Das Nas San
Das Nas San
Such delicate decisions and balancing acts include costs, current and projected
storage capacity needs, and scalability, among others.
There are three primary options for an organization’s or business’s data storage
systems, i.e., SAN (Storage Area Network), NAS (Network Attached Storage), and DAS
(Direct Attached Storage).
While previously only a limited number of storage devices could connect to a server,
a SAN allows the flexibility to connect to one or more servers, and multiple users can
share a pool of storage resources.
SAN is often used as dedicated storage for professional and enterprise environments.
Advantages of SAN
With externalized storage, storage capacity can easily be increased to the network’s
maximum limit. A SAN can support hundreds of drives using disk arrays.
A disk array is a group of disks that work together to achieve higher data transfer
and input/output rates than those provided by single large disks.
Better performance
As opposed to traditional file server and storage solutions, SANs, using block
storage, connect the data source directly to the target, which increases throughput
and delivers faster performance.
Enhanced availability
Since storage exists independently in a SAN, it’s more fault-tolerant than a server
with disk arrays connected to it, for instance.
The malfunctioning of one or two disks will not have adverse effects as the other
functioning disks will continue working unencumbered, making it a reliable storage
solution for mission-critical stored data and disaster recovery.
A NAS device is able to provide file-level access across the network, using NAS
storage protocols such as NFS, to multiple devices and user groups.
Windows servers using the SMB protocol to share storage via the network can also
be regarded as NAS.
NAS can be scaled up by adding more drives to the node or using disk arrays, and
scaled out by adding performance capabilities in addition to storage capacity
through adding NAS appliance nodes.
Advantages of NAS
Cost
NAS devices use regular Ethernet networks rather than the costly fiber-channel
network used in SAN.
NAS devices can be expanded by simply adding more nodes or drives as needed. A
NAS can start at a small scale with a few terabytes of storage capacity and be scaled
up to a petabyte scale by adding more nodes.
Simple management
NAS devices are easily manageable as they use regular or standard protocols and file
systems that most users are familiar with.
Home networks: for remote employees who need to consolidate their business and
work files on a secure device that can be centrally managed
Departmental servers: for workgroups or departments in an organization that need to
share files and other digital assets securely on the LAN
Remote access: for organizations with multiple offices, branches, or remote staff who
need to access the same set of data at once.
Big Data: NAS can be used to store large volumes of unstructured data, such as IoT
and video surveillance data.
This is a storage device that directly attaches to a PC, laptop, or server. With DAS, no
network connection of any sort is used, as opposed to NAS and SAN.
Advantages of DAS
Cost
Since it does not require or utilize a network connection, it’s the least costly of all the
storage modes.
Simplified management
Flexible capacity
Since it’s a plug-and-play affair, a user can simply add another hard drive to a PC or
server without the need for specialized IT personnel to help with setup and
management.
DAS is a viable option for small businesses or individuals looking to expand storage
capacity without paying for expensive features that they might not need.
Workstations: when there’s a need to attach additional hard drives or external storage
devices that can hold large files on individual desktops, laptops, and even security and
video management systems
While DAS connects directly to the server, NAS and SAN use the network to create
storage pools, which are accessed and managed over the network.
The main difference between SAN and NAS is that SAN uses block-level architecture,
while the latter uses file-level. Block storage separates metadata from the data set,
while file-level storage processes the complete dataset, including its metadata, which
is thus the reason why SAN systems are faster than NAS systems and are more aptly
suited for heavy enterprise-grade workloads.
DAS can be cheap and relatively fast, but it also creates data islands, which increase
inefficiency and the possibility of human error.
Total cost of ownership (TCO): depending on the unique organization, onsite storage
might be more or less economical than outsourcing storage to cloud service providers.
Storage capacity: data-intensive businesses have vastly different needs and priorities
than organizations that only have to deal with a few files or gigabytes of data.
Data security and protection: regardless of size, all organizations prioritize data
security, some more so than others. The more critical data an organization handles,
the greater the need for secure and robust storage. This also extends to the safety of
data against unauthorized access.
Performance: data-intensive organizations that rely on and process large amounts
require higher levels of performance, which informs their choice of storage.
Infrastructure scalability: an organization that foresees a situation where incoming
data volume will increase and need to be stored for processing will prioritize storage
modes that are easily scalable.
Human resources: the number of people or staff a company is willing to employ in
managing the data infrastructure