Modified Pts With Fecs For Papr Reduction in Mimo-Ofdm System With Different Subcarriers
Modified Pts With Fecs For Papr Reduction in Mimo-Ofdm System With Different Subcarriers
Modified Pts With Fecs For Papr Reduction in Mimo-Ofdm System With Different Subcarriers
=
=
, 0 t T s s
(1)
where T is the symbol interval, and
0
f
=1/T is the
frequency spacing between adjacent subcarriers.
Replacing t=n
b
T , where
b
T =T/N, gives the discrete
time version denoted by
1
2 /
0
1
( )
N
j kn LN
k
k
x n X e
N
t
=
=
, n=0,1,NL-1
(2)
where, L is the oversampling factor. The symbol-
spaced sampling sometimes misses some of the
signal peaks and results in optimistic results for the
PAPR. The sampling can be implemented by an
IFFT.
The PAPR of the transmitted OFDM signal, x(t), is
then given as the ratio of the peak instantaneous
power to the average power, written as
( )
2
0
2
max ( )
t T
x t
PAPR
E x t
s s
=
(
(3)
where E[] is the expectation operator.
From the central limit theorem, for large values of N,
the real and imaginary values of ( ) x t becomes
Gaussian distributed. The amplitude of the OFDM
signal, therefore, has a Rayleigh distribution with
zero mean and a variance of N times the variance of
one complex sinusoid. The complementary
cumulative distribution function (CCDF) is the
probability that the PAPR of an OFDM symbol
exceeds the certain threshold PAPR
0
, which can be
expressed as
0
( ( ( ))) P ( ( ( )))
r
CCDF PAPR x n PAPR x n PAPR = >
(4)
Due to the independence of the N samples, the CCDF
of the PAPR of SISO-OFDM as a data block with
Nyquist rate sampling is given by
0
0
P ( ( ( )) ) 1 (1 )
PAPR N
r
P PAPR x n PAPR e
= > =
(5)
This expression assumes that the N time domain
signal samples are mutually independent and
uncorrelated and it is not accurate for a small number
of subcarriers. Therefore, there have been many
attempts to derive more accurate distribution of
PAPR.
For a MIMO-OFDM system, analysis of the PAPR
performance is the same as the SISO case on each
single antenna. For the entire system, the PAPR is
defined as the maximum of PAPRs among all
transmit antennas [9], i.e.,
1
max
t
MIMO OFDM i
i M
PAPR PAPR
s s
=
(6)
where,
i
PAPR
denotes the PAPR at the i
th
transmit
antenna. Specifically, since in MIMO-OFDM, M
t
N
time domain samples are considered compared to N
in SISO-OFDM, the CCDF of the PAPR in MIMO-
OFDM can be written as
0
0
( ) 1 (1 )
t
PAPR M N
r MIMO OFDM
P PAPR PAPR e
> =
(7)
Comparing (7) with (5), it is evident that MIMO-
OFDM results in even worse PAPR performance than
SISO-OFDM.
3. GOLAY SEQUENCES AND REED- MULLER
CODE
3.1 Coding Theory
The binary complementary sequences were proposed
by M.J.E. Golay in 1961 [10]. The complementary
sequences are sequences pairs for which the sum of
aperiodic autocorrelation functions is zero for all
delay shifts. It was mentioned in [11] that the
autocorrelation properties of complementary
sequences can be used to construct the OFDM signal
with low PAPR.
3.2 Complementary Sequence Theory
The pair of sequence x and y of length N, ie.,
| |
0 1 2 1
, , ,....
N
x x x x x
=
and
| |
0 1 2 1
, , ,....
N
y y y y y
= ,
are said to be complementary if the following
condition hold on the sum of both autocorrelation
functions:
1
0
( ) 2 ;
N
k k i k k i
k
x x y y N
+ +
=
+ =
0 i =
0 = ; 0 i = (8)
After taking the Fourier transform on both sides of
Eq. (8) the above condition is translated into the
following equation.
2 2
( ) ( ) 2 X f Y f N + =
(9)
where
( ) X f
and
( ) Y f
are the power spectrum of x
and y respectively. From the spectral condition of (9),
it is observed that the maximum value of the power
spectrum is bounded by 2N.
2
( ) 2 X f N s
(10)
Because the average power of X(f) is equal to N,
assuming that the power of the sequence x is equal to
1, the PAPR of X(f) is bounded as
2
2
N
PAPR
N
s =
(=3 dB)
(11)
Hence. using complementary sequences as input to
generate an OFDM symbol, it is guaranteed that the
maximum PAPR of 3dB can be achieved.
The large sets of binary complementary pairs of
length 2
m
can be obtained from the 2
nd
order cosets
of the well-known 1
st
order Reed-Muller code R(1,
m). This Reed-Muller code results in low PAPR in
addition to its error-correcting capability.
The r
th
order Reed-Muller code is designated as R(r,
m), where m is the parameter related to the length of
the code, n=2
m
, and 0 s r s m. Half of the codes of
R(r, m) are complements of the other half. R(1, m) is
also known as a bi-orthogonal code since it can be
obtained from the generator matrix of an orthogonal
code by adding all-ones codeword to it [12].
In this work, modified PTS is combined with Golay
complementary sequence, PTS is based on combining
signal sub blocks which are phased-shifted by
different phase factors to generate multiple candidate
signals, so as to select the low PAPR signal. Fig.1
shows the model of STBC MIMO-OFDM system.
First, consider the data block,
0, 1, 1
.....
N
X X X X
=
is
encoded with space-time encoder and the following
two vectors
1
X and
2
X can be obtained.
* *
1 0 1 2 1
[ , ,..... , ],
N N
X X X X X
=
* *
2 1 0 1 2
[ , ,..... , ].
N N
X X X X X
=
Encode the data blocks by using Reed Muller code.
Define the codeword as a vector,
* *
1 0 1 2 1
[ , ,..... , ] ,
T
N N
S C C C C
=
* *
2 1 0 1 2
[ , ,..... , ] .
T
N N
S C C C C
=
where, C is an encoded set of code words for any
number of carriers, any M-ary phase modulation
scheme, and any coding rate.
Secondly, S to be transmitted is divided into several
sub-blocks, V, by using subblock partition scheme. In
general, subblock partition scheme can be classified
into 3 categories. The three partition methods are
adjacent, interleaved and random.
S is partitioned into M disjoint sets, which is
represented by the vector,
m
S , m=1,2,.., M (14)
In this work, the codeword vector S is partitioned by
using adjacent method. Assume that the subblocks or
clusters consist of a contiguous set of subcarriers and
are of equal size. The objective is to optimally
combine the M clusters, which in frequency domain
is given by
'
1
M
m m
m
S b S
=
=
(12)
where, {b
m
, m=1, 2,, M} are weighting factors and
are assumed to be perfect rotations. In other words,
the time domain is given by
1
M
m m
m
s b s
=
=
(13)
where,
m
s which is called the partial transmit
sequence, is the IFFT of
m
S and
m
b is the phase
factors, which are required to inform the receiver as
the side information. The set of weighting factor for
V clusters or subblocks are optimized in the time
domain so as to achieve the better PAPR
performance. PTS generates a signal with a low
PAPR through the addition of appropriately phase
rotated signal parts. The codeword to be transmitted
are divided into several subblocks, V, of length N/V.
Mathematically, expressed by
( )
1
V
v
k k
v
A A
=
=
(14)
All subcarriers positions in
( ) v
k
A
which are occupied
in another subblock are set to zero. Each of the
blocks, v, has an IFFT performed on it,
{ }
( ) ( ) v v
n k
a IFFT A =
(15)
The output of each block (except for first block
which is kept constant) is phase rotated by the
rotation factor as given by
( )
[0, 2 ]
j v
e
u
t e (16)
The blocks are then added together to produce
alternate transmit signals containing the same
information as given by
( ) ( )
1
.
V
v j v
n n
v
a a e
u
=
=
(17)
Each alternate transmit signal is stored in memory
and the process is repeated again with a different
phase rotation value. After a set number of phase
rotation values, W, the OFDM symbol with the
lowest PAPR is transmitted as given by
2 3
, ,.... argmin(max )
v
n
a | | | = (18)
The weighting rotation parameter set is chosen to
minimize the PAPR. In MIMO communication, data
rate or diversity order can be improved by exploiting
the spatial dimension. In the same spirit, treating the
parallel transmit signals jointly, PAPR reduction may
be improved. A modified PTS technique with
forward error correcting codes such as Golay
complementary sequences with Reed-Muller code is
proposed to provide better PAPR reduction in the
MIMO-OFDM systems with lower computational
complexity is shown in Fig.1.
4. TURBO CODING
In this work, a turbo encoder is employed which offer
two advantages, significant PAPR reduction and
good bit error rate performance. Turbo codes [13] are
parallel concatenated convolutional codes in which
the information bits are first encoded by a recursive
systematic convolutional (RSC) code and then, after
passing the information bits through an interleaver,
are encoded by a second RSC code. The purpose of
interleaving the coded data transforms burst error into
independent errors. The result of interleaving makes
error burst to spread out in time, so that errors within
a codeword appear to be independent. The role of
puncture is to periodically delete the selected bits to
reduce the coding overhead. Turbo decoder is used to
recover the transmitted signal at the receiver side.
Fig.1 Block diagram of the modified PTS
scheme of MIMO-OFDM system
Also the turbo encoder can be used to generate
different sequences and sequence with lowest PAPR
is selected for transmission. Fig.1 shows the
transmitter side of MIMO-OFDM systems, where the
turbo coding and modified PTS are used for PAPR
reduction.
The procedure for turbo PTS is same as Golay PTS
except Reed-Muller complement sequence is
replaced with turbo encoder sequence. So by
combining these two methods, significant
performance improvement can be achieved.
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The analysis of the modified PTS with forward error
correcting codes such as Golay complementary
sequences with Reed-Muller code and turbo code
techniques has been carried out using MATLAB 7.0.
The simulation parameters considered for this
analysis is summarized in Table 1.
In the MIMO-OFDM systems under consideration,
modified PTS technique is applied to the subblocks
of uncoded information, which is modulated by
QPSK, and the phase rotation factors are transmitted
directly to receiver through subblock. The
performance evaluation is done interms of
complementary cumulative distribution function.
Table 1.Simulation parameters
Simulation
parameters
Type/Value
Number of
subcarriers
64, 128, 256, 512, 1024
Number of subblock
4
Oversampling factor
4
Number of antennas
22
Modulation Scheme
QPSK
Phase factor 1, -1, j, -j
Fig.3 Modified PTS performance for
different number of subcarriers and M
t
=2 with
V=4
Fig.3 shows the performance of modified PTS
technique in MIMO-OFDM system for different
number of subcarriers N= 64,128, 256, 512, and
1024. From this figure it is observed that the values
of PAPR for N= 64,128, 256, 512, and 1024 become
4.8, 5.6, 6.3, 6.9 and 7.5dB respectively when CCDF
= 0.6 and M
t
=2.The PAPR value increases
significantly as number of carriers used in the MIMO
OFDM transmission increase as shown in Fig.3.
Though the multi-carrier OFDM transmission
provides high data rate, it results in high PAPR for
higher subcarriers.
Fig. 4 Modified PTS combined with turbo
codes performance for different number of
subcarriers and M
t
=2 with V=4
Fig.4 shows the performance of modified PTS with
Turbo coding for a subblock size V=4 for the same
different number of subcarriers N= 64,128, 256, 512,
and 1024. It gives the better PAPR reduction at N=64
compared to that at all other subcarriers. From this
figure it is noted that the values of PAPR are
obtained as 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.4 and 7 dB for 64, 128, 256,
512 and 1024 when CCDF=0.6 respectively.
However, the value of PAPR is significantly reduced
for modified PTS with turbo coding system when
compared to modified PTS without coding scheme
(Fig.3 and Fig.4). The PAPR reduction is almost 7 to
20%.
Fig.5 demonstrates the performance of combined
Golay with PTS for subblock size V=4 for different
number of subcarriers N=64, 128, 256, 512, and
1024. It is observed from this figure that even with
increase in the number of subcarriers PAPR remains
constant as Golay sequences is employed. The value
of PAPR become 2.6dB when CCDF=0.6 for all the
subcarriers. Referring to Fig.3, Fig.4 and Fig.5 it is
inferred that, combined Golay with PTS results in
significant PAPR reduction compared to the modified
PTS schemes with turbo code and without coding. It
is almost 50% in PAPR reduction.
Fig. 5 Modified PTS combined with Golay
sequence performance for different number of
subcarriers and M
t
=2 with V=4
6. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, PAPR reduction technique based on
modified PTS with FEC in MIMO-OFDM systems
using STBC has been considered. This approach,
which combines the modified PTS technique with
Golay complementary sequences and Reed-Muller
code, divides the subcarriers of OFDM into several
disjoint subblocks resulting in significant
performance gain in terms of PAPR reduction with
low complexity. As a result, the CCDF of PAPR
exhibits a steeper decay, increased by a factor equal
to the number of transmit antennas. The employment
of MIMO configuration along with PAPR reduction
technique improved the capacity and the performance
of the OFDM system. The simulation results indicate
that the proposed technique has a PAPR reduction
capability more than that of the modified PTS
technique with different subcarriers. Turbo PTS
provides good PAPR performance but as the number
of subcarrier increases PAPR increases. Golay PTS
results in 50% PAPR reduction compared to Turbo
PTS for N=256 and a CCDF value of 0.6 with low
complexity as the PAPR is jointly optimized in both
the real and imaginary part.
REFERENCES
[1] Tao Jiang, Yiyan Wu, An Overview: Peak-to-average
power ratio reduction techniques for OFDM signals,
IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol.54, no.2, pp.257-
267, June 2008.
[2] Zhiqiang Liu, Yan Xin and Georgios B.Giannakis,
Space-time-frequency coded OFDM over frequency-
selective fading channels, IEEE Transactions on
Signal Processing, vol.50, no.10, pp.2465-2476,
Oct2002.
[3] T. Pollet, M. Van Bladel, and M. Moeneclaey, BER
Sensitivity of OFDM Systems to Carrier Frequency Offset
and Wiener Phase Noise, IEEE Transactions on
Communications, vol. 43, no. 2/3/4, pp. 191-
193,Feb1995.
[4] R. ONeill and L.N. Lopes, Envelope Variations and
Spectral Splatter in Clipped Multicarrier Signals, in
Proceedings of International Symposium on Personal,
Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC95),
Toronto, Ont., Canada, vol.1, pp. 7175, Sep1995.
[5] Yung-Lyul Lee, Young-Hwan You, Won-Gi Jong-Ho
Paik, and Hyoung-Kyu Song Peak-to-average power ratio
reduction in MIMO OFDM system using Selective
mapping, IEEE Communications Letters,vol.7,no.12,
pp.575-577, Dec2003.
[6] Xu Yan, Wang Chunli Jr., and Wang Qi, Research of
Peak-to-average power ratio reduction improved algorithm
for MIMO-OFDM system, World Congress on Computer
Science and Information Engineering (WRI), California,
USA, vol.1, pp.171-175, Apr2009.
[7] Xinchun Wu, Zhigang Mao, Jinxiang Wang, Bin
Zho.2009.A novel PTS technique with combinative
optimization in real part and imaginary part for PAPR
reduction in OFDM systems. In proceedings of Third
International Conference on Next Generation Mobile
Applications, Services and Technologies, 215-218.
[8] Kenneth G. Paterson and Vahid Tarokh, On the existence
and construction of Good codes with low peak-to-average
power ratios, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol.46, no.6, pp.1974-1987, Sep2000.
[9] Harish Reddy and Tolga M.Duman, Space-time coded
OFDM with low PAPR, in proceedings of IEEE Global
Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM03),
vol.2, pp.799-803, December 2003.
[10] M.J.E. Golay, Complementary Series, IRE Transactions
on Information Theory, vol.7. pp. 82-87, Apr1961
[11] Branislav M.Popovic, Synthesis of power efficient
multitone signals with flat amplitude spectrum, IEEE
Transactions on Communications, vol.39, no.7, pp.1031-
1033, July 1991.
[12] J.A. Davis and J. Jedwab, Peak-to-Mean Power Control
in OFDM, Golay Complementary Sequences, and Reed
Muller Codes, IEEE Transactions on Information
Theory, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2397-2417, Nov1999.
[13] Mao-Chao Lin and Kuan-Cheng Chen and Sherg-Lung Li,
Turbo coded OFDM system with peak power reduction,
in proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology
Conference(VTC 2003-Fall), Orlando, Florida, USA, vol.4
pp.2282-2286, Oct2003.