NFEM - Ch06 Conservative Systems
NFEM - Ch06 Conservative Systems
Conservative
Systems
6–1
Chapter 6: CONSERVATIVE SYSTEMS 6–2
§6.1 INTRODUCTION
It was noted in previous Chapters that if a structure and the forces acting upon it collectively form
a conservative mechanical system, the residual force vector r may be expressed as the gradient of
the total potential energy with respect to the state vector:
∂
r= . (6.1)
∂u
6–2
6–3 §6.2 THE LOAD POTENTIAL
Deformed
;
u
;;; ;
F
Undeformed
;;; No change in load
magnitude or direction
In general these forces will be defined by their three components along the axes x, y, z and are more
properly represented by vectors fk . For example, if at location k = 3 we have a force F3 acting in
the y-direction,
0
f3 = F3 . (6.6)
0
Likewise, the displacement of points of application of fk is denoted by vector uk . The vector
generalization of (6.5) is then the sum of n inner products:
n
P= fkT uk . (6.7)
k=1
6–3
Chapter 6: CONSERVATIVE SYSTEMS 6–4
f y (x)
Deformed A B
u y (x)
y
;
;;; ;
x
Undeformed
;;;
Figure 6.2. Structure under under line load f y (x)
(directed upward) over segment AB.
Finally, if all applied force components are collected in the external force vector f (augmented with
zero entries as necessary to be in one-to-one correspondence with the state vector u) then we have
the compact inner-product expression
P = fT u. (6.8)
where u y (x) is the y-displacement component of points on segment (A,B). A similar technique
can be used for volume (body) forces as illustrated in Exercise 6.1.
6–4
6–5 §6.4 THE INTERNAL ENERGY: HOW GEOMETRIC NONLINEARITIES ARISE
;
; 1
k
2
δ
x
REMARK 6.1
Substantial mathematical complications arise if some forces are functions of the displacements. For example,
in slender structures under aerodynamic pressure loads the change of direction of the forces as the structure
deflects may have to be considered in the stability analysis. These so-called “follower” forces, which introduce
force B.C. nonlinearities, are considered later in the course. Suffices to say here that no loads potential P
generally exist in such cases and the system is nonconservative.
Suppose that the spring is fixed at end 1 and that end 2 can move only along the x axis, as in
Figure 6.3. Call u the x displacement of end 2. Then δ = u − 0 = u and the strain energy is
U = 12 ku 2 . According to (6.2) the internal force, which in this case is just the spring axial force p,
is the derivative of U with respect to u:
∂U
p= = ku. (6.11)
∂u
This is linear in the displacement u so nothing has changed so far with respect to linear finite
element analysis.
6–5
Chapter 6: CONSERVATIVE SYSTEMS 6–6
Deformed
uy2
y k
x
ux2
Undeformed
2(x2 ,y2)
Let and d denote the spring lengths in the undeformed and deformed configurations, respectively.
The elongation δ is given by
δ= d − = ( x + x )2 +( y + y )2 − 2
x + 2,
y (6.13)
U = 12 kδ 2 = 12 k( 2
+ 2
d −2 d)
(6.14)
= 12 k (2 2
+2 x x + 2
x +2 y y + 2
y −2 ( x + x) + (
2
y + y) .
2
6–6
6–7 §6.5 INTERNAL ENERGY: ADDITIVITY PROPERTY
The actual expressions of the components in (6.15), which are nonlinear functions of the displace-
ments, are worked out in Exercise 6.2.
The important points that emerge from this example are:
Even for this simple case the exact nonlinear equations are quite nasty, involving irrational functions
of the displacements. The second property, however, shows that approximations to the exact
nonlinear equations may be made when the change in direction is “small” in some sense. This
feature is illustrated in Exercise 6.3.
U = U1 + U2 + . . . + Um . (6.16)
This additivity property is of course general because energies are scalar quantities. It applies to
arbitrary structures decomposed into structural components such as finite elements. Furthermore,
(6.16) is not affected by whether the structure is linear or nonlinear.
The last property explains why finite element equations should be derived from energy functions if
such functions exist. That is not, however, always possible.
6–7
Chapter 6: CONSERVATIVE SYSTEMS 6–8
EXERCISE 6.1
[A:15] A body of volume V and density ρ is in an uniform gravity field g acting along the −z axis. The body
displaces to another position defined by the small-displacement field u(x, y, z). Find the expression of the
load potential P as an integral over the body if the change in shape of the body is negligible.
EXERCISE 6.2
[A:20] Work out the expression of the internal forces for (6.15). Then extend this relation to the three-
dimensional case in which the ends of the spring move by u x1 , u y1 , u z1 , u x2 , u y2 , u z2 in the x, y, z space.
EXERCISE 6.3
[A+N/C:30] Consider the shallow arch model shown in Figure E6.1. This consists of two identical linear
springs of axial stiffness k pinned to each other and to unmoving pinned supports as shown. The springs are
assumed able to resist both tensile and compressive forces. The distance between the supports is 2L. The
undeformed springs form an angle α with the horizontal axis.
The central pin in loaded by a dead vertical force of magnitude f , positive downwards, which is parametrized
as f = λk L. Only symmetrical deformations of the arch are to be considered for this Exercise. Consequently
the system has just one degree of freedom which we take to be the displacement u under the load, also positive
downwards. The response of this system exhibits the snap-through behavior sketched in Figure E6.2.
(a) Show that the internal energy U and load potential P of the two-spring system are given by
2
1 1
U = kL 2
− , P = f u, (E6.1)
cos α cos θ
where θ is the angle shown in Figure E6.1, which is linked to u by the relation tan θ + u/L = tan α.
∂
r (u, λ) = = 0, (E6.2)
∂u
in which = U − P is the total potential energy, and λ = f /(k L) is the dimensionless state parameter.
For convenience rewrite this as
r (µ, λ) = 0, (E6.3)
in terms of the dimensionless state parameter
u
µ= . (E6.4)
L tan α
(c) Derive the exact equation for the limit load parameters
∂λ(µ)
= 0. (E6.5)
∂µ µ=µ
L ,λ=λ L
6–8
6–9 Exercises
u k
k
;; ;;
θ
α
L L
L1
u or µ
L2
(Hint: the exact equation in terms of the angular coordinate θ is cos3 θ L = cos α). Solve this trigonometric
equation1 for the limit-load parameters λ L1 and λ L2 and the dimensionless displacements µ L1 and µ L2
at those points assuming that α = 30◦ .
1 Equation (E6.5) is equivalent to det K = 0 because for a one-DOF system det K = K = ∂λ/∂µ.
6–9
Chapter 6: CONSERVATIVE SYSTEMS 6–10
(d) If the arch initially is and remains sufficiently “shallow” throughout its snap-through behavior, we may
make the small-angle approximations,
Recast the energy, equilibrium equations, and limit load equations in terms of these approximations,
obtaining U as a quartic polynomial in θ , r as a cubic polynomial in θ, etc, then replace in terms of µ.
As a check, the residual equation in terms of λ and µ should be given by (4.16). Calculate the limit load
parameters λ L1 and λ L2 , and the dimensionless displacements
√ µ L1 and µ L2 at those loads. Verify that
these displacements correspond to the angles θ L = ±α/ 3.
(e) Draw the control-state response curves r (µ, λ) = 0, derived using the exact nonlinear equations and
those from the small-angle approximations on the λ, µ plane (as in the sketch of Figure E6.2, going up
to µ ≈ 2.5) for α = 30◦ .
EXERCISE 6.4
[A+N:15] Derive the current stiffness parameter κ defined in Equation (5.8) for the approximate (small-angle)
model of the two-spring arch of Exercise 6.3. Plot the variation of κ(µ) as µ varies from 0 to µ L1 at the first
limit point, with µ along the horizontal axis. Does κ vanish at the limit point?
6–10