Online Shopping Behavior and Impacts On The Physical Store: Eastern New Mexico University United States of America
Online Shopping Behavior and Impacts On The Physical Store: Eastern New Mexico University United States of America
3; May 2016
Haochen Cui
Eastern New Mexico University
United States of America
Abstract
that online shopping negatively affected attitudes toward physical stores. However, the online
shopping behavior is not only threatening for the physical store but also for the encouragement of
the physical store. The study will help the physical store face changing shopping behavior, and
make a good relationship between online store and physical store – not only as competitors but
also as cooperatorsOnline shopping has many advantages and disadvantages. Now, online
shopping has become more and more popular and is changing the shopping behavior of
customers. This study identifies.
Introduction
Due to the fast development of the Internet and the growing popularity of online shopping, some argue that online
shopping will eventually substitute physical stores ultimately. For some products such as books and tickets, that
might be true. However, for products like apparel – a kind of high-risk and hedonistic product – it is certainly not
the case.
The Internet facilitates almost anything desirable for people in modern day society. It has revolutionized the way
people live their everyday lives. The internet has also changed the way products are consumed as well as the
means by which demands for comfort are satisfied. The internet has made it easier for these goods to be acquired.
The upcoming trend on the Internet today is online shopping. Online shopping has played an integral role in many
people’s lives.
Online shopping began to take shape in the initial half of the 1990’s. The World Wide - Web saw the launch of
the first online banking service as well as a Pizza Hut website in 1994. In the late 1990’s and early 2000’s online
shopping became more accessible for a majority of people and its popularity surged among consumers. According
to Internet Retailer U.S., retail e-commerce spending increased to an estimated $66.9 billion in the first half of
2010, a 9.3% increase from $61.2 billion for the same period in the preceding year. Online shopping has become
popular among consumers.
For online shopping, although market share is increasing, sales may actually be lower than in physical stores. Due
to the characteristics of products and customers, famous online stores such as eBay and Amazon just sell basic
consumer goods. The price is low and the main demographic of patrons of online stores is young people from 18
to 25 years old with low incomes. They cannot pay for expensive goods. For example, the average price of a
smartphone online is roughly 300 dollars, with the potential of additional shipping and handling fees. The benefit
of the smartphone from selling online is 50 to 100 dollars. If consumers want to buy a refrigerator or car, they
may go to the physical store. The benefit there is roughly 500 to 1000 dollars. Through this study, online stores
will gain practical ways to capitalize on their advantages to increase their sales and attract more and more
customers to shop online. Physical stores are the most important part in this research. The ultimate purpose of this
article is to give some suggestions to physical stores. In China, a famous entrepreneur named Ma Yun – founder
of Alibaba Group and one of the pioneers of Chinese online stores – also proposed that online stores will replace
physical stores in ten years. Research points to a different conclusion. The main position of physical stores cannot
be changed. Therefore, it would be wise to implement programs that lead to an increase in their sales. Online and
physical stores are two separate entities, each with their own unique sets of characteristics. The relationship
between online stores and physical stores is crucial. They should therefore become complementary rather than
mutually exclusive. This will be conceptualized, demonstrated, and applied throughout this research. Customers
can ultimately determine the most beneficial method of shopping and save money through modification of their
shopping behaviors.
21
© Center for Global Research Development www.cgrd.org
Cutthroat competition may be the potential issue. Not only the online store but also the physical store wants to
increase their sales. Sometimes they sell the same products. Some companies will choose illegal ways to compete.
Through false advertisement, customer judgments can be manipulated. The description does not fit the reality of
the product. Some sellers may cheat customers, perhaps even effect the health of costumers. Those who sell sham
products should be punished harshly. Some companies may have stolen the information from other companies.
For example, the price and strategies of a company are confidential. They are business secrets. Physical stores
may purchase the information from online stores. If the online stores want to decrease the price to attract more
customers, physical stores follow suit, decreasing their prices. It is unequal for the online store. Some companies
will hold price competitions, disturbing market regulation. Some companies will have to decrease the workers’
wages to support the price competition. The solution developed through the research illustrates the purpose:
making good relationships between online stores and physical stores. Both physical and online stores should share
the market. Competition is healthy. It is the vehicle by which both online and physical stores are encouraged to
establish good methods of development. The relationship between online and physical stores is not only
competitive but also cooperative. They should work together, because they have the same goal in mind. For
example, when goods are purchased online, they can be returned at a physical store upon reception. This customer
convenience reflects the necessity of harmony between both types of stores, and their respective profits will
increase as a result. Both businesses and their customers benefit from competition.
Purpose
As online shopping has so many advantages over physical stores, there is an increasing fear that it will ultimately
devastate physical stores. This study will identify why there is less likelihood that online shopping will substitute
physical stores and more potential that it will serve as a complement for them. Therefore, online shopping
behavior is an important part in this study. Finally, the effect of online shopping on physical stores will be
assessed, and methods to make the physical store more appealing will be identified. This study will focus on the
relationship between online shopping and the physical store.
The research is invaluable to both online and physical stores. It may also be of benefit to consumers, as they are
an integral part of the market. Upon investigation into the research deeper insights will be afforded in the realm of
shopping behavior.
Literature Review and Discussion
Deciding whether or not to purchase from the Internet is a major problem that consumers face in the world of
electronic commerce. The decision making process is complex and multi-faceted. Social impact, lifestyle, habits,
attitudes and beliefs, and situational factors all play a role in the ultimate choice of the consumer.
As the internet develops faster and faster, shopping online has taken on a crucial role in understanding
contemporary consumer behavior. There are two manners of online shopping: 1. direct access to an online store;
and 2. access to an online store by other websites, namely a referring website. In the case of referring websites,
third-party websites direct consumers to an online retail store for possible purchase decisions. (HoEun &
JungKun, 2009). Thus, online shopping is a form of electronic commerce which allows consumers to directly buy
goods or services from a seller over the Internet using a web browser.
Customers have many reasons and purposes for shopping online. These include searching for product features,
prices or reviews, selecting products and services through the Internet, placing orders, making payments, or any
other means which is then followed by delivery of the requested products via Internet or other means (Sinha,
2010). Shopping online has become an irreplaceable marketing channel in business transactions. Online stores
and services are important sales channels.
Compared with physical stores, online stores are advantageous in many ways. They are convenient and time
saving. Traveling and waiting in lines become a thing of the past. They are open twenty four hours, seven days of
the week and accessible from any location, no matter where one may be on the grid. Online stores provide
consumers with a wealth of free information about products and services. They also have some online tools to
help consumers compare and make purchasing decisions among various products and services. However, online
stores also have disadvantages compared to physical stores. In online stores customers are denied the sensory
experience they desire. They cannot touch, taste, feel, smell, or hear their products as they search for and purchase
products. In online stores, consumers may develop low trust and perceive highly elevated risk because of the lack
of face-to-face communication.
22
International Journal of Education and Human Developments Vol. 2 No. 3; May 2016
Although this difficulty can be reduced by using certain software tools such as the online recommendation agent
(Huang & Sycara, 2002), it remains an issue to be addressed, especially in certain demographics.
The physical store environment for brands and consumers will be very different in five years. The number of
consumers who know what they want and know how to get it at the least cost to them is rising. They are using
new channels, become wise to price schemes, and demanding that their needs be met through cutthroat
competition. Gone are the days of brand loyalty and Sears-Roebuck catalog look-books. This puts unprecedented
downward pressure on price and upward pressure on value – a pressure that has not been seen for hundreds of
years, a pressure that firms are being forced to recognize and adapt to. Against this backdrop, there is a huge
opportunity for the physical store. Instead of seeing online shopping as a threat to their existence, physical stores
must recognize that they have many new opportunities for development and growth. The potential for physical
stores to be a “vital part of a more efficient, consumer-focused logistics network” is vast. (Aubrey & Judge, 2012
Theoretical Framework
The behavior of consumers differs with the characteristics of their personality. Consumers which have various
traits respond to messages in various ways, in various settings, at various times. The online environment presents
a vast opportunity for companies to interact with consumers on a personal, customized level. Individual
differences are an important aspect of this interaction as they provide insight into how people with varying levels
of experience with the online environment respond to interactive persuasion techniques. Friestad and Wright
(1994) in their Persuasion Knowledge Model (PKM), propose that the effectiveness of advertising persuasion
techniques depends upon the level of persuasion expertise each individual possesses. In an online environment,
measurement of this effect can be achieved by looking at user experience levels, self-efficacy, and number of
hours spent online.
Shopping websites can increase the level of satisfaction that consumers have with their sites through proper
implementation of data from information technology and usage of communication technology systems. In other
words, what was once perceived disutility can be transformed to utility through data collection, flexibility based
on feedback, and most importantly, touch points that facilitate a high level of service and satisfaction for
customers. However, as pointed out by Tojo and Matsubayashi (2011), engaging in such activities in productive
ways may actually produce customers who desire to go to the physical store. This can cause a “free-riding effect”
which can be avoided by including only niche products on the site. This leads to more fair outcomes for both the
online and physical store. It should be noted that the overall profit of the company is increased even in the
presence of the free-riding effect, but moving to eliminate it increases the equilibrium profit of the physical store.
(Tojo & Matsubayashi, 2011)
A hybrid model may be the key to future successful retail businesses. Pure Web-based retail will always offer
consumers a greater selection of products at lower prices than traditional physical stores. Physical store
companies have tried with varying degrees of success to compete with shopping websites. In many ways the
physical is trailing other sectors of the economy in e-commerce. The most common shopping behavior will be in
stores characterized by hybrid organizations that combine the best of e-retail with the best of physical store
retailers. (Levary & Mathieu, 2000). The physical store should learn how to adapt to shopping online behavior.
Methodology
Descriptive research can help us learn about the advantages and disadvantages of online and physical shopping. It
also helps us to analyze the characters of online shopping and physical stores. As long as we understand the
characters of online shopping we can learn about the behavior of customers shopping online and the effects of
online shopping on the physical store.
Quantitative research can gather a large amount of data that can be easily organized and manipulated into reports
for analysis. This method deals in numbers, logic, and the objective. The data collected through the quantitative
method is reliable. It is easy to determine the relationship between one thing and another through quantitative
research. It is beneficial to study the relationship between online shopping and the physical store.
The researcher developed a list of main questions based on review of literature. It will be helpful to define the
characteristics and justifications of online shoppers, and it will be also useful for the research analysis. The
following are the main questions:
23
© Center for Global Research Development www.cgrd.org
26