Lesson 11 - UTS
Lesson 11 - UTS
Objectives:
At the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
1. Discuss about online identity and their ‘self’ in cyberspace and user id
2. Expound selective self-presentation and impression management
3. Evaluate the impact of online interactions on the self
4. Establish boundaries of the online self: private vs. public, personal vs. social identity
online, gender and sexuality online.
Discussion:
We all have a "true self" that is complex and fragile, but ultimately, is our essence.
In an attempt to share that self with the world, we engage our decoy selves to manage the
day-to-day anxieties and challenges that come before us.
ONLINE BEHAVIOR
◇ People assume that your online actions are representative of the way you are in person.
ONLINE PRESENTATION
◇ The images you choose to put online, the words and styles you choose also say a lot.
ONLINE VOICE
◇ What do you say? Are you controversial, argumentative, or inappropriate?
◇ Do you add value to conversations?
Catharsis – “talking cure”, we might see the self-care of blogging and engaging in social media and
forum conversations as form of self- therapy by talking things thru.
Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) - the feelings of vulnerability that leads the user to compulsively
check the news feeds and continually adding tweets and postings in order to appear active and
interesting.
Disinhibition Effect - is part of the reason for so much sharing and disclosure online. The lack of
face-to-face gaze meeting, together with the feelings of anonymity and invisibility, seems to free us
up to self-disclose but also to sometimes “flame” others
(toxic disinhibition).
SELF-PROMOTION
Actively saying things or taking action to show one’s competence
INGRATIATION
Actively saying things or taking action to win the approval or acceptance of others
EXEMPLIFICATION
Republic of the Philippines
Camarines Norte School of Law
COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION
Talisay, Camarines Norte
Online interaction does not require cognitive or emotional involvement, making our
interaction with it much easier
Interaction with human partners requires more emotional involvement, and thus more
cognitive effort, than Interacting
The extra effort involved in face-to-face interactions can be spared in online interactions that
are founded on minimal or constrained social cues; most of these signals can be summed up
in emoticons or punctuation. Hence, it is easier to hide our emotions behind an email, a
Facebook post or a tweet.
We can control our self-presentations on online interactions and this may be both
beneficial and harmful to the individual
Compared with face-to-face presentations, online interactions enable us to self-censor to a
greater extent and manage our online identities more strategically which provides greater
opportunity to misinterpret ourselves. This is due to asynchronous communication (time-
delayed interaction that does not require participants to be online simultaneously).
Is it true that Facebook provides opportunities for increased identity development?
Research suggests that young users report increased self-esteem and general wellbeing
following instances of positive feedback on social networking sites (Valkerburg, Peter, &
Schouten, 2006)
College students indicated that the heaviest Facebook users were also most satisfied with
their lives and exhibited greater social and political engagement (Valenzuela, Park, &
Kee,2009)
POSITIVE
◇ Social media sites inform and empower individuals to change themselves and their
communities
◇ Increased self-esteem when receiving many likes and shares
◇ Boost ones moral and feelings of self- worth
NEGATIVE
◇ Extensive online engagement is correlated with personality and brain disorders (like poor
social skills, ADHD, narcissistic tendencies, a need for instant gratification, and addictive
behaviors and other emotional distress like depression, anxiety, and loneliness.)
◇ Low self-esteem due to the risk of being exposed to cyber bullying and cyberpornography.
◇ More occupied in giving attention to social media than in keeping their customs and
practices.
and virtual possessions to the original specification of possession and person attachments as the
foundation for self-extension.
Self-Revelation - The sharing of information about self online facilitated by the disinhibition and
confessional effects means that it is now far easier to present ourselves in ways that would have
been awkward at best in predigital times.
Loss of Control - The individual user caters a greater public audience, once a status is updated or a
photo is posted, it becomes readily accessible to the viewing public and the owner of such
information somehow loses control over the information.
Shared Digital Possessions And Aggregate Self - When things are jointly owned, they are also
likely to be more relevant to the aggregate level of self encompassing those with whom they are
shared. In the digital realm, however, we are part of imagined communities whose members may
not be personally known aside from their pseudonyms and online contributions.
FOMO or Fear of Missing Out- Lack of privacy in many aspects of social media can leave the
users feeling vulnerable, leading to compulsively checking news feeds and continually adding tweets
and posting in order to appear active and interesting.
Disinhibition Effect - Part of the reason for so much sharing and self disclosure online (Ridley 2012;
Suler 2004).
Toxic Disinhibition - The lack of face-to-face gaze-meeting, together with feelings of anonymity
and invisibility, free us up to self-disclose but also to sometimes "flame" others.
True self" -aren't fix or that the self is anything other than a work in progress but "self revelation" can
be therapeutic with the aid of self-reflexive application.
"The talking cure"-engaging in social media and forum conversation as a form of self-therapy by
talking things through.
Foucault's View
In Foucault's (1978, 1996) view, confessing our secret truths feels freeing, even as it binds us
in a guilt-motivated self-governance, St. Augustine & Jean-Jacques Rousseau, help to
reinforce this imperative for self-confession in an earlier era, just as others' online diaries and
blogs do today. But the internet has made once private confessions far more public.
"Technologies of the Self" through which we seek to purge and cleanse ourselves.
Exomologesis or "Publishing Oneself" has never been easier to accomplish. Despite the
tension between privacy and potential celebrity, our online confession are also part of the
"self-therapeutic" aspect of sharing.
Gender Inequality
-Heteronormativity is the presumption of heterosexuality unless explicitly stated.
-Valuing some experience as normal or natural, while stigmatizing others as pathological or
deviant.
•Technology has been critized for this male normativity due to disproportionate number of
men and women involve in technical design and engineering.
Normative Gender Behavior - adheres to the dominant understanding of masculine
men and feminine women.
Non-normative behavior - does not follow this norms.
•Sexuality - is an individual expression and understanding of desire.
-While, like gender, this is often viewed as binary (homosexual or heterosexual)
-in reality, sexuality often experienced as fluid.
•"Queer" can be used as an umbrella term for non-normative expressions of sexuality.
-Originally meaning "strange" or "peculiar"
-decidedly not the same as "gay or lesbian"
-rejects the binary approach to make/female or gay/straight identity.
Sandy Stone and other queer theorists were fascinated by the idea of Online Spaces that
create Online Identity wherein users can actively choose which gender or sexuality to "be"
(online games, chat rooms, and any other online sites that required gender)
Donna Haraway's
"A Manifesto for Cyborgs"
-a new way of being and thinking about oneself that incorporated both "nature" &
"technology".
Cyborg Feminism argued that " technoscience" was potentially liberating for women.
-contemporary technology, particularly the internet, could be a space for organizing,
theorizing, sharing experiences and understanding oneself with tremendous potential for
women.
"Masculine" or "Feminine" is reinforced appropriately hewing to a gender norm.
This happen both online, and off. This is due to a variety of factors, including the
mainstreaming a "real" online identity, and the structural nature of sexism.
Grindr - a locative app for gay men.
Social Shopping sites like Polyvore & Pinterest which are targeted at teenage girls and 20
something women.
Social media sites like Twitter & YouTube have purportedly led to the emergence of a "free
culture" where individuals are empowered.
Sexist Troops - the meme "Tits or GTFO (Get the F*** out) originated in a forum called
4chan which is both crude and influential.
•Men and Women tend to blog different topic (Men for technology & politics while women
for food, fashion, and parenting)
-although the technology are the same, the norms and mores of the people using them differ.
-suggest that gender us experienced differently both on and within different social media
sites.
"Blogging" was just a new term for online "journaling" & "diarying" activities that girls and
women had been participating in for a decade.
RULES TO FOLLOW
Guidelines for proper sharing of information and using the internet.
(Your Online Identity 2014)
-Stick to safer sites
-Guard your passwords
-Limit what you share
-Remember that anything you put online is there forever,
even if you tried to delete it.
-Do not be mean or embarrass other people online
-Always tell if you see strange or bad online behavior
-Be choosy about your online friends
-Be patient.
Evaluation
Answer the following questions: (see assessment 10 attached)
References:
Alata, Eden Joy, et. al. 2021. A Course Module for Understanding the Self. Manila: Rex Bookstore
Inc.
Alata, Eden Joy, et. al. 2018. Understanding the Self. Manila: Rex Bookstore Inc.