., with Late Submission by
by two days (after two days)
Fair Copy proper one day
documentation

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O
Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> E
Between 10 – 06 ----> A
Between 05 – 00 ----> B
Signature with Date
 PROJECT GROUP NUMBER: IT_PROJ_2020_
Project Title:
Name of the Supervisor:

Project II (CS 892) Assesment Rubric

Performance Excellent Good Fair Poor
Indicator (PI) 4 pts 3 pts 2 pts 1 pt
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Job The project is The project is not
The project is completed but The project is completed as per
Completion
completed as per tasks required minor completed but requered tasks described in
described in synopsis. modifications. several modifications. synopsis.
Requirement Excellent Good Fair Poor
Analysis Effectively Partially Contributed Attempted to contribute No contribution in
& contributed in in requirement in requirement analysis requirement analysis
Designing requirement analysis analysis and designing. and designing and designing.
and designing.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Developing a Developed the critical Developed some Attempted to develope No contribution in
Solution modules with modules with higher few developing a solution
with proper test optimized coding and complexity in coding modules (case specific) as well as testing.
cases designed most test and designed few test and test cases.
cases. cases.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Teamwork Worked very well with Worked well with the Worked with the team. No contribution as a
the team. team. member in the team.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Project Report Worked very well to Worked well to submit Tried to submit the No contribution in
submit an excellent the project report with project report but project report
Writing project report. covering all the standard of report was writing.
aspects of a standard not satisfactory.
report.
Project Excellent Good Fair Poor
Presentation Presented the project Presented the project Presented the project Presentation skill is
work flawlessly. work very nice. work not so good. not up to the mark.
Project Group Members
ROLL NUMBER
NAME

PI1
PI2
PI3
PI4
PI5
PI6
Comments (if any)
 OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING LAB.
(CS-594D )RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Assignment No.

Assignment Details

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptable

Assigned Expectations Marks
Content 5
3
1
0

Attended in proper Attended the Lab Attended the lab.,

Attendance in
Lab time. but half an hour but extreme late. Absent.
late.

All programs are

Capability of written precisely
writing based on the Some programs are Major errors in Programs are
Programs with algorithm/proced program writing.
proper ure, which have written accurately. not written.
explanations been written.

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are Major part of Wrong
Result Finding of results found. output/no
are clear. output not found. output found.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab All experiments

next day Lab., with Fair Copy in proper
Submission of that have been Late
properly written time but not found
Lab Fair Copy completed last day Submission.
Exp. Date, Exp. No. Exp. Date, Exp. No.
lab. , not found.
and Exp. Name. and Exp. Name.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O (5)

Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> E (4)
Between 10 – 06 ----> A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> B(0)
Signature with Date
 Numerical Methods LAB. (MCS 491)RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptable

Assigned Expectations Marks
Content 4* 3* 2*
1*

Discussion of the Proper discussion Improper Proper discussion Improper

problem with example. discussion with without example. discussion

example. without example.

Capability of writing Proper algorithms Algorithm with Algorithms with Improper / no

Algorithm without any minor mistakes. major mistakes. algorithms

mistake.
All programs are
Capability of writing written precisely Programs with Programs with Improper
based on the minor mistakes major mistakes programs (no
Program
proper algorithm. (syntax error). (logical error). match with algo.)

Represent all data

appropriately and Partly outputs are Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output finding the results found.
output not found. output found.
clearly.

Total Marks

Signature with Date

*NB: Submission of lab copy on proper date will carry additional one (1) mark in
each field.
 Assessment Rubrics for Seminar

Performance Indicators Inadequate Average Admirable Outstanding Score

1 2 3 4
(PI)
Background Material not clearly related Material sufficient for Material sufficient for Material sufficient for
to topic OR background clear understanding clear understanding AND clear understanding AND
PI 1 Knowledge and
but not clearly
dominated seminar effectively presented exceptionally presented
content presented
The report was poorly The report was structured The report was structured
structured, and the and formatted (e.g: font, in an orderly manner, and
PI 2 Documentation There was no structure of formatting (e.g: font, spacing, labelling of the formatting (e.g: font,
labelling of figures and figures and tables, spacing, labelling of
and Report report and the formatting tables, equations equations numbered and figures and tables,
numbered etc) include etc) in a satisfactory equations numbered and
very substantial and manner etc) was done properly.
Contents of Contents of presentations Contents of presentations

Organization of Hard to follow; sequence of presentations are not are not appropriate, Eye are appropriate and well
PI 3 presentation information jumpy, Very Poor appropriate and not well contact with few people delivered, Proper eye
delivery of presentation delivered, Poor delivery and clear voice with good contact with audience and
of presentation spoken language clear voice with good
spoken language

Acceptable but does not Attracts attention and

Body language, Starting well but make impact on the
Confidence & Unimpressive reflecting frequently faltering and audience, good linguistic makes the presentation
PI 4 Communicatio lack of confidence, low losing confidence, skill but often fails to lively, applies the art of
n Skill voice, poor linguistic skills. medium voice, and communicate effectively effective communication,
limited linguistic skill. and the voice is strong voice and linguistic
acceptable. skill.
Q&A and Sketchy explanation, Good explanation at Clear explanation with
examples, volunteers
PI 5 interaction, Wrong response or skips complicated some Questions, answering
Manners explanation, ill-mannered parts, needs support, good manners. hard/critical Qs, Well
lacking manners. mannered.
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LAB. (EE-691)
NAME……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………
YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...
UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX
DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

INDEX (Continue…)
 DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

INDEX (Continue…)
 DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

....……………………………… FOR FINAL LAB EXAMINER USE ONLY …………………………………

DATE OF FINAL OVERALL TOTAL LAB ATTENDED
GRADE IN
LAB EXAM. (OUT OF LAB CLASSES- )
LAB COPY
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT IN FINAL
LAB EXAMINATION
WHETHER THE STUDENT COULD
COMPLETE THE LAB EXPERIMENT YES NO
DURING LAB EXAM – (PUT TICK)
SIGNATURE OF THE EXAMINER IN FINAL LAB
EXAM. WITH DATE

Experiment Experiment Date

No.
Experiment
Name
 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LAB. RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Date
Experiment No.

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptable

Assigned Expectations Marks
Content 4
3
1
0

Attended in proper Attended the Lab Attended the lab.,

Attendance in Lab time. but half an hour but extreme late. Absent.
late.

Capability of writing
Observation Accurate & perfect Almost Accurate Partially Accurate Inaccurate
table/program
DRAWING(UML Very good & Correct average Correct poor
Diagram/Gantt correct drawing drawing using drawing using Drawing using
chart/PERT using pencil with pencil with proper pencil and without Pen/Incorrect
proper notation(s) proper notation(s) Drawing
chart/CFG) notation(s)

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output Finding of results found.
output not found. output found.
are clear.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab All experiments

Submission of Lab next day Lab., with Fair Copy in proper that have been
Fair Copy properly written time but not found completed last day Late Submission.
Exp. Date, Exp. No. Exp. Date, Exp. No.
lab. , not found.
and Exp. Name. and Exp. Name.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O (5)

Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> E (4)
Between 10 – 06 ----> A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> B(0)
Signature with Date
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SOFTWARE TOOLS LAB (CS - 492)

NAME………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………

YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...

UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX

....……………………………… FOR FINAL LAB EXAMINER USE ONLY …………………………………

DATE OF FINAL OVERALL TOTAL LAB ATTENDED
GRADE IN
LAB EXAM. (OUT OF LAB CLASSES- )
LAB COPY
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT IN
FINAL LAB EXAMINATION
WHETHER THE STUDENT COULD
COMPLETE THE LAB EXPERIMENT YES NO
DURING LAB EXAM – (PUT TICK)
SIGNATURE OF THE EXAMINER IN FINAL LAB
EXAM. WITH DATE

Experiment No. Experiment Date

Experiment
Name
 SOFTWARE TOOLS RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Criteria & Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptabl

Point Expectations e
Assigned Marks
Content 5 3 1 0

Attended the Attended the

Attendance in Attended in Lab but half an lab., but extreme Absent.
Lab proper time. hour late. late.

Capability of All programs are

written precisely
writing based on the Some programs Major errors in Programs
Programs with algorithm/proced are written program writing. are not
proper ure, which have accurately. written.
explanations been written.

Represent all data Wrong

appropriately. Partly outputs Major part of
Result Finding of results are found. output not output/no
output
are clear. found. found.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission

of All experiments
next day Lab., Lab Fair Copy in
that have been
Submission of with properly proper time but Late
Lab Fair Copy written Exp. Date, not found Exp. completed last Submission.
Exp. No. and Exp. Date, Exp. No. day lab. , not
found.
Name. and Exp. Name.
Total Marks with Grade

Marks Between 20 – 16 ---->O (5)

Between 15 – 11 ---->E (4)
Evaluation Between 10 – 06 ---->A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ---->B(0)
Signature with Date
 PROJECT GROUP NUMBER: CSE_PROJ_2020_
Project Title:
Name of the Supervisor:

Project II (CS 892) Assesment Rubric

Performance Excellent Good Fair Poor
Indicator (PI) 4 pts 3 pts 2 pts 1 pt
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Job The project is The project is not
The project is completed but The project is completed as per
Completion
completed as per tasks required minor completed but requered tasks described in
described in synopsis. modifications. several modifications. synopsis.
Requirement Excellent Good Fair Poor
Analysis Effectively Partially Contributed Attempted to contribute No contribution in
& contributed in in requirement in requirement analysis requirement analysis
Designing requirement analysis analysis and designing. and designing and designing.
and designing.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Developing a Developed the critical Developed some Attempted to develope No contribution in
Solution modules with modules with higher few developing a solution
with proper test optimized coding and complexity in coding modules (case specific) as well as testing.
cases designed most test and designed few test and test cases.
cases. cases.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Teamwork Worked very well with Worked well with the Worked with the team. No contribution as a
the team. team. member in the team.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Project Report Worked very well to Worked well to submit Tried to submit the No contribution in
submit an excellent the project report with project report but project report
Writing project report. covering all the standard of report was writing.
aspects of a standard not satisfactory.
report.
Project Excellent Good Fair Poor
Presentation Presented the project Presented the project Presented the project Presentation skill is
work flawlessly. work very nice. work not so good. not up to the mark.
Project Group Members
ROLL NUMBER

NAME
PI1
PI2
PI3
PI4
PI5
PI6
Comments (if any)
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
DATA STRUCTURE & ALGORITHM LAB (ES-CS - 391)
NAME………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………
YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...
UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX
DATE OF
EXP. DATE OF GRADE TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. EXP. /Marks SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION
 RUBRIC FOR DATA STRUCTURE & ALGORITHM LAB.

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Outstanding Excellent Average Below Average

Assigned
Marks
Parameters 4 3 2 1

All the steps are Most of the steps Few steps are None of the
Capability of writing implemented are implemented implemented steps are
Algorithm/Procedure correctly of an correctly of an correctly of an implemented of
algorithm algorithm algorithm an algorithm
Completeness of Completeness of Completeness of
code, consistent
Capability of writing code, Inconsistent code, consistent Program not
variable naming
Program variable naming and variable naming completed
and well
well formatted and unformatted
formatted
Completion in target 100% target has 75% target has been 50% target has 25% target has

in Lab been completed

completed been completed been completed
Most of the Some of the outputs Few outputs have None of the
Output outputs are are correct and well been found outputs are
correct and well formatted. correctly correct
formatted.
Proper Time i.e. in Late Submission Late Submission
Submission of Lab next day Lab., with Late Submission by
by two days (after two days)
Fair Copy proper one day
documentation

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O
Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> E
Between 10 – 06 ----> A
Between 05 – 00 ----> B
Signature with Date
 OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING LAB.
(CS-594D )RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Assignment No.

Assignment Details

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptable

Assigned Expectations Marks
Content 5
3
1
0

Attended in proper Attended the Lab Attended the lab.,

Attendance in
Lab time. but half an hour but extreme late. Absent.
late.

All programs are

Capability of written precisely
writing based on the Some programs are Major errors in Programs are
Programs with algorithm/proced program writing.
proper ure, which have written accurately. not written.
explanations been written.

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are Major part of Wrong
Result Finding of results found. output/no
are clear. output not found. output found.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab All experiments

next day Lab., with Fair Copy in proper
Submission of that have been Late
properly written time but not found
Lab Fair Copy completed last day Submission.
Exp. Date, Exp. No. Exp. Date, Exp. No.
lab. , not found.
and Exp. Name. and Exp. Name.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O (5)

Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> E (4)
Between 10 – 06 ----> A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> B(0)
Signature with Date
 Numerical Methods LAB. (MCS 491)RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptable

Assigned Expectations Marks
Content 4* 3* 2*
1*

Discussion of the Proper discussion Improper Proper discussion Improper

problem with example. discussion with without example. discussion

example. without example.

Capability of writing Proper algorithms Algorithm with Algorithms with Improper / no

Algorithm without any minor mistakes. major mistakes. algorithms

mistake.
All programs are
Capability of writing written precisely Programs with Programs with Improper
based on the minor mistakes major mistakes programs (no
Program
proper algorithm. (syntax error). (logical error). match with algo.)

Represent all data

appropriately and Partly outputs are Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output finding the results found.
output not found. output found.
clearly.

Total Marks

Signature with Date

*NB: Submission of lab copy on proper date will carry additional one (1) mark in
each field.
 Assessment Rubrics for Seminar

Performance Indicators Inadequate Average Admirable Outstanding Score

1 2 3 4
(PI)
Background Material not clearly related Material sufficient for Material sufficient for Material sufficient for
to topic OR background clear understanding clear understanding AND clear understanding AND
PI 1 Knowledge and
but not clearly
dominated seminar effectively presented exceptionally presented
content presented
The report was poorly The report was structured The report was structured
structured, and the and formatted (e.g: font, in an orderly manner, and
PI 2 Documentation There was no structure of formatting (e.g: font, spacing, labelling of the formatting (e.g: font,
labelling of figures and figures and tables, spacing, labelling of
and Report report and the formatting tables, equations equations numbered and figures and tables,
numbered etc) include etc) in a satisfactory equations numbered and
very substantial and manner etc) was done properly.
Contents of Contents of presentations Contents of presentations

Organization of Hard to follow; sequence of presentations are not are not appropriate, Eye are appropriate and well
PI 3 presentation information jumpy, Very Poor appropriate and not well contact with few people delivered, Proper eye
delivery of presentation delivered, Poor delivery and clear voice with good contact with audience and
of presentation spoken language clear voice with good
spoken language

Acceptable but does not Attracts attention and

Body language, Starting well but make impact on the
Confidence & Unimpressive reflecting frequently faltering and audience, good linguistic makes the presentation
PI 4 Communicatio lack of confidence, low losing confidence, skill but often fails to lively, applies the art of
n Skill voice, poor linguistic skills. medium voice, and communicate effectively effective communication,
limited linguistic skill. and the voice is strong voice and linguistic
acceptable. skill.
Q&A and Sketchy explanation, Good explanation at Clear explanation with
examples, volunteers
PI 5 interaction, Wrong response or skips complicated some Questions, answering
Manners explanation, ill-mannered parts, needs support, good manners. hard/critical Qs, Well
lacking manners. mannered.
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LAB. (EE-691)
NAME……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
.
DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………
YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...
UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX
DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

INDEX (Continue…)
 DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

INDEX (Continue…)
 DATE OF
SL. EXP. DATE OF GRADE / TEACHER’S
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT REPORT
NO. NO. EXP. REMARKS SIGNATURE
SUBMISSION

....……………………………… FOR FINAL LAB EXAMINER USE ONLY …………………………………

DATE OF FINAL OVERALL TOTAL LAB ATTENDED
GRADE IN
LAB EXAM. (OUT OF LAB CLASSES- )
LAB COPY
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT IN FINAL
LAB EXAMINATION
WHETHER THE STUDENT COULD
COMPLETE THE LAB EXPERIMENT YES NO
DURING LAB EXAM – (PUT TICK)
SIGNATURE OF THE EXAMINER IN FINAL LAB
EXAM. WITH DATE

Experiment Experiment Date

No.
Experiment
Name
 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LAB. RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Date
Experiment No.

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptable

Assigned Expectations Marks
Content 4
3
1
0

Attended in proper Attended the Lab Attended the lab.,

Attendance in Lab time. but half an hour but extreme late. Absent.
late.

Capability of writing
Observation Accurate & perfect Almost Accurate Partially Accurate Inaccurate
table/program
DRAWING(UML Very good & Correct average Correct poor
Diagram/Gantt correct drawing drawing using drawing using Drawing using
chart/PERT using pencil with pencil with proper pencil and without Pen/Incorrect
proper notation(s) proper notation(s) Drawing
chart/CFG) notation(s)

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output Finding of results found.
output not found. output found.
are clear.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab All experiments

Submission of Lab next day Lab., with Fair Copy in proper that have been
Fair Copy properly written time but not found completed last day Late Submission.
Exp. Date, Exp. No. Exp. Date, Exp. No.
lab. , not found.
and Exp. Name. and Exp. Name.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O (5)

Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> E (4)
Between 10 – 06 ----> A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> B(0)
Signature with Date
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SOFTWARE TOOLS LAB (CS - 492)

NAME………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

DEPARTMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………….. SECTION…………………

YEAR……………………………………………………………………... SEMESTER……………………………………………………...

UNIVERSITY ROLL NO………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

UNIVERSITY REGISTRATION NO…………………………………………………………………………………………...………….

INDEX

....……………………………… FOR FINAL LAB EXAMINER USE ONLY …………………………………

DATE OF FINAL OVERALL TOTAL LAB ATTENDED
GRADE IN
LAB EXAM. (OUT OF LAB CLASSES- )
LAB COPY
NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT IN
FINAL LAB EXAMINATION
WHETHER THE STUDENT COULD
COMPLETE THE LAB EXPERIMENT YES NO
DURING LAB EXAM – (PUT TICK)
SIGNATURE OF THE EXAMINER IN FINAL LAB
EXAM. WITH DATE

Experiment No. Experiment Date

Experiment
Name
 SOFTWARE TOOLS RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Criteria & Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptabl

Point Expectations e
Assigned Marks
Content 5 3 1 0

Attended the Attended the

Attendance in Attended in Lab but half an lab., but extreme Absent.
Lab proper time. hour late. late.

Capability of All programs are

written precisely
writing based on the Some programs Major errors in Programs
Programs with algorithm/proced are written program writing. are not
proper ure, which have accurately. written.
explanations been written.

Represent all data Wrong

appropriately. Partly outputs Major part of
Result Finding of results are found. output not output/no
output
are clear. found. found.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission

of All experiments
next day Lab., Lab Fair Copy in
that have been
Submission of with properly proper time but Late
Lab Fair Copy written Exp. Date, not found Exp. completed last Submission.
Exp. No. and Exp. Date, Exp. No. day lab. , not
found.
Name. and Exp. Name.
Total Marks with Grade

Marks Between 20 – 16 ---->O (5)

Between 15 – 11 ---->E (4)
Evaluation Between 10 – 06 ---->A (2)
Between 05 – 00 ---->B(0)
Signature with Date
 BASIC COMPUTATION & PRINCIPLES OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING
LAB. (CS - 291)RUBRIC FOR STUDENTS

Experiment Name

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Unacceptable

Assigned Expectations Marks
Content 4 3 1
0

Capability of writing Most of algorithms Some of algorithms Few of algorithms No algorithms or

Algorithm/Drawing or procedures are or procedures are or procedures are procedures are
Flow Chart written clearly. written written clearly. written.
undoubtedly.
All programs are
Capability of writing written precisely Some programs are Major errors in Programs are not
based on the program writing. written/wrong
Program written accurately.
question. program written.

Represent all data

appropriately. Partly outputs are Major part of Wrong output/no
Result or Output Finding of results found.
output not found. output found.
are clear.

Completion of target 100% target has 75% target has 50% target has 25% target has

in Lab been completed. been completed. been completed. been completed.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab

Fair Copy in proper
Attention to Lab Fair next day of lab., Very poor
time but not with Late Submission.
Copy with proper presentation.
proper
documentation.
documentation.

Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> O
Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> E
Between 10 – 06 ----> A
Between 05 – 00 ----> B
Signature with Date
Experiment No. Experiment Date

Experiment Name

NETWORK LAB (PCC CS 692) ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC FOR STUDENT

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Expectations Unacceptable
Assigned Marks
Content 4
3
1 0

Attended in proper Attended in proper Attended but came

Attendance in Lab on
the Day of Experiment time & day with time & day without very late and with / Absent.
without Rough
with Rough Copy Rough Copy. Rough Copy.
Copy.

All steps/programs Major

steps/programs
Experimental are completely
are completely Some major errors. Wrong attempt.
procedure correct and
correct and minor
accurate.
mistake.
Represent all data Represent some Represent some
appropriately. data appropriately. data appropriately. No result
Result Analysis Finding of results Finding of results Finding of results
analysis.
are clear. are clear. are unclear.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab

Submission of Lab Fair Proper Time i.e. in next day Lab but Fair Copy in proper Late Submission.
Copy next day Lab. without Index or time for missed
Chanel File. Lab Experiment.

Marking Page No., Page No(s). and Page No., Exp.

Exp. Date(s) are Date, Exp. No. are
Attention to Lab Copy Exp. Date, Exp. No. Only Page No(s). is missing in other not available on
properly in every / are missing. pages after first first Page of Lab
page. Page of Lab Report. Report and other
pages also.
Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> Z (5)

Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> Y (4)
Between 10 – 06 ----> X (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> W(0)
Signature of the Examiner with Date
Experiment No. Experiment Date

Experiment Name

NETWORK LAB ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC FOR STUDENT

Criteria & Point Acceptable Considerable Below Expectations Unacceptable
Assigned Marks
Content 4
3
1 0

Attended in proper Attended in proper Attended but came

Attendance in Lab on
the Day of Experiment time & day with time & day without very late and with / Absent.
without Rough
with Rough Copy Rough Copy. Rough Copy.
Copy.

All steps/programs Major

steps/programs
Experimental are completely
are completely Some major errors. Wrong attempt.
procedure correct and
correct and minor
accurate.
mistake.
Represent all data Represent some Represent some
appropriately. data appropriately. data appropriately. No result
Result Analysis Finding of results Finding of results Finding of results
analysis.
are clear. are clear. are unclear.

Proper Time i.e. in Submission of Lab

Submission of Lab Fair Proper Time i.e. in next day Lab but Fair Copy in proper Late Submission.
Copy next day Lab. without Index or time for missed
Chanel File. Lab Experiment.

Marking Page No., Page No(s). and Page No., Exp.

Exp. Date(s) are Date, Exp. No. are
Attention to Lab Copy Exp. Date, Exp. No. Only Page No(s). is missing in other not available on
properly in every / are missing. pages after first first Page of Lab
page. Page of Lab Report. Report and other
pages also.
Total Marks with Grade

Between 20 – 16 ----> Z (5)

Marks Evaluation Between 15 – 11 ----> Y (4)
Between 10 – 06 ----> X (2)
Between 05 – 00 ----> W(0)
Signature of the Examiner with Date
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR CHEMISTRY LAB (BS-CH191/CH291)
CATEGORIES Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Fair: 2 Unsatisfactory: 1

Punctual in the lab and Late in the lab but Late in the lab but Experiment is done in
Attendance experiment is experiment is not extra class due to Experiment is not done
experiment is completed
completed within the completed within the absence on assigned in the extra class also.
within the specific time.
specific time. specific time. days.
Demonstrates very good Demonstrates good Demonstrates average Demonstrates
Lab knowledge of both Demonstrates poor idea
knowledge of both theory knowledge of both reluctanance of either
theory and of theory and
performances and experimental theory and experimental theory or experimental
experimental experimental procedure.
procedure. procedure. procedure.
procedure.
Data Measurements, skills or Measurements, skills or Measurements, skills or Measurements, skills or Measurements, skills or
techniques are
techniques are very good techniques are good techniques are average techniques are poor and
accumulation Data is clearly represented represented but step represented and step Either data are

inadequate and
and accurate. and fairly accurate. and fairly accurate. inaccurate. inaccurate.
Data is clearly Data is clearly
Data analysis & and step wise calculations wise necessary wise necessary incomplete or step wise
b
a
L

calculations are missing Data, calculations and

are presented. If necessary, calculations are missing. calculations are missing. or necessary graph is graph are incomplete.
Calculation
graph is plotted with proper If necessary, graph is If necessary, graph is
not correctly scaled and
labelling along with units. plotted with proper plotted without proper
labeled.
labelling. labelling.
Interaction with Excellent team work with Very good team work Good team work with Minimum team work No team work and lack
with lack of proper
Group proper attitude with proper attitude proper attitude of proper attitude
attitude
Timely Writing Fair Lab copy Writing fair Lab copy Writing fair Lab copy Writing fair Lab copy Incomplete Lab copy
po
Re

rt

properly and submit before properly and late partially and submit partially and late and irregular
b
a
L

submission performing the next submission. before performing the submission. submission.
practical. next practical.
A STUDENT HAVE TO COMPLETE EIGHT EXPERIMENTS, EACH PRACTICAL WILL BE OUT OF 30 MARKS.
EVALUATION PROCEDURE OF A STUDENT FOR CHEMISTRY LAB [BS CH-191/291] ON THE SCALE OF 40 [i.e (GRAND TOTAL / 240) *40]
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION SHEET FOR CHEMISTRY LAB (BS-CH191/CH291)
Student Name: Roll No: Section: Sem: Year:
CATEGORIES Expt: 1 Expt: 2 Expt: 3 Expt: 4 Expt: 5 Expt: 6 Expt: 7 Expt: 8 Expt: 9 Expt: 10 TOTAL

Attendance
Lab performances
LabTechniqu

Data accumulation
e

Data analysis & Calculation

Interaction with Group

or

Timely submission
R
b

p
e
a
L

TOTAL

REMARKS

SIGNATURE OF TECHNICAL
ASSISTANTS / LAB INSTRUCTOR WITH
DATE

SIGNATURE OF FACULTY WITH DATE

 B.Tech. 1st Year, 2nd Sem, 2020
Basic Physics Laboratory (BS-PH-291) Evaluation Rubrics

A student has to complete ten experiments within the semester. In each week, student will be allowed to do only one experiment as per his/
her allotment. This internal evaluation of Physics laboratory will be done in a total of 100 marks. The distribution and explanation of the
marks are as follow:

Attendance: 5 Marks

The evaluation of attendance will be done at the end of the semester based on regularity and punctuality of the student.

Lab Technique:

The lab technique for each experiment in each week will be evaluated as per given rubrics.

Categories Excellent =5 Good=4 Fair=3 Marginal =2 Unsatisfactory =1

Very good Good Somewhat Minimal No participation;

Interaction with participation participation participation participation; sits on the
Group through shared through shared appears Shows little sidelines with no
participation and participation and interested but interest. interaction.
respect for others. respect for others. talks over team
mates.
Demonstrates Demonstrates Has a fair idea of Has some idea of Has no idea of the
Laboratory Viva good knowledge good knowledge both theory and experimental experiment at all.
of both theory of either theory experimental procedure.
and experimental or experimental procedure?
procedure. procedure.
Measurements, Measurements, Measurements, Demonstrate Measurements,
Data skills or skills or skills or incompetence in skills or
Accumulation techniques are techniques are techniques are measurements, techniques are
good and good. somewhat skills or incomplete and
accurate. inaccurate. techniques. inaccurate.

Laboratory Report:

The lab report for each experiment in a week will be evaluated as per given rubrics.

Categories Excellent =5 Good=4 Fair=3 Marginal =2 Unsatisfactory =1

Representation The theory, Any three within Any two within Any three within Any two within
apparatus, theory, theory, theory, theory,
procedure is apparatus, apparatus, apparatus, apparatus,
clearly stated procedure and procedure and procedure and procedure and
along with proper proper sketch of proper sketch of proper sketch of proper sketch of
sketch of the the experimental the experimental the experimental the experimental
experimental setup is present. setup is present. setup is present setup is present
setup. and incomplete. and incomplete.
Data Analysis Data is clearly Data is clearly Data is clearly Either data are Data, calculation
and Calculation represented and represented but represented and incomplete or and graph are
step wise step wise step wise step wise incomplete.
necessary necessary necessary calculations are
calculations are calculations are calculations are missing or
presented. If missing. If presented. If necessary graph
necessary, graph necessary, graph necessary, graph is not correctly
is plotted with is plotted with is plotted with scaled and
proper labeling proper labeling proper labeling labeled.
along with units. along with units. but units are
missing.
Results and Include error Error calculation Either error Error calculation Neither error
discussion calculation is grossly calculation or is grossly calculation nor
(accuracy of inaccurate but a discussion of the inaccurate or discussion of the
results) and a clear discussion results is missing. discussion of the results is
clear discussion of the results is results is missing. included.
of the results. present.
Timely Gets the Gets the Gets the More or less Irregular
Submission completed note completed note completed note meets the
book with proper book without book with proper deadline.
index corrected proper index index corrected
before corrected before within two weeks
performing the performing the from the
next practical next practical. performance of
the experiment.

● Thus total evaluating marks is 350 for ten experiments.

● The final evaluation of lab technique will be done in 95 marks.

B.Tech. 1st Year, 2nd Sem, 2020

Basic Physics Laboratory (BS-PH-291) Evaluation Record Sheet

Name of the Student : Stream:

Roll No. : Sub-Group:

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10
Exp. Exp. Exp. Exp. Exp. Exp. Exp. Exp. Exp. Exp.
Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name Name
Categories
Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date:

Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Marks: Marks: Marks: Marks: Marks: Marks: Marks: Marks: Marks: Marks:
35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
L
a Interaction with
b Group
T
e
c Laboratory Viva
h
n
i Data
q Accumulation
u
e
L
a Representation
b
R Data Analysis
e and Calculation
p
o Results and
r discussion
t
Timely
Submission

Marks obtained in = = = = = = = = = =
each week

Total Marks (m) =

Out of 350
…... ( )
X 95=
350

● Total marks obtained in laboratory class (out of 95), A =

● Marks obtained in attendance (out of 5), B =

● Total Internal marks obtained including attendance (out of 100) , (A+B) = 100

__________________

Signature of Faculty
 Language Laboratory (HM-HUZ91)
Assessment.Shect
Assessmentl:
(GSE A- 2nd 2019)
semester
u be able Business Card Presentatlon

communicate contidently and

Courseoutcome:
to
competently in English Languaue in all spheres.
Course Outcome

RIDO1.1 Develop listening, reading and writíng skills for better

C wdinate in a group on comprehension ability. (BT PSG1
HU291.2 PS5) contemporary topics speaking ability and
to
to ennance presentation skille (or
enhance BT
ull291.3 Build vocabulary speaking and writing skills (BT psG1
Demonstrate proper body language while
HU291
expressing one's ideas or
HU291
Interpret their views in Engish so as to
opinions (BT PS51
build self
overcome
hiective and
901.5

stage fear and

Rationale: course outcome confidence (RT DeAT
Sineve Assessment is a tool used to emphasis on what PS4)
assessment. ro
sures indicate what students gauge student students can do
rubrics is used as a
other know, formative performance. While generally tool of
objective nd during the semester to
help FORM assessments generally speaking multinle.choi formativa
y
adtheir There are indicate what students ca
performance progress. different level
rubric, informal
instruction. A
appropriate rubrics used
rubric is a
handy tool for
the teacher
measure ehad
anuation observation rubrics etc. to
measure student to
rubric is used. but for Assessment I performance ent
(Self
Sneng Rubric: Pl Performance Introduction) of this course neabis
indicates indicator and the aking
(from high to performance is scaled in an
ances 1ow Wnere * aenotes Always, 3
Scale denotes Often, 2 denotes
ascending order
and
according to
Category (Pl) 4 (From high to low)
Sometimes 1 denotes Rarel
their

Quality of the card Always Often interprets Sometimes

PI 1
interprets Most
of the time
(C01) about Clearly about clarity missing |
clearly in interpreting clarity is missing
him/her him/her about him/her in interpreting
about him/her
12 Articulation Often expresses Sometimes
Always

Expresses Most of the time

(C03,C04,co5) clearly about Clearly about clarity missing | clarity is missing
him/her n
expressing| in
him/her about him/her expressing
about him/her
PI3 Confidence (C04,C05) Always Often Sometimes
confident |
confident while while Nervous while
confident while
communicating communicating communicating communicating
Always Reflects| Often Reflects |Sometimes

PI3 Body language proper gesture, | proper gesture, Reflects proper Nervous and
(CO4) posture and eye | posture and eyeeure posture
shivers while
Contact while | contact while and eye contact
addressing the addressing the while addressing the
stru group group addressing the group
make group
have to follo are asked to a business card of
theirs and present and
express themselves in 90
follow a
he ns
question specific questi sequence given to them. to 120 seconds. 1ney
1. sequences are
Name, as follows:
Company and
Designation
drlef
introduction on the company wish to
Describe theentry levelp
they make their dream career.
Mention a few profile of their dream company.

exciting thinhings about the job profile.

 Langudpe
Assessment Sheet (SEA- 2nd semester 2019)
Assessment I: Public speaking(HOw tointroduce.an eminent person)
Date:
Course obiective:The students will be able to communicate
confidently and competently
in English Language in all
Course outcome: spherec
Course Outcome
HU291.1 Develop listening, reading and writing skills for better comprehension ability. (BT PSAT

speaking
HU291.2 Coordinate
in
a group oncontemporary topics to enhance ability and presentation skil. mmPS5)
HU291.3 Build vocabulary to enhance speaking and writing skills (BT PS6)

HU291.4 Demonstrate proper body language while expressing one's ideas or opinions (BT PS5)

HU291.5 Interpret their views in EnglishsSo as to overcome stage fear and build self confidence (BT PS4T

Rationale: Since the course objective and course outcome emphasis on what students can dorubricsis used a
assessment. Formative Assessment is a tool used to gauge student performance. While generally speaking mul of formative
other obiective measures indicate what students Know, rornmative assessments generally indicate what students can
nea na
other
objective the
semester to help FORM instruction. A rubric is a
handy tool for the teacher to
performance and their progress. There are airerent level appropriate rubrics used to measure student performance suchmeasure student
do and

rubric. team presentation rubric, informal obServation rubrics etc. but ror ASSessment il (Company profile
presentation) of this courca
group presentation rubric is used.
irse
umikorunn
presentation Rubric
order
Pdicates Performance indicator and the performance is scaled in an ascending according to their performances (from high to
ow where 4 denotes Always, 3 denotes Often, 2 denotes Sometimes and 1 denotes Rarely)
Category (Pl) Scale (From high to low)
4
PI1 Subject matter uses uses Sometimes
Always Often uses Rarely uses correct
(C01,C04, CO5) correct grammar | correct grammar and correct
and pronunciation pronunciation
is
grammar| grammar and
is adequate for adequate and pronunciation pronunciation is
for Is adequate for | adequate
for
understanding. understanding. understanding. understanding.
| PI2 as a The team as a The
Presentation skills | The team
(CO2,C04, CO5) whole doesn't whole doesn't| whole
team as The team as a
read
read mostly| whole reads
all
presentation
and
at| presentation too read presentation | presentation the entire
eye contact. makes much and makes and makes little | time and makes no
PL3 Team Participation| All
adequate eye contact.| eye contact. eye contact.

(CO2,c04,CO5) the members of Most members

of| Some members of Only one
team say the team member of
something something
say the team
say the team speaks

meaningful and meaningful something

on topic. on topic.
and meaningful and

PI4 Volume (CO5) on topic.

All students (theAll
students (the All students
audience) can
audience) (the All students (the
hear all the time hear 75%
can
audience) can
audience) can't
of the time hear 50% of the often hear the speakers
PI5 Time management as or more time or more
(CO2)
Presentation a
whole is of Presentation as a Presentation as a Presentation as

appropriate whole is a bit long or whole whole is considerably

short
in | considerably in
length as length as
long in length
too
too short length as
as the
indicated by the | indicated by the indicated by
indicated by the teacher.
struction: Students are formedteacher teacher. is teacher. Patel an
6-8 and each
to
eneur they have group assigned a of Mr.
and prepare a
groups of
script Karshan Bhai

brief
profile of
childhood, family e
E, achievements,
Se
hobbies, advseadvise to
the
him (profile includes his backgroutn gher
Lunction. e engineers who
Each
distribute the
want to be him
member will entrepreneurs etc.) and introduce as tne c
profile and
present. Time limit
intru nutes.
for each
group i
 Language Laboratory (HIM-HU2921)
Assessment Sheet(CSEA: 2nd semester 2019)
Assessment Il:Preparingand presentinga resume.otan eminentand successful person
Date:
Lourseobiective: The students will be able to communicate confidently and competently in English Language in at
Course outcome: es.

Course Outcome
HU291.1 Develop listening, reading and writing skills for better comprehension ability. (BT PS6)

HU291,2 Coordinate in a group on contemporary toplCs to ennance speaking ability and presentation skills (RT DCET

HU291.3 Build vocabulary to enhance speaking and writing skills (BT PS6)

HU291.4 Demonstrate proper body language while expressing one's ideas or opinions (BT PS51

HU291.5 Interpret their views in English so as to overcome stage fear and build self confidence (BT PS41
tests
Since the course
Rationale: objective and course outCome empnasis on wnat students can do rubrics is used as a taole
is a tool
ha

assessment.
ci Formative Assessment usea tO Bauge stuaent periOrmance. vwnie generally speaking multiple-choice

meascures indicate what students know, formative do and

assessments generally indicate what students can
generally administered during
the semester
to help FORM
Instruction.
A rubric is a handy tool for the and are
There teacher to meacuro cad
performance and their progress. are different
level appropriate rubricS used to measure student
performance such as sneal
rubteam presentation rubric, informal observation rubrics etc. Dut ror ASSessment ll aking
presentation rubric is used. [Company profile
presentation) of this course
Group presentation Rubric
PI indicates Performance indicator and the performance is scaled in an ascending order according to their performances (from high to
low where 4 3 denotes 2
denotes Always, Often, denotes Sometimes and 1 denotes Rarely)
Scale (From high to low)
Category (PI)

| PI1 Subjectmatter Always uses Often uses Sometimes uses Rarely

(C01,C03,C04, CO5) | correct grammar correct grammar and | correct uses correct
and pronunciation pronunciation is and grammar| grammar and
is adequate for | adequate pronunciation pronunciation is
understanding. understanding. for | is adequate for adequate for
understanding. understanding.
PI2 Presentation skills The team asa The team as aThe team as The

(CO2,C04, CO5) whole doesn't whole doesn't whole

team as a
read mostly | whole reads
presentation at read presentation too read
presentation presentation the entire
all
eye contact.
and makes much and makes
and makes little | time and makes no

PI3 adequate eye contact. eye contact. eye contact.

Team Participation All members
the of Most members of Some members of
Only one member
(CO2,C04,CO5) team say the team say the team
of
something something something
say the team speaks

meaningful and meaningful and meaningful and

on topic. on topic. on topic.
groups of 6-8 and resume of an eminent ana
and each present
MSEFUctiOn: Students are formed in group is assigned to prepare

a
Successful person in their respective fields like Steve
Jobs, Karshan Bhai
tach member will
distribute the different Patel, Sundar Pichai etc. and they have to present it in a group.
contents/
subjects of the resume
and present. Time limit for each group is 20 minutes.
 Language Laboratory (HM-HU291
Assessment Sheet(CSE A- 2nd semester 2019)
Assessment IV: Company Profile presentatlon
Date:
CoSeobiective The students will be able to communicate confidently and competently in English Laneusns
Course outcome: pheres.
Course Outcome
HU291.1 Develop listening, reading and writing skills for better comprehension ability. (BT PS

HU291.2 Coordinate in a contemporary toplcs to

group on ennance
speaking ability and presentation skille (PT
HU291.3 Build vocabulary to enhance speaking and writing skills (BT PS6) PS5)
HU291.4| Demonstrate proper body language while expressing one's ideas or opinions (BT PS51

HU291.5
Interpret their views in English so as to overcome
stage
fear
and build self confidence (BT PS41
Rationale: Since the course
objective
is
and
course outcome empnasis on what students can do rubrics is used as a t
assessment. Formative Assessment a tool
usea to gauge perormance. While
other objective measures indicate what studentsS student generally speaking multiple-choico
indicate
the to
Know,
rOrmaive assessments generally what students
generally administered during semester help FORM instruction. A rubric is
a handy tool for the teacher to
performance and their There are
progress. different level appropriate rubrics used
rubric, team presentation rubric, informal observation rubrics etc. but for ASsessment II
to measure student performance such ac
group presentation rubric is used. (Company profile presentationl of eh course

presentation Rubric
indicates Performance indicator and the performance is scalea in an ascenaing order according to their performances (from high to
lowwhere 4 denotes Always, 3 denotes Often, 2 denotes Sometimes and 1 denotes Rarely)

Category (P) Scale (From high to low)

4 3
2
PI1 Subject matter uses Often
Always uses Sometimes uses
uses Rarely
(C01,C04, Co5) correct grammar| correct grammar and correct corTect
and pronunciation pronunciation is grammar | grammar and
adequate for adequate and pronunciation| pronunciation is
for is adequate for | adequate for
understanding. understanding.
understanding. understanding.
team as a team as a
PI 2 Presentation skills The The The
team as a
(CO2,c04, Co5) whole doesn't whole doesn't The eam as d

read read
whole
mostly | whole reads
presentation at | presentation too | read presentation | presentation the entire
all and makes | much and makes and makes little | time and makes no
eye contact.
PI3 Team Participation| All
adequate eye contact eye contact. eye contact.
memberss of Most members of
(CO2,C04,C05) the team say | the | Some members of | Only one
member of
team say the team say the team speaks
something something something
meaningful and meaningful and meaningful and
on topic. on topic.
on topic.
PI4 Volume (CO5) | All students (the All students(the All students (the | All students
(the
audience) can audience) can audience) can audience) can't
hear all the time hear 75% of the time hear 50% of the | often hear the speakers
PI5|Time management| Presentation a or more time or more
as Presentation as a Presentation as a Presentation as a
(CO2) whole is of whole is a bit long or whole is whole is considerably
appropriate short in considerably too too short in length as
length by as length as long in length as indicated by the

indicated the indicated by the indicated by the teacher.

teacher.
Students are teacher. teacher
struction: formed in groups of 10-12 and each
group
is
assigned a specific company like Ericsson, l5M, l
metrik and
ThoughtWorks. Each S,
group has to prepare 6-8 ppt. slides on
erarcny, proaucts and
services, recruitment process and assigned company's history, achievemen r each
roup is 20 minutes.
conclusion. Each member will present at least 1 Sliae. 1
 Language Laboratory (HM-HU291)
Assessment Sheet.(CSEA-2md semester 2019
Assessment V: Mock Group Discussion
Date:
Course obiective: The students will be able to communicate confidently and competently in English Language tin ail l
Course outcome:
Course Outcome
HU291.1 Develop listening, reading and writing skills for better comprehension ability. (BT PS61

HU291.2ICoordinate in a group on contemporary topics to ennance speaking ability and presentation skille (Brrr

HU291.3| Build vocabulary to enhance speaking and writing skills (BT PS6)

HU291.4 Demonstrate proper body language while expressing one's ideas or opinions (BT PsE1

HU291.5 Interpret their views in English so as to overcome stage fear and buildself confidence (RT pcA
and
Rationale: Since the course objective course outcome
emphasis on what students can do rubrics is used as a tool of formatisn
assessment . Formative Assessment is a tool usea to gauge student perTormance. While generally speaking multinle.ch
other objective measures indicate what students know. formative assessments generaly indicate what hd
generally administered during the semester to help FORM instruction. A rubric is a handy toolfor the teacher
Derformance and their progress. There are
aifrerent level appropriate rubrics
used
to measure student performance such.
rubric. team presentation rubric, informal observation rubrics etc. but for ASSessment Il
rubric is used.
(Company profile presentation) of th
group presentation
imminini,
ourse

KGroup Discussion Rubric

PTindicates indicator and the
Performance pertormance is scaled in an ascending order according to their performances (from hiph to

low where 4 denotes Always, 3 denotes Often, 2 denotes Sometimes and 1 denotes Rarely)
Category (P) Scale
(From high to low)
2 1
Initiation Always initiates Often initiates and Sometimes initiates Rarely initiates
PI1 (CO2, C03,C04) and takes lead in takes lead in a and takes lead in a
a meaningful way meaningful way meaningful way and takes lead

Participation Always Often participates Sometimes Rarely

PI2 participates
(C04) enthusiastically enthusiastically in participates participates
in a group
a group
enthusiastically in a enthusiastically in
Relevance of Always gives an Often gives an group a group
PI3 responses Sometimes gives an Rarely gives an
(C01, C02, appropriate appropriate appropriate appropriate
C03,C04, CO5) response response response response
Team spirit Always Often coordinates Sometimes
Doesn't
P14 coordinates and coordinates and
(CO2) listens to others and listens to coordinate and
others viewpoint listens to others listens to others
viewpoint viewpoint viewpoint
Always reflects Often Reflects Sometimes Reflects Rarely Reflects
Body language proper gesture, proper gesture, proper gesture,
PI5 posture and eye proper gesture,
posture and eye posture and eye
(C04) contact while contact while contact while
posture and eye
contact while
addressing the addressing the addressing the addressing the
nstruction: Students are group group group
group
instructed to come
prepare on the
following topics for discussion
Cell
1. phones: a nuisance or a convenience?
Arranged
2. marriage
India cannot afford an
or love marriage?
3. extravaganza like Olympics
Multinational
4.
Internet:
companies: Are they devils in disguise?
5. a bane or a boon?
Digital India: Is it
6. an answer to good governance
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR WORKSHOP PRACTICE(ES-ME192/292)
CATEGORIES SUB-CATEGORIES Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Satisfactory: 2 Not Satisfactory: 1

Late or partial completion of the lab Experiment is done in Experiment is done in

ATTENDANCE Punctual and lab experiment is Late or partial completion of the lab extra class due to absence on extra class due to absence on
completed within the specific days. experiment within the specific days. experiment but not within the assigned days but completed within assigned days but not completed in
specific days.
the specific days specific days.
RECORD

The Lab copy contains proper The Lab copy contains proper The Lab copy contains proper The Lab copy contains proper
S

objective , proper sketch of the objective , proper sketch of the objective , proper sketch of the objective , improper sketch of the
LAB

experimental setup, procedure experimental setup, procedure experimental setup, but without experimental setup, without Poor Lab Copy containing improper
LAB COPY clearly clearly procedure procedure details about topics & Irrelevent
described with clear experimental described but without clear described & without clear described & without clear contents.
results if required experimental results if required experimental results if required experimental results if required

PROCEDURE Demonstrates excellent Demonstrates very good Demonstrates good Has partial idea about the Has no idea about the procedure to
ASSIGNMEN

through shared knowledge of lab knowledge of lab

TS

INTERACTION Minimal participation;

KNOWLEDGE knowledge of lab procedure to be followed. be followed

procedures. procedures. procedures.
Very good participation Very good participation Good participation No participation; sits on
WITH GROUP MEMBERS participation and respect for through shared through shared Shows little interest. the sidelines with no
LAB

participation and respect for others participation and respect for others interaction.
others.
ACCURACY Exceptionally good with accurate Assignments completed with very Assignments completed with fairly Assignments completed with Assignments completed with Poor
EXPERIM
ENTALRE
SULT

completion of given assignments good accuracy good accuracy accuracy which meets satisfaction. accuracy .

Exceptional performance with Very good performance with less Good performance with less than Satisfactory performance with less Poor Performance with less than
INTERNALVIV
A

more than 70% of the questions than 70% but more than 60% of the 60% but more than 50% of the than 50% but more than 40% of the 40% of questions answered
answered correctly questions answered correctly questions answered correctly questions answered correctly correctly

A STUDENT HAVE TO COMPLETE FIVE EXPERIMENTS, EACH PRACTICAL WILL BE OUT OF 30 MARKS,
EVALUATION PROCEDURE OF A STUDENT FOR WORKSHOP PRACTICE [ ME-192/292] ON THE SCALE OF 40 [i.e (GRAND TOTAL / 180) *100
ALRESULT
NTS
Student Name:

CATEGORIES

LAB
EXPERIMENT
INTERNALVIVA ASSIGNME LAB RECORDS

REMARKS:
S EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR WORKSHOP PRACTICE(ES-ME192/292)
I
L Student Roll No: Sem: Year:
I SUB-CATEGORIES
G
U CO: 1 CO: 2 CO: 3 CO: 4 CO: 5
R ATTEND
I ANCE

I
N (5)
O
A
B

P
C
L

S
T
(5) (5)
I PROCEDURE
T KNOWLEDGE
U INTERACTION
WITH GROUP
(5)

T MEMBERS
E ACCURACY

O
(5)

F
OVERALLKNOWLEDGEGATHE

T
REDABOUT

E
C
H
THE TOPIC

N
(5)

O
L
O
G
Y

SIGNATURE OF FACULTY WITH DATE:

SIGNATURE OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS / LAB INSTRUCTOR WITH DATE:

 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR ENGINEERING DRAWING & COMPUTER GRAPHICS(ME-191/ME-291)
CATEGORIES SUB-CATEGORIES Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Satisfactory: 2 Not Satisfactory: 1

Late or partial completion of the lab Experiment is done in Experiment is done in

ATTENDANCE Punctual and lab experiment is Late or partial completion of the lab extra class due to absence on extra class due to absence on
completed within the specific days. experiment within the specific days. experiment but not within the assigned days but completed within assigned days but not completed in
specific days.
the specific days specific days.
LAB RECORDS

Lab sheet is not submitted within

Lab sheet is submitted within Lab sheet is submitted within Lab sheet is not submitted within
Lab sheet is submitted within specific specific days but when submitted
LAB SHEET specific days with excellent specific days with fairly good specific days and when submitted
days with very good presentation. later it was found with very good
presentation. presentation. later it was found not satisfactory.
presentation.
ASSIGNME

PROCEDURE Demonstrates excellent Demonstrates very good Demonstrates good The technique followed by the The technique followed by the
NTS

The technique followed by the The technique followed by the The technique followed by the

knowledge of lab knowledge of lab knowledge of lab Has partial idea about the Has no idea about the procedure to
KNOWLEDGE procedure to be followed. be followed
procedures. procedures. procedures.
TECHNIQUE student is Excellent student is very good student is good student is Satisfactory student is not satisfactory
LAB

ACCURACY Exceptionally good with accurate Assignments completed with very Assignments completed with fairly Assignments completed with Assignments completed with Poor
EXPERIM
ENTALRE
SULT

completion of given assignments good accuracy good accuracy accuracy which meets satisfaction. accuracy .

Exceptional performance with Very good performance with less Good performance with less than Satisfactory performance with less Poor Performance with less than
INTERNALVI
VA

more than 70% of the questions than 70% but more than 60% of the 60% but more than 50% of the than 50% but more than 40% of the 40% of questions answered
answered correctly questions answered correctly questions answered correctly questions answered correctly correctly

A STUDENT HAVE TO COMPLETE FIVE EXPERIMENTS, EACH PRACTICAL WILL BE OUT OF 30 MARKS,

EVALUATION PROCEDURE OF A STUDENT FOR ENGINEERING DRAWING & COMPUTER GRAPHICS[ ME-191/291] ON THE SCALE OF 40 [i.e (GRAND TOTAL / 150) *40]
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR ENGINEERING DRAWING & COMPUTER GRAPHICS(ME-191/ME-291)

Student Name: Student Roll No: Sem: Year:

CATEGORIES SUB-CATEGORIES
CO: 1 CO: 2 CO: 3 CO: 4 CO: 5

LAB ATTENDANCESHEET

MENTS PROCEDURE
KNOWLEDGE
TECHNIQUE

ACCURACY
OVERALLKNOWLEDGEABOUTGATHEREDTOPIC
THE

LRE IN
SU T
LT ER
N
A
L
V
I
V
A

A
S
S
I
G
N

L
A
B

R
E
C
O
R
D
S
EX
PE
RI
M
E
N
LAB

REMARKS:

SIGNATURE OF FACULTY WITH DATE:

SIGNATURE OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS / LAB INSTRUCTOR WITH DATE:
 OVERALL

OF
SIGNATURE &
EVALUATION CRITERION ATTENDANCE LAB SHEET PROCEDURE TECHNIQUE KNOWLEDGE

ASSIGNMENT
KNOWLEDGE GATHERED ABOUT
DATE (Teacher

DETAILS
THE TOPIC (VIVA) in charge)
Assignment:1

(Date: )
Assignment:2
(Date: )
Assignment:3
(Date: )
CO1 Assignment:4
(Date: )
Assignment:5
(Date: )
TOTAL

TOTAL (SCALE OF 5)

Assignment:1

(Date: )
Assignment:2
(Date: )
Assignment:3
(Date: )
Assignment:4
(Date: )
Assignment:6
(Date: )
Assignment:7
CO2 (Date: )
Assignment:8
(Date: )
Assignment:9
(Date: )
Assignment:10
(Date: )
TOTAL

TOTAL (SCALE OF 5)
 Assignment:1
(Date: )

Assignment:2
(Date: )

Assignment:3
(Date: )

CO3 Assignment:4
(Date: )

Assignment:5
(Date: )

TOTAL

TOTAL (SCALE OF 5)

Assignment:1
(Date: )

Assignment:2
(Date: )

Assignment:3
(Date: )

CO4 Assignment:4
(Date: )

Assignment:5
(Date: )

TOTAL

TOTAL (SCALE OF 5)

*FOR ASSIGNMENTS EACH FIELD WILL CARRY TOTAL MARKS OF 5

*AT THE END OF SEMESTER THE TOTAL OF EACH INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION CRITERION HAS TO BE MADE FOR INDIVIDUAL CO AND SCALE IT ON 5
*AFTER SCALING IT ON 5 THE RESPECTIVE MARKS HAS TO BE PUT ON SHEET2 OF THE RUBRICS FOR Cos
 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR ENGINEERING GRAPHICS & DESIGN(ES-ME191/ES-ME291)

Student Name: Student Roll No: Sem: Year:

CATEGORIES SUB-CATEGORIES
CO: 1 CO: 2 CO: 3 CO: 4

ATTENDANCE

LAB RECORDS
LAB SHEET

ASSIGNMENTS

PROCEDURE
KNOWLEDGE
I
N
T TECHNIQUE
E
R
N
THETOPIC

A
L
GATHEREDABOUT

V
KNOWLEDGE

I
OVERALL

V
A
L
A
B

REMARKS:
SIGNATURE OF FACULTY WITH DATE:

SIGNATURE OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS / LAB INSTRUCTOR WITH DATE:

 SILIGURI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR ENGINEERING GRAPHICS & DESIGN(ES-ME191/ES-ME291)
CATEGORIES SUB-CATEGORIES Excellent: 5 Very Good: 4 Good: 3 Satisfactory: 2 Not Satisfactory: 1

Late or partial completion of the lab Experiment is done in Experiment is done in

ATTENDANCE Punctual and lab experiment is Late or partial completion of the lab extra class due to absence on extra class due to absence on
completed within the specific days. experiment within the specific days. experiment but not within the assigned days but completed within assigned days but not completed in
specific days.
the specific days specific days.
LAB RECORDS

Lab sheet is not submitted within

Lab sheet is submitted within Lab sheet is submitted within Lab sheet is not submitted within
Lab sheet is submitted within specific specific days but when submitted
LAB SHEET specific days with excellent specific days with fairly good specific days and when submitted
days with very good presentation. later it was found with very good
presentation. presentation. later it was found not satisfactory.
presentation.

PROCEDURE Demonstrates excellent Demonstrates very good Demonstrates good Has partial idea about the Has no idea about the procedure to
ASSIGNMEN

The technique followed by the The technique followed by the The technique followed by the
TS

The technique followed by the The technique followed by the

KNOWLEDGE knowledge of lab knowledge of lab knowledge of lab procedure to be followed. be followed
procedures. procedures. procedures.
TECHNIQUE student is Excellent student is very good student is good student is Satisfactory student is not satisfactory
LAB
INTERNALVIV

Exceptional performance with Very good performance with less Good performance with less than Satisfactory performance with less Poor Performance with less than
A

more than 70% of the questions than 70% but more than 60% of the 60% but more than 50% of the than 50% but more than 40% of the 40% of questions answered
answered correctly questions answered correctly questions answered correctly questions answered correctly correctly
LAB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RUBRIC (FOR SYSTEM DESIGN LAB)
Inadequate Needs Developing Good Excellent Score
performance improvement

indicators 0-4 5-6 7-8 9-10

PI 1 More or less Punctual & Most of the time punctual &

Participation & Irregular Punctual & Regular
Regularity regular Regular.

PI 2
Background Refers the textbooks Good background Well prepared with sufficient
preparation - lists No background preparation
preparation before the knowledge on the design
ideas found in occasionally.
design work. aspect
the textbook

PI 3 Design is Design is somewhat Design is both

incomplete, inaccurate Design is mostly

Design meets the inaccurate and very accurate and precise and
and/or imprecise accurate
requirements imprecise. may show innovation

No use of tools some amount of usage of Design is mostly carried out Extensive use of modern
PI 3 softwares using modern tools tools for the design &
Use of modern tools
validation.

No participation; sits on Minimal participation; Good participation; Shows outstanding

PI 4 Shows little interest; Participation, does the

appears interested;
Design Log Book the sidelines with no doesn't payattention assigned task, managing
enthusiastic maintains a
log book; irregular maintenance of time properly; maintains a
design log book;
log book; proper log book

TOTAL SCORE
LAB REPORT EVALUATION RUBRIC
Inadequate Needs Developing Good Excellent Score
performance improvement

indicators 0-4 5-6 7-8 9-10

PI 1 More or less meeting Most of the time Meeting Meeting Deadlines

Timely Irregular
deadlines deadlines regularly
Submission

PI 2 Lack of organization, Inconsistent clarity, gaps in Mostly clear, logical Overall organization clear &

Organization & develops very logically;

incoherent development logical development, progression, a few parts
Preparation of easy to read and
and/or unreadable overall hard to follow hard to follow
report understand

Methods and/or calculations Methods, techniques, Mostly explains methods, Fully explains all methods,
missing or faulty Results unclear, measurements and techniques, measurements techniques, measurements
erroneous or partially missing; calculations identified but and calculations made Resultsand calculations made
PI 3 objectives not met. Some parts incomplete Some results presented; objectives mostly Presented clearly and
Results &
impossible to read or understand. presented; objectives complete Explains concisely; completes all
Conclusions Conclusions not fully explained partially met. Some parts conclusions with mostly clear objectives; Fully explains any
and/or lack sufficient rationale or hard to read or understand. rationale conclusions with clear
support. Explains some conclusions rationale.
and/or some rationale

TOTAL SCORE
LAB VIVA EVALUATION RUBRIC
Inadequate Needs Developing Good Excellent Score
performance indicators improvement

0-4 5-6 7-8 9-10

Knowledge of Does not have grasp of At ease with information; At ease; answered all Demonstrated full
PI 1 subject information; answered only questions but failed to knowledge; answered all
answered most questions
rudimentary questions elaborate questions with elaboration
Conceptual Unable to explain the Partially explains the Adequately explains the Explains fully the
PI 2 Mathematical/technical Mathematical/technical Mathematical /technical mathematical/technical
Understanding
concept(s) involved. concept(s) involved. concepts(s) involved. concepts involved.
Communication Communicates few Communicates some Communicates all ideas
Unable to communicate ideas ideas clearly and needs clearly and fluently and
PI 3 and body ideas clearly and good
and unprofessional attitude improvement in excellent professional
language professional attitude.
professional attitude attitude.
Appears generally at Appears fairly Appears very
Appears uneasy and ease and confident. comfortable and comfortable and
PI 4 Confidence level somewhat insecure. Rarely Sometimes faces the confident. Generally confident. Consistently
faces the audience
or audience and maintains faces the audience and faces the audience and
makes eye contact. eye contact. maintains good eye maintains good eye
contact. contact.

TOTAL SCORE
STUDENT GRAND VIVA EVALUATION RUBRIC
Evaluate the student’s Grand viva employing the following range-scored criteria (best is on right)

Inadequate Average Admirable Outstanding Score

performance indicators
1 2 3 4 4

Knowledge of Does not have grasp of At ease with information; At ease; answered all Demonstrated full
PI 1 subject information; answered only questions but failed to knowledge; answered all
answered most questions
rudimentary questions elaborate questions with elaboration
Conceptual Unable to explain the Partially explains the Adequately explains the Explains fully the
PI 2 Mathematical/technical Mathematical/technical Mathematical /technical mathematical/technical
Understanding
concept(s) involved. concept(s) involved. concepts(s) involved. concepts involved.
Little use of accurate Uses most technical Uses technical terms
Incorrect use of technical terms accurately and accurately and
Use of technical technical terms and have
terms and does not have have adequate appropriately and have
PI 3 Language & real partial knowledge about
knowledge about real world knowledge about real adequate knowledge
world examples real world applications &
applications & issues . world applications & about real world
issues
issues applications & issues
Communication Communicates few Communicates some Communicates all ideas
Unable to communicate ideas ideas clearly and needs clearly and fluently and
PI 4 and body ideas clearly and good
and unprofessional attitude improvement in excellent professional
language professional attitude.
professional attitude attitude.
Appears very comfortable Appears fairly Appears generally at Appears uneasy and
comfortable and
and confident. Consistently ease and confident. somewhat insecure.
confident. Generally
PI 5 Confidence level faces the audience and Sometimes faces the Rarely faces the
faces the audience
maintains good eye and maintains good audience and audience or makes
contact. maintains eye contact. eye contact.
eye contact.

TOTAL SCORE

CO1 PI1,PI2,PI3 Demonstrate systematic understanding of knowledge related to 4 years study of B. Tech. in EE
CO2 PI1,PI2 Utilise the knowledge and ideas to deal with real world problems and issues clearly.
CO3 PI3,PI4 Show verbal communication and presentation skills.
Demonstrate confidence and versatility in answering the varieties of questions posed by a
CO4 PI 5 group of interviewer in a moderately short duration.

Revised on 15-03-2016
LAB PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RUBRIC
Inadequate Needs Developing Good Excellent Score
performance improvement

indicators 0-4 5-6 7-8 9-10

PI 1 More or less Punctual & Most of the time punctual &

Participation & Irregular Punctual & Regular
Regularity regular Regular.

Measurements, skills or Measurements, skills or Measurements, skills or

Techniques in lab are Measurements, skills or
PI 2 techniques in lab are techniques in lab are both
incomplete, inaccurate techniques in lab are mostly
Lab Techniques somewhat inaccurate and accurate and precise and
and/or imprecise accurate
very imprecise. may show innovation

PI 3 Safety procedures were ignored. Lab is carried out with some Lab is generally carried out Lab is carried out with full
Safety Procedures & Did Not follow directions. attention to relevant safety with attention to relevant attention to relevant safety
Directions procedures & directions. safety procedures & procedures & directions.
directions.
Minimal participation; Shows outstanding
Good participation; leadership qualities
Shows little interest; through shared
PI 4 appears interested;
No participation; sits on doesn't pay attention to participation and respect
Ability to work in a enthusiastic but talks
the sidelines with no other group members; for others; keeps others on
group over teammates or may
interaction; disinterested; may argue to get point task,managingtime;
"hog" tasks; trys to help
across;helps group only Assumes responsibility for
group complete tasks;
when asked; effective functioning of the
group.

TOTAL SCORE
LAB REPORT EVALUATION RUBRIC
Inadequate Needs Developing Good Excellent Score
performance improvement

indicators 0-4 5-6 7-8 9-10

PI 1 More or less meeting Most of the time Meeting Meeting Deadlines

Timely Irregular
deadlines deadlines regularly
Submission

PI 2 Lack of organization, Inconsistent clarity, gaps in Mostly clear, logical Overall organization clear &

Organization & develops very logically;

incoherent development logical development, progression, a few parts
Preparation of easy to read and
and/or unreadable overall hard to follow hard to follow
report understand

Methods and/or calculations Methods, techniques, Mostly explains methods, Fully explains all methods,
missing or faulty Results unclear, measurements and techniques, measurements techniques, measurements
erroneous or partially missing; calculations identified but and calculations made Resultsand calculations made
PI 3 objectives not met. Some parts incomplete Some results presented; objectives mostly Presented clearly and
Results &
impossible to read or understand. presented; objectives complete Explains concisely; completes all
Conclusions Conclusions not fully explained partially met. Some parts conclusions with mostly clear objectives; Fully explains any
and/or lack sufficient rationale or hard to read or understand. rationale conclusions with clear
support. Explains some conclusions rationale.
and/or some rationale

TOTAL SCORE
 STUDENT PROJECT EVALUATION RUBRIC
Evaluate the student’s Project employing the following range-scored criteria (best is on right)

Performance indicators Inadequate Average Admirable Outstanding Score

1 2 3 4
Unable to understand the Unable to understand the
Project objectives and
Project objectives and did not Project objectives are
applied engineering Project objectives are well
Understanding of apply engineering elements clearly understood and
PI 1 elements such as design, understood and applied
such as design, synthesis, Applied appropriate
Project Objectives synthesis, mathematical suitable engineering
mathematical modelling, or engineering elements in the
modelling, or simulation as elements in the project.
simulation as applicable in project.
applicable in the project is
the project.
limited.

Content & The information presented The information presented

PI 2 The information presented is The information presented is relevant coverage with is relevant with higher
methodology isolated and the methods are is relevant and the methods accurate support. Methods degree of originality and
not described. are partly described. are described & explained methods are clearly
described.
Results & Results & explanations are Results are appropriately
PI 3 explanations
not appropriate
Results are well explained Results are well explained
explained
Analysis
Project activities were Project activities were Project activities were
Planning and poorly identified and not identified but some were clearly identified and
PI 4 scheduling of Project No project schedule provided arranged practically in a not arranged practically in a arranged practically in a
Activities project schedule with project schedule with project schedule with
timeline timeline timeline
Employ appropriate Employ appropriate
Does not make use of analytical tools and/or
Use of modern Employ some analytical analytical tools and/or
PI 5 analytical tools and/or devices. Clearly
tools and/or devices devices acquired in his
tools/devices devices relevant to the demonstrates mastery of
acquired. course of study to the
project several areas of the
project at hand
curriculum
Performance indicators Inadequate Average Admirable Outstanding Score
1 2 3 4
Some work was adapted
Originality The work was entirely Most work was adapted from previous work and/or The concept of the work is
PI 6 from previous works, did demonstrated creativity and original/ novel and/or
adapted for previous works
not demonstrate creativity critical thinking in a demonstrated creativity and
and critical thinking satisfactory manner critical thinking.

The report was poorly The report was structured in

structured, and the The report was structured an orderly manner, and the
There was no structure of formatting include very and formatted in a formatting was done
PI 7 Formatting and report and the formatting was substantial and consistent satisfactory manner. Some properly in accordance to
organisation of
beyond the guidelines. error. References provided references were not reliable the guidelines. All
report
No references provided were not reliable (e.g (e.g internet content) and references were apparently
internet content) and relevant reliable (e.g journals) and
relevant relevant

Bare organizationand Basic organization and Excellent organization and

preparation. Good organization and
Delivery – preparation. preparation.
Confident in only some preparation.
Lack of confidence and Confident and relaxed in
PI 8 Presentation skills & parts of the presentation. Confident in most parts of
Communication (Q/A) familiarity in some parts of Answer most questions the presentation. Answer the whole presentation.
the presentation. Answer at correctly. most questions correctly Handle difficult questions
least one question correctly. with ease and confidence.
Need clarification and concisely.
Need clarification. Illustrative explanation
sometimes.
The student did not The student understood
Self-Initiatives & The student did not understand some parts of most parts of the project The student understood the
understand the project and the project and did not and showed some self- project well and showed
PI 9 commitment
did not show any self- showself-initiativein initiative in handling and self-initiative in handling
initiative at al handling and planning of planning of the tasks for the and planning of the tasks
the tasks for the project project for the project

TOTAL SCORE

CO1 PI 1 Recognise the relevancy and necessity / usefulness of the project in current scenario a
technical problem of current relevance to Electrical Engineering and allied field.
CO2 PI 2 Research the problem and identify the solution methodology
CO3 PI3,PI5 Validate and analyze the results by Simulation/Experimentation and construction of
systems using modern tools/devices
CO4 PI4,PI6 Demonstrate time management and commitment towards professional ethics.
CO5 PI7,PI8 Develop interpersonal skills, communication skills and technical report writing skills.
CO6 PI 9 Able to evolve as a committed self-learner.
STUDENT SEMINAR ON INDUSTRIAL TRAINING EVALUATION RUBRIC

Evaluate the student’s performance employing the following range-scored criteria (best is on right)

Inadequate Average Admirable Outstanding Score

performance indicators
1 2 3 4

Shows absolutely no interest Shows lack of interest in Show positive feelings Shows a very strong positive
Industrial in industrial training. Have no about industrial training feeling about industrial
industrial training.
training knowledge about the experience Moderate training experience. Extensive
PI 1 experience company. Minimal knowledge about knowledge about the knowledge about the
the company.
& Training completion company. company. Training completion
Training completion
orientation certificate received with Training completion certificate received with
certificate received
remarks. certificate received appreciation.
Formatting and The report was poorly
Report submitted was not structured, and the The report was structured The report was structured in
PI 2 organisation of formatting include very and formatted ina an orderly manner, and the
structured. substantial and consistent satisfactory manner formatting was done properly.
Training report
error
Very Poor delivery of Contents of presentations Contents of presentations Contents of presentations are
Presentation presentation. are not appropriate and not
PI 3 skill Mumbles and/or well delivered are appropriate appropriate and well delivered
Incorrectly pronounces Presentation Short OR Most of the seminar Well-paced throughout.
some terms . dragging in parts well paced
presentation short/rushed

The trainee’s learning The trainee’s learning The trainee’s learning The trainee’s learning
Overall learning experience is good and
PI 4 experience is unclear or very experience is poor or experience is rich and exibits
experience exibits self learning
poor. insufficient. self learning capability.
capability.

TOTAL SCORE

CO1 PI 1 Gain knowledge about recent trends, issues and developments in industry.
CO2 PI1,PI2 Apply the engineering knowledge to real industrial situations.
CO3 PI2,PI3 Develop technical reports and presentation with the help of ICT.
CO4 PI 3 Demonstrate communication skills and time management.
CO5 PI 4 Able to evolve as a self learner.

Revised on 15.03.2016
STUDENT SEMINAR EVALUATION RUBRIC

Evaluate the student’s seminar presentation employing the following range-scored criteria (best is on right)

Inadequate Average Admirable Outstanding Score

performance indicators
1 2 3 4

Content & Content not clearly related to Content sufficient for Content is sufficient for Content sufficient for clear
Knowledge topic. clear understanding understanding
PI 1 clear understanding.
relevancy Does not have grasp of At ease with Demonstrated full
At ease with information.
information. information. knowledge.
Very Poor delivery of Contents of presentations Contents of presentations Contents of presentations
presentation. are not appropriate and not
Presentation are appropriate and well
Mumbles and/or Incorrectly well delivered are appropriate
PI 2 Skill delivered
pronounces some terms . Presentation Short OR Most of the seminar Well-paced throughout.
presentation short/rushed dragging in parts well paced

Bibliography includes some Bibliography is not Bibliography is more or Well organised

Contribution of web links. bibliography
PI 3 organised. less organised
work Significance not mentioned or Significance exceptionally
Significance mentioned. Significance explained
just hinted well explained

The report was poorly The report was structured

structured, and the The report was structured
in an orderly manner, and
formatting (e.g: font, and formatted (e.g: font,
Preparation of the formatting (e.g: font,
PI 4 Report submitted was not spacing, labelling of figures spacing, labelling of figures
Report spacing, labelling of figures
structured. and tables, equations and tables, equations
and tables, equations
numbered and etc) include numbered and etc) in a
numbered and etc) was
very substantial and satisfactory manner
done properly.
consistent error

TOTAL SCORE

CO1 PI 1 Gain knowledge about recent trends, issues and developments in technology.
CO2 PI 4 Develop technical reports.
CO3 PI2,PI4 Develop interpersonal skills, software skills as well as communication skills.
CO4 PI 2 Deliver presentation with the help of ICT
CO5 PI1,PI3 Evolve as a self-learner.

Revised on 15-03-2016