12physics Module 7 Guide
12physics Module 7 Guide
education.nsw.gov.au
Table of contents
Table of contents.......................................................................................................................................... 2
Teaching the year 12 modules..................................................................................................................... 3
Course overview.......................................................................................................................................... 3
Module summary.......................................................................................................................................... 5
Big ideas...................................................................................................................................................... 5
Evidence: discovery and justification....................................................................................................... 5
Science is interconnected........................................................................................................................ 6
Measurement........................................................................................................................................... 6
Relationships to other modules.................................................................................................................... 7
Core concepts.............................................................................................................................................. 7
The electromagnetic spectrum................................................................................................................. 7
Early models of light................................................................................................................................. 8
The quantum model of light...................................................................................................................... 9
Special relativity..................................................................................................................................... 10
Opportunities for extended concepts.......................................................................................................... 11
Exploring Maxwell’s equations............................................................................................................... 11
Where is all the antimatter?................................................................................................................... 11
How to take a photo of a black hole....................................................................................................... 12
Investigating polarisation....................................................................................................................... 12
Alternative conceptions and misconceptions.............................................................................................. 12
Symmetry in special relativity................................................................................................................. 12
Relativistic momentum........................................................................................................................... 13
Conceptual difficulties................................................................................................................................ 13
Light-years and electron volts................................................................................................................ 13
Suggested teaching strategies................................................................................................................... 14
Suggested order of topics...................................................................................................................... 14
Suggested investigations........................................................................................................................... 20
Appendices................................................................................................................................................ 21
Appendix one: Models of light................................................................................................................ 21
Appendix two: Sample question............................................................................................................. 21
Appendix three: The nature of light investigation handbook...................................................................25
Resources.................................................................................................................................................. 38
The Year 12 course provides avenues for students to apply the concepts they were
introduced to in Year 11 to motion in two dimensions, electromagnetism, theories of light,
the atom and the Universe.
Therefore, pedagogies that promote inquiry and deep learning should be employed in the
Physics classroom. The challenge presented by the additional content and the change in
pedagogical approach were the catalysts for the preparation of these module guides for
Stage 6. These guides are intended to assist teachers deliver Physics effectively by
outlining overarching concepts (big ideas), core and extended ideas, strategies for
teaching the modules, uncovering of alternative conceptions, and strategies to address
them. The guides support the teacher in facilitating the development of deep knowledge
structures, such as the relationships between concepts. The module guides do not cover
all aspects of the syllabus, as that was not within the scope of the project.
It is essential that teachers note that the module guides do not substitute the syllabus, but
only support teachers to teach it. The information contained in these documents are
correct at the time of publication. While every effort has been made to eliminate errors, any
errors or omission that are identified after the release of these documents will be corrected
and released as resource updates. It is recommended that teachers access the Curriculum
website for the latest version of these documents.
Course overview
The Year 11 course introduces fundamental concepts of motion, forces, fields, energy and
momentum. It provides opportunities for students to develop skills in Working Scientifically,
including skills related to the quantitative analysis and modelling of physical systems.
The Year 12 course further develops these concepts and applies them to the analysis of
phenomena and technologies that are relevant to society and to contemporary physics.
The Law of conservation of energy, along with the development of theories and models
form common themes across each of the modules. The role of scientific investigation and
evidence in advancing our understanding is explored in detail in Modules 7 and 8.
Inquiry questions are included in the course content and are used to frame the syllabus.
The depth of understanding required to fully address the inquiry questions may vary. This
allows for differentiation of the course content to cater for the diversity of learners.
Module summary
The theories and models about light have evolved over time; through general wave
behaviour, electromagnetic waves and quantum properties and these have set the
foundation for special relativity.
Big ideas
Evidence: discovery and justification
Along with Module 8, this module builds strong relationships between theories and models
and the experimental evidence that led to their discovery and subsequent acceptance. The
use of new evidence to make distinctions between competing theories is highlighted by the
models of light championed by Newton and Huygens. The nature of light is then further
challenged by new observations in the photoelectric effect.
Science is interconnected
Scientific theories do not exist in isolation, instead, they are better considered as making
up a ‘web of belief’. Core ideas are those that have survived numerous experimental tests
or those which have wide ranging links across the web. New observations may easily
challenge peripheral or not widely connected ideas such as the ether model for the
transmission of light. By contrast, core ideas such as the law of conservation of energy
have wide ranging application and importance and are often preserved by adjusting other
parts of the web if required. Chadwick’s discovery of the neutron, investigated in Module 8,
is just such an example of how a strong belief in conservation laws led to the proposal of a
previously unobserved particle.
Module 7 explores the dramatic consequences of disturbing the centre of this web.
Changes to our understanding of the behaviour of light, making the speed of light in a
vacuum an absolute constant, challenges our concepts of space, time and matter. It has
turned these quantities on their heads, for example, the speed of light, previously thought
to be relative to the motion of the observer, is now held as an absolute constant. To make
room for this to be true, space, time and matter must now be relative quantities affected by
the frame of reference of the observer. This change heralded the birth of Modern Physics
and has successfully predicted and been confirmed across wide ranging phenomena.
Measurement
The ability to make precise and accurate measurement is central to scientific inquiry.
Experimental observations may lead to the development of theories and laws and are
required in their validation. Beginning in 1799, with the deposition of platinum standards
representing the meter and kilogram in Paris, efforts have been made to create a single,
coherent system of measurements throughout the world. This led to the establishment of
the International System of Units (SI). Initial efforts relied on the production of artefacts to
represent fundamental units with all measurements being compared to these artefacts or
copies thereof. More recently, the demands for increased precision imposed by research
into phenomena on the smallest scales of time and space has driven the 2019 SI
redefinition. As of May 20, 2019, all SI base units will be defined in terms of seven
fundamental constants, with each constant assigned an exact numerical value in the
Many of the historical efforts measure the speed of light using the displacement-time
s
relationship, v= , were plagued by errors. These stemmed from the high speed of light,
t
the inability to observe its travel over large distances and the lack of technology to
precisely measure small increments of time. The wave nature of light provides an alternate
method of measuring its speed. By creating standing waves and applying the wave
equation, , ν=fλ , the accuracy of measurements of the velocity of light is instead
dependent on measurements of distance and the frequency of radiation used. Students
are guided through several key efforts to measure the speed of light and should consider
how each attempted to improve accuracy by overcoming some of these issues or by
exploiting the wave nature of light.
The role of new technologies and inventive methodologies for measurement are further
explored in relation to the photoelectric effect and in validating predictions made by special
relativity.
In Module 6, students explore the SI definition of the ampere at nsit.gov. While the 2017
syllabus, (IQ6-2) refers to a superseded definition of the ampere, investigating recent
revisions in the standards of measurement is an opportunity to familiarise students with
issues in the measurement of time and distance included in this module.
Core concepts
The electromagnetic spectrum
Maxwell’s contribution to the classical theory of electromagnetism was in the unification of
the then separate theories of electricity and magnetism, creating a single system of four
From his equations, Maxwell was able to show that electromagnetic fields could travel as
self-propagating waves, allowing them to propagate in a vacuum. His equations predicted
that there was a spectrum of electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies and
1
wavelengths but with an absolute speed given by the expression c= a fact that would
√ μ0 ε 0
later challenge the principle of relativity by seemingly providing an avenue to determine
absolute motion without the need for an external frame of reference.
Historical and contemporary methods to measure the speed of light are investigated in this
module. Notable historical examples that could be investigated include:
Galileo, using shuttered lanterns
Roemer, studying eclipse patterns of Jupiter’s moons
Fizeau, using a rotating toothed wheel and mirror
Michelson, using an octagonal mirror
It would be reasonable to only cover in detail, the efforts of Roemer and Fizeau as they
demonstrate methods of improving accuracy of measurements, compared to Galileo’s
lanterns by increasing the distance light travels and by improving the precision of time
measurements respectively.
Modern methods generally exploit the wave properties of light and rely on the ability to
produce lasers of a known and stable frequency, along with the ability to measure their
wavelength accurately. These methods highlighted the 1960 definition of the meter as the
limiting factor in the uncertainty around the speed of light. This led ultimately to the
redefinition of the meter in 1983 to be “the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum
during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second”. Therefore, the speed of light was
assigned a fixed and exact value as detailed in Speed of Light From Direct Frequency and
Wavelength Measurements, from the Journal of Research of the NIST
Studies of the spectra emitted by stars have yielded insights into their composition and
other properties. This is further explored in Module 8.
Within this module, this topic is the best opportunity to conduct practical investigations,
with opportunities to demonstrate the wave nature of light using diffraction and polarisation
experiments.
The photoelectric effect describes the emission of electrons from a metal surface when it is
irradiated with radiation of a sufficiently high frequency. The emitted electrons are called
‘photoelectrons’ and their emission results in the production of a ‘photocurrent’. The key
observations leading to the development of a quantum model of light were:
1. The existence of a threshold frequency, f 0, where only frequencies above this
threshold will produce a photocurrent, regardless of intensity. The threshold
frequency is dependent on the metal surface.
2. The energy of photoelectrons is independent of the intensity of the light source.
3. The magnitude of the photocurrent is proportional to the intensity of the light source.
The first two of the above observations could not be accounted for by the electromagnetic
wave theory of light. A quantum model of light can explain all three observations. The
basic postulates of this model are:
1. Electromagnetic waves consist of discrete, massless units called photons. A photon
travels in vacuum at the speed of light, c=3.00 × 108 m s−1
2. Each photon has an energy proportional to its frequency. E photon=hf , where f is the
frequency of the wave and h is a universal constant called Planck’s constant. The
value of Planck’s constant is h=6.626 ×10−34 Js. In other words, electromagnetic
waves consist of discrete ‘chunks’ of energy.
When applied to the photoelectric effect, this model predicts the maximum kinetic energy
of photoelectrons and is represented mathematically by:
Whereϕ is the work function of the given metal surface. The threshold frequency, f 0, is
defined by h f 0=ϕ as this leads to photoelectrons with zero kinetic energy. For frequencies
higher than the threshold frequencies, the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons is
equal to the difference between the photon energy and the work function.
Special relativity
Scientific evidence and its role in developing and validating theories is explored in this
topic. It should be noted when analysing and evaluating the evidence confirming or
denying Einstein’s two postulates of special relativity (SR), that it is not an expectation that
students provide evidence that denies either postulate. However, it is expected that
evidence relating to each postulate is analysed.
Galileo’s thought experiment illustrates how evidence could be collected to support what
was later known as the Principle of Relativity. In the early seventeenth century, the popular
view of our solar system was that the Earth was stationary at its centre because we did not
observe any of the expected effects of racing through space at very high speeds. Galileo
used his ship as a model for the Earth in order to demonstrate that it is impossible to
detect the motion of the Earth using observations within its inertial frame. That is,
experiments conducted on a ship at rest, or moving at constant velocity, would produce
identical results. This would make it impossible to use experiments of motion, or any other
experiments, to distinguish between the two inertial frames.
Maxwell’s prediction of a constant speed for light, albeit very high, provided a potential
experimental method for distinguishing between inertial frames. By measuring the speed
of light in an inertial frame and comparing it to the predicted speed, one could determine
their absolute motion.
Einstein’s second postulate states that all inertial frames of reference are equivalent. This
extends the equivalence of physical laws in inertial frames of reference to include not just
Newton’s laws of motion, but all physical laws particularly those relating to electromagnetic
phenomena. Thus, the Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) could be considered to
provide evidence for both postulates.
Einstein predicted phenomena, including time dilation and length contraction, would occur
as a logical consequence of the two postulates for SR. He demonstrated these through a
range of thought experiments at a time when technological limitations made it practically
impossible to observe the phenomena experimentally. Suitable thought experiments for
time dilation and length contraction involve the use of a ‘light clock’ placed inside a train
carriage that is moving at a constant velocity relative to an observer on the platform of a
train station. The orientation of the light clock relative to the motion (either perpendicular or
parallel) allows the respective phenomena to be investigated.
Other predictions arising from SR are included in this topic (relativistic momentum and
mass-energy equivalence), however, students are not required to analyse evidence that
supports them. Instead, they are required to draw out some of their observed practical
consequences and applications.
Cosmological models describing the transformation of radiation into matter following the
‘Big Bang’ predict that the Universe should contain equal quantities of matter and
antimatter.
Consider applying E=m c2to the transformation of radiation to matter, for example an
electron. If a photon (neutral charge) were to transform into an electron (negatively
charged), it would violate the law of conservation of charge.
Instead, the process occurs through ‘pair-production’. That is, a photon (or another
neutrally charged boson) transforms by creating a particle-antiparticle pair. In this
case, the photon transforms to produce an electron and its antiparticle, a positron.
Each has equal and opposite charge ensuring that conservation of charge is upheld.
This is true for all such transformations, so we could rewrite the initial equation as
where m is the symbol for antimatter. We have not yet found (or are likely to find) any
significant amounts of antimatter in our galaxy or in any other observable galaxy. One
possible explanation for the observed imbalance of matter and antimatter is that their
properties may not be precisely symmetric, for example they may each interact differently
with gravity. This possibility is currently being investigated by researchers at the Antimatter
factory at CERN as described in Entering the Antimatter Factory at CERN by New
Scientist Magazine.
Pair production in bubble chambers is also a key piece of evidence for the existence of
particles other than protons, neutrons and electrons, which is explored further in Module 8.
Further explanation of this momentous event can be found at How to understand the black
hole image (duration 9:18) by Veritasium and How scientists captured the first image of a
black hole at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
Investigating polarisation
When investigating polarisation, students could test a range of alternative light sources
including polarised and unpolarised light. Modelling light using the components of its
electric field can be used to explain linear and circular polarisation. The following videos
may provide a useful introduction.
Circular polarisation (duration 4:39) at UCLAphysicsvideo -using a physical model
and demonstrations
Polarisation of light (duration 19:50) 3D animations explaining circularly polarised,
linearly polarised and unpolarised light
Circular polarisation (duration 1:36) - animations of the components of the electric
field
The concept of ‘actual time’ is based on the notion that there is a preferred or universal
inertial frame to which all time and space measurements can be compared. This of course,
is addressed in Einstein’s second postulate “all inertial frames of reference are equivalent”.
Special relativity requires us to give up on time and space as absolute quantities, but it
allows us to accurately determine how these values are transformed when viewed from a
different inertial frame of reference. In many ways, it validates any inertial frame of
reference as a suitable place to investigate the laws of physics.
Relativistic momentum
The 2017 changes to the Stage 6 Physics syllabus have removed the formula for
calculating mass dilation and replaced it with the associated concept of relativistic
momentum. This change is welcomed because in Special Relativity the mass is invariant,
a quantity that never changes. Instead, as an object approaches the speed of light, it is its
momentum that approaches infinity from the perspective of a stationary observer.
Conceptual difficulties
The topic is very abstract and requires the preunderstanding of wave properties including
refraction and superposition. Students require a high level of mathematical competence to
Additionally, problem solving in the Special relativity topic will often require students to
recognise light-years (ly) as a unit of distance where
Fortunately, it is not generally expected that students make conversions between light-
years and other units of measurement.
Modules 7 and 8 share concepts in quantum physics and Module 8, IQ8-3 Quantum
Mechanical Nature of Atom can be brought forward and taught with Module 7, IQ7-3 Light:
quantum model. As Module 8 has five topics, this may reduce the pressure experienced
towards the end of Year 12.
Student understanding of the role that historical evidence played in the changing models of
light can be supported by student investigation. A range of sample investigations are
outlined in the Nature of light investigation handbook which is included in the appendix. It
outlines opportunities for students to conduct investigations using first-hand and simulated
data. Skills addressed in these learning activities include conducting investigations,
processing and analysing primary and secondary data, and communicating ideas to a
general audience.
Models of light
The Olympus webpage, Light: Particle or a wave? provides a detailed introduction to the
debate over the nature of light, highlighting the division between the models proposed by
Newton and Huygens in the early Eighteenth Century. A sample student activity based on
this resource can be found in the appendix.
Diffraction
The diffraction of light can be demonstrated using purpose-built single and double slit
slides, diffraction gratings, or even using a CD. Comparing the diffraction patterns
produced from a collimated source such as a discharge tube to that from a monochromatic
source like a laser could be a useful starting point for discussions of diffraction. It should
be noted that the distance to the respective maxima is proportional to the wavelength, with
red appearing on the outside of the diffraction pattern.
Polarisation
Students can conduct first-hand practical investigations to verify Malus’s Law. Light meters
on mobile phones along with small sheets of polarised film with protractors pinned in the
middle could be used to collect data to verify Malus’s Law. It is an opportunity for students
develop skills in planning investigations and problem solving.
Students could be assigned the task of collecting evidence to verify Malus’s Law. After
plotting their initial data for intensity versus analyser angle, students should identify the
need for increased sampling resolution around the points of maximum intensity in order to
verify the sinusoidal nature of the relationship. More advanced students could be guided in
manipulating variables to produce and linear relationship.
Electromagnetic Spectrum
Maxwell’s equations
Maxwell’s equations represented the unification of our models of electric and magnetic
phenomena into an overarching theory of electromagnetism. His work not only explained
existing phenomena using a common language and mathematical framework, it provided
new insights into the nature and behaviour of light.
Whilst the mathematics of the four equations is beyond the scope of this course, students
can be encouraged to understand the physical significance of each equation. Using
worded descriptions of each and associating each with a diagram will provide a suitable
depth of understanding for most students. An example of suitable descriptions can be
found on Lumen learning and Fields: Activity 3, from the Perimeter Institute (see
resources).
Subsequent methods, including those used by Roemer, Foucault and Fitzeau could then
be analysed in terms of:
improvements in technologies used to accurately measure distance and time
increasing accuracy compared to the accepted value for the speed of light, and in
some cases
the exploitation of lights wave-like properties for interferometry or the formation of
standing waves.
A sample question, marking guidelines and sample response are included in the appendix
and could be set as a research assignment or as revision. Further reading on these and
other methods is available from Las Cumbres Observatory, PHYSCLIPS and the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Spectroscopy
Handheld spectroscopes allow students to clearly observe the spectra from a variety of
sources. Observing reflected sunlight and incandescent filaments (and changing the
supplied voltage) allows students to qualitatively explore the relationship between surface
temperature and the spectrum produced.
Analysing the spectrum of a star to gather information about its properties generally
requires students to identify key features of each spectra and correctly link them to
inferences about the star’s properties. Features include:
the peak wavelength
patterns of absorption lines
doppler shifting and broadening of spectral lines
Activity 2: The signature of the stars produced by the Perimeter Institute, includes a rich
set of data driven activities for students to explore the information contained in the light
from stars. Students will be guided through the analysis and display of spectral plots and
develop an understanding of the evidence for an expanding Universe provided by the
Extension
A star analyser (typically costing around $250), combined with a telescope or DLSR
camera can be used to capture and analyse the spectra of stars in the night sky. Detailed
spectra can then be quickly processed and analysed using free software.
Observations of black body radiation could not be explained using Maxwell’s classical
electromagnetic theory. Students should appreciate that attempts to explain and predict
the shape of the black body radiation curve observed for hot objects were unable to
completely match the experimental observations. Attempts to explain the spectrum,
including Wien’s theory, which was only accurate at short wavelengths and deviated at
longer wavelengths, whilst the Rayleigh-Jeans theory suffered from the opposite problem.
The ultraviolet catastrophe predicted by the Rayleigh-Jeans theory serves as a clear
example to students of the failure of classical theories to explain black body radiation.
Planck proposed an empirical formula (that is, a formula that is supported by experimental
observations but not necessarily supported by theory). The details of his formula are
beyond the scope of this course, however the success of his formula in describing the
black body spectrum led him to make a bold suggestion that changed the direction of
scientific thinking.
He proposed that the energy distributed among the oscillations of atoms within molecules
(which were thought to be the source of the radiation) was not continuous but instead
consist of a finite number of tiny discrete amounts each related to the frequency of
oscillation. His proposal suggested that the energy of any oscillation could only take on a
whole number multiple of some small value, hf , or;
E=nhf
Where h is Planck’s constant ¿ 6.626 ×10−34 Js , f is the frequency, and n=1 ,2 , 3 ,….
Consider using analogies to reinforce the distinction between the continuous and discrete
natures of the respective classical and quantum models of energy. The Cosmos magazine
article, Quantum physics for the terminally confused (accessed 02/04/2020) outlines some
Photoelectric effect
Definitions and correct terminology relating to the photoelectric effect are outlined in the
core concepts section of this module guide. Explicitly introducing this terminology will
support students in creating concise explanations relating to the photoelectric effect.
Students will apply their knowledge of the behaviour of charged particles in electric fields
to understand how the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons is measured.
Paul Hewitt has recorded a series of explanatory videos for physics students, his collection
of Hewitt Drew-It! videos on the Special theory of relativity use diagrams and examples to
introduce this topic including time dilation and length contraction.
Visual physics online’s discussion of evidence for time dilation and length contraction
outlines relevant evidence at a level of depth appropriate for Year 12 students.
Investigating the mass-energy equivalence, E=m c2, can be used to build connections with
concepts in Module 8. Consider using examples that relate to Module 8 content such as
the transformation of radiation into matter via pair-production (for example, electron-
positron production) and the release of energy from hydrogen fusion in stars. Quantitative
analysis of these processes can support questioning and problem solving such as
estimating stellar lifetimes and will be applied later when studying the properties of the
nucleus topic.
Suggested investigations
A range of suggested investigations for this module, beyond those described in the
teaching strategies have been compiled in the Nature of light investigation handbook,
which has been included as an appendix to this guide.
Refraction
Reflection
Diffraction, including
Young’s double slit
experiment
Polarisation
Photoelectric effect
(optional at this stage)
Marking criteria
Criteria Mark
Sample answer
Errors and uncertainty can limit the accuracy of measurements made in first-hand
investigations. The magnitude of the quantities to be measured, coupled with the
technologies used to measure them will affect the accuracy of the results obtained in an
investigation.
When attempting to measure the speed of light, accuracy can be judged by the extent to
which the measured value for the speed of light agrees with its true value (c=3 × 108 m s−1).
In his experiment, intense light was shone at a mirror 8 km away. The light beam was
broken up by a rotating cog, as shown above. The speed of rotation was adjusted until the
reflected light been could no longer be seen returning through the gaps between the teeth
of the cogs. At this point, the cog will have rotated through exactly the angle required for a
tooth to block the part of the returning light in the time it took to travel the 16 km round trip
to the mirror and back.
The rotating cog is the technology used to make precise measurements of time with
relatively low uncertainty. Placing the mirror 8 km away increases the time the light takes
to travel. Together, this reduces the relative error in the time measurement and supports a
reasonably accurate measurement of the speed of light. He measured c≈≈ 3.13 ×108 ms−1,
which is within 5% of its true value.
Hertz measured the speed of radio waves (predicted by Maxwell as part of the EM
spectrum that includes light and travels at speed, c, in a vacuum). He created a standing
wave by reflecting radio waves back towards the transmitter, as shown in the diagram. The
distance between adjacent anti-nodes was measured using a ring with a small gap across
which a spark would jump. This distance was equal to ½ the wavelength. The frequency of
waves could not be directly measured and was instead calculated from the transmitter
circuit details. By applying the wave equation, the velocity could then be determined.
The static nature of the node-antinode pattern removed the need to make measurements
at short time intervals, which plagued earlier efforts. Random errors in distance
measurements for determining the wavelength could be minimised by recording the
distance between a larger number of successive anti-nodes and dividing the result
accordingly. His measurement for the speed of radio waves (and therefore light) was
highly accurate and supported Maxwell’s earlier predictions.
Equipment required
Investigation one: measuring the speed of light
microwave
ruler
bar of chocolate
calculator
Method
Investigation one: measuring the speed of light
All you need to do this experiment is a microwave, ruler, bar of chocolate and a calculator.
You could also use cheese, marshmallows, or choc drops. Remember to check for food
allergies. Adapted from Shadwick, B., 2020. Surfing NSW Physics Modules 5 & 6: Brian
Shadwick: 9780855837068.
Aim
Background knowledge
Check the service plate on the back of the microwave for the frequency used and adjust
your calculations accordingly
v=fλ
Where:
8 −1
v=3 ×10 m s
Be familiar with Galileo’s experiment of first trying to measure the speed of light and
Roemer who proved that light travels at a finite speed. You could reproduce Galileo’s
experiment in a dark room with torches.
This investigation exploits the wave properties of light to measure its velocity. In this way, it
is like the method employed by Heinrich Hertz in measuring the speed of radio waves.
When waves are reflected back towards their source, the waves interfere to create
standing waves with alternating nodes (positions of zero displacement) and antinodes
(positions which vibrate between maximum positive and negative displacements). The
distance between any two consecutive antinodes, or nodes, is equal to half the wavelength
of component waves.
Draw a diagram of a standing wave pattern in the space below. Label the nodes and
antinodes along with a wavelength.
Method
1. Remove turntable from microwave. The chocolate must be stationary when heated.
2. Put a plate upside down over the rotor to ensure chocolate remains stationary.
3. Place a bar of chocolate upside down, ensuring the middle of the chocolate is as
close as possible to the centre of the microwave.
4. Set the timer for 30 seconds. Note: This is too long, but you can open manually to
stop.
5. Start the microwave and heat chocolate until it starts to melt in two or three places-
usually around 20 seconds.
6. Open the door as soon as you see the melted hot spots form on the chocolate
7. Carefully take the chocolate out of the microwave.
Results
apply the formula v=fλ , and your measured wavelength to determine the speed of
microwaves
compare your answers to the accepted value (3.00 ×10 8 m s−1)
calculate your percentage error in your experiment from
[ measured value ] −[accepted value ] 100
% Error= ×
[accepted value] 1
write a brief discussion of your results including suggestions of how you could
improve the accuracy of the investigation.
Aim
Background knowledge
When the light enters the tube, its spectrum is spread out perpendicular to the CD tracks.
Therefore, the slit and the viewing hole are located at right angles. Each component is
diffracted according to its wavelength which spreads out the colours. For you to see the
spectrum, the light must diffract off the CD and be directed at your eye. Adjusting the tilt of
the CD allows you to align the spectrum so that it can be viewed.
Cutting tools
Method
1. Print the cutting guide and wrap it around your tube. If needed, you can scale the
guide to ensure it wraps around your tube without a gap or overlap.
2. Use a saw to cut the tube at an angle along the curved line on the cutting guide. The
cut will make the CD tilt at an angle approximately 30 degrees from the end of the
tube.
3. Use a razor knife or box-cutter to cut the rectangular viewing hole—the black square
on the cutting guide. You can remove the cutting guide now.
4. Next, cut a clean slit less than 1 mm wide and 5 cm long in one of pieces of flat
cardboard (or plastic tube cap). Tape the flat cardboard onto the end of the tube
furthest from the CD—the top of the tube. Hold the tube as shown below and align
the slit horizontally.
5. Tape the second flat piece of cardboard (or plastic tube cap) over the bottom end of
the tube, behind the CD, to exclude any stray light.
6. Insert the CD into the CD slot, so that it reflects the light coming through the top slit
into your eye.
7. Hold the tube upright and point the top slit at a fluorescent light and press your eye
to the viewing hole.
8. On the CD, look for a clear, solid line of light broken up into coloured bands: this is
the spectrum of light reflected from fluorescent light onto the CD.
You may need to adjust the angle at which you look through the viewing hole at the CD to
find the best view of the light spectrum. Notice that the fluorescent light produces bright
lines. The bright lines are the spectrum of mercury gas inside the tube. An incandescent
light, by comparison, makes a continuous spectrum.
Note: consider trying to photograph the spectrum using a smartphone if you have one
available. This will allow you to describe, analyse and compare spectra without the need to
Results
Sketch the spectra produced by a range of light sources, labelling any key features,
similarities or differences.
Use the internet to find a picture of the emission spectra of common elements, that
is, bright line spectra. Then try and identify the elements present in the spectra of
the discharge tube you observed.
Create a table to organise and share your results.
Aim
Use the PhET black body simulation to reproduce a blackbody radiation curve for a range
of temperatures.
Background knowledge
The visible part of the spectrum contains electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths
ranging from 400 nm (violet) to 700 nm (red).
Wien’s Law;
b
λ max=
T
describes the relationship between the temperature, T, of an object and the peak
wavelength (the wavelength with the highest intensity), λ max. For hotter objects, the peak
wavelength occurs at a shorter wavelength. The constant, b, known as Wien’s
displacement constant, has a value of 2.898 ×10−3 m K .
Method
Results
Section one
1. Does the light globe produce X-rays? Explain your answer.
Section two
1. Compare the spectrum produced by the light bulb to that produced by the oven?
2. Compare the most intense wavelength (peak wavelength) produced by the light
globe to the most intense produced by the sun.
3. Explain the relationship you see between the radiation emitted by the sun and the
visible spectrum.
4. Is there evidence from the black body curve that the sun is producing ultraviolet
radiation? Explain your answer.
Section three
Note - you cannot fill in the 3rd column until after you have graphed your data
1 −4 −1
Temperature (K) Peak wavelength ¿) (×10 K )
T
500 20
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1. Plot a graph of wavelength against temperature on the grid below. Make sure your
axis starts at (0,0) and place temperature (the independent variable in our
investigation) on the x-axis.
T =500
1 1 −4 −1
= =0.002=20× 10 K
T 500
Now redraw your graph with 1/T on the x-axis using the following grid.
Aim
Observe the change in direction of the travel of waves as they pass through an opening.
Background knowledge
Simply stated, Huygen’s (pronounced HOY-guns) model of light is based on the proposal
that:
Each point of a wavefront acts as a source of secondary wavelets that expand forward
from that point.
Huygen’s model of light video (duration 6:42) successfully explains reflection, refraction
and diffraction.
The width of the central band is double the width of the band on either side of it. The
intensity of the maxima, that is the brightness, diminishes quickly with increased distance
from the centre of the screen. As the width of the slit is reduced the diffraction effect is
increased. This means that the bands are spread further apart as the width of the slit
decreases.
Laser pointer Laser light can cause serious Keep laser at waist height to
eye damage prevent stray light entering
eyes
Post a warning sign on each
entrance to laboratory
Method
Note: As an alternative to this investigation watch the video Laser diffraction and
interference (duration 2:25) taking notes and sketching the different diffraction patterns
produced.
Attach a red laser pointer (less than 1 mW) to a retort stand to hold the laser steady.
Use narrow slit, your school may have these or you can make one. Sticky tape two
pencils together with one of the pencils having a few extra layers of sticky tape
placed over one end. This should make a very narrow gap through which the laser
light can be passed.
A dark room.
A screen to make observations, this could be a sheet of graph paper stuck on the
wall.
Sticky tape to keep the laser switched on.
Measure the width of the central fringe.
Next change the width of the slit and observe how this changes the diffraction
pattern
Results
If you need reassurance that you are observing a diffraction pattern, then search the
internet for images of single slit diffraction and compare them your observations.
Aim
Background knowledge
The waves that interfere with each other can be considered as both constructively and
destructively. Constructive interference lines produce bright bands and are also known as
anti-nodal lines. Whilst destructive interference produces dark bands and are also known
as nodal lines. When the light passing through the narrow slits strikes a screen, a
distinctive diffraction pattern of light and dark bands is observed. The position of the bright
bands on the screen can be determined using the following equation.
d sin θ=mλ
For further details on Young’s double slit experiment and on applying the above equation,
OpenStax College and sample problems with answers can be found on the Physics
Classroom.
Laser pointer Laser light can cause serious Keep laser at waist height to
eye damage prevent stray light entering
eyes
Method
Note: The room may need to be very dark in order to clearly observe the interference
pattern.
Results
Construct a table of your results, along with a diagram showing how your equipment was
setup.
This website offers a comprehensive range of pdf’s that are tailored to support the Stage 6
Physics course in NSW. Each resource includes clear explanations, activities and makes
good use of diagrams to support understanding. Most resources also included
differentiated levels of explanation that can be tailored to suit the needs of your students.
PHYSCLIPS Light
This site has a range of animations and recorded practical demonstrations to support
concepts covered in module 7. This includes a detailed demonstration of a modern method
for measuring the speed of light using a laser, a beam splitter and a CRO.
compadre.org/physlets
Each of the resources provided by the Perimeter Institute includes a video, lesson notes,
classroom worksheets and assessments with worked responses. They can be downloaded
for free from the Perimeter Institute website after registering for a free account. They have
an extensive collection of resources available to support learning and teaching of concepts
relevant to the Stage 6 Physics course. Specific examples relevant to this module are
listed below.
Fields The resource contains a set of five activities. Activity 3: Maxwell’s equations,
explores the significance of each equation and scaffolds student understanding
through questioning, diagrams and hands-on activities.
The expanding Universe Activity 2: The signature of the stars contains data driven
activities for students to explore the information contained in the light from stars.
Students will be guided through the analysis and display of spectral plots and
develop an understanding of the evidence for an expanding Universe provided by
the spectra of distant galaxies and Type 1a supernovas.