Exp 1 Flow
Exp 1 Flow
EXPERIMENT# 1
Objective:
To analyze the effect of proportional action on the automatic feedback flow control system.
• Control the value in the range of 4 lit/min to 18 lit/min, calculate the time constant, dead
time, and Kp, plot graph between time v/s process value, and plot graph between time
v/s controller outputs.
Instruments:
• Console
• Display unit
• Computer
• Turbine flow sensor (2-30 L/ min, working pressure: 14bar, Accuracy: +/- 3% of reading)
• Control unit
• Solenoid valve (Model: 2W-160-15, 5-80 oC, 0-7 kg/cm2)
• Motorized valve (Model: SR03GC22032A1-E, 24 AC, 50/60Hz, 3.5 VA)
• Pump (Padrollo Motor to flow water 220V/50Hz, 4L/min to 22L/min)
• Manual Valve
Theory:
In feedback control, the variable being controlled is measured and compared with a target
value. This difference between the actual and desired value is called the error. Feedback
control manipulates an input to the system to minimize this error. Figure. 10.1 shows an
overview of a basic feedback control loop. The error in the system would be the Output –
Desired Output. Feedback control reacts to the system and works to minimize this error. The
desired output is generally entered into the system through a user interface. The output of the
system is measured (by a flow meter, thermometer or similar instrument) and the difference is
calculated. This difference is used to control the system inputs to reduce the error in the
system. [Lee, Newell, and Cameron et. al]
flowing fluid imparts rotational energy to a turbine rotor, the angular velocity of which is
directly proportional to the fluid velocity. [Wan et.al]
f = K⋅Q
PI controller mode, proportional control mode provides a stabilizing influence while the
Integral mode will help to overcome OFFSET. Integral controller will provide corrective action as
long as there is a deviation in the controlled Variable from the set point value. [Richardson and
coulson et. al]
Flow control system, In a storage tank or other piece of equipment, flow control is typically
linked to inventory control. A reservoir is required to accommodate variations in flow rate. A
by-pass control would be used to offer flow control on a compressor or pump that is operating
at a fixed speed and producing an output that is almost constant in volume as shown in fig.1.1
[Richardson and coulson. Et. Al]
Fig. 1.2 (a) Flow control for a reciprocating pump (b) Alternative scheme for a centrifugal
compressor or pump
Dead Time (td) is the between the change in an input variable and when the output variable
begins. Dead time is important because it effects the controllability of the control system. A
change in set point is not immediate because of this parameter. Dead time must be considered
in tuning and modeling processes. [Leland, George and Arthur Rubenstein. Et. al]
Time Constant: The time constant of a system is the time required for the transient response to
reach 63.2% of its final steady-state value. [Leland, George and Arthur Rubenstein. Et. al]
Instrumentation and process control April 16, 2024
Methodology:
The Purpose of this experiment was to analyze the effect of proportional action on automatic
feedback flow control system.
Working Formula:
Time Constant Δτ = ti + 0.632 Δt
Proportional gain = Kp = ΔPV/ ΔCO
Observations:
Dead time = 8 sec
Table. 1.1: Experimental values based on flow control system at set point 4 lit/min
1 10 18 615
2 16 15 408
3 20 15 276
4 25 13 130
5 28 7 55
6 30 4 51
Calculation:
• Time constant:
Δτ = ti + 0.632 Δt
Δτ = 10+ 0.63 (30-10)
Δτ = 22.64 sec
• Proportional gain:
Kp = ΔPV/ΔC0
Kp = 14/564
Kp = 0.024
Instrumentation and process control April 16, 2024
20 700
18
615
18
600
16 15 15
14 13 500
408
12
400
CO
PV
10
276
7 300
8
6 200
130 4
4
55 51 100
2
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
TIME in sec
Fig. 1.4. Graphical representation of Time vs PV vs Controller output for table 1.1
Table 1.2: Experimental values based on flow control system at set point 18 lit/min
Dead time: 8 sec
Calculation:
Time constant:
Δτ = ti + 0.632 Δt
Δτ = 11+ 0.63 (58-11)
Δτ = 40.74 sec
Instrumentation and process control April 16, 2024
Proportional gain:
Kp = ΔPV/ΔC0
Kp = 14/1020
Kp = 0.013
20 1200
18 18
10201020 1020 10201020
17 1000
16
15
14
800
12
11
CO
PV
10 600
9
8
400
6
4
3 200
2
0 0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time in sec
Fig. 1.5: Graphical representation of Time vs PV vs Controller output for table 1.2
precise measurements over a wide range of flow rates makes it an ideal choice for this
experiment, ensuring accurate data for the PI controller to act upon.
References:
[1] Richardson and coulson introduction chemical engineering volume’3 and third Edition
[2] Wan, G., Wu, Y., Wu, C., Xiao, Y., Lin, J., & Zhang, S. (2023). Research progress and
challenges of the gas turbine flowmeter in energy measurement. Frontiers in Energy Research,
10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.977140
[3] Lee, Newell, and Cameron 1998: 6 FEEDBACK LOOP CONTROL SYSTEM (Peter Woolf et al.
University of Michigan)
[4] Leland Beckwith, George Lienhard, and Arthur Rubenstein Feedback Systems