Lo 3 LST

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

GODE HEALTH SCIENCE COLLEGE

SOMALI REGIONAL STATE


BUREAU OF TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
GODE, SOMALI, ETHIOPIA

NURSING ASSISTANCE L-III


LEARNING GUIDE #3

Unit of Competence: Lead Small Team


Module Title : Leading Small Team

LG Code : HLT NUA3M16 LO3

TTLM Code : HLT NUA3 TTLM 1212v1

LO3: Set performance expectations for team member


Instruction Sheet Learning Guide #3
This learning guide is developed to provide you the necessary information
regarding the following content coverage and topics:
 Performance and expectations this guide will also assist you to attain the
learning outcome stated in the cover page.
Specifically, upon completion of this Learning Guide, you will be able to:
 Maintained or improved individuals and/or team performance given a
variety of possible scenario
 Assessed and monitored team and individual performance against set criteria
 Represented concerns of a team and individual to next level of management
or appropriate specialist and to negotiate on their behalf
 Allocated duties and responsibilities, having regard to individual’s
knowledge, skills and aptitude and the needs of the tasks to be performed
 Set and communicated performance expectations for a range of tasks and
duties within the team and provided feedback to team members

Learning Instructions:
1. Read the specific objectives of this Learning Guide.
2. Follow the instructions described in number 3 to 10.
3. Read the information written in the “Information Sheets 3”. Try to
understand what are being discussed. Ask you teacher for assistance if you
have hard time understanding them.
4. Accomplish the “Self-check 3” in page__.
Information sheet 3 Set performance expectations for team member

Set Performance Expectation for the Team Members


2. Introduction
A lack of clear performance expectations is cited by readers as a key contributing factor to their
happiness or unhappiness at work. In fact, in a poll about what makes a bad boss – bad, the
majority of respondents said that their manager did not provide clear direction. This factor
affected their sense of participation in a venture larger than themselves and their feelings of
engagement, motivation, and teamwork.
Critical Components of Clear Performance Expectations
The process that results in employees who clearly understand and execute their performance
expectations contains these components:
A company strategic planning process that defines overall direction and objectives.
A communication strategy that tells every employee where their job and needed outcomes fit
within the bigger company strategy.
A process for goal setting, evaluation, feedback, and accountability that lets employees know
how they are doing. This process must provide opportunities for continuing employee
professional and personal development.
Overall organizational support for the importance of clear performance expectations
communicated through cultural expectations, executive planning and communication,
managerial responsibility and accountability, rewards and recognition, and company stories
(folklore) about heroic accomplishments that define the workplace.
Communication of Clear Performance Expectations
Communication starts with the strategic planning process of executive leaders. How they
communicate these plans and goals to the organization is critical to create an organization in
which all components are connected and pulling in the same direction. Executive leadership must
clearly communicate its expectations for the team’s performance and expected outcomes to align
each area of the organization with the overall mission and vision.
At the same time, leadership needs to define the organizational culture of teamwork desired
within the company. Whether a department team or a product, process, or project team, team
members have to understand why the team was created and the outcomes the organization
expects from the team.
Communicating Clear Performance Direction through the PDP
The Performance Development Planning (PDP)process translates these higher level goals into
the outcomes necessary for each employee’s job within the company. After the quarterly PDP
meeting, employees should be clear about their expected contribution. Goal setting at these
meetings should include a performance evaluation component so the employee knows how he or
she has been performing.
Leading up to the PDP meeting, the employee self-evaluation guides each employee in thinking
about their performance. The six-eight goals set at the meeting, or continued from the previous
PDP, establish performance expectations without micromanaging the employee. Deciding how to
accomplish the goals empowers, engages, and motivates the employee.
The manager maintains needed contact with the critical steps in the employee’s performance
plan through weekly meetings and coaching. (No, it’s not a free-for-all when each employee’s
work affects other employees and must mesh to accomplish the whole.) Additionally, this step
ensures that employees are accountable for accomplishing their jobs.
Consider following this same process with each team you establish for the same sense of
interconnectedness and understanding of clear performance expectations.
Continuing Support for Clear Performance Expectations
Your organization accomplishes performance expectations in three key ways.
You need to show constancy of purpose in supporting individuals and teams with the
resources of people, time and money that will enable them to accomplish their goals. When you
provide the resources teams need to succeed, you ensure the development of teamwork and the
team's best chance for success. Sometimes, this requires the reshuffling of resources or the
renegotiation of goals. But, the visual application of resources sends a powerful message of
support.
The work of the team needs to receive sufficient emphasis as a priority in terms of the time,
discussion, attention and interest directed its way by executive leaders. Employees are watching
and need to know that the organization really cares.
Finally, the critical component in continuing organizational support for the importance of the
accomplishment of clear performance expectations is your reward and recognition system. Clear
performance expectations accomplished deserve both public recognition and private
compensation. Publically cheering and celebrating team accomplishments enhances the team's
feeling of success. The recognition clearly communicates the behaviors and actions the company
expects from its employees. Use clear expectations to help your employees develop accountable,
productive, meaningful, participatory teamwork.
3.1.Assisting staff to improve their performance
3.2.Factors affecting performance
Performance appraisals are supposed to evaluate the performance of a worker, reward good
performance with promotions and pay raises and set goals to help employees continue to
improve. In reality, however, performance appraisals are affected by a wide range of
psychological factors. Even when supervisors are working with a well-defined guideline to
evaluate workplace performance, they can easily fall off track with results disadvantageous to
both the worker and the company.
Standards of Evaluation
One especially tricky performance appraisal factor is standards of evaluation. Many
companies use subjective terms like "excellent," "good" and "fair" to characterize performance,
but these terms may mean very different things to different people. If a company has two
different evaluators, this can lead to serious bias; a more or less average worker who performs all
of his job duties correctly may receive a "good" rating with one evaluator but only an "average"
or "fair" rating with the other.
General Biases
There are many ways a supervisor can skew everyone's evaluations. Some supervisors exhibit
the central tendency, rating everyone as about average and only deviating in extreme
circumstances. By contrast, an evaluator exhibiting a leniency bias would rate everyone fairly
high, perhaps out of a desire to be nice or a desire to avoid confronting unhappy employees.
An evaluator might also only look at recent performance, exhibiting a recency bias. An
opportunity bias can also skew results, with evaluators blaming or praising employees for things
that were actually out of their control. For example, a salesman could have
declining sales numbers do to a sharp economic downturn, poor product quality or poor
inventory management, none of which would be his fault.
Self Check 3 Written Test

Directions: Answer all the questions listed below. Use the Answer sheet provided
in the next page:
I- Essay: Explain briefly

1. Explain briefly what is strategic planning process? (5pts.)

2. Explain briefly what is Performance Development Planning (PDP)

Note: Satisfactory rating above- 5 points Unsatisfactory below- 5 points


You can ask your teacher for the copy of the correct answers.
Answer Sheet
Name: _______________________Date: ________
I- Essay:
1.
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
2._________________________________________
__________________________________________

Score ___________

Rating ____________

You might also like