Research 9 Week 3-4
Research 9 Week 3-4
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this chapter, students are expected to:
What a literature review is and its role within a research project.
How a well-defined research question can improve the effectiveness of a literature
search.
The steps to carrying out an effective literature review based on your research (or
clinical) question.
How to screen and evaluate the results of a literature review. You will also start the
process of carrying out a literature review for your own resident research project.
Topics Covered:
• THE LITERATURE REVIEW
Values Integration:
• The students will be able to form the choices in doing research studies.
BAGUIO CITY SCIENCE FOUNDATION
06 Old Forestry Compound, Lower Engineer’s Hill, Baguio City
Tel. No. (074) 422-2964
Mobile No. 0955-6591-289 / 0938-6597-309
E-mail address: [email protected]
JUMPSTAR
T!
3. If you are studying a specialized topic, like 'Common symptoms of mentally ill children', but search for
something broad, like 'Psychology of children', you are likely to find:
WEEK 3 and 4
LET’S GET
READY!
THE LITERATURE REVIEW
INTRODUCTION
A review of related literature (a.k.a RRL in research) is a comprehensive review of the existing literature
pertaining to a specific topic or research question. An effective review provides the reader with an organized
analysis and synthesis of the existing knowledge about a subject. With the increasing amount of new
information being disseminated every day, conducting a review of related literature is becoming more difficult
and the purpose of review of related literature is clearer than ever.
A literature review is an integral part of both good research and good clinical practice. When carried out
properly, a literature review can:
- Build knowledge and keep you up-to-date on recent developments in your field.
- Provide specific information to inform evidence-based practice.
- Provide a wealth of background knowledge to inform your research project and/or
justify your research plans. This is especially important when applying for funding or
preparing your research for publication.
- Help focus and refine your research question.
- Identify the unique contribution your research will make and ensure you will not be
replicating existing knowledge.
- Help develop critical analysis skills, which are important for evaluating research and
identifying the best evidence available.
Simply put, good literature reviews lead to better research and evidence-based practice/decision making.
Regular reading and literature reviews should be part of your clinical practice. While the remainder of this
teaching module will focus on the role that literature reviews play in research, much of the knowledge gained
will help to search the scientific literature for the answers to clinical questions.
A research literature review differs from other types of literature reviews in one important aspect: the
intent of the review is to summarize the available literature surrounding your specific research topic. Therefore,
the scope of the review itself is directly related to your research question.
It is also important to consider how much time you have and are able to commit to your literature
review. Comprehensive or systematic reviews can be large and very timeconsuming; they can even be seen as
an independent research project. However, with a little practice and planning, more limited literature reviews
can get you the range of knowedge that you need. The six steps summarized below are key to carrying out an
effective research literature review, and form the basis for the remainder of this module.
Before thinking how to do reviews of related literature, it is necessary to understand its importance. Although
the purpose of a review of related literature varies depending on the discipline and how it will be used, its
importance is never in question. Here are some ways in which a review can be crucial.
Identify gaps in the knowledge – This is the primary purpose of a review of related literature (often
called RRL in research). To create new knowledge, you must first determine what knowledge may be missing.
This also helps to identify the scope of your study.
Avoid duplication of research efforts – Not only will a review of related literature indicate gaps in the existing
research, but it will also lead you away from duplicating research that has already been done and thus save
precious resources.
Provide an overview of disparate and interdisciplinary research areas – Researchers cannot possibly know
everything related to their disciplines. Therefore, it is very helpful to have access to a review of related
literature already written and published.
Highlight researcher’s familiarity with their topic1 – A strong review of related literature in a study
strengthens readers’ confidence in that study and that researcher.
The review of relevant literature or often abbreviated as, RRL in research, is an important communication tool
that can be used in many forms for many purposes. It is a tool that all researchers should befriend.
BAGUIO CITY SCIENCE FOUNDATION
06 Old Forestry Compound, Lower Engineer’s Hill, Baguio City
Tel. No. (074) 422-2964
Mobile No. 0955-6591-289 / 0938-6597-309
E-mail address: [email protected]
FAQ
A research project is usually considered incomplete without a proper review of related literature. The review of
related literature is a crucial component of any research project as it provides context for the research question,
identifies gaps in existing literature, and ensures novelty by avoiding duplication. It also helps inform research
design and supports arguments, highlights the significance of a study, and demonstrates your knowledge an
expertise.
The key difference between an RRL and an RRS lies in their focus and scope. An RRL or review of related
literature examines a broad range of literature, including theoretical frameworks, concepts, and empirical
studies, to establish the context and significance of the research topic. On the other hand, an RRS or review of
research studies specifically focuses on analyzing and summarizing previous research studies within a specific
research domain to gain insights into methodologies, findings, and gaps in the existing body of knowledge.
While there may be some overlap between the two, they serve distinct purposes and cover different aspects of
the research process.
Yes, a comprehensive review of related literature (RRL) plays a vital role in improving the accuracy and
validity of research. It helps authors gain a deeper understanding and offers different perspectives on the
research topic. RRL can help you identify research gaps, dictate the selection of appropriate research
methodologies, enhance theoretical frameworks, avoid biases and errors, and even provide support for research
design and interpretation. By building upon and critically engaging with existing related literature, researchers
can ensure their work is rigorous, reliable, and contributes meaningfully to their field of study.
LET’S
PRACTICE!
Practice and experience are key to becoming proficient at literature reviews. In this module, we have examined
what a literature review is, why it is important, how to choose the right resources, and key concepts in carrying
out and evaluating your literature search. Now is a good time to put what you have learned into practice by
designing and carrying out a literature review for your own research project. (5 points each)
1. Consider the purpose and scope of your literature review. Why are you doing this literature review? How
much time are you able to commit to this review?
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
BAGUIO CITY SCIENCE FOUNDATION
06 Old Forestry Compound, Lower Engineer’s Hill, Baguio City
Tel. No. (074) 422-2964
Mobile No. 0955-6591-289 / 0938-6597-309
E-mail address: [email protected]
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Prepared by:
Noted by: