Modernism, Constructivism Research
Modernism, Constructivism Research
SOVIET UNION
In 1919, Vladimir Tatlin proposed the Monument to the Third International, a 400-meter tall
structure symbolizing the revolution, featuring a dynamic design with a cube, pyramid, and
cylinder that rotated at di erent speeds for various governmental agencies. This kinetic
composition embodied the spirit of Constructivist architecture, which aimed to merge abstract
art with building design, re ecting the revolutionary ideals of a new Communist society.
Constructivist architects, such as Konstantin Melnikov and Moisei Ginzburg, sought to
in uence society through their designs. Melnikov's workers' clubs served as centers for
proletarian culture, while Ginzburg's Narkom n Communal House emphasized communal
living. However, divisions emerged within the movement, notably between ASNOVA and OSA,
regarding the balance between expression and functionality.
By 1929, the All-Union Society of Proletarian Architects (VOPRA) criticized Constructivism for
its perceived abstraction, leading to the adoption of socialist realism as the o cial architectural
style by the mid-1930s. This shift prioritized clarity and accessibility in design, moving away
from avant-garde ideas.
The 1934 Palace of the Soviets competition exempli ed this transition, culminating in Boris
Iofan's design, which emphasized traditional monumental elements rather than Constructivist
abstraction. Subsequent projects, like Moscow's subway stations and the Moscow State
University, re ected a Stalinist aesthetic focused on grandeur and symbolism, distinct from
Western modernist approaches. After Stalin's death in 1953, architects began to explore new
design strategies beyond the constraints of socialist realism.
The International Style emerged largely as a result of four factors that confronted architects at
the beginning of the 20th century: (1) Increasing dissatisfaction with building designs that
incorporated a mixture of decorative features from di erent architectural periods, especially
where the resulting design bore little or no relation to the function of the building; (2) The need
to build large numbers of commercial and civic buildings that served a rapidly industrializing
society; (3) The successful development of new construction techniques involving the use of
steel, reinforced concrete, and glass; and (4) A strong desire to create a "modern" style of
architecture for "modern man". This underlined the need for a neutral, functional style, without
fl
fl
ff
fl
fi
fi
fi
ff
ffi
any of the decorative features of (say) Romanesque, Gothic, or Renaissance architecture, all of
which were old-fashioned, if not obsolete.
These three factors led architects to seek an honest, economical, and utilitarian style of
architecture that could make use of the new building methods and materials being developed,
while still satisfying aesthetic taste. Technology was a critical factor here; the new availability of
cheap iron and steel, together with the discovery in the late 1880s and 1890s of the steel
skeleton structure, made the traditional brick and stone building techniques obsolete. In
addition, architects began using steel-reinforced concrete for oors and other secondary
support elements, and fenestrating the exteriors of buildings with glass. The resulting austere
and disciplined architecture was thus formed according to the principle that modern buildings
should re ect a clear harmony between appearance, function, and technology.
The typical characteristics of International Style buildings include rectilinear forms; plane
surfaces that are completely devoid of applied ornamentation; and open, even uid, interior
spaces. This early form of minimalism had a distinctively "modern look", reinforced by its use
of modern materials, including glass for the facade, steel for exterior support, and concrete for
interior supports and oors.
The phrase "International Style" was rst coined in 1932 by curators Henry-Russell Hitchcock
(1903-1987) and Philip Johnson (1906-2005), in literature for their show "International
Exhibition of Modern Architecture" (1932), held at the Museum of Modern Art, New York. The
aim of the show was to explain and promote what they considered to be an exemplary
"modern" style of architecture. As it was, all but two of the buildings showcased were
European. The only American structures on display were Lovell House, LA (1929), by Richard
Neutra; and the Film Guild Cinema, NYC (1929), designed by Frederick John Kiesler
(1890-1965).
many architects felt dissatis ed with the limitations and formulaic methodology of the
International Style. They wanted to design buildings with more individual character and with
more decoration. Modernist International Style architecture had removed all traces of historical
designs: now architects wanted them back. All this led to a revolt against modernism and a
renewed exploration of how to create more innovative design and ornamentation. As
Postmodernism took hold, building designers began creating more imaginative structures that
employed modern building materials and decorative features to produce a range of novel
e ects. By the late 1970s, modernism and the International Style were nished.