Recursivity and Contingency
Recursivity and Contingency
Contingency
Yuk Hui
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or
by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and
retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a
reviewer who may quote passages in a review.
ISBN: HB 978-1-78660-052-3
PB 978-1-78660-053-0
Acknowledgments xi
Preface, by Howard Caygill xiii
ix
Bibliography 279
Index 297
About the Author 319
xi
I left unanswered in the previous two books: first, the Kantian category
of relation that I promised to deal with in On the Existence of Digital
Objects, and second, the notion of organicism that Joseph Needham
developed in relation to his studies of Chinese thought of science and
technology, which I touched upon but did not elaborate further in The
Question Concerning Technology in China. In this respect, this book
could have been titled Specters of Needham.
I terminated this book during a difficult moment of life, when
academic precarity and health issues had to become the quasi causes
of its completion. I want to thank Howard Caygill, to whom I once
promised a book on Kant, for the preface and encouragement; as well
as friends and colleagues who have read and commented upon various
drafts of chapters of this book, in particular Pieter Lemmens, Michäel
Crevoisier, Brian Kuan Wood, Paul Willemarck, Charles Wolfe, Kirill
Chepurin, Martijn Buijs, Louis Morelle, Harry Halpin, Armin Schnei-
der, and Damian Veal, who decided to leave this world soon after he
helped edit the first version of the current work and to whom this book
is forever in debt. I also want to thank the series editors and the editorial
team of Rowman & Littlefield International for having taken care of this
book. Lastly I want to express my gratitude to the support of my family
and friends over the past years, in particular Matthew Fuller, Bernard
Stiegler, and Johnson Chang.
Yuk Hui
Berlin, Summer 2018
Odysseus’s Oar
Yet again
xiii
collective and sometimes forced labor, but it also served to steer and
navigate the ship until the invention of the rudder in the thirteenth cen-
tury. It was the technical object of the helmsman, or cubernetis, who
combined physical skill with information and intelligence in cutting a
path through the sea. Odysseus’s oar was the technical condition for
the capture of energy and for the exercise of the complex skill that is
navigation or the governing of the vessel.
Tiresias’s words also trouble the privilege given to recognition in the
model of recursion. Odysseus will know that he has arrived at his desti-
nation when his oar is not recognized for what it is, when it is mistaken
for a wan or winnowing fan, a technical object used to separate wheat
and chaff in agriculture. In an agrarian culture ignorant of the sea and
its technical objects the oar is mistaken for a winnowing fan. Something
is not quite right, and the countryman sees a mistake—no one carries a
winnowing fan on their shoulder like that—but mistakes the mistake;
it is not so much Odysseus carrying the fan in a strange way as the oar
being mistaken for a fan. And it is here, where the oar sacred to Posei-
don is taken for the winnowing fan sacred to Dionysus—a maritime for
an agrarian technology—that Odysseus is required through sacrifice
to remove the technical object from its contexts and to found a cult to
Poseidon that will surely be confused with one to Dionysus . . . thus
commencing a new and unpredictable history for himself and for the
culture that mistook his oar. The return to where he could not ever pos-
sibly have been gives an air of comedy to Odysseus’s task; he will have
to keep moving, carrying his oar, until he becomes so unfamiliar that he
and his technology can be understood and explained otherwise.
Yuk Hui’s book works within the parameters of this other recursion;
it explores uncompletable returns and resumptions through the role of
contingency in these movements. Through a looping recursive series
of readings of Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy, physiology and
cybernetics, Gaia theory and Anthropocene discourse, he makes unfa-
miliar what we thought we knew and describes settings and sequences
that disrupt the canons and protocols of reading with which we are
familiar. He hints that we don’t know what we thought we knew—sys-
tematicity and protocols of recursive argumentation—and that we need
to know other things—the philosophy of organism and organology—in
other ways. In all this contingency is paramount, but it is not Louis
Pasteur’s chance favoring a prepared mind, but one for which there
can be no preparation and that cannot be easily anticipated or captured.
As with Odysseus taking to the land with his oar, there is a certain
renunciation, even embrace of absurdity at play here, a refusal to feel
at home that extends even to technics itself. The cosmotechnics that is
the object of this and other of Yuk Hui’s works is exemplified by the
surprise of the countryman who sees the oar differently. The technical
object or Odysseus’s oar becomes questionable in intense, uncanny, and
disturbing ways.
There is finally an emancipatory impulse informing these open-ended
movements driven by contingent events and errors that keeps open a
future for Yuk Hui’s thought. Yet it is beleaguered, for when faced
with James Hutton’s deep time with its annals of past worlds, the con-
tingency of journeying with an oar through the countryside sinks into an
insignificance from which not even the moral law can save us. Yuk Hui
knows that the sediment left by the human occupation of the planet will
barely register on the geological record and is rightly skeptical of the
hubris on anthropocene discourse that imagines that human technology
can ever match the levels of destructive havoc that the planet has regu-
larly visited upon itself. Yet this is the occasion not for an apocalyptic
despair but for a measured and hopeful approach to technology, a new
way of putting the question concerning technology. Recursivity and
Contingency takes the remarkable adventure of thought begun in On the
Existence of Digital Objects and The Question Concerning Technology
in China in unexpected and astonishing directions, leaving its readers
with much to think about and to take further themselves.
Howard Caygill