QUESTION

DESIGN A LOGISTICS PRICING MODEL FOR YOUR ORGANISATION, SHOWING

TRADEOFFS AND VARIATIONS
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.1. Introduction.................................................................................................................1

1.2. Logistics Pricing Models.............................................................................................1

1.3. Designing the logistics pricing model for the fertiliser company...............................2

1.4. Tradeoffs and Variations of the Logistics model outlined above................................4

1.5. Conclusion...................................................................................................................6

REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................7
1.1. Introduction
This essay designs a logistics pricing model for a fertiliser manufacturing organisation,
showing the tradeoffs and variations. It begins by defining the main terms which are logistics
and pricing model as they are used in this essay. In this essay the term logistics refers to the
planning, execution, and management of the flow of raw materials, intermediate products,
and finished fertilisers from suppliers to production facilities, and then to distribution centers
and customers (Kong, Chen & Liu, 2022). In this case, efficient logistics is crucial for cost
optimisation, timely delivery, and overall supply chain resilience. According to Chen, Wu
and Hsu (2019) the term pricing model are frameworks designed to assign economic value to
various components of the logistics process, ensuring cost-efficiency, profitability, and
competitive pricing. For the fertiliser manufacturing and distribution organisation, outlined in
this essay, logistics encompasses the intricate processes of procuring raw materials,
producing fertilisers, and delivering the final products to agricultural markets or end
consumers. As such, the design of a logistics pricing model for this organisation is crucial for
maintaining operational efficiency, minimising costs, and meeting market demands
effectively. The following section outlines the common logistics pricing models in the
domain of supply chains.

1.2. Logistics Pricing Models

There are three main logistics pricing models which can be adopted by fertiliser companies
which are the cost-plus pricing model, contract pricing model and the single-source pricing
model (Kong et al, 2022). In the cost-plus pricing model, the company calculates the total
cost of logistics (including transportation, storage, handling, and inventory) and adds a
predetermined profit margin (Rachman & Junipriansa, 2024). The advantages of this model
are that they enhance the ease of doing business through its transparency, simplicity, and
stability. The disadvantage of this model is that it may not account for market fluctuations or
competitive pressures. In the contract pricing model, the company negotiates long-term
contracts with logistics providers (e.g., carriers, warehouses) based on agreed-upon rates
(Hanson, 1992). This model gives the company predictability, risk-sharing, and stability;
however, it limits flexibility during market volatility. According to Chen et al (2019), in the
single-source pricing model the company selects a single logistics provider for all its needs
(e.g., a dedicated carrier). This model gives the company several advantages such as the
streamlined communication, potential cost saving. However, this model gives the company a
dependency on a single logistics provider, reduced flexibility.
1.3. Designing the logistics pricing model for the fertiliser company

This section outlines a well-rounded logistics pricing model for a fertilizer manufacturing and
distribution organization should include several key components. Firstly, the company must
specify their raw material procurement costs which involves the cost of acquiring essential
raw ingredients such as natural gas, phosphates, and potash. Efficient raw material
procurement strategies can significantly enhance logistics by reducing supply chain
disruptions and negotiating better purchase terms, as highlighted by Sanders and Premus
(2005) in the context of strategic sourcing. Hence, fluctuations in raw material prices and
transportation costs from suppliers must be carefully accounted for.

Manufacturing costs encapsulate expenses incurred during production, including labour,

energy consumption, equipment maintenance, and overhead costs. Efficiently managing these
costs is crucial for maintaining profitability. According to Banerjee and Mishra (2017),
optimizing manufacturing operations through lean manufacturing practices can improve not
only cost efficiency but also logistics by reducing production lead times and enhancing
flexibility.

Inventory management costs focus on efficiently managing stock to avoid overstocking or

stockouts. This includes inventory holding costs, warehousing costs, and costs associated
with inventory obsolescence. Proper inventory management aids logistics by ensuring
product availability and minimizing storage costs, as discussed by Chopra and Meindl (2016).
Effective inventory control using techniques such as Just-In-Time (JIT) can enhance logistics
performance by reducing unnecessary inventory and associated holding costs.

Transportation and distribution costs cover the expenses related to moving finished products
from manufacturing sites to distribution centers and, eventually, to end customers. These
costs encompass fuel, vehicle maintenance, driver salaries, and other logistical expenses.
Optimizing transportation logistics is essential, as pointed out by Simchi-Levi et al. (2008).
Implementing advanced transportation management systems (TMS) can lead to better route
planning, reducing fuel consumption, and improving delivery times, thus enhancing overall
distribution efficiency.

Order processing and administrative costs include handling customer orders, processing
payments, managing documentation, and administrative overheads. Efficient order processing
systems minimize these costs and enhance logistics by streamlining operations and reducing
delays, as evidenced in studies by Boyer and Hult (2005). Automation and integration of
order processing systems with other logistical functions can result in faster and more accurate
order fulfilment.

Customer service and support costs involve expenses related to after-sales support and
maintaining customer relationships. These costs should be factored into the pricing model as
they enhance customer loyalty and satisfaction. Providing high-quality customer service can
lead to repeat business and positive referrals, impacting long-term logistics positively,
according to Grönroos (2007). Investing in customer service infrastructure ensures that any
logistical issues are promptly addressed, maintaining continuous product flow.

Lastly, regulatory compliance costs encompass adhering to environmental regulations, safety

standards, and other legal requirements. Compliance with regulatory standards is critical to
avoid legal penalties and maintain a company's reputation, as discussed by Porter and van der
Linde (1995). Incorporating these costs into the pricing model ensures that the company
meets all necessary requirements, thereby avoiding operational disruptions and enhancing
logistics stability. By integrating these components into the logistics pricing model, a
fertilizer company can effectively manage its logistics operations, ensuring cost efficiency
and operational resilience. The table below shows the logistics pricing model:

Table 1: Logistics Pricing Model

COMPONENT DESCRIPTION KEY FACTORS POTENTIAL COST

DRIVERS

RAW Costs associated Quality, quantity, Raw material prices,

MATERIAL with acquiring transportation, supplier transportation costs,
PROCUREMENT essential raw relationships, market supplier discounts,
materials fluctuations customs duties

MANUFACTURI Expenses incurred Labor efficiency, energy Direct labor costs,

NG during production usage, equipment energy costs,
maintenance, overhead depreciation, rent,
allocation utilities

INVENTORY Costs related to Inventory turnover, Holding costs,

MANAGEMENT holding and storage capacity, warehousing costs,
managing stock obsolescence rates, stockout costs,
 demand forecasting obsolescence losses

TRANSPORTATI Expenses for Route optimization, fleet Fuel costs, driver wages,
ON AND moving finished management, carrier vehicle maintenance,
DISTRIBUTION products selection, packaging packaging materials, tolls

ORDER Costs associated Order processing Salaries, software costs,

PROCESSING with handling efficiency, system communication costs,
AND customer orders automation, printing and stationery
ADMINISTRATI
and administrative documentation
ON
tasks

CUSTOMER Expenses related Response time, resolution Customer service

SERVICE AND to after-sales efficiency, customer personnel, training,
SUPPORT support and satisfaction equipment, warranty
customer claims
relationships

REGULATORY Costs for adhering Compliance audits, Legal fees, fines,

COMPLIANCE to environmental permits, certifications, environmental
and safety waste management assessments, equipment
regulations upgrades

1.4. Tradeoffs and Variations of the Logistics model outlined above

Designing a comprehensive logistics pricing model necessitates a delicate balancing act
between various competing factors. Firstly, the pursuit of economies of scale often clashes
with the need for operational flexibility, as larger-scale operations as the fertiliser
manufacturing company does, while potentially cost-effective, may hinder adaptability to
market shifts or specific customer requirements (Chopra & Meindl, 2016). Similarly, the
company must know that the centralisation of distribution offers economies of scale in
warehousing and inventory management, but can lead to increased transportation expenses
for geographically dispersed customers. This trade-off is counterbalanced by decentralized
distribution, which reduces transportation costs within specific regions but elevates overall
warehousing expenses.
The interplay between fixed and variable costs is another critical consideration the company
must make in designing the logistics model (Banerjee & Mishra, 2017). While fixed costs
remain constant, variable costs fluctuate with operational volume, thereby influencing overall
profitability of the company, therefore an optimal mix of these costs is essential for
sustainable pricing. The decision to manage logistics in-house versus outsourcing to third-
party logistics providers presents a trade-off between control, cost, and expertise. In-house
operations offer greater control but require significant investments, whereas third-party
providers provide expertise and scalability at the cost of reduced control.

Another critical consideration the company must make are the complexities of transport mode
selection, shipping methods, and pricing significantly influence a fertilizer company's
logistics costs and overall profitability (Banerjee & Mishra, 2017). Firstly, air transport, while
offering rapid delivery, is prohibitively expensive for bulk commodities like fertilisers,
conversely, sea and rail transport, though slower, offer substantial cost advantages for the
company. Therefore, the company must carefully evaluate the trade-off between speed and
cost based on product urgency and customer location. Moreover, the optimal transport mode
also depends on the location of production facilities, distribution centers, and end markets.
For instance, if the company serves a vast geographical area, a combination of rail and road
transport might be most efficient. As such the company must understand that bulk shipping,
while reducing transportation costs per unit, leads to higher inventory holding expenses due
to large quantities stored at distribution centers. In addition, just-in-time delivery helps
manage inventory costs by aligning production and distribution with actual demand (Choi et
al, 2023). However, it requires precise demand forecasting and efficient transportation
networks, which can be challenging in the fertilizer industry due to factors like weather
conditions affecting crop cycles.

Since, fertilizer prices are influenced by factors like raw material costs, energy prices, and
crop yields. Therefore, dynamic pricing allows the company to adjust prices in response to
these fluctuations, maximizing profits (Li & Mizuno, 2022). However, frequent price changes
can erode customer trust. Static pricing offers stability and predictability for customers,
fostering long-term relationships (Li & Mizuno, 2022). However, it may limit the company's
ability to capitalise on favourable market conditions.

In sum, the fertilizer company must carefully consider all the above factors when developing
its logistics pricing model such as balancing cost-efficiency, speed of delivery, inventory
management, and customer satisfaction for long-term success because a well-executed
logistics strategy can significantly impact the company's profitability and competitiveness in
the market.

1.5. Conclusion
In conclusion, the above sections showed that creating a strong pricing model requires a
careful analysis of numerous interrelated factors, including purchasing raw materials and
delivering products to customers. As such, focusing solely on one component can jeopardize
the entire framework's stability instead, it is crucial to adopt a comprehensive approach that
can effectively handle the complexities of economies of scale, inventory management, and
choosing transportation methods. Moreover, the ever-changing fertilizer industry, with its
varying commodity prices, shifting consumer needs, and unforeseeable geopolitical events,
requires a pricing model that can adjust and endure changes such as the one designed above
because the key to a fertilizer company's success is not just about making as much profit as
possible, but also about building a mutually beneficial connection with farmers and
consumers. Thus, by maximizing efficiency in transportation and utilising a sophisticated
pricing approach outlined in section 1.3, the fertiliser company can support a sustainable
agricultural environment by ensuring prompt and cost-effective supply of necessary
resources, all while protecting their financial well-being.
 REFERENCES
Banerjee, P., and Mishra, M. 2017. Principles of Industrial and Operations Management.

Boyer, K. K., and Hult, G. T. M. 2005. Customer behavioral intentions for online purchases.

Chen, M.C., Wu, P.J. and Hsu, Y.H., 2019. An effective pricing model for the congestion
alleviation of e-commerce logistics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129, pp.368-376.

Choi, T.Y., Netland, T.H., Sanders, N., Sodhi, M.S. and Wagner, S.M., 2023. Just ‐in ‐time for
supply chains in turbulent times. Production and Operations Management, 32(7), pp.2331-
2340.

Chopra, S. and Meindl, P., 2016. Strategy, planning, and operation. Supply Chain
Management, 15(5), pp.71-85.

Grönroos, C. 2007. Service Management and Marketing: Customer Management in Service

Competition.

Hanson, W., 1992. The dynamics of cost‐plus pricing. Managerial and Decision
Economics, 13(2), pp.149-161.

Kong, J., Chen, Z. and Liu, X., 2022. A review of logistics pricing research based on game
theory. Sustainability, 14(17), p.10520.

Li, M. and Mizuno, S., 2022. Comparison of dynamic and static pricing strategies in a dual-
channel supply chain with inventory control. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and
Transportation Review, 165, p.102843.

Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. 1995. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate.
Harvard Business Review.

Rachman, S.H. and Junipriansa, D., 2024. Cost-Plus Pricing Strategy at Hanif Jaya Motor
Workshop Jatibarang-Indramayu. Journal La Bisecoman, 5(4), pp.530-539.

Sanders, N. R., & Premus, R. 2005. Modeling and analysis of supply chain risk factors.

Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. 2008. Designing and Managing the
Supply Chain.