MA3403 Lecture03
MA3403 Lecture03
The standard simplices are related by face maps for 0 ≤ i ≤ n which can be
described as
with the 0 inserted at the ith coordinate (t0 is the 0th coordinate).
1
2
Using the standard basis, φni can be described as the affine linear map (a
translation plus a linear map)
(
ej j<i
φni : ∆n−1 ,→ ∆n determined by φni (ej ) =
ej+1 j ≥ i.
A short way of expressing the above formula for φni is that it embedds ∆n−1
into ∆n by omitting the ith vertex (that is what the hat in the following formula
means):
φni = [e0 , . . . ,ei−1 ,b
ei ,ei+1 , . . . ,en ] : ∆n−1 → ∆n .
Definiton: Faces
Note that φni maps ∆n−1 onto the subsimplex opposite to the ith corner, or
in the standard basis, opposite to ei . We call the image of φni the ith face
of ∆n (which is opposite to ei ).
Note that the union of the images of all the face inclusions is the boundary
of ∆n .
The face maps satisfy a useful identity, sometimes called simplicial identity:
Since the collection of all face inclusions φni forms the boundary of ∆n , we can
use the maps dni to talk about the boundary of an n-simplex. The boundaries
of simplices will actually play a crucial role in the story.
We need to make this precise. First let us look at a simple example. Let X
be some space and σ : ∆1 → X be a 1-simplex in X. Assume σ(e0 ) = x0 6= x1 =
σ(e1 ). Then we would like to say that the boundary of σ is given by x0 and x1 .
Now let us assume that σ : ∆1 → X is another 1-simplex in X which forms a
closed loop, i.e., σ(e0 ) = σ(e1 ) = x ∈ X. Now we would like to say that σ has
no boundary (since it is a loop). Our face maps express σ(e0 ) = σ(e1 ) as
d10 (σ) = d11 (σ).
It would be nice if we had a short way to formulate that the boundary of σ
vanishes. For example, it would be nice if we were allowed to rewrite this equation
as
∂(σ) = d10 (σ) − d11 (σ) = 0.
But, so far, Sing0 (X) is just a set and we are not allowed to add or subtract
elements. We are now going to remedy this defect, since algebraic operations
make life much easier. Therefore, we formally extend Singn (X) into an abelian
group.
The general way to turn a set B into an abelian group, is to form the associated
free abelian group. The idea is to add the minimal amount of structure
and relations to turn B into an abelian group. Since this is an important
construction, we recall how this works:
Note: If n < 0, Singn (X) is defined to be empty and Sn (X) is the trivial
abelian group {0}. So whenever we talk about n-chains, n will be assumed to be
nonnegative.
Definition: Cycles
An n-cycle in X is an n-chain c ∈ Sn (X) with ∂n c = 0. We denote the
group of n-cycles by
Zn (X) := Ker (∂n : Sn (X) → Sn−1 (X))
= {c ∈ Sn (X) : ∂n (c) = 0} ⊆ Sn (X).
Note that the group of 0-cycles is all of S0 (X), since every 0-chain is mapped
to 0:
Z0 (X) = S0 (X).
As the notation suggests, we are going to think of a chain of the form ∂(c) as
the boundary of c:
7
Definition: Boundaries
An n-dimensional boundary in X is an n-chain c ∈ Sn (X) such that
there exists an (n + 1)-chain b with ∂n+1 b = c. We denote the group of
n-boudnaries by
Bn (X) := Im (∂n+1 : Sn (X) → Sn−1 (X))
= {c ∈ Sn (X) : there is a b ∈ Sn+1 (X) with ∂n+1 (b) = c}.
In general, we can think of the signs as giving the faces of the simplices
an orientation. And if an n-simplex is a face of an (n + 1)-simplex, then it
inherits an induced orientation which is determined by how it fits into the
bigger simplex. Going down two steps of inherited signs means things
cancel out.
However, thinking of signs as orientations is formally not correct as we will
notice in an example below. But, as we will see soon, we can algebraically
remedy this defect.
This basic resut shows that the sequence {Sn (X), ∂n }n has an important prop-
erty:
Hence we have shown that we obtain for any topological space X a complex of
(free) abelian groups
∂ n ∂ ∂n−1
2 1∂ 0 ∂ ∂
··· →
− Sn (X) −→ Sn−1 (X) −−−→ · · · −
→ S1 (X) −
→ S0 (X) −
→ 0.
9
It is called the singular chain complex of X. We will see next lecture what
such chain complexes are good for.