Device Master File
Device Master File
:
Issue No. : 01
(Company Name)
(Company Logo) Revision: 00
Date: 26.06.2020
Device Master File- (Product Name) Page 1 of 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Doc No. :
Issue No. : 01
(Company Name)
(Company Logo) Revision: 00
Date: 26.06.2020
Device Master File- (Product Name) Page 3 of 16
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Doc No. :
Issue No. : 01
(Company Name)
(Company Logo) Revision: 00
Date: 26.06.2020
Device Master File- (Product Name) Page 4 of 16
1.1 Introductory descriptive information on the medical device, the intended use and
indication for use, Class of Device, novel features of the device (if any), Shelf Life of
the Device and a synopsis on the content of the dossier .
1.1.4 Contraindications:
__________________________
1.1.7 In this dossier, we are providing information on regulatory status of device, device
description, product specification, product verification and validation, Biocompatibility
studies, Sterilization, Clinical evidence and post marketing surveillance data Report.
1.3 Risk Management Plan, Risk Analysis, evaluation and control documents.
Please refer to ANNEXURE-1, Risk Management Report.
1.7 Marketing History of the device from the date of introducing the device in the market
1.7.1 _____________
1.7.2 ____________________
Doc No. :
Issue No. : 01
(Company Name)
(Company Logo) Revision: 00
Date: 26.06.2020
Device Master File- (Product Name) Page 6 of 16
1.7.3 ____________________
1.7.4 ____________________
1.7.5 ____________________
1.7.6 ____________________
1.8 Domestic Price of the device in the currency followed in the Country of origin
____________________________
1.9 List of regulatory approvals or marketing clearance obtained (Submit respective copies
of Approval Certificates)
Approved Class of Date of First
Country Approved Indication
shelf life Device Approval
European Union
Turkey
Georgia
Ukraine
b. If the device contains any of the following material then descriptive information on
the following need to be provided:
Animal or human cell tissues and/or derivatives thereof, rendered non-viable
(e.g. Porcine Heart Valve): Not Applicable. Our device don’t have this kind
material.
Irradiating components, ionizing or non-ionizing: No, our product don’t have any
irradiating components, ionizing or non-ionizing.
Doc No. :
Issue No. : 01
(Company Name)
(Company Logo) Revision: 00
Date: 26.06.2020
Device Master File- (Product Name) Page 7 of 16
2.1 The dossier should contain the following descriptive information for the device:
a. A general description of device including its Generic name, Model Name, Model No.,
Materials of Construction, Intended Use or Indications, Instructions for Use,
Contraindications, Warnings, Precautions and Potential Adverse Effects;
DESCRIPTION:
______________________
MODEL NUMBER:
______________________
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION:
Part name Material Specification
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
A. __________________
B. __________________
C. __________________
D. __________________
E. __________________
e. A description of the accessories, other medical device and other product that
are not medical device, which are intended to be used in combination with it. It
should also be clarifies whether these accessories/devices are supplied as a kit
or separate components.
________________________________________________________________
b)
c)
d)
e)
3.
4.
(Product Pictures)
(Product Dimensions)
Device in question
CE-marked equivalent device (Ethicon, Inc)
Item (Your Company) Outcome
(Product Name) (Product Name)
Intended Use/Purpose
Clinical Condition
Used time
Population
Material
Photo (examples)
Manufacturing
Procedures
Biocompatibility
Packaging
Conclusion
3.0 LABELLING
Please refer to ANNEXURE-7, for “Instruction for Use”.
Please refer to ANNEXURE-9, for “Labeling, Artwork and Promotional brochure or
promotional material”.
(ii) Methods used to demonstrate conformity may include one or more of the following:
(a) Conformity with standards as referred to in rule 7;
(b) Conformity with an in-house test method;
(c) The evaluation of pre-clinical and clinical evidence;
(d) Comparison to a similar device already available on the market.
Please refer to ANNEXURE-13, for “Essential Requirements Checklist”.
b) Lab Test;
(Product Name)are designed and tested acc. to the product specification. Performance,
safety and functional testing has been performed. The test was conducted by the
accredited laboratory (Lab Name) with representative samples of (Product Name, Code,
and Batch No.). The test items included appearance, packaging, size, hardness, tensile
strength, matching performance, flexibility, anastomosis and cutting performance,
sterility, etc.
.
d) Any Animal tests for demonstrating feasibility or proof of concept of the finished
device product;
___________
ii) Declaration or certificate of conformity to a published standard that has not been
recognized, supported by a rational or its use, and summary of the data if no
acceptance criteria is specified in the standard.
Not applicable, as the certificate of conformity as per the EU standards (CE Marking) is
provided in above point (A).
Please refer to ANNEXURE-15, for “List of Applicable Standard”.
Doc No. :
Issue No. : 01
(Company Name)
(Company Logo) Revision: 00
Date: 26.06.2020
Device Master File- (Product Name) Page 13 of 16
These tests were performed by the accredited laboratory ________________. Pls refer to
ANNEXURE 13 Biocompatibility Testing report.
Evaluation of biocompatibility is a continuous process. For this purpose, post-production
experience will be gathered and analyzed.
A separate report for biocompatibility evaluation was prepared as ANNEXURE-16
Biocompatibility Evaluation Report.
The Biocompatibility Testing Report are enclosed as ANNEXURE-17 Biocompatibility
Testing Report.
d) Sterilization
Please refer clause section 7.8.
f) Animal studies that provide direct evidence of safety and performance of the
device, especially when no clinical investigation of the device was conducted;
Please refer to ANNEXURE-18, for “Animal Experiments of Feasibility”.
g) Clinical Evidences;
Please refer to ANNEXURE-2, for “Clinical Report”.
Doc No. :
Issue No. : 01
(Company Name)
(Company Logo) Revision: 00
Date: 26.06.2020
Device Master File- (Product Name) Page 14 of 16
D. Detailed information will describe the test design, complete test or study
protocol, methods of data analysis, in addition of that data summaries and
conclusions. Where no new testing has been undertaken, the dossier should
incorporate a rational for that decision, eg. Biocompatibility testing on the
identical materials was conducted when these were incorporated in a previous,
legally marketed version of the device. The rationale may be incorporated into
the Essential Principle checklist.
This is our first generation Device, so not applicable.
7.2 Biocompatibility;
i. List of all materials in direct or indirect contact with the patient or user.
Part name Material Specification
ii. Where biocompatibility testing has been undertaken (as per prescribed standards) to
characterize the physical, chemical, toxicological and biological response of a
material, detailed information should be included on the test conducted, standards
applied, test protocol, the analysis of data and the summary of the results. At a
minimum, test should be conducted on samples from the finished sterilized (when
supplied sterile) device.
Please refer the ANNEXURE-16, for “Biocompatibility Evaluation Report “and
ANNEXURE-17 for “Biocompatibility Testing Report”.
7.5 Sterilization;
i. Where the device is supplied sterile, the dossier should contain the detailed
information of the initial sterilization, validation including sterilizer
qualification, bioburden, testing, pyrogen, testing for sterilant residue (if
applicable) and packaging validation as per prescribed standards. Typically, the
detailed validation information should include the method used, sterility
assurance level attained, standard applied the sterilization protocol developed in
accordance with prescribed standards, and a summary of results.
ii. Evidence of the ongoing revalidation of the process should also be provided.
Typically this should consist of arrangement for, or evidence of, revalidation of
the packaging and sterilization processes.
Package and/or sterile barrier system;
The sterile barrier system consists of 3 packaging steps: primary sterile packaging for
each unit, middle packaging, and the sales packaging for shipping.
The material for primary packaging is sterile blister made of 1073B on one side and
PETG on the other side. Middle packaging is a white paper box and the sales
packaging is corrugated carton.
The sealing process is specified in work instruction. The critical parameters for
sealing process are pressure and temperature.
Packaging/Sealing validation was performed according to EN ISO 11607-1, EN ISO
11607-2 and EN 868-5.
The test items include:
- Sterile barrier system completely formed/assembled;
- Product fits into the sterile barrier system;
- Essential dimensions are met;
- Intact seal for a specified seal width;
- Seal seam: no channels or open seals; no punctures or tears; no material
delamination or separation;
- Strength of the heat seal joint not be less than 1.5 N per 15 mm width;
- Proving microbial barrier properties via bacteria penetration test.
The test was performed for new produced packaging and packaging after aging
process.
Test reports refer to ANNEXURE-21, for “Package Sealing Validation Report”.
The following is a list of changes which could affect the status of a validated process:
- raw material changes that would impact the process parameters;
- a new piece of equipment is installed;
- transfer of processes and/or equipment from one facility or location to another;
- sterilization-process changes;
- Negative trends in quality or process control indicators.
For the above mentioned changes, the need for revalidation will be evaluated and
Doc No. :
Issue No. : 01
(Company Name)
(Company Logo) Revision: 00
Date: 26.06.2020
Device Master File- (Product Name) Page 16 of 16
documented. If the situation does not require that all aspects of the original validation
be repeated, this revalidation does not have to be as extensive as the initial validation.
Periodic revalidation or reviews will be considered since multiple minor changes
could cumulatively affect the validation status of the process.
ii. The dossier should describe the study objectives, methodology, results, analysis
and conclusion and document conformity with Good Laboratory Practices. The
rationale (and limitations) of selecting the particular animal model should be
discussed.
Please refer the ANNEXURE-18, for “Animal Experiment of Feasibility”.
7.8 StabilityData;
Shelf Life of the device is defined for 3 years after sterilization.
Please refer the ANNEXURE-22 for “Product Stability Report”.