Reference 1
Reference 1
Conclusion
A clinical decision support system’s skin image classifier can serve as a second opinion for
dermatologists. Although a large research community has helped, these AI-based systems can only
make predictions and cannot explain their rationale. This is where XAI approaches come in. We
demonstrated how to approach skin image analysis in a domain-specific manner. For example, if a
dermatologist identifies a lesion as a nevus but the model labels it as a melanoma, both the doctor
and the patient may wonder “Why?” Our method includes explanations such as “if the color of the
lesion is constant, the classifier’s confidence in melanoma diagnosis drops.” The clinician may
then notice the color irregularity in the dermatoscopic picture, which is not evident on the
lesion, and figure out why the classifier predicted incorrectly. Whether the clinical decision
support system supports or opposes the physician’s diagnosis, offering human-readable reasons
fosters confidence and improves system knowledge. Furthermore, our perturbation-based explanation
technique for diagnosis employing medically relevant and irrelevant characteristics may have
implications in other medical domains. In Table 14, we are showing the implications of our model to
other medical images dataset. The dataset is just tested by our model. In the future, we will train
our model by using attention/transformer so that the interpretability score get increase.
Conclusion
The malignant lesion is the leading cause of death due to skin cancer. If it is diagnosed in the
early stages its treatment may be possible. In literature, deep learning approaches have been used
to detect cancer but the performance of the individual learners is limited. The performance can be
enhanced by combining the decision of diverse individual learners for decision-making on sensitive
issues such as cancer. This paper developed an ensemble model to detect skin cancer. It is
developed by combining decision the three deep learning models of VGG, Caps-Net, and ResNet. It is
noticed from the results that the proposed ensemble achieved an average accuracy of 93.5% with a
classification training time of 106 s. The proposed model performs better than individual learners
with respect to different quality measures i.e. sensitivity, accuracy, F-Score, specificity, false-
Positive, and precision. In future, we are intend to study the achievement of reinforcement
learning-based techniques for skin cancer detection.
Conclusion
Skin cancer, recognized as one of the most deadly forms of cancer, poses a significant threat to
individuals worldwide. Among its types, malignant melanoma stands out as a particularly dreadful
form, characterized by the abnormal growth of melanocyte cells. While skin lesions are prevalent,
accurately characterizing them and automating the identification of malignant tumors from
dermoscopy images remain complex challenges in the field.
This study aimed to address these challenges by leveraging convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to
diagnose and classify various types of skin lesions, using the extensive ISIC 2019 and ISIC 2020
datasets. To prepare the data for analysis, a comprehensive preprocessing pipeline is implemented,
including image augmentation, normalization, and resizing. Notably, advanced techniques such as
ImageDataGenerator and GAN are employed for effective data augmentation, and the resulting outcomes
are thoroughly compared. The proposed CNN-based approach involved aggregating results from multiple
iterations, enabling the enhancement of overall classification accuracy. Moreover, an extensive
evaluation of different transfer learning models, including VGG16, VGG19, SVM, and a hybrid
VGG19+SVM model, is conducted to assess their efficacy in skin lesion classification.
The experimental results on the ISIC 2019 dataset showcased promising accuracy levels, with the
VGG16 and VGG19 models achieving accuracies of 92% and 93% respectively. Particularly noteworthy is
the hybrid VGG19+SVM model, which exhibited the highest accuracy of 96%. On the ISIC 2020 dataset,
the VGG16, VGG19 and SVM models achieved accuracies of 90%, 92% and 92% respectively. These
findings underscore the potential of CNN-based approaches in the accurate diagnosis and
classification of skin lesions. Leveraging transfer learning models, such as VGG16, VGG19, SVM, and
the hybrid VGG19+SVM model, proved instrumental in achieving higher classification accuracy. This
study contributes valuable insights to the field of automated skin cancer detection and
classification, paving the way for improved diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Conclusion
In this study, a novel attention module called CCPA (Coordinated Channel and Position Attention) is
proposed. The CCPA module combines coordinate attention and channel attention while incorporating
partial convolution. This module effectively addresses the issue of insufficient inter-channel
information and improves the spatial feature extraction capability. Additionally, the CCPA module
is integrated with the EVC (Enhanced Visual Context) module and residual module to construct a new
skin cancer recognition model named ECRNet. This integration further enhances the capability of
skin cancer image recognition.
Experimental results demonstrate that the ECRNet model achieves outstanding performance in skin
cancer image recognition tasks, surpassing traditional CNN and ViT (Vision Transformer) methods.
However, our model has not reached the desired depth, which directly limits its performance in
terms of accuracy and precision. In order to improve the overall effectiveness of the model, we
must conduct more in-depth research and exploration on the depth and accuracy of the model. In
addition, we plan to further study Convnext-tiny in combination with CCPA and EVC modules to
improve the recognition of high-noise images and achieve more significant improvements in future
work.
Abstract:
Skin cancer is a senior public health issue that could profit from computer-aided diagnosis to
decrease the encumbrance of this widespread disease. Researchers have been more motivated to
develop computer-aided diagnosis systems because visual examination wastes time. The initial stage
in skin lesion analysis is skin lesion segmentation, which might assist in the following
categorization task. It is a difficult task because sometimes the whole lesion might be the same
colors, and the borders of pigment regions can be foggy. Several studies have effectively handled
skin lesion segmentation; nevertheless, developing new methodologies to improve efficiency is
necessary. This work thoroughly analyzes the most advanced algorithms and methods for skin lesion
segmentation. The review begins with traditional segmentation techniques, followed by a brief
review of skin lesion segmentation using deep learning and optimization techniques. The main
objective of this work is to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of a wide range of algorithms.
Additionally, it examines various commonly used datasets for skin lesions and the metrics used to
evaluate the performance of these techniques.
Conclusion
Skin cancer is one of the illnesses that is spreading the quickest on the earth. Skin cancer is
mostly brought on by a person’s vulnerability to the sun’s UV radiation. Given the limited
resources available, early identification of skin cancer is essential. Accurate diagnosis and
identification viability are generally essential for skin cancer prevention strategies.
Additionally, dermatologists have trouble seeing skin cancer in its early stages. The use of deep
learning for both supervised and unsupervised applications has increased significantly in recent
years. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are one of these models that have excelled in object
identification and classification tasks (CNN). The dataset is filtered from MNIST: HAM10000, which
has a sample size of 10015 and includes seven different types of skin lesions. Data preprocessing
methods include sampling, segmentation using an autoencoder and decoder, and dull razor. The model
was trained using transfer learning methods like DenseNet169 and Resnet 50. Different ratios were
used for the training and assessment, including 80:20, 70:30, and 40:60. When undersampling and
oversampling were compared, DenseNet169’s undersampling technique produced accuracy of 91.2% with a
f1-measure of 91.7% and Resnet50’s oversampling technique produced accuracy of 83% with a f1-
measure of 84%. The future extension of this study includes increasing forecast accuracy through
parameter tuning.