The Path To Progress - Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Agonists, Individualized Care, and Overcoming Goal-Directed Medical Therapy Barriers in Diabetes and CKD
The Path To Progress - Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Agonists, Individualized Care, and Overcoming Goal-Directed Medical Therapy Barriers in Diabetes and CKD
The Path To Progress - Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Agonists, Individualized Care, and Overcoming Goal-Directed Medical Therapy Barriers in Diabetes and CKD
with type 2 diabetes. In addition to The 2024 KDIGO clinical practice is multifaceted. Frequently cited
positive primary end point CV guidelines for patients with CKD barriers include limited kidney
outcomes, secondary outcomes and diabetes lists the following as disease education among patients
revealed reduced risk of new or recommended goal-directed medical and providers, low CKD aware-
worsening nephropathy.2 In a post therapy (GDMT): metformin and ness, clinical inertia, poly-
hoc analysis published in Kidney SGLT2i, followed by nonsteroidal pharmacy, cost, disparities in
International Reports, Tuttle et al.3 mineralocorticoid receptor antago- underserved populations, lack of
sought to assess treatment effects nists in those with persistent albu- public policy on health equity, and
of once weekly semaglutide versus minuria >30 mg/g despite other fragmented care.8 Surmounting
placebo on kidney outcomes by standard-of-care therapies, and these barriers will take a coordi-
KDIGO risk category and on GLP-1RA in those not achieving nated effort between health sys-
changes in KDIGO risk category, individualized glycemic targets tems and communities,
using the SUSTAIN 6 trial patient despite standard-of-care therapies interdisciplinary care; and local,
cohorts. The values were pooled (1B evidence).5 Populations that fall national, and global initiatives
by treatment and stratified into 4 within the high and very high risk aimed to educate and create CKD
subgroups by KDIGO risk cate- KDIGO categories are associated awareness.
gory, which included low risk, with the highest burden of disease, At the level of the provider,
moderate risk, high risk, and very have the greatest risk of disease patients often receive fragmented
high risk. The results revealed that progression, and seem to benefit the care caused by the siloed care
regardless of CKD severity, once greatest with rapid implementation models found in many health care
weekly semaglutide participants of GDMT. Incorporating standard- delivery systems, where providers
experienced a positive treatment of-care interventions such as GLP- practice independent of one
effect in the composite kidney end 1RA does not only reduce progres- another. In the setting of advanced
point. Importantly, the greatest sion of kidney disease; they reduce diabetic kidney disease, where
benefit was observed at the highest risk of CV progression and death. primary care physicians, nephrol-
risk categories. A similar trend was Utilizing KDIGO risk categories in ogists, cardiologists, and other
observed in estimated glomerular patient care enable practitioners to specialists provide overlapping
filtration rate slope, which individualize CKD risk assessment, care, providers can fall victim to
revealed a smaller decline in the prioritizing those with greatest “stay in your lane” mentalities.
semaglutide cohort, which was need and urgency in GDMT This is a form of clinical inertia
numerically smaller in the highest implementation. whereby crucial GDMT such as
risk categories. Participants Unfortunately, the known benefit SGLT2i and GLP-1RA can be
receiving semaglutide were more of GLP-1RA and other GDMT in delayed. In any disease with
likely to move to a lower KDIGO CKD and diabetes has not translated increasing complexity, clinical
risk category and less likely to into widespread implementation of inertia is magnified. We call it a
move to a higher KDIGO risk these practices. A cross-sectional “medical complexity care conun-
category. As expected, changes in study in the veterans’ health drum” when increased disease
urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio administration between 2019 and complexity and comorbid condi-
were the primary drivers for 2020 revealed that 10.7% and 7.7% tions necessitate an increased
regression of KDIGO risk category of patients were prescribed an number of involved specialists.
in both semaglutide and placebo SGLT2i or a GLP-1RA, respec- With increased complexity, pri-
groups. However, uniquely iden- tively.6 Data from the centers for mary care physician and specialist
tified, change in estimated disease control and prevention show care responsibility overlap
glomerular filtration rate was the that older adults, women, and non- whereby everyone, or no one is
main driver for progression of Hispanic White patients are more responsible, and deferral of patient
KDIGO category in both semaglu- likely to be prescribed SGLT2i, management decisions is common.
tide and placebo groups. A post hoc GLP-1RA, or DPP-4 inhibitor In addition, increased subspecialist
analyses SGTL2i EMPA-REG compared to other ages, male visit frequency competes with time
OUTCOME randomized controlled gender, and race/ethnicities; how- and motivation to attend primary
trial demonstrated similar wide- ever, they were still only prescribed care physician visits. The sum ef-
spread renal protective benefits in 21.3%, 17.8%, and 20.4% of fect is a greater number of physi-
across KDIGO risk categories with those cohorts, respectively.7 cians involved in patient care;
the greatest benefit observed in the Reasons for the lackluster however, an overall reduction in
higher risk cohorts.4 adoption of these important GDMT coordinated care whereby patient
2 Kidney International Reports (2024) -, -–-
SL Ambruso and MR Weir: Individualizing GLP-1RA Care and Overcoming GDMT Barriers COMMENTARY
Figure 1. The medical complexity care conundrum is a phenomenon observed with increasing disease complexity, which results in a pro-
portional increase in the number of physicians (primary care physician and specialists) providing patient care. Competing appointment time,
siloed medical care, and “stay in your lane” mentalities result in fragmented care and clinical inertia whereby delays in care decisions, reduced
care coordination, and a loss of patient ownership occurs.
ownership is not claimed Vitor, NovoNordisk, and Boehringer 5. Floege J, Jayne DRW, Sanders JSF,
(Figure 1). Using the example of Ingelheimer. Tesar V, Rovin BH. Corrigendum to
“KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guide-
diabetes management in diabetic
line for the Management of Anti-
kidney disease, optimized glyce- REFERENCES neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody
mic control and GDMT can be (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis.”. Kid-
1. Perkovic V, Tuttle KR, Rossing P, et al.
delayed for months to years while Effects of Semaglutide on chronic ney Int. 2024;105:S71–S116. https://
waiting for another provider to kidney disease in patients with type 2 doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2024.04.003
begin or adjust therapy. As ne- diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2024. https:// 6. Lamprea-Montealegre JA, Madden E,
phrologists, we should acknowl- doi.org/10.1056/NEJM0a2403347. E Tummalapalli SL, et al. Association of
pub ahead of print. race and ethnicity with prescription of
edge that we have a responsibility
to close this gap, dismantle “stay 2. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Out- agonists among patients with type 2
in your lane” mentalities and diabetes in the Veterans Health
comes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
expand patient care roles such as N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–1844. Administration system. JAMA.
diabetes management, which in- https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141 2022;328:861–871. https://doi.org/10.
cludes GLP-1RA therapies. 1001/jama.2022.13885
3. Tuttle KR, Bain SC, Bosch-Traberg H,
Furthermore, we can begin tearing et al. Effects of once-weekly sem- 7. Centers for Disease Control and Pre-
down the familiar compartmental- aglutide on kidney disease outcomes vention. Chronic Kidney Disease in
ized care platform and build by KDIGO Risk category in the SUS- the United States. Atlanta, GA: US
TAIN 6 trial. Kidney International Re- Department of Health and Human
interdisciplinary care models
ports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2 Services, Centers for Disease Control
aimed to provide a team-approach 024.04.028 and Prevention; 2023.
for optimized GDMTs. 4. Weingold R, Zinman B, Mattheus M, 8. Nee R, Yuan CM, Narva AS, Yan G,
et al. Shifts in KDIGO CKD risk groups Norris KC. Overcoming barriers to
DISCLOSURE with empagliflozin: Kidney-protection implementing new guideline-directed
from SGLT2 inhibition across the therapies for chronic kidney disease.
SLA is a scientific advisor to spectrum of risk. J Diabetes Compli- Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023;38:532–
AstraZeneca. MRW is a scientific cations. 2023;37:108628. https://doi. 541. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/
advisor to Bayer, AstraZeneca, CLS org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2023.108628 gfac283