DT Comment Key
DT Comment Key
Highlighting Statements
As suggested in the textbook, creating highlighting statements can be chal-
lenging. This process requires authors to take a step back from the data and
ask "what does this data mean?" For instance, the data in Table 9 leads to the
assumption or conclusion that Japanese scientists have difficulties.
Table 9 presents some very interesting data for writers to consider. Here are
a few highlights from one of our writing classes.
• Hedges are more frequent than either attitude markers and boosters.
• The rates of attitude markers in the softer sciences are rather similar.
• Attitude markers are more frequent in the softer sciences than the
harder sciences.
• Philosophy uses more stance markers than other fields.
• In terms of hedges, Biology differs from all of the harder sciences.
• Physics and the Engineering fields seem rather similar.
• It is somewhat surprising that Marketing has more hedges per 1,000
words than all of the other fields and that it is more like Philosophy.
There are other aspects that can be highlighted, of course. Consider ask-
ing your students to write a commentary based on the data.
4: DATA COMMENTARY 85
The items that are underlined indicate caution toward the claim; expressions
that are circled boost the claim.
A. There are~explanations for why musicians have~
cognitive abilities to non-musician controls. First, it is possible that
only the more intellectually rigorous people continue with music
training once they have been exposed to it. Practicing a musical
instrument takes a~amount of discipline. Individuals
who are willing to work that hard may also work hard in academic
settings, thus improving their cognitive abilities. Secondly, socio-
economic class could be playing a role. In a study comparing
scholastic aptitude among musicians and non-musicians, Phillips
found a difference in the two groups, but once socio-economic class
was taken into account the difference nearly disappeared (Phillips,
1976). It is possible that the differences between musicians and non-
musicians is actually innate or caused by something not musically
related in the environment.
MICUSP File PSY.Gl.03.1
There are so many possibilities here that we do not feel the need to provide
any sample responses. In our experience, this task works well if students are
challenged to provide the most hedged but still potentially acceptable
claims. Who can go farthest? This is almost a parody of academic discourse.
A note about the first statement: Yes, research does indicate that in some
countries tall people are likely to have higher salaries than short people.
4: DATA COMMENTARY 87
If you would like to offer some more information on the language for
making comparisons, jump to Unit Seven. Some of the examples there are
quite complex.
Organization
Many of our students really like the opening of Student C's text because of
the expression decision-making patterns. When we ask them whether it is a
good strategy to use the same wording as the table title, some change their
minds and opt for B. We think that all three opening sentences are fine, but
B seems to offer a more original description of the table content because of
the expression solely responsible for important decisions.
Most of our students do not think that Student A has produced a partic-
ularly good commentary because it repeats information readers should be
able to see for themselves. The commentary fails to point out that the dif-
ferences are really not that great, instead focusing on minor differences.
Student B does a good job of highlighting that there are more similarities
than differences and pointing out the one big difference where parents are
very involved when it comes to boys-clothing. It would have been more
interesting if the author had offered an explanation. Is it because boys are
less interested in what they wear and so parents simply buy clothing know-
ing that their boys will be content? Student C also emphasizes the overall
similarity of parental decision-making for boys and girls but further notes
where parents and their children are equally involved. Student C's text is also
more general in the sense that it talks about the parental involvement in
terms of it being high, low, and similar, which we know is common in
Results sections. What is missing, however, are highlights clearly pointing to
precise differences between boys and girls. Even so, we prefer C to the other
two.
88 COMMENTARY
This is another task that asks students to evaluate a content instructor's com-
ments (something that students should do all the time, of course). It seems
to us that none of the comments are really worthless, but depending on the
differing expectations of different fields, students can vary in terms of how
they evaluate them. For what they are worth, here are our own thoughts.
'R- 1. Yes, we agree that international students are singled out unfairly.
The focus of the commentary ignores the fact that international
students in some fields finish earlier than domestic students
(e.g., Education, the humanities, and some Engineering and
non-science fields). Unfortunately, the commentary seems to be
trying to reinforce a misconception that international students
need more time to complete degrees.
4: DATA COMMENTARY 89
Concluding a Commentary
We encourage students to conclude and not simply stop at the end. Students
can consider the implications of the data and even call for research on an
aspect of the data worthy of further consideration.
Figure 8 shows how long people can survive in water when wear-
ing different kinds of clothing with different levels of insulation. As
can be seen, clothing clearly influences survival times. The most
effective forms of protection in all water temperatures are wet and
dry suits, with dry suits offering the greatest amount of survival
time.
90 COMMENTARY
Task Sixteen could be done in pairs in class or for homework. Here are our
answers.
Did your students notice the summary phrase this phenomenon in Sen-
tence 5? Do you or your students think the text is overly cautious?