MSW-006

Social Work Research

Indira Gandhi
National Open University
School of Social Work

Block

1
BASICS OF RESEARCH IN SOCIAL WORK
UNIT 1
Introduction of Social Work Research 5
UNIT 2
Research Review in Social Work 21
UNIT 3
Research Process I: Formulation of Research Problem 37
UNIT 4
Research Process II: Preparing a Research Proposal 53
COURSE INTRODUCTION
Social work is a practice based profession. In order to search answers to questions
raised regarding instructions or treatment effectiveness in social work practice,
research is essential. The present course, comprising of four Blocks that
incorporate sixteen units, deals with social work research. The ultimate purpose
of the course is building a knowledge base for social work theory and practice.
In Block 1, Basics of research in social work have been described. Major issues
such as foundations of scientific research, research review in social work,
formulation of research problem and preparing a research proposal are articulated
very carefully in this block.
Block 2 is on ‘Research Methods in Social Work’. It has enumerated and
explained in detail several important methods such as descriptive, exploratory,
diagnostic, evaluation and action research and experimental research and qualitative
research. The block has also described some special research methods that are
known as intervention research methods. These methods are commonly known
as single-subject designs research, through which social researchers attempt to
improve social functioning of individuals, groups, families and communities.
Block 3 gives an overview of tools and methods of data collection. Unit 1 is
about the concept of population, sample and methods of sampling. Subsequent
units have focused on various research tools like questionnaire, rating scales,
attitudinal scales, interview schedule and data collection procedure.
Once data are collected, the researcher turns his/her focus on scientific processing.
The last block has the details of data processing and analysis. It narrates how
to code data, prepare master chart, re-categorize and tabulate information and
make univariate, bivariate and trivariate analysis. This block has also stated very
exhaustively the use of descriptive statistics and inferential statistics before
describing how to write a research report.
The above cited four blocks will provide you necessary information on the
concept, importance and various methods of social work research and also will
make you efficient and capable to carry out the same in a time bound manner.
Learning of this unit will be helpful to you to carry out a dissertation for MSW/
M.Phil and Ph. D in Social Work.
BLOCK INTRODUCTION
The course on Social Work Research consists of four blocks. Block 1 is on ^’Basics
of Research in Social Work”. This block has four units. Unit 1 is on Introduction
to Social Work Research. This unit provides the foundatiorvof your research
activity in social work. In this unit extensive coverage has been given to the meaning
of research, scientific research, use of scientific method in social sciences and meaning
of social work research. It also provides information on the nature of the social work
research and scope of social work research.
Unit 2 is on Research Review in Social Work. This unit deals with review of
research in social work: international perspective and national perspective; emerging
trends, role of research in social work; programme evaluation, and role of NGOs
in research.
Unit 3 is on Research Process I: Formulation of Research Problem. This unit
provides information on research process, formation of research problem, evaluation
of problem, importance of hypothesis and various types of hypothesis in research
Unit 4 is on Research Process II: Preparing a Research Proposal. It deals
with how to prepare a research proposal and provides details about identification
oTobjectives7 selection of samples, methods of data collection, data analysis and the
presentation of report.
The units of this block have been purposely selected to acquaint you with various
aspects of research which can be used in an empirical study. The information in this
will become useful when you plan and carry out the dissertation for MSW (2nd
year).
UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL
WORK RESEARCH
Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Meaning of Research and Scientific Research
1.3 Scientific Method
1.4 Meaning of Social Research and Social Work Research
1.5 Nature of Social Work Research
1.6 Scope of Research in Social Work
1.7 Let Us Sum Up
1.8 Check Your Progress: The Key
1.9 Further Readings and References

1.0 OBJECTIVES
On the completion of this Unit, you should be able to:
 explain the meaning and importance of social work research;
 describe the nature of social work research; and
 identify the areas of social work in which research is being increasingly
undertaken.

1.1 INTRODUCTION
Research is a process by which one acquires authentic and reliable information
about a phenomenon. It may be broadly defined “as a systematic inquiry towards
understanding a social phenomenon”. It follows the scientific approach to gain
knowledge. The most important characteristic of this approach is its thrust on
objectivity. To what extent is the research using scientific approach useful in studying
the problems of society? How can we acquire reliable knowledge about the various
aspects of human experience? To be more specific, how can the scientific approach
be of value in understanding social phenomena? In this Chapter we will discuss these
questions. Our approach would be first, to understand the meaning of the terms
‘research’ and ‘scientific research’ then to examine the scientific method, its application
in social work, its assumptions and finally to take a close look at the approach to
find out how it can help social work professionals to solve the problems they face
while practicing social work.

1.2 MEANING OF RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC

RESEARCH
Research
When we observe certain objects or phenomena, we are often unaware of our
biases, we do not question them and so we attribute our observations entirely to the
5
Basics of Research objects or phenomena being observed. In this process, it is possible to arrive at right
in Social Work
decision on the basis of wrong reasons or vice versa. This questions the process of
observation. Was the observation error-free? While observing are we aware of our
limitations? Every method of knowing has certain limitations. Any study to create
new knowledge or aiming to increase existing body of knowledge – may be through
observation or by some other methods, is called research. As such, research may
be described as systematic and critical investigation of phenomena toward increasing
the stream of knowledge.
Scientific Research
Science aims at description, explanation and understanding of various objects or
phenomena in nature. Research is a special endeavour, which involves systematic
and critical investigation towards increasing the stream of knowledge. Now it is
easier to define scientific research. We may define scientific research as a “systematic
and critical investigation about the natural phenomena to describe, explain and finally
to understand the relations among them”.
Check Your Progress 1
Define the terms ‘research’ and ‘scientific research’.
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
Conceptual Foundations of Scientific Research
The scientific research is based on two conceptual foundations, namely, facts and
theory. In the context of scientific research, fact simply means some phenomenon
that has been observed. Scientific research aims at systematic description of observed
facts and of their mutual relations. It also aims at understanding their nature and
interprets the observed facts and relations. This involves the reduction of observed
facts and their relations into a limited number of general statements that account for
the observed facts and their relations. These general statements embody a theory
(Mohsin 1984 p 4).

6
There is little agreement among social scientists on what theory is. For example, Introduction to Social
Work Research
according to Goode and Hatt (1952); a theory refers to the relationship between
facts or the ordering of them in some meaningful ways, whereas to Kerlinger (1973),
a theory is a set of interrelated constructs (concepts), definitions and propositions
that present a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables,
with the purpose of explaining and predicting the phenomena.
There are many more explanations of what a theory is. Despite the disagreement,
there are certain common points in almost all the explanations. Keeping this in view
we can understand a theory as a systematic explanation for the observed facts and
their interrelations.
Facts and Theory
Scientific research starts with facts and then moves towards theorising. To be useful,
facts must be organised, and the primary purpose of the scientific method is to
develop a mechanism of organising the facts as they accumulate and become
meaningful from the standpoint of their objectives. Through empirical investigations,
scientists gather many facts. As these facts accumulate, there is a need for integration,
organisation and classification in order to make the isolated findings meaningful.
When isolated facts are put in a perspective by integrating them into a conceptual
scheme, which promotes greater understanding, we approach the domain of science.
Significant relationship in the data must be identified and explained. In other words,
theories must be formulated.
Theory knits together the results of observations, enabling scientists to make general
statements about variables and relationships among them. For example, in Boyle’s
Law, a familiar generalisation summarises the observed effects of change(s) in
temperature on the volumes of all gases by the statements – “When pressure is held
constant, as the temperature of a gas increases, its volume is increased and as
temperature of a gas is decreased its volume is decreased”. This statement of theory
not only summarises previous information, but also predicts other phenomena by
telling us what to expect of any gas under change(s) in temperature.
Just as fact underlies theory, theories underlie facts – each raising the other like a
spiral to an increasingly precise scientific formulation. Facts derive their significance
from theoretical framework into which they bring facts into focus. This is well stated
by Van Dalen (1973) :
“….there is a constant and intricate relationship between facts and theory.
Facts without theory or theory without facts lack significance. Facts
take their significance from the theories which define, classify and predict
them. Theories possess significance when they are built upon, classified,
and tested by facts. Thus, the growth of science is dependent upon the
accumulation of facts and the formulation of new or broader theories.”
This is particularly true in the early stages of scientific development. In its early stage,
research must confine its efforts to seeking answers to highly specific and
particularised problems. In the later stage, it tends to strive towards unity by breaking
down the very barriers that had made its earlier progress possible. Scientific theories
attempt to organise the tiny, rigorously defined bits of knowledge into a more
meaningful and realistic structure. This is precisely the function of theory.
7
Basics of Research Inductive and Deductive uses of theory: Theory can influence the research process
in Social Work
using either inductive or deductive process. Inductive process has a researcher
beginning with observations and generates tentative conclusions. The other one is the
deductive process in which a researcher begins with a theory, then derives hypothesis
and ultimately collects observations to test the hypothesis.
Purpose of Theory
There are several purposes to be served by a theory in the development of science.
We shall briefly consider three of them here. First, theory summarizes and puts in
order the existing knowledge in a particular area. It permits deeper understanding
of data and translates empirical findings into a more easily retainable and adaptable
form. The theory of oxidation for instance, places into focus many of the chemical
reactions common to everyday life.
Secondly, theory provides a provisional explanation for observed events and
relationships. It identifies the variables that are related and the nature of their
relationships. A theory of learning, for example, could explain the relationship between
the speed and efficiency of learning and such other variables as motivation, reward
and practice.
Lastly, theory permits the prediction of the occurrence of phenomena and enables
the investigator to postulate and, eventually, to discover hitherto unknown phenomena.
At the time when the ‘Periodic Table’ was being completed, for instance, certain
gaps were noted in the sequence of the elements. Since theory provides that, there
should have been no gaps, scientists were spurred on to look for the other missing
elements. In time, these were found, anticipated by theory. Theory, therefore,
stimulates the development of new knowledge by providing the lead for further
inquiry.
Developing a Theory
It is important to stress that good theories are not born out of imagination; they do
not originate merely through arm chair reflection. A theory is built upon collected
facts. The investigator then searches, makes intelligent guesses as to how the facts
are ordered, adds missing ideas or links, and puts forward a hypothesis; deduces
what consequence should follow from the hypothesis and looks for further facts
which are consistent or otherwise with the deductions; builds a wider generalisation
or conceptual framework on more facts and eventually outlines a theory. Theories
are solidly based on evidence. And they are important practical tools which enable
us to advance our knowledge still further. Once a theoretical framework has been
elaborated, we know what facts to look for to confirm or to deny the theory. Also,
we have a conceptual framework inside with which our evidence can be tested.
Theories always involve terms that refer to matters that cannot be directly observed.
For example, gravity itself cannot be directly observed, though the effects of gravity
can be. Gravity and gravitation are both theoretical terms. The terms of a theory or
theoretical statement are sometimes referred to as constructs. Thus, many theories
of learning refer to a motivational factor in behaviour. Now motivation is not directly
observable. It is a theoretical term. Or, we may say that it is a construct. The term
implies that it is a construction of the scientist’s imagination.

8
 Introduction to Social
Check Your Progress 2 Work Research

Describe briefly the role of theory in scientific research.

..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................

1.3 SCIENTIFIC METHOD

It is obvious that it would be impossible to comprehend the nature and content of
research without an appreciation of method. The method used in scientific research
is usually designated as scientific method. According to George Lundberg (1946),
scientific method consists of three basic steps, systematic observation, classification
and interpretation of data. Through these steps, scientific method brings about not
only verifiability of the facts, but also it lays the confidence in the validity of
conclusions. Rubin and Babbie (2010) define scientific method as an approach to
inquiry that attempts to safeguard against errors commonly made in casual human
inquiry. cheif features include viewing all knowledge as provisional and subject to
refutation, searching for evidence based on systematic and comprehensive
observation, pursuing objectivity in observation, and replicating studies.
The definition requires some more explanations. First when Lundberg (1946) says
that scientific method is systematic observation, he means, the scientific investigation
is ordered. It aims at discovering facts as they actually are and not as they are
desired to be and as such, the investigators can have critical confidence in their
conclusions. Second, the scientific method is concerned with ‘classes of objects’ not
‘individual objects’ especially universality and predictability. The method makes it
possible to predict about a phenomenon with sufficient accuracy.
The major characteristics of scientific method are:
 Objectivity,
 Verifiability.
 Replication and
 Prediction. 9
Basics of Research Let us look at these characteristics more closely:
in Social Work
Objectivity
The most important characteristic of scientific method is objectivity. Research is
beyond the subjective bias of the researcher. The researcher makes deliberate efforts
to eliminate personal bias and prejudices and resists the temptation to seek only such
data that supports his/her hypothesis. The emphasis is on testing, rather than proving
the hypothesis. The researcher is prohibited to make personal judgement. Instead it
uses the data and logic that lead to a sound conclusion. Objectivity is achieved
through standardisation of research instruments and analytical tools.
Verifiability
This is another characteristic of scientific method. Research findings presented for
other researchers must be verifiable. Research is a scientific endeavour and hence
its findings are open to scrutiny. This characteristic of scientific method, i.e. verifiability,
is related to the criteria of objectivity. That is, a study which is based on objective
facts can be verified. Verifiability is achieved through two different approaches: first,
analysing the same data on the same sample through alternative analytical tools
(statistical methods); second, replicating the study on a different sample.
Replication
The third characteristic of scientific method is ‘replication’. Only through replication
of a research study the conclusions/results can be confirmed. As such, through the
use of scientific method it is possible to replicate the study and verify the results.
Only if the research has been carried out by using a scientific method, it can be
replicated for verification.
Prediction
Prediction is achieved through the uses of statistical methods and techniques. For
example, regression analysis is the most common statistical procedure in quantitative
research which predicts about the phenomena under study.
Check Your Progress 3
Describe briefly the characteristics of scientific method.
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................

10 ..........................................................................................................................
Use of Scientific Method in Social Science Introduction to Social
Work Research
Social sciences primarily deal with human behaviour, which is, by and large, complex
and dynamic in nature. One cannot, therefore, investigate the human behaviour under
guided conditions as in natural and physical sciences. This creates many problems
for the researcher such as the problems of subjectivity and individualistic
generalisations etc.
The problems arising out of the nature and content of social sciences do not seriously
diminish the importance of scientific method for social scientists. Not withstanding
the inherent defects of social sciences, scientific method can be acceptable with its
own limitations for the study of social phenomena so far as it helps to arrive at valid
generalisations.
Possibilities and Limitations of Use of Scientific Method in Social Sciences
As described above, the social sciences deal with human beings. Hence, the subject
of scientific research poses much greater complexity than that in natural sciences.
Although problems of discovering principles of human behaviour are difficult, they
are not impossible. Social scientists will need to carry out observations as carefully
as in natural sciences. Subjective, qualitative judgements need to be supplemented
by more exact, quantitative measurements which are not easy to achieve in the case
of human beings.
Social sciences have not been able to establish generalisations equivalent to theories
of the natural sciences or, to predict events or behaviours accurately. Perhaps, social
sciences will never realise the objective of science as completely as natural sciences
do. In fact, there are several limitations involved in the application of the scientific
method in social sciences.
Check Your Progress 4
Describe briefly the limitations of use of scientific method in social sciences.
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................

11
Basics of Research
in Social Work 1.4 MEANING OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND
SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH
Social Research
The object of social research is clearly the discovery of causal relationships in human
behaviour. It is generally acknowledged that in human behaviour, as much as in
natural phenomena, a large degree of measurable and predictable sets of associations
occur. Social research, then, like research in physical and natural sciences, seeks to
establish, measure, analyse these associations in all their variety and intensity (Thomas,
1968, p.294). Social research, however assumes a distinct character of its own in
a significant measure when it comes to the application of scientific process as in
natural sciences, to social phenomena. Unlike, physical and natural sciences, in
social research the objects are conscious and active human beings. The individual
behaviour of the objects whether it is free or determined makes the social research
really a difficult job. Further, the researcher and object being similar, the scope of
an objective approach in social research is limited to a considerable extent.
Social research concerns with social data, which are much more complex than
physical data. The basis of all social interactions, whether it is a large complex group
or a small cohesive group, is expectations of behaviour, which in turn is result of
many factors. The complex nature of social data reduces the power of exact prediction
in social research. Most of the subject matter of social research is qualitative and
does not admit quantitative measurement. It is more so, because social phenomena
are known only symbolically through concepts or terms representing such phenomena.
Social Research Process
The research process is the operational part of a research project. In a research
project, there are various scientific activities in which researcher engages in order to
produce knowledge. Although each research project is unique in some ways, all
projects, regardless of the phenomenon being studied, involve, by and large, some
common activities, which are interdependent. The research process is thus the system
of these interrelated activities. The various activities are conveniently grouped into
six stages as shown in Figure given below.

Formulation of a Problem

Generalisation and
Theory Building
Formulation of
Hypothesis

Analysis and Interpre-

tation of Data Formulation of Re-
search Design
Collection of Data

Social Work Research

12 Social work research is the application of research methods to the production of
knowledge that social workers need to solve problems they confront in the practice Introduction to Social
Work Research
of social work. The knowledge is useful in appraising the effectiveness of methods
and techniques of social work. It provides information that can be taken into
consideration by social workers prior to making decisions, that affect their clients,
programmes or agencies such as use of alternative intervention techniques or change
or modification of programme, and so forth.
Social work research offers an opportunity for all social workers to make a difference
or modification in their practice. There is no doubt about the fact that a social
worker will be a more effective practitioner guided by the findings of social work
research. Thus, social work research seeks to accomplish the same humanistic
goals, as does a social work method. Social work research deals with those methods
and issues, which are useful in evaluating social work programmes and practices. It
explains the methodology of social research and illustrates its applications in social
work settings.
Goal of Social Work Research
Social work is an action oriented profession. As such, the major objective of social
work research is to search for answers to questions raised regarding interventions
or treatment-effectiveness in social work practice. In other words social work research
attempts to provide knowledge about what interventions or treatments really help or
hinder the attainment of social work goals. In addition, it also helps in searching for
answers to problems or difficulties faced by social work practitioners in the practice
of their profession. Ultimately, it helps building a knowledge base for social work
theory and practice.
Social Work Research Process
Social work research starts with problem identification and setting up of goals. This
is followed by the process of assessment (or need assessment) of the clients problems.
After the problem is identified and needs are assessed, the next step is to set up
goals to be achieved. The goals are required to be specific, precisely defined and
measurable in some way. The third step in the process is to have a pre-intervention
measurement, that is, measurement prior to intervention. The pre-intervention
measurement is used as basis from which to compare the client’s condition after the
intervention has been introduced.

Identification of Problem

Inferences
Need Assessment

Selection of Social Work

Research Design

Post-Intervention Pre-Intervention
Measurement Measurement
Intervention

13
Basics of Research Social Work Research Process
in Social Work
Next stage in the process is to introduce intervention. It is important here to note
that only a single, coherent intervention be applied during any intervention phase. In
the last stage, we assess the effects of intervention by comparing the two
measurements, that is, pre-intervention measurement and measurements after
intervention.
Check Your Progress 5
Describe the meaning of social work research.
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................

1.5 NATURE OF SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH

Social work research primarily deals with problems, faced by professional social
workers, social work agencies and community in its concern with social work
functions. In other words, in social work research the problems to be investigated
are always found in the course of doing social work or planning to do it (Dasgupta,
1968).
It is very obvious that in social work research the study of a problem is from the
point of view professional social work practise. The designing of research, problems,
data collection and its interpretation will have to be attempted in a manner as would
be useful to professional social work which would add new knowledge to the social
work theory and practice and improve the efficiency of professional social workers.
Social work research mostly draws its inferences through inductive reasoning. That
is, inferring something about a whole group or a class of objects from the facts or
knowledge of one or few members of that group or class. Thus, in social work
research, inductive reasoning carries us from observation to theory through
intervention/assessment. Practitioners, for example, may observe that delinquents
tend to come from families with low socio-economic status. Based on the assumption
that the parent-child bond is weaker in low socio-economic families and that such
parents, therefore, have less control over their children, the practitioners may
inductively conclude that a weak parent-child bond leads to delinquency.
A substantive part of social work practice is concerned with the micro-level practice,
such as working with individuals, groups, or a community. Social work research has
14 to take into consideration the limitations of micro level design of study and techniques.
Social work research lays special emphasis on evaluation. This is one of the reasons Introduction to Social
Work Research
that social work research is also understood as evaluative research. Under social
work research, varieties of evaluative researches are undertaken. Some of the
researches are on impacts or effects, efficacy and effectiveness. Evaluation of agencies
and its projects and programmes are some of the specialized areas of social work
research.
Check Your Progress 6
Describe the nature of social work research.
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................

1.6 SCOPE OF RESEARCH IN SOCIAL WORK

While on the theoretical side, social work research re-examines the special body of
knowledge, concepts and theories and tries to evolve a systematic theory and valid
concepts in the area of social work practice. Social work research may be conducted
to know the efficacy of different methods of social work as to search for alternate
interventions and treatments.
Identification of social work needs and resources, evaluation of governmental
programmes and services, evaluation of programmes and services of social work
agencies, are some of the areas in which social work researches are undertaken.
Social work research may be conducted to know the problems faced by professional
social workers in social work agencies and communities in their concern with social
work functions. Thus, social work research embraces the entire gamut of social
work profession: concepts, theories, methods, programmes, services and the problems
faced by social workers in their practice. It focusses on micro, mezzo and macro
areas of intervention.
Social work research typically focuses on assessment of practitioner’s work with
individuals, groups, families communities or appraisal of agencies or programmes
that involve the continued efforts of practitioners with many clients. As such, the
research design, data collection and analytic strategies in social work research vary
as a function of unit of analysis and programme of agencies of social work practitioner.
It focuses on or confines itself to select aspects of behaviour and alternate modes
of behaviour modifications. It helps to find ways and means to enhance social
functioning at the individual, group, community and societal levels. 15
Basics of Research When the focus of research is on concepts, principles, theories underlying social
in Social Work
work methods and skills, social work research is known as intervention research.
It also involves the study of the relationship of social workers with their clients:
individuals, groups or communities on various levels of interaction or therapy as well
as their natural relationships and functioning within the organizational structure of
social agencies.
The areas of social work research may be broadly categorized as follows:
1) Studies to establish, identify and measure the need for service.
2) To measure the services offered as they relate to needs
3) To test, gauge and evaluate results of social work intervention.
4) To list the efficacy of specific techniques of offering services.
5) Studies in methodology of social work.
Social work is a diverse profession and possible broad research areas could be:
i) Community Development,
ii) Environment,
iii) Child Welfare,
iv) Women Welfare,
v) Youth Welfare
vi) Aged Welfare,
vii) Substance Abuse,
viii) Poverty alleviation,
ix) Mental retardation,
x) Juvenile Delinquency,
xi) Crime and Corrections,
xii) Public Health,
xiii) Disability
xiv) Migration
The list is not exhaustive. It is only illustrative which enlists broad areas which are
very frequently studied by social workers. Again, within one or more problem-
areas, research might focus on individuals, families, groups, community organizations
or broad social systems. It might deal with characteristics of a larger population, and
the services available to them.

1.7 LET US SUM UP

Any study to create new knowledge or aims to increase existing fund of knowledge,
may it be through observation or by some other methods, is called research. Whereas
scientific research is a systematic and critical investigation about the natural phenomena
to describe, explain and finally to understand the relations among them.
16
Scientific research starts with facts and then moves towards theorising. Theory may Introduction to Social
Work Research
be defined as “a set of interrelated constructs (concepts), definitions and propositions
that present a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables,
with the purpose of predicting and explaining the phenomena.
There are several purposes to be served by a theory in the development of science.
First, theory summarises and puts in order the existing knowledge in a particular
area. Secondly, theory provides a provisional explanation for observed events and
relationships. Lastly, theory permits the prediction of the occurrence of phenomena
and enables the investigator to postulate and eventually, to discover hitherto unknown
phenomena.
Scientific method consists of three basic steps: systematic observation, classification
and interpretation of data. The major characteristics of scientific method are:
Objectivity, Verifiability, Replication and Prediction.
The aim of social research is to discover causal relationships in human behaviour. It
is generally believed that in human behaviour, as much as in natural phenomena, a
large degree of measurable and predictable sets of associations occur. Social research,
then, seeks to establish, measure and analyse these associations in all their variety
and intensity.
Social work research is the application of research methods to the production of
knowledge that social workers need to solve problems they confront in the practice
of social work. The knowledge is useful in appraising the effectiveness of methods
and techniques of social work.
The major objective of social work research is to search for answers to questions
raised regarding interventions or treatment—effectiveness in social work practice.
Social work research mostly draws its inferences through inductive reasoning. That
is, inferring something from the facts. Thus, in social work research inductive reasoning
carries us from observation to theory through intervention/assessment. A substantive
part of social work practice is concerned with the micro-level practice, such as
working with individuals, groups or a community. Social work research lays special
emphasis on evaluation.
Social work research typically focuses on assessment of practitioner’s work with
individuals, groups, families communities or appraisal of agencies or programmes
that involve the continued efforts of practitioners with many clients.
The areas of social work research may be broadly categorized as : studies to identify
and measure the need for service; studies to measure the services offered as they
relate to needs; studies to test, gauge and evaluate results of social work intervention;
studies to list the efficacy of specific techniques of offering services and studies in
methodology of social work.

1.8 CHECK YOUR PROGRESS: THE KEY

Check Your Progess 1
Any study to create new knowledge or which aims to increase existing fund of
knowledge — may it be through observation or by some other methods, is called
research. As such, research may be defined as systematic and critical investigation
of phenomena toward increasing the stream of knowledge. We may define scientific 17
Basics of Research research as a systematic and critical investigation about the natural phenomena to
in Social Work
describe, explain and finally to understand the relations among them.
Check Your Progress 2
Theory summarises and puts in order the existing knowledge in a particular area. It
permits deeper understanding of data and translates empirical findings. It also provides
a provisional explanation for observed events and relationships. Theory permits the
prediction of the occurrence of phenomena and enables the investigator to postulate
and, eventually, to discover hitherto unknown phenomena. Theory, therefore, plays
a significant role in scientific research by providing a sound theoretical framework
for further inquiry.
Check Your Progress 3
Scientific method consists of three basic steps; systematic observation, classification
and interpretation of data. The major characteristics of scientific method are:
Objectivity, Verifiability, Replication and Prediction.
Check Your Progress 4
There are several limitation involved in the application of the scientific method in
social sciences. Some of the important limitations are: complexity of subject matter,
difficulties in observation, difficulties in replication, interaction between an observer
and subjects, difficulties in control and problems of measurement.
Check Your Progress 5
Social work research is the application of research methods to the production of
knowledge that social workers need to solve problems they confront in the practice
of social work. The knowledge is useful in appraising the effectiveness of methods
and techniques of social work.
Check Your Progress 6
Social work research mostly draws its inferences through inductive reasoning; that
is, inferring something from the facts. Thus, in social work research inductive reasoning
carries us from observation to theory through intervention/assessment. A substantive
part of social work practice is concerned with the micro-level practice, such as
working with individuals, groups, or a community. Social work research lays special
emphasis on evaluation.
Check Your Progress 7
The broad areas of research in social work may be categorised as follows:
i) Community Development,
ii) Environment,
iii) Child Welfare,
iv) Women Welfare,
v) Youth Welfare
vi) Aged Welfare,

18 vii) Substance Abuse,

viii) Poverty alleviation, Introduction to Social
Work Research
ix) Mental retardation,
x) Juvenile Delinquency,
xi) Crime and Corrections,
xii) Public Health,
xiii) Disability
xiv) Migration

1.9 FURTHER READINGS AND REFERENCES

Bloom, M. “Challenges to Helping Profession and the responses of Scientific
Practice”, Social Service Review, 52, 584-595., 1978.
Dasgupta, Sugata. “Social Work Research “ in Encyclopaedia of Social Work,
India New Delhi :Govt . of India, 1977.
Epstein, I & Tripodi, T. Research Techniques for Program Planning, Monitoring
and Evaluation, New York: Columbia University Program, 1973.
Fansel, David, “Services to and by the real people”. Social Work, 34, 195-196,
1980.
House, E.R. Evaluating with Validity, Beverly Hills, California. Sage, 1980.
Herlekar, A. Research in Social Work, The IJSW Bombay, July 1964.
Jacob, K.K. Methods and Fields of Social Work in India, Bombay: Asia Publishing,
1965.
Khinduka, S.K. Social Work in India, Allahabad: Kitab Mahal, 1965.
Lal Das, D. K. Practice of Social Research : Social Work Perspectives : Jaipur
: Rawat Publications, 2000
Lal Das, D. K. Designs of Social Research : Jaipur : Rawat Publications, 2005
Levin . M.H. Cost Effectiveness: A Primer New Delhi : Sage, 1985.
Lynn. Lvons. V. and Morris (ed.) Programme Evaluation, London : Sage, 1978.
Micheal . J. and Associates, Evaluating Your Agency’s Programme, London:
Sage, 1982.
Mishan. E. J. Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Informal Introduction, London : George
Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1971.
Monette, Duane R. et. al. Applied Social Research: Tool For the Human Services,
Chicago: Holt, 1986.
Posova, E.J. & Carey R.G., Programme Evaluation Methods and Case Studies
NJ: Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall, 1985.
Polansky, N.A. (ed.) Social Work Research, Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press, 1975.
19
Basics of Research Reid, W. “The Social Agency as a Research Machine”, Journal of Service Research,
in Social Work
2, 11-23., 1978.
Rubin, Allen & Babbie E. Research Methodology for Social Work, Belmont,
California, Wadsworth, 1989.
Rossi. H.P. and Williams. W. (ed.) Evaluating Social Programs. Theory. Practice
and Politics, New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Ramachandran. P. “Social Work Research and Statistics” in History & Philosophy
of Social Work in India, Bombay : Allied Publishers, 1968.
Ramchandran, P. “Research in Social Work “ in A.B. Bose (ed.) Encyclopaedia of
Social Work in India, New Delhi: Government of India , p. 386, 1987.
Reid , William J. “Research in Social Work “ in Encyclopaedia of Social Work,
Silver Spring, Maryland , 1987.
Rossi, P. & H. Freeman, Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Beverly Hills, Sage,
1982.
Schneirer, M.A. Programme Evaluation The Organizational Context, Beverly
Hills, California, Sage, 1979.
Thomas, E.J. “The BBESDAS Model for Effective Practice”, Social Work Research
and Abstract, 13, 12-16, 1977.
Thomas , P.T. “Social Research “ in M.S. Gore (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Social
Work in India, New Delhi : Government of India , p.204, 1968.
Van Maanen. John, Varieties of Qualitative Research, New Delhi : Sage, 1982.
Wienback, R.W. and Rubin, A. (Ed) Teaching Social Work Research: Alternative
Programs and Strategies, New York: Council on Social Work Education, 1980.
Weiss, Carol. Evaluation Research Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice Hall, 1972.
Werner, W.B. Objectives of Social Curriculum of the Future, New York: Council
of Social Work Education, 1959.
Rubin, A. and Babbie, E (2010). Essential Research Methods for Social Work.
Boorks/Cole.Cengage Learning USA.

20
UNIT 2 RESEARCH REVIEW IN SOCIAL
WORK
Structure
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Research Review in Social Work: International Perspectives
2.3 Research Review in Social Work: National Perspectives
2.4 Let Us Sum Up
2.5 Check Your Progress: The Key
2.6 Further Readings and References

2.0 OBJECTIVES
On the completion of this Unit, you should be able to:
 analyse the trends of research in social work in a few selected areas;
 state the different research methodologies used in social work;
 list the findings of studies conducted in India and abroad; and
 work out further research priorities in social work.

2.1 INTRODUCTION
Social work is a practice profession. As such, the major objective of social work
research is to search for answers to questions raised regarding interventions or
treatment effectiveness in social work practice. In other words social work research
attempts to provide knowledge about what interventions or treatments really help or
hinder the attainment of social work goals. In addition, it also helps in searching for
answers to problems or difficulties faced by social work practitioners in the practice
of their profession. Ultimately it helps building knowledge base for social work
theory and practice.
Social work encompasses a broad spectrum of subjects related with both theory
and practice. Most probably, this is the reason research studies available on these
areas have yet to be compiled in an exhaustive manner. We can, however, group the
areas of research in social work as follows.
1) Studies to establish identify and measure the need for service.
2) To measure the services offered as they relate to needs
3) To test, gauge and evaluate results of social work intervention.
4) To list the efficacy of specific techniques of offering services.
In this Chapter, an attempt has been made to introduce you to different areas of
research on social work. Under each area, a synoptic view of research studies has
been projected covering objectives, methodology and findings of the studies. 21
Basics of Research
in Social Work 2.2 RESEARCH REVIEW IN SOCIAL WORK:
INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES
Research articles pertaining to social work published in various international journals
of interest to professional social workers can be broadly classified into four categories:
(a) evaluation research; (b) refinement in measuring techniques; (c) practitioner-
researcher integration; (d) use of research techniques by practitioners in monitoring
their intervention activities (Abstract, NASW).
A review of the state of art of research in social work in the western world reveals
that there is no single ‘composite’ western picture or profile. Hence, first we scan
the scene in the English speaking world based on the availability of literature from
these countries.
Till 1960, in the western world, social work research was in an underdeveloped
state even in the US, where the profession of social work has a much longer
tradition than elsewhere.
Most of the researches in social work employed survey research designs and were
concerned with description of different social problems using basic statistical methods.
Only a few of these researches used experimental research designs and were
concerned about research methodologies, causal and diagnostic analyses through
correlations and path analyses. Obviously, these researches followed hypothetico-
deductive model of social science research.
But one is pleasantly surprised at the change that has taken place in this situation
during the later part of last century or so, because of the changes in emphasis on
researches in social work practice areas.
For example, shift of emphasis from just description of social problems to problems
of psychic imbalances and familial disturbances is noteworthy. Correspondingly,
research concerning social work intervention through case-work method assumed
greater importance in affluent countries. Almost simultaneously, research in social
work intervention through group work, community organisation and administration of
welfare services, received recognition in the field of social work research.
A cursory glance at researches undertaken during the 90’s of the last century in this
part of the globe shows that a substantive part of social work research is concerned
with the micro-level practice, such as working with individuals, groups, or a community.
As a sequel to this shift in the nature of research and problems attended to, increasing
emphasis was placed on a variety of evaluation studies and involvement of (non-
social worker) practitioners in multidisciplinary researches (Abstract, NASW).
Demand for higher standards of social work services and accountability of professional
social workers paved the way for use of computer technology in social work research.
Computer assistance was in demand to reduce non- or para –social work activities
in order to minimize undue-utilization or wastage of social work skills (Abstract,
NASW).
In fact, the most encouraging trend was the use of computer softwares related with
research techniques by practitioners. It was realized that so long as social work
practitioners do not make use of computers as a part of their functions neither
22 practice nor research can develop substantially. Essentially then, practitioners had to
evaluate their interventions with clients by using systematic research techniques with Research Review
in Social Work
the help of computers.
Thus social work research practitioners were helped to, empirically, describe what
they are doing with their clients and why they are following a particular course of
treatment as well as monitor the effect of their interventions. Correspondingly, there
was a sharp decline in survey research pertaining to description of different social
problems, causal and diagnostic analyses in the areas of social work.
This shift in research emphasis might have occurred because traditional researchable
issues had by then been exhaustively studied and/or had established comprehensive
patterns or trends. Another probable reason for the movement away from traditional
researches could be consistent demand for higher standards of social services.
It might be also due to the increasing demands of accountability of professional
social workers. As Brenner (1976) says, “The current crisis in accountability has
illuminated the failure of traditional researches to provide sufficiently relevant, effective
and efficient modes of inquiry into social services.” Many researchers (Rubin and
Babbie, 2010) have laid emphasis upon evidence based practice. According to them
evidence based practice decisions in light of the best research evidence available. It
encourages practitioners to integrate scientific evidence with their practice expertise
and knowledge of the idio-syncratic circumstances bearing on specific practice
decisions.
Currently, in western world, Social Work research methodology links social work
knowledge and practice. The Task Force on Social Work Research sponsored by
the National Institute of Mental Health, completed a three-year study in which it
examined the current status of research in social work, one of the key professions
that employs social and psychological interventions for the purpose of helping
people solve problems of growth and adaptation (Austin et. al.1991).
Among the chief observations made by the task force are : more researchers are
required to do research that informs social work practice; and there are deficits in
the structural arrangements of research, i.e., a paucity of structures to facilitate
collaborative efforts between universities and social agencies. It is further noted that
the Council on Social Work Education has reaffirmed its position that schools of
social work, to be accredited, must provide instruction that teaches students how to
evaluate the effectiveness of their practice.
With respect to these considerations and in reference to the state of the art of
research in the social work professions, the three emerging issues are :
conceptualization of intervention research, so that it allows social work theoreticians
and researchers to distinguish intervention research, from other modalities; a new
model of research on the design and development of intervention; and guidelines for
conducting intervention research in direct practice with individuals, groups and
families, as well as in community organizations.
Intervention research, which is focused on the development of knowledge about
interventions, as being comprised of Intervention Knowledge Development,
Intervention Knowledge Utilization, and Intervention Design and Development.
Intervention Knowledge Development employs conventional social research strategies
to produce knowledge from the social and behavioral science that can be applied
to social work practice; and Intervention Knowledge Utilization employs a variety
of procedures, such as meta-analysis, marketing strategies, and demonstrations, to 23
Basics of Research package and disseminate knowledge about innovative interventions. Intervention
in Social Work
Design and Development is the heart of intervention research because it focuses on
the development of new interventions as well as on the requirements for adapting
previously used interventions to changing conditions such as population demographics,
new social problems, reduced resources, etc. it is the methodology and practice of
Intervention Design and Development that provides the uniqueness of intervention
research. Paradoxically, the design and development of interventions that are effective
has long been a favourite rallying cry for human service practitioners seeking relevant
knowledge yet, it is that research that has been most neglected (Thomas, 1984;
Rothman, 1980).
The model of Intervention Design and Development combines and integrates the
essential features of two pioneering efforts in the field; social R and D and Research
and Development in the Human Service. This integrated model is comprised of six
phases; problem analysis and project planning; information gathering and synthesis;
design early development and pilot testing; evaluation and advanced development;
and dissemination. The research focuses on various aspect of these phases and
provide a clear view of the creativity that is necessary to develop relevant
interventions that achieve practice goals. One may form an impression that design
and development can be time-consuming and complex, and so become disinclined
to engage in this type of research. This would be a serious mistake and would
reinforce the observation of the Task Force on social Work Research that research
directly related to social work practice is often neglected. Authors further suggest
that intervention-oriented researchers must conceive of research on serious social
problems as involving possibly more than research by one individual i.e. research
may be programmatic, involving inter-as well as intra-disciplinary efforts by teams
of researchers. The conception is useful for either individual or team research. In
addition, researchers can carry out research on various aspects of the model as
applied to the development of particular intervention (Rothman, 1980; Thomas,
1984).
There is no particular trend in research technique that is employed in Intervention
Design and Development. Both quantitative and qualitative research modalities are
used in relation to a particular type of intervention that is being produced. The
research experiences that are described help the reader to develop a conceptual and
methodological stance for conducting various aspects of intervention research. In
addition, they provide a useful frame of reference for theoretician’s instructors,
supervisors and practitioners. It helps in comprehending the very meaning of
interventions and in their development, prior to testing for their effectiveness.
Steven (1994) emphasizes that meta-analyses should be conducted by those who
are familiar with the literature that is being synthesized. One should not simply
combine and summarize effect sizes without understanding the details of the studies
that are summarized. James K. Whittaker and Elizabeth M. Tracy (1994) show how
research can be focused on the design of practice guidelines for the use of network
interventions with high risk youth and families. They illustrate the importance of
designing interventions that are compatible with the philosophy, values, and goals of
community agencies and social programs; and they demonstrate the value of their
research, nothing that it is time consuming (Forness, 1994).
Reid (1994) develops a strategy for the research development of a single intervention,
the family problem-solving sequence. His strategy involves the initial development,
24 modification of intervention through single case studies; the aggregation and further
analysis of those studies; and the construction of a more rigorous design. This Research Review
in Social Work
strategy promises to be especially useful in clinical research efforts.
William J. Intervention Research needs to be conducted in practice settings. A
researcher may be engaged in a design and development project in which he or she
creates the practice environment in a laboratory-type situation; for example research
sponsored by a federal agency, such as that described by Edwin J. Thomas (1994)
in evaluating and further developing a unilateral family therapy approach with spouses
of alcoholics. Or, the research may be conducted by outside researchers who use
the social agency as a laboratory, as in the illustration of the research by James K.
Whittaker (1994) and Elizabeth M. Tracy (1994). Or, further still, the research may
be reflective of collaborative efforts by university researchers and agency personnel.
Currently, there is increased federal funding available for collaboration in the areas
of mental health and child welfare. Of particular importance is the discussion by
Yeheskel Hasenfeld and Walter M.. Furman (1994) who analyze three collaborative
researches and development projects from the perspective of inter-organizational
exchange, and offer guidelines for facilitating inter organizational collaboration.
Employing concepts such as power balance, structural centrality, stability, linkages,
and motivational compatibility, the authors provide many useful insights and ideas.
Ronald H. Rooney (1994) discusses strategies for enhancing professional education.
He believes the model of intervention research could be disaggregated so that
relevant research could be performed within various phases of the model; and
among his suggestions, he advocates more instruction about intervention research in
graduate courses and more use of the practice of intervention research in doctoral
education. This is very timely because the introduction of intervention research
methodologies and issues in doctoral education most clearly should be given the
highest priority.
In summation, current researches provide a wealth of ideas about Intervention Design
and Development. They offer conceptual schemes, results from recent design and
development studies, guidelines, strategies, and methodologies. There is important
material in each research , which should be read by students, scholars, practice
theoreticians, and researchers in the social work professions and related disciplines.
The contents are provocative and should lead to discussion and further research that
will inform practitioners about effective practice innovations at the individual and
system levels.
Check Your Progress 1
1) Describe briefly the significant changes in the trend of social work research
after 60’s at the international level.
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................... 25
Basics of Research
in Social Work 2) Describe briefly the reasons for the use of computers in social work research.
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................

2.3 RESEARCH REVIEW IN SOCIAL WORK:

NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES
From all available information it seems that until about fifties, student research was
almost the only research activity in the schools of social work in India. The change
in the number and nature of social work research took place as a result of the
impetus given to social research in general by the Planning Commission, Government
of India. Since research was implied in planning, the Planning Commission set up a
Research Programmes Committee whose function , inter alia, was to farm out
studies in different fields and aspects to different research agencies and institutions
in order to obtain base-line data for planning purposes. The Research Programmes
Committee was followed by the Central Social Welfare Board which sponsored a
few field studies in the area of social welfare undertaken by schools of social work
because they were assumed to be the repositories of social work knowledge and
research expertise and hence the appropriate media through which to bring forth
meaningful action related research findings.
As a sequel to this development, a number of research studies were undertaken by
schools of social work covering a wide range of research areas like :
i) Community Health,
ii) Community Mental Health,
iii) Child Welfare,
iv) Women Welfare,
v) Youth Welfare,
vi) Elderly Care,
vii) Substance Abuse,
viii) Poverty Alleviation,
ix) Mental Retardation,
x) Juvenile Delinquency,
xi) Crime and Corrections,
xii) HIV and AIDS,
xii) Slums & Slum Populations etc.
26
A review of these studies shows that most of the researches employed survey Research Review
in Social Work
research designs and were concerned with description of different social problems
using basic statistical methods. Only a few of these researches used research designs
for causal and diagnostic analyses. Obviously, these researches followed hypothetico-
deductive model of social science research.
An overall review of the state of the art of social work research would reveal that
for quite a few reasons there has been little growth and practically no developments
in the social work research in India. This is evident from observation made by social
work education at different points of time in India – 1961, 1972, and 1977. These
show that there has been serious stagnation or at least very poor growth in social
work research in India. Given the fact that social work education was introduced
in India in 1938, Saiyid Zafar Hasan pointed out in 1961 that ‘very little has been
done which is really worth’. In 1972, Ranade lamented that “social worker is far
from impressive from either the qualitative or the quantitative angle”.
As the Committee on Social Science Research observed, “Much of the research in
social work cannot meet the standards of rigorous social work research and there
is conspicuous absence of competent criticism which would ensure minimum standard
of quality. There has also been an obvious fragmentation of research in this field and
unrelated studies on different problems. Even where a number of studies have been
done on the same problem these are invariably non-comparable because the
methodological tools differ, the basic concepts vary and the very presentation of
findings is divergent. The sporadic nature of research in social work and related
fields in India has, to a large degree , contributed to the poor quality in terms of
initial preparation of design of the study, reliability and accuracy of data, strength of
evidence to justify conclusions and lucidity of presentation” (Planning Commission,
1968).
This may be due to the fact that researchers have been following hypothetico-
deductive model of social research. This dominant paradigm mainly focuses on
quantitative measurement, experimental design, and probability sampling and
multivariate parametric statistical analysis. The research based on this model has
hardly any relevance to social work practice.
Research curriculum in social work education has traditionally been modelled on
social science research. This is most probably the reason why research in social
work in India is in no way different from the social science researches. As such,
social work researchers, largely, view the culmination of research as the drawing of
conclusions from the research findings through the process of deductive reasoning.
These conclusions, obviously, contribute neither to knowledge base of social work
nor to the social work practice. Seldom do they try to test the interventions or
evaluate the outcome of their interventions. The research findings have hardly any
relevance to social work practice. As a consequence, social work researchers and
social work practitioners as well fail to see the link between social work research
and social work practice. Most of them develop a notion that they have nothing to
do with research.
The Emerging Trend
Social work research needs to emerge from a shadowy existence and occupy an
equal place with other methods of social work. Research and practice should be
perceived as allied aspects of social work and bound by the common goal of
27
Basics of Research advancing and consolidating the theory and practice of social work. Common areas
in Social Work
need to be identified to merge research with theory and practice emphasizing on
combining research training with field work (Monette, 1986). It is evident from the
above discussion that social work research needs change in its focus, especially in
the areas of research design, measurement, and sampling so that the research findings
become relevant and useful for social work profession and thereby demonstrate the
accountability of social work interventions.
Stimulating Research in Social Work
Social workers have to realize that it is on them that the primary responsibility of
expanding the horizons of social work devolves. The present dependence on social
science research model must be dispensed with and appropriate social work research
be evolved to enable social work professionals to relate research with social work
practice.
The perspectives and methods of science can provide a framework for social work
research. Most of the knowledge used by social work researchers lacks a strong
empirical basis - an unavoidable limitation of profession that deals with the elusive
complexities of psychological and social phenomena. Social work educators can
make use of scientific orientation in motivating social work doctoral research students
to go for empirical testing of the various knowledge bases of social work - theories,
principles and concepts taught in the theory classes. Research will provide empirically
grounded knowledge, which in turn can make a significant change in the attitude of
the students and educators towards the profession.
In most of the research studies conclusions are based on percentage analysis of
data. Statistical tests are indispensable in research to analyze and interpret the data.
Curricula of all schools of social work have courses on research methodology and
statistics. Many also offer laboratory training on use of the SPSS (Statistical Package
for Social Sciences) and AtlasTi and nVivo. Dissertations are also a part of their field
work which equips them with skills to collect data, interpret their findings and as
required evaluate the itnerventions.
In most of the doctoral research dissertations in social work, research scholars have
used survey research designs. Further, a good number of these researches were
confirmatory researches. It is imperative for social work researchers, to realize that
social work research is a problem solving method and it seeks to accomplish the
same humanistic goals as does social work practice. For this, social work researchers
have to use appropriate research designs to study specific topics from the field work
experiences related to social work. The areas of social work research may be
broadly categorized as follows:
1) Studies to establish, identify and measure the need for service.
2) To measure the effectiveness of services offered as they relate to needs
3) To test, gauge and evaluate results of social work intervention.
4) To list the efficacy of specific techniques of offering services.
5) Studies in methodology of social work.
6) To develop evidence based practice models for social work education.
28
It is very obvious that in social work research the study of a problem is from the Research Review
in Social Work
point of view of social work and more so from the pespective of professional social
work. The designing of research problems, data collection and its interpretation is
attempted in a manner as would be useful to professional social work which would
add new knowledge to the social work theory and practice and improve the efficiency
of professional social workers.
The greatest drawback of social work research has been the lack of fit between
research and practice. Practice of social work often draws from practice wisdom
than from research, while research studies are not necessarily practice-oriented.
Consequently, practice and research are treated independently at the training level
and the approach, therefore, continues in the post-training careers of social workers.
The gulf between researchers and practitioners over the years has widened. There
is an imperative need that social work educators disseminate research findings in a
manner appropriate for use by the various stakeholders.
The practitioners, due to their preoccupation with service delivery systems are least
concerned about research. Both the contentions underscore the need to solidify the
relationship between schools and agencies by integrating research and practice (Ried,
1978).
Thus, as research and practice have co-existed parallel to each other, it is important
that practice-oriented research be facilitated so as to add to the indigenous literature
for social work education and practice.
Role of Research in Social Work
Social work research has a challenging task ahead of it to meet the growing demands
of higher professional standards and accountability. The demands for accountability
on the part of social work profession - empirical evidences showing what kind of
relationship would enhance the achievement of clients’ goal- are becoming louder
and broader in scope (Monette, et. al.1986). In a sense, the profession has to
prepare itself to accept the clients rights to demand that social workers justify their
actions and recommendations on specific and demonstrable grounds.
Another development in social work research has been the demand for higher
professional standards. This motivated many professionals to begin defining social
work as a scientific discipline and social work practice as a ‘scientific practice’ or
‘data-guided practice’ (Thomas, 1971: Bloom, 1978). This calls for improving the
empirical knowledge base for social work education and practice, and delivering
more effective services to the clients (Hopps, 1989). To meet the growing demands
of higher professional standards and accountability, research has to play multifaceted
roles. For this, conscious efforts have to be made to restructure the social work
research curriculum and integrate research into theory and practice.
This is a challenging task for social work researchers. The challenge is also to
recognize the ways in which research, theory and practical components can be
linked by incorporating research into practice settings and by shaping practice settings
into research opportunities (Reid, 1978).
The main impetus to research has came from use of computer software such as
SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences and AtLasTi and NVivo.

29
Basics of Research Programme Evaluation Research
in Social Work
Although non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have increased in number, there
have been very few systematic evaluation researches of their effectiveness (UNDP,
1993). To contribute effectively to sustainable human development, NGOs as well
as donor/funding agencies have to recognize the significance of social work research.
Thus evaluation research can play multifarious roles to make services more effective
(Monette, 1986). In order to enhance programme effectiveness, evaluators have
assessed problems and needs of a programme/target population. They have assessed
the extent and location of the problems, the programme as well as the target
population’s characteristics, problems, expressed needs and desires (Monette, 1986).
This information has been used to guide programme planning and implementation
concerning such issues as the type of services to offer, how to maximize service
utilization by targeted sub-groups, where to locate services, and so on (Jain, 1992).
Role of NGOs in Research
In the recent past, the amount of public and private funds for social welfare
programmes has grown manifolds. As funding has increased, those providing the
funds have sought valid and reliable evidence regarding whether programmes achieve
their goals.
Although, project executors should welcome evaluation of their projects but in
reality, there appears to be some kind of hesitation and resistance against the use
of systematic evaluation. This reaction and resistance on the part of project executors
escalate when external experts or agencies undertake the evaluation on behalf of the
funding agencies.
In some cases, a researcher is considered an outsider to a project and his knowledge
and competence in drawing conclusions on the success or failure of a project is
always questioned and challenged. Nevertheless, adopting scientific methods and
techniques of evaluation research has given a positive image to the evaluator, which
marks him as a “partner in progress”. The researcher/evaluator is now being accepted
as an expert who can provide very useful feedback to the project being evaluated.
Hence, he is not only accepted but is sought after.
The prevailing approach to evaluation has to be replaced by systematic project/
programme evaluation consisting of need assessment, process and outcome
evaluation, interventions effectiveness etc. And finally, projects/programmes have to
be modified through the feedback received by systematic evaluation.
Evaluation researches, despite claims of having led to improvements in the execution
of programmes, have also brought to the light, the fact that there are “very few
successes worth to be put on record, especially in terms of post intervention
sustainability” (Glaser, 1979). The poor virtually in every country on the planet are
reaping fewer rewards of development than those in high income groups. The net
outcome is that poor people, even when helped by successful projects still remain
poor.
Programme Evaluation: The Approach
NGO performance and outcome need to be examined from the perspective of their
effectiveness. So far, systematic evaluation of performance and the net outcome of
30 NGOs have not been given proper attention either by the NGOs themselves or by
the funding organizations (Bloom, 1995). Most of the NGOs do not undertake Research Review
in Social Work
evaluation research to assess their performance or outcome. Instead, they present
individual “success stories” to justify their performance and while assessing the
outcome they present data without giving reference to the baseline.
The donor/funding agencies, on the other hand, largely depend on annual progress
reports, which are again “success stories”. They do send evaluators/experts teams
for assessment of the performance and outcome of the NGOs activities (Freeman,
1985). The assessment of NGOs by the team is by and large based again on annual
reports submitted by the NGOs and on partial evidences collected during their field
visits. Hence, it is difficult to judge how effective NGOs performance and their
outcome are.
Donor/funding agencies and NGOs have to realize that monitoring and evaluation
are integral part of the project/programmes. They have to establish a system of
monitoring and evaluation. Donor/funding agencies that have been able to respond
sensitively and flexibly to the “success stories” may have to think whether funding
of projects, which are not systematically evaluated, is justifiable.
Recent Trends in Social Work Research
Evaluative research is being undertaken under a variety of captions, the simplest and
commonly known is the follow-up studies. Studies on implications or efforts, efficacy
and effectiveness, measurement of effects, durability of effects are also need to be
added to the list.
Different client levels are covered for evaluation. At the individual level, for instance,
Single Subject Design (N=1), subject as his- own control- research are some of the
research studies reported recently.
Lal Das, et. al. studied “Effect of Social Work Intervention on Attempted Suicide
using multiple component single subject design and reported that cognitive therapy
appeared to be most effective in reducing the suicidal ideation and depression in the
client. The article reports the results of a study evaluating the effectiveness of an
intervention package on a male young adult who attempted suicide. Data indicate
that cognitive therapy was found to be the most effective in the intervention package
consisting of crisis intervention, cognitive therapy and developing problem-solving
skills.
Effectiveness of social work intervention in case of psychosomatic pain disorder was
evaluated employing AB Single Subject Design Research. The research study
reports that client showed a considerable improvement. It is clear from the findings
that cognitive behavioural approach coupled with problem-solving skills and applied
in systems perspective is the effective programme to deal with psycho-somatic pain
disorder. The findings also reflects that to get the effective results, we need to focus
our intervention at different levels, where problematic elements were observed e.g.
in the present case inervention was directed at client-level, family-level and also at
peers-level.However, the findings of the study need to be considered in context of
several methodological limitations. The study being a single subject research design
has limited generalizability. But this is true that it will be of great help for practitioners
to apply the same intervention package with other such cases. It will also help
practitioners to maintain data to evaluate practice with each client.
True experimental research design was used for testing causal relationships that 31
Basics of Research Value Clarification causes change in orientation towards vision and values by
in Social Work
comparing a group of students who have been exposed to values clarification process
with one that has not been exposed. The researcher attempted to assess the impact
of value-clarification as a process to enhance the level of orientation towards vision
and values amongst students of management. The findings indicate significant changes
in the experimental group in orientation towards vision and values.
Social work is a practice profession. As such, the major objective of social work
research is to search for answers to questions raised regarding interventions or
treatment effectiveness in social work practice. In other words, social work research
attempts to provide knowledge about what interventions or treatments really help or
hinder the attainment of social work goals. In addition, it also helps in searching for
answers to problems or difficulties faced by social work practitioners in the practice
of their profession. Ultimately it helps building knowledge base for social work
theory and practice.
Social work needs to develop a research paradigm that emphasizes a combination
of qualitative and quantitative measurements, quasi-experimental design, non-
probability sampling and multivariate non-parametric statistical analysis.
Social work research offers an opportunity for social workers to significantly improve
their professional standards and accountability towards their interventions. Research
has a multifaceted role to play in this direction. Steps like redesigning the research
curriculum for social work, integration of research, theory and practice, stimulating
research in social work and emphasis on need-based research methodology have to
be taken to demonstrate the role of research in social work education. Research
what has been discovered is important, but equally important is how it has been
discovered. Hence, professionals need to be trained in research methodolgy. It is,
therefore, important that social work schools lay emphasis on research at all levels
- be it graduate, post graduate, M.Phil or doctoral research. Towards this papers
on research methodology, and production of dissertations as part of field work are
desirable. Most schools of social work have taken steps in this direction.
Check Your Progress 2
1) Describe briefly the significant changes in the trend of social work research
after 90’s at the national level
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................

32 ....................................................................................................................
 Research Review
2.4 LET US SUM UP in Social Work

Till 1960, most of the researches in social work in west employed survey research
designs and were concerned with description of different social problems using basic
statistical methods. Only a few of these researches used experimental research
designs and were concerned about research methodologies, causal and diagnostic
analyses through correlations and path analyses. Obviously, these researches followed
deductive model of social science research.
Significant change took place in this situation during the later part of last century
because of the changes in emphasis on researches in social work practice areas. For
example, shift of emphasis from just description of social problems to problems of
psychic imbalances and familial disturbances is noteworthy.
Researches undertaken during the 90’s of last century in this part of the globe shows
that a substantive part of social work research is concerned with the micro-level
practice, such as working with individuals, groups or members of a community.
Demand for higher standards of social work services and accountability of professional
social workers paved the way for use of computer technology in social work research.
Computer assistance was in demand to reduce non- or para –social work activities
in order to minimize undue utilization or wastage of social work skills.
The most encouraging trend was the use of computer softwares, such as the Statistical
Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) related with research techniques by
practitioners. It was realized that so long as social work practitioners do not make
use of computers as a part of their functions neither practice nor research can
develop substantially. Essentially then, practitioners had to evaluate their interventions
with clients by using systematic research techniques with the help of computers.
This shift in research emphasis might have occurred because traditional researchable
issues had by then been exhaustively studied and/or had established comprehensive
patterns or trends. Another probable reason for the movement away from traditional
researches could be consistent demand for higher standards of social services. It
might be also due to the increasing demands of accountability of professional social
workers.
Currently, in western world social work research methodology links social work
knowledge and practice. In India, an emerging trend of research in diverse practice
areas has been a positive trend. Curricular changes have been made accordingly.
Students at M.A., M.Phil level increasingly take up dissertations under supervised
mode.
As a sequel to this development, a number of research studies have been undertaken
by schools of social work covering a wide range of research areas in social work.
Most of these researches employ survey research designs and are concerned with
description of different social problems using basic statistical methods. Only a few
of these researches use research designs for causal and diagnostic analyses. Obviously,
these researches followed hypothetico-deductive model of social science research.

33
Basics of Research
in Social Work 2.5 CHECK YOUR PROGRESS: THE KEY
Check Your Progress 1
At the International level, significant changes in social work researches were: Changes
in emphasis from just description of social problems to problems of psychic imbalances
and familial disturbances, researches in social work practice areas and use of
computer technology in social work research.
Check Your Progress 2
Demand for higher standards of social work services and accountability of professional
social workers paved the way for use of computer technology in social work research.
Computer assistance was in demand to reduce non-or para-social work activities in
order to minimize undue utilization or wastage of social work skills (Abstract, NASW).
It was realized that so long as social work practitioners do not make use of computers
as a part of their functions neither practice nor research can develop substantially.
Essentially, then, practitioners had to evaluate their interventions with clients by using
systematic research techniques with the help of computers.
Significant changes in the trend of social work research after 90’s at the national
level are: Evaluative researches undertaken under variety of captions; follow-up
studies, studies on implications or efforts, efficacy and effectiveness, measurement of
effects, durability of effects, Single Subject Design (N=l),

2.6 FURTHER READINGS AND REFERENCES

Abstract for Social Workers, National Association of Social Workers, 12, 13 and
14
Austin, David, et. al., Building Social Work Knowledge for Effective Services
and Policies: A Plan for Research Development, Report of the Task Force on
Social Work Research, National Institute of Mental Health, November, 1991.
Bloom, M. “Challenges to Helping Profession and the responses of Scientific
Practice”, Social Service Review, 52, 584-595., 1978.
Brenner,M.N. “The Quest for Viable Research in Social Services: Development of
the Mini Study”, Social Service Review, 50 (3), 1976 pp. 426-44 quoted from
Abstract for Social workers, NASW, V12, No.4, 1976
Burk, H.D. and Peterson, G.W. “ Needed more Evaluation not Research” Personnel
and Guidance Journal55 (8)1975 p563-69
Dasgupta, Sugata. “Social Work Research “ in Encyclopaedia of Social Work,
India, New Delhi :Govt. of India, 1977.
Epstein, I & Tripodi, T. Research Techniques for Program Planning, Monitoring
and Evaluation, New York: Columbia University Program, 1973.
Fansel, David, “Services to and by the real people”. Social Work, 34, 195-196,
1980.
Hasan, Saiyid Zafar “Relation of the Social Sciences and Social Research for Social
Work Training”, paper submitted at a meeting of schools of social work in India, 13
34 May 1961, p7, 8, 10 (mimeo).
House, E.R. Evaluating with Validity, Beverly Hills, California. Sage, 1980. Research Review
in Social Work
Herlekar, A. Research in Social Work, The IJSW Bombay, July 1964.
Jack, Rthman, and Thomas, Edwin J. (eds). Intervention Research : Design and
Development for Human Service, New York : The Haworth Press, 1994.
Jacob, K.K. Methods and Fields of Social Work in India, Bombay: Asia Publishing,
1965.
James K. Whittaker (1994)and Elizabeth M. Tracy (1994) et. al. “Intervention
Design for Practice – Enhancing Social Support” in Rthman, and Thomas, Edwin J.
(eds). Intervention Research : Design and Development for Human Service, New
York : The Haworth Press, 1994.
Khinduka, S.K. Social Work in India, Allahabad: Kitab Mahal, 1965.
Levin . M.H. Cost-effectiveness: A Primer New Delhi : Sage, 1985.
Lynn. Lvons. V. and Morris (ed.) Programme Evaluation, London : Sage, 1978.
Micheal . J. and Associates, Evaluating Your Agency’s Programme, London:
Sage, 1982.
Mishan. E. J. Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Informal Introduction, London : George
Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1971.
Monette, Duane R. et. al. Applied Social Research: Tool For the Human Services,
Chicago: Holt, 1986.
Monette, D.R. (et.al), Applied Social Research: Tool for the Human Services
Chicago: Holt, 1986.
Planning Commission, Government of India, Report of the Committee on Social
Science Research, 1968 p. 23
Posova, E.J. & Carey R.G., Programme Evaluation Methods and Case Studies
NJ: Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall, 1985.
Polansky, N.A. (ed.) Social Work Research, Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press, 1975.
Reid, W. “The Social Agency as a Research Machine”, Journal of Service Research,
2, 11-23., 1978.
Rothman, Jack, Social R and D : Research and Development in the Human
Services ,CA : Sage Publications, 1980.
Rubin, Allen & Babbie E. Research Methodology for Social Work, Belmont,
California, Wadsworth, 1989.
Rossi. H.P. and Williams. W. (ed.) Evaluating Social Programs. Theory. Practice
and Politics, New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Ramachandran. P. “Social Work Research and Statistics” in History & Philosophy
of Social Work in India, Bombay : Allied Publishers, 1968.
Ramchandran, P. “Research in Social Work “ in A.B. Bose (ed.) Encyclopaedia of
Social Work in India, New Delhi : Govt of India , p. 386., 1987. 35
Basics of Research Ramchandran, P., Proceedings of the Seminar on Social Work Research: A Resume”.
in Social Work
Indian Journal of Social Work , 24 (3).
Ranade,S.N. Social Work Research in India, ICSSR, New Delhi, 1972
Reid, William J. “Field Testing and Data Gathering” in Jack, Rthman, and Thomas,
Edwin J. (eds). Intervention Research : Design and Development for Human
Service, New York : The Haworth Press, 1994.
Reid, William J. “Research in Social Work “in Encyclopaedia of Social Work,
Silver Spring, Maryland, 1987.
Thomas, Edwin J. Designing Interventions for the Helping Professions, CA:
Sage Publications 1984.
Rooney, Ronald H. “Disseminating Intervention Research in Academic Setting” in
Jack, Rthman, and Thomas, Edwin J. (eds). Intervention Research : Design and
Development for Human Service, New York : The Haworth Press, 1994.
Rossi, P. & H. Freeman, Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Beverly Hills, Sage,
1982.
Rothman, and Thomas, Edwin J. (eds). Intervention Research : Design and
Development for Human Service, New York : The Haworth Press, 1994.
Rubin, A. and Babbie, E. (2010). Essential Research Methods for Social Work.
Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning USA.
Schneirer, M.A. Programme Evaluation : The Organizational Context Beverly
Hills, California, Sage, 1979.
Steven R.Forness, Meta-Analysis in Intervention Research-Methods and Implications
in Jack, Rthman, and Thomas, Edwin J. (eds). Intervention Research : Design and
Development for Human Service, New York : The Haworth Press, 1994.
Thomas, E.J. “The BBESDAS Model for Effective Practice”, Social Work Research
and Abstract, 13, 12-16, 1977.
Thomas , P.T. “Social Research “ in M.S. Gore (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Social
Work in India, New Delhi : Govt of India , p.204, 1968.
Van Maanen. John Varieties of Qualitative Research, New Delhi : Sage, 1982.
Wienback, R.W. and Rubin, A. (Ed) Teaching Social Work Research: Alternative
Programs and Strategies, New York: Council on Social Work Education, 1980.
Weiss, Carol. Evaluation Research Englewood Cliffs N.J. Prentice Hall, 1972.
Werner, W.B. Objectives of Social Curriculum of the Future, New York : Council
of Social Work Education, 1959.
Yeheskel Hasenfeld and Walter m. Furman, “Intervention Research as an
Interorganisational Exchange” in (1994) Rthman, and Thomas, Edwin J. (eds).
Intervention Research : Design and Development for Human Service, New
York: The Haworth Press, 1994.
3
36
UNIT 3 RESEARCH PROCESS I:
FORMULATION OF RESEARCH
PROBLEM
Structure
3.0 Objectives
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Research Process
3.3 Formulation of Research Problem
3.4 Hypothesis
3.5 Let Us Sum Up
3.6 Check Your Progress: The Key
3.7 Further Readings and References

3.0 OBJECTIVES
In this Unit, we concentrate on the selection, definition, statement, and evaluation of
the research problem. It also deals with the nature, importance and fonnulation of
hypothesis, the features of a usable hypothesis, its various types and utility in the
research process. On completion of this Unit, you should be able to:
 describe the important sources for the selection or identification of research
problems;
 explain what is meant by the ‘definition’ of the problem;
 describe the criteria which are helpful in the evaluation of a research problem;
and
 explain the meaning of hypothesis and its importance, and various types of
hypotheses.

3.1 INTRODUCTION
To claim knowledge as part of a scientific discipline it is essential that it can be
proved by reason and experience (observation). The claim is evaluated on two
criteria, viz., logical validity and empirical verification. These two criteria are
translated into various activities of researchers through the research process. Chapter
3 and Chapter 4 intend to describe the research process in detail.
Formulation of research problem, the first step in the research process, is considered
the most important phase of a research project. This step starts with the selection
of a suitable problem from the field chosen by the researcher. In the area of social
work, several problems exist which may have reference to pure, applied, or action
research. The choice and formulation of a suitable problem is one of the most
difficult tasks for a researcher, especially if he/she is a beginner. There are many
sources which a researcher may consult in order to formulate a suitable research
problem, or from which he/she may develop a sense of problem awareness. This
chapter is devoted to describe the various activities involved in the process of
problem formulation, such as defining the problem, statement of the problem,
operationalisation of the variables, evaluation of the problem, formulation of the
hypothesis, etc. 37
Basics of Research
in Social Work 3.2 THE RESEARCH PROCESS
The research process is the blue print of research project. In a research project,
researcher engages himself/herself in various scientific activities in order to produce
knowledge. Although each research project is unique in some ways, all projects,
regardless of the phenomenon being studied, involve, by and large, some common
activities. All these activities are interdependent. The research process is a system
of these interrelated activities. The various activities are conveniently grouped into
six stages as shown below:
Stage I : Selection and Formulation of a Problem
Stage II : Formulation of Hypothesis
Stage III : Formulation of Research Design
Stage IV : Collection of Data
Stage V : Analysis and Interpretation of Data
Stage VI : Generalizations.
The stages of research are interdependent. The researcher usually enters the research
process at stage I. However, when one enters second stage, one has to draw on
past studies to formulate his/her hypothesis. Similarly, to select a research design the
researcher has to keep in mind the problem and the hypothesis. A researcher, who
has no knowledge of how to collect and analyse data, may find himself / herself
unable to formulate a testable hypothesis, or formulate the research design. This brief
discussion on the research process makes it very clear that each of these six stages
of research process is dependent upon others.
The research process is also cyclic in nature (as shown in Figure). In fact, the
research process is not complete even at the stage VI i.e. “Generalization”. The
process leads to two situations: The first situation may be that the data did not
support or only partially support the hypothesis. In this situation the researcher must
return to the stage I. He/she, then, may decide to reformulate the problem and also
hypothesis and then list it exactly as before. In the second situation, that is, even if
the research is successful and the findings of stage VI confirm the hypothesis of stage
II, it is advisable to repeat the study preferably with a different sample with a view
to reconfirm the findings. This will also support the contention that the hypothesis
cannot be rejected.

Identification of a Problem

Generalisations

Formulation of
Hypothesis

Analysis and
Interpretation of Data Selection of Research
Design
Collection of Data

38 Figure 1: Stages of the Research Process

Another characteristic feature of the research process is ‘self correction’. In a Research Process I:
Formulation of
situation, when the data does support or only partially support the hypothesis and
Research Problem
the researcher has sufficient reasons to believe that the hypothesis is adequate then
he/she may decide that the failure to confirm the hypothesis is due to error in
selecting a sampling design or in the measurement of the key concepts or in analysis
of data. In these situations, the researcher may decide to repeat the study beginning
with the faulty stage after rectifying the faults. Finally, the six stages of the research
process make the study potentially replicable. The researcher designs his/her study
in such a way that either the researcher or others can replicate it. The replication of
study substantiates the fact further that the findings are not due to mere coincidence.
Check Your Progress 1
1) Explain the process of research.
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................

3.3 FORMULATION OF RESEARCH PROBLEM

Formulation of research problem constitutes the first stage in the research process.
Essentially, two issues are involved in formulation of research problem viz.,
understanding the problem thoroughly and rephrasing the same into meaningful terms
from an analytical point of view.
The best way to understand the problem is to discuss it with one’s own colleagues
or with those having some expertise in the subject. In an academic institution, the
researcher can seek the help from a teacher or a guide who is usually an experienced
person. Often the teacher puts forth the problem in general terms and it is up to
the researcher to narrow it down and phrase the problem in operational terms. In
governmental or non-governmental organisations, the problem is usually earmarked
by the administrative heads with whom the researcher can discuss as to how the
problem originally came about and what considerations are involved in its possible
solutions.
The researcher must at the same time examine all available literature to get himself/
herself acquainted with the selected problem. He/she may review the literature
concerning the concepts and theories and also the empirical literature consisting of
studies made earlier which are similar to the one proposed. The basic outcome of
39
Basics of Research this review will be the knowledge as to what research questions have been explored
in Social Work
and what the findings were. This will enable the researcher to specify his/her own
research problem in a meaningful context. After this, the researcher rephrases the
problem into analytical or operational terms i.e., state the problem in as specific
terms as possible. This task of defining a research problem is a step of greatest
importance in the entire research process. The problem to be investigated must be
defined unambiguously, for that will help discriminating relevant data from irrelevant
ones. Care must, however, be taken to verify the authenticity and validity of the facts
concerning the problem. The statement of the problem determines the data which
are to be collected, the characteristics of the data which are relevant, relations
between variables which are to be examined, and the choice of the method and
techniques to be used in these investigations. If there are certain pertinent terms, the
same should be clearly defined and the operational definitions be provided. In fact,
formulation of the problem often follows a sequential pattern where a number of
formulations are set up, each formulation more specific than the preceding one, each
one phrased in more analytical terms, and each more realistic in terms of the available
data and resources.
Definition of the Problem
Once a research problem has been identified, it needs to be defined. The definition
of a problem amounts to specifying it in detail and narrowing it down to workable
size. Each question and subordinate question to be answered is specified at this
stage and the scope and limits of investigation are determined. In this stage of
research the overall plan for the research project must be set out in logical order to
see if it makes sense. The research topic should be defined in such a way that it is
clearly understood. If you are studying, for example, alcoholism you need to put
your research question into a framework which suggests that you are very clear and
specific about the problem of alcohol consumption and abuse. In short, topics of
research must be grounded in some already known factual information which is used
to introduce the topic and from which the research questions will emerge. Usually,
it is necessary to review previous studies in order to determine just what is to be
done. While defining the problem, it is necessary to formulate the point of view on
which the research study is to be based. In case certain assumptions are made, they
must be explicitly stated.
Statement of the Problem
A good statement of a problem must clarify exactly what is to be determined or
solved or what is the research question. It must restrict the scope of the study to
specific and workable research questions. So, you are required to describe the
background of the study, its theoretical basis and underlying assumptions, and specify
the issues in terms of concrete, specific, and workable questions. All questions
raised must be related to the problem. Each major issue or element should be
separated into subsidiary or secondary elements, and these should be arranged in
a logical order under the major divisions.
Operationalisation of Variables
In stating a problem, the researcher should make sure that it is neither stated in terms
so general as to make it vague nor specified so narrowly as to make it insignificant
and trivial. The most important step in this direction is to specify the variables
involved in the problem and define them in operational terms. To illustrate, suppose
40
you state that you want to study the “Effectiveness of Self-help Groups on the Research Process I:
Formulation of
Empowerment of Rural women”. This statement is broad and it communicates in a
Research Problem
general way what you want to do. But it is necessary to specify the problem with
much greater precision. For this the first step is to specify the variables involved in
the problem and define them in operational terms.
The variables involved in the problem are “effectiveness” and “empowerment”. Please
note that these expressions are to be understood beyond their dictionary meanings.
For example, the dictionary meaning of “effectiveness” is “producing the desired
effect”. This meaning is not sufficient for research purposes. It is important for you
to specify exactly what indicators of effectiveness you will use or what you will do
to measure the presence or absence of the phenomenon denoted by the term
“effectiveness”. Similarly, you have to define the other variable “empowerment” also
in terms of the operations or processes that will be used to measure them. In this
study, you might choose to define “effectiveness” as the improvement made by the
rural women in scores on a standardised scale. The term ‘empowerment’ might refer
to the scores on the achievement test in empowerment.
It is worth noting that the problem should be stated in a way that it indicates a
relationship between two or more variables. It should involve neither philosophical
issues, values nor questions of judgement that cannot be answered by scientific
investigations. However, research may bring forth qualitative data that may highligh
the impressions of respondents on personal concerns. These are subjective in nature
and cannot be generalized.
Evaluation of the Problem
You, as a researcher, should evaluate a proposed problem in the light of your
competence and professional experience, possible difficulties in the availability of
data, the financial and field constraints, and limitations of time. After evaluating a
broad research problem you have to narrow it down to a highly specific research
problem. You formulate the problem by stating specific questions for which you
would seek answers through the application of scientific method.
It is worthwhile for you to ask yourself a series of questions before you undertake
the research. The questions should be helpful in the evaluation of the problem on
various criteria. All such questions must be answered affirmatively before the study
is undertaken. What are the questions that we should ask?
i) Is the problem researchable?
There are certain problems that cannot be effectively researched through the process
of research. A researchable problem is always concerned with the relationship existing
between two or more variables that can be defined and measured. The problem
should be capable of being stated in the form of workable research question that can
be answered empirically.
ii) Is the problem new?
There is no use in studying a problem which has already been adequately investigated
by other researchers. To avoid such duplication, it is essential to examine very
carefully the literature available in the field concerned. The problem should be selected
only when you are convinced that it is really a new problem which has never before
been investigated successfully. However, it must be noted that a researcher may
41
Basics of Research repeat a study when he/she wants to verify its conclusions or to extend the validity
in Social Work
of its findings to a situation entirely different from the previous one, or to a new
population.
iii) Is the problem significant?
The problem should be such that it is likely to fill the gaps in the existing knowledge,
to help to solve some of the inconsistencies in the previous research findings, or to
help in the interpretation of the known facts. The results or findings of a study should
either become a basis for a theory, generalisations or principles. Besides, they should
lead to new problem for further research or have some useful practical applications.
iv) Is the problem feasible for the particular researcher?
a) Research competencies
The problem should be in an area in which the researcher is qualified and competent.
He/She must possess the necessary skills and competencies that may be needed to
develop and administer the data-gathering tools and interpret the data available for
analysis. The researcher should also have the necessary knowledge of research
design, qualitative and quantitative techniques of data analysis etc. that may be
required to carry out the research to its completion.
b) Interest and enthusiasm
The researcher should be genuinely interested in and enthusiastic about the problem
he/she wants to undertake for research.
c) Financial considerations and feasibility
The problem should be financially feasible. The researcher should ascertain whether
he/she has the necessary financial and temporal resources to carry out the study. The
cost is an important element in feasibility. It is important to estimate the cost of the
project and assess the availability of funds. This will determine whether the project
can be actually executed.
d) Administrative considerations
In addition to personal limitations, financial and time constraints, the researcher
should also consider the nature of data, equipment, specialised personnel, and
administrative facilities that are needed to complete the study successfully. He/she
should check whether he/she is able to get the co-operation from various
administrative authorities for collecting various types of data.
e) Time
Projects are a time-bound exercise. Most of you, if not all, are already engaged in
more than one activity in office, at home and/or in some social organizations. It is
important to assess the time required to complete a study, besides the assessment
of total period, it is necessary to identify the particular span of the year in relation
to the nature of the study.
Check Your Progress 2
1) In the light of our discussion till now, think and suggest of a research problem
in your own area of specialisation. State the variables of the problem you have
42 identified and state briefly how it is new, significant and feasible for research.
 Research Process I:
.................................................................................................................... Formulation of
Research Problem
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................

3.4 HYPOTHESIS
After the selection and formulation of research problem, the formulation of
hypothesis(es) is the next important step in the research process. A hypothesis is
defined as “A tentative proposition” suggested as a solution to a problem or as an
explanation of some phenomenon (Ary et. al. 1985). This step establishes the problem
and the logic underlying the research study. Questions which the researcher has
designed to answer are usually framed as hypothesis to be tested on the basis of
evidence. The formulation of the hypothesis(es) is typically determined with the help
of the implications of the related literature and the deductive logic of the problem
under investigation.
Importance of Hypothesis
It may be mentioned here that hypotheses are not essential to all researches,
particularly, in the early stages of exploration of a problem. And it should not
be assumed that failure to develop a hypothesis is necessarily a sign of lack of
scientific orientation. However, a hypothesis may be conceived as an assumption
which merits consideration and needs to be tested against the available empirical
evidence. That is why it is suggested that a hypothesis is to be used as a pivot
around which the investigation revolves, limiting thereby the field of investigation
to a definite target and also determining the observations to be made and the
ones to ignore.
A good hypothesis has several basic characteristics. We discuss some of them as
follows:
i) Providing direction: Hypotheses provide direction to research and prevent
review of irrelevant literature and collection of useless or excessive data. They
enable you to classify the information from the standpoint of both ‘relevance’
and ‘organisation’. This is necessary because, a given fact may be relevant with
respect to one hypothesis and irrelevant with respect to another, or it may
belong to one classification with regard to first hypothesis or to an entirely
different classification with regard to the second. Thus, hypotheses ensure the
collection of relevant data necessary to answer questions arising from the
statement of the problem. For example, in a research problem, “Impact of 43
Basics of Research Development and Levels of Living among Scheduled Castes and Tribes”, the
in Social Work
researcher may frame the hypothesis – higher the development, higher will be
the level of living among the Scheduled Castes and Tribes. The researcher will
collect data about the indicators of development and living standards of
Scheduled Castes and Tribes.
ii) Hypothesis should be testable: Hypotheses should be stated in such a way
as to indicate an expected difference or an expected relationship between the
measures used in the research. The researcher should not state any hypothesis
that she/he does not have reason to believe that it can be tested or evaluated
by some objective means. Hypotheses are the propositions about the relationships
between variables. These can be tested empirically.
iii) Hypothesis should be brief and clear: Hypothesis should be stated clearly
and briefly. It makes problem easier for the reader to understand and also for
the researcher to test. The statement should be a concise statement of the
relationship expected.
Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis
There are some important aspects to be looked into to judge the worth of a
hypothesis in research. A good hypothesis must be:
i) consistent with known facts and theories, and might be even expected to
predict or anticipate previously unknown data,
ii) able to explain the data in simpler terms,
iii) stated in the simplest possible terms, depending upon the complexity of the
concepts involved in the research problem, and
iv) stated in a way that it can be tested for its being probably true or false, in order
to arrive at conclusion in the form of an empirical or operational statement.
Formulation and Testing of Hypothesis
Hypotheses are formulated to explain observed facts, conditions, or behaviours and
to serve as a guide in the research process. The statements or tentative generalisations
which constitute hypotheses are partly based on facts and explanations, and are
partly conceptual. Hence, there are certain necessary conditions that are conducive
to the formulation of hypothesis. These are:
i) Deducing a hypothesis inductively: You may deduce a hypothesis inductively
after making observations of behaviour, noticing trends or probable relationships.
For example, as a social worker you observe community leaders’ behaviour in
the village. On the basis of your experience, you may attempt to relate
community leaders behaviour with their personal characteristics such as their
level of education, castes, socio-economic status, and so on. On the basis of
these observations, you may be able to formulate a hypothesis that attempts to
explain these behavioural relationships in a community setting.
ii) Limiting the problem: Here we need to state that the basic understanding of
the literature pertaining to the problem under investigation also becomes essential
in view of the fact that the already existing corpus of knowledge on the particular
problem is too detailed to be incorporated in the process of hypothesis
44 formulation. Hence, the researcher must have the ability to comprehend the
 available evidence in support or against the expected relationships so as to Research Process I:
Formulation of
remain within the limits of the problem while formulating the hypothesis.
Research Problem
iii) Deriving a hypothesis deductively: Hypotheses are also derived deductively
from the theory. Such types of hypothesis, called “deductive hypotheses” are
formulated by studying a particular theory in the area of one’s interest and
deducting hypothesis from this theory through logic. This is possible when a
researcher has a versatile intellect and can make use of it for restructuring his/
her experiences in research. Creative approach to problem solving so badly
needed by a researcher, is the product of sound attitude, and agile intellect. This
view is more relevant to descriptive and historical research in which the
abundance of literature with a number of contradictory/supplementary theories
may divert the researcher from the right path. Therefore, you have to exercise
great restraint and display considerable patience to keep yourself on the right
path. You have to develop certain habits and attitudes, besides saturating yourself
with all the possible information about the problem and also think open-mindedly
about it before proceeding further in the conduct of the study.
iv) Hypothesis from analogies, conversations, etc.: Analogies also lead a
researcher to clues that may prove to be useful in the formulation of hypotheses
and for finding solutions to problems. For example, a new social situation
resembles an old one with respect to a particular set of factors. If the researcher
knows that the factors correlate in a particular fashion in the old situation, he/
she may hypothesize in terms of trends in the relationship to be expected in the
new social situation. However, it is to be mentioned here that use of analogies
must be made cautiously as there are not fool-proof tools for finding solutions
to problems.
Sometimes, especially the inter-disciplinary research conversations and
consultations with experts are also found to be useful in the formulation of
hypotheses. To study the relationship of increasing literacy rate in the rural
population with the changing pattern of social development requires consultation
with experts while formulating hypotheses. However, formulating hypothesis on
the basis of analogies, anecdotes and conversations should be done rarely, only
as exceptions.
Forms of Hypothesis
To arrive at some conclusions pertaining to a particular research problem, a hypothesis
is generally stated in testable form for its proper testing. It may be stated either in
declarative form, the null form or the question form. What do these three forms
mean?
Declarative hypothesis
When a researcher makes a positive statement about the outcome of the study, we
get a declarative hypothesis. For example, the hypothesis “The performance of
the creative persons’ on problem solving tasks is significantly higher than
that of the non-creative ones’ is stated in the declarative form. Here the researcher
makes an attempt to predict the future outcome. This prediction is based on the
theoretical formulation of what should happen in a particular situation if the
explanations of the behaviour (performance on problem solving tasks) which the
researcher has given in his/her theory are correct.
45
Basics of Research Null hypothesis
in Social Work
A null hypothesis is a non-directional hypothesis that proposes difference or
relationship. The usual form of such hypothesis is: “There is no significant
difference between the performance of two groups of social workers, one
having generic background and the second having some specific
specialization.” Since a null hypothesis can be statistically tested, it is also known
as “statistical hypothesis” or “testing hypothesis”. The proponents of null hypothesis
emphasise that the researcher must remain unbiased throughout his/her research
efforts. This view is defended on the basis of the fact that in this case the researcher
neither predicts a result nor indicates a preconceived attitude that may influence his/
her behaviour during the conduct of the study. On the other hand, those who criticize
the use of null hypothesis argue that the researcher should indicate the direction of
the outcomes of the study, wherever possible. It is further argued that predicting the
results of a study is less awkward in phrasing a relationship, than in using the ‘no
difference’ phrase that is usual in the null form.
A null hypothesis challenges the assertion of a declarative hypothesis and also denies
it altogether. It says even where it seems to hold good, it is so due to mere
coincidence. It is for the researcher to reject the null hypothesis by showing that the
outcome mentioned in the declarative hypothesis does occur and the quantum thereof
is so significant that it cannot easily be said to have occurred by chance. The reasons
for rejecting the null hypothesis may differ. Sometimes the null hypothesis is rejected
only when the probability of its having occurred by a mere chance is: 1 out of 100
or .01. In such cases, we consider the probability of its having occurred by chance
to be too little to be considered, and we reject the chance component of the null
hypothesis and take the occurrence to be due to a genuine tendency.
Hypothesis in question form
In the question-form hypothesis, instead of stating what outcome is expected, a
question is asked as to what the outcome will be. For example, if you are interested
to find out whether instructions through video programmes have any positive effect
on the pregnant women, the question form of the hypothesis will be: ‘Will instruction
on health practices through video programmes affect the health of pregnant women?’
This statement shows that instructions through video programmes may or may not
be related to health practices of pregnant women.
It is easier to state a hypothesis in question form because it appears to be quite
useful to write down all the questions that one wants to answer in a particular
research study. On the other hand, a researcher faces difficulties in predicting the
outcome of the study and stating the hypothesis in declarative form. But it is worth
noting that the question form is less powerful than the declarative or null form as a
tool for obtaining valid information, and it is generally advisable to state a hypothesis
in directional i.e., declarative form to arrive at valid conclusions and generalisations.
However, this last statement should not be taken as if it were a law in the practice
and theory of research.
Let us examine and compare the three forms of hypothesis in “Effect of video
programmes on health practices of pregnant women ”.
Declarative Instruction through video programmes will improve the health status
of pregnant women in comparison with those who do not have
46 such provision.
Null There will be no difference in health status of the two groups of Research Process I:
Formulation of
pregnant women, one following instructions through video
Research Problem
programmes and the other having no such facility.
Question Will instructions through video programmes affect the health status
of pregnant women?
Testing of Hypothesis
Testing hypothesis is an important activity in the research process. As a researcher
you should know the important steps in testing a hypothesis. The steps are:
1) State the research hypothesis (H1)
2) Formulate the null hypothesis (H0)
3) Choose a statistical test
4) Specify a significance level
5) Compute the statistical test
6) Reject/accept the H0
7) Draw the inference i.e. accept/reject H1
Step 1: State the Research Hypothesis
H1 There is a significant difference between undergraduate and post-graduate
students with regard to their reading habits.
Step 2: Formulate the Null Hypothesis (H )
0
H0 There is no significant difference between undergraduate and post-graduate
students with regard to their reading habits.
Step 3: Choose a statistical test
Let us suppose that we have decided to use Chi-Square statistic (X2) to test the
relationship between the variables considered in the research hypothesis.
Step 4: Specify a significance level
Further we suppose that we would like to test our hypothesis at .05 level of
significance.
Step 5: Compute the statistical test
In this step the researcher has to cross-tabulate his/her data and compute Chi-
square test (see Block 4, Unit 3) . On computation of the test, let us say that the
test yielded a value of 6.78, df = 1.
Step 6: Reject/accept the H0
Since the calculated value of Chi-square is more than the critical value we reject the
null hypothesis.
Step 7: Draw the inference i.e. accept/reject H1
We accept the research hypothesis because the null hypothesis has been rejected.
Hence, we can infer that there is a significant difference between undergraduate and
post-graduate students with regard to their reading habits. 47
Basics of Research Type I and Type II Errors
in Social Work
Unlike physical sciences, in social sciences we do not find propositions that indicate
certainty. In real world, almost all the propositions, generally, indicate some sort of
probabilities. Thus, instead of stating that if A is true, B must follow, we say only if
A is true, B will probably also be true.
We thus admit the possibility that B may be false even if A is true. Thus, if we reject
A whenever B is false, we also run the risk of making error that of rejecting a true
research hypothesis (H1). We refer to this kind of error as type I Error.
Otherwise, if we fail to reject (accept) A when B is true we again run the risk of
making an error, since A may actually be false. Accepting a false research hypothesis
(H1) is referred to as type II error.
Example
1) Most members will conform to societal norm (A).
2) It is a norm of society not to steal.
3) B is a member of society.
Inferences
i) B will probably not steal. Therefore, if A is true (1) B will probably also be true.
But if B does steal we reject A with some risk of Type I error (since A may
be true, B being one of the few dishonest members).
ii) If we fail to reject A when B is true, we run a risk of making an error since
A may actually be false, i.e. failing to reject a false H1, is referred to as a type
II error or b error.
In social research inferences drawn from the sample are applied to the population
from which the sample is drawn. The following statements help us to understand
Type I and Type II Errors with reference to the sample and population.
Type I error: Populations differ when in fact they are alike.
Type II error: Two populations are alike when in fact they differ.
Type I and Type II Errors are shown diagrammatically as below:
Population Realities
Difference No Difference
Research
Conclusions TYPE I
CORRECT
(Drawn on the basis DECISION ERROR
of sample) 
Reject Ho
(There is no difference)

Accept Ho TYPE II CORRECT

 ERROR DECISION
(There is no difference)

48
While we test hypothesis we do not study the entire population; instead, we study Research Process I:
Formulation of
a part of it. As such, we can never prove if the null hypothesis is true or false. What
Research Problem
we try to prove is whether the sample results are sufficiently likely or unlikely to
justify the decision to accept or to reject the null hypothesis.
The null hypothesis can be either true or false. A researcher has a choice of either
rejecting or accepting the hypothesis. Hence, there are four possibilities as presented
below:
Case 1. The null hypothesis is true and it is rejected
Case 2. The null hypothesis is true and it is accepted
Case 3. The null hypothesis is false and is rejected
Case 4. The null hypothesis is false and is accepted
In first case, a null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. This decision is an error.
This error – the rejection of true hypothesis is termed as a type I error. In the second
case there is no error because the researcher accepts a hypothesis which is true. The
same is with the third case, there is no error in decision because a hypothesis is false
and it is rejected. But the decision in the fourth case is an error. That is, a false
hypothesis is accepted. Accepting false hypothesis is known as a type II error.
Check Your Progress 1
1) Explain with your own examples the three forms of hypothesis.
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
Hypothesis in Various Types of Research
There is no rigid rule about the choice of the form of hypothesis. You can choose
any form which your research problems warrant. However, there are various
conventions followed in selecting the form of hypothesis in relation to various types
of research such as experimental and descriptive research etc. In this section we
shall discuss how hypotheses are usually formulated in experimental research and
descriptive research.
Hypothesis in Experimental Research
In experimental research a hypothesis states that the antecedent condition or 49
Basics of Research phenomenon (independent variable) is related in cause and effect relationship to the
in Social Work
occurrence of another condition, phenomenon, event or effect (dependent variable)
in a particular setting. To test a hypothesis, the researcher attempts to control all the
conditions except the independent variable which he/she manipulates. Then he/she
observes the effect on the dependent variable presumably because of the exposure
to the independent variable.
In view of the intricacy of causal effect of the independent variable, it is advisable
for the researcher to give sufficient attention to the formulation of hypothesis alongwith
the experimental plans and statistical procedures. The experimental plans and statistical
procedures merely help the researcher in testing the hypothesis and contribute little
to the development of theories for the advancement of knowledge.
It may be mentioned here that the hypotheses derived or developed from existing
theories contribute to the development of new theories and knowledge only through
the method of experimentation.
Hypothesis in Descriptive Research
Different types of hypotheses have been in use in descriptive research. For example,
to study the effectiveness of self-help groups it may be hypothesized that ‘The sex
discrimination among women at work has decreased over the period 1990-2000
with the increase in number of self-help groups’. Also public opinion surveys require
hypotheses to study the opinion of people with regard to various women’s issues.
For example, to study the popularity of a scheme of income generation, it may be
hypothesised that ‘The scheme of income generation is preferred more by the urban
women than the rural women’. Some studies require not only testing but also tracing
relationship between serious facts to have a deeper insight into the phenomenon. For
example, a researcher wants to study the relationship of socio-economic status and
achievement-motivation with the enrolment of rural women in self-help groups. This
requires the hypothesis: ‘There is a significant relationship between socio-economic
status and participation in self-help groups of women from rural area as compared
to that of their urban counterparts’.
Similarly some researchers are concerned with developmental studies, especially in
the identification of trends and predicting what is likely to happen in the near future.
To illustrate, the researcher may be interested in the study of opening of non-formal
education centers in a changing social order. He/She may hypothesise, ‘The new
colonies in the industrial townships require more non-formal education centres than
the rural areas’.

3.5 LET US SUM UP

In this Chapter, we have discussed the issues related to the research process;
selection, definition, statement and evaluation of research problems along with
hypothesis-formulation in various types of research.
A hypothesis can be derived either inductively or deductively or through analogies,
consultations, etc. A good hypothesis must be simple and clear; it must state the
expected relationship between variables and thus make a prediction.
A hypothesis can be stated in a declarative form, null form or question form.
Hypotheses are formulated and stated differently depending upon the requirements
50 of various types of research such as experimental research and descriptive research.
 Research Process I:
3.6 CHECK YOUR PROGRESS: THE KEY Formulation of
Research Problem
Check Your Progress 1
In a research project, the researcher engages himself/herself in various scientific
activities. Although each research project is unique in some ways, all projects,
regardless of the phenomenon being studied, involve in some common activities. The
research process is the system of these interrelated common activities.
Check Your Progress 2
In the area of social work, the researchers’ own professional experience may be a
better source of identifying a research problem because it would provide him/ her
with the necessary information regarding the relevance and the feasibility of the
research contemplated.
We may illustrate this with a model-project, “The effectiveness of audio-video
programmes on women’s empowerment” could be a research problem. It is, _
significant because, the idea of multimedia approach to women’s empowerment has
to be tested empirically in a given situation. The impact of audio-visual programmes
on women will decide whether to continue with multimedia approach or not. It is
also feasible since it could be taken up by researchers in social work.
Check Your Progress 3
Declarative Hypothesis: “An urban woman is more empowered than her rural
counterpart.”
Null Hypothesis: “There is no difference between the level of empowerment of
urban women and rural women.”
Hypothesis in Question Form: “Is there any significant difference between the
levels of empowerment of urban women and rural women?”

3.7 FURTHER READINGS AND REFERENCES

Bloom, M. “Challenges to Helping Profession and the responses of Scientific
Practice”, Social Service Review, 52, 584-595., 1978.
Dasgupta, Sugata. “Social Work Research “ in Encyclopaedia of Social Work,
India New Delhi :Govt . of India, 1977.
Epstein, I & Tripodi, T. Research Techniques for Program Planning, Monitoring
and Evaluation, New York: Columbia University Program, 1973.
Fansel, David, “Services to and by the real people”. Social Work, 34, 195-196,
1980.
House, E.R. Evaluating with Validity, Beverly Hills, California. Sage, 1980.
Herlekar, A. Research in Social Work, The IJSW Bombay, July 1964.
Jacob, K.K. Methods and Fields of Social Work in India, Bombay: Asia Publishing,
1965.
Khinduka, S.K. Social Work in India, Allahabad: Kitab Mahal, 1965.
51
Basics of Research Lal Das, D. K. Practice of Social Research : Social Work Perspectives : Jaipur
in Social Work
: Rawat Publications, 2000
Lal Das, D. K. Designs of Social Research : Jaipur : Rawat Publications, 2005
Levin . M.H. Cost-effectiveness: A Primer New Delhi : Sage, 1985.
Lynn. Lvons. V. and Morris (ed.) Programme Evaluation, London : Sage, 1978.
Micheal . J. and Associates Evaluating Your Agency’s Programme, London: Sage,
1982.
Mishan. E. J. Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Informal Introduction, London : George
Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1971.
Monette, Duane R. et. al. Applied Social Research: Tool For the Human Services,
Chicago: Holt, 1986.
Posova, E.J. & Carey R.G., Programme Evaluation Methods and Case Studies
NJ: Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall, 1985.
Polansky, N.A. (ed.) Social Work Research, Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press, 1975.
Reid, W. “The Social Agency as a Research Machine”, Journal of Service Research,
2, 11-23., 1978.
Rubin, Allen & Babbie E. Research Methodology for Social Work, Belmont,
California, Wadsworth, 1989.
Rossi. H.P. and Williams. W. (ed.) Evaluating Social Programs. Theory. Practice
and Politics, New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Ramachandran. P. “Social Work Research and Statistics” in History & Philosophy
of Social Work in India, Bombay : Allied Publishers, 1968.
Ramchandran, P. “Research in Social Work “ in A.B. Bose (ed.) Encyclopaedia of
Social Work in India, New Delhi: Government of India , p. 386, 1987.
Reid , William J. “Research in Social Work “ in Encyclopaedia of Social Work,
Silver Spring, Maryland , 1987.
Rossi, P. & H. Freeman, Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Beverly Hills, Sage,
1982.
Schneirer, M.A. Programme Evaluation The Organizational Context Beverly
Hills,California, Sage, 1979.
Thomas, E.J. “The BBESDAS Model for Effective Practice”, Social Work Research
and Abstract, 13, 12-16, 1977.
Thomas , P.T. “Social Research “ in M.S. Gore (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Social
Work in India, New Delhi : Government of India, p. 204, 1968.
Van Maanen. John, Varieties of Qualitative Research, New Delhi : Sage, 1982.
Wienback, R.W. and Rubin, A. (Ed) Teaching Social Work Research: Alternative
Programs and Strategies, New York: Council on Social Work Education, 1980.
Weiss, Carol. Evaluation Research Englewood Cliffs’ N.J. Prentice Hall, 1972.
Werner, W.B. Objectives of Social Curriculum of the Future, New York: Council
of Social Work Education, 1959.
52
UNIT 4 RESEARCH PROCESS II:
PREPARING A RESEARCH
PROPOSAL
Structure
4.0 Objectives
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Preparing a Research Proposal
4.3 Let Us Sum Up
4.4 Check Your Progress: The Key
4.5 Further Readings and References

4.0 OBJECTIVES
On completion of this Unit, you would be able to :
 describe the importance of writing a research proposal;
 prepare a research proposal;
 prepare a sample design;
 prepare a plan of collection and analysis of data;
 prepare a scheme of research report; and

 prepare budget and time estimate.

4.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous Chapter you have learnt about the process of research. You have
also learnt about formulation of a problem and hypothesis in detail. In this Unit we
will learn about how to prepare a research proposal. The research proposal consists
of every detail of a research project. It helps a researcher in many ways. Firstly, it
gives the researcher a complete picture of the whole research project. Secondly, a
well-prepared research proposal helps to make time and budget estimate. Lastly, a
research proposal enables a researcher to monitor his/her research project.
Sometimes, the purpose of developing a research proposal is also to try to obtain
a grant to cover the expenses of the research project.
The research proposal consists of details about various interrelated research activities,
which overlap continuously rather than following a strictly prescribed sequence. At
times, the first activity determines the nature of the last activity to be undertaken. If
subsequent activities have not been taken into account in the early stages, serious
difficulties may arise which may even prevent the completion of the study. One
should remember that the various activities involved in a research project are not
mutually exclusive, nor are they separate or distinct. They do not necessarily follow
each other in any specific order and the researcher has to be constantly anticipating,
at each step in the research project, the requirements of the subsequent steps. 53
Basics of Research However, the following order concerning various steps provides a useful procedural
in Social Work
guideline regarding the research project:
1) Identification/Formulation of the Research Problem,
2) Review of Literature,
3) Identifications of Objectives of the Study,
4) Formulation of Hypothesis (if any),
5) Operationalisation of Concepts,
6) Preparation of Research Design,
7) Selection of Sample,
8) Selection of Method and Tools of Data Collection,
9) Collection of Data,
10) Processing and Analysis of Data,
11) Analysis and Interpretation of the Data,
12) Presentation of the Research Report,
13) Budget Estimate, and
14) Time Estimate.
Preparing Research Proposal
Identification and Formulation of a Research Problem
A thorough understanding of known facts and ideas in the broad area of research
constitute the first and the most important step in identification and selection of a
problem for your study. A thorough knowledge of the research studies conducted
in the field provides you with details about the problems which have remained
unresolved. A list of suggestions for further research given at the end of research
reports and reviews of research would help you to get an idea about the gaps which
exist in the knowledge pertaining to your field of research. Periodicals and
bibliographies of research are helpful in keeping you informed about the research
going on in the field in which you are interested and show competence. The various
sources through which a researcher can identify a suitable and significant problem
have been already discussed in chapter 3.
At the very out set of the research project, the researcher has to decide the broad
area that he/she would like to inquire into. In Unit 1 you have read some of the
broad areas of social work, such as: (i) Community Health,
(ii) Community Mental Health, (iii) Child Welfare, (iv) Women Welfare, (v) Youth
Welfare, (vi) Aged Welfare, (vii) Substance Abuse, (viii) Mental retardation, etc. In
each broad area innumerable problems exists. As a researcher first you are required
to single out the broad area you wish to study. Once you decide the broad area for
your research study, you need to evaluate the proposed area in the light of your
competence, possible difficulties, in terms of availability of literature, the financial and
field constraints, limitations of time etc. After evaluating the broad area you have to
choose a specific subject for the study. Let us assume that you have chosen the
54
broad area of aged welfare. The broad area of aged welfare consists of a number Research Process II:
Preparing a
of subjects such as, aged care and services, life satisfaction of aged, elderly abuse
Research Proposal
etc. Within each of these broad areas of aged welfare, there is a range of issues that
can be studied, for example, quality of aged care and services, determinants of life
satisfaction, social support and aged care etc. People associated with non-
governmental organisations, who are routinely involved with many of these areas/
issues, can find opportunities for research that are directly related to their professional
activities. To undertake a research study, now you have to think of a specific
subject, say for example, you may wish to study a subject like ‘Determinants of Life
Satisfaction among Elderly’.
Review of Literature
The beginning of this section has suggested that you to get literature relevant to the
topic before you want to study it. Social research topics are usually embedded in
so many different kinds of literature that the researcher must be careful in selecting
the best literature to examine. While many researchers collect every material which
has some linkages with the topic, you need to keep the central theme of your topic
in mind to guide you through your search of the literature in the field. It is also
important to examine different types of literature where relevant inferences are drawn
from scientific data. It would be very useful if research findings from studies using
various methods are critically examined.
While presenting review of literature, a researcher should touch upon the introduction
justifying the research, methodological details and findings and their implications. But
most researchers present only findings. Very few researchers look into findings as
well as research methodology in their reviews. From the perspectives of findings,
major objectives of a review are to: (a) find gaps in research, (b) identify the areas
of overlap, and (c) identify contradictions.
For preparing a research proposal, you should refer to the gaps in research, the
areas of overlap, contradictions and significant findings you have noted through
review of literature. This will help you to raise questions which will guide you to
decide the subsequent steps of the research process such as identification of
objectives, formulation of hypothesis (if any), determination of research design and
sample for your study. You must be able to draw out findings from the studies and
summarize them in such a way that someone unfamiliar with study can easily grasp
their meaning and importance. To help you to do this, you should look at the
background literature and review sections which generally come at the beginning of
published research articles. Most of these reviews are very condensed; they extract
a few salient points from numerous studies, summarizing them in a way that is
relevant to the study in question.
Check Your Progress 1
1) Discuss the importance of review of literature in a research project.
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
55
Basics of Research
in Social Work ....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
Identification of Objectives of the Study
Once the problem, the theoretical background, and the concepts have been explained,
it is time to address the aim and objectives of the study. At this stage you are
required to present the aim and the objectives of the study in brief to justify your
study in terms of both its rationale and the implications that it might raise.
It is important to examine whether the researcher has raised very clearly the questions
to which he/she is looking for a solution. These questions should be explicit – the
researcher should categorically put down the questions on paper. This set of questions
can be converted into objectives. Objectives are the foundations of a research
project. Eventually, the objectives guide the entire process of research. The major
attributes of well-written objectives are:
Clarity of expression and direction
The objectives must have been stated clearly enough to indicate what the researcher
is trying to investigate. It is equally important to avoid overlaps in stating objectives.
Measurability
The objectives must be stated in a manner that they are measurable. In case of
qualitative research it should be possible to at least codify the data and information
so that assessment can be made whether the objectives have been achieved or not.
Comprehensiveness
The objectives provide the guiding framework for a research project. Hence, the
statement of objectives should be comprehensive enough to cover each and every
aspect of the research study. As far as possible nothing should be left outside the
purview of the stated objectives.
Judiciousness
Another important attribute is the judiciousness in and justifiability of choosing and
stating objectives. For example, many young scholars, in their postgraduate
dissertations and doctoral theses mention “recommending future research” as one of
the objectives. In all fairness, this is not feasible. Similarly, in a short time-bound
project, a research objective that actually calls for sustained and long-term study
becomes less feasible.
Here it is important to note that rationale for doing the project will be accomplished
only if the study is done well. Preparing a proposal of your study will show that you
have devised a plan to study your problem that seems feasible, you reinforce that
the aims and objectives of the study will be achieved. The value of the study lies not
only in what it alone will produce, but also in how it may add to or challenge other
56
research in the area.
Formulation of Hypothesis Research Process II:
Preparing a
A common strategy in scientific study is to move from a general theory to a specific Research Proposal
researchable problem. A part of this exercise is to develop hypotheses, which are
testable statements of presumed relationships between two or more phenomena. In
other words, hypothesis is tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test
its logical and/or empirical consequences. Hypothesis states what we expect to find
rather than what has already been found to exist. After extensive survey of literature
and statement of objectives, researcher should state the hypothesis in clear terms.
It may be noted here that we do not need to propose hypothesis in the case of
exploratory or formulative researches.
Operationalization of Concepts
Once you are settled with the hypotheses for your study, you need to operationalise
the concepts so that you can develop your measuring instruments such as
questionnaire.
In a study, a set of concepts is used to explain the phenomenon. These concepts
need clarifications with reference to the particular topic. Through the clarifications
and discussion of the concepts a research model is developed at this stage. Precision
in conceptualization is critical in the social sciences, and it is not easy to achieve.
Concepts like ‘exploitation’, ‘discrimination’, and ‘oppression’ may all seem to be
familiar terms. Yet they may prove extremely vague when one tries to measure them
in relation therefore, the precise meanings you attach to these concepts must be
defined and clarified, and then an appropriate way found to measure them.
In the research proposal, a clear definition of the main concept or concepts is most
essential. It is also essential to discuss the process of measurement of the concepts.
In the research proposal you should also touch upon the potential problems in
measuring the concepts. These include two critical issues: validity, that is, whether
the measurement of a concept in fact produces a result that truly represents what
the concept is supposed to mean, and reliability, that is, whether the measurement
would lead to same results, whenever it is repeated and that one could have some
confidence in the results.
In a survey, the questionnaire is nothing but concepts in operational form. In an
experiment, the operationalisation of the independent variable (concept) is the actual
stimulus. In field studies, this process of operationalization occurs in a very different
manner. It is often carried out after the field notes have been collected. After that
the researcher may find evidence that suggests certain meanings, at which time the
process of conceptualization is carried out. To test whether you are correct, you
may go back to the field to see if another instance of this operationalised concept
occurs. It is always advisable to use more than one indicator for better measurement
of the concept. This will strengthen your study.
Check Your Progress 2
1) Define the term ‘hypothesis’. discuss the importance of hypothesis in making
a research proposal.
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
57
Basics of Research
in Social Work ....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
Research Design
After the research problem and its aims and objectives are stated and hypotheses
are formulated in clear cut terms, the researcher is required to prepare a research
design, i.e., he/she will have to state the conceptual framework within which research
would be conducted. The preparation of such a research design facilitates researcher
to complete his/her research project as proposed. In other words, the function of
research design is to provide for the completion of the research project with minimum
effort, time and money. But how all these can be achieved depends mainly on the
research purpose. Research purpose may be grouped into four categories, viz., (i)
Exploration, (ii) Description, (iii) Diagnosis, and (iv) Experimentation. A flexible
research design, which provides opportunity for considering many different aspects
of a problem, is considered appropriate if the purpose of the research study is that
of exploration. But when the purpose happens to be an accurate description of a
situation or of an association between variables, the suitable design will be one that
minimizes bias and maximizes the reliability of the data collected and analysed.
There are several research designs, out of which the researcher must select one for
his/her own project. The preparation of the research design (you will know about
research designs in detail in Block 2), appropriate for a particular research problem,
depends usually on its objectives and hypotheses, the sample, the type of data to
be collected, time available for research and the finance available for the purpose.
However, it is important that the chosen research design is competent to respond
to the research objectives and questions laid down. For example, if the objective is
to test the impact of a broad treatment to a group of clients, it has to follow an
experimental design. Similarly, if the objective is to assess the status of certain
psychosocial variables in a given sample of population, it would require survey
designs. Within survey designs, if the purpose is simply to describe the status of the
psychological variables and not to compare them with any standard norm or not
even develop a norm, the design can be descriptive.
Hence, while preparing a research proposal it is necessary to check the choice of
appropriate research design against the objectives. Another means of evaluating the
applicability and appropriateness of the research design is to check it against the
hypothesis. If the hypothesis to be tested is formulated in terms of relationships, the
study has to adopt a survey design, by which relationships can be tested. Compared
to it, if the hypothesis is to test the performance of two different groups against a
58 particular type of treatment, the research design has to provide for that opportunity
by adopting an experimental design. Depending on the nature of the groups, the Research Process II:
Preparing a
treatment, the size of the sample and also the nature of that experiment, one would
Research Proposal
adopt a pre-experimental, quasi-experimental or true experimental design.
Thus as a researcher you need to examine the appropriateness of the choice of research
design vis-à-vis the research objectives. The details of the design, e.g. type of
experimental design etc. too have to be evaluated. Equally important is the argument
put forward by the researcher in deciding the research design.
Choice of Variables
Choice of variables is an important step in a research project. There can be at least
three sets of variables, namely, independent, dependent and intervening variables.
There are also other ways of classifying variables like socio-economic, demographic,
psychological, organisational, etc. The later classification is relevant with regard to
basic content of research whereas the former is directly linked to research data.
Here, we shall concentrate on the first set. The important point in selecting the
variables is the formulation of the dependent variables. This is particularly important
in experimental research where the impact of other variables on the dependent
variable is assessed.
In order that the research makes a meaningful contribution, it is important to choose
the independent variables as meticulously as possible. The choice of independent
variables depends upon more than one consideration. Of the various considerations
the important one is the existing knowledge on the basis of previous research which
shows that certain types of variables are indeed related to and predict the variation
of the criterion variable. The second important consideration is the assumption of the
researcher – that there are particular sets of variables that are likely to be related
to the dependent variables.
The third set of variables is the intervening variables. These are often ignored in
research, although these actually intervene and influence the relationship between the
independent and the dependent variables. On the basis of the research literature, the
researcher is expected to identify such variables as are likely to influence the
relationship under test.
Besides the identification and classification of the variables, it is important that variables
are measurable. Further, all variables may not have standard definitions. In such a
case, it is expected that the researcher shall provide operational definitions and also
indications of their measurability.
Hence, an important consideration in proposing a research project is how meticulously
the variables have been identified and classified under the three categories mentioned
above. The second important consideration in this case is whether the researcher has
provided operational definitions of at least such variables as do not have a standard
meaning in the literature. The third important consideration is whether there are clear
indications of the measurability of variables.
Check Your Progress 3
1) Explain the purpose of a research design in research project
....................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................... 59
Basics of Research
in Social Work
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
Selection of Sample
At this stage the researcher is required to decide the sample design of his/her study
i.e. the way of selecting a sample. In other words, a sample design is a plan decided
before any data are actually collected.
The selection of the sample for the study depends on many factors. Some of these
factors affect the selection of the sample to a great extent. We will discuss a few
of them. The homogeneity or heterogeneity of the universe is one such factor which
affects the sample selection procedure to a great extent. For example, if you are
interested in studying medical students, which is a very homogeneous group, even
a very small sample will be representative of the universe whereas if you plan to
study a college having arts, science and commerce faculties you may have to choose
a very large sample and even then you may not have confidence to say that your
sample is representative.
Other important issues with regard to selection of sample that need to be considered
are: sample size, sampling technique and type of the sample. The size of the sample
depends on the nature of objectives of a research project and the research design.
For example, in case of rigorous experimentation, it is difficult to handle large
samples; also, it is not necessary. Similarly, for surveys and such other status studies,
samples have to be large. The main consideration here is that there has to be an
optimum size of sample beyond which it is waste of research resources. What is to
be considered is whether the sample size is large enough for the study and the
sample size has been determined scientifically.
You may be interested in generalising your findings to others beyond those studied.
When probability samples are used, it is possible to determine how representative
your sample is of the population which might be the overall universe of your study.
Sampling plans may be very simple or complex. When the rules of probability are
not followed and you merely select a sample of subjects who seem to fulfill the
needs of your study, you have a non-probability sample. For many studies, such a
sample is sufficient; and for some, it is the best that can be achieved. Whatever the
design of your sample, it needs to be explained in detail in your research proposal.
It should be so precise that someone else could generate a similar sample by
following your procedures. Remember that even if you select a representative sample
you have to be very careful in making generalisations. (For details about the methods
of sampling see chapter 9.
60
Selection of Method and Tools of Data Collection Research Process II:
Preparing a
There are three primary methods of data collection, namely, observation, interview Research Proposal
and questionnaire. Under these three methods are included several research
instruments such as, psychological test, achievement tests, interview schedules, etc.
You will learn about these methods in chapters 10,11,12. In these chapters the
methods are explained in details so that you can use them to design and carry out
a study based on questionnaires or interviews, and in field studies using different
types of observation techniques. It also describes different forms of what might be
called data collection procedures for using secondary data.
It is important to note that the research instruments are for the measurement of
variables. Every variable has certain attributes of its own, amenable to measurement
by different types of scaling, namely, nominal, ordinal, ratio and interval. Similarly,
these are variables which are amenable only to rigorous standardised tests, like
those of intelligence, reasoning ability, etc. There are others which can be measured
through inventories or questionnaires. Then there are variables which necessitate the
use of interviews with probing questions to be able to go into the details of a
process. The common mistake in this area is the use of incompatible instruments vis-
à-vis the variables being measured; for example, researchers may use a questionnaire
to measure attitude. Similarly, in the name of a questionnaire, researchers may
actually frame an opinionnaire. Sometimes researchers use questionnaires for
conducting interviews as if a questionnaire is no different from an interview schedule.
The points to be borne in mind while preparing a research proposal are the following:
1) Whether the researcher has chosen a tool of data collection that can actually
measure the variables.
2) Whether the tool of data collection has been picked up from an existing stock
or has been constructed by the researcher. In case of the former, whether the
researcher has checked its validity, and reliability. In case the researcher has
used the tool of data collection on his/her own, has care been taken to check
the attributes of the tool, a dependable tool of data collection, be it a
questionnaire, inventory or an interview schedule.
3) Whether the researcher has tested the feasibility of the use of the tool of data
collection.
While preparing the research proposal you are also required to describe how you
will collect primary data. In case you are planning to use secondary data you must
mention which sources of available data you will actually use. You may also very
briefly discuss about issues of access to the data. It is important for a researcher to
see that, he/she must be able to get the data he/she proposes. If you anticipate
problems in securing the proposed data, these problems should be discussed and
possible alternate sources of data might be suggested. Most researchers propose to
use one source of data yet you may propose few more sources through which you
may also collect data from other sources to widen their scope.
Collection of Data
There are different methods of data collection. Each method of data collection has
its special concerns which need to be considered fully before doing the study. This
is why pre-testing is so valuable, because it helps you to find and address potential
problems before they enter your study and cause bigger problems. 61
Basics of Research The plans for collecting data should be described carefully. In a field study, it is
in Social Work
always more difficult to be precise, and you may need to make changes once you
enter the field. Nevertheless, it is better to have a clear plan that can be changed
as you move forward. For an experiment data collection procedures can usually be
described very precisely. This is also true of a survey. Surveys using mailed
questionnaire tend to have multiple stages in the data collection procedure to increase
the response rate. If you are using secondary data, you need to describe at this
stage how you will collect the data.
The quality of the outcome of research also depends on the quality of data itself. In
turn, the quality of data is determined by the procedure of data collection. The
indication of the quality of data lies in the dependability of the information collected
from the sample.
Processing of the Data
Once the data are collected, they must be processed. If the responses are in
quantitative terms you have to prepare a code book where you have to give numbers
for the quantitative responses. This is very much essential if you wish to process your
data through computer. If they are field notes, they must be organised and categorised.
In the research proposal, a concise statement may be included to address this
subject. It may describe what type of computer facilities is available, what possible
sources of assistance are available, and what efforts are being made to increase
accuracy in the handling of the data. There are now some technological advances
in data gathering which speed the process from data gathering to data entry. An
example is the SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) now becoming quite
common for social research.
Analysis and Interpretation of Data
You need to plan how you will analyze the data. It is advisable to prepare a plan
of analysis of data spelling out the various applications of statistical tests carefully
while the study is being designed. It is better to have a planned strategy that can be
adapted than to end up with piles of data for which you have no organised plan.
You are also required to explain how you are planning to compare or contrast
different variables, for example, men with women, one rehabilitation program with
another, length of time spent in an organisation by the attitude of employees towards
the new incentive introduced recently?
In addition, you need to consider which statistical tests you plan to apply to evaluate
the association/differences between the variables. For example, if you propose to
measure correlation between the variables to test whether there are significant
correlations between them, you have to select an appropriate test of correlation that
could get the result you need.
Check Your Progress 4
1) Why it is necessary to prepare a plan of analysis of data?
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
62
 Research Process II:
.................................................................................................................... Preparing a
Research Proposal
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
Presentation of the Report
Every research is conducted by presenting its results in the form of a report. The
reporting of results of a research study depends on purpose, with which it was
undertaken. A study might have been conducted for various reasons, such as a
personal research conducted for award of a degree; an institutional project or a
project funded by an outside agency, etc.
At the end of the study, you have to present the results of the study in the form of
a report. Research studies follow scientific process. As such, when it is reported it
follows certain conventions and formats for maintaining parity in reporting and for
easy grasps by readers.
While preparing a research report you have to follow a number of stylistic conventions.
These conventions are commonly known as research formats. These conventions/
research formats allow the researcher to present his/her findings within a framework,
a framework which is both logical and sequential. By following conventions/research
formats the researcher not only systematises and structures his/her research findings
in terms of the research problem and its objectives but also facilitate the reading and
comprehension of the report by others. In a very broad sense, the format of a
research report consists of three parts: the preliminaries, the text and the reference
materials. The length of any of these three parts is conditional on the extent of the
study. Each of these parts may consist of several sub-sections.
Time Estimate
Time estimate is another important step in preparing a research proposal. The various
activities discussed above are completed in a sequence. A researcher is required to
estimate time for each activity so that he/she will be able to know the total time
required in executing the project. Time-estimate not only sets the time-frame for the
execution of the project but it also helps the researcher to prepare budget estimate
for the research project.
The preparation of the time-estimate for a particular research project depends
primarily on the size of the sample for the study and the method and tools of data
collection to be used for the study in time available for research and the finance
available for the purpose.
For preparing a time-estimate for your research proposal, you are advised to discuss
with your research supervisor or research experts. This will help you to decide
optimum time for various research activities to be undertaken in the research study.
A model of time estimate is given below: 63
Basics of Research
in Social Work S. No. Research Activity Time Required
1 Identification of Problem 2 Weeks
2 Review of Literature 1 Month
3 Identification of Objectives 1 Week
4 Formulation of Hypothesis 2 Weeks
5 Selection of Research Design 2 Weeks
6 Selection of Sample 1 Week
7 Selection/Construction of Tools 1 Month
of Data Collection
8 Pre-testing of Tools of 2 Weeks
Data Collection 3 Months
9 Editing of Data 2 Weeks
10 Preparation of Code Book 1 Week
11 Preparation of Master Chart 2 Weeks
12 Processing of Data 1 Week
13 Statistical Analysis of Data 1 Week
14 Writing of Report 2 months
15 Presentation of Report (Typing, 1 Month
Binding etc.)
Total Time (Approx) 12 Months
Budget Estimate
In case you are contemplating to apply for a research grant to cover the expenses
of the research project, you will be required to prepare a budget estimate along with
your research proposal. The preparation of the budget estimate for a particular
research project depends primarily on the area of study and size of the sample for
the study and the method and tools of data collection to be used for the study.
Common heads/items of expenditure for a research project are shown in the following
table.
S.No. Item/Research No. of Duration Cost (Rs)
Activities Personnel
required
1. Research Assistant 1 6 Months 36000.00
@ Rs 6000.00 per
2. Research Investigators@ 2 3 Months 18000.00
Rs 3000.00 per month
3. T.A./D.A for 10000.00
Research Assistant
& Research Investigators
(approximate estimate)
4. Typing & Binding of 5000.00
Report
5. Overhead Expenditure 5000.00
6. Contingencies Expenses 7400.00
(10 % of the expenditure
on items 1 to 5)
64 Total 81400.00
 Research Process II:
4.3 LET US SUM UP Preparing a
Research Proposal
The research process consists of six major stages, namely, selection and formulation
of a problem formulation of hypothesis, selection of research design, data collection,
data analysis and interpretation and generalisation. In each stage there are a number
of research activities which need to be taken up step by step. These activities are
spelled out in a research proposal.
You should keep in mind that various steps involved in a research project are not
mutually exclusive, nor are they separate or distinct. They do not necessarily follow
each other in any specific order and the researcher has to be constantly anticipating
at each step in the research project the requirements of the subsequent steps.
However, the following order concerning various steps provides a useful procedural
guideline regarding the research proposal: Identification/Formulation of the Research
Problem, Review of Literature, Identifications of Objectives of the Study, Formulation
of Hypothesis (if any), Operationalisation of Concepts, Preparation of Research
Design, Selection of Sample, Selection of Method and Tools of Data Collection,
Collection of Data, Processing and Analysis of Data, Analysis and Interpretation of
the Data, Presentation of the Research Report, Budget Estimate, and Time Estimate.

4.4 CHECK YOUR PROGRESS: THE KEY

Check Your Progress 1
Review of literature has a significant role in preparation of a research proposal.
Review of literature refers to gathering the significant findings of studies already
undertaken in the area of the research. It helps the researcher to raise research
questions and guide him/her to decide the subsequent steps of the research process
such as identification of objectives, formulation of hypothesis (if any), determination
of research design and sample for the study.
Check Your Progress 2
Hypothesis is a tentative assumption to be tested during the study. It is made in order
to draw out answers for the research questions and test its logical or empirical
consequences. As such, the manner in which research hypotheses are formulated is
particularly important since they provide the focal point for research. They also
affect the manner in which tests must be conducted, in the analysis of data and
indirectly the quality of data which is required for the analysis.
Check Your Progress 3
The researcher is required to prepare a research design to state the conceptual
framework within which research would be conducted. The preparation of such a
research design facilitates researcher to complete his/her research project as
proposed.
Check Your Progress 4
A plan of analysis of data is prepared to spell out the various ways of analysis of
data and applications of statistical tests while the research proposal is prepared.
Because it is better to have a planned strategy that can be adapted than to end up
with piles of data for which you have no organized plan.
65
Basics of Research
in Social Work 4.5 FURTHER READINGS AND REFERENCES
Anderson, Janathn. et.al. (1976), Thesis and Assignment Writing, Wiley Eastern,
New Delhi.

Ary, D., Lucy, C. Jacobs and Razavich, A. (1972), Introduction to Research in

Education, Third edition, Rinehart and Winston Inc., Holt, New York,

Baker, L. Therese (1988), Doing Social Research, McGraw Hill, New York.

Bailey, Kenneth D. (1978), Methods of Social Research, The Free Press, London.

Black, James A. and Champion, Dean J. (1976), Methods and Issues in Social
Research, John Wiley, New York.

Galtung, John (1970), Theory and Methods of Social Research, George Allen and
Unwin, London.

Goode. W.J. and Hatt. P.K. (1952), Methods of Social Research, McGraw Hill,
New York.

Kerlinger, Fred R. (1964), Foundations of Behavioural Research, Surjeet

Publications, Delhi.

Kothari, L.R. (1985), Research Methodology, Vishwa Prakashan, New Delhi.

Kidder, Louise H. (1981), Research Methods in Social Relations, Holt, New

York.

Lal Das, D, K. (2000), Practice of Social Research: Social Work Perspective,

Rawat Publications, Jaipur.

Lundberg, G. A. (1946), Social Research, Longman, New York.

Monette, Duane R. et. al. (1986), Applied Social Research: Tool For the Human
Services, Holt, Chicago.

Nachmias D and Nachmias C. (1981), Research Methods in the Social Sciences,

St. Martins Press, NewYork.

Wilkinson, T.S. and Bhandarkar, P.L. (1977), Methodology and Techniques of

Social Research, Himalaya Publishing, Bombay.

Broadbeck. May (ed.) (1968), Readings in the Philosophy of Science, The

MacMillan, New York.

Thomas, P.T. (1977), “Social Research” in Encyclopaedia of Social Work India,

Govt. of India, New Delhi.

Van Dalen, D.B., (1973), Understanding Educational Research: An Introduction,

Mc Graw Hill, N.Y.

66