Andrej, 2007

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Journal of Medical Microbiology (2007), 56, 4–8 DOI 10.1099/jmm.0.

46930-0

Review Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli: epidemiology,


virulence and detection
Andrej Weintraub
Correspondence Karolinska Institute, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Bacteriology,
Andrej Weintraub Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden
[email protected]

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) is a subgroup of diarrhoeagenic E. coli (DEC) that


during the past decade has received increasing attention as a cause of watery diarrhoea, which is
often persistent. EAEC have been isolated from children and adults worldwide. As well as sporadic
cases, outbreaks of EAEC-caused diarrhoea have been described. The definition of EAEC is the
ability of the micro-organism to adhere to epithelial cells such as HEp-2 in a very characteristic
‘stacked-brick’ pattern. Although many studies searching for specific virulence factor(s) unique for
this category of DEC have been published it is still unknown why the EAEC cause persistent
diarrhoea. In addition, the aggregative property of EAEC causes a lot of problems in serotyping due
to the cells auto-agglutinating. The gold standard for identification of EAEC includes isolation of the
agent and an adherence assay using tissue culture, viz. HEp-2 cells. This assay is in most cases
reliable; however, emergence of ‘atypical’ EAEC has been described in several publications. In
addition, the HEp-2 assay is time consuming, demands a tissue culture lab and trained staff. Several
molecular biological assays have been described, however, none show 100 % specificity.

Introduction mechanisms. The EIEC, EHEC and ETEC are defined as


Escherichia coli is the type species of the genus Escherichia E. coli strains possessing specific virulence attributes,
that contains mostly motile Gram-negative bacilli that fall including different toxins, invasion plasmid and coloniza-
within the family Enterobacteriaceae. It is the predominant tion factors. Almost half a century ago, Ewing et al. (1963)
facultative anaerobe of the human colonic flora. The determined that certain serotypes of E. coli were associated
organism typically colonizes the infant gastrointestinal with outbreaks of diarrhoea. Strains belonging to these
tract within hours of life, and thereafter E. coli and the serotypes were referred to as EPEC. In 1979, Cravioto and
host derive mutual benefit for decades (Kaper et al., 2004). colleagues described an in vitro assay based on the adhesion
However, there are several highly adapted E. coli clones that of the bacteria to HEp-2 cells showing that EPEC bind to the
have acquired specific virulence factors, which increase their cells in a localized pattern (Cravioto et al., 1979). A few years
ability to adapt to new niches and allow them to cause a later it was shown that adherent non-EPEC strains were
broad spectrum of diseases. Three general clinical syn- associated with diarrhoea. These strains were called
dromes can result from infection with pathogenic E. coli ‘enteroadherent E. coli’ (Cravioto et al., 1991; Mathewson
strains: enteric/diarrhoeal disease, urinary tract infection et al., 1985, 1987). At the same time, Nataro et al. (1987)
and sepsis/meningitis (Nataro & Kaper, 1998). As long as recognized two different phenotypes among the enteroad-
these bacteria do not acquire genetic elements encoding herent strains, i.e. diffuse and aggregative. The finding of
virulence factors, they remain benign commensals. Strains Nataro was the first description of EAEC. The aggregative
that acquire ‘foreign’ DNA encoding enterotoxins, adhesins adherence is characterized by a ‘stacked-brick’ formation of
or invasion factors become virulent and can cause either a bacterial cells attached to the HEp-2 cells (Nataro & Kaper,
plain, watery diarrhoea or inflammatory dysentery. 1998; Nataro et al., 1998). The basic strategy of EAEC seems
to comprise colonization of the intestinal mucosa, probably
predominantly that of the colon, followed by secretion of
Enteroaggregative E. coli enterotoxins and cytotoxins (Nataro et al., 1998). Studies on
Among the E. coli causing intestinal diseases, there are six human intestinal specimens indicate that EAEC induces
well-described categories: enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), mild, but significant, mucosal damage (Hicks et al., 1996).
diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC), enteroinvasive E. coli EAEC strains characteristically enhance mucus secretion
(EIEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterohaemor- from the mucosa, with trapping of the bacteria in a
rhagic E. coli (EHEC) and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) bacterium-mucus biofilm (Nataro & Kaper, 1998). Two
(Nataro & Kaper, 1998). These categories have virulence further observations support a role of mucus in EAEC
attributes that help bacteria to cause diseases by different pathogenesis: EAEC bound avidly in the rabbit in vitro

4 46930 G 2007 SGM Printed in Great Britain


EAEC: epidemiology, virulence and detection

model (Wanke et al., 1990) and volunteers fed EAEC strains group was 39 % (Vu Nguyen et al., 2006). Many of the
excrete mucoid stools (Nataro et al., 1995). The formation epidemiological surveys that identified EAEC as a diarrhoeal
of a heavy biofilm may be related to the diarrhoeagenicity of pathogen were done in developing countries. However,
the organisms and, perhaps, to its ability to cause persistent EAEC has been found to be associated with diarrhoea in
colonization and diarrhoea. In addition to forming a developed countries as well.
mucous biofilm, many EAEC strains induce cytotoxic effects
on the intestinal mucosa. In animal models infected with
EAEC in rabbit and rat ileal loops, light microscopy showed Developed countries
some destructive lesions (Vial et al., 1988). EAEC also In a Scandinavian case–control study the prevalence and the
induced shortening of the villi, haemorrhagic necrosis of the association of EAEC with diarrhoea was greater than for
villous tips, and a mild inflammatory response with oedema EPEC (Bhatnagar et al., 1993). Another study conducted in
and mononuclear infiltration of the submucosa. Both light
east London showed that EAEC could be recovered from
and electron microscopy showed adherent bacteria without
children with acute and persistent diarrhoea (Chan et al.,
the attaching and effacing lesion, which is characteristic of
1994). A clear association of EAEC with diarrhoea in
EPEC. The clinical features of EAEC diarrhoea are
children in Germany was shown by Huppertz et al. (1997)
increasingly well defined in outbreaks, sporadic cases and
who recovered EAEC from 16 (2 %) of 798 children with
the volunteer model. Typical illness is characterized by
diarrhoea but none from 580 healthy controls. Other
watery, mucoid, secretory diarrhoea with low-grade fever
and little to no vomiting (Bhan et al., 1989b; Paul et al., European studies in children (Knutton et al., 2001; Presterl
1994). However, up to one third of patients with EAEC et al., 1999) also indicate that EAEC may be a leading cause
diarrhoea had grossly bloody stools (Cravioto et al., 1991). of diarrhoeal disease in developed as well as developing
countries. In a Serbian neonatal ward an outbreak of EAEC
Epidemiology diarrhoea was described by Cobeljic et al. (1996) where 19
babies were affected and 3 of these patients got diarrhoea.
Developing countries One EAEC strain resistant to multiple antibiotics was
A growing number of studies have supported the association implicated. In the largest reported outbreak so far, 2697
of EAEC with diarrhoea in developing countries, most (40.6 %) Japanese children who ate infected school lunches
prominently in association with persistent diarrhoea (Bhan had severe diarrhoea and EAEC was found in 10 % of cases
et al., 1989a, b, c; Fang et al., 1995; Lima et al., 1992). Several (Itoh et al., 1997). Several other outbreaks both in children
studies in children with diarrhoea have shown a significant and in adults have been described in the UK (Smith et al.,
difference in the prevalence of EAEC compared to the 1997; Spencer et al., 1999), India (Pai et al., 1997) and France
controls (Bhatnagar et al., 1993; Bouzari et al., 1994; (Boudailliez et al., 1997; Morabito et al., 1998).
Cravioto et al., 1991; Gonzalez et al., 1997; Nataro et al.,
1987). EAEC and persistent diarrhoea syndrome have been In a 1 year prospective Swedish study on enteropathogens in
consistently associated (Fang et al., 1995; Lima et al., 1992; adult patients with diarrhoea and healthy control subjects,
Wanke et al., 1991). The increasing number of such reports 105 of 760 patients with diarrhoea were positive for DEC.
and the rising proportion of diarrhoeal cases in which EAEC EAEC was present in 16 cases and was the second most
are implicated suggest that EAEC are important emerging common isolate among DEC surpassed only by ETEC
agents of paediatric diarrhoea. (Svenungsson et al., 2000). Other studies have shown that
this pathogen is an important cause of travellers’ diarrhoea
During the initial years after the discovery of EAEC there (Adachi et al., 2001; Gascón et al., 1998; Schultsz et al.,
were a lot of doubts about the pathogenicity of this category
2000). However, documented reports are less common
of diarrhoeagenic E. coli (DEC) (Echeverria et al., 1992;
because EAEC is not sought in many studies. Travellers to all
Gomes et al., 1989). However, Nataro et al. (1995) showed
developing countries are at risk and if EAEC were sought in
that a reference strain of EAEC could cause diarrhoea in a
all laboratories, infection by this pathogen could explain
volunteer study. In addition, a number of outbreaks have
over 25 % of cases for which no pathogen is recovered
proven that at least some EAEC strains cause diarrhoea in
(Adachi et al., 2001).
humans. Furthermore, many case–control and cohort
surveys of the past 15 years strongly suggest that EAEC is
an important cause of diarrhoea in people of all ages in
developing and industrialized countries. In a recent study Immunocompromised
from Vietnam by Vu Nguyen et al. (2006) it was shown that Diarrhoea is an important cause of morbidity in the
EAEC is more frequently associated with diarrhoea in immunocompromised. A wide range of pathogens is
children less than 2 years of age. In this study, 587 children implicated in AIDS-associated diarrhoea, and in many
of less than 5 years of age with diarrhoea and 249 age- cases a causative agent is not found. Case reports from
matched healthy controls were examined for, among other Mayer & Wanke (1995) described that EAEC could be
pathogens, EAEC. Of all identified EAEC strains in the recovered from diarrhoeal stools from AIDS patients. There
diarrhoeal group, 87 % were isolated from children less than have been other reports after epidemiological surveillance
2 years of age. The corresponding figure for the control among HIV-positive patients (Mayer & Wanke, 1995).

http://jmm.sgmjournals.org 5
A. Weintraub

Virulence factors in the literature as non-typable or as O-rough. It is also well


established that the EAEC group is highly heterogeneous.
In order to cause diarrhoeal disease, EAEC adheres to
Huppertz et al. (1997) analysed EAEC from German children
intestinal mucosa, forms a mucoid biofilm and induces toxic
and found that of 14 typable isolates all belonged to different
effects on the intestinal mucosa that result in diarrhoea. The
serotypes. In another study in the UK, 97 EAEC strains were
exact mechanism of pathogenesis is not fully understood;
serotyped to 40 different O-types. However, the remaining
however, adhesins, toxins and several other factors have
121 EAEC isolates were non-typable (Food Standards Agency,
been implicated. Certain strains carry a high molecular
2000). In a study by Jenkins et al. (2006a), 93 out of 143 EAEC
weight plasmid associated with the aggregative adherence
strains could be serotyped and belonged to as many as 47
(Law et al., 1998; Vial et al., 1988), on which a number of
different serotypes. This shows that serotyping, although
virulence genes are located. These are (i) heat stable toxin-1
useful in the characterization of other DEC, is of little value in
(EAST-1) (Savarino et al., 1991), (ii) aggregative adherence
the diagnosis of EAEC. As mentioned earlier, the HEp-2
fimbriae I and II (AAF/I and AAF/II) (Nataro et al., 1992;
adherence test is the gold standard for the identification of
Rich et al., 1999), as well as the AAF/III (Bernier et al., 2002).
EAEC. This test requires specialized facilities and can
Also located on the plasmid are (i) transcriptional activator
therefore only be conducted in reference laboratories, and
gene (Nataro et al., 1994, 1998), (ii) anti-aggregation
strict adherence to protocol is required (Haider et al., 1992;
protein gene (Sheikh et al., 2002), and (iii) anti-aggregation
Vial et al., 1990). Several attempts have been made to develop
protein transporter gene (Baudry et al., 1990). In
a molecular biological assay for the identification of EAEC. In
addition, the plasmid-encoded toxin (Eslava et al., 1998)
1990, Baudry and colleagues developed a DNA probe,
and a cryptic ORF known as shf (Czeczulin et al., 1999) have
CVD432, that was found to be 89 % sensitive and 99 %
been described. Other virulence factors that are believed to
specific for EAEC (Baudry et al., 1990). Based on this probe, a
be associated with EAEC are 18 and 30 kDa outer-
PCR assay was developed by Schmidt et al. in 1995. This assay
membrane adhesins (Chart et al., 1997; Debroy et al.,
has been widely used since then. In search for additional
1995; Grover et al., 2001). In addition, different pathogeni-
virulence factors, several other assays have been described,
city islands have been identified within the EAEC group,
none of which with has as high sensitivity and specificity as
including Shigella she pathogenicity island, containing
the one described in 1995. The problems in identification of
enterotoxin and mucinase genes (Henderson et al., 1999),
EAEC have been clearly highlighted very recently (Jenkins
and Yersinia high-pathogenicity island, containing the
et al., 2006b). The authors set up a multiplex PCR targeting
yersiniabactin siderophore gene (Schubert et al., 1998).
three different genes: (i) the anti-aggregation protein
Strains that carry the high molecular weight plasmid
transporter gene described by Baudry et al. (1990), (ii) the
represent an important subgroup (Cerna et al., 2003; Elias
EAST gene (Savarino et al., 1991) and (iii) a chromosomal
et al., 2002) and may be regarded as ‘typical EAEC’.
gene present in the pheU pathogenicity island designated
However, EAEC is a heterogeneous group of E. coli
aggR-activated island (Jenkins et al., 2006b). The authors used
(Czeczulin et al., 1999) and certain strains, although
this multiplex PCR to identify EAEC from patients in the
adherent to the HEp-2 cells in the stacked-brick mode,
community suffering from diarrhoea. They found that twice
lack the high molecular weight plasmid and can be called
as many isolates were positive against at least one of the
‘atypical EAEC’ (Cobeljic et al., 1996; Elias et al., 2002;
primers as compared to the HEp-2 adherence assay alone.
Gioppo et al., 2000; Itoh et al., 1997).

Identification – serotyping and molecular Conclusion


biology
The HEp-2-adherence assay and/or the CVD432 standard
However, none of the above-described gene(s) is conserved probe represent the best means at present for detecting EAEC.
among all of the EAEC and many are not unique to this However, it is clear that more sensitive, specific and practical
category of DEC. Recently, Jenkins et al. (2006a) used several methods are needed in order to improve the diagnosis of
different probes to characterize EAEC strains. The results infected cases with EAEC and to understand the disease.
show that the majority of the HEp-2 positive strains were also
positive for the anti-aggregation protein transporter gene
described by Baudry et al. (1990) against which Schmidt and
colleagues developed a PCR assay in 1995 (Schmidt et al., Note from the editor-in-chief
1995). Overall, 143 EAEC strains were analysed and 128 A review on EAEC by Huang and colleagues was published
(90 %) were positive for the anti-aggregation protein in the Journal of Medical Microbiology October 2006 issue
transporter gene (Jenkins et al., 2006a). However, 10 % of (Huang et al., 2006) that concentrated on the epidemiology
the strains verified by HEp-2 assay were negative in the PCR and pathogenic mechanisms of the bacterium. More
assay. This makes it difficult to provide a genotypic definition recently a paper by Jenkins and colleagues (Jenkins et al.,
for EAEC and to design specific molecular biological assays 2006b) has been published drawing attention to the
for the detection of this pathotype. In addition, serotyping of difficulties in diagnosing EAEC infection by molecular
EAEC is a problem. Due to their aggregative phenotype, methods. This mini review by Andrej Weintraub discusses
many of the strains auto-agglutinate and are often described the problem further.

6 Journal of Medical Microbiology 56


EAEC: epidemiology, virulence and detection

References Debroy, C., Yealy, J., Wilson, R. A., Bhan, M. K. & Kumar, R. (1995).
Antibodies raised against the outer membrane protein interrupt
Adachi, J. A., Jiang, Z. D., Mathewson, J. J., Verenkar, M. P., adherence of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 63,
Thompson, S., Martinez-Sandoval, F., Steffen, R., Ericsson, C. D. & 2873–2879.
DuPont, H. L. (2001). Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli as a major
Echeverria, P., Serichantalerg, O., Changchawalit, S., Baudry, B.,
etiologic agent in traveler’s diarrhea in 3 regions of the world. Clin
Levine, M. M., Orskov, F. & Orskov, I. (1992). Tissue culture-adherent
Infect Dis 32, 1706–1709.
Escherichia coli in infantile diarrhea. J Infect Dis 165, 141–143.
Baudry, B., Savarino, S. J., Vial, P., Kaper, J. B. & Levine, M. M.
Elias, W. P., Barros, S. F., Moreira, C. G., Trabulsi, L. R. & Gomes,
(1990). A sensitive and specific DNA probe to identify enteroag-
T. A. (2002). Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains among classical
gregative Escherichia coli, a recently discovered diarrheal pathogen.
enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O serogroups. J Clin Microbiol 40,
J Infect Dis 161, 1249–1251.
3540–3541.
Bernier, C., Gounon, P. & Le Bouguenec, C. (2002). Identification of
Eslava, C., Navarro-Garcia, F., Czeczulin, J. R., Henderson, I. R.,
an aggregative adhesion fimbria (AAF) type III-encoding operon in
Cravioto, A. & Nataro, J. P. (1998). Pet, an autotransporter
enteroaggregative Escherichia coli as a sensitive probe for detecting
enterotoxin from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Infect Immun
the AAF-encoding operon family. Infect Immun 70, 4302–4311. 66, 3155–3163.
Bhan, M. K., Bhandari, N., Sazawal, S., Clemens, J., Raj, P., Levine,
Ewing, W. H., Davis, B. R. & Montague, T. S. (1963). Studies on the
M. M. & Kaper, J. B. (1989a). Descriptive epidemiology of persistent
Occurence of Escherichia Coli Serotypes Associated with Diarrheal
diarrhoea among young children in rural northern India. Bull World Disease, pp. 1–38. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health, Education
Health Organ 67, 281–288. and Welfare, Public Health Service, CDC.
Bhan, M. K., Raj, P., Levine, M. M., Kaper, J. B., Bhandari, N., Fang, G. D., Lima, A. A., Martins, C. V., Nataro, J. P. & Guerrant, R. L.
Srivastava, R., Kumar, R. & Sazawal, S. (1989b). Enteroaggregative (1995). Etiology and epidemiology of persistent diarrhea in north-
Escherichia coli associated with persistent diarrhea in a cohort of eastern Brazil: a hospital-based, prospective, case-control study.
rural children in India. J Infect Dis 159, 1061–1064. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 21, 137–144.
Bhan, M. K., Sazawal, S., Raj, P., Bhandari, N., Kumar, R., Bhardwaj, Y., Food Standards Agency (2000). A Report of the Study of Infectious
Shrivastava, R. & Bhatnagar, S. (1989c). Aggregative Escherichia Intestinal Disease in England. London: The Stationery Office.
coli, Salmonella, and Shigella are associated with increasing duration of
Gascón, J., Vargas, M., Quinto, L., Corachan, M., Jimenez de Anta, M. T.
diarrhea. Indian J Pediatr 56, 81–86.
& Vila, J. (1998). Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains as a cause of
Bhatnagar, S., Bhan, M. K., Sommerfelt, H., Sazawal, S., Kumar, R. traveler’s diarrhea: a case-control study. J Infect Dis 177, 1409–1412.
& Saini, S. (1993). Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli may be a new
Gioppo, N. M., Elias, W. P., Jr, Vidotto, M. C., Linhares, R. E.,
pathogen causing acute and persistent diarrhea. Scand J Infect Dis 25,
Saridakis, H. O., Gomes, T. A., Trabulsi, L. R. & Pelayo, J. S. (2000).
579–583.
Prevalence of HEp-2 cell-adherent Escherichia coli and characterisa-
Boudailliez, B., Berquin, P., Mariani-Kurkdjian, P., Ilef, D., Cuvelier, B., tion of enteroaggregative E. coli and chain-like adherent E. coli
Capek, I., Tribout, B., Bingen, E. & Piussan, C. (1997). Possible isolated from children with and without diarrhoea, in Londrina,
person-to-person transmission of Escherichia coli O111-associated Brazil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 190, 293–298.
hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 11, 36–39.
Gomes, T. A., Blake, P. A. & Trabulsi, L. R. (1989). Prevalence of
Bouzari, S., Jafari, A., Farhoudi-Moghaddam, A. A., Shokouhi, F. & Escherichia coli strains with localized, diffuse, and aggregative
Parsi, M. (1994). Adherence of non-enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adherence to HeLa cells in infants with diarrhea and matched
to HeLa cells. J Med Microbiol 40, 95–97. controls. J Clin Microbiol 27, 266–269.
Cerna, J. F., Nataro, J. P. & Estrada-Garcia, T. (2003). Multiplex PCR Gonzalez, R., Diaz, C., Marino, M., Cloralt, R., Pequeneze, M. &
for detection of three plasmid-borne genes of enteroaggregative Perez-Schael, I. (1997). Age-specific prevalence of Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol 41, 2138–2140. with localized and aggregative adherence in Venezuelan infants with
Chan, K. N., Phillips, A. D., Knutton, S., Smith, H. R. & Walker-Smith, J. A. acute diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 35, 1103–1107.
(1994). Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli: another cause of acute and Grover, V., Ghosh, S., Sharma, N., Chakraborti, A., Majumdar, S. &
chronic diarrhoea in England? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 18, 87–91. Ganguly, N. K. (2001). Characterization of a galactose specific adhesin of
Chart, H., Spencer, J., Smith, H. R. & Rowe, B. (1997). Magnesium enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Arch Biochem Biophys 390, 109–118.
ions are required for HEp-2 cell adhesion by enteroaggregative Haider, K., Faruque, S. M., Albert, M. J., Nahar, S., Neogi, P. K. &
strains of Escherichia coli O126 : H27 and O44 : H18. FEMS Microbiol Hossain, A. (1992). Comparison of a modified adherence assay with
Lett 148, 49–52. existing assay methods for identification of enteroaggregative
Cobeljic, M., Miljkovic-Selimovic, B., Paunovic-Todosijevic, D., Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 30, 1614–1616.
Velickovic, Z., Lepsanovic, Z., Zec, N., Savic, D., Ilic, R., Henderson, I. R., Czeczulin, J., Eslava, C., Noriega, F. & Nataro, J. P.
Konstantinovic, S. & other authors (1996). Enteroaggregative (1999). Characterization of Pic, a secreted protease of Shigella flexneri
Escherichia coli associated with an outbreak of diarrhoea in a and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 67, 5587–5596.
neonatal nursery ward. Epidemiol Infect 117, 11–16. Hicks, S., Candy, D. C. & Phillips, A. D. (1996). Adhesion of
Cravioto, A., Gross, R. J., Scotland, S. M. & Rowe, B. (1979). An enteroaggregative Escherichia coli to pediatric intestinal mucosa in
adhesive factor found in strains of Escherichia coli belonging to the vitro. Infect Immun 64, 4751–4760.
traditional enteropathogenic serotypes. Curr Microbiol 3, 95–99. Huang, D. B., Mohanty, A., DuPont, H. L., Okhuysen, P. C. & Chiang, T.
Cravioto, A., Tello, A., Navarro, A., Ruiz, J., Villafan, H., Uribe, F. & (2006). A review of an emerging enteric pathogen: enteroaggregative
Eslava, C. (1991). Association of Escherichia coli HEp-2 adherence Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol 55, 1303–1311.
patterns with type and duration of diarrhoea. Lancet 337, 262–264. Huppertz, H. I., Rutkowski, S., Aleksic, S. & Karch, H. (1997). Acute
Czeczulin, J. R., Whittam, T. S., Henderson, I. R., Navarro-Garcia, F. and chronic diarrhoea and abdominal colic associated with
& Nataro, J. P. (1999). Phylogenetic analysis of enteroaggregative and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in young children living in western
diffusely adherent Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 67, 2692–2699. Europe. Lancet 349, 1660–1662.

http://jmm.sgmjournals.org 7
A. Weintraub

Itoh, Y., Nagano, I., Kunishima, M. & Ezaki, T. (1997). Laboratory Paul, M., Tsukamoto, T., Ghosh, A. R., Bhattacharya, S. K., Manna, B.,
investigation of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli O untypeable : H10 Chakrabarti, S., Nair, G. B., Sack, D. A., Sen, D. & Takeda, Y.
associated with a massive outbreak of gastrointestinal illness. J Clin (1994). The significance of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in the
Microbiol 35, 2546–2550. etiology of hospitalized diarrhoea in Calcutta, India and the
Jenkins, C., Chart, H., Willshaw, G. A., Cheasty, T. & Smith, H. R. demonstration of a new honey-combed pattern of aggregative
(2006a). Genotyping of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and adherence. FEMS Microbiol Lett 117, 319–325.
identification of target genes for the detection of both typical and Presterl, E., Nadrchal, R., Wolf, D., Rotter, M. & Hirschl, A. M. (1999).
atypical strains. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 55, 13–19. Enteroaggregative and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli among isolates
Jenkins, C., Tembo, M., Chart, H., Cheasty, T., Willshaw, G. A., from patients with diarrhea in Austria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
Phillips, A. D., Tompkins, D. & Smith, H. (2006b). Detection of 18, 209–212.
enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in faecal samples from patients in Rich, C., Favre-Bonte, S., Sapena, F., Joly, B. & Forestier, C. (1999).
the community with diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol 55, 1493–1497. Characterization of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli isolates. FEMS
Kaper, J. B., Nataro, J. P. & Mobley, H. L. (2004). Pathogenic Microbiol Lett 173, 55–61.
Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2, 123–140. Savarino, S. J., Fasano, A., Robertson, D. C. & Levine, M. M. (1991).
Knutton, S., Shaw, R., Phillips, A. D., Smith, H. R., Willshaw, G. A., Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli elaborate a heat-stable enterotoxin
Watson, P. & Price, E. (2001). Phenotypic and genetic analysis of
demonstrable in an in vitro rabbit intestinal model. J Clin Invest 87,
diarrhea-associated Escherichia coli isolated from children in the 1450–1455.
United Kingdom. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 33, 32–40. Schmidt, H., Knop, C., Franke, S., Aleksic, S., Heesemann, J. &
Karch, H. (1995). Development of PCR for screening of enteroag-
Law, D. & Chart, H. (1998). Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Appl
gregative Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 33, 701–705.
Microbiol 84, 685–697.
Schubert, S., Rakin, A., Karch, H., Carniel, E. & Heesemann, J.
Lima, A. A., Fang, G., Schorling, J. B., de Albuquerque, L., McAuliffe,
(1998). Prevalence of the ‘‘high-pathogenicity island’’ of Yersinia
J. F., Mota, S., Leite, R. & Guerrant, R. L. (1992). Persistent diarrhea
species among Escherichia coli strains that are pathogenic to humans.
in northeast Brazil: etiologies and interactions with malnutrition.
Infect Immun 66, 480–485.
Acta Paediatr Suppl 381, 39–44.
Schultsz, C., van den Ende, J., Cobelens, F., Vervoort, T.,
Mathewson, J. J., Johnson, P. C., DuPont, H. L., Morgan, D. R.,
van Gompel, A., Wetsteyn, J. C. & Dankert, J. (2000).
Thornton, S. A., Wood, L. V. & Ericsson, C. D. (1985). A newly
Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and acute and persistent diarrhea in
recognized cause of travelers’ diarrhea: enteroadherent Escherichia
returned travelers. J Clin Microbiol 38, 3550–3554.
coli. J Infect Dis 151, 471–475.
Sheikh, J., Czeczulin, J. R., Harrington, S., Hicks, S., Henderson,
Mathewson, J. J., Oberhelman, R. A., Dupont, H. L., Javier de la Cabada,
I. R., Le Bouguenec, C., Gounon, P., Phillips, A. & Nataro, J. P.
F. & Garibay, E. V. (1987). Enteroadherent Escherichia coli as a cause of
(2002). A novel dispersin protein in enteroaggregative Escherichia
diarrhea among children in Mexico. J Clin Microbiol 25, 1917–1919.
coli. J Clin Invest 110, 1329–1337.
Mayer, H. B. & Wanke, C. A. (1995). Enteroaggregative Escherichia
Smith, H. R., Cheasty, T. & Rowe, B. (1997). Enteroaggregative Escherichia
coli as a possible cause of diarrhea in an HIV-infected patient. N Engl
coli and outbreaks of gastroenteritis in UK. Lancet 350, 814–815.
J Med 332, 273–274.
Spencer, J., Smith, H. R. & Chart, H. (1999). Characterization of
Morabito, S., Karch, H., Mariani-Kurkdjian, P., Schmidt, H., Minelli, F.,
enteroaggregative Escherichia coli isolated from outbreaks of
Bingen, E. & Caprioli, A. (1998). Enteroaggregative, Shiga toxin-
diarrhoeal disease in England. Epidemiol Infect 123, 413–421.
producing Escherichia coli O111 : H2 associated with an outbreak of
hemolytic-uremic syndrome. J Clin Microbiol 36, 840–842. Svenungsson, B., Lagergren, A., Ekwall, E., Evengård, B., Hedlund,
K. O., Kärnell, A., Löfdahl, S., Svensson, L. & Weintraub, A. (2000).
Nataro, J. P. & Kaper, J. B. (1998). Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli.
Enteropathogens in adult patients with diarrhea and healthy control
Clin Microbiol Rev 11, 142–201. subjects: a 1-year prospective study in a Swedish clinic for infectious
Nataro, J. P., Kaper, J. B., Robins-Browne, R., Prado, V., Vial, P. & diseases. Clin Infect Dis 30, 770–778.
Levine, M. M. (1987). Patterns of adherence of diarrheagenic
Vial, P. A., Robins-Browne, R., Lior, H., Prado, V., Kaper, J. B.,
Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells. Pediatr Infect Dis J 6, 829–831. Nataro, J. P., Maneval, D., Elsayed, A. & Levine, M. M. (1988).
Nataro, J. P., Deng, Y., Maneval, D. R., German, A. L., Martin, W. C. & Characterization of enteroadherent-aggregative Escherichia coli, a
Levine, M. M. (1992). Aggregative adherence fimbriae I of enteroag- putative agent of diarrheal disease. J Infect Dis 158, 70–79.
gregative Escherichia coli mediate adherence to HEp-2 cells and Vial, P. A., Mathewson, J. J., DuPont, H. L., Guers, L. & Levine, M. M.
hemagglutination of human erythrocytes. Infect Immun 60, 2297–2304. (1990). Comparison of two assay methods for patterns of adherence
Nataro, J. P., Yikang, D., Yingkang, D. & Walker, K. (1994). AggR, a to HEp-2 cells of Escherichia coli from patients with diarrhea. J Clin
transcriptional activator of aggregative adherence fimbria I expres- Microbiol 28, 882–885.
sion in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 176, 4691–4699. Vu Nguyen, T., Le Van, P., Le Huy, C., Nguyen Gia, K. & Weintraub,
Nataro, J. P., Deng, Y., Cookson, S., Cravioto, A., Savarino, S. J., A. (2006). Etiology and epidemiology of diarrhea in children in
Guers, L. D., Levine, M. M. & Tacket, C. O. (1995). Heterogeneity of Hanoi, Vietnam. Int J Infect Dis 10, 298–308.
enteroaggregative Escherichia coli virulence demonstrated in volun- Wanke, C. A., Cronan, S., Goss, C., Chadee, K. & Guerrant, R. L. (1990).
teers. J Infect Dis 171, 465–468. Characterization of binding of Escherichia coli strains which are
Nataro, J. P., Steiner, T. & Guerrant, R. L. (1998). Enteroaggregative enteropathogens to small-bowel mucin. Infect Immun 58, 794–800.
Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis 4, 251–261. Wanke, C. A., Schorling, J. B., Barrett, L. J., Desouza, M. A. & Guerrant,
Pai, M., Kang, G., Ramakrishna, B. S., Venkataraman, A. & Muliyil, J. R. L. (1991). Potential role of adherence traits of Escherichia coli in
(1997). An epidemic of diarrhoea in South India caused by persistent diarrhea in an urban Brazilian slum. Pediatr Infect Dis J 10,
enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Indian J Med Res 106, 7–12. 746–751.

8 Journal of Medical Microbiology 56

You might also like