General President's Address - Caste, Gender and Ideology in The Making of India
General President's Address - Caste, Gender and Ideology in The Making of India
General President's Address - Caste, Gender and Ideology in The Making of India
INDIA
Author(s): Suvira Jaiswal
Source: Proceedings of the Indian History Congress , 2007, Vol. 68, Part One (2007), pp.
1-35
Published by: Indian History Congress
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44147814
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Indian History Congress is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Proceedings of the Indian History Congress
II
Ill
and evil character of the śudra may have been partly due to ethn
prejudice but also because of his dependence on slavish manua
work and marginal location. It is generally held thaťthe śudra va
arose out of defeated Dāsa, Śudra and other aboriginal non-Ar
tribes reduced to various degrees of servitude. The Śudra tribe31
not mentioned in the Rgveda^ but it speaks of the capture an
enslavement of a large number of Dāsa men and women32 with t
result that the tribal name 'Dāsa* became a signifier of 'slave'.
Rgvedic chieftains made liberal gifts of male and female slaves to
priests and composers of the hymns and, as Kosambi has
argued,33 the assignment of slave-labour to the priestly and warrior
lineages by the tribal chieftain played a catalytic role in the growth
of social differentiation within Aryan tribes and emergence of a
class structure in the form of four original castes, i.e., the varņas.
Kosambi explains that the subjugation of the Dāsa, Śudra and other
tribes gave rise to a generalized form of servitude in the form of
the śudra varņa and not chattel slavery, for the tribal influence was
still strong and individual property had not developed sufficiently
yet. Internal differentiations among the vedic tribes emerged with
the priestly and warrior lineages uniting to exploit both the 4 Aryan
peasant (vaiśya) and non-Aryan helot (śudra)'.
The cooperation and interdependence of the priestly and ruling
groups and their exploitation and subjugation of the vaiśya and śudra
producers is a well-known feature of the later vedic epoch. What
deserves note is the fact that the varņa ideology from its very
inception plays a political and not just religious role in the
hierarchical structuring of social relations. The varņa system, and
later its expanded version the jāti system,34 regulated the class
structure of early India and as such was a powerful instrument
functioning in the interest of the ruling classes. Its strong links
with contemporary political powers and politics have been
maintained, as we shall see, throughout its long history.
It may be argued that elaboration of vedic sacrifices into rituals
of great complexity made it a preserve of specialist lineages, and
the transmission of expertise to one's descendants and disciples
finally gave rise to the brāhmaņa varņa.35 The vedic ritual
specialists played a crucial role in providing religious justification
for the superior claims of the vedic chieftain and his râjanya
kinsmen over the vis commoners reducing the need for the use of
force, which undoubtedly underpinned such claims.36 As tribal
structure disintegrated and socio-economic disparities grew the
IV
of the good or bad deeds, and this is an unending cycle from whic
one can find release only through a realization of the imperson
brahma or Truth - developed in this environment. The significant
point is that it was an ideology which germinated in the elite circle
Not being rooted in early vedic thought it was taught initially as a
secret knowledge discussed by a few, but later became the basic
principle of the ideological explanation of the cosmos ( samsara )
preached by the brāhmaņas, wandering ascetics and mystics
filtering down from them to lower orders. Basham is quite emphatic
that it was not a borrowing of a pre-existing idea from non-Aryan,
indigenous peoples having animistic beliefs as was suggested by
earlier scholars but an invention of the upanisadic thinkers. It had
its sceptics in the form of Cārvākas, Lokâyatikas and Nāstikas but
soon became the ideology of the mainstream, and at the time of the
rise of Jainism and Buddhism it was accepted by everyone in the
Gangetic valley.
However, the texts available to us are documents of the upper
castes and it is difficult to infer on their basis the extent to which
this ideology was internalized by the depressed groups. Max Weber
wrote42 that the inexorable logic of this doctrine reconciled the
poor and the depressed to their lot in the hope that through good
conduct they could improve their destiny in their next birth. But
field studies conducted among the 'untouchable' castes by a number
of sociologists43 show that although the ideas of transmigration and
karma - that is, sins committed in previous lives are the causes of
misfortunes in the present one - is accepted generally, the low
status of their caste is not explained in this fashion. Their origin
myths ascribe their present degraded social ranking to some
historical accident or trickery of the high castes played on their
ancestors or genealogical founder. We shall be doing less than
justice to the common sense of the exploited if we imagine that
there would have been no resistance even in thought let alone
practice.
Traces of resistance are not altogether lacking despite the nature
of our sources. These have been overlooked generally owing to
the preconceived notions of the Orientalist and Nationalist
historiographies. If colonial reconstructions emphasized the static,
stagnant nature of Indian society immune to changes owing to a
rigid caste structure rooted in religious beliefs, the nationalists
presented an idealized picture of social harmony and contentment
with castes engaged in their traditional occupations without any
social tensions or conflicts.
VI
VII
The upper class contempt of manual labour has been one of the
basic organizing principles of the varņa-jāti hierarchy. It is held121
that the Buddha forbade the monks manual labour in order to free
them from worldly preoccupations. The prohibition could have been
also under the influence of the doctrine of ahimsã (non-violence),
as levelling the soil, watering fields, gardens, etc. destroyed
'lives'.122 Hence, Buddhist monasteries were gifted ã rãmikas
(monastery-slaves) and to supervise their work a monk was elected
as ārāmika-pessaka (supervisor of ãrãmikas ).123 Manual work wąs
avoided by the nuns too and domestic work was declared an offence
by a pãcittiya rule.124 Such a negative attitude distanced the monk-
philosophers of Mahãyãna Buddhism from physical work to such
an extent that they developed a philosophy which took into
cognizance only the 'mental' nature of our experiences arguing that
everything is essentially no more than a 'mental construction
( prajnaptimãtraY 125 Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya describes it as a
revolutionary philosophy passing into its opposite.126 In material
terms the effect of this ideological turn of Buddhism was to further
devalue and depress those who earned their living through physical
labour; and ultimately it gave rise to Sahajayäna form of Buddhism
popular among the lower castes.127 In Jainism too there was an
excessive emphasis on non-killing of all forms of life leading to
the prohibition of agricultural and other types of manual activities
from the very beginning. I have shown elsewhere128 that in post-
vedic times with the depression of the peasantry, the well-to-do
members of the vis community became traders and adopted Jainism
in order to emphasize their disassociation from agriculture, with
the result that in course of time only merchants and traders came
to be known as vaisyas. The shift from the later vedic to the post-
vedic connotation of the term is indicative of the decline in the
status of those communities which were engaged in the cultivation
of the soil and artisanal activities involving manual work. In
Brahmanism, as we have seen, the servitude of the śudra was the
foundation stone of the varņa system. Disdain towards him was
extended to cover all the jāti s subsisting on manual work and
primary production in post-vedic times and the attitude was further
VIII
11. I have shown that thç two terms are used interchangeably in early India
Caste, pp. 42-3.
12. P.V. Kane quotes Sūta Samhitã, Śiva Mãhãtmya Khançla, 1 2.5 1 .52, which states
that 'a man belongs to a caste by birth and no action of his can alter that fact,
that several castes are like the species of animals and that caste attaches to the
body and not to the soul' History of Dharmašāstra, vol. II, pt ii, (Bhandarkar
Oriental Research Institute, Poona, 1941), p. 52. The Bhagavad-gītā (XVIII.
4 1 ) clearly says that owing to their natural (inborn) qualities ( guņas ) the four
varņas have been assigned different functions. For a detailed discussion, S.
Jaiswal, The Making of a Hegemonic Tradition: The cult ofßäma Dāsarathī ,
S.C. Misra Memorial Lecture, Indian History Congress, 67 session, March
2007, p. 26-7 note 54. For the implication of the theory of guņas for the
hereditary nature of varņa organization, idem, 'Caste, Ideology and Context',
Indologica Taurinensia, ' ol. XXIII- XXIV (1997-98) p. 611.
13. See the origin myths current among Chamars, Dacca Chandals, Kayasthas,
Vaniyans, Bhangis, etc. cited by Dipankar Gupta to show that there were many
and not one caste ideologies. Interrogating Caste , pp. 73-7.
14. D.D. Kosambi, Introduction to the Study of Indian Histo ry, Popular Prakasha
Bombay, 1956, p. 25; Morton Klass, Caste: The Emergence of the South Asian
Social System , Institute for the study of Human Issues, Philadelphia, 1980, p
175; Irfan Habib, Essays in Indian History : Towards a Marxist Perception ,
Tulika, New Delhi, 1995, p. 165. S.M. Michael, (ed.), Dalits in Modern India:
Vision and Values , Sage Publications, New Delhi (1999), 2nd ed. 2007,
Introduction, p. 17.
15. S.Jaiswal, Caste , p. 9f ; 157-8.
16. Louis Dumont, Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste, System and its Implications,
first published, 1 966, complete revised English edition, OUP, Delhi, 1988.
17. S. Jaiswal, Caste , p. 34-8, 103 Note 54; 1 1 8 note 207; idem. 'Caste: Ideology
and Context', lndologica Taurinensia , vol. XXIII-XXIV ( 1997-98), pp. 611-
5. Also see Gerald D. Berreman's excellent critique, 'The Brahmanical view
of caste', Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.) No. V (1970), pp. 16-25.
18. S. Jaiswal, 'varņa Ideology and Social Change'. Social Scientist, vol. 19, nos.
3-4, March- April 1991, p. 4 If.
19. Louis Dumont, op. cit., p. 1 13.
20. D.D. Kosambi, Myth and Reality : Studies in the Formation of Indian Culture ,
Popular Prakashan, Bombay, 1962, pp. 42-81
21. Ibid., p. 68; 76.
22. Romila Thapar, Ancient Indian Social History , Orient Longman, New Delhi
1978, p. 18; R.S. Sharma, Material Culture and Social Formations in Ancient
India, Macmillan, Delhi, Ltd. 1983, p. 157; D.N. Jha, Ancient India in
Historical outline, Manohar, Delhi, 1998. For the latest summing up of the
archaeological and linguistic arguments respectively, Jonathan Mark Kenoyer.
'Culture and Societies of the Indus Tradition', and Madhav M. Deshpande,
'Aryan Origins: Brief History of Linguistic Arguments' in Romila Thapar (ed.),
India : Historical Beginnings and the concept of the Aryan , National Book
Trust, New Delhi, 2006, pp.4 1-97 and 98-156.
23. S. Jaiswal, Caste, pp. 136-7, 195; idem, 'Inventing a Culture of Patriarchy:
An Aspect Brahmanism', Mamidipudi Venkatarangaiya Memorial Lecture- 14,
Proceedings of the Andhra Pfadesh History Congress, XXVI Session,
Anaparti, 2002, Appendix I, pp.i-xv.
24. Suvira Jaiswal, 'Reconstructing History from the Rgveda: A Paradigm Shift?'
Social Science Probings , vol. 18, no. 2 (Dec. 2006), pp. 15-6.
25. For example, see Hans-Peter Schmidt on RV .X. 27.12 which speaks of a
beautiful woman choosing her spouse among the suitors of her own free will
( svayam sa mitram vanuté jane cit). According to Schmidt the hymn shows
the prevalence of bride-price and the girl goes to the highest bidder. Hans-
Peter Schmidt, Some Women's Rites and Rights in the Veda, Bhandarkar,
Oriental Research Institute, Poona, 1987, pp. 76-7. He translates panyas as
bride-price, but Monier-Williams equates it with paniyas meaning very
wonderful' ( Sanskrit-English Dictionary , s.v. panyas and Säyana glosses it as
'one who is eulogised with praise' ( panyasa stotreņa). For a detailed
discussion, S. Jaiswal, 'Process of gendering in the Brahmanical Tradition,
Prajnā Bhāratī, vol. XI, in Honour of Prof. Ram Sharan Sharma, K.P. Jayaswal
Research Institute, Patna, 2005, pp. 21-5.
26. Sadashiv Ambadas Dange, Sexual Symbolism from Vedic Ritual , Ajanta
Publications, Delhi. 1979, pp. 73-4; Fredrick M. Smith, 'Indra's curse, Varuņa's
37. According to a Tibetan tradition the Śakyas and the Licchavis were branches
of the same tribe. The origin myths of both the groups attribute brother-sister
marriage to the founders; and the origin of the Koliyas of Rāmagāma too is
traced from a Śakya girl in such texts as Sumarigalavilasini and Mahāvastu .
Quoted by S.N. Misra, Ancient Indian Republics . The upper India Publishing
House, Lucknow, 1976, p. 46. Śuddhodhana, the father of the Buddha, is said
to have married two Koliyan princesses, Maya and Mahāpajāpati Gotami.
Kosambi discounts this tradition on the ground that the Śakyas were too proud
to marry outside their tribe. He cites the story of Pasenadi, the king of Kosala,
who was tricked into marrying Vãsabhakhattiyã, the daughter of Mahānāma
Śakya by a slave girl named Nāgamuņ^ā. However, this only shows that the
Śakyans did not want to displease Pasenadi, who had asked for the hand of a
Śakya girl, but at the same time they did not wish to give a girl of pure Śakya
lineage in marriage to him, who belonged to the lowly Mātanga-kula. The
tribe of Mātangas was later equated with Çãndãlas. In the Dlgha Nikclya , the
Buddha tells brāhmaņa Ambattha that the khattiyas (ksatriyas) are more rigid
and refuse to accept in their own gro^p a man who is not pure by birth for
seven generations on the side of his both parents, but the brāhmaņas accept
sons born of partial non- brāhmaņa origin on either side and allow them to
participate in yajña , irāddha, sthālīpāka, etc. Dīgha Nikãya , vol. I, pp. 92-7
quoted in N. Wagle, Society at the time of the Buddha , Popular Prakashan,
Bombay, 1966, pp. 101-3.
However, the Licchavis and Jñatrikas, both members of the Vajjian
confederacy, are known to have had marriage relations. Licchavi chief Cetaka's
sister Triśala was married to Siddhārtha of the Jñatrikas, the father of the J aina
Tirthańkara Mahāvīra. Cetaka's daughter Cellana was married to Bimbisāra
the king of Magadha and Ajataśatru was her son. Cetaka had several daughters
whom he gave in marriage to ksatriya rulers of the time. No doubt kings took
wives from other varņas too but the mother of the heir-apparent or claimant to
the throne had to be of ksatriya lineage as is shown by the story of Viduçlabha,
son of Väsabha-khattiyä. Also see S. Jaiswal, Caste , p. 15; 27 note 83. Wagle
speaks of Śakyas, Licchavis, etc, as extended kin-groups which slowly ossified
into castes by the time of the Manusmrti. That ksatriyas too had become a
caste like the brāhmaņas is shown by the fact that an inscription from Andhra
Pradesh paleographically assigned to the early centuries of the Common Era
speaks of ksatriya marchants. K. Gopalachari, Early History of the Andhra
Country , Madras, 1941, p.91. The Manusmrti , X. 43-4 speaks of ksatriya jātis
in plural indicating the existence of a number ksatriya castes within the broad
varņa category.
38. Śatapatha brāhmaņa, II. 1.4.4; Xi. 5. 7. 1; XII. 4. 4. 6; 4.4.7; XIII 19.1.-2,
edited by Ganga Prasad Upadhyaya, The Research Institute of Ancient
Scientific Studies, New Delhi; 1970, Translator , J. Eggeling, Sacred Books
of East Series, Vols. 12, 26, 41, 43, 44, Reprint, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi,
1988.
43. Pauline Kolenda, "Religious anxiety and Hindu fate", in Religion in South
Asia , edited by E.B.Harper, pp.7 1-81, University of Washington Press, Seattle,
reprinted in P. Kolenda, Caste, Cult and Hierarchy , pp. 1 69-83 ; Joan P.
Mencher, 'The caste system Upside Down, or the Not -So- Mysterious East'.
Current Anthropology, Vol.15 no. 4, December 1974. Eleanor Zelliot, From
Untouchable to Dalit: Essays on the Ambedkar Movement , Monohar, Delhi ,
1996, p. 74 note 5; Robert Deliege, 'The Myths of Origin of the Indian
Untouchables', Man , New series, Vol 28, No 3 (September 1993), pp 533 -
549.
50. Ordinary people of 'clean' ( śuddha ) castes must have used open spaces.
5 1 . Hiroyuki Kotani, cites a document of 1 8th century (quoted from G.S. Sardesai
(ed.) Selections from the Peshva Daftar , Vol 43-92) that a female servant
employed in the house of a brāhmaņa family turned out to be of the Chambar
caste. Hence all those who had come in contact with her had to undergo various
degrees of purification. Another instance cited by him shows that a female
slave belonging to a family of Prabhu caste committed adultery with an antyaja
(ati-śudra), which fact made all the members of the Prabhu family impure. H.
Kotani, "Ati-śudra castes in the Medieval Deccan.' In H. Kotani (ed), Caste
System, Untouchability and the Depressed , Monohar, Delhi ,1997, pp 56 -7.
52. For fair looking Rājaputra (Rajput) girls sold into slavery and obliged to do
all kinds of pure and 'impure' work, Pushpa Prasad, 'Female slavery in
Thirteenth century Gujarat; IHR, XV nos. 1-2 (July 1988 - Jan 1989) pp. 269-
75, S. Jaiswal, Caste , pp. 84-5. The Nāradasmrti, written perhaps in the 4th
century CE clearly specifies that while a hired servant ( karmakara ) is supposed
to do pure work only, slaves are to do all kinds of impure work. P.V. Kane,
History ofDharmasāstra, II, pt.i.p. 1 84f. Also see Prabhati Mukherjee, Beyond
the Four varnas: The Untouchables in India , Indian Institute of Advanced
Study, Shimla, Revised ed. 2002, p. 75.
53. This does not, however, mean that the institution of untouchability can be
traced to Harappa culture as was done by Christoph von Furer-Haimendorf.
See S. Jaiswal, Caste , pp. 78-9.
54. T.R. Sareen, 'Slavery in India Under British Rule, 1772-1843', IHR, XV nos.l-
2, (July 1988 & January 1989), pp. 257-68.
55. Gita Ramaswamy, India Stinking: Manual Scavengers in Andhra Pradesh and
their work, Navayana Publishing, Chennai, 2005, p. 6.
56. Uma Chakravarti, op. cit., p. 104.
57. Narendra Wagle, Society at the Time of the Buddha , Popular Prakashan,
Bombay, 1966, pp. 1 19-20; 122-23.
58. On Rathakāra, Vivekanand Jha, 'Status of the Rathakara in Early Indian ,
History', Journal of Indian History, vol.52, pt.i (Trivendrum, April 1974),
pp. 39-47. In the Arthaśclstra of Kautilya (III. 7.35) He is described as a
vaišya. The Veņas seem to have been a non-Aryan tribe of 'bamboo-workers'
or basket-makers.
59. Rgveda, VIII, 5.38 has carmamna. Sayana explains that it refers to armour
made of leather.
64. Ibid., X.36. Also repeated in Mahabharata (cr. edn.), XIII, 48.26.
65. Śudras in Ancient India , 2nd revised edition, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1980,
p. 330-333.
66. Epigraphia Indica , vol.X, Lüder's List No. 1273.
67. Patañjali on Pāņini II. 4.10, Mahabhasya of Patañjali, edited by F. Kielhorn
vol.1 (Mumbai, 1892), p. 475.
68. See Vivekanand Jha, IHR, II, i, pp. 21-31.
69. D.N. Jha, The Myth of the Holy Cow , Verso, London, 2001, chapt. 3.
70. Ajay Mitra Shastri, India as Seen in the Brhatsamhita of Varahamihira , Motilal
Banarsidass, Delhi, 1969, p. 214.
7 1 . Manusmrti cited above. It also approves of meat eating by declaring that the
flesh of an animal killed by a dog, a carnivorous animal and a Cāņdāla is pure.
Cāņdālas, called Dasyu in this verse, were apparently hunters selling animal
flesh.
However K.R. -Hanumanthan finds in the Buddhist and Jaina works like
Maņimekalai and Ācārakovai some traces of the concept of pollution and
untouchability 'due to puristic and ahimsa doctrines of these religions. Op. cit.,
p. 65.
76. Gail Omvedt, Buddhism in India , Sage Publications, New Delhi, 2003, pp
149-185
77. D.D. Kosambi, 'The Decline of Buddhism in India' first published in 1956
and included in Exasperating Essays: Exercises in Dialectical Method ,
published by R.P. Nene, Pune, 1986, pp 63-6. Also see idem, Introduction to
the Study of Indian History , pp 246-7; 261-3; 291-4.
78. R.C. Mitra, The Decline of Buddhism in India , Visva Bharati, Santi Niketan,
1954.
79. It is for this reason that in propounding Navayana Buddhism Ambedkar rejected
the doctrine of karma and rebirth altogether, as according to him it was
101. In the Agarma Suttanta of the Dīgha Nikãya the Buddha explains to his two
young brāhmaņa disciples the origin of the universe as well as of the khattiya
and brāhamaņamaņdalas (groups) and of the vessas and suddas. In its origin
the division is functional with the khattiyas occupying the first place, but later
these are assumed to be fixed or hereditary. DTgha Nikäya (T.W. Rhys Davids
and J.E. Carpenter, eds. 3 vols, Pali Text. Society, London, 1 890- 19 1 1 ), vol.
3, p. 93f, translation by TW Rhys Davids (3 vols Sacred Books of the Buddhists,
London 1899-1921), vol. 3; p. 88f
We do not have Jaina works of a comparable early date, but the varna divisions
are taken for granted in the Ãcãraúga and Uttarãdhyayana sūtnis.
102. N. Wagle, op. cit, p 125 f
103. Uma Chakravarti, op. cit., Appendix C.
104. A.K. Warder, Indian Buddhism , Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi, 1970, pp 232-3.
105. Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya, Religion and Society; Stephanos Nirmalendu
Ghose Lectures, (1981) of Calcutta University, Ma-Le Publishers. Bangalore,
1987, Lecture VII; Devaraj Chanana, op cit, p. 60f.
106. Jātaka nos. 59 ; 179; 309; 497; 498 in Jā takas , Faüsboll (ed), 7 vols, with Index,
London, 1877-97. Tr. Various hands under the editorship of E. B. Cowell, 7
vols with index, Cambridge, 1895 -1907.
107. P. V. Kane, History of Dharmaśastra , vol. V, pt ii (Bhandarkar Oriental
Research Institute, Poona, 1962), p 926; 1009-10.
108. Visņudharma Purāņa, chap. 25; Brhannarad'iya Purāna , 14-70; 186; 22.9
quoted in R.C. Hazra, Studies in the Upapurāņas , vol. I, pp 147-8; 325-7. The
Arthaś astra of Kautilya II. 4. 23 instructs that the dwelling place of the
pāsaņdas and Cāņdālas should be on the outskirts of the cremation ground.
The Kautillya Arthasāstra, edited by R.P. Kangle, Vol. 1, University of Bombay,
Bombay, 2nd edition 1970) p. 39.
109. Nalinakshadutt in the Classical Age, History and Culture of the Indian People ,
vol. Ill (Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bombay, 3rd edition, 1970), p. 386.
110. Vajrasūcī of Ašvaghosa, edited and translated by Sujit Kumar, Visvabharati,
Santiniketan, 1950. The identification of this Ašvaghosa with the author of
the Buddhacarita is, however, doubtful.
the horizontal spread of the varna ideology 'drew widely dispersed and
originally outlying groups into a structure which allowed them in a large
measure to retain their original character'. The Making of Early Medieval
India . OUP, Delhi; 1994, pp.35; 203. Also see S. Jaiswal, Caste , pp.230- 1.
139. Hermann Kulke, Kings and Cults: State Formation and Legitimation in India
and South- East Asia, Manohar, Delhi, 1993, pp. 82-93; Bhairabi Prasad Sahu,
The Past as a Mirror of the Present: The Case of Oriya Society' Social Science
Probings , vol. IX (1-4), March-December 1995, pp. 8-23.
140. S. Nagaraju, 'Emergance of Regional Identity and Beginnings of Vernacular
Literature: A Case Study', Social Scientist , vol. 23, nos. 10-12, October-
December 1995, pp 8-23.
141 . The confusion has been traced to Rāmānujācārya, who in his book Brahmasatra
B has y a (II. I. 37-42) identifies the Kālāmukhas with Kāpālikas. But in fact
these two were quite distinct; and the Kālāmukha monks seem to have been in
active competition with the Jaina monks. Lorenzen is quite positive that there
is no reason why the Kālāmukhas should not be regarded as orthodox pandits.
'The Kālāmukha Background to Vīrašaivism: Studies in Orientology' in S.K.
Maity, Upendra Thakur and A.K. Narayan eds.. Essays in Memory of Professor
A.L. Basha/n , Y. K. Publishers, Agra, 1988, p. 279. Also see S.C. Nandimath
'Saivism' in R. R. Di vakar and others, (eds .)t_Kamataka Through the Ages ,
The Government of Mysore, Bangalore, 1960, pp 153-4, R.N. Nandi, Religious
Institutions and Cults in the Deccan, pp. 85-90.
Nagaraju refers to the anti-caste feelings expressed in the poems of
Mallikārjuna Paņditārādhya. But he belongs to the twelfth century and was a
contemporary of Basava, the founder of the Lingãyat movement, which was
strongly anti-vedic and anti-caste at least in its origins.
142. The ninth century Maruru inscription of Arkalgud Taluk records a landgrant
to a Kālāmukha centre for vidyä dāna. B.R. Gopal et al., Epigraphut Carnatica,
1984, 8: Ag 28 quoted in Malini Adiga, op. cit., 308.
143.Jabalpur Stone Inscription of Jayasimha, verse 44, V.V. Mirashi, Corpus
Inscriptionum Indicarían , Vol. IV pt. I, no. 64, Government Epigraphist for
India, Ootacamund, 1955. trans, p. 339.
144. J. H. Hutton, Caste in India : Its Nature . Function and Origins . Cambridge
University Press. Cambridge. 1946, p. 249.
145. Louis Dumont. A South Indian Súbeoste: Social Organization and Religion
of Pramalai Kallat' OUP, Delhi, 1986.
146. Ibid., p. 12. For the reinterpretation of the śudra category in the context of
South Indian communities, S. Jaiswal, Caste , pp 70-71.
147. Nicholas B. Dirks, op. cit., pp 12-60.
148. Ibid.
149. Hutton, op. cit., p. 178-9 for the eight prohibitions propounded by the Kallar
of Ramnad in December 1930. Some of these were that the Adi-Dravida
(untouchable) women shall not cover the upper portion of their bodies, shall
not use flowers or saffron paste; the males shall not wear clothes above their
hips or below their knees and so on. Non-compliance led the Kallars to use
violence against the Adi-Dravidas, whose huts were burned, granaries and
properties destroyed and livestock looted.
150. A South Indian Subcaste . pp 218-23.
156. On Dalit mentality, S. Jaiswal, 'Dalit Asmit aur Agenda jati vinaša ka' in
Akhilesh, ed., Tadbhav , vol. 15, (Jan. 2007), pp. 27-40.